Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Thread Tools
Old 19-06-2016, 02:43 PM   #1
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default AIDS: AZT Induced Death Sentence

When speaking about genocide most people don’t think about hospitals or the World Health Organization (WHO). This topic is broader than only the AIDS hoax, I will also present information on Legionaires’ disease, Polio vaccination and Agenda21.

Just reading the ridicilous story on AIDS, how can anybody believe this? After people get infected with the HIV virus – only by blood or sperm - the virus lays dormant for years and then suddenly destroys the immunicy system of the infected who die, not of HIV, but of “normal” diseases because the immunicy system cannot protect the body anymore.
On the following 2 sites information on the making of AIDS from the USA:
There are not only thousands of cases of HIV-positives that never develop AIDS, but even of AIDS without HIV: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/kmreason.htm
In 1970 Dr. MacArthur was supplied with $10 million from the Department of Defense (DoD) to “produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired”.
On July 30th, 1977, the United States’ congress annotated Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 for the DoD, that states that chemical and biological agents can be tested on humans: “a) Not later than thirty days after final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense, whether directly or under contract, involving the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, the Secretary of Defense shall supply the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives with a full accounting of such plans for such experiment or study, and such experiment or study may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date such accounting is received by such committees”. Only after this law was discussed on national radio it was (partly) prohibited in 1998 by Section 1078 for the DoD.
In 1978 advertisements in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco were issued specifically asking for promiscuous homosexuals. In 1981 the first stories appeared about AIDS in homosexuals from the New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco areas.
In 1986 and 1987 AZT was approved rapidly, first in Great Britain, and then the USA. The commissions approving AZT had a lot of decision makers with financial ties to Burroughs Wellcome (the manufacturer of AZT). John Lauritsen used the Freedom of Information Act to get information on the phases I en II trials in the USA and found the evaluation of Ellen Cooper to conclude that many died in these trials on AZT. Burroughs is fully owned by the Wellcome trust, at the time controlled by Lord Oliver Franks, among others director of the Rockefeller Foundation.
Reports on medical research have been published that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, but people die because of AZT and the HIV-tests are not reliable. You can read these next two scientific reports:
E. Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al “Is a Positive Western Blot Proof of HIV Infection” (1993): http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epwbtest.htm
Seligmann et al “Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial ...” (1994): http://davidcrowe.ca/SciHealthEnv/pa...3-Concorde.pdf
In 1994 by court order they prevented that the book “Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS” of Bryan J. Elison and Dr. Peter Duesberg was published (of course freedom of the press means censorship). Duesberg has published several books to warn about AZT.

Another example of a disease invented by man is Legionnaires’ disease: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legionnaires%27_disease
Legionnaires’ disease is maybe even stranger than AIDS. You can get it by breathing mist that contains the Legionella bacteria (but not by drinking water with the bacteria or by contact with invected people). Often people get sick during holidays, thus during their travel or in the hotel. According to Wikipedia all the large outbreaks have been in the developed world: 1976 Philadelphia (USA), 1985 Stafford (GB), 1999 Bovenkarspel (Netherlands), 2000 Melbourne (Australia), 2001 Murcia (Spain), 2002 Barrow-in-Furness (GB), 2005 Toronto (Canada), 2012 Quebec (Canada), 2012 Edinburgh (GB), 2014 Lissabon (Portugal), 2015 New York (USA), 2015 Quincy (USA), 2015/2016 Flint (USA).
From the facts on the first outbreak in 1976 (among legionnaires) at the Bellevue Stratford hotel in Philadelphia it is clear that this disease is not caused by a bacteria. F. William Sunderman reported that Nickel carbonyl was the probable cause: www.annclinlabsci.org/content/7/3/187.full.pdf
Sunderman was informed of this possibility by an anonymous letter, with a warning about Nickel carbonyl. Sunderman had sent the letter to the FBI by August 2, 1976. The FBI only investigated this, after Jack Anderson on October 28 published an article:
One of the expected effects of Nickel carbonyl poisoning is a high level of nickel. Dr. Jerrold Abraham found high concentrations of nickel in the lungs of the victims of Legionnaires’ disease, but not in the kidneys. The conclusion must be that the legionaires were poisoned by Nickel carbonyl through inhalation. The state invented another explanation – that metal autopsy instruments were the source of nickel in the lungs. How ridiculous this explanation is: the autopsy of the control group and of the kidneys of the victims of Legionnaires’ disease were performed with the same kind of instruments: http://www.biostat.umn.edu/~brad/645...egionnaire.pdf
The symptoms of an infection with the Legionella bacteria are even known: Pontiac fever. It only causes a fever for a few days, with no dangerous health hazards. Because of all the “preventive” measures: the number of victims of Legionaires’ disease is steadily increasing.

Vaccination is a perfect way not only to murder children but to test chemical and biological weapons.
In 1997 the WHO and UNICEF introduced the National Immunization Days in Uganda. After many dead children and Kihura Nkuba discussing this on his radio shows, revolts broke out. The army of Uganda was used to vaccinate children with polio. Nkuba reported he had a terrible car crash, when two pick-up trucks forced him off the road. See: http://www.whale.to/a/nkuba.htm
Member of Bilderberg Melinda Gates, wife of the not richest man in the world, founded the “Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” that is trying to get “wild polio” out of this world. Apparently it is really bad when (only) several hundreds of children die of “wild polio”, so ten thousands of children in India get paralysed by Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis (NPAFP), caused by the vaccine. See: http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/08/bill-gate...ralysis-death/
Bill Gates has clarified why he is so concerned that children don’t get vaccinated: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent”.

You might expect that the elite hides their plans to get rid of billions of people. All of the following filthy rich swine have stressed that eugenetics is necessary or the world population must be reduced: Sir Julian Huxley (founder of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and brother of Aldous Huxley), Prince Philip (husband of Queen Elizabeth) and Thomas Ferguson (Latin American case officer for the US Office of Population Affairs). The Georgia Guidestones were revealed on March 22, 1980 of which the first guideline reads: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”.
Robert McNamara was secretary of state for the DoD from 1961 -1969 when the plans to develop the biological agent for which no natural immunity could have been acquired were made (in 1969 he became chairman of the World bank and later joined the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI)). Here’s a famous quote from McNamara: "It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way".
There have also been reports to warn against the overpopulation: “Toward balanced growth: Quantity with quality” (1970), “Report of the Commission on population growth” (1972), “The limits to growth” (1972) and “GLOBAL 2000” (1980).
On the ECO-92 summit a document was presented by the Cobden Clubs, stating that the UN must enforce reduction of the world population (leading to Agenda 21):
A. The Security Council of the U.N., led by the Anglo-Saxon Major Nation powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations that its suffrance on population has ended, that all nations have quotas for REDUCTION on a y early basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military force, when required
Negative Population Growth was founded in 1972, to reduce the world population, see their website: http://www.npg.org/

Murder by inventing diseases comes straight out of the Protocols of the elders of Zion, see protocol 15: “9. Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS..... Knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn dare not protest. By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of MASONRY the very root of protest against our disposition. While preaching liberalism to the GOY we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioningly submission”.

