Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Today's News > Politics / Elections

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16-11-2012, 12:31 PM   #1
fahimknight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 21 (14 Posts)
Default Forty states desire to secede from the union

FORTY STATES DESIRE TO SECEDE FROM THE UNION: TREASON OR ACT OF LIBERTY?

By Fahim A. Knight-El

I am advocate of legal and peaceful dissent because our United States Constitution affords us that right and it would be hypocritical, if I did not acknowledge that these individuals and States who filed petitions to secede from the United States Government have the right to express dissent and present their grievances in a lawful manner. This is protected under the First Amendment Right of the United States Constitution and I do not think that they should feel any repression from the U.S. Government for seeking separation and sovereignty from the United States Government. This is how Washington State framed its secession petition: “Peacefully grant the State of Washington to peacefully withdraw from the United States and to form its own government. Under the auspices of the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America the Citizens of the State of Washington take this grave action in an attempt to wrest sovereignty back unto itself so as to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity”.

Yet, I have always maintained that race is still unresolved in the United States in particular in these neo-confederate States such as Texas (80,000 signatures), Mississippi, North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, Georgia, Alabama, etc; (the last time I checked over five hundred thousand people had signed onto the various petitions to secede) have been using the election and now re-election of President Barack Obama to antagonize and instigate the fears of mainly poor and oppressed whites in which to appeal to their historical emotions of their ancestors losing the Civil War. I was visiting Savannah, Georgia, perhaps two years ago and there was a convention being held at the Marriott hotel off General McIntosh Boulevard and the Riverfront under the banner of the Sons of the Confederate Veterans and it was a sight to see this nostalgic era being played out in the costumes and replicas of Civil War weapons, etc. The aura in the hotel gave the impression that they were gearing up to fight and reclaim the South for a second time.

Our Government has become tyrannical, totalitarian and Fascist in which some people are angered about the direction that our nation is headed and view the federal government as impeding on their personal rights and State's rights with impunity. I would agree with this much of their argument; it is no longer a government of the people by the people and for the people. Some Patriots feel that their liberty has been further stomped upon by the reactionary policies of President Barack Obama and the election served as proof positive for the necessity to declare themselves free of Union rule (I would be the first to admit that this sounds like an 18th or 19th century scenario and debate and not an issue of serious modern relevance applicable to the 21st century). Yet, if you do not know by now, these people are serious about seceding from the United States (I must also admit that this is no homogenous or monolithic voice echoing these sentiments, it is perhaps more like a woven together blanket of various ideologies, which ranges from the Ku Klux Klan, Militia groups, strict constitutional constructionist, Tea Party loyalist, Sons/Daughters of the Confederate Veterans, etc., to the far the rightwing of the Republican Party and many other dissatisfied white Americans. They consider themselves as so-called good and God fearing Christians who want to separate from a nation that has become increasingly black and brown. We better play close attention because these petitions could gain momentum. I am of the belief that even the submission of the petition of itself could be considered acts of treason and sedition.

I am assuming that this is a white led movement and if secession is granted, how do some of these states deal with large populations of Latinos (Hispanics), Asians and African Americans and would they be accepted as part of the seceding sovereignty? Many that hold this rightwing agenda of seceding from the Union believe that race—interpreted to mean that black and brown is the problem with America and represents that 47% class that Mitt Romney depicted as looking for government handouts. The variable of race serves as an antagonist contradiction; they could not imagine the Super Pacs spent almost 6 billion dollars collective during this 2012 election season and spent over 2 billion dollars just on the presidential election in which Karl Rove assured the Rightwing that he would deliver them the presidency. Will the elected governors of these states serve as the new presidents of these various proposed new sovereign nations and territories? How will the mineral rites and natural resources be dealt with? Will these sovereign nations be allowed to have their own independent arm forces on U.S. soil and most of all will they be permitted to enter into international treaties and agreements with enemy nations of the United States? What will be arrangement with the United States relative to who will control the vital and strategic ports and waterways that are of most important to the United States national security? The notion of seceding as one can tell is a complex theory and will poses problems for the petitioners and the United States.

