Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13-11-2017, 03:39 PM   #21
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default Depopulation agenda in Mexico

I’ve found an interesting story about the depopulation agenda in Mexico, which involves vaccines.
In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.


In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.


Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds. The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies.

Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
Quote:
Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/05/...cines-in-1974/
(archived here: http://archive.is/zxQ34)

In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation" to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
(archived here: http://archive.is/HG8pN)

In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilize women.
Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal..._HCG_on.1.aspx

In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-? subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/...76)90009-3/pdf


And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM200.htm
Quote:
29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
(…)
In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
(…)
Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
(...)
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
(…)
d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.

Last edited by st jimmy; 13-11-2017 at 03:45 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2018, 05:03 PM   #22
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default Wallace – Vaccination delusion

I’ve found another historic book that shows that vaccines are a fraud; Alfred Wallace – VACCINATION A DELUSION (1898): http://www.whale.to/vaccine/wallace/comp.html

My only problem with this book, are the graphs that are presented only at the end. It would be easier for the reader if the arguments were presented with the graphs...
The following is a summary of the most important evidence from the book.

No evidence for vaccines
There has never been any proof that vaccinated people are more healthy than the unvaccinated.
All the evidence shows that if the whole population of a country lived under healthy conditions - pure air, pure water, and wholesome food – all infectious disease would die out as completely as the plague and leprosy have died out.

Only 6 years after the announcement of small pox vaccination, in 1804, Dr. B. Moseley, reported many cases of properly vaccinated persons that contracted small pox anyway and even death resulting from vaccination.
In 1805, Dr. William Rowley and Dr. Squirrel published similar bad results of vaccination.
In 1809, Thomas Brown wrote that many of his patients caught the disease 2 to 8 years after vaccination.
In 1810, William Tebb brought before the Commission a paper by Dr. Maclean, with 535 cases of small pox after vaccination, of which 97 were fatal.


Falsifying the numbers
In 1802, Dr. Lettsom estimated the small pox deaths of Great Britain and Ireland before vaccination at 36,000 annually; by taking 3,000 as the annual mortality in London and multiplying by 12.
In 1812, and again in 1818, it is stated that the average number of deaths by small pox in London was 2,000 annually. In the last 2 decades before vaccination, there were 1,751 and 1,786 on average.
But in the Reports for 1826 and 1834, to advertise vaccination, it is stated that the London death toll (before vaccination) by small pox “was annually about 4,000”.
In 1836 and 1838, they further increased the London annual death toll before vaccines by small pox to “exceeded 5,000”, while claiming that the “last year only 300 died of the distemper.”
In 1839, based on these falsified numbers, the conclusion was drawn "that 4,000 lives are saved every year in London since vaccination”.

In 1881, Dr. W. B. Carpenter claimed that:
Quote:
a hundred years ago the small-pox mortality of London alone, with its then population of under a million, was often greater in a six months’ epidemic than that of the twenty millions of England & Wales now is in any whole year.
The highest annual small pox mortality for London in the 18th century was 3,992 (in 1772), while in 1871 it was 7,912 (almost double).
In 1871, the annual small pox mortality in England and Wales was 23,000 (5.8 times 3,992).

In 1880, Ernest Hart reported that in the years 1728—1757 and 1771—1780, the average annual small pox mortality of London was about 18,000 per million living.
The actual average mortality, was a little more than 2,000 . Even when the worst periods were chosen, with the lowest population estimates, the mortality per million was lower than 3,000.

From 1803 to 1851, among 31,705 well-vaccinated boys in the asylum, there were 39 cases and 4 deaths – an average mortality rate of 126 per million. This was reported by Balfour and John Simon as: "most conclusive proofs of the value of vaccination".
Because there is no comparison with other unvaccinated boys of the same age and similar living conditions, this isn’t sound evidence.
In the period of optional vaccination (1847-1853) the death rate from small pox of children from 10-15 years (similar to the age of the boys in the asylum) was 94 per million (thus lower than 126).
I note that this comparison by Wallace isn’t proper either, as the time period isn’t the same (from 1803 to 1853 the small pox death rate declined)...


Graph 1 - small pox, zymotics and total death rate London
The lower line shows the small pox death rate.
The middle line shows the zymotics death rate.
The upper line shows the death rate from all causes.
The left part, from 1760 to 1836, is from the "Bills of Mortality" which is less complete than the right part, from 1838 to 1896.


From 1760 to 1820, amid great fluctuations and some epidemics, a steady decline is seen - a difference of about 2,000 per million living.
The decline from 1820 is much slower.
The right part starts with the great epidemic of 1838. Until 1885 the decline is very slow; while, if we average the epidemic of 1871 with the preceding 10 years, there is no decline at all.
From 1886 to 1896, there is a rather sudden decline to a very low death rate.
Since 1854 vaccination was compulsory and almost universal; yet from 1854 to 1884 there is almost no decline of small pox perceptible, and the severest epidemic of the century occurred in 1871.
The clearly marked decline of small pox in the 10 years from 1886 to 1896 occurred, when there was a falling off in vaccination.

From 1838 to 1870, the zymotics death rate actually rose.
From 1871 to 1875, the zymotics death rate is lower.
In that last period the vaccination rate had diminished.

The decline of the total death rate from 1760 to 1820 is relatively great, and it continues somewhat slower to 1830.
Then from 1830 to 1870 there is hardly a perceptible decline.
From 1871 to 1896 the death rate declines.
In that last period vaccination was greatly diminished.


