Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > OPEN FORUM: Information share

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2019, 10:09 AM   #381
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

As of January 2019, BDSM and related depiction/media is now legalised once again - (EXCEPT WHERE IT IS DECIDED IT IS NOT - e.g: R. v Brown) - CONSENT IS NO DEFENCE

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidanc...e-publications

Wow! That clarifies things immensely!

Takes a bit of the heat off, maybe.

(Quote
"Where a person consents to an activity, as a matter of law such consent will not amount to a defence to assault occasioning actual bodily harm or worse: R v Brown and others [1994] 1 AC 212. Accordingly, publications which show or depict the infliction of serious harm may be considered to be obscene publications because they show criminal assault notwithstanding the consent of the victim. This includes dismemberment and graphic mutilation. It includes asphyxiation causing unconsciousness, which is more than transient and trifling, and given its danger is serious.

Harm should be assessed applying contemporary social standards. It need not be permanent, long-lasting, dangerous or mean that the victim requires treatment. Regard must be had to the effect upon, and circumstances of, the victim.

Each case must be considered on its own facts and merits. However, sexual / pornographic activity which involves the commission of a crime is likely to be obscene. Its criminalisation indicates its tendency to deprave or corrupt; where publication may tend to normalise or glorify such activity, or encourage its emulation, the statutory test of obscenity accordingly will likely be met.

Conversely, real caution must be exercised when assessing the tendency to deprave or corrupt of acts which Parliament has not provided should be subject to the criminal law, provided the likely audience is not under 18 or otherwise vulnerable. That is particularly so because whilst they may well be construed to be “repulsive”, “filthy”, “loathsome” or “lewd”, and so fall under ordinary language to be classified as obscene, that will not suffice for obscenity under the Act."

Last edited by grimstock; 02-02-2019 at 09:00 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2019, 05:56 PM   #382
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Operation Spanner Resource

The Spanner Case


"However, upon comparing this judgment to similar court cases involving heterosexual couples or others whose cruel and sadistic actions resulted in intentional or reckless infliction of injuries with the alleged victim's consent, some legal experts and advocacy groups have noted why they consider the R v Brown judgment to be an example of homophobia in the English legal system, which allows judges to legislate from the bench by using unequal and arbitrary applications of the law, and "paternalism" which intrudes on liberty.

For example, the R. v Wilson (1996) judgment ruled that an intentional act of human branding between heterosexuals which caused pain and permanent bodily harm (a scar) was a non-criminal act, on grounds of the alleged victim's consent; branding was one of the very same acts presented as evidence against the homosexuals in R. v Brown (as well as evidence of homosexual acts "even where no lasting harm or disability was caused"). R. v Wilson was decided after R. v Brown, but it remains unclear whether R. v Wilson or R. v Emmett might be used by the judiciary to constitute newer precedents for sadomasochistic acts between lovers. In R. v Jones (1987) and R. v Atkin & Others (1992), rough horseplay for no purpose besides enjoyment of sadistically taunting others to the point of injuring them was deemed non-criminal (even in cases where the victim has not consented, so long as the accused honestly but not reasonably believed the victim to have consented (DPP v Morgan 1976)). In the 1995 manslaughter case of R. v Slingsby, consent was considered a valid defence, when a man wore a signet ring as he engaged in the act of inserting his entire fist into his sexual partner's vagina and anus, which may cause pleasurable pain (algolagnia) for some women, as the homosexuals in the R. v Brown case were also acknowledged to be seeking sexual pleasure using painful acts (algolagnia); however, in R. v Slingsby, the injury only became a fatal one by accident, with the prosecutor contending recklessness. Safety advice which is commonly available online includes advisories that during fisting sharp objects even smaller than a signet ring should be avoided, including long or sharp fingernails..

R. v Brown also differs from the heterosexual cases of Wilson, Slingsby, and Emmett in that even recipients of injuries in R. v Brown were convicted of "aiding and abetting", for the crime of consenting to their own injuries, yet none of the women who remained alive in the heterosexual cases were even arrested for their decision to consent.