There is conservative website named RedState led by Erik Erickson who has from time to time endorsed the idea of Texas (the lone Star State) having the right to secede from the Union and even Texas Governor and United States Presidential candidate Rick Perry has endorsed the seceding movement from time to time. Now, reason with me, because I have to point out the double standard in order to bring some balance to this article and this is where me and most white patriots part ways; just take a moment and imagine if Muslims in the United States were to have filed this same type petitions and ask for a state which to secede and separate from the United States and declare themselves as a government inside a government. There would have been tremendous outrage spewed by the ignorant that Muslims would establish a sovereign state based on Sharia rule and some of these same liberty seekers would be opposed to Muslims seeking to secede from the Union; moreover, they would not even be allowed to have this type conversation without persecution and prosecution. This automatically would have called for intense Federal Bureau of Investigation scrutiny and surveillance, and no doubt it would have been met by the long arm of the U.S. Patriot Act, Military Commission Act, Anti-Terrorism Acts, National Defense Authorization Act, United States Justice Department and any other arsenal at the disposal of the office of Homeland Security could use to halt such an action that would be viewed as anti-American and the question of secession in of itself could be considered a declaration of war. These individuals filing these type petitions and anyone associated with them relative to post 9-11, perhaps could be argued that they should be classified as Enemy Combatants and enemies against the State (this government recourse is not without precedent).

For example, Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale (founders of the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense) and George and Jonathan Jackson (Soledad Brothers) and other black revolutionaries were prime targets of the United States Government counterintelligence program dubbed Cointelpro by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. The United States Government implemented massive and widespread acts of repression aimed at all levels of the Black Power Movement for daring to declare themselves a self-defense organization that advocated Black Nationalism and who evoked the Second Amendment Right to bear arms and even raised the question of secession. Many of these black freedom fighters lost their lives and others received long term prison sentences like the Panther 21 and others like Elmer ‘Geronimo’ Pratt who was wrongly convicted and after serving over 25 years in California State Prison system was exonerated, Mumia Abu-Jamal (Philadelphia Chapter of the Black Panther Party) who still languishes in the American penal institution with a death warrant over his head.

The Black Panther Party had a 10 Point Plan; which number 10 stated: “When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation”.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience hath shown that mankind are most disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But, when a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”

The United States Government took all actions to disrupt and neutralize militant and radical black leadership and worked to compromise their organizational effectiveness by sending U.S. Government agent provocateurs who were used to instigate and cause internal confusion in order to incite police, which led to many Panthers losing their lives at the hands of racist police. Eldridge Cleaver in 1968 published his most famous book titled, “Soul on Ice” in which he wrote a very interesting letter to then Governor Ronald Reagan requesting that he be pardoned and sentence be commuted (Cleaver declared himself a political prisoner). Many do not know that Cleaver while serving prison time had converted to the Nation of Islam and teachings of Elijah Muhammad. The Honorable Elijah Muhammad also advocated separation and secession and many do not know that the Black Panther Party "10 Point Plan" was drawn from the Black Muslims and Nation of Islam Program “What the Muslims Want” and “What the Muslims Believe” Muhammad stated: “We want our people in America whose parents or grandparents were descendants from slaves, to be allowed to establish a separate state or territory of their own--either on this continent or elsewhere. We believe that our former slave masters are obligated to provide such land and that the area must be fertile and minerally rich. We believe that our former slave masters are obligated to maintain and supply our needs in this separate territory for the next 20 to 25 years--until we are able to produce and supply our own needs”.

“Since we cannot get along with them in peace and equality, after giving them 400 years of our sweat and blood and receiving in return some of the worst treatment human beings have ever experienced, we believe our contributions to this land and the suffering forced upon us by white America, justifies our demand for complete separation in a state or territory of our own”

They hailed one bright spot in this recent presidential election relative to electing close to 30 Republican Governors (or adding to the Republican count of conservative governors) and I am willing to bet you these are some of the States who filed petitions to secede from the United States. Here is how the state of the Commonwealth of Virginia petition read: “As the founding fathers of the United States of America made clear in the Declaration of Independence in 1776: "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and institute new Government..."

