Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > War on Terror

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2009, 09:16 AM   #221
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

I.A.E.A. FINDS NO EVIDENCE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM AT QOM SO IT’S BACK TO ‘IRAN SUPPLIES WEAPONS TO HAMAS AND HEZBOLLAH’ TO KICK OFF NEW WAR.

Friday, November 06, 2009

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei said yesterday that there’s nothing to worry about at Iran’s nuclear facility at Qom. The news will not please the Zionist warmongers in Israel and their neocon fellow travellers in the US who insist that Iran has a ‘nuclear weapons program’ which, according to the Israelis, they want to use to ‘wipe Israel (and most of Palestine) of the map’.[1]

The Israeli Zionists and their neocon supporters in the US have been using the ‘Iran has a nuclear weapons program’ and the Iran wants to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ nonsense for some years now in the hope that they can drum up enough support from world-wide public opinion to justify attacking Iran in order to bring about a regime change there. But each time they beat their war drums and build it up to a crescendo where there could well have been an attack against Iran, along comes ElBaradei to rain on their parade by saying that there’s still no evidence of any Iranian ‘nuclear weapons program’. And each time that has happened, a pattern has emerged whereby Israel attempt to find some other casus belli to get at Iran via either Hezbollah in south Lebanon or Hamas in the Gaza Strip or both.

On several occasions during these past few years Israel has attacked both the Gaza Strip and south Lebanon on some Israeli-manipulated pretext or another in order to try and drag Iran into these wars thus providing an excuse to attack Iran directly with the help of the US. So far the Israelis have failed miserably.

But now it seems the Israelis might me up for another try at stirring up a war via Hamas or Hezbollah in the light of ElBaradei’s latest pronouncements about his findings at Qom.

Israel now claims that Hamas have secretly tested a new missile, supplied to them by Iran of course, with a range of around sixty miles which means Tel Aviv could be targeted. As a result, an article in ‘Ha’aretz’ today claims that Israel is preparing Israel for another assault against the people of the Gaza. On top of that, Israel has also claimed that a ship it stopped and hijacked on the high seas was delivering arms supplied by Iran destined for Hezbollah in Lebanon providing the possibility of another excuse to attack the people of Lebanon in the hope of escalating such a war to draw in Iran and the US.

Just as 114 states at the UN endorse the Goldstone report on Israeli warcrimes committed in the Gaza, the stage seems to be set for yet another act of murder and mayhem designed to get the US to attack Iran. The Israeli sense of timing is always immaculate.


ENDNOTE

[1] Israel has never explained how Iran intended to use its nuclear weapon against such a tiny nation as Israel without doing untold harm to the entire region including Irans allies; the Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and the people of south Lebanon. Nor has Israel ever explained how Iran hoped to avoid a retaliatory nuclear strike by either Israel or the US.
http://lataan.blogspot.com/2009/11/i...f-nuclear.html
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 09:50 AM   #222
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Nilin marking 20 years to the fall of the berlin wall by taking down the wall on their land

__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 09:56 AM   #223
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Israeli tank fire hits house in Gaza Strip

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:18:11 GMT



Israeli tanks have shelled a house in the east of the Hamas-run Gaza Strip, leaving at least two people wounded.

The attack, which came on late Friday, caused panic among Palestinian families living in the vicinity, a Press TV correspondent reported.

An Israeli army spokeswoman confirmed the attack, saying "a suspicious figure was spotted by our forces" near the barrier separating Gaza from the occupied West Bank, AFP said.

In January, the Israeli army launched a massive military offensive against the populated coastal sliver, killing more than 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, and many thousands more wounded.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id...51020202RS/MMN
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/

Last edited by accuracy; 07-11-2009 at 09:59 AM.
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 08:02 AM   #224
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Palestine - Before Israeli Genocide And Theft - Vid


Quote:
calista48
October 29, 2007

(more info)
(less info) Want to Subscribe?
Sign In or Sign Up now!
The old lie that palestine was dry desert waiting for a people is just that--a lie. This clip for all people to see the Beauty of the Palestinian People before they were ethnically cleansed and mur...
The old lie that palestine was dry desert waiting for a people is just that--a lie. This clip for all people to see the Beauty of the Palestinian People before they were ethnically cleansed and murdered and made into refugees by the State of Israe.
Music Joaquin Rodrigo, lyrics Helmut Lotti, sung by Lotti
All Photos (b&w) from http://fai.cyberia.net.lb/

For Hani, My husband, Best friend & Hero
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 09:04 AM   #225
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

US Senators Act to Force Recognition of Jerusalem as Capital

11/07/09,
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134275

IsraelNN.com) Seven United States senators have sponsored a bill that would abolish the “security” waiver that American presidents have used to prevent implementing a 1995 law declaring that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

Kansas Republican Senator Sam Brownback, a long-time supporter of Israel, introduced the bill and said, "It is long overdue for America to recognize the sovereign right of Israel to choose Jerusalem as its capital city.”

