Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Lawful Rebellion / Non Compliance / Sovereignty

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 14-12-2010, 08:09 AM   #1
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default COURT: Who’s Who and What to Say - Mary Croft

This is about the CQV trust and how to terminate it in court. I do not know if it's been tested yet, and would like to see that happen.

It sounds like she has taken Frank O'Collins on board and added her own bits to it i.e. remedy.

If it does work then WOW.

http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/

Quote:
My position on going to court has always been: never voluntarily go to court. Live men and women are not meant to be in any place designed solely for the business of fictional entities. When we attend court, we are deemed dead, in fact, they cannot deal with us until we admit to being dead….a legal fiction….a trust. Court is for titled persons: judge, prosecutor, defendant, bailiffs, cops, and attorneys. Live men and women are not recognized, so it makes sense to send in a dead person––an attorney––to handle our cases …. except for one thing: they do not know how the system works, due to their indoctrination. If you can find one to do as you say, then you will prevail, but most of them would rather hang onto their BAR cards than behave honourably. The only thing that dead, fictional entities want from us is our life energy, and the only way they can get it is by our agreement. Without us, they cannot function, so, they are desperate to get us into court, to have us pay the debt which they created by charging the trust.


Since common law courts no longer exist, we know that the case never has anything to do with “facts” or live men and women and so, anyone who testifies (talks about the facts of the case) is doomed. ALL courts operate in trust law, based upon ecclesiastical canon law–– ritualism, superstition, satanism, etc.––which manifests as insidious, commercial law and we are in court to take the hit, if they can get us to do so. They use every trick in the book––intimidation, fear, threat, ridicule, rage, and even recesses, in order to change the jurisdiction, when they know they are losing, in order to make us admit that we are the name of the trust. When we do so, we are deemed to be the trustee––the one liable for administering the trust. Ergo, until now, it has been a waste of our time, energy, and emotion to go to a place where it is almost certain that we will be stuck with the liability.


We all know from our indoctrination, programming, and schooling that judges are impartial and have sworn an oath to this effect. This means he must not favour either plaintiff or defendant. But, our experience reveals that he does, indeed, favour the plaintiff, indicating a glaring conflict of interest––that the prosecutor, judge, and clerk all work for the state––the owner of the CQV trust. So, as the case is NOT about “justice”, it must be about the administration of a trust. They all represent the trust owned by the state and, if we are beneficiary, the only two positions left are Trustee and Executor. So, if you detect the judge’s partiality, although I doubt the case will get this far, you might just want to let them know that you know this.


If you consider court as entertainment and if you can stand the evil emanating from its officers, the fear and angst oozing from the walls, and the treacherous atmosphere, then go, knowing that under trust law we cannot be the trustee or the executor of a trust, whilst being beneficiary, as that would be a conflict. The position of beneficiary may lack clout, but the other positions hold liability. Since state employees want to be the beneficiaries of the trust, the only way they can do so is to transfer, to us, the liability which they hold, as trustees and executors, because they also cannot be both the administrators and beneficiary of the trust. So, trusteeship and executorship, i.e.: suretyship, becomes a hot potato and everyone wants to toss it so s/he can be beneficiary of the credit from the trust.


When we were born, a trust, called a Cestui Que Vie Trust (“CQV”) was set-up, for our benefit. Evidence of this is the birth certificate. But what is the value which must be conveyed to the trust, in order to create it? It was our right to property (via Birth into this world), our body (via the Live Birth Record), and our souls (via Baptism). Since the state/province which registered the trust is the owner, it is also the trustee…. the one that administers the trust. Since they, also, wanted to be beneficiary of this trust, they had to come up with ways to get us, as beneficiary, to authorize their charging the trust, allegedly, for our benefit (via our signature on a document: citation, application, etc.), and then, temporarily transfer trusteeship, to us, during the brief time that they want to be the beneficiary of a particular “constructive” trust.


This means that a trust can be established anywhere, anytime, and the parties of the trust are quickly, albeit temporarily, put into place. But, since a beneficiary cannot charge a trust––only a trustee can do so––it is the state that charges the trust, but they do so for their benefit, not ours (albeit occasionally we do reap some benefit from that charge but nowhere near the value which they reap. Think bank loan….. we reap a minute percentage of what they gain from our authorization). So, the only way, under trust law, for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary––us, and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles––from beneficiary to trustee (the one responsible for the accounting), and for them to switch their role––from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time, i.e.: within the same constructive trust. They must somehow trick us into accepting the role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit? …. and how do they manage to do this?