They are masters at disguising their real intent by hiding behind politics. Many of today’s secession movement still possess a 16th and 17th century colonial mentality in which in their worldview, as well as their paradigm has been shaped by historical nostalgia and from this mindset, Chattel Slavery and the Civil War (1861-1865) are also unresolved (the Dred Scott Decision and the Missouri Compromise) and other slave legislation (they believe that at some point they will redeem themselves relative to losing the Civil War and will one day physically fight to regain their great, great great, great grandparents glory). These States are hiding behind their so-called political dissatisfaction, but from a white supremacy perspective, they are more angered that our country is being led by President Barack Obama, a black man and they would rather secede from the Union, then to remain under his ruler-ship for another four years. But here is the contradiction they claim to be advocates of patriotism and democracy and possess a deep seated belief in liberty. But I thought in theory the Revolutionary War (1770-1776)—Declaration of Independence with the 16 Colonies breaking away from the ruler-ship and domination of Great Britain and the U.S. Constitutional Conventions held in Philadelphia (the city coined the city of brotherly love, which is direct Masonic lingo) and culminated with the formulation of the U.S. declaring itself one nation. Furthermore, U.S. Constitution in 1787 was rooted in the principles of freedom, justice and equality (and I was taught that the Civil War was fought to keep this nation one and unified). Many revisionist historians agree and maintained as Charles A. Beard wrote in his treatise titled: "An Economic Interpretation of the United States Constitution" (1913) the constitutional language in principle and intent favored white male property owners. Thus, white women and blacks were permitted from voting, which lie the bases of American democracy. Blacks were written in the U.S. Constitution as chattel (property) and were deemed 3/5 of a human being.

The South lost the Civil War and most reasonable historians would agree that slavery was the central issue of the Civil War (1861-1865) because it was the economic driving force of the nation at that time and perhaps the most value commodity in the History of America; but one should not be mistaken because the North and the South benefited from slave labor. I recently read a piece authored by Donald W. Livingston titled, “Why the War Was Not About Slavery” Livingston stated: “We think of slavery as an alien and "un-American" practice confined to the South in the 19th century. But an honest look at American history reveals a quite different picture. Slavery was woven into the economic, political, and cultural fabric of the Northern states from the beginning. The first African slaves were brought to New England in 1638 in exchange for enslaved Indians. Boston began importing slaves from Africa in 1644. For 164 years New Englanders sold slaves throughout the Western Hemisphere”. Jefferson Davis and Robert Lee, the faces of the Confederate South had declared that the South would secede from the Union before they would capitulate and give up slavery. The South viewed slavery strictly as an economic necessity (we have always questioned the moral ineptness of this evil institution) and these wealthy white property owners were not willing to cripple their profitable economic enterprise by giving up their labor force without a fight. Some African Americans view Abraham Lincoln as a hero because he so-called freed the slaves on September 22, 1962 with the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation (but actually it would ultimately be the Thirteen Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1965 that truly abolished slavery); however the slaves that he freed in the Confederate South, he had no jurisdiction over those slaves.

Lincoln used the issue of slavery as a strategic and tactful maneuver to create social and political tension for the Confederates and to create military discord in order to disrupt South‘s efforts to succeed from the Union. Most Historians have argued that if Lincoln could have maintained the Union and kept slavery as an institution, he would have done exactly that and for that reason this writer does not view Lincoln as a philanthropic humanitarian who valued black people in this over-all conflict. J.A. Rogers gives this assessment in his book titled, “Africa’s Gift to America: The Afro-American in the Making and Saving of the United States : With New Supplement, Africa and Its Potentialities”.

I have been a harsh critic of President Barack Obama since he appeared on the radar as a presidential candidate in 2008 as a Rothschild, Rockefellers and Kissinger agent, but to those who are not aware of these entities, perhaps view his two elections as the greatest form of democratic expression—this was seen in Obama receiving over three and half million of the popular vote (surely one could argue that the people had spoken) and received over 300 electoral College votes. This negative sentiments and backlash represents the racial and historical divide in the United States.

However, some would further, argue that the Civil War was about States rights and this has been debated since the formulation of the United States as a government and nation in 1787—federal authority (central government) versus States right to exercise self-determination; but no one could deny that slavery created a political rift and social tension between two bourgeoisie classes of white men (aristocratic property owners from the North and South). This was the primary reason the southern states were literally up in arms. The North (the Union Army and leadership) were mandating that the south give up their most valuable asset, which was free slave labor. Agriculture and farming was the economic way of life for the South and it was African slaves for 310 years who plowed, planted, excavated and worked from dawn to dusk (never even received the 40 acres and a mule for their servitude).