Last edited by St Jimmy; 19-06-2016 at 02:44 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2016, 06:32 PM   #2
dr steam
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 382 (234 Posts)

Interesting post, welcome aboard St Jimmy

"To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself.”
― Timothy Leary
Likes: (1)
dr steam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 03:02 PM   #3
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)

Of course there’s a lot more on AIDS.
The following book is about the invention of AIDS; Horowitz - EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS & EBOLA (1996): http://ethosworld.com/library/Leonar...%281996%29.pdf
Horowitz argues that Dr. Robert Gallo was making a virus like HIV/AIDS from Fort Detrick for many years. Gallo was one of the first (independent from Dr. Luc Montagnier) to “discover” HIV in 1984. From 1943 on Fort Detrick was the most advanced Biological and Chemical weapon producer in the USA. In 1971 the lion's share of the activities in Fort Detrick was for the National Institute “for” Health (NIH). In 1971 president Nixon hailed Gallo for discovering that leukaemia is caused by an RNA-retrovirus. Horrowitz follows most arguments of Dr. Robert B. Strecker; see The Strecker Memorandum (1988): http://rapeutation.com/streckermemoscreenplay.pdf
Strecker claims that the “AIDS virus” is a retrovirus that´s been made (by man) by combining bovine leukaemia virus of cattle and visna virus of sheep. When Horrowitz found reports from Gallo from 1971, 1972 about modifying simian monkey virus by infusing them with cat leukaemia RNA, he thinks this is like making cancers as seen in people with AIDS. I couldn´t download these for free: Gallo et al “A common change aspartyl-tRNA in polyoma and SV transformed cells” (1972) and Gallo et al “Reverse transcriptase in type C virus particles of human origin” (1971). I did find this from Gallo et al, about creating cancers; “Aminoacyl transfer RNA profilesin human myeloma cells” (1971): http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/...2/246.full.pdf
Another interesting name is George W. Merck, a key member of the panel advising President Franklin D. Roosevelt on biological warfare in the 1940s. Merck’s pharmaceutical company was involved in the experimental hepatitis B vaccine for the promiscuous homosexuals that later developed AIDS.
Both Horowitz and Strecker claim that HIV is the cause of AIDS. That this cannot be true follows from the arguments from Strecker. Latex in condoms has holes of 3 micrometer, while the HIV virus is only 1 micrometer (so a condom doesn’t stop AIDS). But Strecker tells not to worry about sex, because HIV was never identified in semen. Strecker further explains that HIV has been found in saliva (HIV tests analyse saliva), so AIDS could be transferred by coughing or sneezing. The elite wouldn’t allow a virus that could infect themselves to reduce the population; so AIDS cannot be caused by HIV.
Even Montagnier is convinced that HIV alone doesn’t cause AIDS.

I’ve found an interesting bunch of information, 360 pages and over 1250 references on the influence of media on AIDS research (but without Horowitz and Strecker). If you want to investigate AIDS yourself this could be a starting point: http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpresse...&brand=ucpress
The “AZT” medicine for AIDS was already discovered in the 1960s by Jerome Horwitz but rejected as chemotherapy for cancer. In 1993 came a giant step for mankind in the treatment to AIDS with the results from the Margaret Fischl study comparing AZT and ddC (without placebo); the results were that 42% on AZT, 43% on ddC and 39% on AZT/ddC had progressed to serious illness or death. So from 1995 on the cocktail ARV (combining AZT and ddC) was given to AIDS victims and the death rate dropped (ddC is less toxic than AZT).

Here are some quotes from the elite on the need for eugenetics (by reducing reproduction, by condoms for example, or by increasing the death rate).
Sir Julian Huxley (1941): “If so, then we must plan our eugenic policy along some such lines as the following:... The lowest strata, allegedly less well-endowed genetically, are reproducing relatively too fast. Therefore birth-control methods must be taught them; they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilization, or at least relief should be contingent upon no further children being brought into the world; and so on. That is to say, much of our eugenic programme will be curative and remedial merely, instead of preventive and constructive”.
Thomas Ferguson: “There is a single theme in all our work - we must reduce population levels. Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it”.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2016, 03:51 PM   #4
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Neville Hodgkinson on AIDS

I found more interesting information on AIDS; Neville Hodgkinson - AIDS: Scientific or Viral Catastrophe? (2003): http://www.immunity.org.uk/wp-conten...cE-article.pdf
Reading the story of Hodgkinson made me think back about all the horrible stories by the state propaganda about the expected epidemic caused by AIDS. It must be clear to everybody (even if you believe AIDS is caused by HIV) that these stories were bogus and to create hysteria. Of course over time the information about AIDS changed (when lies are exposed the media just invents new stories).

In one study 50 out of 75 children in Uganda in 1972/1973 were HIV-positive (67%); so you’d expect the same percentage of HIV-positive adults (and since 1972/1973 steadily rising). I remember stories that in some African countries more than 50% are HIV-positive. If this were true, you’d expect a lower world population of humans than of rhino’s (an estimated 29,000). Saxinger et al, Evidence for exposure to HTLV-III in Uganda before 1973 (1985): http://www.harvard.epiinformatics.co...Antibodies.pdf
In 1985 the UK’s Royal College of Nursing predicted that one million people in Britain ‘‘will have AIDS in six years unless the killer disease is checked’’, in 2000 the official number of AIDS deaths totalled 263.
In Africa doctors are allowed to diagnose AIDS by symptoms like fever, cough, diarrhoea, or weight loss — the so-called Bangui clinical case definition. So in Africa diseases like malaria, tuberculosis or dysentery can be conveniently diagnosed as AIDS.
In nature monkeys do not develop AIDS after being infected with HIV; Silvestri et al, Understanding the benign nature of SIV infection in natural hosts (2007): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...JCI0733034.pdf

According to 2 European studies from 2011 the most common causes of deaths in HIV-positive victims are not AIDS but cancer and liver failure (since AZT isn’t a monotherapy anymore but only part of the ART cocktail the death rate has decreased substantially): https://www.poz.com/article/hiv-deat...ity-20011-5126
In the following study 167 deaths occurred among 9,583 HIV-positive subjects; only 54 of these deaths were related to AIDS (32%). Neuhaus et al, Risk of All-cause Mortality Associated with Non-fatal AIDS and Serious Non-AIDS Events among Adults Infected with HIV (2011):
Several studies show that much more children born to mothers poisoned with AZT in pregnancy get severely sick and die than of untreated (HIV-positive) mothers. Rapid disease progression in HIV-1 perinatally infected children born to mothers receiving zidovudinemonotherapy during pregnancy (1999): http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/p...&type=abstract

Over the years some HIV-positive victims didn’t take drugs, see the following quotes.
Dr. David Berner (1995): “Reflecting back on the numbers of diseases I treated in the fifties and sixties which now would be grounds for malpractice, I became skeptical about AZT, knowing it to be a cytotoxic agent.”
“I had the temerity to give [Duesberg] a call. I’ll never forget his initial remark. I told him my plight, and he said, ‘If you take AZT, you’ll be dead.’ I read his work and got introduced to other people who were skeptical about AZT.”
“I decided early on to add some vitamin therapies to my already healthy lifestyle, particularly the anti-oxidants beta carotene, ascorbic acid, and vitamin E. Despite my continuing excellent health for a 69 year old — I do a lot of hiking and mountaineering in the wilderness — I have still been pressured by well-meaning clinicians to start AZT ‘before it’s too late!’ I think it’s very difficult for these people to admit that they’re either partially or completely wrong

Robert Bryant (1998): “Before Ryan White *) there was me. Same doctors, same hospital… [They told me to] take AZT... I said no to the doctors and I am alive. I have been black-balled by the press which made a hero out of White (…)
Some people have said that the virus does exist but it’s a harmless one. You’ll test positive for it, but it won’t cause any harm. I’m inclined to believe that. Because I’m not sick. It hasn’t hurt me, and it hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] brothers, and it hasn’t hurt my [HIV+] uncles. And it hasn’t hurt their kids, and it hasn’t hurt their wives
”. *) Ryan White was a hemophiliac who died in April of 1990 of unstoppable internal bleeding after taking AZT.
Dr. Scott Gottlieb: “I was prescribed four days of ‘triple therapy’ with the latest protease inhibitors and other antiviral medicines… But those four days left me with a realistic view of what infected patients often face. Between nausea and aching pains in my bones, I felt febrile and weak. I was unable to exercise. After one day, I was no longer well enough to work, to go out with my friends or to eat a full meal without vomiting. While it is true that over time some people are able to tolerate the drugs better than others, for many patients these symptoms never go away. Many doctors and the pharmaceutical industry have failed to convey the human toll that ‘triple therapy’ takes…
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 03:24 PM   #5
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Multivitamins

Can it really be this simple? Nutritional supplements with multivitamins are not only an effective medicine against AIDS, but also for other diseases. Not unimportant: multivitamins have no major adverse side effects (although the effects of Vitamin A in HIV-positive pregnant women needs to be studied) and are cheap (just the other day I bought 360 days worth of multivitamin pills for a total cost of 8 euro, some 15 cents per week).
Multivitamins are known to have beneficial effects also on other diseases.

