Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Hidden Science & Advanced Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23-09-2014, 02:00 PM   #1
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default The Allais Effect and the Black Sun

THE ALLAIS EFFECT: EXISTENCE OF ETHER


"During the total eclipses of the sun on June 30, 1954, and October 22, 1959, quite analogous deviations of the plane of oscillation of the paraconical pendulum were observed..." - Maurice Allais, 1988 Nobel autobiographical lecture.

In a marathon experiment, Maurice Allais released a Foucault pendulum every 14 minutes - for 30 days and nights -without missing a data point. He recorded the direction of rotation (in degrees) at his Paris laboratory. This energetic show of human endurance happened to overlap with the 1954 solar eclipse. During the eclipse, the pendulum took an unexpected turn, changing its angle of rotation by 13.5 degrees.

Allais' pendulum experiments earned him the 1959 Galabert Prize of the French Astronautical Society, and in 1959 he was made a laureate of the United States Gravity Research Foundation.

Dr. Maurice Allais: Should the laws of gravitation be reconsidered?

http://allais.maurice.free.fr/English/media10-12.htm

In the present status of the discussion, the abnormalities observed can be accounted for only by considering the existence of a new field. (page 12)


Dr. Maurice Allais report to Nasa:

http://www.allais.info/alltrans/nasareport.pdf

Orders of magnitude incompatible with current theory

In both cases, with the experiments with the anisotropic support and with those with the isotropic support, it is found
that the amplitudes of the periodic effects are considerably greater than those calculated according to the law of gravitation, whether or not completed by the theory of relativity.

In the case of the anisotropic support, the amplitude of the luni-solar component of 24h 50m is about twenty million
times greater than the amplitude calculated by the theory of universal gravitation (pp. 118-129 and Table VII, p. 129).

In the case of the paraconical pendulum with isotropic support, this relation is about a hundred million (pp. 285-328).
The discrepancies discovered are enormous, and, as far as I know, unmatched in the literature.

In fact, the results of the experiments of July 1958 confirmed in an electrifying manner my previous reasoning, leading to the conclusion that, in the movement of the paraconical pendulum with anisotropic support, there are anomalies of a periodic character which are totally inexplicable in the framework of currently accepted theories.


http://davidpratt.info/gravity.htm

A similar gravity anomaly was measured using a two-pendula system during the line-up of Earth-Sun-Jupiter-Saturn in May 2001. During the total solar eclipse in 1997, a Chinese team performed measurements with a high-precision gravimeter. However, in contrast to the Allais effect, they detected a decrease in the earth’s gravity. Moreover, the effect occurred immediately before and after the eclipse but not at its height. In the course of observations conducted since 1987, Shu-wen Zhou and his collaborators have confirmed the occurrence of an anomalous force of horizontal oscillation when the sun, moon, and earth are aligned, and have shown that it affects the pattern of grain sequence in crystals, the spectral wavelengths of atoms and molecules, and the rate of atomic clocks.

Various conventional explanations have been put forward to account for gravity anomalies during eclipses, such as instrument errors, gravity effects of denser air due to cooling of the upper atmosphere, seismic disturbances caused by sightseers moving into and out of a place where an eclipse is visible, and tilting of the ground due to cooling. Physicist Chris Duif has argued that none of them are convincing. He believes that gravitational shielding, too, cannot explain the results, as it would be far too weak (if it exists at all).

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0408023

http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf



The Allais pendulum effect confirmed in an experiment performed in 1961:

http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf074/sf074a05.htm


Miles Mathis on the Allais effect:

http://milesmathis.com/allais.html


Dr. Allais' thoughts on terrestrial gravity and aether:

No Action at a Distance


No action at a distance is conceivable without the existence
of intermediary medium.

All known actions, gravitational, optical, electromagnetic,
propagate through a medium, the aether.

The attraction according to Newton's law of the inverse
square of the distance or Ampere's formulas are not actions at
a distance. They result from local actions which propagate
progressively across space through the aether.


Contrary to what was assumed in XIXth century and early XXth
century, the aether is subject to movements and local deformations,
in other words, the aether is an anisotropic medium. This anisotropy
varies over time and space.

The properties of the "vacuum" are nothing else than aether properties.

The movements and deformations of the aether influence the
different phenomena observed and all these phenomena are influenced
in the same way.

