Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15-07-2009, 09:20 PM   #1
kittan22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default "Baby due vaccinations soon, help needed pls"

hi anyone could help i dont know what to do for the best i have a little girl who is 8week she is due for her vaccinations her
( Tet 1, Pol 1, Hib 1, Dip 1, Pneu 1)

should i let her have them is it really safe for her to have them,

and also how do i know if they vaccinate my girl with swine flu

what should i do ?
kittan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2009, 09:33 PM   #2
biblegirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 6,462
Likes: 5 (4 Posts)
Default helpful interview from former pharma employee

Hello, I am copying a post I made on another thread http://davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=66334 for questions on the MMR, which IMO applies to any vaccines:

This subject is one of my specialties. The following show my personal conclusions after 5 years of research into this subject:

The MMR will not prevent measles mumps and rubella. I am one of the people who contracted Mumps FROM THE MMR vaccination, and imo one is more likely to get the sickenesses from getting the jabs than anything else, as was evidenced by the polio vaccine fiasco.

If your daughter gets measles at a later time, she will build up a natural immunity to it. A vaccine would only be a step backwards after that point.

IMO you can maintain your daughter's good health with nutrition and healthy living, but if you are concerned about prevention you can look into homeopathic remedies which are 100% safe with 0 side effects and are effective at preventing/treating illness. IMO it is "okay to have nothing" but I encourage looking into it yourself so you can be confident with your decision, it is not hard at all to find the atrocities caused by vaccines on the internet...

You are correct in that vaccines have never been proven to be effective. In fact you cannot find one conclusive study anywhere on any vaccine on effectiveness.

IMO ALL vaccines are detrimental to health, not just the MMR as they contain the same toxic substances as fillers, for example: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, MSG, etc.

From personal experience, IMO the unvaccinated children seem to fare much better healthwise than vaccinated children, who seem to be plagued by ear infections and the like. Healthy diet is a great way to maintain health, the vaccine scam kinda scares us into thinking we will get a load of diseases without the jab, but the evidence just isn't there to support this.

I should ask you, is the only reason you're going to the doctor tomorrow because of these jabs? If so, you can consider cancelling your appointment. The #1 vaccine refusal excuse you can use is: "she has had adverse reactions to vaccines in the past and we don't want to put our daughter through that again..." this is a hard one for them to counter since it puts them in more liability, or you can use the "adverse reactions run in the family" reason...

If they still use their scare tactics after that, ASK TO SEE AN INGREDIENT LIST so that you can determine exactly which ingredients you don't want your children to have. They are RELUCTANT to show anyone this, or may say they can't find it, but if they actually show you one you can point out on their own paper that you don't want your daughter receiving those toxic substances. They may go so far as to have you sign a paper, affectionately referred to as the "bad parent paper" where you agree that you are putting your child in harm's way, blah blah blah for not consenting to the vaccine...

Here is a great interview with former vaccine developer that may help to answer your questions:

Quote:


http://www.vaclib.org/basic/manu.htm
Quote:
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:53:15 -0800
Dear Members and Friends -

Great interview of a former pharma employee who is now retired...speaking out after realizing the ramifications of FORCED vaccination. Wish a few more would speak up instead of seeing their security in a retirement check as this guy apparently does....

Ingri

JON RAPPOPORT
http://www.nomorefakenews.com/
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba. Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

Q: How were your findings received?

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

Q: And that happens?

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

Q: What was the turning point for you?

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Q: Did you investigate?

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

Q: What do you mean?

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: And that is what you found?

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time. Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

Q: Has it been enough?

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

Q: Which is?

A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

A: Yes I did.

Q: What happened?

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself. I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: This network you speak of.

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.

Q: A good idea.

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

Q: The things that are not there.

A: Yes.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe. In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings. They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win. __________________________________________________ _______________

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."
for questions on any vaccine side effects/studies etc. visit http://vaclib.org/keywords.htm
biblegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2009, 09:50 PM   #3
lauren_almighty
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

i don't have children but if it was me having to make this decision i would not let my baby have any vaccinations. i have read various articles on mmr jabs and the link with autism. my brother is under the autistic spectrum and i blame the vaccinations.
i have hardly had any vaccinations in my whole life... i haven't even had the tb jab that everybody gets in high school. from a young age i always had a strong immune system. i don't even take aspirin for a headache. i believe that the body will fight off any illnesses by itself.
lauren_almighty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2009, 11:25 PM   #4
paolo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 17 (5 Posts)
Default

Simple. Don't do 'em
None of them.
I've raised six kids. The only two with health problems got first vaccinations, nothing like today
Just say no
No vaccinations, not standard, not swine flu, not nothing.
I've got 4 entirely healthy kids not vaccinated, two who have long-standing problems dating from their vaccinations
No no no
paolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 12:03 PM   #5
myeika
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Smile This might help you decide!

