Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-06-2018, 01:56 PM   #1
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default 11 September – Pentagon and Shanksville… disappearing planes

A lot of people know that the official story on 9/11 is a complete lie, but when you say that no planes crashed, they tell that you go too far.


CNN’s McIntyre tells no plane crashed at Pentagon
Jamie McIntyre of CNN reported that no part of a plane could be seen at the Pentagon:
Quote:
From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
Obviously McIntyre had violated CNN’s policy (to report only lies). How did CNN correct this? They never aired the show again and then released the following “rush transcript” of Jamie McIntyre reporting on September 11, 2001: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.35.html
Quote:
I could see parts of the airplane that crashed into the building, very small pieces of the plane on the heliport outside the building. The biggest piece I saw was about three feet long, it was silver and had been painted green and red, but I could not see any identifying markings on the plane. I also saw a large piece of shattered glass. It appeared to be a cockpit windshield or other window from the plane.



Pentagon - No missiles
The Pentagon story is so unconvincing that I think that maybe they first invented to have a story on a missile crashing, but changed it because the explosions in the WTC (WTC-7) didn’t go off (so they couldn’t say it was hit by a plane. Of course (just like with the planes that didn’t crash) there would have been no missile, but only some computer animated fakery and crisis actors telling about something that never happened.

Here’s a collection of photographs directly after the explosion in the Pentagon, with the conclusion that the damage to the Pentagon came from a missile, no debris of the airplane, while the damage doesn’t fit a large commercial airplane, and there’s even an exit hole of the missile: http://www.truthweather.com/images/pentagon/

See the photo that shows that the damage done to the Pentagon is not in accordance with a large Boeing 757 jet, and no airplane parts can be seen.


Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld said in an interview in October 2001 that the Pentagon was hit by a “missile”:
Quote:
Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
Tim Roemer, former 9/11 Commissioner, said in 2006 for the cameras of CNN that a “missile” damaged the Pentagon (and then quickly added airplane to hide his slip of the tongue): : https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Pen...o_the_Pentagon
Quote:
You were — you were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night, seeing one of our fortresses pried open by a missile, an airplane, thinking about the number of people that probably died on the plane and on the ground...

Photos show no plane crashed
Here’s a picture of the Pentagon after supposedly a 767 plane crashed.


Here’s a later picture.
The firemen had been spraying water. Why isn’t the wall of the Pentagon and the ground wet?


There were a couple of frames released, supposedly from 2 Pentagon security cameras.
If a big plane would fly by, this would be seen in a “real” video. If the separate frames would be shown, this would look like a big blur.
The following supposedly shows a plane on the right side (the next frame shows the explosion).


Here’s an analysis of the 2 “videos” from the Pentagon security cameras (actually the separate frames are looked into).
According to the maker of this video it would be possible to see perfectly synchronised fireballs from 2 videos. That isn’t possible, however.
The video was obviously manipulated...


Here’s a “leaked” video that is of such a low quality that I don’t know what to make of it. It doesn’t prove anything really…
It also contains the frames shown in the previous video from one of the security cameras: https://youtu.be/ZP3J2A1W_-c


USA Today witnesses the Pentagon crash
The following video on the Pentagon shows that many of the interviewed “witnesses” of the plane crashing into the Pentagon were from USA today. Thankfully there were journalists on the scene to confirm the official story....

Mike Walters (who’se father worked for Lockheed) saw the plane crashing into the Pentagon. Walters explains that it’s normal that so many USA today reporters were at the scene. Walters has changed hist story;
Vin Naryanan;
Joel Sucherman – was later than normal (so why were the reporters not in their office instead of on the road?), saw “very clearly” an American Airlines jet, and also saw a second plane;
Also featured in the video: Bob Dubill, Fred Gaskins, John O’ Keefe, Richard Benedetto, Mary Ann Owens.

There was a group of threes that would have obscured the view on the plane hitting the Pentagon.



Pentagon supermanpilot
According to the official story the hijacker terrorists had been to commercial flying schools (and weren’t interested in landing a plane). They had flying lessons in something like a Cessna 172.
Could learning how to fly a Cessna prepare you for flying a huge passenger plane like a Boeing 757?!?


I guess that really smart, highly talented Muslim terrorists, that had only been to a regular flying school, could keep a 757 flying. I can even believe that he could crash it in the middle of nowhere (like Shanksville), but flying into a specific skyscraper? No way!

