Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-01-2018, 03:07 PM   #121
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing - Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology
Date:
Wednesday, November 8, 2017 - 10:00am
Location:
2318 Rayburn House Office Building
Subcommittees:

Subcommittee on Energy (115th Congress)
Subcommittee on Environment (115th Congress)



Hearing charter

Opening Statements:

?Full Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas)

Environment Subcommittee Chairman Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)

Energy Subcommittee Chairman Randy Weber (R-Texas)

Witnesses:

Dr. Phil Rasch, chief scientist for climate science, Laboratory Fellow, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [Truth in Testimony]
Dr. Joseph Majkut, director of climate policy, Niskanen Center [Truth in Testimony]
Dr. Douglas MacMartin, senior research associate, Cornell University [Truth in Testimony]
Ms. Kelly Wanser, principal director, Marine Cloud Brightening Project, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington [Truth in Testimony]

115th Congress
https://science.house.gov/legislatio...geoengineering
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 04:42 PM   #122
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Busting Open the Chemtrail Denial Subterfuge
JULIAN ROSE
9 hours ago

As we swing into the New Year, many are going to be feeling more than a little impatient that the perpetrators of the toxic air-born emissions which create engineered clouds over vast areas of our skies, still remain largely anonymous.

Anonymous by name, but no doubt to be found within the ranks of military industrial proponents and psychopathic secret society hegemons: those who hide behind the 1991 Hughes Aircraft atmospheric aerosol patent. The patent that formalized an engineering technique which alters the climate and sickens the planetary population with its debilitating fall-out.

There is a red line test that almost instantly reveals people's awareness about these, and related, military activities. Just put the question “What do you think about 9/11? And how do you feel about chemtrails?” You might be surprised to find that those who you consider reasonably intelligent and quite thoughtful individuals, appear to be neither when asked to think about these two actualities.

This response to the first question would be quite typical “It's obvious, 9/11 was an al-Qaeda mission led by bin Laden. There's nothing suspicious about it.” And on chemtrails “They don't exist”.

What one runs into when confronted with such an unquestioning response, creates a genuine human dilemma. Where can one turn if fellow human beings are unwilling to examine, in any detail, incriminating evidence that stands behind such crime's against humanity?

However, things take on a vastly magnified significance once one seeks to solicit the truth from those well placed to actually know something about what goes on in the higher echelons of military defense planning, or amongst those concerned with environmental protection, weather forecasting and civil aviation. The silence in these quarters is deafening.

Atmospheric aerosol geoengineering (chemtrails) is one of the most crudely in-your-face debasements of civil justice and environmental and human health, ever to have been enacted upon mankind – outside of outright war.

Even if one thought it might be happening as some form of defense against 'global warming', one could hardly fail to realize that nobody ever asked if you, or anyone else for that matter, were in agreement for such an experiment to be undertaken in the sky above your home, and from one end to the other of your country of residence.

The mind tries to grasp how it could be that the smothering of our skies with toxic engineered clouds, a process that has been going on for at least two decades, could fail to elicit any response from the majority of mortals living on planet Earth. Yet most claim 'not to have noticed' these activities, and others have told me “I never look up”.

What an indictment concerning the state of imprisonment that great swathes of humanity try to make their peace with.

So what do we actually know about the manufacture of these aerosols? Who is behind them – and how are they dispersed in the atmosphere?

In short, we know that in 1975 the US navy was granted a patent which describes the dispersion method for a 'powdered contrail' able to sustain itself in the atmosphere for long periods. And in 1990 the US Department of Defense used the word 'chemtrails' as the title of a chemistry manual for pilots attending the US Air Force Academy. A manual that teaches how to make these aerosols. This is verifiable information in the public domain - so that does away with the 'conspiracy theory' factor straight away.

We know, from public records, that airborne chemical spraying – in one form or another – has been going on for at least sixty years. Early examples include cloud seeding during World War Two and in Vietnam during the US invasion of the late 1960's.

Atmospheric geoengineering has come about and continues to operate, as a military project. In the 1980's it became known as an 'Environmental Modification Weapon' (En Mod), and due to the widespread controversy this aroused, such techniques were banned under the auspices of UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, 1987.

However this UN edict is not enshrined in law, and it is quite clear that whoever is behind the atmospheric weaponry, is not unduly phased, and continues to order the mining and smelting of vast tonnages of aluminium as well as other components such as barium and titanium; to be processed into a substance which is then spread around the world via aircraft flying at around twenty five to thirty thousand feet.

If anyone 'official' has anything to say at all about this activity, it is that “there is some discussion about using geoengineering techniques to counter the affects of sunlight as a cause of global warming.” We know that British and US governments have, since 2009, been 'discussing' the use of geoengineering to combat climate change via the spreading aerosols in the atmosphere.

In recent years more and more independent research projects, both in Europe and the USA, have revealed the presence of aluminium, barium and titanium in water courses far from any likely factory processing zones. In Germany and Switzerland recent research has revealed alarmingly high levels detected at many sites; and in France nanotech chemtrail 'filaments' have recently been recorded at locations all over the country.

