Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Electronic Harassment / Mind Control / Subliminal Programing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2018, 07:09 PM   #61
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
By Henry Bodkin
2 May 2018 • 8:54pm

Fresh fears have been raised over the role of mobile phones in brain cancer after new evidence revealed rates of a malignant type of tumour have doubled in the last two decades.

Charities and scientists have called on the Government to heed longstanding warnings about the dangers of radiation after a fresh analysis revealed a more “alarming” trend in cancers than previously thought.

However, the new study, published in the Journal of Public Health and Environment, has stoked controversy among scientists, with some experts saying the disease could be caused by other factors.

The research team set out to investigate the rise of an aggressive and often fatal type of brain tumour known as Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM).

They analysed 79,241 malignant brain tumours over 21 years, finding that cases of GBM in England have increased from around 1,250 a year in 1995 to just under 3,000.

The study is the first recent effort of its kind to analyse in detail the incidence of different types of malignant tumours.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...umours-double/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 08:30 PM   #62
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

is it just the insecticides or is wifi and cellphone radiation a factor in the drop off in insect numbers?

‘The windscreen phenomenon’ - why your car is no longer covered in dead insects
By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor
26 August 2017 • 2:10pm

Wildlife experts have been warning about the alarming decline in insects for decades.

But the fall in numbers of bugs in Britain has now reached such a troubling extent that even motorists are noticing that their windscreens are clear of squashed flies, gnats, moths and wasps.

Where a trip in high summer would once have necessitated taking a squeegee to the front window, now the glass is largely clear, drivers are reporting.

Writing in The Telegraph letters page earlier this week, Michael Groom of Teffont Evias, Wiltshire asked: “Where have all the insects gone? My windscreen remains clear whatever the speed.”

Reader Richard Acland, of Chepstow, in Monmouthshire, also noticed the vanishing bugs, and said he believed insecticides on crops were wiping out insect life, adding: “This is why cars are not bug-splattered anymore.”

And they are not alone in noting the change. Entomologists actually call it ‘the windscreen phenomenon,’ and it is has been noticed across Europe.

An amateur German group called the Krefeld Entomological Society has been monitoring insect numbers at 100 nature reserves in Western Europe since the 1980s. Although there were the annual fluctuations they discovered that by 2013 numbers began to plummet by nearly 80 per cent.

Experts mostly blame intensive agriculture and the use of pesticides over the past 50 years.

Since 2006, beekeepers in Britain have lost about a third of their managed bee colonies each year largely due to the loss of flower-rich grassland which has declined by 97 per cent from the 1930s, and the increased use of insecticides on crops.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...-dead-insects/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 04-05-2018 at 08:31 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 05:35 PM   #63
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

CEO Says Wireless WiFi Receiver Mounted Under Bus Is Safe Because It “Doesn’t Give You Any Tingle or Heat” — Decades of Research Says “Tingle or Heat” Aren’t Required For Harm from WiFi Exposure.
BN Frank
May 4, 2018

Momentum Dynamics Corp envisions a wireless recharging system so extensive that vehicles will get refueled as they drive down roadways.

According to Andy Daga, CEO: “We’re showing it’s safe,” said Daga. “It doesn’t give you any tingle. It doesn’t give you any heat. It doesn’t cause any damage to yourself or your phone.”

No, Andy. Decades of government, independent, industry, and military research has proven that “tingle and heat” aren’t required for people, plants, and animals to be harmed by exposure to cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation and Electrical Pollution (Electrosmog).

Not only that, Andy:

No “safe” level of cell phone or wireless (WiFi) radiation has yet to be scientifically determined for children or pregnant women. They will be riding these buses too.
Radiation exposure is cumulative. . Unpleasant symptoms and conditions may come later.
Research has also proven that exposure can worsen pre-existing conditions even if it didn’t cause them.

From the National Institutes of Health: Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects.

Dr. Madga Havas lists several references to research about non-thermal effects from exposure on her website.

Activist Post’s Catherine Frompovich has written many articles which include references to research on non-thermal effects from wireless WiFi radiation. Here are a handful of them:

2013: 34 Scientific Studies Showing Adverse Health Effects From Wi-Fi
2016: Electromagnetic Fields and Their Effects
2017: Science Speaks Out About Electromagnetic Frequencies Harms
2017: An Open Letter to World Health Organization’s EMF Project Requesting Non-thermal Radiation Adverse Health Effects Be Recognized and Conflicts of Interest Purged from the Evaluation Working Group
2018: Wireless Technology: Understanding Its Effects

Back to Andy’s wireless re-charging bus:

Daga says the system is similar to a wireless recharger for a cellphone, though it transfers energy in far bigger volumes
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...heat-aren.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2018, 05:36 PM   #64
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Samsung 5G Home Router Wins FCC Approval Ahead of Verizon’s 2018 Launch. Now Verizon Should Stop Installing Risky 5G Small Cell Towers in Front of Homes and Everywhere Else – But They Won’t.
BN Frank
May 6, 2018



According to a May 1, 2018 Venture Beat article, a new Samsung 5G router will be available by late October 2018 and it is specifically designed for home and office use.