Marianne Giles, author of Criminal Law in a Nutshell, called it "Paternalism of an unelected, unrepresentative group who use but fail to acknowledge that power", as the House of Lords failed to establish a precise guide for the United Kingdom's courts to consistently decide where a defence of consent should succeed or where it should not, and as Roger Geary argues in Understanding Criminal Law, this lack of a precise guide gives rise to legislating from the bench or other kritocracy, and laws being applied unequally to homosexuals or others whose practices are in the minority where pain is inflicted with consent, even potentially body art such as tattooing. Some body art professionals worry that UK judges can interpret their practices as illegal, determining which consensual acts are too extreme and constitute assault, on a case-by-case basis, with no way of the practitioner knowing beforehand."

http://www.popflock.com/learn?s=Operation_Spanner

Last edited by grimstock; 02-02-2019 at 07:11 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2019, 07:06 AM   #383
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The use of the suffix "for sexual gratification" to criminalise lawful acts.

In the Spanner Case, we may see from the charges that the body modification and tattooist professional - Mr. Sebastian - had been charged with some serious "crimes" that were actually perfectly lawful and normal acts in his course of work, as it was decided by the court that the piercing(s), etc. had been carried out "for sexual gratification" of the consenting "victim". He was also charged with "administering an illegal substance" which -surprise,surprise- was a topical anaesthetic applied to the area to be pierced prior to piercing, in order to lessen any pain or discomfort - (a substance legal in most of the world including America, but still awaiting UK license at that time - a country where they still preferred the asphyxiation method to counter pain).

So we may assume that sexual gratification is now a criminal offence, as it alters the status of any action from lawful to unlawful.
However, I fail to see any law that indicates this had been in fact a correct interpretation.
Where is this law on sexual gratification?

So the body art was prosecuted as being unlawful, and the previously unstated consenting exemption discounted.
"for sexual gratification" was declared to be insufficient reason for an exemption.

However, it is no business of any court to enquire the purpose or effect of a piercing, as the act itself is either lawful or unlawful. It cannot be deemed unlawful due to effect it has on the wearer.
The use of a suffix to an otherwise unlawful act may only provide an exemption, it cannot be used in reverse to provide a criminalisation of an otherwise lawful act, unless the suffix determines the act as unlawful.

Since sexual gratification is neither an unlawful act, nor purpose, then the use of the suffix in the Spanner Case to provide a criminalisation of a lawful act is wholly inappropriate, and invalid, in my humble opinion.

The act involved - a professional body piercing- is either lawful or not, regardless of the purpose or effect of that piercing.

The resulting effect on the wearer of that body modification is not the business of anyone else, let alone the court, and neither can the result possibly be known by anyone prior to completion, nor should it be.

Last edited by grimstock; 04-02-2019 at 07:05 AM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2019, 07:30 AM   #384
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Had the use of the term "for sexual gratification" prevented any actions from being exempt from prosecution, then it had been the duty of the Court to make that exemption clear and entered in law at that point.

Everyone had fully consented - there had been no complaints, and there had been no further problems with the consenting actions other than theoretical and unsubstantiated predictions applied unfairly compared with other similar cases.

"For sexual gratification" should neither be seen as a crime, nor be used to negate a perfectly lawful action.

There had been no reasons as to why the Court should not have entered that exemption at the time ( - that is, apart from the fact that the ritual required/demanded 9 incarcerations in order to succeed, and that result had already been both sealed in 1989, and demanded prior to 1983 as the start date):

https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=108
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=132

The ritual/operation had been based on the numbers 3, 6, 9, sequence, as had the sentencing.

https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=134
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=260
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285

Last edited by grimstock; 04-02-2019 at 07:16 AM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2019, 11:11 AM   #385
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Duty of the Court to Create an Exemption - in this Case for Sexual Liaisons.

"It will be argued that when it comes to matters of public policy and what is “in the public interest”, judges should respectfully adhere to a basic principle of the rule of law, and not their seemingly religiously-inspired instincts, namely they should find in favour of the defendant not the Prosecution and therefore not criminalise people where there is an unsettled point of law. It is clear in the case of R v Brown that their Lordships were on the cusp of making such a libertarian-inspired decision but – by a narrow margin – I will respectfully argue that their fear, prejudice and irrationality got the better of them and that three of the five judges resorted to making a moralistic judgment. Where did this prejudice come from? From a secular perspective it could be argued it came from the omnipresence of the State religion in the lives of our “establishment” figures and in the day to day workings of our courts.

----------------------------

So the law is construed so as to attempt to protect people from being subjected to unlawful physical interventions and assaults, but it is flexible enough to accommodate activities and actions which society might deem necessary or desirable. The list of “exceptions” is not a closed list and judges are at liberty within the constraints of the doctrine of precedence to widen the list.*

It was precisely this – a request to include consensual homosexual sado-masochistic sex within the list of “exceptions” – to which the defence of informed consent by sui juris adults could be deployed in the event of harm that R v Brown was concerned with.