Most of what I have described up until now is not new knowledge, but needs repeating so as to remind us of the extent to which the chemtrails phenominum has become a ubiquitous feature of modern life.

But why, given this fact, haven't we nailed the perpetrators years ago? How could something so deadly be practiced on a global scale and yet manage to remain almost completely unidentified at source?

For example, how many millions of tons of alluminium are used in the course of a year's spraying?
Where does it come from? Who organizes the shipments – the processing and the delivery to airports? How come governments remain totally silent?

The answer to these questions – that are out there – remain sketchy. Maybe because just a handful of dedicated self resourced activist researchers have, up until now, led the way in identifying just about all we know about these activities. That needs to change. Many more need to be involved and the exposure needs to be ramped up ten fold.

There is still some controversy concerning exactly how the spraying is carried out. What technology is used? Who fits it? Is it fitted to military and civilian commercial jet airlines ? And if so – how many people working in the industry know about this, but remain quiet?

I have been researching atmospheric aerosol geoengineering for the past ten years or more*(see end) and I have increasingly come to suspect that the high altitude dispersal method is achieved via mixing nanoparticulates into jet fuels and thereby into the exhaust gases of the aircraft's jet engines. Observation alone, shows that the majority of trails start from the exhaust gases expelled at the back of the engine.

The fact that there are many reports of pilots becoming unconscious and passengers getting sick, due to fumes entering the cockpit and cabin, bears testimony to the existence of some highly toxic substances circulating around the fuselage of modern passenger aircraft. The air conditioning units in such planes are powered by the engines.

What exactly is the composition of the fuel going into these engines?

A recent study by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, aimed to ascertain the composition of the exhaust fumes directly they leave the turbines of high flying jet aircraft. What the initial study found was very revealing: there were sixteen different metals detected in the composition of the engine exhaust – and they included aluminium and barium.

Now anyone with an ounce of intelligence is going to ask why would aluminium and barium be added to commercial jet fuels – not to mention the other fourteen metals.

We already know that 'overt' spraying is carried out by by specially adapted aircraft into which special tanks and equipment are installed, with spraying nozzles fitted externally. Engineers have photographed such apparatus in the fuselage of planes they have worked on, and these pictures can be found on the net.

But this form of 'overt' spraying cannot account for the large number of planes which spread the 'covert' aerosol trails that cover our skies, year in year out, from one end of the world to the other.
There has to be a vast network of internationally interconnected fueling bases involved in order for an operation of this magnitude to be realizable.

Only a highly sophisticated and globally managed operation could mastermind chemtrail activity on this scale.

It is highly probable, that standing behind this operation, is the same psychopathic secretive cabal that is behind all such manipulative global missions. Behind all attempts to take control of the planet and exert 'full spectrum dominance' over humanity as a whole.

A cabal which is familiar with mind control techniques, genetic modification of the food chain and the pharmaceutical repression of natural health. The existence of aluminium as a vaccination adjuvant has already been widely exposed. Its addition to airline fuels has not yet received the same attention – but clearly needs to.

Barium and strontium, the two other widely identified elements detected in water samplings, have equally damaging and degenerating neurological and internal organ repercussions, on both human and animal health, as well as a dangerously repressive affect on plant health. The almost continuous toxic barrage, which all species are subjected to, represents a direct threat to the gene pool upon which all life on earth is predicated.

Let's make 2018 the year in which the brutality of chemtrail activity is decisively brought into the foreground of people's attention worldwide; and let's ensure that we can finally name the names of those behind this mass genocide. A genocide affecting every aspect of the unique biological diversity of our beloved and beleaguered planet Earth.

Foremost in our minds this coming year, should be the need to achieve the complete eradication of
atmospheric aerosol engineering and an end to the secrecy which enables such heinous projects to ever get off the ground.

*http://www.i-sis.org.uk/atmosphericGeoengineering.php

Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer, actor and international activist.
He is President of the International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside. Julian is the author of two acclaimed titles: Changing Course for Life and In Defense of Life, which can be purchased by visiting www.julianrose.info . He has just completed his third book 'Overcoming the Mechanistic Mind' for which he is currently seeking a publisher..
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 08:35 PM   #123
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Atmospheric Geoengineering

Anonymous report confirms climate and weather manipulation experiments conducted by the US and its allies over the past decades Julian Rose

Chemtrails unveiled

Much suspicion has been aroused by unusual cloud formations and abnormal jet trails in the upper atmosphere over the past decade. I have personally witnessed hundreds of days of ‘engineered’' jet trails and clouds, both in the UK and in Poland. However, it has proved extremely difficult to obtain any information about the phenomenon from official sources. When challenged, the normal answer is “nothing unusual is happening.”