Well, the best way is to get us into court and trick us into unwittingly doing so. But, if we know what has transpired, prior to our being there, it is easy to know what to say so that this doesn’t happen. The court clerk is the hot shot, even though it appears as if the judge is. The clerk is the trustee for the CQV owned by the state/province and it is s/he who is responsible for appointing the trustee and the executor for a constructive trust––that particular court case.


So s/he appoints the judge as trustee (the one to administer the trust) and appoints the prosecutor as executor of the trust. The executor is ultimately liable for the charge because it was s/he who brought the case into court (created the constructive trust) on behalf of the state/province which charged the CQV trust. Only an executor/prosecutor can initiate/create a constructive trust and we all know the maxim of law: Whoever creates the controversy holds the liability and whoever holds the liability must provide the remedy. This is why all attorneys are mandated to bring their cheque-books to court because if it all goes wrong for them…. meaning either they fail to transfer their liability onto the alleged defendant, or the alleged defendant does not accept their offer of liability, then someone has to credit the trust account in order to off-set the debt.



Since the prosecutor is the one who issues bogus paper and charges the trust, it is the Prosecutor/Executor (“PE”) who is in the hot-seat.
When the Name (of the trust), e.g.: JOHN DOE, is called by the Judge aka Administrator aka Trustee (“JAT”), we can stand and ask, “Are you saying that the trust which you are now administrating is the JOHN DOE trust?” This establishes that we know that the Name is a trust, not a live man.



What’s the JAT’s first question? “What’s your name?” or “State your name for the record”. We must be very careful not to identify with the name of the trust because doing so makes us the trustee. What does this tell you about the judge? If we know that the judge is the trustee, then we also know that the judge is the Name, but only for this particular, constructive trust. Now, think about all the times that JATs have become so frustrated by our refusal to admit to being the Name that they issue a warrant and then, as soon as the man leaves, he is arrested. How idiotic is that? They must feel foolish for saying, “John Doe is not in court so I’m issuing a warrant for his arrest” and then, the man whom they just admitted is NOT there is arrested because he IS there. Their desperation makes them insane. They must get us to admit to being the name, or they pay, and we must not accept their coercion, or we pay. Because the JAT is the trustee––a precarious position, the best thing to say, in that case, is “JOHN DOE is, indeed, in the court!” Point to the JAT. “It is YOU! As trustee, YOU are JOHN DOE, today, aren’t you?!”


During their frustration over our not admitting to being a trust name––the trustee and/or executor of the trust, we ought to ask who they are. “Before we go any further, I need to know who YOU are.” Address the clerk of the court––the trustee for the CQV trust owned by the state/province, “Are you the CQV’s trustee who has appointed this judge as administrator and trustee of the constructive trust case #12345? Did you also appoint the prosecutor as executor of this constructive trust?”



Then point to the JAT: “So you are the trustee”, then point to the prosecutor, “and you are the executor? And I’m the beneficiary, so, now we know who’s who and, as beneficiary, I authorize you to handle the accounting and dissolve this constructive trust. I now claim my body so I am collapsing the CQV trust which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud against all laws!” Likely, we will not get that far before the JAT will order “Case dismissed” or, even more likely, the PE, as he clings tightly to his cheque-book, will call, “We withdraw the charges”.


We have exposed their fraud of the CQV trust which exists only on presumptions. The CQV has no corpus, no property, ergo, no value. Trusts are created only upon the conveyance of property and can exist only as long as there is value in the trust. But, there is no value in the CQV trust, yet, they continue to charge the trust. That is fraud! The alleged property is we men and women whom they have deemed to be incompetent, dead, abandoned, lost, bankrupts, or minors, but that is an illusion so, if we claim our body, then we collapse the presumption that the trust has value. They are operating in fraud––something we’ve always known, but now we know how they do it. Our having exposed their fraud gives them only three options:
1. They can dissolve the CQV trust––the one for which the clerk of the court is trustee and from which s/he created a constructive trust––the case––for which s/he appointed the judge and prosecutor titles which hold temporary liability––trustee and executor, respectively. But they cannot dissolve the CQV or the entire global system will collapse because they cannot exist without our energy which they obtain via that CQV trust.