Also according to the article:

Samsung warns users to keep the devices at least eight inches away from people, in compliance with FCC RF exposure guidelines.

Well, well, well. Samsung and Verizon are apparently aware of the scary-as-hell research on 5G exposure and increasing controversy about 5G small cell tower infrastructure. Other media outlets have been reporting about harm from 5G and other various wireless WiFi radiation and electronic sources as well.

It’s actually no big deal that Samsung refers to FCC RF exposure guidelines. They are 20+ years old and don’t apply to current wireless WiFi sources and how they are used today.

According to The Wall Street Journal in 2014, The FCC hasn’t even been upholding its own outdated regulations in regard to other cell towers. The FCC seems to have sold out to the Telecom Industry a long time ago.
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...-they-won.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2018, 03:54 PM   #65
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Do Your Kids Think Wi-Fi is Magic? Do You?
TOPICS:BN FrankChildrenRadiationWiFi
May 13, 2018

By B.N. Frank

Many people don’t know that Wi-Fi (Wireless Frequency) is Wireless Radiation or Microwave Radiation – like what cooks food in a microwave oven.

In June 2008, the University of California, Irvine provided a statement about Wi-Fi safety concerns and research.

In their statement, they recommended that small children not be exposed to Wi-Fi for long periods. This is also sometimes referred to as The Precautionary Principle. They listed cell phones and laptops as sources of Wi-Fi. They also cautioned about children being exposed to multiple sources of Wi-Fi at the same time.

Since 2008, more research has been done and released to the public about health risks from exposure to Wi-Fi and other sources of Electrical Pollution (Electrosmog). There have also been many warnings (see list below).

Despite this, there STILL has been no safe level of wireless Wi-Fi radiation exposure scientifically determined for children or pregnant women.

Since Wi-Fi is almost everywhere now, small children and everyone else are being exposed to individuals, businesses, medical facilities, schools, etc. operating and using multiple sources of Wi-Fi almost all the time.

Children growing up now probably think Wi-Fi is magic. Most young adults probably think the same. Why wouldn’t they? Many older adults probably think Wi-Fi must be safe or there would be more warnings.

Since 2008, Wi-Fi warnings have been published by many medical professionals and media outlets but they always get lost in a sea of marketing campaigns and legal obstacles.

Of course, tech inventors – including the late Steve Jobs – must have been paying attention all along. For several years they have been deliberately limiting their own kids’ exposure to wireless devices even sending them to private low-tech schools.

Regardless, telecom companies have continued making and marketing wireless devices, products and infrastructure to everyone under the sun from cradle to grave including state and federal elected officials and community leaders in the U.S. and all over the world.

Documentaries have been produced about this including Generation Zapped, Mobilize, Take Back Your Power, and Wi-Fried. SaferEMR.com also provides a running list of U.S. news stations that have aired segments about radiation concerns.

Here is a short list of additional media mentions about medical warnings since 2008:

2009: Dr. Oz warns about cell phone radiation exposure on Good Morning America
2010: GQ magazine: Warning: Your Cell Phone May Be Hazardous to Your Health
2010: NBC News: Is Electrosmog Harming Our Health?
2011: CNN: World Health Organization (WHO): Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk
2012: The American Academy of Pediatrics started expressing concerns about new technology harming kids.
2012: Research determined that cell phone and WiFi radiation can disrupt the blood-brain barrier which may cause it to leak.
2016: Mayo Clinic determined “Sending Text Messages On Your Smartphone Changes The Rhythm Of Your Brain Waves.”
2018: CBS News posted “8 Dumb Things to Boost Cancer Risk”
2018: Dr. Oz airs segment,“The Rise of 5G Cell Towers”
2018: The Nation, Democracy Now, and NPR make accusations regarding cell phone radiation and 5G technology risks, compare The Telecom Industry to “Big Tobacco.”

Many celebrities have spoken publicly about their concerns about health risks from Wi-Fi exposure. The most colorful and memorable example may be this disagreement between sisters Khloe and Kourtney Kardashian.

I’ve never kept up with the Kardashians but this video clip makes me want to reach through the screen and give Kourtney a big bear hug.

There are guidelines and warnings included in manuals for personal electronic and wireless devices. Apparently, Kourtney Kardashian reads them. Most people do not. In fact, many people feel like her sister, Khloe – that we’re all going to die from something anyway so why should we care about Wi-Fi exposure.

For better and for worse, children tend to imitate the adults in their lives. If you aren’t thinking about whether or not Wi-Fi is safe, why should they?
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...ic-do-you.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2018, 03:38 PM   #66
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,406
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

A good reply I think!
Likes: (1)
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2018, 10:02 PM   #67
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Would You Know A Small Cell Tower If You Saw One? Hundreds of Thousands Have Already Been Installed. Millions More Are On Their Way…
BN Frank
May 18, 2018



Ever wonder how many cell towers and antennas are already installed near your home and within your community? AntennaSearch.com will give you a better idea.