This free labor created a power Elite aristocratic class and even to this day their wealth has transcended time and eventually was used to establish banking houses. The cotton gin was a relatively new invention and technology had not advanced enough to do away with the need for human labor. And to this very day the farms and fields (agri-business) of America are full of brown hands (migrant workers who moves with the planting seasons and is even allowed work visas to enter the United States from Mexico and other Central and South American nations) picking the cotton, tobacco, vegetables, fruits and all manner of produce that sustains this nation (the Latinos are the new slaves). Slavery was an integral part to making America a wealthy society; thus, before the factories in the North became the focal point of American business, it was agriculture (numerous of cash crops ranging from cotton to tobacco). Also the early American settlers could not have survived without the Indians who literally saved the very people who would later exterminate them, and the African Slaves who built the early infrastructure of the United States have been left as second class citizens and vagabonds of the earth. The U.S. economy was built and dependent on slavery; many of the Founder Fathers of this nation and the framers of the U.S. Constitution were vast landowners and slaveholders.

Will these people who are looking to secede from the United States represent the impetus and beginning of an internal Civil War?

Fahim A. Knight, Chief Researcher for keeping it Real Think Tank located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at [email protected] yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Last edited by fahimknight; 16-11-2012 at 03:26 PM.
fahimknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 01:08 PM   #2
adude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Apparently its now 47: http://www.stuartwilde.com/2012/11/18015/
adude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2012, 08:45 PM   #3
fahimknight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 21 (14 Posts)
Default Seceding from the union: How do the international

SECEDING FROM THE UNION: HOW DO THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SEE THIS IDEA?

By Fahim A. Knight-El

I think the question of secession, is really not a new phenomenon, in particular in a state like Texas, which the question of seceding has been on and off the table for a very long time, but let me state right off the back, that I am advocate of dissent and the constitutionality of their right to exercise their 1st Amendment, 9th Amendment and 10th Amendment right. Our Democracy, it gives us the right to dissent and I do not necessarily think that dissenting is a bad thing as long as it is within the legal guideline and laws of our nation. But I am also of the opinion that the secession movement speaks to how the question of race is still very much unresolved in the United States of America and unless we move beyond the superficial discussions of race; this discussion has to take place regardless of how painful it may be and who the historical culprits were and first admit slavery was criminal act—It must begin with an open apology from the United States Government and I do not mean no half-hearted conditional apology that the U.S. Congress issued a few years ago and we have to erase the white wash of the historical record of slavery and allow the naked truth to be presented unedited. Minister Louis Farrakhan and Nation of Islam's Historical Research Department published a second edition of their controversial book titled, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" and no one has yet to take full responsibly for this 310 year tragedy (not even reparation would make us whole, although it would be justified).

I personally do not give a damn about the south losing the Civil War because African people were the booty of this war (these arguments overlook that there were over 100 million Africans that were unjustly brought to shores of the Americas during the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the Middle Passage). Let me give you just a little glimpse into their treatment, they were sold on auction blocks, divided from wives and children, flog and beaten to death if they showed any opposition or resistance, worked dusk to dawn; denied the ability to read and write, robbed of their culture, traditions, language, names, religion and denied the ability to love and turned into 'Negroes' and most of all they instilled and imbedded self-hatred in which these practices became inculcated and systemic. If anyone and/or race of people who should be petitioning to seceding from the United States Government, it should be the so-called American Negro (African American, African, Black man, etc)—it was human suffering that was tied to the southern agriculture empires and created an aristocratic class of land lords at the expense of human suffering and dehumanization; this is why the Civil War was fought to diligently maintain the enormous economic interest of the white property owners. Farrakhan's book maintained that it was not just white interest, but Jewish interest; the book "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews", points out how cotton was the king of the cash crops in Mississippi and the southern black belt and these Robber Barons transitioned their enormous wealth into what became powerful banking houses in the United States.

These Confederates do not understand that unless they tackle the international bankers and Federal Reserve who is responsible for their misery and oppression nothing is ever going to change; it becomes hypocritical to think that seceding from the Union is the ultimate solution to resolving their political, economic and social problems and believing that if they secede this would somehow bring economic and social parity. It is not African Americans or Latinos that have put them in their social and political predicament (this is only a smokescreen), but the Rothschilds—who serve as the chief agitator and manipulator of race is for ever lurking as the Hidden Hand. They constantly feed poor whites and poor blacks a set of norms that is rooted in the history of American race relations, which has an objective of divide and rule. But the re-election of President Obama has exacerbated long standing historical tensions that are rooted in the American politics of race and the seceding rhetoric is the last resort of a dissatisfied sector in mainly old Confederate States. What amazes me is that States like Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, etc., based on per capita income and standard of living ranks as some of the poorest states in the United States, but racism blinds them when it comes to rationality and this often leads them to vote against their own interest. They think that it’s the black and brown problem that is ruining the civility of the United States and they fail to understand that the Dynastic families of Elitist gives them race as a distraction to keep their foot on their and our necks.