The proposed Jerusalem Embassy Relocation Act law, number S. 2737, is "a bill to relocate to Jerusalem the United States Embassy in Israel" and has six co-sponsors--five Republicans, from Kentucky, Texas, Arizona, and Louisiana and Independent Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.

It would remove the current waiver, which gives the president authority to delay recognition of Jerusalem as the capital on the premise that doing so would endanger the security of the United States. Previous presidents, including George W. Bush, vowed during their election campaigns they would recognize Jerusalem as the Jewish State’s capital but they have failed out to carry out their election promise.

The senators introduced the bill following last week’s visit to the United States by Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, who said, “I believe moving the American embassy to Jerusalem will the first step towards other embassies moving to the capital, as in every other country in the world.”

U.S. policy regards eastern Jerusalem, restored to Israel in the Six-Day War in 1967, as “occupied territory" and wants the status of the city to be part of an agreement to establish the Palestinian Authority as a new Arab state on all of the land in eastern Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and Gaza.

The Democratic party has a majority in the Congress but includes legislators who support Israeli sovereignty over all of the capital. The certain opposition of the Obama administration to Senator Brownback's bill may prevent its passage, but the proposal will bring the status of the city to center stage.

Administration officials have increasingly found it more difficult to explain to reporters their policy in the PA-Israeli struggle, particularly in light of the refusal of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas to resume negotiations with Israel.

Abbas announced late this week that he will not run for reelection, a move that magnified recent difficulties of U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly to satisfy reporters. He was unable to tell them on Friday if government officials have been in touch with Abbas since his announcement, and instead he repeated previous statements that the Obama government considers him a “voice of moderation.”

In answer to a question on whether there should be PA elections in January in light of the division between Hamas, which rules Gaza, and Fatah, which rules Judea and Samaria, Kelly said, “The decision to hold elections is a – is really – that's a matter for the people themselves to decide.”

Reporters noted that his statement contradicted American policy of four years that was insistent that the PA holds it first legislative election, which resulted in a surprise victor for the Hamas terrorist organization.

Quote:
from WRH website:

This it eh US and Israel telling the United Nations "Fuck You" following the General Assembly vote on the Goldstone Report. The world is about to get a good look at just how rogue Israel really is!

Palestinian Refugees have the right to return to their homes in Israel.
General Assembly Resolution 194, Dec. 11, 1948
"Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible."

Israel's occupation of Palestine is Illegal.
Security Council Resolution 242, Nov. 22, 1967
Calls for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from territories occupied in the war that year and "the acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

Israel's settlements in Palestine are Illegal.
Security Council Resolution 446, March 22, 1979
"Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East."

Palestinian have the right to Self-Determination.
General Assembly Resolution 3236, November 22, 1974
Affirms "the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine...to self-determination without external interference" and "to national independence and sovereignty."

Resolution 127: recommends Israel suspend its no-man's zone' in Jerusalem.

Resolution 250: calls on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem.

Resolution 251: deeply deplores Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250.

Resolution 252: declares invalid Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital.

Resolution 267: censures Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem.

Resolution 271: condemns Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem.

Resolution 298: deplores Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem.

Resolution 476: reiterates that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are null and void.

Resolution 478: censures (Israel) in the strongest terms for its claim to Jerusalem in its Basic Law.
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 08:53 AM   #226
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Israeli forces shell northern Gaza

November 08, 2009



Gaza – Ma’an – Israeli shells landed in an open area in the northern Gaza Strip on Sunday, causing panic but no injuries, witnesses said.

Residents of the area said three shells landed in the Abu Safieyah area east of the city of Jabaliya. The residents added that the shelling was apparently unprovoked.

One Palestinian living in the area told Ma’an, "The shelling caused fear among the residents who live in these agricultural areas that their houses could be hit by these shells."

An Israeli military spokesperson confirmed that Israeli soldiers fired mortars at what they believed to be the source of rockets fired into Israeli territory. The military said they were still investigating whether rockets were indeed fired across the border.


