Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 30-08-2018, 04:48 PM   #21
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Chickenpox vaccines causes shingles epidemic

I think I almost get it now...
Dr. Goldman concluded on the approval of chickenpox vaccines:
Quote:
... a combination of financial conflicts of interests, lack of proper controls, and poor methodology in varicella studies commissioned by the CDC often yielded improper or confounded results and conclusions— producing research based on pseudoscience that should more appropriately be relegated to a faith-based belief system rather than the realm of science.
A couple of days ago, it was reported that 18 people have filed a lawsuit against Merck, because allegedly its Zostavax shingles vaccine causes shingles: “Merck knew or should have known that its product caused viral infection and was therefore not safe”.

At least 80 deaths associated with the Zostavax vaccine were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), along with over 100,000 reports of other adverse side effects. Only a portion of all adverse effects are reported in VAERS.

According to Dr. Robert Scott Bell the vaccine fails because: “it’s not facilitating natural antibody production”.
Bell thinks: “on some level, it’s by design” and vaccines are one of many medical weapons of the “disease creation machinery”: https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-08-...e-injury.html#

Once again Naturalnews.com leaves out the best information…


Natural chickenpox (varicella) infection in most children (99.9% of healthy children) is a mild disease and results in long-lasting immunity.
In 1995, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved Merck's chickenpox vaccine Varivax. The varicella vaccine’s protection is only temporary, leaving vaccinated individuals vulnerable to infection at an older age when chickenpox is more serious.
In 2000, the CDC reported that between March 1995 and July 1998, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) had received 67.5 adverse event reports per 100,000 doses (1 in 1,481), including bacterial infections (cellulites), transverse myelitis, Guillain Barre syndrome and herpes zoster (shingles).

Gary S. Goldman, served from 1995 until his resignation in 2002 as a researcher for the Varicella Active Surveillance Project in a cooperative project with the CDC. Goldman resigned after he was prevented from publishing his findings about the expected negative impacts of massive vaccination of children with the varicella zoster vaccines.
Goldman predicted that widespread chickenpox vaccination would lead to a loss of natural immunity and a spike create a shingles epidemic among adults and warned of a "50-year shingles epidemic":
Quote:
the universal varicella vaccination program in the United States...will leave our population vulnerable to shingles epidemics...there appears to be no way to avoid a mass epidemic of shingles lasting as long as several generations among adults.
Goldman thought that a shingles vaccine “would likely fail because adult vaccination programs have rarely proved successful”.

Chickenpox and herpes zoster (HZ, or shingles) are caused by closely related viruses. Shingles used to relatively rare. Shingles is painful, and can be very serious.
So by vaccination, in exchange for avoiding the relatively mild “one week nuisance” of chickenpox as a kid, big pharma has created a new, more dangerous atypical adult form of the illness, and an epidemic of shingles.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Merck's shingles vaccine, Zostavax, to poison people aged 60 and older in 2006 to fix the problem caused by Merck's chickenpox vaccine Varivax, but reportedly "duration of protection after vaccination with Zostavax is unknown".

Big pharma sells their products by what I sometimes refer to as statistrics. The “new” shingles vaccine Zostavax was once heralded as decreasing the rate of shingles with 50%. To gullible fools this sounds impressive.
This really means that the occurrence of shingles went down from 3.3% to 1.7% in the trial. You could just as well label this (50%) as a decrease of a mere 1.6% or conclude that 63 vaccinations are required to prevent a single infection. This sounds a lot less impressive, especially when you consider that every vaccine has adverse effects or that the remaining infections could be worse than the disease without vaccine!
Without specific information on the trial this doesn’t even “prove” that 63 vaccinations on average would prevent 1 shingles infection. The reported decrease from 3.3% to 1.7% in the trial was for age 60; the claimed efficacy falls to only 18% for age 80 and above (for example from 3.3% to 2.7%).
Vaccine manufacturers even admit that the “protection” of the vaccine wanes in time (so we need additional “booster” shots): http://www.mountainrunnerdoc.com/the...-epidemic.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/9NhQS)


I’ve found a 2013 scientific looking report with Goldman as an author.

In 2000, the vaccination campaign had decreased the varicella incidence dramatically to 28% of the pre-vaccine rate - from 2834 in 1995 to 836 in 2000. By 2002, the varicella vaccination efficacy fell below 80%.
From 2000 to 2001, HZ (shingles) incidence significantly increased among adults aged 20–69 years. Children that were previously infected with varicella demonstrated (high) HZ rates similar to adults. The CDC still claimed that no increase in HZ had occurred in any US surveillance site.
From 2000 to 2001, Goldman noted that the number of HZ case reports had maintained or increased in every adult age category except adults aged 70 years and older. The increase in HZ cases for ages 20–69 from 158 in 2000 to 203 in 2001 (a 28.5% increase) is statistically significant.
The light grey bars are hard to see…


From January 2000 - April 2002 (2 years and 4 months) the recurrent HZ incidence rate (a second infection after an earlier infection) was 2440/100,000 p-y. This is 3.3 times as high as the 744/100,000 p-y reported before varicella vaccination was approved.