Atoms, particles, photons ... are but (local) singularities of
the aether which remian to be explained by differential equations.


The Allais effect confirms the geocentric Coriolis force hypothesis:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...3747#msg953747

Trying to use Foucault's pendulum as proof for heliocentricity really backfired when Maurice Allais repeatedly observed pendulums slowing their motion during eclipses! This implies that either the "rotating Earth" decelerates during eclipses or the firmament does.


CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE 2003 SOLAR ECLIPSE:

http://www.acad.ro/sectii2002/procee...03_Mihaila.pdf

(it also shows that the effect was confirmed during the August 1999 solar eclipse)


CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE SEPT. 2006 SOLAR ECLIPSE:

http://www.hessdalen.org/sse/program/Articol.pdf


CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE 2008 SOLAR ECLIPSE:

http://stoner.phys.uaic.ro/jarp/inde...viewFile/40/22


Given the above, the authors consider that it is an inescapable conclusion from our experiments that after the end of the visible eclipse, as the Moon departed the angular vicinity of the Sun, some influence exerted itself upon the Eastern European region containing our three sets of equipment, extending over a field at least hundreds of kilometers in width.

The nature of this common influence is unknown, but plainly it cannot be considered as gravitational in the usually accepted sense of Newtonian or Einsteinian gravitation.


We therefore are compelled to the opinion that some currently unknown physical influence was at work.


The Allais pendulum effect confirmed in an experiment performed in 1961:

http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf074/sf074a05.htm



Observations of Correlated Behavior of Two Light Torsion Balances and a Paraconical Pendulum in Separate Locations during the Solar Eclipse of January 26th, 2009:


http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...uary_26th_2009



CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE JULY 2010 SOLAR ECLIPSE:

http://www.diaspora-stiintifica.ro/d...astronomic.pdf (LAST PAGE)

More information on Professor D. Olenici's experiments here: http://www.allais.info/priorartdocs/olenici.htm



Precise Underground Observations of the Partial Solar Eclipse of 1 June 2011 Using a Foucault Pendulum and a Very Light Torsion Balance


http://www.researchgate.net/publicat...orsion_Balance

Simultaneous observations of the solar eclipse on 06/01/2011 were carried out using a Foucault pendulum and a torsion balance. The instruments were installed in a salt mine, where the interference was minimal. Both instruments clearly reacted to the eclipse. We conclude that these reactions should not be considered as being gravitational effects.

Last edited by sandokhan; 23-09-2014 at 02:11 PM.
sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2014, 02:04 PM   #2
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default

"Allais used the phrase “a brutal displacement” … to describe the “sudden, extraordinary backwards movement” of the pendulum his laboratory chief had seen (and carefully recorded!), even while not knowing its “mysterious” cause ... until later that same afternoon.

Here (below) is what those “anomalous eclipse motions” in Allias’ pendulum looked like; this graphic, adapted from Scientific American, depicts the mechanical arrangement of Allais’ unique paraconical pendulum (below – left).

The three vertical panels to its right illustrate the pendulum’s “highly anomalous motions” -- recorded during two partial solar eclipses to cross Allais’ Paris laboratory in the 1950’s (the first in 1954, the second in 1959); the phase of each eclipse that corresponded with these “anomalous motions,” is depicted in the last three vertical strips (far right)."



"This normal, downward-sloping trend is abruptly REVERSED!

From there, things rapidly got even more bizarre--

As the pendulum’s azimuth motion continues in an accelerating, COUNTER-clockwise direction … for the next 45 minutes; then, after peaking, the pendulum motion REVERSES direction (moving clockwise again …), only to reverse BACK again (counterclockwise!) … briefly [as the Moon reaches “mid-eclipse” (the central green line)] -- before abruptly reversing once more, accelerating again in a CLOCKWISE direction … before eventually “bottoming out” … parallel to the ORIGINAL “Foucault/Earth rotation” downward-sloping trend line!"


Dr. Maurice Allais:

“… the current theory of gravitation (being the result of the application, within the current theory of relative motions, of the principles of inertia and universal gravitation to any one of the Galilean spaces) complemented or not by the corrections suggested by the theory of relativity, leads to orders of magnitude [many factors of ten] for lunar and solar action (which are strictly not to be perceived experimentally) of some 100 million times less than the effects noted [during the eclipse] ... [emphasis added].”