In the following 2 year study HIV-positive adults (without AIDS) were given multivitamins, selenium or placebo (so they didn’t get the AZT or ARV). With multivitamins only 8% progressed to worse health, while on selenium 12% and placebo 15% deteriorated.
Baum et al, Effect of Micronutrient Supplementation … Botswana (2013): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...hms-664120.pdf

In this study 1078 HIV-positive pregnant women infected with HIV in Tanzania, were given either multivitamins, vitamin A or placebo. Multivitamins resulted in less progression to stage 4 of AIDS or death: multivitamins 67 of 271 (24.7%); multivitamins/vitamin A 70 of 268 (26.1%); vitamin A 79 of 272 (29.0%); placebo 83 of 267 (31.1%). Multivitamins also had positive effects on CD4 and CD8 cell counts (higher); viral loads (lower); oral and gastrointestinal manifestations, dysentery, fatigue, rash, and acute upper respiratory tract infections (reduced). The beneficial effects of multivitamins were still apparent after 4 years.
Fawzi et al, A trial multivitamin supplements and HIV … (2004): http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa040541

In this study the efficacy of micronutrients (including vitamins) was tested in sick AIDS-victims that were poisoned with ARV. The death rate was significantly lower in the micronutrients group 8 (of 242) as compared to the placebo group 15 (of 239). There were less hospital admittances in the micronutrients group 16, while 20 in the placebo group. There were less minor adverse effects in the micronutrients group 64, 73 in the placebo group.
Jiamton et al, Micronutrient supplementation on mortality HIV-infected … Bangkok (2003): http://journals.lww.com/aidsonline/p...&type=abstract
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-08-2016, 05:08 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 229
Likes: 121 (79 Posts)

Who has seen the film Dallas Buyers Club [2013]?
tommorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2016, 04:18 PM   #7
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Duesberg, Bayer, censorship

Probably the most important whistleblower on AIDS is Peter Duesberg. In the following article Duesberg explains that because the AIDS epidemic didn’t spread exponentially, a virus like HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS: http://www.duesberg.com/subject/africa2.html

Bizarrely Bayer paid to settle law suits for more than 600 million dollar because they sold tainted blood with the “AIDS virus” to keep the public from finding out that AIDS is not caused by HIV: http://anonhq.com/yes-bayer-drug-kno...ed-people-hiv/

Once again I’ve got evidence that internet is censored.
I’ve written a story with so many topics that it should be easy to find in a regular internet search “The totalitarian state”: http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=713
I’ve searched with Google.nl and the following 5 searches should find my thread, but none of them do:
1. “Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership Treaty (TTIP) banana republics General Agreement on Tariffs in Services (GATS) Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Hugo Chávez Nicolás Maduro cash reserve ratio LuxLeaks Horowitz Montagnier aspartyl-tRNA Merck Julian Huxley”
2. “Neville Hodgkinson Saxinger Silvestri Neuhaus Gottlieb multivitamins selenium Fawzi Jiamton Perkins Omar Torrijos Jaime Roldos Aguiler Roberto Diaz Herrera Alberto Purcell TckTckTck astroturfers Michael Moore Judicial watch BCOAR”
3. “Bureau Alcohol Tobacco Firearms (BATF) Branch Davidians Nixon Protocols Zion Verizon Strub Biskind Benghazi Bryan Suits al-Baghdadi Simon Elliot Bonwit Teller”
4. “Atlantic imprisoned Jeffrey Edward Epstein Dershowitz Ghislaine Maxwell Goldman Sachs Mezvinsky Eaglevale Bannon Société Générale Riady Joseph Giroir Lippo”
5. “deGrasse Kuwait-American Glassner Yemen Armitage McIntyre ACARS Cleary Sammartino Stavely exif Bingham Cantor Marsh Mclennan Daschle Hatfill Duley Tylenol BioPort Schwartzman Battelle Matsumuto TABD Samuel Soria Korry Chugach Polasek Littlechild PowerGen”

Last edited by st jimmy; 03-10-2016 at 04:19 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2016, 02:17 PM   #8
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Duesberg - Inventing The AIDS Virus

This post is not a full summary of the 724 pages (37MB to download) of the book “Inventing The AIDS Virus” (1996) by Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison: http://dlx.bookzz.org/genesis/115500...ookZZ.org).pdf
I will only write the most important additional information on AIDS not already in this thread and refer to the author as Duesberg. I’ll add some links that have the benefit of brevity over the book (if you intend to read the book this doesn’t add much).
The real book is “only” the first 467 pages of the PDF, the rest of the book are appendices (that don’t add much), Notes and the Index.

To understand the true nature of AIDS it is helpful to distinguish between the 4 separate groups that have developed AIDS in high numbers: 1) Promiscuous homosexuals; 2) Drug addicts; 3) Haemophiliacs; 4) Africans.
Duesberg states that the cause of AIDS is drug use. He explains that all of the homosexuals were heavy users of (recreational) drugs; he specifically names “nitrite". While Duesberg makes strong arguments that drugs are the culprit, the real cause is more sinister. It is known that as part of the CIAs MKULTRA program experimental drugs were tested on unsuspecting people. I don’t think it’s too farfetched to conclude that the AIDS-victims were intentionally poisoned by putting some chemical weapon into their drugs. Then after they became ill the “AIDS-medicines” finish them off.
Duesberg specifically names that there were some 30 known Immune deficiency diseases, before AIDS was invented, that are since being labelled AIDS. He also specifically names that haemophiliacs suffered from immune deficiencies long before AIDS. The AIDS-syndrome includes the following diseases: brain dementia, diarrhoea, cancers (like Kaposi's sarcoma and cervical cancer), several lymphomas, pneumonia, cytomegalovirus infection, herpes, candidiasis and tuberculosis. Even low T-cell counts without clinical symptoms can be called "AIDS".
Duesberg unfortunately ignores the genocide against Africans under the guise of AIDS. He simply states that other death causes are labelled as AIDS.
Roughly 360,000 HIV positive Haitians have produced only a few hundred AIDS victims.

Duesberg frequently refers to the fact that Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as the cause of AIDS doesn’t meet the 4 scientific criteria of Koch’s postulates: 1) The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms; 2) The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture; 3) The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism; 4) The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.
On Wikipedia you can read that the state propaganda has simply thrown these scientific standards aside with “Koch’s postulates for the 21st century”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates
The failure to kill T-cells, even under optimal conditions, is the Achilles' heel of the theory that HIV causes AIDS. The abundance of uninfected T-cells in AIDS patients is possibly the most important evidence against the many false claims for high viral "loads" or "burdens" in AIDS victims.

The mere fact that since the beginning of “AIDS” the epidemic has never really spread beyond the risk groups is evidence that the HIV virus doesn’t cause AIDS. If HIV would have been the cause of AIDS - and is sexually transmittable - in 10 years practically the whole world population would have been infected with HIV (so if you can read this, the official story was a lie).
After the immune system has made antibodies against HIV, it becomes dormant and can only infect the partner in unprotected sex in 1 out of 1000 cases. On the other hand: a pregnant mother has at least a 50% chance of passing HIV to the unborn baby.
There are some 5,000 wives of HIV-positive haemophiliacs in the USA. About 131 of these women have developed AIDS from 1985 to 1992 (2.6%).
Another interesting brain teaser is that the Phase II "double-blind, placebo controlled trial" for AZT was stopped before the planned 6 months duration, because the AZT group was doing so well. How could they know, if the study was blinded?