Ever since telecom companies started installing cell towers, people from various backgrounds and educational levels have been trying to stop them because of biological, environmental, and property value concerns. Because of this, “stealth” or hidden cell towers have been installed instead of the humongous cell towers that everybody recognizes. In 2006, CBS News aired a segment about this. Regardless, cell towers reduce property value whether they are hidden are not because most people don’t want to live near them.

For the last several years, telecom companies have also been manufacturing and marketing small cell towers along with humongous ones. Because they are smaller, they can be installed pretty much everywhere including in front of homes, in public rights of ways, on top of buildings, etc. Some of them have already been installed and many don’t recognize these as being cell towers.
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...their-way.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2018, 07:47 PM   #68
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Student suicide clusters – is microwave radiation and its technology to blame?
Posted on May 21, 2018

By Dr. Ellis Evans, Natural Blaze

This is very sad and no-one is looking in the right places nor asking the right questions. Nine students from the University of Bristol (UK) committed suicide during the past two years. Bristol University is blaming the students themselves, arguing they suffered ‘mental health problems’. One student was on campus for just 3 weeks and others were third and final years students.

Similarly, York University (UK) also had a suicide cluster of 5 students within a one year period in 2016. Of course, there are many explanations for why student suicides are on the increase and the narrative below is peddled by all the mainstream media outlets(2). “A report by the university in May revealed that half of all ambulances called out to the University of York were for incidents of self-harm or suicide attempts. The proportion of emergency calls of this kind had been growing year on year. The rising costs of higher education and a more difficult labour market post-graduation have both been cited as to blame for the rise in depression.”

What if the university administrators and mainstream media pundits are wrong? What if the cause or causes of these suicides lie elsewhere? If we merely focus on one cause and it’s the wrong cause it means that nothing has changed and even more unfortunate events will unfold in the coming years.

Clearly, there are huge problems in student safety and well-being at some British universities. Statistics from the UK ONS(3) (Office of National Statistics) show that student suicide rates in England and Wales have risen by over 50 per cent since 2007. Thirty years ago I was a student in several UK universities from 1988 – 1995 and I cannot re-call a single suicide incident by anyone (staff included). Something has drastically changed in those intervening years and one issue that has no mention anywhere is internet connectivity, particularly student exposure patterns to pulsed microwave radiation. My interest in these issues piqued when I found out that Bristol University has its own closed 5G network.

Bristol University has world renowned expertise in the prediction and modelling of microwave radiation. It employs researchers and PhD students to carry out its work and has numerous research contracts with the UK government, other research institutes and of course, the telecommunications industries such as Nokia etc. It has a research lab with very expensive antenna test suites and software programme centres. Its activities and mission can be found here: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/engineering/research/smart/

Its mission is to improve 5G technology i.e. model and predict how millimetre 5G radio waves propagate within real-world urban centres. The issue here of course is that no safety testing has been carried out for these high-end microwave frequencies. Secondly, because safety testing is not even on the horizon for many organisations including radiation scientists, how many students, staff and members of the public are inadvertently exposed to 5G frequencies? I wish I could assume that all the research facilities and their transmitting equipment at Bristol University are located and operated in such a way that they pose no biological danger to students working there or living in their halls of residence. Perhaps this centre of excellence for 5G research and the student suicide cluster is pure coincidence?
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/05...radiation.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2018, 07:48 PM   #69
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Mind Control Technology. CIA admits "Telepathic Warfare"

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2018, 08:12 PM   #70
metak88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 232 (150 Posts)
Default

Qualcomm, Facebook plan to trial fixed wireless access at 60 GHz

Quote:
Facebook’s Terragraph focused on multi-gigabit wireless in urban areas

Densely populated urban areas are centers for demand of more bandwidth and faster wireless speeds. At the same time, these areas are challenging environments to replace legacy copper, deploy costly fiber or quickly stand up cellular systems that can reliably support consumer and business connectivity needs. Facebook, which has continued to invest in telecommunications systems largely through its Telecom Infra Project, wants to tackle urban connectivity with its Terragraph solution, and is now planning field trials in conjunction with chipset provider Qualcomm Technologies.

Field trials aren’t set to start until mid-2019, according to the companies. In the interim, the focus is on integrating Qualcomm’s QCA6438 and QCA6428 chipets, based on an early version of the 802.11ay specification. IEEE is still working on a final 802.11ay spec, which builds on 802.11ad, referred to as WiGig.
Whole article: https://www.rcrwireless.com/20180521...s-access-tag17
__________________
In rehab...

Last edited by metak88; 22-05-2018 at 08:24 PM.
metak88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 05:35 PM   #71
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

5G and The AI Control Grid

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2018, 07:08 PM   #72
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

FCC is Tired of “Being Nice” to Municipalities Fighting Small Cell Towers. Wasn’t Trump Supposed to Give the Country Back to the People?
May 29, 2018
By B.N. Frank



The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is the U.S. government agency that regulates new technology.