When the lists above are considered (together with the rule of law principle not to criminalise where the law is unclear), it may therefore seem surprising that their Lordships refused to invent a “consent” defence for homosexual sado-masochistic sex. This is especially so, given the warning by Lord Devlin who stated “…a law that appears to be arbitrary and illogical, in the end and after the wave of moral indignation that has put it on the statute book subsides, forfeits respect.” [35]

Surprising that is, until the personal biases (informed by prevailing social context) are recognised and considered."

https://lawyerssecularsociety.wordpr...ective-part-2/
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________________
(* There is already an exemption for sado-masochistic activities, but only for heterosexual married partners)
However, this fact may also intimate that it is unlawful to be single or homosexual and engage in SM activities, as there is no indication as to why the exemption of these activities should be restricted to the confines of heterosexual marriage. This also indicates religious bias and interference in decision-making of the courts.


It would also naturally follow that if SM activities of some severity are lawful within a heterosexual marriage, then they are indeed lawful also for all of consenting age. There is no false boundary where acts may become unlawful outside of wedlock, and it is wholly inappropriate and wrongful for law to be construed in such a manner.

Marriage does not exempt a person from the law, and neither should sexuality.

Last edited by grimstock; 04-02-2019 at 09:07 AM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2019, 05:48 PM   #386
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Spanner Investigation had been launched following an "inquiry" into adverts in gay magazines.

"It is understood the investigation, one of the largest by the obscene
publications squad, was launched following an inquiry into advertisements
in homosexual magazines."

https://www.heraldscotland.com/defau...to-16-arrests/

__________________________________________________ _________

"There were two distinct separate parts to Operation Spanner;

1) 1983 to 1986 covert raids on advertisers and responders to a gay magazine
involving over 620 raids, of which no defendants or charges were forthcoming, but resulting in over 60 alleged suicides. This part of the operation was not publicised. From the information available. it may also be presumed that the alleged suicides were mostly, if not all, “potential defendants”.

2) 1987 to 1989 The Spannermen case involving 16+ raids. This was carried out with full media coverage upon charging, including false claims and lies, and centred around visitors to a Bryn Alyn child abuse whistleblower’s address."
____________________________________
"The Dragnet-Sting Operation and the Searches:
In 1983/84 the Obscene Publications Squad with the assistance of Manchester Police (headed by James Anderton) were believed to have operated or monitored (or both) a gay contact magazine, “Gay Galaxy” as a dragnet sting operation; (a honeytrap). This was the preliminary intelligence-gathering ground (and also the hunting ground) for the Spanner Operation, and was already underway by early 1983.
The magazine carried adverts that were much more extreme than other gay magazines."

There would appear to be over 100 suspicious deaths of gay men seemingly linked to "Gay Galaxy" adverts.

https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2018/...-by-grimstock/
__________________________________________________ _________________

Original Spannermen video was obtained by Obscene Publications Squad in London via a contact magazine advert:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQJoyjyuo3E
Several Millions to hunt the men down? --No! - They already had the name and address of the sender (Colin Lasky)
The several millions in costs had been falsely transferred from the "Gay Galaxy" culling operation as it progressed
The Spanner Case had also been an alibi (and a source/means of securing covert public funding) for the culling operation.

The magazine ceased trading in 1984-85 tax year. / The culling had two different sections./ The Operation Spanner knighthood.
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=376

Last edited by grimstock; 08-02-2019 at 05:27 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2019, 06:23 PM   #387
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grimstock View Post
THE PURPOSE OF THE GAY GALAXY MAGAZINE