Hiya Kittan,

Take a look at this, it might help?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...9&hl=undefined
__________________
In Love and Service
Myeika
****************************************
"Actions are destiny's pen. The line of actions drawn today becomes tomorrow's destiny, so be sure that you are drawing a work of art"
****************************************
myeika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 02:43 PM   #6
wellwoman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South East
Posts: 120
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Hi,

I had my baby vaccinated at 8 weeks all because I trusted my Dr and wanted to do the best for my baby

Then 45mins after the jabs, my gorgeous little boy was screaming in pain and kicking his legs (never had colic btw). I rushed him back to the Drs and demanded they tell me what is causing my baby to scream in pain like this-no one would answer me, all they said was its normal, give him calpol he will be fine. Ok, they were right on that he seemed 'ok' after an hour or so of screaming but I still had no idea why my baby had been in pain when I was told worst would happen he would get a fever,.

As you can imagine this totally freaked me out and scared the hell out of me, I then decided to look up on vaccinations...

Never ever again. Please do what your gut instinct is telling you. When your baby is sitting on your lap ready to be pierced, your instinct tells you...this is wrong.

I tell everyone I know to look this up and not to just trust midwife/drs. My friend sadly did not listen- said "oh no, im not risking my baby getting ill he will have all his jabs" Just 3 days after having first lot, he is a completely different baby, cries alot and wont settle, when before he was fine!

I make sure my kids get all they need through good old fruit and veg!

I feel so ashamed that I didnt research before and just took my drs word for it I was so careful during my pregnancy to eat all the right things and while I was breastfeeding-to then just dose him up with big shot of poison!

A big well done for doing what I did'nt do-research before!
wellwoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 04:18 PM   #7
alzee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biblegirl View Post
Hello, I am copying a post I made on another thread http://davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=66334 for questions on the MMR, which IMO applies to any vaccines:

.........................

for questions on any vaccine side effects/studies etc. visit http://vaclib.org/keywords.htm
Some great info there, thanks. The interview has already been particularly useful and has been posted on another forum
alzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 04:51 PM   #8
antinwo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 221B Baker Street
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Don't do it. My four children are not vaccinated and are the healthiest children around. I know, however, many vaccine damaged children so it isn't worth taking the risk IMO. Let your babies immune system do what it was designed to do.
antinwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 04:57 PM   #9
rubes
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 89
Likes: 2 (1 Post)
Default

Our little un is now just over 1, she had the initial DTP vaccines, if i was more clued up just 12 months ago i would NOT have had them, we have had 3 or 4 reminders for her booster, but we have just ignored them, if we get a phonecall i will just tell them my beliefs, if they dont like it tuff, they WILL be told

As for the MMR, we will NOT be having this done either

For any future fraggles that come along, they will not be having any vaccines at all

We bought some dvd's from dave Starbuck and have a good book on vaccines, if i can copy the dvd's on my laptop, which i beleive is perfectly legal as the dvd's state to copy and spread the word, then i will post out for anyone who wants one
rubes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 05:16 PM   #10
myeika
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubes View Post
We bought some dvd's from dave Starbuck and have a good book on vaccines, if i can copy the dvd's on my laptop, which i beleive is perfectly legal as the dvd's state to copy and spread the word, then i will post out for anyone who wants one
Thats a cool idea, let me know if you do please, they would be a big help.
Thanks for this

love and hugs
__________________
In Love and Service
Myeika
****************************************
"Actions are destiny's pen. The line of actions drawn today becomes tomorrow's destiny, so be sure that you are drawing a work of art"
****************************************
myeika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 05:26 PM   #11
timelord
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 716
Likes: 24 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kittan22 View Post
hi anyone could help i dont know what to do for the best i have a little girl who is 8week she is due for her vaccinations her
( Tet 1, Pol 1, Hib 1, Dip 1, Pneu 1)

should i let her have them is it really safe for her to have them,

and also how do i know if they vaccinate my girl with swine flu

what should i do ?
Just say no. Thats what we did - our consultant paediatrician (my son has severe special needs) has shown no objection to it, although a community paediatrician did, we just told her to take a hike.