The FCC has been part of what President Trump refers to as “The Swamp” for over 20 years. One in-depth article describes them as a “Captured Agency.” The former FCC chairman who was appointed by President Obama has worked for the Telecom Industry before and then after he worked at the FCC.

According to a May 22, 2018 article by AGL Media Group, The FCC is tired of “being nice” to state and municipal governments who are resisting the installation of risky new technology including 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT).

The FCC will seek comment on making additional spectrum available in the 26 GHz and 42 GHz bands for flexible terrestrial wireless use in the third installment of its Spectrum Frontiers proceeding, which makes millimeter wave spectrum, in the bands at or above 24 GHz available for 5G and the Internet of Things.
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/05...ll-towers.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 04:10 PM   #73
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Michigan state senator testifies to his “serious concerns” about the health risks of cell phones, WiFi routers, and smart meters
Friday, June 01, 2018 by: Vicki Batts

Concerns about soon-to-be-everywhere 5g technology (and really, WiFi and cellphone radiation in general) are on the rise. Studies continue to point to a substantial number of health risks associated with exposure to the radio-frequency (RF) radiation and electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation these kinds of things emit. Despite the growing body of research which shows radio-frequency radiation is a human health hazard, the mainstream media and other puppets of the tech industry have been quick to try and shut down the conversation about what kinds of ill effects may await us beyond the gates of wireless technology. But, in the U.S., one lone senator stands apart — demanding that these obvious health risks be tackled head-on before the rolling out of an even more potent network tech (5g) gets rolled out nation-wide.

Michigan state senator Patrick Colbeck (R-Canton) took to the Senate floor to address the risks of wireless tech, and to urge his colleagues to vote against a set of bills which would hasten its expansion. Is it really that hard to convince people to exercise caution when heading down an unknown road?
Senator warns against budding wireless tech

Senator Colbeck is a former aerospace engineer and self-described “early adopter” of all things tech — another reason why his warnings about the potential dangers of RF and EMF radiation shouldn’t simply be thrown to wind.

Colbeck reportedly made the statement, “Our primary concern as legislators is not convenience, nor economic growth, per our Michigan constitution, the public health and general welfare of the people of the state are supposed to be our primary concern.” If only more politicians thought that way…
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-...rt-meters.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2018, 08:17 PM   #74
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

5G: Hype Or Horror?
Posted on June 1, 2018
By Catherine J. Frompovich

As a consumer, when you purchase an appliance, an automobile, a computer, an SUV, a TV—whatever—you take for granted the product has been designed and built for safe usage with built-in safety features or devices in order to prevent malfunctions and/or harm occurring during normal use. At least that’s the way it’s supposed to be and why manufacturers usually own product liability insurance in the event of an unseen product failure.

That’s not the case when it comes to microwave industry wireless technology and the “G” updates such as 3G, 4G and 5G to provide ever-faster Wi-Fi service and to establish the global network known as the Internet of Things (IoT). It’s warp speed to implement 5G with all opposition and contradictory science be damned!

What are the G’s about?

“G” relates to “generation of technology.”

1G is analog
2G is digital, voice
3G is digital supported data, but still circuit switched
4G is wireless broadband
5G is the fastest wireless service yet, using millimeter and submillimeter wireless frequencies, which interact directly with human skin, especially the sweat glands. [1]

However, 5 G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation. [2]

It must be noted that 5G frequencies have been developed as “weapons of war” [3] by the U.S., Russia and Chinese defense agencies!

According to Environmental Health Trust [1],

Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai pointed to research that was commissioned by the U.S. Army to find out why people ran away when the beam touched them. “If you are unlucky enough to be standing there when it hits you, you will feel like your body is on fire.” The U.S. Department of Defense explains how “The sensation dissipates when the target moves out of the beam. The sensation is intense enough to cause a nearly instantaneous reflex action of the target to flee the beam.”

What consumers are not told is how 5G mini cell towers will focus their beams and, based upon the above information, will consumers be able to use the technology without sweating like a pig or feeling like their skin is on fire? Those are unknowns no one is questioning, nor is anyone offering reassurances such painful inconveniences for faster Wi-Fi, uploads and games will not happen constantly.

Furthermore, here’s the ‘kicker’ with regard to how the U.S. FCC apparently will get around 5G classification as ‘safe’:

Our skin is our largest organ. Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, Chief Editor of Radiation and Health has stated that the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection usually referred to as ICNIRP – is developing recommendations for public exposure limits of these higher frequencies is planning to classify all the skin in the human body as belonging to the limbs rather than to the head or torso. Leszczynski cautioned that, “If you classify skin as limbs – no matter where the skin is – you are permitted to expose it more than otherwise.”

We assume that in terms of US exposure limits this means that the skin will be classified as “an extremity”. Extremities are allowed to be exposed to much higher radiation levels than the brain, torso, legs and arms. In the USA extremities -in regards to wireless radiation- are specifically wrists and hands, ankles and feet and the ear. [1] [CJF emphasis]

Take note how ICNIRP wants to reclassify human anatomy.