Graph 4 - small pox, measles, scarlet fever (zymotics) death rate Ireland and Scotland

Ireland obviously had a much lower death rate than Scotland.
Since 1883, small pox death has been almost absent from Ireland, Scotland, and England. In the 20 years of repeated epidemics from 1864 to 1883, we find the average small pox death rate of Scotland to be about 139, and of Ireland 85 per million.
Of the 2 countries, Scotland is better vaccinated against small pox, while the small pox mortality in Ireland is much lower.

But even Scotland had a much lower small pox mortality than England - in the years 1871-1873 (including the epidemic):
Ireland had a death rate of 800 per million.
Scotland had a death rate of 1,450 per million.
England had a death rate of 2,000 per million.
A possible explanation for this difference in mortality rate is that: in Ireland only 11% of the population live in towns of more than 100,000 inhabitants; in Scotland 30%; and in England and Wales 54%.


Graph 5 - small pox and total death rate Sweden

Vaccination was introduced in Sweden in 1801, probably first in the rural districts. Sweden was reported as a striking example of the value of vaccination.
Like in England, there was a great and sudden decrease of small pox mortality after 1801; by 1812 the whole reduction of mortality had already been achieved.
Since 1823, for more than 50 years, there were epidemics every decade (with the exception of the 1840s).
In Stockholm the first vaccinations were at the end of 1810. The earlier Stockholm epidemics in 1807, before vaccination, and in 1825, were less severe than the 6 later ones, when vaccination was more common.
The 1874 epidemic of Stockholm had a much higher death rate, of more than 50%, than in Britain.
The medical establishment explained the enormous small pox mortality in Stockholm as the result of deficient vaccination; but the Swedish Board of Health states that "the low figures for Stockholm depend more on the cases of vaccination not having been reported than on their not having been effected".


Graph 9 - small pox and total death rate Leicester


Starting in 1872, after the great epidemic, Leicester vaccinated their children less and less. By 1888 almost no children were vaccinated.
There is clearly a strong decline in death rate since Leicester refused vaccines.

Following are tables that compare not-vaccinated Leicester with well-vaccinated populations.
In the “great epidemic” of 1871, both Leicester and Birmingham were well-vaccinated, and both suffered severely by the epidemic.


The last column in the last table should have read “Navy”...
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278

Last edited by st jimmy; 17-02-2018 at 08:54 AM. Reason: Corrections
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 09:40 AM   #23
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default Vaccines and autism

At this time, in the US 1 in 36 children are diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
The CDC acknowledged that no proper studies have been done on vaccine safety in the US.
While there have been done some (manipulated) studies on the relation between autism and the MMR vaccine and thimerosal, the correlation with other “scheduled” vaccines is essentially unstudied.

Recently a report was released that found out that after parents had a child diagnosed with autism they often refused vaccines (for all their children). Obviously some of these parents thought that vaccines can cause autism. I wouldn’t call such a study “medical” however.
The “reputable” CNN subsequently published an extremely deceptive article —“Children with autism less likely to be fully vaccinated”. By its title CNN insinuated that vaccines prevent autism.

A 2004 report was fraudulent, as the 5 authors conspired to withhold data that that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine for specific subpopulations causes autism.
Another 2003 paper cited by the JAMA Pediatrics authors, involving thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark, was debunked by a later CDC report that showed that autism rates reduced after thimerosal was removed from vaccines in 1992: http://www.collective-evolution.com/...ism-denialism/

In 2017, Brian Hooker wrote a letter to complain on the blatant manipulation of a report to hide the statistically significant relationship between autism in children and the prenatal flu shot given in the first trimester of pregnancy.


Despite suppressing evidence by the CDC that vaccines cause autism, more than 80 independent studies show a correlation between (the toxics mercury and thimerosal in) vaccines and autism: https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-c...cts-4.2.18.pdf
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278

Last edited by st jimmy; 04-04-2018 at 09:41 AM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2018, 09:06 AM   #24
eddieb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 342 (189 Posts)
Default

Eustace Mullins, the man who exposed the American Federal Reserve through and by the instigation of Estra Pound ( Who was jailed in America for 13 years without being charged with any crime ) wrote a book entitled," Murder by Injection ". In the video of the same name he states that an American doctor said in 1939 that he had never seen cancer in an un-vaccinated person.
There are many Eustace Mullins video's on the tube all well worth watching.

i.e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWkqSncY3fg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7e5ZeudX44
__________________
The Nameless War. The book they said would never be written.
Author: CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY.
It's a small book, but it says so much!
Likes: (1)
eddieb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2018, 01:20 PM   #25
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,499 (899 Posts)
Default

My problem with this book is that Mullins doesn’t understand medicine or the human body enough to be writing about the medical industry; Eustace Mullins – “Murder by injection” (1988): http://newensign.christsassembly.com...n-Complete.pdf


A much better book on the medical industry is Peter Duesberg, Bryan Ellison - “Inventing the AIDS virus” (1996). The focus is on the AIDS sham, but there are also lots of explanations on how “medical research” works (repeatedly appearing in the book are “virus hunters”): http://www.whale.to/c/Inventing-the-...irus%20(1).pdf

See the following thread on AIDS: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062841036
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278

Last edited by st jimmy; 05-04-2018 at 01:20 PM.
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2018, 07:30 AM   #26
eddieb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 342 (189 Posts)
Default

[QUOTE=st jimmy;1063013535]My problem with this book is that Mullins doesn’t understand medicine or the human body enough to be writing about the medical industry; Eustace Mullins – “Murder by injection” (1988): http://newensign.christsassembly.com...n-Complete.pdf

I take it you read this book, if not your reply is worthless?
__________________
The Nameless War. The book they said would never be written.
Author: CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY.
It's a small book, but it says so much!
eddieb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.