2. They can enforce the existing rules of trust law which means, as trustee, they can set-off their debt and leave us alone. Now they know that we are onto their fraud and every time they go into court to administer a trust account, they will not know if we are the one who will send them to jail. The trustee (judge) is the liable party who will go to jail, and the executor (prosecutor) is the one who enforces this. This is why they want us to take on both titles, because then, not only do we go to jail but also, by signing their paper, we become executor and enforce our own sentence. They cannot afford to violate the ecclesiastical canon laws, out of fear of ending their careers, so they are, again, trapped with no place to run.


3. They can dismiss the cases before they even take the risk of our exposing their fraud …. which also makes no sense because then their careers, again, come to a screeching halt.
What’s a court clerk to do!? Pretty soon, none of these thugs will take any cases because the risk is too great. This will be the end of the court system. ‘Bout bloody time, eh?


Knowledge––not procedure––is power.



The means by which we have attempted to assuage our problems, inflicted upon us by the PTW (powers that were) have all been superficial, compared to the origins of all the black magic, superstition, satanic ritualism, trickery, mind-control, and clandestine practices. Under commercial law, dating back to the Code of Ur-Nammu––around 2100 BCE––the use of another’s property without permission puts one into dishonor and makes him liable for any debts. So, our using UCC forms, bills of exchange, AFV, or bonds, and altering documents of the Roman System can create penalties, as this is trading and/or using the property of a corporation we do not own …. the birth certificate proves that the “name” is, in fact, the property of the corporation which issued it. We can do all the paper perfectly but, in the end, they say, “Sorry; you’re not one of us.” But, now, we get to inflict fear onto them. When we are forced to court, knowing that the Judge acts as the Trustee and the prosecutor acts as Executor of the CQV Trusts is empowering. It gives us two choices:


1. If we wish to expose the fraud of presumptions, by which the CQV trusts still exist, then the court is the perfect opportunity to have them dissolved or to prove the fraud because the Trustee is sitting on the bench. Dissolving the first CQV, dissolves them all; or,


2. If we are not inclined to use something like the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll to expose the fraud of the CQV Trusts, then, at least, we ought to know that everything the judge says––even if it sounds like a command, order, or sentence––is actually an offer which we can choose to decline (“I do not consent; I do not accept your offer”). This is a fundamental principle of testamentary trusts…… the beneficiary can accept or decline what the trustee offers.


For 15 years, I have watched the alleged solutions in commerce come and go and nothing has worked for enough people on enough occasions to call anything a consistent win. Paying for information is insanity because those who sell information clearly have not prevailed or they wouldn’t need to sell anything, would they? Buying express, private-contract trusts, e.g.: NACRS, is a huge waste of time and money because the entire process is too complicated for anyone with an IQ below 400 and …. “no refunds”. I have found no solution in commerce because those who claim to have solutions still insist upon treating symptoms rather than curing the cause––the fraudulent CQV trust.


CONT..........
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 08:12 AM   #2
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default 2nd Part

Part two:

Quote:
If we send an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll (see: http://one-heaven.org/canons_positiv...ticle_1330.htm ), as response to a summons or arrest warrant, then the judge who issues them has to think long and hard: “Am I willing to gamble that the man who walks into my court might call me on my role of trustee and expose the fraud that the CQV Trusts are still in place?


Canons of Positive Law: http://one-heaven.org/canons_positiv...ticle_0000.htm


This knowledge is your power. –– Frank O’Collins
History of Trusts
http://one-heaven.org/home.asp


The 1st Trust of the world



Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It is an express trust deed. The last line reads: “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.


Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum



In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam––the first Express Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the world”. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an elaborate crown at its base.



The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele. It also represents the pineal gland in the centre of our brains––crystalline in nature–– which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone.
See: Pharmacratic Inquisition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnvEHObMMH4


The 1st Crown of Crown Land



Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”. This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.


The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth



The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.



This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day. This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of
the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of
ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.


The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See



The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See. The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.



This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls––upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.


The Cestui Que Vie Trust



A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.


A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide. As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.


Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.


The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:



1. convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,



2. claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.



3. claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.


Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).


What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?



Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real hidden power of a judge when we face court? Is it their superior knowledge of process and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious?


It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust––to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust. When we receive legal paper or have to appear in court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property contained within them. Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable use of certain property, never legal title. So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the Trustee and Office of Executor? We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law. Well, they are doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any mistakes. The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the mirror image to them––the ghost––the dead. It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge that has remained “legal” for far too long.