That definitely is out of their scope of expertise, as they are not a medical, biological or physiological trade association, and that biological recommendation should be rejected by all agencies, especially the WHO and FCC!

ICNIRP is a microwave industry trade association which, in my opinion, ought to be put out of business, since it refuses to acknowledge the microwave industry’s own findings (32% of studies paid and performed by the wireless industry) that non-thermal radiation adverse health effects occur.
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/06...or-horror.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 04:45 PM   #75
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

A professor of toxicology explains how EMFs cause biological damage and even cancer
Sunday, June 03, 2018 by: Tracey Watson

There is something all around us that we cannot see, that can cause serious health problems like cancer, but that we might not even know about. You may never have heard of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and even if you have, might be unaware of their damaging effects. Nonetheless, they are all around us, and it is important to explain just what they are and how they affect us.

In simple terms, EMFs are invisible low or high frequency forces that emanate from electrical and wireless devices. The electricity and appliances we use on a daily basis all emit low frequency EMFs, while wireless devices like routers generate high frequency EMFs.

Research has linked a variety of problems including headaches, fatigue, digestive issues and sleeping problems to both low and high frequency EMFs. There is also evidence that EMFs cause more serious conditions like autoimmune disorders and certain types of cancer. (Related: Shielding EMFs found to reduce 90% of symptoms in people with autoimmune disease.)

So, why exactly do these common forces cause so much damage? Paul Héroux, Ph.D., a researcher and professor of toxicology and health effects of electromagnetism with the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University in Montreal, recently explained in more detail to Dr. Mercola of Waking Times.
A professor explains

Having studied electrical power transmission lines, Héroux started researching the effects of the electromagnetic fields emitted by such lines.

“I got involved in biology, followed courses in medicine and became, so to speak, a different person from what my supervisors initially would have expected me to be,” he told Waking Times.

His research turned him into an expert on the effects of these fields on the human body, and his desire to help protect the health of humans and the environment moved him to join McGill’s Faculty of Medicine.

The first thing that Héroux explained is that low-frequency fields, high-frequency fields, electric fields, microwaves and magnetic fields all have similar biological effects on the human body.

“It’s true that frequency influences the effects,” Héroux noted, “but basically … I could, using an electric field or a magnetic field, produce the same effect in a cell. Most higher frequency signals have enough low-frequency components to have a lot in common with low-frequency components.”

He also noted that even though EMFs do not generate heat, they nonetheless cause damage – despite what telecommunications companies might claim.

“Covering the whole spectrum, there is no doubt that there are biological effects,” he explained. “There’s no doubt there are substantial health effects that we have been experiencing for a long time, and that have been increasing our health bills.”
It doesn’t take much

Héroux and his team discovered that EMFs at levels as low as 60 Hertz (Hz) can drastically affect the development of cancer cells, impair fertility and increase the risk of miscarriage.

Waking Times explains Héroux’s theory of why this damage occurs:

The mechanism of action proposed by Héroux involves the enzyme ATP synthase, which passes currents of protons through a water channel (similar to current passing through a wire). The protons have to go through about 20 molecules of water to get through this channel. ATP synthase is extremely ancient and common to all living systems. It basically generates energy in the form of ATP from ADP, using this flow of protons.

Magnetic fields can change the transparency of the water channel to protons, thereby reducing the current. As a result, you get less ATP, which can have systemwide consequences, from promoting chronic disease and infertility to lowering intelligence.

Héroux essentially believes that EMFs substantially increase oxidative stress, which damages proteins and cell membranes and breaks DNA bonds.

A study published in the journal Free Radical Biology and Medicine noted that excessive oxidative stress causes chronic inflammation, which in turn causes many diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Unfortunately, Héroux warns that most of us essentially live in an environment where we are surrounded by a dangerous level of EMFs all the time. It is nonetheless wise to try to mitigate the damage as much as possible by lowering exposure to wireless routers, smart meters, microwaves and other non-essential sources of electromagnetic frequencies.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-...ge-cancer.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2018, 04:47 PM   #76
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Newcastle fells more trees than any other UK council
City has cleared 8,414 trees in last three years – twice as many as any other authority


Helen Pidd North of England editor
Sun 3 Jun 2018 18.33 BST
First published on Sun 3 Jun 2018 18.32 BST

Newcastle has become the tree-felling capital of the UK after the council chopped down almost twice as many trees as any other local authority.

More than 110,000 trees have been cut down by councils across the UK in the last three years, according to figures gathered under the Freedom of Information (FOI) act by the Sunday Times. Some 8,414 were in Newcastle, more than in any other rural or urban local authority. Wiltshire was next, having felled 4,778 in the same period, followed by Edinburgh with 4,435.

There are an estimated 800,000 trees in Newcastle, both in urban and rural areas, according to the city council, which says 0.35% of its tree stock has therefore been felled in each of the past three years.

Trees in Newcastle have been removed from a diverse range of locations such as plantations, woodlands, open green spaces, cemeteries and parks as well as residential areas including residential properties.