In other words, the pendulum motions Allais observed during his two eclipses – 1954 and 1959 -- were physically IMPOSSIBLE … according to all known “textbook physics!”

Allais’ ultimate “physical explanation” for the dramatic and totally anomalous paraconical pendulum behavior he observed, is summed up thus (below):



The heart of all good science is “replication.”

By repeating his “anomalous 1954 observations” five years later, during another solar eclipse over Paris (in October, 1959), Allais fulfilled every essence of “good science” – even if the mainstream theoretical community was (and still is!) completely baffled by his remarkable, physically replicable ... meticulously empirical observations.

The overlaid graph (below), containing the paraconical pendulum data from BOTH sets of eclipse observations, proves the elemental point:



Dr. Erwin Saxl experiment (1970)

"Saxl's lab equipment for these long-running "gravitational experiments" consisted of a horizontally rotating weight -- termed a "torsion pendulum" (as opposed to the vertically mounted "paraconical" pendulums of Allias) -- which, instead of swinging "to and fro," rotated horizontally "left, then right" ... on a fine, pre-stressed, vertically suspended, specially-made ("Ni-span C") steel wire ... during each run of Saxl's rotational experiment.

The concept behind Saxl's device was simple:

The full period of "one clockwise/counter-clockwise partial rotation" of the vertically-suspended weight (below) -- through a small angle -- was optically measured from the pendulum's initial release point; the subsequent "left/right" rotational motion of the "bob" -- driven by the weight of the bob and the "twisting tension" in the wire from which the massive bob was hung -- determined the length of time (the "period") of one "torsion measurement" [an overall schematic, from his original patent, of Saxl's massive machine (to eliminate unwanted vibrations) is illustrated below]. "



Saxl's torsion pendulum readings (below) -- taken before, during and after the actual March 7 eclipse -- are most revealing; as he and Allen later reported, in "1970 Solar Eclipse as 'Seen' by a Torsion Pendulum," published in the February 15, 1971 issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal, "Physical Review D":

"... Significant variations in the recorded times [of one "left/right" oscillation] were observed during the course of the eclipse, as is shown by the full line in Figure 1. Each point in this figure is the result of five consecutive [electrically] grounded readings. The limited vertical lines indicate the average deviations of the five readings from the averaged circled values. The beginning of the eclipse at 12:31 p.m., its mid-point at 1:40 p.m. and its end at 2:58 p.m. are also indicated [by the three vertical yellow lines, marked "a" ... "b" ... and "c" ] on the graph. It is to be noted that these observed time intervals [of pendulum bob partial rotations/oscillations] level off at about 29.581 sec [for one full oscillation] after the end of the eclipse, whereas in the morning [4:00 AM EST] they had started at about 29.570 sec, an appreciable difference inasmuch as the ["full period"] times can be read to 0.00001 sec and are significant to about 0.0001 sec. The precision of the quartz-crystal-controlled oscillator in the Beckman EPUT (events per unit time) counter is one part in '10 to the exponent 8' ...."

"As with Allais' first startling observations of his eclipse, sixteen years earlier, Saxl and Allen also noted "peculiar waves" in the torsion pendulum's behavior ... seen well before the eclipse had even begun locally in the Boston area (above - bottom left) ....

They wrote:

"... the irregularities occurring before the start of the eclipse might be considered accidental, except that data taken two weeks later at the same hour of the day (dashed green curve - above) show corresponding humps -- an indication, by the way, that the observations are reproducible. These maxima and minima may indicate a kind of gravitational [sic] fine structure which is reproducible even when the positions of the sun and moon relative to the earth are quite different. This apparent wavelike structure has been observed over the course of many years at our Harvard laboratory. It cannot be predicted on the basis of classical gravitational theory nor has it been observed in the quasistationary experiments underlying this theory (e.g., spring-operated gravimeters, seismographs, and interferometer devices) ... [emphasis added] ...."

Saxl and Allen went on to note that to explain these remarkable eclipse observations, according to "conventional Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational theory," an increase in the weight of the pendumum bob itself on the order of ~5% would be required ... amounting to (for the ~51.5-lb pendulum bob in the experiment) an increase of ~2.64 lbs!

