Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Earth Changes / Global Warming / Chemtrails / Weather Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2014, 08:30 PM   #1
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default One simple theory

that anyone will understand unless being a scientist.

They have disrupted the submarine currents, not only the Gulf Stream but by repercussion the all of them. As a consequence there is no more regulation of the climate, some that refuse to buy into the warming prefering to talk about change or disruption. Such a phenomenon is irreversible otherwise than by remaking the Earth starting from the big bang or whatever created our planet.

How did we do that ? There was only one way to freeze these currents, and it's by dint of doing again and again what the scientists thought had no effect on a global scale, or whether they knew but never cared. One submarine nuclear test means few or nothing, but two hundreds of them within restricted area and period of time can't but end up mixing warm and cold currents together into one. Such is the climate we're experiencing with ice meltdown at the poles and cold waves like we had never known before in tempered areas. Now the temperature differences that once kept the currents moving disappeared, which is why the freezing.

We're being witnessing the globalization of the climate, the outcome of which will be one single season everywhere. What will life on Earth feel like then ? That's what they're slowly getting us accustomed with by showing us apocalyptic-like atmospheric conditions in movies or video games.

Again it's irreversible. Dip a spoon into a cocktail and shake it, then try to remake the liquids into layers as they were before. You must empty your glass and make another drink.
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 09:57 PM   #2
thermion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 922 (603 Posts)
Default

Perhaps you'd like to rephrase all of that for the hard of thinking...?

thermion
thermion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 11:20 PM   #3
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

firecracker in Irish Coffee


chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2014, 05:22 PM   #4
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default sorry to bump this highly uninteresting thread but

what's the problem with what I've written ? English not my birth tongue I precise, and that will be done.

I proposed that the so-called 'warming' not be one, that the climate was being 'globalizing' just like every aspect of the human life in the two past centuries. Is it Nature mimicking Mankind or the other way round I don't know, but it does make sense in some way, doesn't it ?

Then I proposed that the cause of such a climate globalization or standardisation be the disruption of the thermohaline circulation by the undersea nuclear tests in the Pacific, and I took as an illustration the exemple of a cocktail made of several layers in a glass. The layers hold in place because of the difference in the consistency of the liquids, which is the same undersea according to the salinity of water. So I concluded that since you couldn't remake the layers in the glass after having shaked the cocktail with a spoon, I saw no reason why we could restore the disrupted thermohaline circulation in the oceans. Does it make sense to anyone ?

as usually I'll be called an idiot and within a few months some famous scientist will come up with the same conclusion, write a book and won the Nobel Prize while I'll be still rotting in my cellar.
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 08:12 PM   #5
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

It's 200 French nuclear tests within 30 years until 1996.

Mururoa is located right in the middle of the Pacific where the South Equatorial current is running. Up to how many miles high has a nuke an impact on the atmosphere ? How many miles down will it reach undersea where water conduction worsens the phenomenon ?

Is the South Equatorial current disrupted and then it's the Antartic Circumpolar that's slowered too. How far may it end up affecting the climate after such a disruption happened 200 times in 30 years ?

Just wondering...
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 08:50 PM   #6
cosmic tramp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 2,707 (1,758 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chud66 View Post
that anyone will understand unless being a scientist.

They have disrupted the submarine currents, not only the Gulf Stream but by repercussion the all of them. As a consequence there is no more regulation of the climate, some that refuse to buy into the warming prefering to talk about change or disruption. Such a phenomenon is irreversible otherwise than by remaking the Earth starting from the big bang or whatever created our planet.

How did we do that ? There was only one way to freeze these currents, and it's by dint of doing again and again what the scientists thought had no effect on a global scale, or whether they knew but never cared. One submarine nuclear test means few or nothing, but two hundreds of them within restricted area and period of time can't but end up mixing warm and cold currents together into one. Such is the climate we're experiencing with ice meltdown at the poles and cold waves like we had never known before in tempered areas. Now the temperature differences that once kept the currents moving disappeared, which is why the freezing.

We're being witnessing the globalization of the climate, the outcome of which will be one single season everywhere. What will life on Earth feel like then ? That's what they're slowly getting us accustomed with by showing us apocalyptic-like atmospheric conditions in movies or video games.

Again it's irreversible. Dip a spoon into a cocktail and shake it, then try to remake the liquids into layers as they were before. You must empty your glass and make another drink.
This sounds to me like it belongs in New Scientist magazine for consideration, in their "Last Word" (readers' letters) pages. Seriously. You should send it in. Have a look at this example:

http://www.newscientist.com/topic/lastword/nutty-water
cosmic tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 09:07 PM   #7
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

that's not kind to make fun of me. :|

I trust you were not being sarcastic but anyway I just don't mind handing it to a magazine. Only thing I could do would be to write it down and get a book published, but such a subject as climatology would kill me by boredom before I get it done. I thought I might just share on this forum as I've been thinking of that 'theory' for some time already. But you might be right, perhaps the fact it has never been put forward by scientists means that they all know but won't tell. When you hear them switch furtively from 'warming' to 'change' and you learn that the Gulf Stream has stopped, then you start making connections.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltfxuhpBkOM

just one link I just picked randomly...
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2014, 10:34 PM   #8
cosmic tramp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 2,707 (1,758 Posts)
Default

Sorry chud66 'twas not my intent to make fun, it's just that I do go on other sites besides this one and was dying for an excuse to share that most bizarre link with everyone as I'd just been on New Scientist.

You do have a very valid point there and I seriously think you should put it under the
New Scientist nose...I would like to see them put on the spot. They are very good usually, those 'Last Word' letters do attract a lot of specialists in their replies which are usually very thorough and considered.

Just seen the Philippines annual Hurricane warning on the news, a bit like Iranian earthquakes a lot of these freak environmental 'events' seem too 'strategically placed' to be pure happenstance.

Last edited by cosmic tramp; 08-12-2014 at 06:37 PM.
cosmic tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 06:23 PM   #9
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

what a stupid reaction... deleted my own reply out of shame...

to my defence this thread had been staying unresponded for days so that I's starting to wonder whether it was not complete BS...

I followed your advice and prompted my 'theory' to New Scientist by email, will watch out for a possible reaction and let you know...
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 06:36 PM   #10
cosmic tramp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 2,707 (1,758 Posts)
Default

Good work.
cosmic tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 08:37 PM   #11
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 08:51 PM   #12
andy1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 1,537 (885 Posts)
Default

What i love about hydrogen bomb vids, is that it seems to stop time. I love the fact that hydrogen bombs are far too complicated for humans to understand.

But personally from hydrogen bomb vids, i love the sense that it just stops time for a blink of a second, it is so powerful. Humans still cannot work out the explosion, lol. I wonder what really happens as those explosions happen.

Good example, of humans over estimating there intelligence.

I heard phil schneider say it ripped a hole through space and time on one pic, that humans did not know what part of space they were looking at, lol
__________________
"You put 10 tonnes of proof in front of people, if they are not ready to accept an idea, they will not accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury."
William Cooper - behold a pale horse video
^^
So true
andy1033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 09:00 PM   #13
chud66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 181 (119 Posts)
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjnm3V0xYjI
chud66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.