Spread the word.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 09:48 AM   #3
he said it was brasso
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 848
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Interesting post. I look forward to hearing the outcome of a man/woman attempting this in court. Can I assume it is only applicable to commercial matters (civil) or is equally applicable to criminal matters too?

I wonder (assuming this is true) if solicitors are aware of this? Or to put it another way, who would be aware of this?

In relation to the following quote:

Quote:
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
Is someone seriously suggesting that my soul/spirit belongs to someone else? Prove it
he said it was brasso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 10:05 AM   #4
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by he said it was brasso View Post
Interesting post. I look forward to hearing the outcome of a man/woman attempting this in court. Can I assume it is only applicable to commercial matters (civil) or is equally applicable to criminal matters too?

I wonder (assuming this is true) if solicitors are aware of this? Or to put it another way, who would be aware of this?

In relation to the following quote:



Is someone seriously suggesting that my soul/spirit belongs to someone else? Prove it
I am not sure about criminal but did read that all matters were contract about a year ago and murder was priced at £4 million. No idea for sure though.

It is implied that all parties are aware but again who knows, it needs to be tested.

The Papal Bulls give them (assumed) authority for all time, so that's where they derive their authority to do with you as they will. Really it's a gang of crooks assuming authority over you and your soul.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 11:22 AM   #5
mfrey0118
Senior Member
 
mfrey0118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by he said it was brasso View Post
Interesting post. I look forward to hearing the outcome of a man/woman attempting this in court. Can I assume it is only applicable to commercial matters (civil) or is equally applicable to criminal matters too?

I wonder (assuming this is true) if solicitors are aware of this? Or to put it another way, who would be aware of this?

In relation to the following quote:



Is someone seriously suggesting that my soul/spirit belongs to someone else? Prove it
I believe canon law assumes you've agreed to declare it (as your eternal soul is made by the Divine) as simply property of the Divine, in need of the administration of the Divine's Trustee, the Vicar of Christos, the Pope. From what canon law, in my limited understanding, seems to suggest, at the beginning it wasn't so much about declaring everyone dead. The wording of some of those canons seems to suggest that the Holy See makes an offer, that Divinely created man may, as with all things in the universe, simply be counted as property of the Divine, in multiples of 100 (census, anyone?), thus automatically lowering one's status to beneficiary.
__________________
Deception, by its very nature, is a self-fulfilling prophecy, needing nothing more than a single act of compromise to unleash a fury that will not stop until everything in its path is consumed.

Last edited by mfrey0118; 14-12-2010 at 11:28 AM.
mfrey0118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 01:13 PM   #6
leathal
Senior Member
 
leathal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In the never never.
Posts: 175
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfrey0118 View Post
I believe canon law assumes you've agreed to declare it (as your eternal soul is made by the Divine) as simply property of the Divine, in need of the administration of the Divine's Trustee, the Vicar of Christos, the Pope. From what canon law, in my limited understanding, seems to suggest, at the beginning it wasn't so much about declaring everyone dead. The wording of some of those canons seems to suggest that the Holy See makes an offer, that Divinely created man may, as with all things in the universe, simply be counted as property of the Divine, in multiples of 100 (census, anyone?), thus automatically lowering one's status to beneficiary.

Beneficiary...
Very interesting thread.
All of this talk about trusts, nobody has mentioned the Grantor/Settlor of the trust, I wonder if that is our parents when they sign the regis-tration papers? But then again, if they are already slaves/chattels then it shouldn't be necessary for them to sign us over as trust property, because we are already owned.
God is the grantor/settlor of the divine trust between Him, our Flesh, and our Souls. So how can anyone make a higher claim. A domineering, blood thirsty, power hungry corporate entity posing as "God's Universal Church" that is guilty of all sorts of heineous crimes against humanity and the commandments they claim to uphold certainly doesn't have any claim of right in truth (only in deception). We all know this to be the case anyway, "Nothing stands between myself and the divine" certainly not the blasphemeous "One in Place of Christ". If that ever gets proclaimed as some sort of 'right' over the flesh by the 'ecclesia' then stick this up their noses "1 Tim 2:5; For there is one God, and one MEDIATOR between God and men, the man Christ Jesus"
That mob in Rome seem intent making everyone believe that Jesus is Dead on the Cross when the bible says that he is alive in heaven seated at the right hand of the father.
It really exposes the intent.. death, keep everyone 'dead' then we can control everyone and everything quite nicely thank you very much!
Dwelling peacefully among our fellow Living Spirit Images of God would be much easier without religions interfering.
__________________
LeathaL
leathal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 04:17 PM   #7
h2pogo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 1,187 (670 Posts)
Default

This Trustee business confuses the shit out of me..

who is the trustee?
who is the beneficiary?