Yih et al. reported and 22.5% annual increase from 1999 to 2003 in Massachusetts.
The AV-VASP reported an increase of 28% from 2006 to 2007 among adults aged 50 years and older and even a 38% increase in HZ incidence among adults aged 50–59 years.
From 2000 to 2006, the HZ incidence in age group 10–19 approximately doubled.


After Goldman resigned because he wasn’t allowed to publish his findings on the relationship between the chickenpox vaccination and the shingles “epidemic”, Dr. Laurene Mascola of the ACDC Unit of LADHS demanded that he wouldn’t publish his report. After Goldman hired attorneys the county dropped its opposition to publication in a medical journal.
Goldman’s main conclusions are:
Quote:
• The high recurrent HZ incidence rate of 2440/100,000 p-y relative to the 744/100,000 p-y reported by Donahue et al. [6].
• The high HZ incidence rate among children under 10 years of age with a prior history of natural varicella of 307/100,000 p-y during 2000–2001 [3] and 446/100,000 p-y during 2000–2003 [4]—higher than any other historical rates.
• The 18% overall increase in adult HZ from 2000 to 2001; case counts maintained or increased in every age category except elderly adults 70+ years (Fig. 1); the 28.5% increase in HZ reports among adults 20–59 years was statistically significant (p < 0.042).
• The 56% increase in HZ case reports among adults 20 years of age and older from 236 in 2000 to 368 in 2002 [39].
• Baseline prevaccine cumulative 1987–1995 true HZ incidence rate of 145/100,000 p-y among children under 10 years of age [31].
In 2006, 20% of children that had been vaccinated were infected with varicella and so the CDC recommended a booster shot for children (for every health problem, the "solution" is another shot...). The CDC ignored the assumptions that had justified the initial approval of the vaccine of life-long “immunity”.
In 2007, the HZ (shingles) vaccine Merck's Zostavax was approved for adults aged 60 and older.
In 2011, the FDA approved Zostavax for adults aged 50 and older.

Zostavax was approved based on a study (was an inert placebo used?) that showed an HZ incidence rate of 5.42 cases/1000 p-y in the vaccinated group compared to 11.12 cases/1000 p-y for the placebo group.
That would probably be called a 50% efficacy…
Because the vaccine “protection” wanes efficacy is lower.

Eliminating varicella (chickenpox) in the US (280 million) would prevent approximately 186 million cases of varicella and 5,000 deaths over 50 years.
Goldman’s model predicts that varicella vaccination would generate an extra 21 million cases of herpes zoster resulting in 5,000 deaths.
Patel et al. report that the net hospitalization costs for complications of HZ have increased by more than $700 million per year by 2004 for adults 60 years and older.
HZ morbidity costs exceed the cost savings from the reported varicella-disease reductions.

G.S. Goldman and P.G. King – Review of the United States universal varicella vaccination program: Herpes zoster incidence rates, …” (2013): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759842/


Based on Goldman’s report, I conclude that possibly the increase in shingles cases was (is) caused by another factor than the chickenpox vaccine...
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278

Last edited by st jimmy; 30-08-2018 at 04:48 PM.
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 05:20 PM   #22
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default More on shingles (vaccine)

I’ve looked for more information on shingles, and while the official story is that shingles (HZ: herpes zoster) rates are increasing worldwide - I’m not sure.
It’s easy to either underreport or overreport the number of shingles cases. The shingles scare could be nothing but fear mongering to get us all to take the shingles vaccine.
Isn’t it strange that the state propaganda claims that it is unknown what causes the reported huge increase in shingles, but provides a vaccine anyway? How could they know that a vaccine would make things better if they don’t even know what causes the increase in shingles rates?

Even the cause of shingles is something of a mystery.
It’s impossible to get shingles if you’ve never had chickenpox.
The strange explanation is that the virus that first causes chickenpox remains “dormant” in the body and then years later supposedly causes shingles.
It’s possible to get shingles more than once, so obviously it’s different than (other) viral diseases, where that you can’t get more than once. How could a vaccine work if our immune system isn’t able to make us immune?