The manoeuvre carried out by the plane that hit the Pentagon is really something special. Not one pilot (born on earth) could pull this off.
Hijacker-pilot Hani Hanjour supposedly pulled off an unprecedented 270° turn at 500 mph, diving 7,000 feet in less than 3 minutes. The last recorded altitude of the plane was 180 feet, because of the (real) air pressure the plane was in fact at an altitude of 480 feet above sea.
The light poles would have had to been 440 feet tall for this plane to bring them down. It would have been impossible to descend so fast to hit the Pentagon at ground level.
The story about this feat from pilots that get a little sarcastic: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html


No plane shanksville
There were a number of people that investigated the crash site, only to find that there was no plane, no bodies, and no luggage. See this quote from police officer Patrick Madigan: “I was amazed because it did not, in any way, shape, or form, look like a plane crash”.

The state propaganda invented that the plane had been “swallowed” by the ground. This would explain that no planes, bodies of passengers or luggage were seen at the pit?
There wasn’t even jet fuel in the soil. Later they did find plane debris miles away from the crash. And 12 days later 600 pounds of human tissue had reportedly been found (of the total of 44 people on the plane): http://911blogger.com/news/2013-02-1...-without-plane

Just look at one of the photographs, with people searching for debris of the plane without succes.

This spot was chosen deliberately, here’s a photograph from 1994 that shows that the remains of an old mine could give the impression of a plane crash.



No plane crashed – BTS, ACT, ACARS
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) keeps detailed records of (amongst others) take off times.
For both the planes of American Airlines, that were reportedly hijacked and crashed (AA11/WTC-1 and AA77/Pentagon), the BTS reported no take off times - so the planes didn’t leave the airport (until later). According to earlier information (that was later altered) from BTS these planes weren’t even scheduled to fly on September 11, 2001: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

This leaves the 2 airplanes of United Airlines. According to information from Air Traffic Control (ATC) - UA93 was still flying after it had supposedly crashed in Shanksville: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/united-...-airborne.html

This leaves 1 plane. According to information of the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) UA175 was still flying 20 minutes after it - according to the official story - had crashed in WTC-2: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ACARS-C...TER-CRASH.html

So according to records: 2 planes didn’t even leave the airport, while the 2 other planes were still flying when according to the official story they had already crashed.
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 07:10 AM   #2
antipodean
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Default

The Pentagon was the distraction needed so the Towers could be demolished without the difficulty of the collapse footage, having to be shown in real time.
On the tele we were shown a 10 second top down collapse, after they were demolished.
When it probably took about 20 minutes to do the job. Probably both collapsing simultaneously.

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic...=802&start=435
Likes: (2)
antipodean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 10:43 AM   #3
the nine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,328
Likes: 4,611 (2,581 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antipodean View Post
The Pentagon was the distraction needed so the Towers could be demolished without the difficulty of the collapse footage, having to be shown in real time.
On the tele we were shown a 10 second top down collapse, after they were demolished.
When it probably took about 20 minutes to do the job. Probably both collapsing simultaneously.

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic...=802&start=435
I can think of 2.3 TRILLION reasons why the pentagon was attacked, but non of them involve distraction...
__________________
"Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled;
The truth must be kept secret, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason… - Albert Pike Sharpen & Use your reasoning daily - the nine
the nine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 02:43 PM   #4
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the nine View Post
I can think of 2.3 TRILLION reasons why the pentagon was attacked, but non of them involve distraction...
There was no reason to hide the missing $2.3 trillion!
The "missing trillions" just keep piling up: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...agon+trillions


Quote:
Originally Posted by antipodean View Post
The Pentagon was the distraction needed so the Towers could be demolished without the difficulty of the collapse footage, having to be shown in real time.
That could be THE “simple” reason (I had thought about it before)…

On the “live” broadcast on CNN (starting just after the first plane hit the North Tower).
They do show the second plane flying “live” at 15:12, then to another view at 15:14 (courtesy WABC), and then the explosion at 15:16, they show this again from another view, camera some time later, but not from an angle that shows the plane crashing (disappearing) into the building.

They don’t show the South tower collapsing live at 1:10:09, but only 6 1/2 minutes later. They “switch” to the fire at the Pentagon for a diversion, so they don’t have to show the collapse “live”.

When they show the first collapse (the South tower) 1:16:45 -1:17:00 it still doesn’t show the top of the building (falling sideways), but the whole tower is hidden by what looks like white smoke (the North tower collapse is not shown in this video).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsIWPPw-JzU
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2018, 08:14 AM   #5
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy
CNN’s McIntyre tells no plane crashed at Pentagon
Jamie McIntyre of CNN reported that no part of a plane could be seen at the Pentagon:

Obviously McIntyre had violated CNN’s policy (to report only lies).....
Yes Jimmy he was threatend to put out that garbage bogus report in 2006!!!!

THEN HE QUIT CNN...... HE DIDNT WANNA BE A PART OF IT!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.