The purpose of the magazine had been to proactively solicit evidence and engage in correspondence relating to behaviour deemed incompatible with Christian fundamentalist ideals, (in accordance with the Church of England "Christian Family Values" campaign - a.k.a. "Operation Spanner") and thus identify (and possibly arrange covert meetings with) those victims that may have been suitable for targeting, perhaps in addition to recovering and seizing movies related to elite child abuse, and snuff movies involving identifiable missing children or VIP's. It is believed that perhaps as many as dozens of adverts relating to various and all types of behaviour may have been placed by police each month in the magazine, with perhaps a total of up to 150 to 200 (or so) adverts appearing in each edition, with the most extreme examples originating from the police.
Some adverts in the magazine had at various times been actively seeking victims for such things as "play" kidnapping, suffocation, beatings and knife mutilation, and on the odd occasion, snuff films.
Nevertheless, merely advertising or responding to an advert in the magazine had often at times appeared as sufficient behaviour for being targeted.
Had the extreme and unlawful adverts appeared on behalf of private individuals, that would soon have been stopped and the culprits arrested. However, despite several raids by Manchester police claimed by Gay Galaxy operators - one of which was reported by the magazine to have taken all computers and files- those adverts never ceased and continued to appear every month.
Had those sort of extreme and unlawful adverts ever appeared in any other UK advertising source or publication before or since Galaxy? - Certainly not to my knowledge.

Since the ritual had been limited to three years for the actual (main) culling, and the purpose of the magazine was to swiftly and effortlessly seek and identify potential victims for the cull, (and particularly with the costs of running the magazine mounting all the time) full use would have been made of such an opportunity. It is believed that over 640 raids were initially carried out in that respect between 1983 and 1986.
------------------------------------------------------

“In Operation Spanner, the police had acted pro-actively through the use of gay magazines, to what was claimed __( by police and media)__ to be a child pornography or paedophile ring__________ however, details that emerged during the trial made it clear that this was not a child sex ring, and most of the actions involved were morality offenses rather than crimes.
The accused presented a plausible defense that their acts were consensual and victimless. only to have this dismissed by the judge. The media were thus able to present this as the conviction of a sex ring”.
Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain
By Philip Jenkins

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...panner&f=false
(scroll down).
Since the magazine had only been in operation for around two years, it had obviously satisfied the statistical requirements for the 6 year ritual with considerable ease during that time.

All statistics for the whole operation had been set out prior to the start date of 1983.
81 men sentenced - 15 by the court case and 66 (potential defendants) - believed to have been through summary execution at home. (Alleged suicides - usually with notes, and confirmed as "over 60")
Assuming the total early deaths (confirmed to be "over 100") to be 111 (and the known statistics would appear to confirm this figure), then 45 other men (non- potential defendants) as unsolved murders - believed to have been mostly taking place in secluded outdoor settings by many provincial plain-clothes masonic initiate police gangs, with the deaths possibly sometimes enacting uniquely related and deadly extremities of what the men had been "into". For a good example of 2 such unsolved murders: (as possible and unrelated example only)
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=196

The Solis seal (111 deceased as a hexagram curse = 6x111) had been intended to prevent/curse tampering with the results and also relates to/curses all "ritual pathway" victims (666 including those to be imprisoned) and all the deceased (+111) and seals the whole operation and statistics with the necessary 777 completion end code.
All statistics -including the 9 incarcerations- had thus been pre-determined prior to 1983, and sealed on (1989) completion, and prior to any hearings of the court case: (Only the victims had to be chosen)
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=164

Last edited by grimstock; 09-02-2019 at 06:17 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2019, 07:26 PM   #388
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Had similar killings continued after the Gay Galaxy magazine and after Operation Spanner through the use of other media - magazines or online dating?

https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=197
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2019, 08:29 PM   #389
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Elite Torture Children & Drink Their Adrenalised Blood

From Andrew Cheetham




Read/see more:
https://www.davidicke.com/article/52...enalised-blood
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2019, 08:55 PM   #390
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Deep State Predictions 2019: Major Data Dump with DAVID WILCOCK [Part 1/5!]



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am1GTR3_SdM
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2019, 09:43 PM   #391
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Spanner Case sentencing in December 1990 adhered strictly to the 369 code(s)/numbers used for the ritual.

The main codes used:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=134

---For new link to info on 66 ritual hexcraft pathway (6, 66, 666*) and Solis seal, see:
https://gematria.codes/tag/solis-seal/
(* Total number of house raids in the operation confirmed as "over 640")

The sentencing in months / The Spanner occult signature:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=260
Total sentences = 369 months = 18 = 666

The sentencing in months under full reduction:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285
639963 = 36 = 3+6=9 incarcerations
(6+3=9)+(9=6+3)= 18 = 666
639 + 963 = 18 + 18 = 666 + 666
639+963=9+9+9+9(+9 incarcerated)= 45 end seal completion.

Last edited by grimstock; 10-02-2019 at 08:19 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2019, 08:04 AM   #392
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Operation Spanner hexcraft 66 ritual pathway to material gain.