According to the following scientific looking report from the period 1945 – 1949 to 2000 to 2007, the shingle rate climbed from 0.76 people per 1,000 to 3.15 per 1,000 (a 4-fold increase in 55 years).
Increases in the HZ rates have been reported in the US, UK, Canada, Australia, Spain, Japan, and Taiwan. The majority of prior studies are limited to the last 2 decades with relatively short study periods of 5–10 years. Most studies rely on administrative data without medical records for confirmation.


The complete increase couldn’t be caused by varicella vaccines alone, as the rise had already started before these vaccines were introduced.
It’s also unlikely that antiviral therapy, or change in amount of immunodeficient people could be THE cause. It’s certainly possible that any of these factors played a role in the huge increase in shingles rates.

Studies from Poland, Japan, Taiwan, and Australia reported that incidence of HZ is higher in the summer; however other studies reported no seasonal difference.
The cause of the increase of shingles remains unknown.

This study that doesn’t find a link between the chickenpox vaccine and the rise in shingles is really, really “independent”; supported by Merck, the CDC and the Rochester Epidemiology Project (that is supported by the NIH).

K. Kawai et al. – Increasing Incidence of Herpes Zoster Over a 60-year Period From a Population-based Study (2016): https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/63/2/221/1745553
(archived here: http://archive.is/0xlKZ)


After introduction of the chickenpox vaccine, from 1997/98 to 2013/14, HZ incidence in Canada increased by 49.5%.
A portion of this increase is related to demographic changes in age. Older people supposedly have a higher shingles rate. After correcting for age, there remained a significant 21% increase in HZ (compared to 49.5% not corrected for age).

The huge increase in the crude incidence of HZ, began to rise sharper from July 2009 (after introduction of the (first) shingles vaccine in 2009).
Chickenpox vaccinations were only added to the Canadian routine childhood vaccination schedule in 2004.


The costs of the increase of HZ, has been compensated by dramatic drops in hospitalisation rates, holding the total costs for HZ treatment relatively constant.

This study that disagreed that the chickenpox vaccine has caused an increase in shingles incidence was also very “independently” financed by Merck Canada.

K.J. Friesen et al. – Cost of shingles: population based burden of disease analysis of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (2017): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5237245/


The following shows that Australia HZ notification rates are on the rise (not hospitalisation): https://www.phaa.net.au/documents/item/2281


By now the “first” shingles vaccine Zostavax (of Merck) with a reported decrease in shingles of 51%, isn’t recommended anymore.
Since 2017, the CDC recommends the Shingrix shingles vaccine (of GlaxoSmithKline) for ages 50 and older that supposedly is 90% effective in preventing shingles. The study was funded and performed by a team with many, many ties to big pharma (including GlaxoSmithKline) and funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

Herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) was “confirmed” in only 6 in the vaccine group but 210 participants in the placebo group.

The placebo consisted of a 0.9% saline solution. That sounds good to me...
Unsolicited symptoms within 7 days after vaccination were reported in 84.4% of participants in the vaccine and 37.8% in the placebo group.
Within the first 30 days after vaccination, 231 serious adverse events were reported in 87 of 7698 vaccine recipients (1.1%) and 97 of 7713 placebo recipients (1.3%).

How come an inert placebo causes “symptoms” in 37.8% and serious adverse events in 1.3% of the people injected with it: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1501184


408 subjects reported suspicion of HZ: 78 on the vaccine and 330 on placebo. This sounds a lot less impressive than 90%.
After careful “study”, they excluded 164 non-HZ-cases; after which 244 HZ-cases were confirmed.
6 in the 7698 vaccine group (0.1%) and 210 in the 7713 placebo group (2.7%).

This doesn’t add up...
216 is NOT 244 cases!
72 of the 78 suspicion cases in the vaccine group (92%) were excluded.
120 of the 330 suspicion cases in the placebo group (36%) were excluded.
At the start there were just as many in the placebo as in the vaccine group. Why did more from the vaccine group drop out?

Unfortunately the report doesn’t explain these discrepancies.

I don’t see a noticeable difference in death rate between the 2 groups: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.10...4_appendix.pdf
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-09-2018, 03:14 PM   #23
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Not reporting negative results

This year, a group led by psychiatrist Goldacre reported that medical trials often violate EU legal requirements for reporting within a year after completion. In the US and the EU, certain categories of trials have to be reported within 1 year of completion by law.

Of 7274 trials where results were due, only 49.5% reported results in time. While only 68% of company-sponsored trials reporting their results, universities reported only 11%.

Of the 31,818 trials investigated, the study excluded 20,287 and 3392 trials because their status was never reported as completed. It is likely that many of these trials with “missing dates” (inconsistent data) also failed to report results within time.