For me the most interesting part of this book is the description of the conflicting interests in medical “science”. I will ignore most of this here because it isn’t specific for AIDS.
What is very interesting in this context, because it resembles the AIDS hoax perfectly is the Subacute Myelo Optico-Neuropathy (SMON) epidemic that claimed thousands of Japanese victims in the 1950s and 1960s, because they were poisoned with the supposed medicine clioquinol.
In 1970 the neurology professor Tadao Tsubaki made the educated guess that SMON patients were dying because of clioquinol (instead of some virus). By July of 1970 he concluded: 96% of the SMON victims had taken clioquinol before the disease appeared and those with the most severe symptoms had taken the highest doses.
1971 saw only 36 cases, 3 in 1972, and 1 in 1973: http://www.primitivism.com/smon.htm

In a Dutch study they found that AIDS-victims couldn’t stay on the drugs because AZT is too toxic. It was a study of 97 AIDS-victims that were followed for a maximum of 147 weeks (median follow-up period 67 weeks); 70 of these victims died (72%).
Because of AZT the haemoglobin levels and leukocyte counts declined significantly. 56 patients (57%) needed one or more blood transfusions just to survive (the first blood transfusion took place at a median of 26 weeks).
97 of the 91 victims were started on full dose AZT. In the first year of poisoning 68% and in the second year 87% of the patients had at least 1 decrease of the dose (the median for the first dose reduction was 24 weeks). In 65 patients (67%) 103 times the poisoning had to be interrupted. In 33 victims (34%) anemia was the reason for the dose reduction.
At the same time of the first dose reduction, this had to be followed by interrupting the poisoning in 40 cases (71% of the victims with a dose reduction). Only 40% of the victims could stay on AZT for 24 week (without interruptions).
Van Leeuwen et al, Failure to maintain high-dose treatment regimens during long-term use of zidovudine … (1990): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...00048-0010.pdf
To this date the Physician's Desk Reference quotes the low toxicity of AZT reported by Broder et al in 1986, although the real toxicity of the drug is one thousand times higher according to more than 6 independent studies.

Duesberg describes only a few individual AIDS-victims. I repeat some of the atrocities about the adopted HIV-positive baby Lindsey that got poisoned with AIDS-medicine.
Before treatment: "She is [a] very bright, smiling and happy girl," noted the doctor. Lindsey was prescribed Septra, to be taken three times each week. Septra can cause "nausea, vomiting, anorexia," and "bone marrow depression," and also includes "rash, fever, [and] leukopenia" among its side effects.
A week later the doctor prescribed AZT (a chemotherapeutic drug designed to kill growing cells). Lindsey began swallowing a total of 120 milligrams of the drug every single day, in addition to her Septra. AZT kills dividing cells anywhere in the body-causing ulcerations and haemorrhaging; damage to hair follicles and skin; killing mitochondria, the energy cells of the brain; wasting away of muscles; and the destruction of the immune system and other blood cells.
The following month, the doctor strangely began praising Lindsey's "improvement." Upon reflection, the Nagels grew puzzled. What "improvement" could the doctor have meant, since Lindsey had suffered no medical problems at all before the treatment began? By the time Lindsey reached her first birthday on October 15, 1991, her adoptive parents began to lose patience. Becoming suspicious of their doctor for not admitting or discussing these “side effects”, Steve and Cheryl took Lindsey to Dr. Margaret Hostetter at the University of Minnesota clinic.
Hostetter immediately ended the Septra prescription, while increasing Lindsey's AZT dosage. At the Nagels' next visit she credited the baby girl's improvement to the AZT. In fact, she discussed plans to increase the AZT yet again. The doctor praised Lindsey's nonexistent progress at each visit. A few weeks later, the doctor had stretched the Nagels' patience by pressuring them to put Lindsey on ddI (a chemotherapy like AZT).
The tension finally erupted a few days after Lindsey's second birthday on October 15, 1992. Steve and Cheryl woke up one night to the tormented screams of their daughter. The muscle pains were unbearable. Leg massages, Tylenol-they used anything that would allow Lindsey to sleep again.
After the Nagels stopped poisoning Lindsey with AZT, she became a "new" child almost overnight. She started sleeping much better, including longer hours ... Her muscle cramps went away. She started eating at least 2-3 times as much every day as she had ever eaten before.
Dr. Hostetter verbally attacked the Nagels, as if they were 5 years old, "She also said that there are foster homes to provide care for children who were in Lindsey's predicament! (Living with parents who wouldn't give their daughter AZT)".
On October 15, 1995, Lindsey celebrated her fifth birthday-with HIV and without AZT -in excellent health. According to public health officials, she should already have died of AIDS because babies with HIV are supposed to survive only about two years.

Last edited by st jimmy; 24-11-2016 at 02:18 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-11-2016, 05:13 PM   #9
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Memorandum NSCM/46

On July 30th, 1977, the United States Code annotated Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 of the DoD was signed. This approves the testing of chemical weapons on human victims:
Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials”.

On March 17, 1978 a nice memorandum was signed by Secretary of State Zbigniew Brezinski “NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM-46”. This led to recommendations on the US policy towards Black Africa.
Memorandum-46 was (is) a plan to discredit “black” people in general.
Because the state propaganda invented that the cause of HIV was sexual promiscuity and sharing needles for injecting drugs, convincing us that black Africans were often HIV-positive was in reality (also) a strategy to discredit them: http://www.finalcall.com/memorandum-46.htm

2. Special clandestine operations should be launched by the CIA to generate mistrust and hostility in American and world opinion against joint activity of the two forces, and to cause division among Black African radical national groups and their leaders (...)
4. The FBI should mount surveillance operations against Black African representatives and collect sensitive information on those, especially at the U.N., who oppose U.S. policy toward South Africa. The information should include facts on their links with the leaders of the Black movement in the United States, thus making possible at least partial neutralization of the adverse effects of their activity (...)
(b) to elaborate and bring into effect a special program designed to perpetuate division in the Black movement and neutralize the most active groups of leftist radical organizations representing different social strata of the Black community: to encourage division in Black circles;
(c) to preserve the present climate which inhibits the emergence from within the Black leadership of a person capable of exerting nationwide appeal (...)
(e) to support actions designed to sharpen social stratification in the Black community which would lead to the widening and perpetuation of the gap between successful educated Blacks and the poor, giving rise to growing antagonism between different Black groups and a weakening of the movement as a whole (...)
(g) to take every possible means through the AFL-CIO leaders to counteract the increasing influence of Black labor organizations which function in all major unions and in particular, the National Coalition of Black Trade Union and its leadership including the creation of real preference for adverse and hostile reaction among White trade unionists to demands for improvement of social and economic welfare of the Blacks (...)
This would promote the achievement of a twofold purpose:
first, it would be easier to control the activity of loyal black representatives within existing institution;
second, the idea of an independent black political party now under discussion within black leadership circles would soon lose all support

The hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS is about as ridiculous as calling AIDS the cause of homosexuality, drug addiction, or… black skin.