6,66,666 and the setting out of the ritual through the use of 3x3 rituals
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=164

Using code 6 (ritual sacrifice) of the operation -

6 (code/saturn) x 66 ritual deaths (pathway/alleged suicides) = 396 (Operation codes)= 18
= 666 (beast/total victims)

Successful businessmen had been included in the deaths.It is not known how many died intestate.
Personal items and goods of considerable value had also been seized and confiscated from the 666 victims.
Items may possibly also have been stolen and undeclared from single and targeted/deceased men's houses. Jewellery, watches and suchlike- in addition to clothing and expensive equipment- had also reportedly been seized and never returned from/during the spannermen raids, and officially declared as "goods used in the commission of a crime", although heavy concrete blocks etc., had not been touched.

66 – Gematria Study & Occult Illuminati Symbolism:
https://gematria.codes/tag/solis-seal/

66 ritual deaths believed to have occurred at victims homes (alleged suicides) under code 6 (ending 1986)
45 deaths believed to have occurred at secluded locations (death from other causes) under code 9 (ending 1989)
Solis Seal / locking statistics with curse/ cursing all gay victims = 66+45=111 x code 6 = 666

666 + 111 = 777 (666=18=9 + 111=3 -->=3 =21=777)



__________________________________________________ _____________

The Operation Spanner “Gay Cure Therapy” of death and rebirth.
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=201

Last edited by grimstock; 13-02-2019 at 07:09 AM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2019, 08:24 AM   #393
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Spannermen had been ensnared through the police responding covertly to adverts in (and placing covert advertisements in) "gay" magazines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by grimstock View Post
[B][I]In Operation Spanner, the police had acted pro-actively through the use of gay magazines, to what was claimed __( by police and media)__ to be a child pornography or paedophile ring__________ however, details that emerged during the trial made it clear that this was not a child sex ring, and most of the actions involved were morality offenses rather than crimes.
The accused presented a plausible defense that their acts were consensual and victimless. only to have this dismissed by the judge. The media were thus able to present this as the conviction of a sex ring.

Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain
By Philip Jenkins
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...panner&f=false
(The above is a summarised account)
If the link fails to load, then please refresh the page.

Last edited by grimstock; 12-02-2019 at 04:04 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2019, 07:21 PM   #394
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The End Seal Completion

Quote:
Originally Posted by grimstock View Post
The Spanner Case sentencing in December 1990 adhered strictly to the 369 code(s)/numbers used for the ritual.

The main codes used:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=134

---For new link to info on 66 ritual hexcraft pathway (6, 66, 666*) and Solis seal, see:
https://gematria.codes/tag/solis-seal/
(* Total number of house raids in the operation confirmed as "over 640")

The sentencing in months / The Spanner occult signature:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=260
Total sentences = 369 months = 18 = 666

The sentencing in months under full reduction:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285
639963 = 36 = 3+6=9 incarcerations
(6+3=9)+(9=6+3)= 18 = 666
639 + 963 = 18 + 18 = 666 + 666
639+963=9+9+9+9(+9 incarcerated)= 45 end seal completion.

Although the ritual had been required to end in September 1989 ( 9-999), had the end seal of 45 (99999) been left with an unspecified date in order to be actually placed by the court whenever the sentencing took place? The end date specified for the ritual, September 1989 (9999) also specifies with the four nines, "divine completion with unfinished business".

Had this been the case, then it would suggest that 9 of the (other) deaths involved the intended death of the spirit (through incarcerations) rather than the body. This would still leave over 100 sacrificial deaths, but then give the "other" violent sacrificial deaths as 36 and with 3+6=9 incarcerations (as above) to complete the ritual. A compelling possibility nevertheless.
It sounds also feasible, and the jury is still out on that one; perhaps we may never know.

This would also explain both the unique formations of the figures above under "sentencing in months under full reduction" as released by the media; and also perhaps the weighty unnecessary sentencing.
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=260
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285

I therefore believe that this may indeed be the correct interpretation - and one which indicates/includes the jailings as a necessary part of the ritual - and also demonstrates that the sentences handed down in December 1990 had been formulated to complete the ritual figures for the seal to be correctly in place.

This then only affects code 9 statistics of the operation, and suggests total deaths of 102, and that;
Total sacrificial early deaths from causes other than "suicide"/natural reasons had been 36
Incarcerations of 9 to be added to 36 for inclusion in seal of ritual = 45 - (see sentencing!)
Seal and curse = 66 ritual suicides + 36 deaths from other causes (not natural) + 9 jailings = 111 Solis seal.