Ben Goldacre et al. – Compliance with requirement to report results on the EU Clinical Trials Register: cohort study and web resource (2018): https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3218

The following site managed by Goldacre gives more details on which companies and universities don’t report in time. Note the huge amount of universities that never report in time (0%).
Also note the huge amount of studies with inconsistent data: http://eu.trialstracker.net/


After Goldacre’s report, the Telegraph reported about 3 vaccine trials conducted by/for Public Health England (PHE) for which the results have never been published (according to the EU Clinical Trials Register). This is in violation with EU law that requires publication within one year.
The EUCRT was set up after people found out that big pharma simply didn’t publish negative results on their drugs.

The largest trial involved a new meningococcal and whooping cough booster vaccine with 640 children under the age of 16; concluded in 2016.
The second PHE trial was concluded in 2010, investigated effectiveness of a meningitis C vaccine in a group of 130 one-year-olds.
The third, concluded in 2011, involved 75 adults getting a meningitis B vaccine.

Experts accused PHE of an “incomprehensible” violation of the trust of parents who gave their consent for their children participating in the tests.
Ben Goldacre said:
Quote:
It is incomprehensible to me that Public Health England of all the trials it could leave unreported to have failed to comply with the legal requirements to report trials of vaccines.
When patients participate and they take a risk with their own health. We have to respect their contribution by publishing the results properly. If we don’t, that is a betrayal of trust.
Withholding the results of a clinical trial makes a mockery of all our efforts to promote trust in medicine, and i’m particularly sad to see vaccine trials going unreported.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ng-impossible/


The following report suggests that only studies that show that the drugs of big pharma have no efficacy aren’t published.
Erick H. Turner et al. – Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy (2008): https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...0&postcount=97
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (2)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2018, 08:00 AM   #24
oz93666
Senior Member
 
oz93666's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK citizen living in Thailand jungle
Posts: 7,898
Likes: 3,847 (2,105 Posts)
Default This on DI Headlines today ....



"Coinciding with the ever-increasing vaccine schedule are soaring rates of chronic illness in children, including cancer, which has skyrocketed and is now the leading cause of death by disease in children past infancy.

Government authorities refuse to acknowledge any link between cancer and vaccination, but could injecting toxic chemicals repeatedly into our children, especially at critical intervals in their development be causing cancer in so many?' "


Dahh.... you think there might be a link ???

AJ put this to bed 18 years ago ...I remember listening to all the insiders and whistleblowers he interviewed , here's the bottom line....

99% of all autism spectrum is caused by thimerosal in vaccines everyone has had their IQ reduced by this , autism is just an extreme reaction (now 1 in 60)

95% of all cancer is caused by agents in the vaccines ...cancer virus is normally used which lays dormant in the body and only activates when hormone levels change around age 45 , this way the victim has usually earned enough wealth which then goes to big pharma in health care .... they may have recently adjusted this strategy and started targeting children more ...people in the west have a 50% chance of being diagnosed with cancer some time in their lives ...

Of course this is all intentional ... to reduce IQ of everyone ...wrek society and burden us with an astronomical health care bill

Last edited by oz93666; 03-10-2018 at 08:03 AM.
Likes: (1)
oz93666 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 10:22 AM   #25
bamboozooka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 639
Likes: 466 (271 Posts)
Default

theoretical situation: parents have the whole family booked in for the latest round of flu jabs. being told their kids need it as their immune system is weaker than normal.
they honestly believe they are doing the best for their kids, so how do you red pill them without causing offence of suggesting they put their kids lives at risk?
i'm lost.
Likes: (1)
bamboozooka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 04:16 PM   #26
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamboozooka View Post
they honestly believe they are doing the best for their kids, so how do you red pill them without causing offence of suggesting they put their kids lives at risk?
i'm lost.
Refusing vaccines can get your kids thrown out of public school and can make a doctor refuse you as a patient.

It is even worse, refusing vaccines, will quickly give you a bad grade on the obedience rating, and then it will be claimed that you're a "bad parent".
Being a "bad parent" could make the "child protection" service steal your kids...

I'm afraid I'm not exaggerating!
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (2)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 04:17 PM   #27
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,312
Likes: 13,114 (7,523 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Refusing vaccines can get your kids thrown out of public school and can make a doctor refuse you as a patient.

It is even worse, refusing vaccines, will quickly give you a bad grade on the obedience rating, and then it will be claimed that you're a "bad parent".
Being a "bad parent" could make the "child protection" service steal your kids...

I'm afraid I'm not exaggerating!
that's why we need MASS non cooperation

if millions of people do it then what are they going to do?
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 04:29 PM   #28
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
that's why we need MASS non cooperation

if millions of people do it then what are they going to do?
The combination of computer technology, wireless communication and sheeple walking around with their cool mobile phones, has led to the situation that Big Brother knows everything.