Last edited by st jimmy; 26-11-2016 at 05:13 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2016, 03:44 PM   #10
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Robert E. Willner

Dr. Robert E. Willner was another AIDS-whistleblower. He published a book in 1994 “The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS”.
Here’s an interview with Willner about HIV/AIDS; he claims that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, AZT causes death and that “In New York and San Francisco only 7% of AIDS victims were HIV positive”: http://whale.to/c/conspiracy_nation.html

In 1993 Willner injected himself with HIV+ blood on the telescreen in Spain. He repeated this stunt several times.
On December 7, 1994 Willner injected himself with the blood of a HIV-positive victim to prove his point that HIV is harmless (see the picture). This video itself is pretty good - a group of some 30 people asking questions to Willner about AIDS: http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress4...himself-on-tv/

Willner also favoured alternative treatment for cancer; so they suspended his medical license in 1990. It shouldn’t surprise us that he died on April 15, 1995 of a “heart attack”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Willner
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-12-2016, 04:34 PM   #11
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos

Here’s a summary of 2 articles by AIDS-whistleblower Papadopulos-Eleopulos with important evidence that HIV isn’t the cause of AIDS.

Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al – “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HIV-T4-CELL-AIDS HYPOTHESIS” (1995): http://www.sidasante.com/themes/cd4/ept4cells.htm
In this paper Papadopulos-Eleopulos concludes that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS. To make reading a little easier first a translation for 2 of the “scientific” words: “HTLV- III” is another name for HIV. “T4 cells” are the T-cells that according to the official story are destroyed by HIV (T8-cells aren’t effected by HIV).
In 1985, Gallo and his colleagues (Gallo et al., 1985) showed that in mitogenically stimulated lymphocyte cultures from AIDS patients or in cultures from healthy donors "infected" with HIV, there is a decrease in the total number of viable cells. However:
(i) the decrease in viable cells begins before a significant increase in reverse transcriptase activity (RT), that is, HIV expression;
(ii) the rate of cell loss remains the same even when the expression of HIV (RT), is maximum (…)

According to Claude Ameisen and André Capron from the Pasteur Institute, not one of the mechanisms "proposed to account for these TH-cell defects
, including: (1) immune suppression, or its opposite, hyperactivation and exhaustion of the TH cells, (2) inhibitory signals mediated by HIV viral or regulatory gene products, (3) autoimmune responses, (4) selective infection and destruction of memory TH cells, (5) syncytia formation between infected and uninfected cells, and (6) inappropriate immune killing of uninfected cells", is satisfactory (…)

At present it is also known that:
(a) for the expression of HIV phenomena (RT, virus-like particles, antigen/antibody reactions), activation (mitogenic stimulation) is a necessary requirement (Klatzmann & Montagnier, 1986; Ameisen & Capron, 1991; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b);
(b) activation (stimulation) is induced by oxidation (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1982; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b);
Since both AIDS cultures and AIDS patients are exposed to mitogens (activating agents), all of which are oxidising agents (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988), both apoptosis and the phenomena upon which the presence of HIV is based (viral-like particles, RT, antigen/antibody reactions (WB), "HIV-PCR- hybridisation"), may all be the direct result of oxidative stress and therefore their specificity questionable (Papadopulos-Eleopulos, 1988; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992a; Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1992b).
As far back as January 1985 Montagnier wrote, "....replication and cytopathic effect of LAV can only be observed in activated T4 cells (…)

In considering the data from haemophiliacs, a group of British researchers, including the well known retrovirologist Robin Weiss, concluded in 1985: "We have thus been able to compare lymphocyte subset data before and after infection with HTLV- III. It is commonly assumed that the reduction in T-helper- cell numbers is a result of the HTLV-III virus being tropic for T-helper-cells. Our finding in this study that T-helper- cell numbers and the helper/suppressor ratio did not change after infection supports our previous conclusion that the abnormal T-lymphocyte subsets are a result of the intravenous infusion of factor VIII concentrates per se, not HTLV-III infection" (Ludlam et al., 1985) (…)

one must conclude that:
(a) the decrease in the T4 cell numbers and increase in T8 cell numbers in "HIV infected" cultures and individuals is due to agents other than HIV; HIV is neither necessary nor sufficient for the induction of the above phenomenon;
(b) in vivo the above changes may not be due to a selective destruction of T4 cells and increased proliferation of T8 cells, but loss of T4 surface markers and acquisition of T8 surface markers

The interview of Papadopulos-Eleopulos (EPE) by Johnson (CJ) from 1997 is even more extreme: http://www.theperthgroup.com/INTERVIEWS/cjepe.html
It comes to 4 conclusion that are bizarre if you’re a believer in the state propaganda on AIDS.
1 - HIV isn’t a virus at all.
Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of a few particles which they claimed are a retrovirus and are HIV. But photographs don’t prove particles are a virus and the existence of HIV was not proven using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.
Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding but for some unknown reason they did not publish any EMs of the material at 1.16 gm/ml which they and everyone afterwards call "pure HIV".
There are a few particles which the researchers claim are retroviral particles. In fact, they claim these are the HIV particles but give no evidence why. The band should contain billions and when you take an electron micrograph they should fill the entire picture. They bear only the vaguest resemblance to retroviral particles.
Let me repeat, there is no question of isolation. Gallo did not isolate a virus. There were no electron microscope pictures of a banded specimen that one would expect to show nothing but retroviral particles.

2 – HIV cannot be a retrovirus because it’s too large and doesn’t have knobs.
Retroviruses are incredibly tiny, almost spherical particles that have an outer envelope covered with knobs and an inner core consisting of some proteins and RNA.
All the AIDS experts agree that the knobs are absolutely essential for the HIV particle to lock on to a cell. As the first step in infecting that cell. So, no locking on, no infection. The experts all claim that the knobs contain a protein called gp120 which is the hook in the knobs that grabs hold of the surface of the cell it’s about to infect.(14) If HIV particles do not have knobs how is HIV able to replicate? And if it can't replicate, HIV is not an infectious particle.
Gallo and all other retrovirologists, as well as Hans Gelderblom who has done most of the electron microscopy studies of HIV, agree that retrovirus particles are almost spherical in shape, have a diameter of 100-120 nanometres and are covered with knobs.(12,13) The particles the two groups claim are HIV are not spherical, no diameter is less than 120nM, in fact many of them have major diameters exceeding twice that permitted for a retrovirus. And none of them appear to have knobs.

3 – The CDC uses a subjective definition for AIDS.
In fact, according to the CDC AIDS definition, you don’t even need to be HIV infected to be diagnosed as AIDS. That’s what I mean about being subjective. It’s like a physician seeing a patient with fever, diarrhoea, vomiting, weakness and shock and then declaring the cause is cholera. Sure it might be cholera but what about the dozens of other germs that cause a similar pattern?

4 – Haempohiliacs can’t be infected with HIV by donor blood.
CJ: I must confess I find it very hard to accept that haemophiliacs have not been infected through contaminated clotting concentrates. And I bet haemophiliacs do too.
EPE: Tell me this. If someone HIV positive is cut and bleeds how long does the blood remain infectious? Outside the body?
CJ: According to what I’ve read, for only a few hours at the most.
EPE: How is factor VIII made? All right I’ll tell you. It comes as a dry, flaky, yellowish powder and by the time it’s used it’s at least a couple of months old. Do you see the problem?
CJ: I do. If it’s dry and that old any HIV in it should be long dead.

I conclude - which isn’t mentioned in the interview with Papadopulos-Eleopulos - that there is not one shred of evidence that HIV-antbodies exist (HIV isn’t even a virus!).