This turns out to be very far from the truth. While I concentrate most of this article on just one recent example of professional research on the topic, there have been hundreds of both official and unofficial documents exploring and exposing the military and civil aviation antics responsible for spraying layer upon layer of toxic aerosol “chemtrails” in the sky above our heads on an almost daily basis for the past ten years.

These events go unreported by the mainstream media and governments remain silent. This collusion, whether intentional or otherwise, keeps us in the dark with regard to a grand geo-engineering experiment that has the effect of hobbling our health and severely disrupting the natural environment. And we would have been lost but for the internet.

The Belgium based Belfort Group has brought together more than seven years of research and fact finding on the activities that have become largely known as “Chemtrails”. At an international symposium at Delft University of Technology in Ghent, 29 May 2010, the Belfort Group enlisted Dr Coen Vermeeren, a senior aeronautics engineer, to address the issue. Vermeeren based his presentation on a 300 page scientific report entitled [1] “Case Orange: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” According to Vermeeren, the authors of the report are “a group of scientists/inside who have chosen to remain anonymous.”

In his talk, Dr Vemeeren frankly admits to the existence of “persistent contrails”; he said:

“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do the spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So chemtrails is not new. We know about it.”
From weather manipulation to geoengineering

The Case Orange report reveals the existence of publicly available material indicating that various forms of geoengineering have been going on for “at least 60 years.” Early examples include the 'cloud seeding' UK war operations in Germany during World War Two and the US attempts to dislodge the North Vietnamese during the Vietnam War. However, these pale into insignificance compared with the extensive nature of current activities.

Controversy over the potentially detrimental effects of such activities on both the environment and human health led to 'Environmental Modification' (En Mod) weaponry being banned under the auspices of “The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” in 1987. It is not clear whether this ban was ever fully enforced. However, interest in En Mod soon gained prominence when global warming warnings and accompanying environmental stress issues attracted global scientific interest [2].

The Case Orange report cites a number of US patents for the invention of a “Specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight of material. The seeding material consists of 85 percent metallic particles and 15 percent colloidal silica and silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of up to 1 to 2 weeks.”

Then in 2009, the publication of a report entitled “Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming” put the case for further geo-engineering strategies [3]. These all had the stated intent of creating a layer of reflective cloud capable of bouncing back the sun's rays to prevent unwanted terrestrial climate heating. The report states that the findings of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change supports the proposition outlined in the Hughes Aircraft Patent 1991 on stratospheric seeding for reduction of global warming. Hughes was later bought by Raytheon, The US government's private defence contractor. This is the same company that acquired the contract to build HAARP (The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Gakona, Alaska.
The industrial-military complex for complete weather control against global warming

HAARP is a large 180 antennae grid that projects powerful electromagnetic pulses to heat a specific point in the earth's ionosphere. This has the effect of creating electromagnetic frequencies that can be bounced back to earth at desired locations, causing major disruption to weather and geophysical elements, even deep underground [4, 5]. Up to 3.6 billion watts can be generated by HAARP, heating the ionosphere to over 50 000 degrees and “lifting a 30 square kilometre area of the ionosphere, thereby changing localised pressure systems or even altering the route of jet streams.”

The Case Orange report cites evidence that Raytheon could develop the capacity to “exercise a form of complete “weather control”, a situation bearing a marked similarity to the Monsanto corporation's stated ambition “to control the food chain.” It is noteworthy that there are currently more than 500 ‘climate ready’ genetically modified plant gene patents awaiting licensing approvals in Washington and Brussels. ‘Climate Ready’ GM seeds and plants are promised by their creators to be capable of producing a crop under both flood and drought conditions.

The human rights and environmental watchdog 'ETC Group' describes the atmospheric geoengineering developments as follows: “The roll-out of 'Plan B' (a reference to the use of geoengineering if other efforts to curtail emissions should be deemed ineffective) is being skilfully executed: Prominent high level panels sponsored by prestige groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles in science journals and a line up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the “need to research Plan B.”

Rady Ananda states at the end of his paper [6]: “Case Orange ties-in a 1996 report by top military personnel in the US entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [7] with details such as government spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operation manuals and calls for geoengineering by economists, to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.” Ananda continues [6]: “Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific time line for the use of En Mod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association, a business-government group promoting the 'beneficial' (my emphasis) uses of environmental modification [8]:

2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation

2004 Create smart clouds through nanotechnology, with exponential increase from 2010

2005 Introduce carbon black dust.”
The UN enlisted in geoengineering military combat against climate

In 2007, The World Meteorological Organisation (of the United Nations) published a statement that included “Guidelines for Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” This document clearly implicates the UN in plans to conduct aerosol spraying activities on a wide scale.

In a section of the Case Orange report dealing with 'the bare necessities of geoengineering through cloud generation for the survival of the planet' the authors state: “Our investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenario they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through the generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.

“Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However, since several ionospheric heaters are installed at various places around the globe, one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and the planet.” (my emphasis).

The spraying schemes seem to be organised in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3 day period. Coloured maps of Europe indicate when each regime is to take place.