This would be on the order of one hundred thousand (100,000) times greater than any possible "gravitational tidal effects" Saxl and Allen calculated (using Newtonian Gravitational Theory/ Relativity Theory) for even the 180-degree, "opposite" alignment of the sun and moon ... which, as previously noted, was also directly measured via the torsion pendulum (dasned green line - above) two weeks after the March 7 eclipse!

The two scientists then observed:

"... It is further to be noted that the greatest change [in the torsion pendulum oscillation period] occurs between the [local] onset of the eclipse and its midpoint [below - right]. This agrees qualitatively with Allais with a paraconical pendulum, where the change of azimuth increased substantially in the first half of the eclipse of 30 June 1954 [below - left]. Both these effects would seem to have a gravitational basis [sic] which cannot be explained by accepted classical theory [emphasis added] ....""






EDIT

In recent years, a new kind of theory has emerged (TGD - Topological GeometroDynamics) which attempts to explain the Allais effect.

http://www.emergentmind.org/pitkanen_i.htm

However, the entire theory is based on the official results of the Michelson-Morley experiment (in fact, one of the main proponents of TGD, M. Pitkanen, states emphatically: "The famous Michelson-Morley experiment carried out for about century ago demonstrated that the velocity of light does not depend on the velocity of the source with respect to the receiver and killed the ether hypothesis.", and as a reference he uses the wikipedia article on the subject.

Moreover, TGD is based on the space-time continuum hypothesis and even multiple space-time sheets; furthermore, it only takes into consideration the MODIFIED/CENSORED Maxwell equations, and NOT the original set of equations which is based entirely on the ether/aether concept.


The complete demolition of the Michelson-Morley experiment (the greatest scientific catastrophe of the 19th century) and of the space-time continuum notion:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...683#msg1545683
sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2014, 02:08 PM   #3
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default

We know for sure the identity of two of the three heavenly bodies which take part in a solar eclipse: the Sun and the Earth.

However, the photographs taken in Antarctica by Fred Bruenjes, during the November 2003 total solar eclipse show us that the Moon COULD NOT POSSIBLY cause the solar eclipse.









http://www.moonglow.net/eclipse/2003nov23/


It is the radiation of the Black Sun which does cause the Allais/Saxl effect, by activating the laevorotatory subquarks (the antigravitational subquarks, as opposed to the dextrorotatory subquarks = terrestrial gravity) in order to produce the visible effects on the pendulum.

“… the current theory of gravitation (being the result of the application, within the current theory of relative motions, of the principles of inertia and universal gravitation to any one of the Galilean spaces) complemented or not by the corrections suggested by the theory of relativity, leads to orders of magnitude [many factors of ten] for lunar and solar action (which are strictly not to be perceived experimentally) of some 100 million times less than the effects noted [during the eclipse] ... [emphasis added].”

Saxl and Allen went on to note that to explain these remarkable eclipse observations, according to "conventional Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational theory," an increase in the weight of the pendumum bob itself on the order of ~5% would be required ... amounting to (for the ~51.5-lb pendulum bob in the experiment) an increase of ~2.64 lbs!

This would be on the order of one hundred thousand (100,000) times greater than any possible "gravitational tidal effects" Saxl and Allen calculated (using Newtonian Gravitational Theory/ Relativity Theory) for even the 180-degree, "opposite" alignment of the sun and moon ... which, as previously noted, was also directly measured via the torsion pendulum (dasned green line - above) two weeks after the March 7 eclipse!



"That many such bodies exist in the firmament is almost a matter of certainty; and that one such as that which
eclipses the moon exists at no great distance above the earth's surface, is a matter admitted by many of the leading astronomers of the day. In the report of the council of the Royal Astronomical Society, for June 1850, it is said:--

"We may well doubt whether that body which we call the moon is the only satellite of the earth."

In the report of the Academy of Sciences for October 12th, 1846, and again for August, 1847, the director of one of the French observatories gives a number of observations and calculations which have led him to conclude that,--

"There is at least one non-luminous body of considerable magnitude which is attached as a satellite to this earth."

Sir John Herschel admits that:--

"Invisible moons exist in the firmament."

Sir John Lubbock is of the same opinion, and gives rules and formulæ for calculating their distances, periods.

Lambert in his cosmological letters admits the existence of "dark cosmical bodies of great size."


