Apollo Proof - explain this!

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by st jimmy

There you go again!!!
Not understanding what I wrote...

Fuck my old boots Jimmy, you and making sense are not great pardners You talk so much bollocks it's rare you break through to even reasonable

If these videos were so damn important, they would have saved the lot on the moon and took the tapes back to earth!

THE WHOLE POINT....DUHHHHH!!! They weren't important and it was ONLY APOLLO 11. They had all the tapes in other formats.

Of course it's much easier to do special effects when the visual quality is much lower.

What a load of shit. It was a fixed camera with hardly any activity. Show the speshul effex

But the transmission argument is just as ridiculous as just about all the gibberish you post...

What transmission argument? Every single minute was transmitted and apart from Apollo 11 which had to be converted seconds before transmission, EVERY transmission was broadcast live.

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/Apo...pes_Report.pdf

"In the triumph of the day, no one at the tracking stations considered these differences and certainly the public was unaware. The engineers boxed the one-inch telemetry tapes wound onto 14-inch canister reels-which served no other purpose than to provide backup if the live relay failed-and shipped them to the Goddard Space Flight Center. From there, the tapes were sent to the Washington National Records Center (WRNC) in Suitland, Md."

Can you read? EXACTLY as I said.

Note to all people reading this thread. Not ONE of these pathetic HBs has responded to a single thing posted in the OP or either of the follow ups. Even the follow up points to their off topic shite are being ignored.

We went, landed 6 times. The evidence says so and not one of these people has the balls to debate the evidence provided. NOT ONE!

[billybleach]

So, what about this new radiation belt that was discovered in 2013?

https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/201...bes_Belts.html

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by billybleach

So, what about this new radiation belt that was discovered in 2013?

https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/201...bes_Belts.html

Yeah Biily...come on what about it. They went around on a wide 30 degree trajectory through the weaker areas.

[size_of_light]

I've got no idea what the real.deal is with the Moon landings, never have.

Is it possible there's a combination of real footage (whether on the Moon or in some different gravity environment) and also faked terrestrial footage?

They do like to fuck with the public mind for a multitude of reasons, so it wouldn't surprise me.

Truegroup, is there anything at all about the Apollo missions you personally find dubious or suspicious, or do you find the official NASA story 100% reliable and trustworthy?

I've only looked at the first vid in the OP and am wondering if all those calculations are dependant on the soil type to reach an accurate conclusion.

Could a wind machine (hell, I dunno, even fake metallic soil particles and a powerful off-screen magnet) theoretically account for the allegedly impossible terrestrial speed of the kicked up dirt?

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by size_of_light

Is it possible there's a combination of real footage (whether on the Moon or in some different gravity environment) and also faked terrestrial footage?

Not really.

Truegroup, is there anything at all about the Apollo missions you personally find dubious or suspicious, or do you find the official NASA story 100% reliable and trustworthy?

Not one thing is iffy. I struggle to understand how anyone could think such a massive and totally consistent thing could be faked.

There are enough crazy hoax threads on this forum.....this isn't one of them. I want the explanations for my evidence....as I always give for the hoax crap.

I've only looked at the first vid in the OP and am wondering if all those calculations are dependant on the soil type to reach an accurate conclusion.

Nope.

Could a wind machine (hell, I dunno, even fake metallic soil particles and a powerful off-screen magnet) theoretically account for the allegedly impossible terrestrial speed of the kicked up dirt?

Kind of desperate and unfeasible. No, I can't even imagine why let alone how. I mean 6 missions each one longer and more evidence than the last?

Watch them all. None explainable except that they are on the Moon. I can provide untold examples more of this. Not one person has explained any of it.

[size_of_light]

OK. Thanks.

[JumpRogue]

TG

Is the majority of your info from NASA?

[bamboozooka]

truegroup watching the new china footage

[thermion]

Originally Posted by JumpRogue

TG

Is the majority of your info from NASA?

May I step in here?

A number of radio amateurs received and tracked the Apollo radio signals. They came from expected regions in the sky, with appropriate path loss, Doppler shift and polarisation. One of these groups was Kettering Grammar School in December 1972.

This specific radio technology is not appreciated by the general public, and presumably completely unknown to Apollo conspiracy nuts. But just becasue something is difficult to understand does not mean it's fabricated.

Unfortunately those who believe the Apollo missions were faked don't bother to unpick this data. It's just dismissed (if it's acknowledged at all) with a wave of the arm.

thermion.

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by JumpRogue

TG

Is the majority of your info from NASA?

Don't play that "dodgy source" card.

Let's assume the bullshit. NASA are evil and lie all the time. Here is their evidence about the Moon landing.....debunk it!