In the report's section entitled “Recommendations”, the authors state: “Persistent chemtrails have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and to quality of life in general.” The authors call for the full disclosure of the current En Mod activities to the public, as well as for all civil aviation laws to be abided by.
Moratorium on geoengineering activities

One encouraging piece of information is that, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate, the sub-committee of the United Nations Convention of Biodiversity proposed, in May 2010, a moratorium on geoengineering activities [9]. This proposal will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to the UN Convention of Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan in October this year (2010).

The Case Orange report further states that the US permits open air testing of chemical and biological weapons, which overrides the civil law mentioned earlier in this article. The authors paraphrase the permissive law thus: “The Secretary of Defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.” It seems that ‘national security’ concerns can be used by the President to overrule environmental and public health considerations. Is the same true in Europe?

I have provided a basic outline of the main evidence arising from the Case Orange report. It makes an important contribution to opening up otherwise secretive agendas that have no place in any self-declared democracy. Other significant reports include an important paper by Dr Ilya Perlingieri, entitled “The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health” [10]. She states: “Over the past decade, independent testing of Chemtrails around the country have shown a dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano-aluminium coated fibreglass (known as CHAFF), radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, dessicated blood, mould spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide and polymer fibres. Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic [11] and is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminium has a history of damaging brain function.” I need hardly add that ethylene dibromide is a highly toxic agricultural pesticide.

Now that we are party to this information we must to act on it. It is vital that we support the moratorium taking place in Japan this October. Do write to your MPs and tell them that these global activities are not the stuff of 'conspiracy theories'; and that they are taking place without public consultation and without any attempt to warn of their likely repercussions.

Article first published 20/09/10

References

Dr Coen Vermeeren symposium speech, Delft University of Technology, 29 May 2010, http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
“Top science body calls for geoengineering 'plan B', Catherine Brahic: New Scientist, 1/9/2009, http://www.newscientist.com/article/...p-science-body
Mitchell DL and Finnegan W. Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming” Environmental Research Letters 2009, 4, 30 October 2009, http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102
“About HAARP from a paper by Belitsos”, Radical Wisdom, 14 July 2010, http://radwisdom.com/2010/07/14/chem...ove-the-earth/
For further reading on HAARP see Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: “Owning The Weather” Global Research http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...ext=va&aid=319
“Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails” by Rady Ananda, 30 July 2010, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=20369
Col Tamzy J.House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: “Owning the Weather in 2025”, Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17/06/1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/doco...15/v3c15-1.htm
Weather Modification Website: http://www.weathermodification.org/
Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, "In-Depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendations, Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nationa Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/l.9, 15/05/2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbst...14-L-09-en.pdf
“The consequences of toxic metals and chemical aerosols on human health”, Ilya Perlingieri, 12 May 2010, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=19047
See Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_...Rec_Id=PC41174

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/atmosphericGeoengineering.php
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 12-01-2018 at 08:35 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2018, 02:47 PM   #124
TBZD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 22
Likes: 15 (12 Posts)
Default

Why is questioning the chem trail conspiracy theory and the 9/11 conspiracy theory an unquestioning response?
TBZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2018, 03:08 PM   #125
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBZD View Post
Why is questioning the chem trail conspiracy theory and the 9/11 conspiracy theory an unquestioning response?
He is saying that when you ask people what they think of 911 or chemtrails they will usually just parrot the official narrative; he sees that response as one where they have not questioned the official narrative

therefore it is an 'unquestioning response'
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2018, 04:09 PM   #126
TBZD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 22
Likes: 15 (12 Posts)
Default

Equally the same can be said that people are just parroting the conspiracy theory narrative without questioning it. I live near a local airport if the chem trails theory is correct I shouldn't be able to see my hand in front of my face as planes take off and land every few minutes. And which part of the plane do these chemicals come out of? And many more questions which throw the chem trail theory out of the window. Like the whole process from delivering the chemicals to the plane to the spraying of them out of the plane.
It always seems that if you disagree with these conspiracies you get told you are either part of the plot or being duped by NWO.
TBZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2018, 05:32 PM   #127
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBZD View Post
Equally the same can be said that people are just parroting the conspiracy theory narrative without questioning it. I live near a local airport if the chem trails theory is correct I shouldn't be able to see my hand in front of my face as planes take off and land every few minutes. And which part of the plane do these chemicals come out of? And many more questions which throw the chem trail theory out of the window. Like the whole process from delivering the chemicals to the plane to the spraying of them out of the plane.
It always seems that if you disagree with these conspiracies you get told you are either part of the plot or being duped by NWO.
so you think they'd start spraying as the planes land or take off?

the US congress is now talking about geoengineering by spraying from planes

the CIA cheif brennan has spoken about it

there are climate scientists on TV talking about it; david keith did an interview on BBC 'hardtalk' about it

This is not a theory...the technology exists and people are openly talking about it but what they are saying is that it COULD be used