Combining the information on several computer systems and data mining techniques make it possible to brainwash us all: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...=312796&page=3

Maybe you think that you’re “immune” to conditioning, but they have your profile figured out, and you will turn out to be fooled into supporting the (right wing) “conspiracy” politicians that they want to win elections: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1063044595

But maybe I'm too negative as it only needs a few million of people to brake the chains of slavery.
I don't believe that vaccines are a tool for mind control though!
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 04:41 PM   #29
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,312
Likes: 13,114 (7,523 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Maybe you think that you’re “immune” to conditioning, but they have your profile figured out, and you will turn out to be fooled into supporting the (right wing) “conspiracy” politicians that they want to win elections: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1063044595
i don't have a smart phone

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
I don't believe that vaccines are a tool for mind control though!
no they are a delivery system for health destroying substances for example aluminium which when injected into muscle is swallowed by macrophages that then carry it across the blood brain barrier where it is then able to affect gene function in 'non specific ways'
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2018, 07:53 PM   #30
bamboozooka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 639
Likes: 466 (271 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Refusing vaccines can get your kids thrown out of public school and can make a doctor refuse you as a patient.

It is even worse, refusing vaccines, will quickly give you a bad grade on the obedience rating, and then it will be claimed that you're a "bad parent".
Being a "bad parent" could make the "child protection" service steal your kids...

I'm afraid I'm not exaggerating!
thats right but the flu jab is not compulsory.
they are now pushing the hpv jab on boys with the only reason for it to prevent genital warts. and they will use gillicks law to bypass the parental consent form. so we will see nurses bullying and scaring kids into having it parental consent or not.
Likes: (2)
bamboozooka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-10-2018, 04:55 PM   #31
techman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,008
Likes: 1,114 (614 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz93666 View Post


"Coinciding with the ever-increasing vaccine schedule are soaring rates of chronic illness in children, including cancer, which has skyrocketed and is now the leading cause of death by disease in children past infancy.

Government authorities refuse to acknowledge any link between cancer and vaccination, but could injecting toxic chemicals repeatedly into our children, especially at critical intervals in their development be causing cancer in so many?' "


Dahh.... you think there might be a link ???

AJ put this to bed 18 years ago ...I remember listening to all the insiders and whistleblowers he interviewed , here's the bottom line....

99% of all autism spectrum is caused by thimerosal in vaccines everyone has had their IQ reduced by this , autism is just an extreme reaction (now 1 in 60)

95% of all cancer is caused by agents in the vaccines ...cancer virus is normally used which lays dormant in the body and only activates when hormone levels change around age 45 , this way the victim has usually earned enough wealth which then goes to big pharma in health care .... they may have recently adjusted this strategy and started targeting children more ...people in the west have a 50% chance of being diagnosed with cancer some time in their lives ...

Of course this is all intentional ... to reduce IQ of everyone ...wrek society and burden us with an astronomical health care bill
Vaccines and cancer connection? possibly, but try telling people this especially those suffering from it that this could be the cause; you'll hear the usual reaction "that's rubbish, my doctor would know if it were true", and so on.

How the hell do you convince or even pursuade people to do their own research and look into these alternative research studies instead of them stuck in this "my doctor/the hospital would know about this if it were true" way of thinking instead of swallowing they're told.

It does make me wonder why we are getting children now with cancer, yet noone seems to bud a eye lid and wonder what's the cause, well I suppose they do get told what THEY want them to think is the cause, but not the real cause. Cancer charities are there as official gatekeepers to keep the public from thinking out of the box, yet most people don't realise there's lots of independent researchers who are trying to expose what's going on. You'll never hear McMillan et al discussing this, as if theyve got any clue anyway.

Despite research into autism and vaccines (though officially not endorsed), parents are still falling over themselves to get their child vaccinated, particularly at this time of year.

Last edited by techman; 19-10-2018 at 05:14 PM.
Likes: (2)
techman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2018, 04:25 PM   #32
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Mikovits – retroviruses in vaccines

This could be THE single most shocking “medical” story that I’ve heard about this year...

Molecular biologist Judy Anne Mikovits was part of a scientific team that discovered xenotropic murine leukemia virus (XMRV) in many of the study subjects with cancer, motor-neuron disorders and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
In 2009, the team published this study, which understandably got very controversial. The team concluded that the XMRV retrovirus came from mice. This was probably caused by contaminated vaccines.

In October 2011, Mikovits was fired was subsequently arrested on 18 November, because she wouldn’t admit that her 2009 paper was a fraud for manipulation of data and theft (of her own notebooks).
The criminal charges against her were dismissed.

The paper was retracted 23 December 2011, with the excuse that the mouse retroviruses they found weren’t in the human blood, but were contaminants (which is unlikely): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judy_Mikovits


Following is a transcript of an interview of Judy Mikovits by Wendy Myers.