They are mere victims of controlled propaganda and even if there was a new Civil War, it would be in the political and economic interest of High Finance and not the interest of some red blooded Confederate who is advocating white American style patriotism. They do not have the guts or intestinal fortitude to declare war on the real slave drivers who sit on Wall Street and manipulate global suffering and has reduced many of these Confederate States down to a WalMart economy. Their impoverishment has been systematically orchestrated and they think the Money Emperors are going to somehow allow them reclaim the south. J.P. Morgan and the Harriman Brothers and the Rothschilds do not give a damn about southern racism and the secession movement, unless it starts to affect their bottom line (their motivation is always based on money and greed). Rothschild stated: "Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws" --Amsel (Amschel) Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838

The International Bankers and Wall Street have lured them to sleep and at the same time have outsourced American industries; many of these Confederate municipalities were the recipients of federal government stimulus money and if it wasn’t for government back incentives many of these states would have been bankrupt. For example, during the vice presidential debate do you recall when Joe Biden reminded Congressman Paul Ryan that he called Biden and submitted an application as a representative of Wisconsin asking for federal stimulus money—the textile economy, automobile industry and all forms of manufacturing have been outsourced to Mexico and South East Asia. Many of these southern Confederate States are right-to-work states where the workers rights are not protected by law and they labor at the pleasure of corporate industries. They ignorantly fight against workers unions (because the media dupes them into believing that to fight for workers rights and labor is to embrace communism and socialism) and most times they literally vote against their own interest. Many of the poor whites in these states have large percentages of whites on government assistance programs such as food stamps and welfare and if it was not for Medicaid they would not have medical care insurance. How do we alter this type of mindset or is the dumbing down process that is so overwhelming and this is an uphill challenge and battle? I am of the belief that change in America is not going to occur until we find better and strategic ways to change the thinking of the American people (I know it’s easier said than done)

The action of the secessionist ideology and movement and behavior quasi demonstrates that they do not fully believe in Democracy and the American Democratic process. I may not agree with some of President Barack Obama's policies, but he was duly elected by the people or may be I should say by the Cabal (I fully understand this variable, but I have to play the devil’s advocate). I do not think that if Mitt Romney would have won the presidential election; these States would not have filed these petitions to secede from the Union because of their disagreements with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and U.S. Patriot Act, I believe these are convenient excuses which to hide their true agendas. For example, the Patriot Act has been on the books since 2001, as well as other reactionary Executive Orders and legislation has been on the books. But as I stated above, other than the State of Texas who from time to time has consistently advocated secession; the others in my opinion disagreed with the outcome of the presidential election and now are yelling secession. Thus, after the election it has now become politically expedient to use the reactionary and oppressive police state policies as an excuse to justify the rhetoric and not publically man-up that real motivation to secede, which is racism.

Many of the southern Confederate States have never gotten over losing the Civil War. I think it is even more disingenuous to desire to secede not just because of “the Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, and the TSA groping” (these are valid concerns that I share), but the one thing that is being overlooked and left off the list was the racism variable and factor, which is the main motivation to secede. I cannot question what's in some of these secessionist hearts or their motivation relative to the question of secession and how they see it, but I believe the impetus of this movement is rooted in the history of American racism. They were not looking to secede prior to the 2012 presidential election and the conservative right boasted that they were going to make President Barack Obama a one term president and they put over a billion dollars ensure that he was voted out of office. Now, many of these southern racist Confederates are relating back to the language of the American Revolution and Civil War; we are living in the 21st Century under a so-called Republic that is based on democracy. Here is the problem and issue that I am having, the American people voted overwhelmingly for President Barack Obama, he received over 3 million of the popular votes and he won over 300 of the Electoral College votes (this by all standards was a convincing win within a so-called democratic process). The masses of the American electorate rejected Mitt Romney and the conservative Rightwing Agenda and it was that 47% that he openly condemned who sent him home packing. I thought voting was rooted in liberty and represented the highest form of Democracy. The entire secession rhetoric looks suspicious, in particular right after losing the election now this small minority wants to breakaway from the United States of America.

