Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13-05-2009, 11:32 PM   #1
matrix911
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Flight 77 plane swap & duplicate flights 11 & 175?

Just when you think the rabbit hole can't go any deeper...

Were there two Flt 175 aircraft taking off at Logan International in Boston on 9-11 both with the tail numbers N612UA? Looks CONFIRMED to me.

Just Wow...

http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2008...om-boston.html
Quote:
My personal 9/11 researcher "career" started with the detection of a duplicated "Flight 11" at Boston Logan Airport: one departing from Terminal B, Gate 32, at 7:45, the other one from Terminal B, Gate 26, somewhat later because the departure was delayed:

http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2007...after-856.html
Quote:
would like to illuminate the fate of Flight 77 after it vanished from radar because it looks to me that many people don't know much about it, despite its importance.

At 8:56, the blip of Flight 77 vanished from the radar screens of Indianapolis Center, the responsible ATC facility, and at the same time radio communication was lost. This is a well known and well confirmed fact. Just take a look at the ATC transcript:

Oh and lest we not forget about the official report of UA93 being grounded at CLEVELAND for an alleged bomb threat while at the same time the official story claims it really crashed after passengers attempted to thwart the muslim hijackers.

so this just begins to scratch the surface regarding the question about what happened to the real planes and passengers.

http://web.archive.org/web/200211090...l/story14.html

Quote:
Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard

Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.

United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.

United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.

"United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.

http://www.911myths.com/html/93_land...cleveland.html
http://911debunker.livejournal.com/6311.html
http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2007...t-mystery.html
http://www.rense.com/general56/flfight.htm
http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=51
http://911review.org/inn.globalfreep...t_Mystery.html


Once again this is just more incredible evidence that all these anomalies and contradictions are not just coincidences and stinks to high heaven.

Last edited by matrix911; 13-05-2009 at 11:38 PM.
matrix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2009, 04:03 AM   #2
tabea_blumenschein
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The first of the six links at the bottom is well worth reading!

And just in case matrix911 edits it out of the opening post:

http://www.911myths.com/html/93_land...cleveland.html
__________________
De mortuis nil nisi bonum; of the living speak nothing but evil.

- Heinrich Heine
tabea_blumenschein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2009, 04:33 AM   #3
matrix911
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tabea_blumenschein View Post
The first of the six links at the bottom is well worth reading!

And just in case matrix911 edits it out of the opening post:

http://www.911myths.com/html/93_land...cleveland.html
LOL

another GL who doesn't seem to understand the reason for showing this material.

I KNOW it was RETRACTED which is WHY I put forth those links which contains that retraction.

The point is, the context shows the ABSURDITY of the retraction as to how long it took for LIZ et al to do it not to mention its merely another example of the DECEPTION, COVER-UP and DAMAGE CONTROL from all the MISTAKES that were made on 911 including this one where UNITED AIRLINES allegedly wasn't even able to keep track of their own flights!! ROFL. I don't buy it... something STINKS like all the rest of the anomalies on 911 that these OCT defenders so easily want to dismiss as nothing but another coincidence.

What a joke. and I thought my opponents would at least recognize I offered a link to review BOTH SIDES of the story... even though when one examines all the little details surrounding this "retraction", it wreaks of another "Damn, we forgot to get our story straight again, send out damage control" syndrome by the perps.

So again, whats interesting is how you ignore the context of all the thousands of "coincidences" and debacles that occurred on 911.

oh and how predictable you had no comment about the main topic of the thread title

Last edited by matrix911; 14-05-2009 at 04:45 AM.
matrix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.