They found retroviruses, similar to HIV, in patients with chronic fatigue Syndrome, which must have come in their bloodstream by vaccines.
A lot of diseases are caused by these mouse retroviruses, including AIDS and cancer.
Quote:
In 2009, we published a paper showing retroviruses, viruses similar to HIV, were being isolated. We isolated them from patients with the disease also from their family members, also from people with cancer and autism.
And so these retroviruses now, HIV/AIDS-like viruses, are causing even worse than HIV/AIDS. They're causing these diseases which destroy your immune system and your brain, and the worst part about it is you don't die. You simply suffer for decades with no brain, in horrible pain, can't sleep, can't think, can't work. And the government had basically been calling these people crazy, because you look fine. You look pretty like you and me sitting here. And everybody says, "Oh, she can't be sick.”
(...)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. So we wrote the book Plague. Kent Heckenlively is a former attorney, and he had an injured daughter, a severely vaccineinjured daughter, in one of our family studies isolating these HIV/AIDSlike viruses. Well, my colleagues from HIV and the National Cancer Institute were all working with us at the Whittemore Peterson Institute, and they were finding a much bigger incidence of these viruses. And they're mouse viruses, so they're related to mice. They're mice endogenous retroviruses that have jumped into people, and that's how they cause disease. The HIV-like virus came from monkeys into people.
And one of my colleagues from HIV wrote a paper in January of 2011 and said, "The most likely way that mouse viruses got into human is vaccines and biological therapies." All of our biological therapies essentially since the early '90s or mid '80s are biological therapies that now we understood from my work and from his commentary paper were most likely entering humans from not only vaccines but our biological cancer therapies, because they're all made in mice.
(...)

So chronic fatigue syndrome is really a big closet disease. It's a shameful stigma name because in America, you can't be tired. And they do the same thing, blame the victim, and just say you're crazy, and oh, suck it up and get up and go work. And when these devastating viruses hit your brain, you're literally destroyed. So what our book does is walk through my arrest, my jailing. So it opens with my arrest. And so I get held in jail for five days without seeing a lawyer, with all of my constitutional-

On a fake charge without a warrant, without anything. I was called a fugitive from justice, but you can be a fugitive if there's no crime.
(…)

The truth is essentially every vaccine is contaminated and/or they're making them out of backbones of retroviruses. And the sad truth is that the retroviruses stay in your genome for generations, and the murine leukemia, the gammaretroviruses from mice, can infect stem cells. So generations, grandma can have MECFS, and child can get it from grandma, inherit the sequence, and then the vaccines amplify it because there are many, many more viruses in there. Because the retroviruses, you don't have to have the particle, you just have the sequence. So anywhere there is animal cell line or cellular material, the sequence is only 8000 base pairs. It's called a provirus. And the provirus needs your cells in order to make a particle and be infectious and transmissible, and that's a really important part. But we're injuring literally thousands, tens of thousands, millions of base pairs of DNA in every single vaccine containing cow retroviruses, mouse retroviruses, pig retroviruses. And in fact, if you look at the CDC excipient list for the RotaTeq, the RotaTeq vaccine. They list two pig retroviruses in there, and they say, "Oh, but they don't do anything to humans." By definition, if you inject an animal retrovirus in a human, and it is expressed, it will hurt you.
(...)

Well, it's interesting, because we all have retroviruses that are immune system has crippled. They're called endogenous retroviruses, so they're not infectious and transmissible. And so meaning they're just silenced, and your immune system has kept them silent. And you have to keep them silent. So really it becomes a big conundrum. You don't want to test and say, "Do I have a retrovirus?" We know that you have lots of retroviruses, and there are pieces and parts and components of those retroviruses in every vaccine. And what we've learned now is you don't have to have an infectious retrovirus, just the components, just the pieces and parts, just the envelope gene, and the glyphosate in vaccines, or the mercury, or the aluminum that actually cripple the parts of the immune system that keep them silent. So it's literally a time bomb because we all have retroviruses, but mine are silent. Mine aren't turned on, because I'm 60 years old, and most 60-year-olds only got two vaccines. So it's not just a vaccine, it's the shear numbers of these things. And it's not just the components and the retroviral elements in the vaccines, it's the mercury. Because every time you get one, it's like throwing gasoline on a fire. So the kids get sicker and sicker and sicker.