The history of America speaks for itself. Some of their motivations might be entirely different from my racial analysis, but I am not ready to concede that point—knowing the racial history of the United States. Nevertheless, no one can convince me that many of these secessionists have not found the opportunity to shield themselves behind these petitions (claiming constitutionality and liberty). I live in the south and some of these folk still believe we are in the Civil War era and their interpretation of these historical events are colored and rooted in the history of American style racism. I know what they mean when they say that wanting to go back to the 'old south'. One Blogger tried to downplay my argument by trying to equate my assessment to the Zionist strategy here was my response: “ I think it is unfair to lump the Zionist and anti-Semitism analogy to this argument. I am not suggesting that people should not have the right to assess, criticize, evaluate and condemn any behavior that would be deemed unjust. I think those who are much more powerful than African Americans use their influence and power to stifle debate and label any criticism of Jewish (Zionist) behavior as being anti-Semitism; thus, it takes away from the deep seated moral question—the question of what is right and wrong relative to Zionism without being falsely labeled an anti-Semite. I do not think that’s my motive”.

I think many in Blog Sphere already know by the various post and threads that I have written and posted on my Keeping It Real Blog http://fahimknightsworld.blogspot.co...s-see-who.html for the last five years, thus, how I feel about the False flags and my position on 9/11, it surely is not rooted in the government’s version of these events. I have consistently maintained that President Barack Obama is controlled by the Hidden Hand and the Invisible rulers (like all prior U.S. presidents) such as the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg. I know there are a lot of smoking mirrors and I do not think anyone has consistently hammered this position perhaps more than I, in particular on my Blog. But once again, George W. Bush in 2000 literally stole an election and bankrupt our government by being the front man (Rothschild’s puppet) that sent our nation into an economic depression not seen since the Great Depression of 1929. He and Bernanke used the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England and induced an artificial economic crisis in 2008 that has devastated the lives of the American people even to this very day. But guess what as terrible as Bush polices were, in particular in greasing the palms of international bankers and Wall Street financiers to the detriment of the American taxpayers (surely his policies reflected taxation without representation in my opinion it was tyranny) his criminal conduct was allowed to coexist in our democracy. But guess what again his 2000 stolen presidential election mirrored something that you would have expected to occur in a Developing Nation; not in a so-called first world democracy. However, after the United States Supreme Court upheld his election; I cannot recall any 'liberals' mandating secession (although many felt democracy was not served) and looking to breakaway from the Union. Our democracy sustained itself until the next election in which Bush won a second term (for better or worse this election was a little more legitimate). No secession was advocated. I did not hear these Confederates filing petitions to secede and based on Bush running a foul of the United States Constitution and law, they in my opinion would have had more legal justification to seek secession grievances. So yes I am very suspicious of the underline intent of these secessionists.

It is also a valid argument that President Obama continued what George W. Bush initiated because he does not have the power or authority to alter the agenda that has been set by the Invisible Rulers. Once again I had thoroughly condemned and criticized some of the same points made by Dave Hodges in his thecommonsenseshow.com article referencing Valerie Jarrett. But Hodges and others like him shocks me by loosely throwing out communism as some boogieman theory and they use this 1950 Marxist analysis to scare the hell out of the ignorant—communist are taking over the country this is ludicrous (Wall Street Bankers have always been the Masters of our country). Thus, Communism did not put us in this present crisis, but CAPITALIST international bankers are responsible for our misery.

However, like I stated above, I am not willing to overlook the racial component in this hold idea of secession and many have tried to explain that there are other motivations associated with secession other than race, which I partially agree. But the dismantling of individual rights and State rights were in full effect when Bush started his reign of revoking our civil liberties. The United States Patriot Act was enacted 43 days after the 9/11 hoax in which he and our government flat out lied that it was an Al-Qaeda attack led by Saddam Hussein out of Iraq (not Osama Bin-Laden) on the World Trade Center and the U.S. financial capitol and our mass silence made us culpable because there was no mass resistance or outrage and the results speaks for itself and we have now come full circle.

If these secessionists were genuine, they would have called for mass revolt and resistance during Bush's tenure. But I am also smart enough to know that these 50 states filing these petitions is more of a symbolic gesture because everyone knows that very few of them (States) could maintain and sustain their sovereignty politically, economically or socially—the geopolitical factors and variables are totally against them without some assistance from the United States Government. So in reality, they would be back at square one (looking towards President Obama and the U.S. taxpayers and Congress to subsidize their independence). But in this symbolic secession argument, it is shrouded in the complexity of racism that has allowed them a privilege status who for over 200 years has been the benefactors of living in 'a pigmentocracy'. They would rather stir people up—often poor whites and appeal to a demographic who thinks they share privilege with the white Elite and they do not understand that we all are pawns regardless of ethnicity, nationality, race, skin color, etc.