What conspiracy theorists are saying is that it is ALREADY being used

It makes sense as that way there is no issue of any public refusal of the practise
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2018, 08:35 PM   #128
TBZD
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 22
Likes: 15 (12 Posts)
Default

When conspiracy theorists look in the sky and see contrails they don't differentiate they just go look chemtrails.
If they don't spray when they take off who switches them on and off. So all the pilots in the world must know about chemtrails. All the aircraft maintenance people in the world must know about them for when they are servicing the planes. There has to be a part of the plane where they are stored and hydraulics to facilitate the spraying. When I am on a plane sitting by the window why can't I see the chemicals being sprayed.
How do the chemicals get in to the plane. When a plane lands does a truck with a skull and crossbones come out and load the chemicals on to the plane. Where is the spout on the plane for the chemicals to be put in and the spouts for them to come out. Why does nobody ever go "hey what are these spouts for". Where does the truck with the chemicals come from. All these chemical delivery drivers must know about it as well.
When the pilot is checking their weight load to know how much fuel to carry he has to know how many chemicals he is carrying as well in order to calculate properly.

So you see when you refer to non questioning responses that is what I hear all the time from conspiracy theorists. Nobody asks these questions they just believe.
TBZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-2018, 11:12 AM   #129
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBZD View Post
When conspiracy theorists look in the sky and see contrails they don't differentiate they just go look chemtrails.
If they don't spray when they take off who switches them on and off. So all the pilots in the world must know about chemtrails. All the aircraft maintenance people in the world must know about them for when they are servicing the planes. There has to be a part of the plane where they are stored and hydraulics to facilitate the spraying. When I am on a plane sitting by the window why can't I see the chemicals being sprayed.
How do the chemicals get in to the plane. When a plane lands does a truck with a skull and crossbones come out and load the chemicals on to the plane. Where is the spout on the plane for the chemicals to be put in and the spouts for them to come out. Why does nobody ever go "hey what are these spouts for". Where does the truck with the chemicals come from. All these chemical delivery drivers must know about it as well.
When the pilot is checking their weight load to know how much fuel to carry he has to know how many chemicals he is carrying as well in order to calculate properly.

So you see when you refer to non questioning responses that is what I hear all the time from conspiracy theorists. Nobody asks these questions they just believe.
Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Says Chemtrail Death Dumps Must Be Stopped

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-2018, 11:13 AM   #130
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

UN Agenda 21 is Now RESILIENCE . . .After the Fires and Deconstructing Humanity - Deborah Tavares

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-2018, 09:36 AM   #131
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Reggae Legend Lee ‘Scratch’ Perry Calls Out Chemtrails and 5G Pollution
January 18, 2018
Vic Bishop, Staff Writer
Waking Times

It’s been called a conspiracy theory so many times that it’s easy for people to overlook the ever-growing body of evidence that atmospheric spraying (chemtrails) is in fact happening today. It is well-documented that governments the world over have geoengineering programs, which include cloud-seeding and the airborne dispersal of aluminum, barium, strontium, lithium and other toxic agents.

In recent years a handful of celebrities and entertainers have made it clear that they don’t think chemtrails are a just theory. Before he died of an opioid overdose, the artist Prince spoke out about chemtrails in an interview with Tavis Smiley on PBS.

In 2016, Chuck Norris wrote an article for WND entitled, ‘Sky Criminals,’ which was a follow-up to other articles he had penned. Merle Haggard was outspoken about chemtrails, even mentioning them in the song ‘What I Hate.’ Actor Vin Diesel in 2016 posted a photo on his social media, showing his view of the cloud lines in the sky phenomenon.

Recently, legendary reggae music artist and producer Lee ‘Scratch’ Perry has joined the ranks of these well-known entertainers by commenting about chemtrails in a social media post. Additionally, he called out the controversial new 5G network that is being installed everywhere at present.

“HOW MANY MORE HAPPY YEARS WE’LL HAVE WITH THIS NEW 5G TECHNOLOGY, I GOT A MESSAGE FROM MY FRIEND ALEX MARLEY THAT JAMAICA ALSO GOT CHEMTRAILS!!!

SO, THERE IS NO MORE RUNNING AWAY TO JAMAICA FROM THE CHEMTRAILS! POISON EVERYWHERE!!! AND NOW THEY ARE GOING TO ROAST US AND MICROWAVE US WITH THE 5G” ~Lee ‘Scratch’ Perry

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/01/1...-5g-pollution/
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 19-01-2018 at 09:37 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2018, 07:17 AM   #132
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

The 'liberal' media beginning to hint at geoengineering (chemtrails)?

Cloud seeding: Should we be playing god and controlling the weather?