Mikovits also discovered that her superiors were committing fraud.
Quote:
Yes. And I also uncovered that my supervisors were misappropriating federal funds, and they were also selling al diagnostic test that hadn't been properly validated for the family of viruses. And so I discovered this huge criminal ring surrounding the University of Nevada, Harry Reid, Harvey Whittemore. And basically, they were using this discovery.
Harvey Whittemore had been embezzling money from his business partners, and they caught him. And they were threatening to kill him

And he had lied to the FBI about a election fraud with regard to Harry Reid, so Harry Reid wasn't actually legally elected. And they were paying people basically to donate to his campaign. So lots of other things going on there. And I had discovered this. In late August and early September, I discovered the scientific fraud and the misappropriation of federal funds by actually the first author on our paper, who was basically taking the money out of the research lab and putting it in the company, which is a big, big no-no, and not doing his job. And he was being paid for it. And so they were taking our data and using it.

AIDS couldn’t have been caused by HIV.
Quote:
So the hope, and that's why we put the story in the book about Magic Johnson, because my PhD thesis, the dogma at the time I was doing my research, was that all our therapies in HIV were made towards the T-cell. And it was let yourself get sicker and sicker and don't use these dangerous drugs, because they're too dangerous, and they'll kill you.
Well, what my research showed we knew only one in 10,000 T-cells was infected. And I said something else is the orchestrator. So the orchestrator of the disease turned out to be the macrophage, the brain microglia, and what's the biggest damage from aluminum? The brain microglia, the macrophages all over your body. You have different microglia, different macrophage subsets that do different specialized things. Like fatty liver is our microglia in our liver, the Kupffer cells getting sick. And that's all the toxins, all the poisons, things like that.

I believe that there is only one way to keep ourselves mentally and physically healthy:
Good nutrition;
Keep away from toxics;
Regular exercise.
I don’t believe in wonder medicines, but in preventing disease instead, but Suramin is probably better that the AIDS drugs that are used these days.
Mikovits claims that Suramin is a cure for autism, but Bayern took it away from the kids.
Quote:
Well, as natural products. So you can use teas. You can use herbs. You can use 100-year old Bayer drug called suramin, S-U-R-A-M-I-N, and that drug is 100-year-old drug, and we know how to use it safely. And so an investigator, and I won't use his name, in San Diego, did a small clinical trial in autism with suramin used properly.
We used to do a lot of research in the early '80s. It was one of our first HIV drugs. We pulled everything off the shelf that made sense that might work. And so suramin actually was curative for autism. And Bayer, the drug company, took it away from the kids. You cannot get it. It can heal these kids like Kent Heckenlively's daughter who hasn't spoke a word and is desperately I'll. She looks like an AIDS patient, because that's what she is. And he can't get the drug. And so this just happened in the last year. So our book is revealing when you cure a disease, you know what caused it.

And so suramin was actually the reason why we didn't use it in HIV is what did it work best on? Oh, the gammaretroviruses from mice. The retroviruses that we found from mice. And so HIV is a different family of viruses, so the suramin drug worked best on the family of viruses we isolated and discovered associated with all of these diseases.
https://zl8r4yljp7281pio28kcrwnb-wpe...Transcript.pdf


This isn’t the first time that I hear that AIDS is caused by vaccines. It could very well be that repeatedly injecting retroviruses in the human body through vaccines could slowly but surely weaken your immune system.

According to Leonard Horrowitz, in 1978 promiscuous homosexuals in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco were injected with a hepatitis B vaccine through the Centers for Disease Control/New York Blood Center and George W. Merck’s pharmaceutical company.
This vaccine was really a “Trojan horse” that made these gay men develop what was called AIDS. According to Horrowitz this was done intentionally. It were these gay men that were the first AIDS cases that were reported in 1981...


The following interview with Judy Mikovits is a great summary of what she has to say (12:15).



Here’s a longer interview with Judy Mikovits (1:08:25): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmzWq6Ej6Os


Following is the retracted 2009 study.
Of the 101 test subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) that were analysed, 68 (67%) contained XMRV.
XMRV was only found in the blood of 8 out of 218 (3.7%) healthy people.
They verified that it was highly improbable that they had detected a laboratory contaminant.

The XMRV sequences were more than 99% similar to those previously reported for strains of XMRV in prostate cancer tumours.
The XMRV sequences were very similar to mouse strains.

After infecting T and B cells with XMRV, it was found that the cells of the CFS patients reacted differently to the XMRV than the (blood of) healthy individuals.
These results make it more probable that the immune response of the CFS patients to XMRV is different than for healthy people.

J.A. Mikovits et al. – Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2009): https://www.researchgate.net/publica...tigue_syndrome


Following is a later 2010 article in which Mikovits defends the earlier 2009 study.
They detected XMRV in more than 75% of 101 patients with CFS by 5 different methods.
It is simply not possible that the blood samples used were contaminated with mouse retroviruses as the WPI and NCI labs where the analysis with PCR was done had never worked with mouse tissues.