The secession idea and the timing of such is a serious reverse play on the race card but many of the pundits will only say what is politically correct. I am pointing that factor out. America has a serious history of divided race relations and the secession movement is a prime indication of such. May be some are right about the culmination and fulfillment of time that has brought us to this space and time. But it is the timing of these secessionist that has driven me to take the position that I have taken. The evidence is clear that 9/11 was a hoax and we were duped on relinquishing our civil liberties in the name of national security; our national treasury was heist by Bush and the international bankers—Robbery Barons and money changers. He led the charge in turning the U.S. Constitution into a worthless piece paper. He also, led the United States into two senseless wars in the false name of patriotism I would argue what other convincing evidence would one need to draw the determination that the time for dissent has been imperative for over 10 years. Many who understand the nature of False Flags have been sounding the alarm. You see President Obama is not the problem he only inherited the script.

Fahim A. Knight, Chief Researcher for keeping it Real Think Tank located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at [email protected] yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Last edited by fahimknight; 21-11-2012 at 01:10 AM.
fahimknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2012, 03:52 AM   #4
motleyhoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 787 (355 Posts)
Default

Texas gets almost $40 billion per year from the federal govt. How do they think they're going to make that up, selling enchiladas and hot sauce?

.
__________________
"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it ... It is not a field of a few acres of ground, but a cause, that we are defending, and whether we defeat the enemy in one battle, or by degrees, the consequences will be the same." -- Thomas Paine
motleyhoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2012, 04:57 PM   #5
fahimknight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
Likes: 21 (14 Posts)
Default

But I am also smart enough to know that these 50 states filing these petitions is more of a symbolic gesture because everyone knows that very few of them (States) could maintain and sustain their sovereignty politically, economically or socially—the geopolitical factors and variables are totally against them without some assistance from the United States Government. So in reality, they would be back at square one (looking towards President Obama and the U.S. taxpayers and Congress to subsidize their independence).

Stay Awake Until Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El
fahimknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2012, 05:39 PM   #6
werehere2bhappy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I disagree with you Fahim – I think you’re adding this race card – unnecessarily- far detracting from the real issue at hand

1)“If anyone and/or race of people who should be petitioning to seceding from the United States Government, it should be the so-called American Negro(African American, African, Black man, etc)…”
Why the “whites” in your country are totally abused too– playing the “whose is most abused?”/”who’s been abused more?” is distracting from succession idea

2)“They constantly feed poor whites and poor blacks a set of norms that is rooted in the history of American race relations, which has an objective of divide and rule”
You agree the divide and rule theory exists /is negative, yet rather then move on/forget/laugh/never dwell /never highlight unless for good/calculated purpose (by writing this piece which tries to heavily link race to succession…as if meaningful) you promote /continue the very theory you stand against…Remember most adults think like children, their semi-conisious and superstitious make believe world, and you have just run the risk of them associating racism to succession –- their will be people who do not vote/show support because of reading your piece- again it is highly distracting.

3)“J.P. Morgan and the Harriman Brothers and the Rothschild’s do not give a damn about southern racism and the secession movement, unless it starts to affect their bottom line (their motivation is always based on money and greed). Rothschild stated: "Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws"”
My best analysis/guess here is…No, their not motivated by money and/or greed – once you have so much £/assets you cannot spend it 1000 lifetimes – it is far beyond simple greed. They have created such abundance on their side and such scarcity on our side – the entire game is not as it looks - their hoarded abundance is worth little to them in the sense of liquidating it/reintroducing it to market – to them the most value is to hoard it/take it out of market- the act of hoarding it, itself, not just a) creates huge scarcity for us/by shrinking supply/raising demand - but also b) retains the present hyper inflated market value of their out-of-market assets, and their in market assets… if they turned new leaf/become nice and give money/assets back/or reparations… (ie. Put them back “on the table”/back in the market) – it would mean the market supply would flood/demand plummet – thus the paper £ value of the present market (i.e. our savings/houses etc…) would devalue significantly…(as a side note - this is not to say the idea should be dismissed – I think we would still gain, a little in terms of hard assets –metals/land/resources/minerals etc… but the paper £ value would no where near be today’s hyper inflated value). Anyhow, I assume and have found nothing to contradict - their motivation is not hoarding for savings/investment purposes, but hoarding to create scarcity in effort to control people – its more sick/evil then any regular connotation of “greedy” /”money hungry” etc…