Those who have a problem with SIMULTANEOUS SOLAR/LUNAR ECLIPSES should read the following:


From America, Christopher Columbus also wrote to the king and the queen of Spain about the simultaneous eclipses:

This that I have said is what I have heard. What I know is that the year 94 I sailed in 24 degrees to the west in 9 hours, and it could not be mistake because there were eclipses: the sun was in Libra and the moon in Ariete.

http://www.mgar.net/docs/colon4.htm

Esto que yo he dicho es lo que he oído. Lo que yo sé es que el ańo de 94 navegué en 24° al Poniente en término de nueve horas, y no pudo haber yerro porque hubo eclipses: el sol estaba en Libra y la luna en Ariete.


Now, "Columbus" is NOT describing a selenelion (both the Sun and the eclipsed Moon can be observed at the same time in the RE theory): he used the words "hubo eclipses" (were eclipses), there were a solar and a lunar eclipse occurring at the same time.

sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2014, 02:12 PM   #4
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default

http://www.allais.info/docs/pugarticle.pdf

ABSTRACT

"During the solar eclipse of 1 August 2008 three programs of physics observations were independently conducted by teams in Kiev, Ukraine, and Suceava, Romania, separated by about 440 km. The Ukraine team operated five independent miniature torsion balances, one Romania team operated two independent short ball-borne pendulums, and the other Romania team operated a long Foucault-type pendulum. All three teams detected unexplained disturbances, and these disturbances were mutually correlated. The overall pattern of the observations exhibits certain perplexing features."


CONCLUSIONS

"Given the above, the authors consider that it is an inescapable conclusion from our experiments that after the end of the visible eclipse, as the Moon departed the angular vicinity of the Sun, some influence exerted itself upon the Eastern European region containing our three sets of equipment, extending over a field at least hundreds of kilometers in width.

The nature of this common influence is unknown, but plainly it cannot be considered as gravitational in the usually accepted sense of Newtonian or Einsteinian gravitation. The basic reason is that in those models the gravitational influences of several bodies are combined by addition, at least to the accuracy detectable by molar equipment. However all three of our experiments exhibited rather brusque variations (the abrupt jumps of the Kiev balances, the humps and particularly the sharp spikes in the Suceava short pendulum charts, and the deviation of the Suceava long pendulum) which cannot have resulted from linear combination of the gravitational/tidal influences of the Sun and the Moon, the magnitudes and angles of which vary only gently over the time scales of the effects seen. We therefore are compelled to the opinion that some currently unknown physical influence was at work."
sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-09-2014, 02:19 PM   #5
semper_occultus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: ..there is another system..
Posts: 369
Likes: 126 (81 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Gurdjieff’s Second Moon

In Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson, Gurdjieff claims that the earth’s moon was chipped off the earth as a result of an asteroid collision. He mentions a second moon that orbits the earth, unknown to astronomy.

Science has detected a tiny planetoid [called 3753 Cruithne] about three miles in diameter with an awkward relationship to the Earth due to a 1:1 orbital resonance. This planetoid (which doesn’t function as a satellite but may seem to act like one) encircles the sun in 364 days, which means that it gradually drifts farther away from the earth each year and will invalidate its satellite-like relationship in time.

Though it was officially discovered in 1986, calculations said that it was “visible” (with at least a 12.5 telescope) in about 1902. At that time, Gurdjieff would have been 36 years old and would have possibly heard of its existence.

More likely, however, Gurdjieff would have received his knowledge from the Sumerian Creation Myth called Enuma Elish, which tells that Marduk, a gigantic planet, came to visit Tiamat, and colliding with it, created the present Earth and Moon.

http://ggurdjieff.com/sources/
....
semper_occultus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2014, 07:49 AM   #6
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default

Tiamat = Black Sun

Marduk= Jupiter

Kingu = Mars

Zecharia Sitchin got it all wrong in the 12th Planet...
sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 01:32 PM   #7
sandokhan
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 87
Likes: 11 (11 Posts)
Default

Heliocentrical axial precession is not related to Newtonian mechanics, the Allais effect:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...033#msg1642033


Stationary Earth, the Allais effect and the anomalies of Foucault's pendulum:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...668#msg1642668


Now we can understand why and how Kepler and Galilei are fictional characters invented at least two hundred years later in time, in order to justify the Gregorian calendar reform hoax:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...725#msg1638725

Last edited by sandokhan; 03-12-2014 at 01:33 PM.
sandokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.