Almost half of the world’s population will be at risk from water shortages by 2030. But is the answer a rather controversial method of inducing rainfall that came to life in the Forties with rocky beginnings, asks Jessica Brown

Jessica Brown
@Jessica_E_Brown
Thursday 18 January 2018 00:00 GMT

If you wanted a guarantee that it wouldn’t rain on your wedding day in 2015, you could have done so for the small price of £100,000. That's what Luxury holiday company Oliver’s Travels offered with a promise of “fair weather and blue skies”, which may sound like just a gimmick to get the loved-up to cough up, but behind its grand promise was the same technology being used by governments around the world to control rain.

Droughts are becoming more commonplace due to climate change, and according to the UN, almost half of the world’s population will be at risk from high water stress by 2030. Countries are trying to mitigate some of this by inducing rainfall with a method called cloud seeding.

Supercooled water in the sky needs particles such as dust or salt (with an ice crystal structure) so they can condense and subsequently fall as rain – but these can often be lacking in the atmosphere. Cloud seeding triggers this process by taking substances up in aircrafts to drop onto clouds.

Playing with the weather might sound like something from the future, but governments have been implementing cloud seeding operations for decades. The method was discovered in 1946 by Dr Vincent Schaefer, who, as Bruce Lambert wrote in his obituary of him, was “hailed as the first person to actually do something about the weather and not just talk about it”.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/lo...-a8160146.html
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2018, 08:21 PM   #133
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Can Russia control the weather? Climate researcher says CIA fears hostile nations are triggering floods and droughts

CIA chiefs fear hostile nations are trying to manipulate the world’s weather
Academic has told of mysterious phone call asking whether foreign countries could be triggering droughts or flooding
CIA is believed to have helped fund a major report into geoengineering

By Fiona Macrae, Science Correspondent In San Jose
Published: 00:10, 16 February 2015 | Updated: 09:11, 16 February 2015

If it seems like it never stops raining, blame the Russians. Or even the North Koreans.

CIA chiefs fear hostile nations are trying to manipulate the world’s weather, a conference heard.

A leading academic has told how he got a mysterious phone call asking whether foreign countries could be triggering droughts or flooding.

Professor Alan Robock, from Rutgers University in New Jersey, said: ‘Consultants working for the CIA rang and said we’d like to know if someone is controlling the world’s climate would we know about it?

‘Of course they were also asking - if we control someone else’s climate would they then know about it.’

The professor is one of many scientists from around the world are actively looking at manipulating the weather as a way of combating climate change.

Geoengineering techniques range from cloud seeding, in which chemicals are sprayed by planes trigger rainfall, to shooting mirrors into space to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.

...he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual conference in San Jose, that the weather has been weaponised in the past.

During the Vietnam War, US scientists tried to increase rainfall to hamper the enemy’s progress by spraying particles into the clouds.

And the CIA seeded clouds over Cuba ‘to make it rain and ruin the sugar harvest’.

To add to the intrigue, the CIA is believed to have helped fund a major report into geoengineering.

Published last week by the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences, the report mentions the ‘US intelligence community’ in its list of sponsors, alongside organisations such as Nasa.

Professor Robock said the CIA had told one of his colleagues it wanted to fund the report, but apparently did not want this fact to be too obvious.

He said: ‘The CIA is a major funder of the National Academies report so that makes me really worried who is going to be in control.’

He added that the tension created by any large-scale meddling in the climate could escalate to such an extent that it would end in all-out war.

The professor said: ‘If one country wants to control the climate in one way, and another doesn’t want it or if they try to shoot down the planes...if there is no agreement it could result in terrible consequences.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz558iaLf6u
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2018, 08:23 PM   #134
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

HAARP: Secret Weapon Used For Weather Modification, Electromagnetic Warfare
By Fred Burks
Global Research, January 05, 2018
Global Research and WantToKnow.info 1 August 2010

HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a little-known, yet critically important U.S. military defense program which has generated quite a bit of controversy over the years in certain circles. Though denied by HAARP officials, some respected researchers allege that secret electromagnetic warfare capabilities of HAARP are designed to forward the US military’s stated goal of achieving full-spectrum dominance by the year 2020. Others go so far as to claim that HAARP can and has been used for weather modification, to cause earthquakes and tsunamis, to disrupt global communications systems, and more.

Major aspects of the program are kept secret for alleged reasons of “national security.” Yet there is no doubt that HAARP and electromagnetic weapons capable of being used in warfare do exist. According to the official HAARP website, “HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.” The ionosphere is the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere which ranges from about 30 miles (50 km) to 600 miles (1,000 km) above the surface of the Earth.

The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments are conducted which use electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams in order to “temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere.” Some scientists state that purposefully disturbing this sensitive layer could have major and even disastrous consequences. Concerned HAARP researchers like Dr. Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa and Alaska’s Dr. Nick Begich (son of a US Congressman) present evidence suggesting that these disturbances can even cause tsunamis and earthquakes.