And THAT is the bottom line. They have given every scrap of evidence and it all stacks up. Just click that link in my signature for unbelievable consistency over the whole program.

This isn't a magic trick.....it's hard evidence and the hoax claimants should be able to easily explain the OP videos. They can't even come close, nobody has even tried.

Yet every single daft hoax claim has the arse torn out of it.

I haven't even started on the rocks, examined by thousands of non NASA geologists around the world. It comes from off world, low gravity, not meteorites, bone dry and verified as fully consistent with what is claimed.

[berten60]

And now they landed on the other side:



Come on,hoaxtards! Debunk it !!

[JumpRogue]

TG

I just asked a simple question.

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by JumpRogue

TG

I just asked a simple question.

No is the answer. Your implication was what I responded to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-..._Moon_landings

There's lots of stuff not in that list.

[JumpRogue]

Originally Posted by truegroup

No is the answer.

Thankyou for your answer TG.

[decim]

37 seconds of CGI.
Next!

Originally Posted by berten60

And now they landed on the other side:



Come on,hoaxtards! Debunk it !!

[oz93666]

Originally Posted by thermion

...the Apollo radio signals. They came from expected regions in the sky...Kettering Grammar School ....

The implication is school kids wouldn't be in on a conspiracy ... no but they're easy to fool all they know is they have the end of a wire , and believe it goes into their antenna on the roof ... very easy to feed in a signal from a recorder , get the press in and make a big publicity stunt out of it ...

http://

Originally Posted by berten60

And now they landed on the other side:
Come on,hoaxtards! Debunk it !!

With such scant information available we have no proof one way or the other .
Apollo on the other hand we have Mountains of information and it's been proven a fake in 100 different times for a 100 different reasons ...

With modern tech there is no great difficulty in landing an unmanned probe on the moon , I would bet it's genuine, but we just don't have enough information to know with any certainty.

But this whole Apollo issue has become a waste of space .... 50 years ago this happened ... Those who haven't got the technical acumen to see it's fake will still be hashing it over in 50 years time ... the cutting edge is now SSP information.

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by oz93666

The implication is school kids wouldn't be in on a conspiracy ... no but they're easy to fool all they know is they have the end of a wire , and believe it goes into their antenna on the roof ... very easy to feed in a signal from a recorder , get the press in and make a big publicity stunt out of it …

You have been asked to address the FUCKING videos in the OP, not very minor stuff like this!!! So, to make this work, we now have NASA coming over to Britain with some random bloke clipping in a feed wire to their antennae because they had to have told them in advance?? that they were going to do this??

Are you for real? Do you seriously think they did this just in case??

Try not to litter this thread with a video from that rather stupid individual from youtube "hunchbacked". This bloke has the understanding of a turnip. He's like the equivalent of firing an Uzi into a saucepan full of fish.

YOUR ENTIRE JODRELL BANK VIDEO DEBUNKED from just one comment! - "You imbecile, they WERE NOT using radar, they were tuned to the frequency of the LEM's AUDIO carrier, what a TOTAL fool you just made of yourself!"

With such scant information available we have no proof one way or the other .

Oh fuck off. There isn't scant information, there is documentation that could fill a thousand bibles!

Apollo on the other hand we have Mountains of information and it's been proven a fake in 100 different times for a 100 different reasons

Debunk the videos in the OP!!! Not one single piece of the idiotic hoax proof stands up to scrutiny. NOT ONE.

But this whole Apollo issue has become a waste of space .... 50 years ago this happened ... Those who haven't got the technical acumen to see it's fake will still be hashing it over in 50 years time ... the cutting edge is now SSP information

You don't have any technical acumen, you are a big coward who runs away from debate time and time again. You don't have the balls to even respond to the opening post!! You have not the slightest clue about the depth of the lunar missions and how every single piece of the puzzle fits together with such complete and infallible consistency.

[don coyote]

I love the Hoaxers and Deniers. If there had only been ONE mission to the moon, ... I might be a denier, myself. I love how the deniers think that we had HD Video Cameras and one terabyte memory cards back then, and can't fathom the "Poor Resolution" of the era's technology. People believe that we faked the Lunar Missions..... but they BELIEVE in BIGFOOT???!!!

I love the Hoaxers and Deniers. They are so very entertaining.

[truegroup]

Any takers on this? I mean surely you HBs have some bloody explanation for this, that doesn't rely on gibberish, bullshit or diversion.

HELLOOOOOOOO??????

[hokuspokus]

Originally Posted by truegroup

Any takers on this? I mean surely you HBs have some bloody explanation for this, that doesn't rely on gibberish, bullshit or diversion.

HELLOOOOOOOO??????

Thanks for this . It is a great help. Again. Thanks.