Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19-10-2013, 09:02 PM   #1
fanof2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Huntingdon Valley, PA
Posts: 708
Likes: 57 (43 Posts)
Default Nuclear bombs or space-based death ray

Judy Wood says the WTC was taken down by a direct energy weapon, and according to UFO researcher John Lear in his 2008 interview on Project Camelot, the direct energy weapon that took out the WTC was on a space-based platform in Earth's orbit. However, some 9/11 researchers claim that the direct energy weapon was actually nuclear bombs planted in the WTC (which is technically a direct energy weapon since it works by having particles collide with an atom's nucleus and that is, by definition, a direct energy weapon.) This is supported by the article at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05...-nuked-on-911/

But could a direct energy weapon on a space-based platform produce the same effect as nuclear bombs planted in the building? Looks like 9/11 truth should spend some time looking to this to determine which type of direct energy weapon was used. Better get John Hutchinson on the phone for this one!
fanof2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-10-2013, 09:50 PM   #2
dave52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,141
Likes: 985 (411 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanof2012 View Post
could a direct energy weapon on a space-based platform produce the same effect as nuclear bombs planted in the building?
You have the question all round the wrong way.

Could Nuclear weapons create the effects that we saw on 9/11....?
__________________
Dave.

www.DaveWare.co.uk
Are You Listening...?
dave52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-10-2013, 09:32 AM   #3
sertes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 354
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

We see a lot of opinions from "experts"

We don't see a lot of "experts" explaining to us what they did so we can form our opinion indipendently

The things we can be sure:

1) The official theory is false, as a building cannot collapse both in free-fall and through the path of most resistance

2) The building didn't collapse from a single bomb in the basement, as the collapse proceeded from top to bottom
__________________
The measurements have indicated that Tower One collapsed in about 11 seconds, and Tower Two collapsed in about 9 seconds. (SHAYM SUNDER, NIST lead investigator)

Last edited by sertes; 20-10-2013 at 09:34 AM.
sertes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 06:25 PM   #4
profiler
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 92
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

How can you collapse a building of which 97% of mass is at the bottom from top down? Someone at clues forum already posted a puzzle regarding this phenomenon. I initially was like thinking they braced the towers, then "gutted" and compromised the bottom section to make it fall under a load from the top. Too much trouble compared to what happened. Possible perhaps, but not needed when you can just make a video and cover in smoke.
Where is your contention that at least some parts of the footage were real?
profiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 11:43 PM   #5
trixie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 68 (49 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanof2012 View Post
Judy Wood says the WTC was taken down by a direct energy weapon, and according to UFO researcher John Lear in his 2008 interview on Project Camelot, the direct energy weapon that took out the WTC was on a space-based platform in Earth's orbit. However, some 9/11 researchers claim that the direct energy weapon was actually nuclear bombs planted in the WTC (which is technically a direct energy weapon since it works by having particles collide with an atom's nucleus and that is, by definition, a direct energy weapon.) This is supported by the article at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05...-nuked-on-911/

But could a direct energy weapon on a space-based platform produce the same effect as nuclear bombs planted in the building? Looks like 9/11 truth should spend some time looking to this to determine which type of direct energy weapon was used. Better get John Hutchinson on the phone for this one!
Great article- my bet is mini nukes in the building, those center steel columns had to be super strong & not a space based platform. Demolition super accurate.
__________________
There is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, and there is nothing secret that will not become known and come to light. Luke 8:17
trixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 12:59 PM   #6
awake canuck
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

I have always thought crop circles were intricate tests of the SDI weapons system. ie how accurate could they direct the energy weapon and in what pattern.
awake canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 07:58 PM   #7
treesie
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 13 (1 Post)
Default partical beam

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanof2012 View Post
Judy Wood says the WTC was taken down by a direct energy weapon, and according to UFO researcher John Lear in his 2008 interview on Project Camelot, the direct energy weapon that took out the WTC was on a space-based platform in Earth's orbit. However, some 9/11 researchers claim that the direct energy weapon was actually nuclear bombs planted in the WTC (which is technically a direct energy weapon since it works by having particles collide with an atom's nucleus and that is, by definition, a direct energy weapon.) This is supported by the article at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05...-nuked-on-911/

But could a direct energy weapon on a space-based platform produce the same effect as nuclear bombs planted in the building? Looks like 9/11 truth should spend some time looking to this to determine which type of direct energy weapon was used. Better get John Hutchinson on the phone for this one!
I remember seeing a VHS doco on particle beams back in 1986 it was filmed in the desert some where in the US .They had a titan or minuteman missile standing a few mile away ,there was a 10 9 8 etc count down and the missile flew to pieces ,no noise, no flash ,nothing .After the camera pans over the instillation ,there was a huge lens and an entire factory complex to run it ,the commentator called it a maser which stood for micro wave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,if they could do that way back then ,I`m sure the instillation would be a lot smaller now
Kind regards Peter
treesie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2013, 09:28 PM   #8
dentedarthur
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10,983
Likes: 21 (21 Posts)
Default

What if they always intended to demolish the buildings, the two towers and wtc7

And someone jumped the gun by flying two planes into them
dentedarthur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 08:52 AM   #9
bryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 121 (70 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dentedarthur View Post
What if they always intended to demolish the buildings, the two towers and wtc7

And someone jumped the gun by flying two planes into them
That can be ruled out because the planes would have to be capable of supersonic speeds and the one shown in the videos is a subsonic design.
bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2013, 09:29 PM   #10
trixie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,115
Likes: 68 (49 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by awake canuck View Post
I have always thought crop circles were intricate tests of the SDI weapons system. ie how accurate could they direct the energy weapon and in what pattern.


I like your theory, don't know if it's correct. Could be just done from a plane with a laser perhaps too.
__________________
There is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, and there is nothing secret that will not become known and come to light. Luke 8:17
trixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
death ray, john lear, judy wood, nuclear, wtc

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.