In contrast, there are approximately 4.5m trees in Sheffield – 36,000 of which are classed as “street trees”. Sheffield, which has been battling with protestors over plans to fell up to 17,000 of its street trees, has actually “only” cut down 3,529 since 2015, the FOI figures show.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...her-uk-council
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2018, 01:26 PM   #77
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,406
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea
1G is analog
1G is the BEST!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2018, 04:07 PM   #78
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Great tree massacre: Councils have cut down 110,000 trees in a desperate bid to save money (no - to make 5G possible and unless we say ENOUGH you've seen nothing yet)
Andrew Cheetham
5 hours ago



Great tree massacre: Councils have cut down 110,000 trees in a desperate bid to save money
Sheffield council’s £2billion tree-felling campaign triggered furious protests
Thousands of trees in the city were assessed as dying, diseased or dangerous
An investigation found the city felled 10% of its tree population in three years

By Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail
Published: 23:54, 3 June 2018 | Updated: 08:06, 4 June 2018

More than 110,000 trees have been felled in three years as councils strive to save money.

Notoriously, Sheffield council’s £2billion tree-felling campaign has triggered furious protests as locals claim perfectly healthy trees are being chopped down.

Thousands of trees in the city, assessed by the contractor Amey as dying, diseased or dangerous, have been axed.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ave-money.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2018, 04:07 PM   #79
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

FCC Chair Ajit Pai Denies (lies about) 5G Health Risks to Congress

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2018, 05:13 PM   #80
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Factual Microwave Radiation Research Consumers Need To Know Before Embracing 5G
Posted on June 6, 2018
By Catherine J. Frompovich

Microwave technology seems to have been around ‘forever’, so that’s probably why very few tech consumers question its safety. However, consumers should know the latest and most ‘coveted’ update to technology is the Internet of Things, which will become “Big Brother Personified.”

Not only will the IoT report back (i.e., spy?) to high-speed computer data centers consumers EVERY activity, IoT will super-saturate your physical body and brain with extremely rapid oscillation Gigahertz (GHz) frequencies needed to implement IoT, which probably will become physically uncomfortable, as being reported by current research studies.

The U.S. military has pressed hard for each generation of microwave updates to the point where 5G is their “war weapon” that will be pressed in to civilian use for higher speed Wi-Fi.

Personally, I’ve been a health issues researcher/writer/author since the late 1970s and the plans for expanded microwave technologies, e.g., 5G and higher, cause me grave concern, especially because of the resolute lack of transparency concerning the harms from its thermal and non-thermal waves, which deliberately have been secreted from consumers—similar to what the tobacco industry and other vested interests have done in order to mainstream technologies harming human health, wildlife, the environment and ruined the Planet’s hydrologic system by implementing Solar Radiation Management, which some refer to as “chemtrails.”

With the last paragraph’s concerns in mind, I’ve gotten together an anthology of probable lesser-known Microwave, ELF, EMF, RFR research I think consumers should know—and save—to understand how the proverbial wool has been pulled over your eyes about a technology you have fallen in love with; become addicted to; and are clamoring for more and higher generation speeds, while really not knowing nor understanding the harm it is doing to you and especially the children, who are the most vulnerable to cellular damage.

>>>A Retrospective Microwave Research Anthology<<<

Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation, Proceedings on an International Symposium, October, 1973 [October 15-18, 1973, Warsaw, Poland]

Reviewed by Emanuel Landau

Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation, Proceedings on an International Symposium, October, 1973. Poland Government, WHO and USHEW. Polish Medical Publishers.

347 pp. 1974. $10 U.S.A., $12.50 Foreign. NTIS PB 239-554.

“This volume represents the proceedings of the only truly international symposium on the effects of microwave radiation which was held in Warsaw in October, 1973. In addition to the presented papers of the participants, the work contains succinct summaries of the discussions and a list of sound conclusions and recommendations. Differences in research findings are not glossed over. Particularly impressive to this reviewer is the absence of ideological statements and judgments. It is a “must” book for any serious student of the health effects of exposure to microwave radiation.

“While this publication does not and cannot present definitive findings, it does represent a valuable state of the art review with all the inconsistencies and disagreements noted and discussed.

A special merit is that it makes possible more details of the studies done by the leading research investigators for both high and low level exposure situations than has been previously available. Even more detail is needed for proper assessment, but this symposium clearly will contribute to the necessary reconciliation of the wide divergence of research results reported for cataractogenesis and “microwave neurosis” as well as for other stated adverse effects.”