IOF troops open fire at farmers in northern Gaza

07/11/2009 -




GAZA, (PIC)-- Israeli occupation forces (IOF) opened heavy machine gun fire at Palestinian farmers while tending to their lands north of the Gaza Strip on Saturday, local sources reported.

A source in the area told Quds Press that the IOF soldiers fired an artillery shell then opened machineguns at the farmers east of Jabaliya in northern Gaza Strip.

Farmers were forced to abandon their lands due to the heavy gunfire that was coupled with intensified flights for IOF warplanes.

A number of Palestinian citizens were wounded on Friday night when the IOF troops fired a projectile at them east of Gaza city.

http://alethonews.blogspot.com/2009/...hern-gaza.html
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 09:47 AM   #227
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

MORE ON KOSHER SANCTIONED MURDER

November 9, 2009



Kill Enemy Children: Jewish Edict
By Khalid Amayreh

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM – A Jewish rabbi has issued a book giving Jews permission to murder non-Jews, including babies and children, who may pose an actual or potential threat to Jews or Israel. “It is permissible to kill the Righteous among non-Jews even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation,” Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, who heads the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar settlement in the occupied West Bank, wrote in his book “The King’s Torah.”

He argues that goyem (a derogatory epithet for non-Jews) may be killed if they threaten Israel.

“If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments – because we care about the commandments – there is nothing wrong with the murder.”

Shapiro, who heads a small Talmudic school at the settlement of Yitzhar near Nablus, claims his edict “is fully justified by the Torah and the Talmud.”

The anti-goyem edict seems to come in response to the arrest by Israeli police of a Jewish terrorist who has confessed to having murdered two Palestinian shepherds in the West Bank.



The terrorist, an American-born immigrant named Yaakov Teitel, also confessed to have tried to assassinate leftist Jewish figures.

Police considered the arrest an important achievement in combating Jewish terrorism, which experts contend thrives on religious edicts issued by rabbis affiliated with the religious-Zionist camp.

Nearly 16 years ago, a Jewish terrorist named Yigal Amir assassinated then Israeli Premier Yitzhak Rabin.

Moreover, numerous innocent Palestinians have also been murdered in cold blood by Jewish terrorists.

In 1994, Baruch Goldstein, a notorious Jewish terrorist, murdered 29 Muslim worshipers inside Al-Ibrahimi Mosque in the West Bank town of al-Khalil.

Non-Humans

The controversial edict is backed by numerous rabbis affiliated with the so-called national-religious camp as well as the Talmudic seminary in West Jerusalem, known as Merkaz Ha’rav.

Among the rabbis who have publicly supported the edict are Yitzhak Ginsburg and Ya’akov Yosef.

Ginsburg had written a leaflet glorifying murderer Goldstein and called him a “saintly figure.”

Shapiro’s views on how Palestinians and non-Jews in general ought to be treated according to Jewish religious law (halacha) are widely looked at as representing the mainstream not the exception in Israel.

During the Israeli onslaught against Gaza earlier this year, Mordecahi Elyahu, one of the leading rabbinic figures in Israel, urged the army not to refrain from killing enemy children in order to save the lives of Israeli soldiers.

He had even petitioned the Israeli government to carry out a series of carpet bombing of Palestinian population centers in Gaza.

“If they don’t stop after we kill 100, then we must kill a thousand. And if they do not stop after we kill a thousand, then we must kill 10,000. If they still don’t stop, we must kill 100,000, even a million. Whatever it takes to stop them.”

According to Israel Shahak, author of “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: the Weight of Three Thousand years,” the term “human beings” in Jewish law refers solely to Jews.

Many Jewish orthodox rabbis, especially within the national-religious sector, view international conventions incriminating the deliberate killing of civilians and destruction of civilian homes and property as representing “Christian morals” not binding on Jews.

In 2006, the Rabbinic Council of Jewish Settlements in the West Bank urged the army “to ignore Christian morals and exterminate the enemy in the north (Lebanon) and the south (Gaza Strip).

Such manifestly racist and hateful edicts don’t raise many eyebrows in Israel, neither among the intelligentsia nor in the society at large.

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/200...tioned-murder/
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 08:54 AM   #228
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Abbas Threatens to Dismantle PA, Declare Peace Process Failed

By politicaltheatrics Published: November 10, 2009



Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is considering dissolving the PA and declaring the failure of the peace process with Israel, PA officials in Ramallah said over the weekend.