Last edited by timelord; 16-07-2009 at 05:28 PM.
timelord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 08:55 PM   #12
lookfar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 19,178
Likes: 6 (6 Posts)
Default

Hi kittan22 & welcome to the forum

I can totally understand your concern and know what pressures you must be getting put under by the so-called health professionals and other mums even. They are only reacting that way because they believe the hype they've been told and think they're doing the best thing for their kids by having them jabbed (I know as I used to be one of them, lol!).

However, from what I know now I would personally not have my child vaccinated and would stand my ground and argue the point with them about it, providing as much back up information as possible.

Unfortunately in my sons case, I wasn't aware of the information at the time of his vaccines so at the mo he is fully up-to-date, however, I'm sure he will be due some soon but he will not be getting them that's for sure!

It's your decision, whatever you decide to do, so I wish you all the very best. Above all else, stay positive and don't let it worry you. Love to you both x
__________________
“It's just a ride and we can change it any time we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings of money, a choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your door, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love instead see all of us as one.” BILL HICKS
http://www.markthomasinfo.com/ http://www.waykiwayki.com/
Dolphins playing in bubble rings
lookfar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2009, 11:02 PM   #13
janedoe
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Down the RabbitHole somewhere
Posts: 271
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Hello. My daughter is 8 and due to my lifestyle (international move for one) I have luckily escaped it thus far. My partner is very informed on the subject and the law (not a lawyer!! Freeman) and our rights. I understand that your fear is that they will perhaps pressure and or label you unfit. By your very inquiry you are fit. My advice is what was given me really. Simply be matter of fact, kind and agree to the vaccination IF AND ONLY IF, the person performing the procedure agrees to sign a legal and binding contract accepting all liability if any harm comes to the child in any way (even a fucking fever why not?), They are public servants, remember that, WHERE AS YOU ARE SOVEREIGN). Easy peasy. Gd luck. And congratulations on your new baby! Bless your family

Last edited by janedoe; 16-07-2009 at 11:07 PM. Reason: spelling
janedoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2009, 01:43 AM   #14
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janedoe
Simply be matter of fact, kind and agree to the vaccination IF AND ONLY IF, the person performing the procedure agrees to sign a legal and binding contract accepting all liability if any harm comes to the child in any way
Excellent idea!!

95% of them will not sign such a waiver!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2009, 06:53 AM   #15
pri01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 92 (50 Posts)
Default

My daughter has just had her first baby. I desperately want to try and influence her thinking process around the dangers of vaccines. However, I feel that because it is not my baby I should really leave her to make her own mind up. If I knew when she was a baby what I know now, I would never have had my kids vaccinated. So, I'm wondering that if I do try to influence her would she thank me for it?
pri01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2009, 08:55 PM   #16
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

You can email her some threads from this site and other info and just pray she does the right thing
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2012, 09:10 AM   #17
a_skywatcher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Hello everyone.

I've been reading this site for ages now, but only recently joined it. The reason I did join was to reply to people who are wondering what to do about vaccinating their babies and children.

My main soapboxes are vaccines and chemtrails. I am vehemently opposed to both these things, but vaccines are something that a parent has an informed choice about at least.

In a word Kittan, if I were in your position, I'd say a definate NO.

A baby's immune system is under-developed at 2 months and doesn't fully kick in until about 1 year. If you give a child a vaccine of any kind, this undermines that immune system by each shot given. ALL children's shots contain mercury. This is a poison and radically kills off brain cells. Vaccines also contain a plethora of other toxins and nasties that are of no use to a child that age.

In my opinion, for what it's worth, vaccines are unneccessary. If your child is fed a balanced diet as he/she grows and eats plenty of vitamin enriched foods, then this is all that's needed for any child to fight off childhood illnesses.

Always remember, even though some children are vaccinated against XYZ, they can still catch the disease anyway, but when they do, because their immune system is compromised by the vaccine, the same child will suffer more because the immune system cannot handle it as well as those who had not been previously vaccinated.

I am so insensed by the way all medical staff push vaccines onto people and make them feel like they are somehow doing wrong by not 'protecting' their child if they don't, that I made a blog just about that and the dangers of vaccines themselves and the harm they do.

Have a look...

http://vaccinesdonotwork.blogspot.com/

BTW, I'm not here to promote my own blog, I just want others to make an imformed decison before making that choice of whether to vaccinate or not.
a_skywatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2012, 03:40 PM   #18
biblegirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 6,462
Likes: 5 (4 Posts)
Default

Good stuff skywatcher, welcome to the forum
biblegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2012, 04:22 PM   #19
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

An excellent reply skywatcher,thank you!!!

Welcome to the site
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2012, 06:46 AM   #20
a_skywatcher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Smile

Thanks guys, just hope it saves some poor mites.
a_skywatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.