4) You say
“the others in my opinion disagreed with the outcome of the presidential election and now are yelling secession…..”
so were talking your opinion - then you say
“that real motivation to secede, which is racism.” And “one thing that is being overlooked and left off the list was the racism variable and factor, which is the main motivation to secede.”
So one minute opinion, the next facts, backed up by no more then opinion?

5) You say
“it is the timing of these secessionist that has driven me to take the position that I have taken”
You list many, I repeat many, decent reasons that could trigger the desire for secession. But your stuck on the timing issue…can you perceive of a ‘lag time’ here? Just think you live in a country where everyone is robbed blind so they cant afford healthcare/ decent education (your schools being more like social psychology conditioning centres), the media/movie social conditioning – all teaching you to never dream of secession, most eat msg, aspertain, the vaccines, mercury, the pharmaceuticals, many of your fellow man are physically and psychologically ill…(think -it took many 5 years/10 years to wake up to 911)
Thus you have huge non-racial motivation for succession (erosion of civil libs, NDAA, etc… as you list) – while so to – are there are many good reasons for a delay in awakening to it. This leave the FED thinking was bound to happen on mass at some time– so you need more then just ‘I think racisms motivating it because of timing seems co-incidental’ Also if your idea was valid why didn’t all the states opt to secede 4 years ago

6) Finally the key point I want to make is does it matter? Who cares- if a percentage of the people e who desire succession- want it for the wrong reasons? Is not the major question you could concentrate on – Weather or not it be best firstly for Americans? – And secondarily for the planet? The centralisation of global power/globalism agenda could be halted by this greatly – if you guys did it right…organised it right…you’re clever people, are very ingenious

(Personally was encouraged to here of mass succession… then I heard Dr Deagle – who said roughly - if you did it now it would be suicidal – something to do with - the states banks ? state would still need subsistence from the fed? and chance of civil war?…( he gave metaphor of you don’t chop body into pieces to do heart surgery – you just work on the heart /the FED- So I would look for further analysis, what does D.I. think, AJ think? )

anyhow this is only critism/take it as you will
werehere2bhappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 03:52 AM   #7
ritchs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ultima Thule
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 422 (225 Posts)
Default

/\
|

Fabulous Post, its about money, yes, but as pointed out, it is the control and power that money brings. With money you can buy off almost anything. That is how they seized control of the congress and senate, through lobbyists

We now have the best politicians that money can buy
__________________
“Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves."

Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
ritchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 08:39 PM   #8
patrick timpone
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Could you imagine if even just a few states seceded from the union? How amazing would that be.

I for one have been advocating for years that Texas needs to be the first. We can take the Constitution out for a spin and see what it'll do!
patrick timpone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 08:17 AM   #9
anyuser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 15 (11 Posts)
Default

this stuff is great and all but just b/c 40 out of the supposedly 50 (there is more) want to, when will one of them or more do it?
anyuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 04:13 PM   #10
apollo_gnomon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6,392
Likes: 6 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anyuser View Post
this stuff is great and all but just b/c 40 out of the supposedly 50 (there is more) want to, when will one of them or more do it?
Please explain the bolded bit for us.
apollo_gnomon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 01:34 AM   #11
animus
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

People from all 50 states filed a petition to the official website asking for succession. Texas accrued enough signatures to warrant a response: "No."

Someone made a point that you don't "ask" for succession. You declare it. Revolution is around the corner.
animus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 01:45 AM   #12
bendoon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,954
Likes: 1,346 (693 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motleyhoo View Post
Texas gets almost $40 billion per year from the federal govt. How do they think they're going to make that up, selling enchiladas and hot sauce?

.
I would guess that the US Government gets a lot more than 40 billion from Texas.
__________________
The Beast from the sea with 7 heads, 10 horns and 10 crowns has been wounded to one of the heads, the 2 horned beast from the earth commanded us to worship the 7 headed beast but on 23rd June 2016 we said no.


Don't forget, everything is foretold you just need to have the eyes to see and the ears to hear.
bendoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.