Emanuel Landau, PhD
APHA Project Director
Environmental Health Hazards
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...0794-0077c.pdf
Am J Public Health. 1975 July; 65(7): 751. PMCID: PMC1775882

[CJF emphasis]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...775882/?page=1

Session A. General Effects of Microwave Radiation (80 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...s-of-mw-a1.pdf

Session A continued (27 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...of-mw-a2-1.pdf

Session B. Influence of Microwave Radiation on the Nervous System and Behavior (23 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...s-of-mw-b1.pdf

Session B continued (20 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...s-of-mw-b2.pdf

Session C. Effects of Microwave Radiation at the Cellular and Molecular Level (40 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...s-of-mw-c1.pdf

Session C continued (10 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...s-of-mw-c2.pdf

Session D. Measurements of Microwave Radiation (58 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...ds-of-mw-d.pdf

Session E. Occupational Exposure and Public Health Aspects of Microwave Radiation (48 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...ds-of-mw-e.pdf

Session F. Presentation and Discussion of Session Reports, Conclusions (Including Future Research Needs) and Recommendations (27 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...ds-of-mw-f.pdf

Session I. List of Participants (15 pages)
https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-c...ds-of-mw-i.pdf

***

A Mother’s Tragic Story about In-school Wi-Fi Damage to her 15-year-old daughter, who suffered with EHS from Wi-Fi in school, which finally led to the daughter’s eventual suicide: Why Die for Wi-Fi? My Child Did – Will Yours? / Debra Fry, May 3, 2016

***

A pioneer researcher, the late Dr. Ross Adey, in his last publication in Bioelectromagnetic Medicine (P. Roche and M. Markov, eds. 2004) concluded:

“There are major unanswered questions about possible health risks that may arise from exposures to various man-made electromagnetic fields where these human exposures are intermittent, recurrent, and may extend over a significant portion of the lifetime of the individual.”

“Epidemiological studies have evaluated ELF and radiofrequency fields as possible risk factors for human health, with historical evidence relating rising risks of such factors as progressive rural electrification, and more recently, to methods of electrical power distribution and utilization in commercial buildings. Appropriate models describing these bioeffects are based in non-equilibrium thermodynamics, with nonlinear electrodynamics as an integral feature. Heating models, based in equilibrium thermodynamics, fail to explain an impressive new frontier of much greater significance.

….. Though incompletely understood, tissue free radical interactions with magnetic fields may extend to zero field levels.” (2)

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Section 1 (Summary for the Public), Pg. 7/22 of 1479

***

Children are at increased risks from Radiofrequencies (RFs) emitted by microwaves according to the Presidential Cancel Panel 2010 and the American Academy of Pediatricians.

“There is little doubt that exposure to ELF causes childhood leukemia.”

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Pg. 8/23 of 1479

***

What is remarkable about studies on DNA, genes and proteins and EMFs is that there should be no effect at all if it were true that EMFs is too weak to cause damage. Scientists who believe that the energy of EMFs is insignificant and unlikely to cause harm have a hard time explaining these changes, so are inclined to just ignore them. The trouble with this view is that the effects are occurring. Not being able to explain these effects is not a good reason to consider them imaginary or unimportant.

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Section 1, Pg. 16/31 of 1479

***

Sixteen nations: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Namibia, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom have ruled the thermal RF radiation levels set by the National Council of Radiation Protection (NCP), the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are obsolete and do not adequately protect the public, so they are taking action to mitigate public risks.

Source: BioInitiative 2012

***

“The IARC Monographs classification of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) covers the entire radiofrequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum (30 kHz-300 GHz). Within this spectrum, the electromagnetic fields around (or the radiation emitted by) mobile telephones represent the most intense and most wide-spread exposure situation, for which a small increase in risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma has been found in the group of ‘heavy users’. Other devices that emit the same type of RF radiation – base-station antennas, radio/tv antennas, WiFi stations, smart meters – fall under the same evaluation. However, because the exposure levels for many of these other devices and exposure situations are so much lower than the exposure to someone who has a functioning cell phone against her/his ear, the risk will be considerably less (although the hazard still exists).” [CJF emphasis]

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Section 22 (Precaution in Action – Global Public Health Advice Following BioInitiative), Pg. 28/1325 of 1479

***

The US Government Accountability Office published a report in 2012 urging the US Federal Communications Commission to revisit the outdated safety standards for the exposures from wireless devices. (19)

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Section 22, Pg. 18/1315 of 1479

***

The Report noted that the FCC’s RF energy exposure limit may not reflect the latest research.

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Section 22 Pg. 19/1316 of 1479

***

Adverse health effects occur at levels much lower than what the FCC claims to be safe.

Non-thermal adverse health effects from microwave RFs have been documented at extremely low power densities in these ranges: microwatt, nanowatt, picowatt and femtowatt.

A microwatt (µW) equals one millionth of a watt
A nanowatt (nW) equals one billionth of a watt
A picowatt (pW) equals one trillionth of a watt
A femtowatt (fW) equals on quadrillionth of a watt

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt ]

“EMF exposure can change gene and/or protein expression in certain types of cells, even at intensities lower than ICNIRP recommended values.” [CJF emphasis]

Source: BioInitiative 2012*, Table 1-1 BioInitiative Report Overall Conclusions, Section 5 Genotoxicity Pg. 2 of 16

***

Dr. Henry Lai, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Bioengineering, University of Washington, discovered in 1995 damage to rat brains at Radiofrequency radiation levels deemed as ‘safe’ by the FCC.

Research scientist George Carlo’s independent research established wireless radiation RAISED the risk of brain cancer, which led the cellular communications industry to discredit Carlo’s work.