Two key major media documentaries, one by Canada’s public broadcasting network CBC (see below) and the other by the History Channel (below), reveal the inner workings of HAARP in a most powerful way. The very well researched CBC documentary includes this key quote:

“It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. In January of 1999, the European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/haarp-s...-warfare/20407
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-01-2018 at 08:23 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2018, 08:46 PM   #135
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Geoengineering could have 'catastrophic consequences': Schemes to control climate change could backfire, warn scientists

Geoengineering is the deliberate manipulation of environmental processes
Techniques include reflecting sunlight from space, adding lime to the oceans, and irrigating vast expanses of the deserts to grow trees
Report said geoengineering would be unable to prevent average surface temperatures from rising more than 2°C (3.6°F) by 2100

By Ellie Zolfagharifard
Published: 18:37, 26 February 2014 | Updated: 21:12, 26 February 2014

Schemes to deliberately manipulate the Earth’s climate could prove useless, and at worst harmful, claims a new study.

The strategies include reflecting sunlight from space, adding lime to the oceans, and irrigating vast expanses of the North African and Australian deserts to grow trees.

Known as geoengineering, ideas such as these have gained popularity with some governments attempting to meet their carbon emission targets while still producing cheap energy.

Now researchers at the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research have used software to test the potential benefits and drawbacks of five different geoengineering technologies.

Their study suggests that even when several technologies are combined, geoengineering would be unable to prevent average surface temperatures from rising more than 2°C (3.6°F) above current temperatures by the year 2100.

‘The long-term consequences and side effects of these methods have not been adequately studied,’ said Dr David Keller from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel, Germany.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz558oygCOu
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2018, 08:49 PM   #136
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

RAF rainmakers 'caused 1952 flood'
Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster
John Vidal and Helen Weinstein
Thu 30 Aug 2001 10.56 BST
First published on Thu 30 Aug 2001 10.56 BST

On August 15, 1952, one of the worst flash floods ever to have occurred in Britain swept through the Devon village of Lynmouth. Thirty five people died as a torrent of 90m tons of water and thousands of tons of rock poured off saturated Exmoor and into the village destroying homes, bridges, shops and hotels.
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more

The disaster was officially termed "the hand of God" but new evidence from previously classified government files suggests that a team of international scientists working with the RAF was experimenting with artificial rainmaking in southern Britain in the same week and could possibly be implicated.

Squadron Leader Len Otley, who was working on what was known as Operation Cumulus, has told the BBC that they jokingly referred to the rainmaking exercise as Operation Witch Doctor.

His navigator, Group Captain John Hart, remembers the success of these early experiments: "We flew straight through the top of the cloud, poured dry ice down into the cloud. We flew down to see if any rain came out of the cloud. And it did about 30 minutes later, and we all cheered."

The meteorological office has in the past denied there were any rainmaking experiments conducted before 1955, but a BBC Radio 4 history investigation, to be broadcast tonight, has unearthed documents recently released at the public record office showing that they were going on from 1949 to 1955. RAF logbooks and personnel corroborate the evidence.

Until now, the Ministry of Defence has categorically denied knowledge of any cloud-seeding experiments taking place in the UK during early August 1952. But documents suggest that Operation Cumulus was going on between August 4 and August 15 1952. The scientists were based at Cranfield school of aeronautics and worked in collaboration with the RAF and the MoD's meteorological research flight based at Farnborough. The chemicals were provided by ICI in Billingham.

Met office reports from these dates describe flights undertaken to collect data on cumulus cloud temperature, water content, icing rate, vertical motions and turbulence, and water droplet and ice crystal formation. There is no mention of cloud seeding.

But a 50-year-old radio broadcast unearthed by Radio 4 describes an aeronautical engineer and glider pilot, Alan Yates, working with Operation Cumulus at the time and flying over Bedfordshire, spraying quantities of salt. He was elated when the scientists told him this had led to a heavy downpour 50 miles away over Staines, in Middlesex.

"I was told that the rain had been the heaviest for several years - and all out of a sky which looked summery ... there was no disguising the fact that the seedsman had said he'd make it rain, and he did. Toasts were drunk to meteorology and it was not until the BBC news bulletin [about Lynmouth] was read later on, that a stony silence fell on the company," said Mr Yates at the time.

Operation Cumulus was put on hold indefinitely after the tragedy.

Declassified minutes from an air ministry meeting, held in the war office on November 3, 1953, show why the military were interested in increasing rain and snow by artificial means. The list of possible uses included "bogging down enemy movement", "incrementing the water flow in rivers and streams to hinder or stop enemy crossings", and clearing fog from airfields.

The documents also talk of rainmaking having a potential "to explode an atomic weapon in a seeded storm system or cloud. This would produce a far wider area of radioactive contamination than in a normal atomic explosion".

UK weather modification experiments at the time presaged current practice in the US. The idea was to target "super cool" clouds, and to increase the volume of freezing water vapour particles. Most methods involved firing particles of salt, dry ice, or silver iodide, into clouds, either from an aeroplane or from burners on the ground. The clouds would then precipitate, pulled down below freezing point by the extra weight of dense particles, thus making it rain sooner and heavier than it might have done. Significantly, it was claimed that silver iodide could cause a downpour up to 300 miles away.