J.A. Mikovits et al. – Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2010): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073172/


In 2014, Mikovits co-authored, "Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" with Kent Heckenlively.
Following is an article written by Heckenlively to promote the book,

In 2012, a group headed by Ian Lipkin came to the conclusion that there is no association between XMRV and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
In a strange twist, they excluded patients with the following conditions: 1) HIV virus; 2) Hepatitis B or C virus; 3) Treponema pallidium (tapeworm); 4) B. burgdorfieri (Lyme disease spirochete); 5) Illness associated with fatigue; 6) Abnormal serum characteristics; 7; Abnormal thyroid functions.
There were no good objective reasons to exclude these “kind” of people. Micro-biologist Gerwyn Morris explained that this is like "looking for HIV, but excluding homosexual males, IV drug users, and those who'd received a blood transfusion". So they intentionally manipulated the study...

In 2013, Lipkin said in a public conference call with CDC that they found retroviruses in 85% of the sample pools but didn’t know whether this 85% is “clinically significant or not”.
This manipulated study was used to do no follow-up research on the findings of Mikovits and her team of scientists: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/pla...rica-must-read
(archived here: http://archive.is/WDsxv)


For more information on AIDS: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062841036
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (2)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2018, 05:22 PM   #33
cosmicpurpose1.618
Senior Member
 
cosmicpurpose1.618's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Everywhere/nowhere
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 2,010 (1,036 Posts)
Default

@stjimmy

What do you say to people who claim that human life-span was drastically less before vaccines were invented?

Do you think its true that people lived shorter lives before vaccines?

((PS, Its great to have you on the forum by the way. You're one of the few quality members left here.))
Likes: (1)
cosmicpurpose1.618 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2018, 04:09 PM   #34
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpurpose1.618 View Post
What do you say to people who claim that human life-span was drastically less before vaccines were invented?

Do you think its true that people lived shorter lives before vaccines?
That's an excellent question that I've sometimes asked myself.
I just don't know for sure.
It wouldn't be hard to manipulate statistics.
I doubt the reported average age of death of 80 in the Netherlands (where are all the old people?).

I DO believe that people in the "developed" world lived shorter than they do now...
I'm not sure about Africa though, as ages of death there are often reported as 50 or lower on average (mostly caused by nutrition).

If there is a longer life-span, I think this is mainly caused by better nutrition (obviously NOT better health care).
There could also be a huge effect of wars. Europe and North America, except former Yugoslavia, have been free of wars since 1945.

I guess that the life-span for the poor (starved) Yemenis is the lowest it has been for more than a century.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpurpose1.618 View Post
((PS, Its great to have you on the forum by the way. You're one of the few quality members left here.))
Thanks!!!
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278

Last edited by st jimmy; 21-10-2018 at 04:10 PM.
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2018, 11:07 AM   #35
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 1,399 (834 Posts)
Default

Flu vaccine hoax

The state media are again making us afraid for the coming flu epidemic, so we all behave like good citizens and get our flu vaccine...

Mark Geier worked 10 years at the National Institute of Health, was a professor at Johns Hopkins University as a geneticist, and was the author of over 150 peer-reviewed publications. Geier studied vaccine safety and efficacy for more than 30 years and is basically pro-vaccine, but against the flu vaccine.

In the following video, Geier explains that because they can only test “old” strains of the flu, they don’t know the efficacy of flu vaccines for the coming flu season. Therefore the flu vaccine is really an “experimental vaccine” that they want to inject into 300 million people every year in the US alone.

Because in medical trials they only report on adverse effects for 2 weeks, they really don’t know about long-term adverse effects.
There has never been a study to evaluate what happens when you give yearly flu vaccines. An 80-year-old getting flu shots every year would get 80 shots, probably this will cause cumulative damage that the single dose in a medical trial won’t show: https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/get-y...accine-in-u-s/



The study “Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?” by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates.
It concluded a 4250% increase in foetal deaths according to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data when comparing 3 consecutive influenza seasons.

A Rice University study predicted that this fall’s flu vaccine will likely have the same reduced efficacy as in 2016 and 2017 due to viral mutations related to vaccine production in eggs.
pEpitope has predicted that the efficacy will be only some 19” against the most common type of influenza A in the US, H3N2, in the past 2 years.

Hugh Fudenberg claims that if a person had 5 flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 he/she is 10 times more likely to get Alzheimer’s disease than with only 1 or 2 flu shots. According to Fudenberg this is caused by the aluminium and mercury in (almost) every flu vaccine: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/10...ine-myths.html
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthre...post1062977278
Likes: (1)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2018, 04:32 PM   #36
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Dude111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,223
Likes: 1,327 (862 Posts)
Default

A very good reply Jimmy thank you!!!!!!!!!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.