Last edited by st jimmy; 18-12-2016 at 12:48 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-12-2016, 04:14 PM   #12
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)

Reading the paper and interview with Papadopulos-Eleopulos from the 1990s made me realise that I missed an important piece of evidence in this thread – the evidence of the state propaganda that HIV is the cause of AIDS.
According to the “independent” Wikipedia “On May 4, 1984, Gallo and his collaborators published a series of four papers in the scientific journal Science [14] demonstrating that a retrovirus they had isolated, called HTLV-III in the belief that the virus was related to the leukemia viruses of Gallo's earlier work, was the cause of AIDS.[15]”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gallo

This is what Papadopulos-Eleopulos had to say about this:
Although Gallo claims that in the four Science papers (Gallo et al., 1986) he and his colleagues "provided clearcut evidence that the aetiology of AIDS and ARC was the new lymphotropic retrovirus, HTLV-III", no such data were presented. (Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al., 1993b) (…)
To be fair, in his 1984 Science papers Gallo did not make such a direct claim. He said HIV was the probable cause of AIDS. But even this conclusion is questionable. Even if Gallo's evidence was incontrovertible proof he had isolated a retrovirus he only managed to isolate it from 26 out of 72 AIDS patients. That's only 36 percent. And only 88% of 49 AIDS patients had antibodies.
There was no evidence. But two years later, when Gallo was defending the accusation he had used the French virus to discover his version of HIV, he was much more definite about his 1984 papers. He said they provided "clearcut" evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS. And his opinion was no different in 1993.

Here are the 4 papers from May 4, 1984 of Gallo et al in Science: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...ype=pdf#page=4
The first 3 articles make no claim whatsoever that HIV is the cause of AIDS.
The 4th paper (page 18) “Antibodies Reactive with Human T-Lymphotropic Retroviruses (HTLV-III) in the Serum of Patients with AIDS” M. G. Sarngadharan, Mikulas Popovic, Lilian Bruch, Jörg Schüpbach, Robert C. Gallo is the interesting one and this is THE only (according to Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Duesberg and Nobel laureate Kary Mullis) paper used by the state media as “evidence” that HIV is the cause of AIDS.

Like Papadopulos-Eleopulos has written and said some 20 years ago, these papers do not even claim to be evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS. The only claim made is that there appears to be a relation between AIDS, homosexuality and HIV (that was named as HTLV-III). These are the most interesting quotes from this article:
Serum samples from 88 percent of patients with AIDS and from 79 percent of homosexual men with signs and symptoms that frequently precede AIDS, but from less than 1 percent of heterosexual subjects, have antibodies reactive against antigens of HTLV-III. (...)
These new isolates are designated HTLV-III and are described in the accompanyning reports (30-32). Here we describe the use of HTLV-III in an immunological screening of serum samples from patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS and from individuals at increased risk for AIDS. (...)
Serum samples were obtained from patients with clinically documented AIDS, Kaposi’s sarcoma, sexual contacts of AIDS patients, intravenous drug abusers, homosexual men, and heterosexual subjects. These sera were tested for their reactivity to HTLV-III by means of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (34). (...)
Because these 17 men had been seeking medical as¬sistance, they are not a representative sample of the homosexual population, and the high incidence of HTLV-III–specific antibodies in their sera may not reflect the true incidence in the homosexual population. (...)
Among the positive serum samples from AIDS patients there appears to be a wide variation in antibody titer to HTLV-III. Generally, the titers in sera from patients with advanced AIDS are significantly lower than those in sera from newly diagnosed pa¬tients and patients with pre-AIDS. This is consistent with the idea that HTLV-III infec¬tion causes an initial lymphoid proliferation but eventually causes death of the target lym¬phocytes (OKT4+) leading to the abnormal T4+/T8+ ratios and loss of helper T-cell functions including antibody production by B cells. (...)
In conclusion, we have shown a high incidence of specific antibodies to HTLV-III in patients with AIDS and pre-AIDS. Among the antibody-positive cases reported here a few are of particular importance with respect to the transmission of the disease.

Please read this report for yourself, I don’t see how anybody with half a brain can call this evidence that HTLV-III (HIV) is the cause of AIDS.

Last edited by st jimmy; 19-12-2016 at 04:15 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2017, 03:05 PM   #13
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Statistrics in Africa

I’ve found an interesting story about how the AIDS numbers were exaggerated in the 1990s using dirty tricks – Christian Fiala “AIDS in Africa: dirty tricks” (1998): http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/chrftricks.htm
Fiala focusses on the AIDS figures in Uganda and Tanzania to conclude that a heterosexually transmitted AIDS epidemic in Africa can only be regarded as cynical.

In October 1985 in Bangui, Niger the World Health Organisation (WHO) published a definition of AIDS that was exclusively applicable to developing countries. In this definition AIDS is determined - not by testing for HIV, but based on symptoms, like: diarrhoea for more than one month, 10% weight loss, and cough for one month. These symptoms weren’t rare in a country like Uganda with 20 years of systematic destruction behind it. Tuberculosis in Uganda could officially lead to an AIDS diagnosis.
Half of the beds in the internal ward of the Makerere University Clinic in Kampala were occupied by "AIDS patients". From 1986 on Uganda's AIDS figures increased sharply and Uganda was declared the "epicentre of AIDS".
In Tanzania another (narrower) definition was used to diagnose “AIDS”. Then, for reasons unknown, "AIDS cases" in Tanzania were reported that didn’t fulfil the definition; see the following excerpt from a report by the Tanzanian health ministry from August 1990:
"Of the 1,987 new cases registered, only 667 (33.6%) fulfilled the above mentioned criteria. Although 1,320 cases would not strictly qualify to be called AIDS cases, we have taken them as cases assuming that those who reported them just made an omission at the stage of compiling the forms".
In other words 2 third of the newly registered AIDS cases didn’t fulfil the definition for AIDS!

After the WHO definition had been in use for several years, the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Pan-American Health Organisation (PAHO) concluded that the WHO definition of AIDS "may not be adequate for clinical work" because of "the potential inapplicability of that definition". This means that AIDS could also be diagnosed based on other criteria.
Since then, developing countries can choose between the 3 definitions to diagnose AIDS. They can also diagnose AIDS based on the tighter definitions used in the developed world. In international statistics, however, all the AIDS cases are summarised together, although their numbers are based on different definitions thus not comparable.
It must be clear that when a disease is diagnosed based on symptoms that can be caused by (other) diseases - the number of AIDS cases doesn’t mean a thing.

The number of new AIDS cases in Uganda and Tanzania increased every year until 1991. Since then the numbers have been dropping.
All AIDS cases worldwide are registered by the WHO in Geneva. As there is an unknown number that isn’t registered, the WHO multiplies the registered cases to estimate the "actual" figure. This multiplication factor, increases year by year.
In 1996, the WHO multiplied registered AIDS cases in Africa by 12; in 1997 by 17. In the last one and a half years alone (written in 1998), 116,000 new cases of AIDS in Africa have been registered with the WHO. The WHO estimated the new cases in Africa by a whole 5.5 million, thus multiplying the reported cases by 47.
It is also bizarre that the AIDS figures are presented cumulatively. In this way not the number of new cases are seen by the gullible public, but only the total amount. In this way even a small amount of new AIDS cases (which could lead to a dangerous conclusion that the AIDS epidemic is over) leads to an increase in the number of AIDS cases.

Last edited by st jimmy; 28-01-2017 at 03:08 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2017, 01:46 PM   #14
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default AIDS vaccine

For some reason it’s impossible to find recent interesting information by whistleblowers on the AIDS/HIV fraud.

For more than 20 years the eugenics movement has been pushing for vaccination for AIDS – The global HIV vaccine pipeline.
They still haven’t been able to get an AIDS-vaccine accepted, but now that Donald Trump has become US president, all of those ridiculous regulations (to protect the population...) are expected to be thrown out of the window so we can have progress once more.

The following is from the “Pipeline Report global antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines” from July 2016. This also includes information on Tuberculosis.
In 2015 it was recommended to poison all HIV positive people with ART.
According to Polly Clayden, 40% of children on ART don’t get enough, and developing “new antiretroviral drugs and appropriate formulations for children continues to be far too slow”.