I was starting to think as i pay taxes the government is the trustee and acts for the benefit of the beneficiary who is me?
or i entrust the government for my benefit..

but after reading a bit of this post i am obviously wrong

I will read all later when i can give it better attention
h2pogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 05:21 PM   #8
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2pogo View Post
This Trustee business confuses the shit out of me..

who is the trustee?
who is the beneficiary?

I was starting to think as i pay taxes the government is the trustee and acts for the benefit of the beneficiary who is me?
or i entrust the government for my benefit..

but after reading a bit of this post i am obviously wrong

I will read all later when i can give it better attention
No, you are right, but what the government does is put you into trustee position when you admit to being the person. The trustee has all the liability.

Because you have not expressed the trust i.e. not told who is who then the government assumes that it can place you in the position of being the trustee.

This is what they are:
Executor De Son Tort definition: A person who meddles with the estate of a deceased person.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 05:52 PM   #9
h2pogo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,651
Likes: 1,187 (670 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark1963 View Post
No, you are right, but what the government does is put you into trustee position when you admit to being the person. The trustee has all the liability.

Because you have not expressed the trust i.e. not told who is who then the government assumes that it can place you in the position of being the trustee.

This is what they are:
Executor De Son Tort definition: A person who meddles with the estate of a deceased person.
Thanks..That cleared it up a bit..

so if i was in court i could assert i am a living soul and i am receiving no benefit by entrusting the government with my money (taxes) and have no business with them?
How can some one lawfully be forced to do business with a party they do not trust?

still not had chance to read all article..will do so later..looks interesting
h2pogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 06:59 PM   #10
angelthecat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 5 (5 Posts)
Default

ofcourse the judge is the name someone has taken it from you and give it to him as a gift, he then dishonours your name and gives it a liability, and like a hot potatoe he tries to get you to take it back, pure Enocian magic, how do you bring a Ba'al priest into dishonour, easy catch him cheating and then forgive him as a true Ba'al priest should never be caught as his magic should be strong so he should never have a need to be forgiven.

Quote:
Let he be decieved who will'st be decieved
Gen 27:16 And she put the skins of the kids of the goats upon his hands, and upon the smooth of his neck:
Gen 27:17 And she gave the savoury meat and the bread, which she had prepared, into the hand of her son Jacob.
Gen 27:18 And he came unto his father, and said, My father: and he said, Here am I; who art thou, my son?
Gen 27:19 And Jacob said unto his father, I am Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou badest me: arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul may bless me.
Gen 27:20 And Isaac said unto his son, How is it that thou hast found it so quickly, my son? And he said, Because the LORD thy God brought it to me.
Gen 27:21 And Isaac said unto Jacob, Come near, I pray thee, that I may feel thee, my son, whether thou be my very son Esau or not.
Gen 27:22 And Jacob went near unto Isaac his father; and he felt him, and said, The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau.
Gen 27:23 And he discerned him not, because his hands were hairy, as his brother Esau's hands: so he blessed him.
__________________
no politicians were hurt in the making of this war
http://www.davidicke.com/forum overcome the hypnosis
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

Government of this Church to continue without any Alteration to the People of this Land in all succeeding Generations [this was the creation of the UK Government 1706 act of union]

Last edited by angelthecat; 14-12-2010 at 07:00 PM.
angelthecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-12-2010, 07:02 PM   #11
oiram
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost Oz "Unless they oppose it, they will be blamed for it. If they defend it, they are part of it."
Posts: 9,951
Likes: 7 (7 Posts)
Exclamation Sound so typical Luciferian Brain

Quote:
Originally Posted by he said it was brasso View Post
In relation to the following quote:
Is someone seriously suggesting that my soul/spirit belongs to someone else? Prove it
Quote:
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
Please.....Prove it to me too.

First time I heard this one. >> Is this for real or just a joke?
Sound so typical arrogance Luciferian Brain.