Last edited by grimstock; 13-02-2019 at 06:09 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2019, 07:53 PM   #395
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Had the Court been correct in dismissing "sexual gratification" as a deciding factor?

Sexual Satisfaction: Highly Valued, Poorly Understood

Our understanding of sexual satisfaction is unsatisfactory

Sexual satisfaction is an important goal, a key component in a good relationship and a good life. Yet, surprisingly, our understanding of the concept is quite limited and incomplete.

One reason for this limited knowledge is that sexual gratification, like many large psychological concepts (intelligence, love, etc.), is easy to experience and comprehend intuitively but difficult to define and measure with precision. Here’s a quick thought experiment: How would you define and calculate ‘sexual satisfaction?’ Is it about the number of orgasms per sexual encounter? Or perhaps per month? Or perhaps the number of orgasms in relation to your partner, or your friends, or what you had in your previous relationship? Or maybe you prefer to focus on the intensity of the orgasm—quality over quantity? Or perhaps it is the feelings of intimacy and emotional closeness arising from sex, regardless of orgasm? Or perhaps it is a particular combination of all of these? But if so, what mix? Sexual satisfaction, it turns out, is a slippery and subjective notion, not easily dissected and analyzed with scientific tools.

Another reason we know so little is that the study of sex in general, and female sex in particular, is a relatively new and fraught endeavor. In many societies around the world the subject is still taboo. Historically, even in societies considered advanced, it was until quite recently held that women did not particularly enjoy sex, were definitely not entitled to sexual pleasure, and—given their low social-economic-political status—did not merit serious study.

Today, however, we know that the question of sexual satisfaction is relevant for men and women alike. Both men and women have the capacity, desire, and right to experience a satisfying sexual life.

The Spanish researcher Maria de la Sanchez Fuentes and her colleagues in 2013 published an extensive summary of the literature on sexual satisfaction. The authors reviewed the results of 197 scientific studies, published between 1979 and 2012, which included some 40 different measures of sexual satisfaction. The findings showed no significant difference between the level of sexual satisfaction of men and women. The researchers found that, as expected, healthy people are more sexually satisfied. Physical (heart disease, diabetes, etc.) and psychological (depression, anxiety) problems were correlated with reduced levels of satisfaction.

As expected, sexual functioning itself is important for sexual satisfaction. Those who experience strong sexual desire and whose sexual instruments work properly (arousal, erection, vaginal lubrication, orgasm) report more satisfaction than those who experience pain, erectile dysfunction, vaginal dryness, or lack of orgasm. Social support, good family relations, and high economic status also predict sexual satisfaction.

In addition to ill health and physical impairment, a number of other factors have been linked in the literature to decreased sexual satisfaction. A history of abuse or sexual trauma predicts lower levels of satisfaction. People with sexual guilt or those who are flooded with negative or threatening cognitions during intercourse ("It's immoral," "I do not look good," etc.) tend to experience lower satisfaction level. The use of pornography also predicts lower level of satisfaction, as does financial, family, or personal stress. Sexual satisfaction as a rule declines with age, as do the frequency of sex and of thoughts about sex.

Read more:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...rly-understood

Last edited by grimstock; 13-02-2019 at 09:28 AM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-02-2019, 06:24 PM   #396
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Codes Updates / Hexcraft Sentencing:

Operation Codes update:


See also:
The Spannermen Final Charges Issued :
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=132
Operation Codes:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=134
3x3 rituals/victims:
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=164

The Hexagram seal - 111 x 6 (saturn/hexagram)- had been set by the judges/court via the sentencing.

3333 represents 3 as itself as 3+3+3+3=12 parts of operation completed, as 1+2=3 as ending of the operation. As 3x3x3x3=81 represents total number of men sentenced - 15 Spannermen and 66 sentenced from first part. As 8+1=9 also signifies sentencing completion with 9 incarcerations.
As (3+3)x(3+3) = 36 additional sacrificial deaths for seal, as 3+6=9 incarcerations for seal.

9999 = Indicates divine completion with unfinished business (sentencing and incarcerations), As 9+9+9+9=36= both 18+18=666+666, as satisfactory completion of both parts, and number 36 of non-defendants meeting early death by other (non-suicide) means, as 3+6=9 shows both the code for this part, and the number of incarcerations to follow, and the end date of both the second part and the police/Witchfinder operation as 9/1989=36 =9999.

