Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Today's News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2014, 11:15 PM   #80781
craftyhen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default Wangless & slosh

Dame Butler Sloss is the sister of Michael Havers, the Attorney General who covered up the Elm Guest House story originally.

Her husband has been accused of using under age prostitutes in Kenya. They are taking the piss.


http://google-law.blogspot.co.uk/201....html?spref=tw
craftyhen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 11:17 PM   #80782
nelo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 461 (239 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurker View Post
Anyone who heads up this inquiry will be criticised for being part of the establishment.
Even if they attempt a whitewash, they cannot escape all the facts that are already in the public domain and any attempted whitewash will not be accepted by the public.

I wonder if they will ask David Icke to give evidence. He named names many years ago. His 'dossiers' are still available today. He could probably tell you all the names in the Dicken's dossier.
You are right, it won't be accepted because it will be bullshit!

And No they won't ask Dave.

Last edited by nelo; 08-07-2014 at 11:36 PM.
nelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 12:09 AM   #80783
howard crane
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 502
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default BBC know nuffink, honest govna!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkzxGr4Yx8U
howard crane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 12:32 AM   #80784
lcp.
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,772
Likes: 13 (12 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rabiesthedog View Post
Just shared this info on my FB account.

This should be interesting. I haven't used FB in months and months. Mainly because its a bag of shite!! Well it does prompt me to 'Share' my thoughts and such. My few hundered 'Friends' Hopefully will find this more interesting and informative than the usual pics of fry ups and glasses of wine..

Chances are it will be scrolled passed so they can get the latest goss on what the neighbour opposite has been doing in the shed at 3am.
Just lately Aangirfan blogs I put on Facebook are disappearing.
Funny that!
lcp. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 01:03 AM   #80785
nelo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 461 (239 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard crane View Post
Cushty!
nelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 08:51 AM   #80786
nickc
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 292
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Geoffrey Dickens Dossier

Geoffrey Dickens Dossier...

Child abuse dossier 'without question circulated widely'

9 July 2014

"Copies of a dossier containing details of alleged child abuse operating among MPs in the 1970s-80s were "without question" circulated widely around Westminster, according to a Labour MP.

John Mann said there "was no question there were multiple copies" of the dossier, which is believed to have been destroyed, and "some people, who may still be working" will have seen it."

Video interview here:

www.itv.com/news/update/2014-07-09/child-abuse-dossier-without-question-circulated-widely/
nickc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 09:06 AM   #80787
lurker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 109
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28225043

Questions raised over Butler-Sloss inquiry position

Elizabeth Butler-Sloss was chosen by the home secretary to head the inquiry into allegations of historical abuse.

But Labour's Simon Danczuk said her position was tainted because her late brother, Sir Michael Havers, was Attorney General in the 1980s
lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 09:44 AM   #80788
dolores1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 14,891
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Default

Butler-Sloss is not acceptable.

Please help ensure she is not given charge over any inquiry.
I doubt they will try and find anyone with clean hands, her's certainly are not.


D
dolores1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 09:56 AM   #80789
howard crane
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 502
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Bulter-Sloss and her whitewash

Watch: Cleveland: Unspeakable Truths
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0oTaxZaBvc#t=14
Stuart Bell, mentioned in the 1997 Channel 4 documentary, his name appears in the Elm Guest House visitor list

In the Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland 1987. By Elizabeth Butler-Sloss: Butler-Sloss makes no mention of the scale of the abuse of children.

Quote:
p245

Recommendations

1. Recognition of sexual abuse. There is a need:

a. To recognise and describe the extent of the problem of child sexual abuse;

b. To receive more accurate data of the abuse which is identified.

"I cannot find any mention in the report of your opinion as to how much child abuse actually occurred. Is it correct, that you did not offer an opinion?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
17sep02

Recorded Delivery

Second copy sent Recorded Delivery 26sep02



Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss,

Higher Marsh Farm,

Marsh Green,

Exeter EX5 2EX



Dear Lady Elizabeth Butler-Sloss,



Re the Cleveland Report.