Also how can they place claim on some thing not even knowing what it is?

Also if they would know what it is they clearly would know that they can not kill it or claim it.

This proves to me that the once creating such stupid scams are totally Soulless & brain dead.

Just look at the arrogant wording they are use "claiming and possessing" ... you know what it proves they are jealous idiots. The think by claiming it with some words written somewhere they can possess some-once spirit & soul. How stupid & it's the proof they don't have it!


Last edited by oiram; 14-12-2010 at 07:18 PM.
oiram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2010, 05:44 PM   #12
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oiram View Post

Please.....Prove it to me too.

First time I heard this one. >> Is this for real or just a joke?
Sound so typical arrogance Luciferian Brain.


Also how can they place claim on some thing not even knowing what it is?

Also if they would know what it is they clearly would know that they can not kill it or claim it.

This proves to me that the once creating such stupid scams are totally Soulless & brain dead.

Just look at the arrogant wording they are use "claiming and possessing" ... you know what it proves they are jealous idiots. The think by claiming it with some words written somewhere they can possess some-once spirit & soul. How stupid & it's the proof they don't have it!

The deception is how the Roman Church was able to kill 10 million in the Inquisition with supposed authority from God.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2010, 06:46 PM   #13
girlgye
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a land that needs to wake up
Posts: 5,509
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by he said it was brasso View Post
Interesting post. I look forward to hearing the outcome of a man/woman attempting this in court. Can I assume it is only applicable to commercial matters (civil) or is equally applicable to criminal matters too?

I wonder (assuming this is true) if solicitors are aware of this? Or to put it another way, who would be aware of this?

In relation to the following quote:



Is someone seriously suggesting that my soul/spirit belongs to someone else? Prove it
I have applied it to my case and posted it up on Thinkfreeforums 6 months before it was brutally torn down by that maggot.

The outcome so far and it is not over is 'we have no idea what you are talking about'.

This was at a time when that was about the only remedy JB could come up with at the time.

Now it is 'you gave your DNA purposefully, you purposefully laid down and threw yourself to the ground'.

The facts are I was pinned to the floor, kneed in the ribs and face forced the side whereupon they forced a swab from my mouth. Fairplay to my unknown determination not to comply it took them some time to get it and they were exhausted by the end of it.

But they say I purposely gave it to them.

Given it is from a third party interloper it got sent back refused for cause and the matter is still in progress.

Unlike Mary I want my rightful entitlement from all my forebearers and estimate the cost to be billions for the grand deception they have placed incumbent upon me and my kin.

Last edited by girlgye; 15-12-2010 at 06:49 PM.
girlgye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-12-2010, 09:48 PM   #14
earthicastar
Senior Member
 
earthicastar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: without GPS can be difficult
Posts: 647
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

If they consider me deceased, then I want the guy that murdered me to stand trial
earthicastar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-12-2010, 10:39 PM   #15
girlgye
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a land that needs to wake up
Posts: 5,509
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by earthicastar View Post
If they consider me deceased, then I want the guy that murdered me to stand trial
And pay.
girlgye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2010, 01:18 PM   #16
yozhik
Senior Member
 
yozhik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Privately
Posts: 11,411
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

you weren't murdered.
death can be done with a simple declaration.
remember; the pen is mightier than the sword.
here you are with presumptions made
seven years gone, your life doth fade
a vassal, a vessel, no flicker, nor flame,
no weapon, no blood, noone to blame.

naive and a ward, your silence your deed
not educated, not mentored, learn this; take heed
t'was issued, not given - the name is the beast
the created person upon which parasites feast

fee, fief o'er farm; black, white, inner, utter
know your place, pawn! ... seldom higher than gutter
King's pawn takes your castle, I believe that's checkmate?
Bishop's pawn stands laughing, witnessing your fate.
__________________
Anarchism stands for liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from shackles and restraint of government. It stands for social order based on the free grouping of individuals.
It [...] maintains that God, the State, and society are non-existent, that their promises are null and void, since they can be fulfilled only through man's subordination.