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) cell phone radiation study data released in March of 2018 provided evidence that cell phone microwave radiation caused cancers in rats, e.g., rare schwannoma heart tumors and brain tumors.

“The study looked at only 2G and 3G frequencies, which are still commonly used for phone calls. It does not apply to 4G or 5G, which use different frequencies and modulation, he [John Bucher, a senior scientist with NTP] said.” [CJF emphasis]

Source: Reuters

***

Based upon current research findings, the FCC’s 1996 recommended RF limits/safety standard of 0.6mW/cm2 for 30 minutes of exposure time is seriously flawed and must be corrected to reflect dangers inherent from non-ionizing RF radiation.

Proof of the above statement are 27 citations of scientific studies reporting adverse health effects at levels less than 0.00063 m/W/cm2. These studies can be found enumerated at http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/. There are too many to list here, but it is important to list:

DEFINING A NEW ‘EFFECT LEVEL’ FOR RFR
On a precautionary public health basis, a reduction from the BioInitiative 2007 recommendation of 0.1 uW/cm2 (or one-tenth of a microwatt per square centimeter) for cumulative outdoor RFR down to something three orders of magnitude lower (in the low nanowatt per square centimeter range) is justified.

A scientific benchmark of 0.003 uW/cm2 or three nanowatts per centimeter squared for ‘lowest observed effect level’ for RFR is based on mobile phone base station-level studies. Applying a ten-fold reduction to compensate for the lack of long-term exposure (to provide a safety buffer for chronic exposure, if needed) or for children as a sensitive subpopulation yields a 300 to 600 picowatts per square centimeter precautionary action level. This equates to a 0.3 nanowatts to 0.6 nanowatts per square centimeter as a reasonable, precautionary action level for chronic exposure to pulsed RFR.

These levels may need to change in the future, as new and better studies are completed. We leave room for future studies that may lower or raise today’s observed ‘effects levels’ and should be prepared to accept new information as a guide for new precautionary actions.

Source: BioInitiative 2012 “A Rationale for Biologically-based Exposure Standards for Low-Intensity Electromagnetic Radiation” Conclusions

***

However, there are several specific studies performed using various low level µW/cm2 I’d like to bring to your attention:

1 – 0.13 µW/cm2
Radiofrequency radiation from 3G cell towers decreased cognition, well-being. Zwamborn, 2003. https://www.rsm.govt.nz/projects-auc...ission-261.pdf

2 – 0.168-1.053 µW/cm2
Irreversible infertility in mice after 5 generations of exposure to Radiofrequency radiation from an ‘antenna park’. Magras & Zenos, 1997. https://www.rsm.govt.nz/projects-auc...ission-261.pdf

3 – 0.16 µW/cm2
Motor function, memory and attention span of school children affected in Latvia. Kolodynski, 1996.

Resource: Power Density: Radio frequency Non-Ionizing Radiation [14 pages with hundreds of citations] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=rep1&type=pdf

4 – 60 to 100 ?W/m2
Whole human body chronic exposure to base station Radiofrequencies showed increased stress hormones; dopamine levels were substantially decreased; there were higher levels of adrenaline and nor-adrenaline; and chronic physiological stress was produced in cells after 1.5 years. Buchner, 2012.

Source: Reported Biological Effects of RF & Microwave Radiation Power Density ?W/m2
http://www.stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-...fectsChart.pdf

5 – Interestingly, between 2007 and mid-2012, sixty-nine (69) new ELF-EMF study papers were published regarding neurological effects from ELFs-EMFs. Of those 69 papers, 93% (64) show adverse effects, whereas only 5 (7%) show no adverse effects. Lai, 2012.

Source: https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520939118.pdf [Pg. 10 of 17 pages]

6 – Numerous sperm studies have been replicated showing the adverse effects on sperm quality, motility and pathology in men who use and wear live cell phones on their bodies, PDA or pagers on their belts or in a pants pocket. Here’s one example:

See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4074720/

CONCLUSIONS

[a] Long–term semen exposure in the area of mobile phone RF–EMR leads to a significant decrease in the number of sperm with progressive movement and an increase in those with non–progressive movement.
[b] Prolonged direct mobile phone exposure may bring about sperm DNA fragmentation
[c] For men readying themselves for fatherhood, especially when registered fertility problems exist, it would be better to avoid holding a mobile phone in a trouser pocket for long periods of time.

Other papers reporting sperm being affected by RFs-EMRs include: Agarwal et al, 2008; Agarwal et al, 2009; Wdowiak et al, 2007; De Iuliis et al, 2009; Feyes et al, 2005; Aitken et al, 2005; Kumar, 2012.

***

There are in excess of 4,000 scientific studies reporting biological and adverse health effects from non-thermal radiation exposure and yet the FCC and microwave trade associations deny them, plus do not factor those findings into establishing correct ELF-EMF-RFR safety guidelines.

Could be it there are no safe parameters that can be met relative to man-made microwaves non-thermal non-ionizing radiation?
read on here https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/06...racing-5g.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.