Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-10-2009, 03:35 PM   #1
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 16,981
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default Using Wikipedia

Wikipedia is pro-establishment ie pro Jewish. Actually it IS Jewish as you can see

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78551

Here's what Wikipedia says about 911

Quote:
On the morning of September 11, 2001, Al-Qaeda-affiliated hijackers flew two 767 jets into the complex, one into each tower, in a coordinated suicide attack. After burning for 56 minutes, the South Tower (2) collapsed, followed a half-hour later by the North Tower (1), with the attacks on the World Trade Center resulting in 2,750 deaths. 7 World Trade Center collapsed later in the day

Here's the truth about 911 as you can prove for yourself using my easy stepwise guide

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showt...=73423&page=10

Conclusion

Wikipedia lies to promote its agenda. Since it is owned by Jews you can guess its agenda.

I see posters here quoting Wikipedia to support establishment cases. Wikipedia is only useful for where the information is neutral, or hostile to their cause. Because rest assured if there is any way to edit hostile content out of entries it will be done.

You have to put 2 and 2 together

For example




To begin to understand what's going on.

You will not find this Churchill quote using Wikipedia. One day you might not find it at all on the internet

I can imagine that between

Quote:
“The part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews ... is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders ... The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in (Hungary and Germany, especially Bavaria).

Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated”.
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/.../comments/864/

and WW2 he made his deal with the devil - his Black Dog.

It seems this is necessary for high success
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 03:44 PM   #2
hadabusa
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: zurich
Posts: 22,683
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

wikipedia shouldnt allow political and religious topics.

wo these(history is iffy,imo), itd be a credible source.
hadabusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 01:07 AM   #3
ownoiz
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,310
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

There has been a few threads and post on here about it.

For those who werent here the first time,

Look at where some of the edits come from...

From the thread http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47958


Quote:
Originally Posted by ownoiz View Post
Wikipedia is constantly edited by TPTB and governments, while other edits are removed...it has become a one sided propaganda tool.

Heres an example of what the Australian government are doing:

Quote:
PM's staff sanitise Wikipedia
Staff in the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet have been editing Wikipedia to remove details that might be damaging to the Government.

A new website, WikiScanner - which traces the digital fingerprints of those who make changes to entries in the online encyclopedia - points to the department as the source of 126 edits on subjects ranging from the children overboard affair to the Treasurer, Peter Costello.

WikiScanner also identifies employees of another department, Defence, as the most prolific Wikipedia contributors in Australia

Defence computers were found to have made more than 5000 edits to Wikipedia entries, including to articles on the "9/11 Truth Movement", the Australian Defence Force Academy and even the Vietnam War-era Pentagon Papers.
Read the full article, Government edits Wikipedia.

This article just skims the surface...IPs that trace back to Australian Government departments constantly edit wikipedia entries on a wide range of matters ranging from foreign policy to politicians profiles. In most cases ONLY edits that trace back to Australian Government IP adresses are left untouched, many other additions and/or edits are deleted promptly.
And another Wikipedia thread.
.
ownoiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2009, 01:15 AM   #4
illuminumnuts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Numnutsland, which is close to Moominland.
Posts: 6,647
Likes: 661 (311 Posts)
Default

They took off Nick Rockefeller completely (Russo interview).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...as_Rockefeller
illuminumnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 09:24 PM   #5
rodin
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: location location
Posts: 16,981
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default


No mention of

Quote:
Using new information obtained from studies of old Soviet files in Moscow and now the famous Vanona Intercepts -- FBI recordings of Soviet embassy communications between 1944-48 -- the record is showing that McCarthy was essentially right. He had many weaknesses, but almost every case he charged has now been proven correct. Whether it was stealing atomic secrets or influencing U.S. foreign policy, communist victories in the 1940s were fed by an incredibly vast spy and influence network.
http://www.rense.com/politics6/mc.htm
rodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:24 PM   #6
alien77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 341
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Question Question

who owns wikipedia????????????

What is its agenda ??????????
__________________


http://google.com

alien77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:43 PM   #7
andyh
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: West Cork, Ireland
Posts: 18,036
Likes: 5 (2 Posts)
Default

It has it's uses.

Nothing hidden there at all. Both pros and cons shown with links. In fact I'd say that was quite balanced and informative without being too decisive.

It's also quite useful for researching famous people. You don't have to agree with it, there's plenty of links to follow and research some more.

There's definitely some bias there, however you will find that everywhere....including on this forum
andyh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 10:44 PM   #8
wildhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In a stable by a sacred spring
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 220 (114 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alien77 View Post
who owns wikipedia????????????

What is its agenda ??????????
aye exactly....
wildhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.