- Emma Goldman

Last edited by yozhik; 17-12-2010 at 05:12 PM. Reason: various typos
yozhik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2010, 02:44 PM   #17
he said it was brasso
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 848
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yozhik View Post
you weren't murdered.
death can be done with a simple declaration.
remember; the pen is mightier than the sword.
here you are with presumptions made
seven years gone, your life doth fade
a vassal, a vessel, no flicker, no flame,
no weapon, no blood, noone to blame.

naive and a ward, your silence your deed
not educated, not mentored, learn this; take heed
t'was issued, not given - the name is the beast
the created person upon which parasites feast

fee, fief o'er farm; black, white, inner, utter
know your place, pawn - seldom higher than gutter
King's pawn takes your castle, I believe thats checkmate
Bishop's pawn stands laughing, witnessing your fate.
Beautiful. Did you write that?
he said it was brasso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2010, 03:21 PM   #18
mark1963
Senior Member
 
mark1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 49 (20 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yozhik View Post
you weren't murdered.
death can be done with a simple declaration.
remember; the pen is mightier than the sword.
here you are with presumptions made
seven years gone, your life doth fade
a vassal, a vessel, no flicker, no flame,
no weapon, no blood, noone to blame.

naive and a ward, your silence your deed
not educated, not mentored, learn this; take heed
t'was issued, not given - the name is the beast
the created person upon which parasites feast

fee, fief o'er farm; black, white, inner, utter
know your place, pawn - seldom higher than gutter
King's pawn takes your castle, I believe thats checkmate
Bishop's pawn stands laughing, witnessing your fate.
Excellent.
__________________
“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die; so, let us all be thankful.” - Buddha

www.thrivingaudios.com
mark1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2010, 06:24 PM   #19
theabominablephenomenon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The flightpath estate
Posts: 15,095
Likes: 4 (3 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yozhik View Post
you weren't murdered.
death can be done with a simple declaration.
remember; the pen is mightier than the sword.
here you are with presumptions made
seven years gone, your life doth fade
a vassal, a vessel, no flicker, nor flame,
no weapon, no blood, noone to blame.

naive and a ward, your silence your deed
not educated, not mentored, learn this; take heed
t'was issued, not given - the name is the beast
the created person upon which parasites feast

fee, fief o'er farm; black, white, inner, utter
know your place, pawn! ... seldom higher than gutter
King's pawn takes your castle, I believe that's checkmate?
Bishop's pawn stands laughing, witnessing your fate.
Skillfully crafted.
The Freemasons and their checkered game...
theabominablephenomenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2010, 08:58 PM   #20
girlgye
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: In a land that needs to wake up
Posts: 5,509
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Yes great minds think alike. Amazing Yoz.

We have a bit of a bard here.

Quote:
From Freedomfiles.

In The Beginning God created the heaven and the earth...
And evil people created Persons. The word Person comes from the Latin word Persona, which means mask. A Person is a fictional entity in an imaginary world. It does not and cannot exist in the reality where you and I live. A PERSON has two attributes, a Name and a Birth Date, both of which are hearsay. Law books have skewed the definition to include corporations as being a Person, which is the crux of the Fraud and the truth of the illusion. A Corporation cannot be a man created male or female by God. A human being is not a living man created male or female by God, human means Color of man and thus is not a species of man of God. Corporations exist in an imaginary world, we do not. The idea of there being a natural or artificial Persons being the same as a man created male or female by God is a fraud, for a Natural Person is a person, thus a fiction with some fictional attributes. It is also important to note that a man created male or female by God is only a reference point from the King James Bible, in terms of LAW franchised from the BAR in THE CITY OF LONDON. This is the best way to describe ourselves in relation to that fraud, for they make use of the King James Bible, although it is truly the Torah and the Talmud, but we’ll get into that later.


The foundation of all LAW on the planet is to fraudulently equate a PERSON, a fictional entity, as being a man created male or female by God. The main trick that they use is to attempt to get you to sign on fraudulently as a SURETY for the PERSON and thus whatever they do in their imaginary world, they can do to you as the SURETY. Thus because it is an imaginary world they are indemnifying themselves from what they do to you through fraudulent contracts. It is a scam. There is hope though in that by learning the truth you can set yourself free. In time we will all be free, but it will take time. The simple foundation of PERSON is that they want you to buy into the fact that a PERSON is the same as a fictional entity called a CORPORATION, and as such a Corporation can have GOD status over us, like a Country or Government has. Thus, because we can create then it is okay to say that fictional entities can create, and therein is the foundation of the Tyranny, in that we are considered to be imaginary things.




Last edited by girlgye; 17-12-2010 at 10:07 PM.
girlgye is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.