They want to harmonise (abolish?) regulations to speed up approval for new ART poisons and HIV vaccines.
They want to expand free condoms and lubricant, counselling, and access to AIDS testing and treatment.
“Education” should promote and facilitate participation in clinical trials.
Manipulation of research to make “evidence that interventions could benefit immunologic non-responders (INRs) even if they fail the cure research context”.

I read in this report:
Currently ongoing and planned cure-related clinical trials are not expected to lead directly to a cure, but rather to define pathways which when further developed and possibly combined may lead to sterilizing or functional cure
I read here that sterilisation of the population is an objective of AIDS-treatment: http://www.pipelinereport.org/2016/executive-summary (archived here: http://archive.is/YeF4C)

The following report by the International Aids Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), is also relevant, because it proves that the focus in HIV-vaccination is on women.
If my conclusion is correct that the objective of HIV-vaccination is depopulation by sterilisation, the focus would obviously be on young women and girls...

The IAVI has performed a 2 year, $210 million pilot program launched by: US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Nike Foundation.
This program focuses on “hot spots” in 10 countries where HIV incidence is highest among girls and young women.

They specifically focus on the girls and young women in east and south Africa, because these are supposedly infected at rates 2 to 5 times higher than boys and men their age, with the non-existent HIV virus.
82% of all adolescents (ages 10-19) with HIV reside in Africa.
Globally, half of adults infected with HIV are women. In Africa women represent 60% of HIV positive victims.
Adolescent girls, should be vaccinated as pre-adolescents before the onset of sexual activity (before they can produce more unwanted children...).
The UNAIDS-Lancet Commission calls for efforts to expand access to HIV/AIDS treatment particularly among women and girls, including development of an AIDS vaccine.

The number of new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths is declining globally: http://www.iavi.org/what-we-do/advoc...n-aids-vaccine

According to the state media, in Africa women represent 60% of people living with HIV.
In the Netherlands the official numbers of confirmed HIV positive victims is: 11,616 gay men; 3659 straight men; 3591 women. That’s only 19% women…
This is a total of 18,866 HIV-victims on a Dutch population of 17 million; a little more than 0.1%.
According to the state propaganda another 2800 HIV positive patients are estimated in the Netherlands that have not yet been discovered.

Here are the numbers worldwide: https://www.aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics...al-statistics/
At the end of 2015, there is an estimated 36.7 million people worldwide living with HIV/AIDS. Only 60% of HIV victims have already been sentenced to AIDS (the remaining 40%, or over 14 million, have simply been added for political reasons).

The majority of HIV victims are in low- and middle-income countries. Especially in sub-Saharan Africa, with an estimated 25.6 million HIV victims in 2015- that’s 70% of the total.
According to these statistrics only the following causes for AIDS are possible: malnutrition, pesticides or chemical weapons.

An estimated 35 million people have died from AIDS (since the beginning of the 1980s), including 1.1 million in 2015…
Since June 2016, 18.2 million HIV victims are poisoned with antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the world, up from 15.8 million in June 2015, 7.5 million in 2010, and less than one million in 2000.

There is no evidence for an AIDS “epidemic”?
In none of these official reports on the AIDS “epidemic”; multivitamins, with a proven efficacy, are mentioned...

Last edited by st jimmy; 11-09-2017 at 01:48 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2017, 05:16 PM   #15
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Drugs, Chemotherapy, Malnutrition (2003)

I’ve found a good article; Duesberg, Koehnlein and Rasnick – The chemical bases of the various AIDS epidemics: recreational drugs, anti-viral chemotherapy and malnutrition (2003): http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=ht...drchemical.pdf

The big advantage of this paper, compared to Duesberg’s book already posted in this thread, is that it’s much shorter (“only” 30 pages)…
My biggest criticism on this paper is that it offers nothing new since his 1996 book. Another criticism on this paper is that the other AIDS-toxics (besides AZT) to “treat” AIDS-victims, aren’t paid enough attention to. This is also a flaw in this thread.
Below are some excerpts from the paper, which show that:
1) AIDS isn’t caused by any virus;
2) In Africa there is a correlation between malnutrition and AIDS;
3) There is a correlation between “recreational” drugs use and AIDS.
Please note that I’m not convinced that “recreational” drugs cause AIDS. Maybe drugs users can be more easily poisoned with chemical and biological weapons...

However, the plethora of AIDS diseases was not, and still is not randomly distributed even among the different risk groups (table 2). For example, Kaposi’s sarcoma was exclusively diagnosed in male homosexual risk groups using nitrite inhalants and other psychoactive drugs as aphrodisiacs (Newell et al 1984; Haverkos et al 1985; Selik et al 1987; Duesberg 1988; Haverkos and Dougherty 1988; Beral et al 1990). Bacterial pneumonia was primarily diagnosed in children from mothers using psychoactive drugs during pregnancy (Novick and Rubinstein 1987; Duesberg 1988, 1992; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1997). Tuberculosis and pneumonia were, and still are more prevalent in intravenous drug users and “crack” (cocaine) smokers than in other risk groups (Lerner 1989; Duesberg 1992; Duesberg and Rasnick 1998).
In sharp contrast to its US/European namesakes, the African AIDS epidemic is randomly distributed between the sexes and not restricted to behavioural risk groups (Blattner et al 1988; Duesberg 1988; World Health Organization 2001a). Hence sub-Saharan African AIDS is compatible with a random, either microbial or chemical cause.
But, only 1 in 1000 unprotected sexual contacts transmits HIV (32–34) , and only 1 of 275 US citizens is HIV-infected (29, 30), (figure 1b). Therefore, an average un-infected US citizen needs 275,000 random “sexual contacts” to get infected and spread HIV – an unlikely basis for an epidemic!
But, in the peer-reviewed literature there is not one doctor or nurse who has ever contracted AIDS (not just HIV) from the over 816,000 AIDS patients recorded in the US in 22 years (30). Not one of over ten thousand HIV researchers has contracted AIDS. Wives of hemophiliacs do not get AIDS (35). And there is no AIDS-epidemic in prostitutes (36–38). Thus AIDS is not contagious (39, 40).
According to the article “the state’s top AIDS and HIV prevention officials came up with the smoking gun of all statistics: Gay men in California who use speed are twice as likely to be HIV-positive . . .” (Heredia 2003a).
The case for malnutrition and lack of drinkable water as the common denominator and probable cause of African AIDS in the HIV-era has been made by scientific (Mims and White 1984; Seligmann et al 1984; Konotey-Ahulu 1987a, b, 1989; Fiala 1998; Oliver 2000; Stewart et al 2000; Ross 2003) and non-scientific observers (Hodgkinson 1996; Shenton 1998; Malan 2001). The non-scientific observers even include the United Nations (Namango and World Food Program of the United Nations 2001) and president Mbeki of South Africa (Cherry 2000; Gellman 2000).
For example, the Lancet published in 1993 a Canadian epidemiological study, “HIV and the etiology of AIDS”, which found that 88% of AIDS cases in a cohort of male homosexuals at risk for AIDS had used nitrite inhalants and that 75–80% of the same cohort had also used “cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, lysergic acid dimethyl amide, or methylenedioxy amphetamine” (Schechter et al 1993). One of the subjects even passed away on an “overdose” of recreational drugs during the study. In addition an undisclosed percentage (but in 1993 certainly a high percentage, see above) was also prescribed the DNA chain-terminator AZT as anti-HIV drug (Duesberg 1993a, c). Thus not a single drug-free AIDS patient was identified. But, the study concluded, “drugs and sexual activity is rejected by these data” as causes of AIDS. Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged that their study “does not rule out a role for cofactors . . .”.
A sudden 10-fold increase in the mortality of HIV-positive British hemophiliacs, right after the introduction of AZT in 1987, made scientific headlines in 1995, because the increased mortality was attributed to HIV by the authors of the study, i.e. Darby et al (1995), as well as by the editor of Nature, “More conviction on HIV and AIDS” (Maddox 1995). Even the editor of the Lancet wrote an editorial asking, “Will Duesberg now concede defeat” (Horton 1995)? Darby et al based their conclusion on the sudden 10-fold increase of the hemophiliacs’ mortality in 1987, shown in figure 5, on the facts that the increased mortality was restricted to HIVpositive hemophiliacs and that the increase was independent of the degree of hemophilia (which is inversely proportional to the life expectancy of the patient).
Moreover, the mortality of hemophiliacs was steadily decreasing since the 1970s until 1987 – despite the presence of HIV (Duesberg 1995c)! Thus the only new risk of mortality, in and after 1987, was not HIV, but AZT. Darby et al even acknowledged “treatment, by prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia or with zidovudine (AZT), has been widespread for HIV-infected haemophiliacs since about 1989 (more accurately since 1987)”. The editor of Nature also pointed out that, “Darby et al failed to provide full details of the drug regimen followed” (Maddox 1995). The AZT-mortality hypothesis would of course also explain why the new hemophilia mortality was independent of the severity of the hemophilia, as Darby et al observed.