I cannot find any mention in the report of your opinion as to how much child abuse actually occurred. Is it correct, that you did not offer an opinion?



Best wishes,


Ivor Catt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ivorcatt.com/2210.htm
Butler-Sloss is going to whitewash the cover-up!

Last edited by howard crane; 09-07-2014 at 10:39 AM. Reason: added URL
howard crane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 10:27 AM   #80790
roobarbtart
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Tim Fortescue clip on LBC yesterday. James O'Brien played a 1995 clip where this ex-Whip stated that a hypothetical problem facing an MP, such as one "involving little boys" would be sorted out if they came to the Whips. Would this include murdering or paying off and relocating the boys?
He also states that "once they have been involved in something like this, they would do anything for us"
Is this sinister or what?
Blackmailed paedophiles in the government doing whatever they are asked, with victims that have conveniently disappeared. Easy to do with kids from orphans' homes who can just be written off as "ran away".

O'Brien, showing his usual naivete, asked why the victims were not coming forward, and that it was hard to accept the accusations without people stepping up to report the perpetrators. Unfortunately nobody rang the idiot to point out that the people being accused had the power to "remove" their victims!

Last edited by roobarbtart; 09-07-2014 at 11:21 AM.
roobarbtart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 10:30 AM   #80791
theroach
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 30 (21 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roobarbtart View Post
Tim Fortescue clip on LBC yesterday. James O'Brien played a 1995 clip where this ex-Whip stated that a hypothetical problem facing an MP, such as one "involving little boys" would be sorted out if they came to the Whips. Would this include murdering or paying off and relocating the boys?
He also states that "once they have been involved in something like this, they would do anything for us"
Is this sinister or what?
Blackmailed paedophiles in the government doing whatever they are asked, with victims that have conveniently disappeared. Easy to do with kids from orphans' homes who can just be written off as "ran away".
The abuse victims are classed as 'VERMIN'...once you understand the mindset of this establishment (something many still fail to do), all becomes very clear and very quickly.

Last edited by theroach; 09-07-2014 at 10:31 AM.
theroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 10:50 AM   #80792
howard crane
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 502
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roobarbtart View Post
Tim Fortescue clip on LBC yesterday. James O'Brien played a 1995 clip where this ex-Whip stated that a hypothetical problem facing an MP, such as one "involving little boys" would be sorted out if they came to the Whips. Would this include murdering or paying off and relocating the boys?
He also states that "once they have been involved in something like this, they would do anything for us"
Is this sinister or what?
Blackmailed paedophiles in the government doing whatever they are asked, with victims that have conveniently disappeared. Easy to do with kids from orphans' homes who can just be written off as "ran away".
Just imagine if there were a large group of young males that frequented the Elm Guest House to pleasure the guests, and that you wanted to say get rid of them............

............now you get the group of young males to go to a location for a tea or a juice say in a cafe beneath Kings Cross Station............

..........then a mysterious fire breaks out.......................

............and you get a mysterious shadowy figure of say Peter Powers (of 7/11 fame) to become then multi agency operations manager of the fire disaster..........

........you know it might just work!?!