Many countries now use the technology, which has considerably improved during the past 50 years.

But controversy still surrounds the efficacy of these early cloud-seeding experiments. In 1955 questions were asked in the Commons about the possibilites of liability and compensation claims. Documents seen by the BBC suggest that both the air ministry and the Treasury became very anxious and were aware that rainmaking could cause damage, not just to military targets and personnel, but also to civilians.

The British Geological Survey has recently examined soil sediments in the district of Lynmouth to see if any silver or iodide residues remain. The testing has been limited due to restrictions in place because of foot and mouth disease, and it is inconclusive. However, silver residue has been discovered in the catchment waters of the river Lyn. The BGS will investigate further over the next 18 months.

Survivors of the Lynmouth flood called for - but never got - a full investigation into the causes of the disaster. Rumours persist to this day of planes circling before the inundation.

? The Day They Made It Rain, Radio 4 , 8.30pm.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/...ysicalsciences
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2018, 08:37 PM   #137
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Scientists Say Airplane Contrails May Be Accidentally Geoengineering the Climate
Derrick Broze
December 22, 2015

Chuck Long is a researcher with the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory at the University of Colorado in Boulder. At the recent American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, Long and his team released their paper, “Evidence of Clear-Sky Daylight Whitening: Are we already conducting geoengineering?” The analysis found that vapor from airplanes may be altering the climate through accidental geoengineering.

According to a 2013 congressional report:

The term ‘geoengineering’ describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.

Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.


Long and his team were investigating the changing amounts of sunlight that reach our planet, processes known as “brightening” or “dimming.” According to CIRES, “Brightening and dimming are overly simplified words that signify increases and decreases in how much light from the Sun (measured as “irradiance” in watts/m2) reaches the planet’s surface — and these measurements are often analyzed under cloud-free conditions.”

In the new study, Long suggests high-altitude “ice haze” may be responsible for a whitish tint to the blue sky. “I’m talking about a sub-visual contrail-generated haze of ice, which we do not classify as a cloud but gives blue sky more of a whitish tint,” Long told CIRES.

“Contrail” is the name for the thin, line-shaped “clouds” sometimes produced by aircraft flying at altitudes several miles above the Earth. The trails are produced from water, turned into ice crystals, and can last several seconds, minutes, or possibly hours. These crystals leave behind a thin, icy haze, scattering the sun’s light in a way similar to Solar Radiation Management geoengineering projects. Long’s research may prove geoengineering is already taking place, albeit inadvertently.
https://www.activistpost.com/2015/12...e-climate.html
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 02:10 PM   #138
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Under a Chemtrail-Laden Sky

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2018, 05:20 PM   #139
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

Lunatic climate change scientists now pushing “outlandish, scary” geoengineering schemes to “cool the planet”
Monday, February 19, 2018 by: Lance D Johnson

The terms “global warming” and “climate change” are part of a broader agenda to justify the ambitions of the global elite who want to openly unleash geoengineering experiments over the Earth’s skies.

In order to get support for this Machiavellian endeavor, the public needs to be convinced that a large-scale climate problem is developing — that the Earth’s temperature is rising uncontrollably. This deception is easy to accomplish by using cherry-picked temperature data and sensationalist scare tactics.

Secondly, people need to feel guilty for being the cause of so-called global warming, then shamed if they do not agree with the theory. If you don’t believe in this monstrosity called climate change, then you are called “anti-science”. Your every exhale of carbon dioxide is considered a burden to the planet, and everyone is to feel guilt for overpopulating the planet.

The third part of the illusion is to convince the public that extreme weather events are the scary consequence of not recognizing that catastrophic “climate change” is real. The few corporations that own the vast media networks in the U.S. can very easily convince the public that global action is needed to fix this destructive “climate change.” The brainwashing is so distinct, that many in the science community now believe that carbon is a toxic molecule that needs to be reduced to near zero levels (even though that would lead to mass death and a die-off of plant life).

Weather events, temperature changes, and seasonal cycles were once just normal events — something people just adapted to. Now, these changes are viewed as some sort of grand cataclysm that requires taxation and intervention, as if the arrogant elite can regulate world temperatures and miraculously save the planet!

Finally, the public needs to be convinced that the answer to this problem is to allow world powers to conduct geoengineering experiments in the skies and in the seas, with chemicals raining down across the land.

Once mocked as just a conspiracy theory, geoengineering is now emerging as the solution to so-called man-made climate change. Harvard University’s David Keith and Antonio Busalacchi of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research are planning to test whether sulfate aerosols can block solar radiation. They are planning a field experiment to shoot sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere. Their goal is to get international support so that the Earth’s stratosphere can be routinely injected with aerosols to block sunlight.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-02-...g-schemes.html
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-02-2018, 01:26 PM   #140
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,120
Likes: 12,583 (7,194 Posts)
Default

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.