Last edited by st jimmy; 30-10-2017 at 05:16 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2017, 02:10 PM   #16
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)

Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
This post is not a full summary of the 724 pages (37MB to download) of the book “Inventing The AIDS Virus” (1996) by Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison:
No surprises here; the PDF was disabled when I tried it today; here's an active link to “Inventing The AIDS Virus” (1996): http://www.whale.to/c/Inventing-the-...irus%20(1).pdf
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2017, 04:56 PM   #17
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)
Default Smallpox vaccination

I haven’t really tried to describe what the cause of AIDS is in this thread...
I have found a 11 May 1987 article in the London Times, that shows that smallpox vaccination by the WHO could have been used to cause AIDS.

The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is studying new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defence virus infection (HIV).

Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.

But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times: 'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.' 'In obliterating one disease, another was transformed.'

Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed services are immunized as a precaution against possible biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.

This discovery of how people with subclinical HIV infection are at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox vaccination.

Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had been involved in any homosexual activity.

In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing countries.

The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of each of the seven Central African states which top the league table of most-affected countries; why Brazil became the most afflicted Latin American country; and how Haiti became the route for the spread of Aids to the US. It also provides an explanation of how the infection was spread more evenly between males and females in Africa than in the West and why there is less sign of infection among five to 11-year-olds in Central Africa.

Although no detailed figures are available, WHO information indicated that the Aids league table of Central Africa matches the concentration of vaccinations. The greatest spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes, with the number of people immunised being as follows: Zaire 36,878,000; Zambia 19,060,000; Tanzania 14,972,000; Uganda 11,616,000; Malawai 8,118,000; Ruanda 3,382,000 and Burundi 3,274,000.

Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region.
About 14,000 Haitians, on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a popular playground for San Francisco homosexuals.
(archived here: http://archive.is/UWPdR)

I’ve searched for the Robert Redfield “scientific” report that was referred to in the article, but couldn’t find a freely viewable version – Redfield et al – Disseminated Vaccinia in a Military Recruit with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Disease (1987): http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...98703123161106

Last edited by st jimmy; 11-12-2017 at 04:57 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2018, 04:56 PM   #18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 226
Likes: 49 (44 Posts)

I could not download your pdf. Is there a way to have it in another format?
better21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2018, 10:09 AM   #19
st jimmy
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 1,501 (900 Posts)

I was trying to find information on how AIDS-whistleblowers’ lives have been destroyed, but couldn’t find much…
Here’s a list of AIDS-whistleblowers that faced some problems. I will not describe what their different stances are on the cause of AIDS.

The most interesting story is about Professor Peter H. Duesberg.
In 1991, a government-appointed panel of scientists, decided not to renew Duesberg’s research grants. Before raising questions about the role of HIV in AIDS causation, Duesberg’s grant applications were never denied. Duesberg remains cut off from all NIH funding, and commutes to Germany to conduct his scientific work.

Dr. Kuritzkes demanded that denialists like Peter Duesberg be denied access to students and reported to authorities. WSJ reporter Marilyn Chase warned reporters not to unintentionally "exalt the position of denialists by making them seem like just some sort of independent intellectual contrarian whose views really should be heeded”.
On 13 May 2008, Semmelweis Society International (SSI) presented the Semmelweis "Clean Hands" Award to Professor Peter Duesberg and Investigative Journalist Celia Farber. Farber had interviewed Duesberg first in 1988: http://aidswiki.net/index.php?title=...views_Duesberg

The NIH barred Farber from further contact with their scientists and labelled her a "threat to public health". In May 2008, Richard Jefferys - of the “independent” AIDS Activist group TAG - led the campaign to antagonise the SSI over the Farber/Duesberg awards. Clark Barker was hired by the SSI to investigate if Duesberg and Farber deserved the award. Immediately some former SSI-members told Barker that Duesberg and Farber are liars and responsible for millions of deaths by AIDS in Africa and insisted that he would stop the investigation. When Barker wouldn’t listen; on June 19th they initiated a "spam attack" against him: http://robertscottbell.blogspot.nl/2...allos-egg.html

Bryan J. Ellison in 1994 described how the careers of 5 whistleblowers (including Duesberg) on AIDS were destroyed.

William R. Holub - After publishing an article in 1988 about AIDS, was blacklisted from work in both industrial biotechnology and academia. He lost his home, was forced into bankruptcy, and now supports his wife and children with a job handling toxic chemicals, supplemented by delivering newspapers.

Philip Artz Kees - Charges were brought against him in 1985 before the California Medical Board after he testified about the promiscuous administration of psychotropic drugs like haldol, prolixine and thorazine at Patton State Hospital. His medical license was suspended (revoked in 1992) throughout his 7 years of hearings, which led to bankruptcy.

Edward J. Wawszkiewicz – After publishing questions about the established AIDS thinking, was suddenly labelled "mentally ill" by the University in 1986, forced to stop teaching and with no salary and is now (1994) struggling to stay alive on food stamps.

Nathaniel S. Lehrman – Was critical of the official AIDS story since 1985. He was set up by his colleague, was persecuted for Medicaid fraud that this colleague had committed, lost his medical license. He was convicted in 1991 to 1-3 years in prison, $250,000 in "restitution" and a fine of $100,000 by a Health Department administrative judge: : http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/newsletters/1994-01.pdf

Dr. Etienne de Harven was censored in France for trying to expose the AIDS fraud: https://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/07/2...-hiv-and-aids/

Johan Van Dongen from the Netherlands discovered that Aids and Ebola were manmade. He lost his job at the University of Maastricht and his house: https://joelsavage1.wordpress.com/20...edical-crimes/
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2018, 10:45 AM   #20
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pandæmonium
Posts: 25,965
Likes: 5,575 (3,762 Posts)

Thanks for the info jimmy.
So in a jist, anything unknown but immune deficiency could be all put in a bag called AIDS and the origin of immune deficiency may not derive from HIV virus but it could simply be a candida mass infection etc.

Recently I've found out that even lack of one or two hormones can cause weaking of immune sysmtem. e.g. women going through menopause, lack of female hormones changes the gut flora hence diahrea or soft poo Also thinning of wall, caused by reduced hormones, between female organ and gut proximity meant that another hormones that was produced to flush out the menstral blood leaks into the gut hence diahrea/soft poo scenario. This is just one example. So really you can see, there is lot more than AIDS and it's not good that they are putting in AIDS bag.

Anyway, whatever virus they put in the vaccines could stay dormant for years till you reach an old age. And when the immune system weakens, whatever was dormant could suddenly break out...hence dementia etc.

Last edited by elshaper; 28-05-2018 at 10:50 AM.
Likes: (1)
elshaper is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.