Last edited by howard crane; 09-07-2014 at 10:51 AM. Reason: typo
howard crane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 10:53 AM   #80793
roobarbtart
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 53
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The point of this is that Fortescue was a Whip in Thatcher's government, which is the government that was in power when many of these paedophiles such as Savile, were up to their tricks. This was more or less an admission that the matters now coming to light really happened!
For non-UK readers, a Whip is an official who chases politicians to force them to vote on parliamentary matters and to toe the party line. http://www.parliament.uk/about/mps-a...incipal/whips/
At this time and in the previous Tory government, much pressure was being exercised to legalize paedophilia. UK TV programmes tended to show young girls as sex objects for much older men (On the Buses, Please Sir, Benny Hill etc). UK newspapers often had topless supposedly 16 year old girls on page 3.
Countries like Denmark were publishing child pornography in the name of "sexual freedom", which was the 1970s follow on to the 1960s liberation of women following "the pill". This was accepted to some extent much like the propounding of gay rights in the 1990s, but unlike homosexuality, freedom to practice paedophilia was fought and defeated by many people.
I even remember going into a newspaper shop at this time and seeing imported child porn magazines on open display. They were sealed, though.
I was told many years ago by an ex police officer that in the 1980s he was involved on a raid on a paedophile ring where several high ranking Thatcher government members were involved. They were all quietly let out of the premises with no action being taken against them. That was why he became an ex-policeman.

Today LBC had Nick Ferrari airing the old chestnut of lowering the UK age of consent to 14. Wouldn't the Paedos love that?

Last edited by roobarbtart; 09-07-2014 at 11:23 AM.
roobarbtart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:22 AM   #80794
jollyolly
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 269
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roobarbtart View Post
Tim Fortescue clip on LBC yesterday. James O'Brien played a 1995 clip where this ex-Whip stated that a hypothetical problem facing an MP, such as one "involving little boys" would be sorted out if they came to the Whips. Would this include murdering or paying off and relocating the boys?
He also states that "once they have been involved in something like this, they would do anything for us"
Is this sinister or what?
Blackmailed paedophiles in the government doing whatever they are asked, with victims that have conveniently disappeared. Easy to do with kids from orphans' homes who can just be written off as "ran away".
This, of course, was the whole point of the exercise; to blackmail people into doing anything for them. I too find this extremely sinister, not least because now we can put at least one face to 'them'. We thought these were faceless spooks, hiding in shadow, taking instruction from whoever. Yet here's one of them talking quite openly about it. Astonishing.

Last edited by jollyolly; 09-07-2014 at 11:23 AM.
jollyolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:29 AM   #80795
jollyolly
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 269
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

And on the matter of Butler Sloss; she's a Parliamentarian, sits in the Lords. The biggest single aspect of this matter is that of a nonce ring of Parliamentarians were protected (and according to Fortescue, blackmailed) by other Parliamentarians. And now, unless I've missed something, Parliament is going to investigate itself.
jollyolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:32 AM   #80796
theroach
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 30 (21 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyolly View Post
This, of course, was the whole point of the exercise; to blackmail people into doing anything for them.
Yup...that is the mechanism and one I've known about for years.
theroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:44 AM   #80797
sammydavissenior
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 47
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Delores

David Shayler /Delores needs to start talking . He knows !
sammydavissenior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:47 AM   #80798
northernlass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 823
Likes: 140 (82 Posts)
Default

re the kingscross fire? is that the one with the african chap who was the survivor?
I remember him saying one of the exits was blocked up with furniture so he couldnt get out and had to find another exit
it struck me as very odd...i mean who would use wood to block an exit....
he said it on an interview on this morning...no one questioned him about that huge piece of info of course..they just moved topic on
i did mention it ages ago on here ..i think someone tried to pull up the interview footage
northernlass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 11:59 AM   #80799
sammydavissenior
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 47
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default ITV This Morning

ITV Information hunter gatherers......

Nicola Bryan from ITV has asked Tom O Carroll for an interview , he set up PIE..... didnt PIE get a load of money off the GOVERNMENT ? Why is that then ?

How do I know this? Because TOC has a blog that is current still spreading sick pervervted message .... you would think in a normal world he would be shut down like they try to do to Chris Spivey wouldnt you?

Was PIE set up by the security services so sick people would willingly set themselves up for blackmail?

Who is going to investigate the MI* people & Special Branches ?
sammydavissenior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2014, 12:03 PM   #80800
sammydavissenior
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 47
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

sammydavissenior is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.