Brothers in Arms

The Old Bailey original Sentencing:
Sentencing in months 369 = (operation codes)
3x(6+9)=45 / 3+6=9 / 36+9=45 requested/completed statistics.
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=260

Old Bailey Hexcraft Sentencing in months in given order/ under full reduction "639963":
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285
https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=394

Total men sentenced =66(code 6)+15=81=8+1=9 incarcerations requested.
Totals of 36(non-defendant)deaths and 3+6=9 incarcerations (code 9):
66+36+9 incarcerations=111 hexagram ritual end completed seal/curse(code 3)


------------------ 6------+--------39----------------=18+(6x39)234+(9x63)567=1+234+567+8=36=9+
------------------ 9------+------- 63----------------=18--------------= 9
---------------______ -------- _______----------_____-----------____
--------------- ^15 sentenced^102 total deaths--^36 deaths code^9

1) (6x3)(9x9)(6x3) = 6x3=666 / 9x9=81 (total sentenced) / 6x3=666
2) 6+3+9+9+6+3 = 36 (additional deaths) = 3+6=9 requested incarcerations/ = 36+9=45 requested hexagram completion
3) (9+6)x3=15 men sentenced by this court x3 = 45 requested hexagram (part)completion
4) (6+3=9)+(9=6+3)= Hexagram = 9+9=18= 6x(3 sided triangles) = 666 total ritual victims
5) (6+3+9)+(9+6+3) = 18 + 18 = 666 + 666 - unfinished business now completed
6) 6+3+9+9+6+3 = 36= 9999 ritual end code +9 incarcerated=99999 sentencing end code= 45=4+5=9 completed incarcerations/end hexagram seal (full)completion.
7) (6x3=)666 / (9+9=18)666 / (6x3=)666
8) (63=7x9=) 777/777/777 -- (99=33x3=) 33/33/33 -- (63=7x9=) 777/777/777
639963

Last edited by grimstock; 16-02-2019 at 06:22 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2019, 06:53 AM   #397
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

The Hexagram Seal Completion (updated)

3) 6+39=45 requested hexagram (part)completion=(9+6)x3=15 men sentenced by this court x code3 =45

6) 6+3+9+9+6+3 = 36= 9999 ritual end code=3+6= +9 incarcerated=99999 sentencing end code= 45=4+5=9 completed incarcerations/end hexagram seal (full)completion.

9) (6+3+9)+(9+6+3) =18+18=666+666=36=9+ = 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45=9

https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...&postcount=285

Last edited by grimstock; 17-02-2019 at 04:25 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2019, 08:24 AM   #398
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

How the secret society "brotherhood" manipulate a case through teamwork to ensure a particular outcome is reached/guaranteed. (From 17 minutes into the video).




https://www.ickonic.com/

Last edited by grimstock; 17-02-2019 at 04:15 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-02-2019, 06:18 PM   #399
grimstock
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 1,040 (632 Posts)
Default

Please note that although some statistics/codes may have been estimated, it is nevertheless believed that there is sufficient corroborating evidence to both justify and support their usage. Many statistics have also been confirmed, for example the 3,6,9 codes and the 6,66,666 hexcraft pathway statistics among others.

Many pieces of the puzzle may never be revealed, but I do hope that I may have pieced together a sufficient amount of information that may provide a much better understanding of Operation Spanner than the very limited dis' and mis' information that has previously been published and much copied and pasted BS fairy stories that you will come across when seeking the truth about the operation.

There is now no excuse for anyone continuing to publish and promote the false official narrative any more. There is no evidence to support the official story at all. Within these pages alone it has been shown to have been mostly lies.

There are over 100 desperate souls who died unexpectedly early who would wish their loved ones to know the manner and reasons for their demise, and over 60 of those who would wish their remaining loved ones to know that they did not commit suicide as was officially claimed and recorded at the time.

May their wishes be finally granted, and may they find the rest and eternal peace they deserve so much.


Thank you for your time and interest!
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________

And a very sad but necessary farewell to the original David Icke Forum as it becomes archived.
Hopefully I shall see you all on the new forum. Many thanks to all those who made this a wonderful journey and a very memorable experience over the years!

With a very special thanks to our hosts!

Last edited by grimstock; 18-02-2019 at 01:03 PM.
grimstock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
child abuse, law, saturn worship, suspicious deaths, witchcraft

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.