Abbas was now waiting to see if the US and other parties would exert enough pressure on Israel to stop settlement construction and recognize the two-state solution before he makes any decision, the officials said.
In his televised speech on Thursday, in which he announced that he has “no desire” to run in the upcoming presidential election, Abbas said that he would also consider taking “other measures” in the future, but did not elaborate.

He was “threatening” to dissolve the PA in protest against Washington’s failure to support his demand for a complete freeze of settlement construction as a precondition for the resumption of peace negotiations with Israel, the officials said.
Over the weekend, Abbas instructed the Palestinian Central Elections Committee to continue preparations for holding presidential and parliamentary elections on January 24. He met in Ramallah with the heads of the committee, Hanna Naser and Rami Hamdallah, and instructed them to take all measures to ensure that the vote is held on time in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and occupied Jerusalem, according to a statement released by Abbas’s office.

His decision to go ahead with plans to hold the vote came despite his announcement on Thursday that he has “no desire” to run in the election.

It remains unclear, however, how the vote would take place in the Gaza Strip, where the Hamas government has already announced that it won’t allow the balloting to take place. Moreover, it’s not certain that Israel would permit the vote to take place inside the municipal boundaries of occupied Jerusalem.

Abbas has come under pressure from some world leaders and his loyalists to withdraw his decision to drop out of the race, his aides said. “In light of the growing pressure,” Abbas may have to reconsider his decision, they said.

In various parts of the West Bank, Abbas loyalists marched in the streets in support of the PA president. Others published advertisements in PA-controlled newspapers declaring their support for Abbas and urging him to seek reelection.

Most of the demonstrators were Fatah members and policemen serving in the PA security forces. Some of those who published the pro-Abbas advertisements said they had been asked by senior PA officials to do so.

Some Fatah operatives in the occupied West Bank said that Abbas would change his mind only if he felt that he had enough support from the US and the Arab world. “The president is waiting to see how much support he has before he makes any decision,” said a Fatah official closely associated with Abbas. “If he does not feel that he has enough backing, he might even step down and announce the dismantlement of the Palestinian Authority.”

Another Fatah official said that Abbas’s decision not to run for another term was primarily aimed at sending a message to the Americans and Arabs.

“Abbas is trying to tell the US administration that its bias in favor of Israel is sabotaging the peace process,” the official told The Jerusalem Post. “He’s particularly upset with [US Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton, because he feels that she’s the one who convinced President Barack Obama to soften his attitude on the issue of settlements.”
Abbas, according to one of his top aides, is also “deeply disappointed” with the Egyptians, who seem to have endorsed the Israeli and American standpoint according to which the Palestinians should return to the negotiating tables unconditionally.

Abbas, he added, was “shocked” when he heard that Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, had agreed with Clinton that the peace negotiations should be resumed without preconditions.

Abbas was quoted by the aide as having accused the Egyptians of “failing to keep their promise to support his demand that Israel halt all construction in the settlements as a prerequisite for the resumption of the negotiations.
Azzam al-Ahmed, a senior Fatah official who also serves as an adviser to Abbas, said that he and his colleagues were working hard to persuade the PA president to participate in the elections.

Ahmed said that there was a consensus in Fatah that Abbas was the most suitable candidate to run in the presidential election, “because he enjoys the backing of the Palestinian people.”
He said that Fatah leaders were scheduled to hold a series of meetings in Ramallah this week to discuss the repercussions of Abbas’s move.

Hafez Barghouti, editor of the PA mouthpiece Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, said that any other leader in Abbas’s place would have resigned a long time ago. “The president’s decision should not be seen as an escape from national responsibilities,” Barghouti explained. “Instead, it’s the product of the absence of an international will to find a peaceful and just settlement after 16 years of negotiations, blood and tears.”

http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/?p=167
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 09:15 AM   #229
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default US gives approval to Iran nuclear power plants!



http://www.warisaracket.org/shahsnuclearplants.jpg
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2009, 09:28 AM   #230
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas may quit, leaving vacuum

November 11, 2009

A President threatening to quit, his potential successor languishing in an Israeli jail and a peace process heading nowhere: rarely have prospects for the Palestinian people looked so bleak.

Five years after Yassir Arafat died, his defiant portrait stares down from banners in the streets of Ramallah. While he remains a potent symbol of Palestinian resistance, his successors are characterised more by despair than defiance.

Mahmoud Abbas — popularly known as Abu Mazen — is so frustrated by the stalled peace process that he is refusing to stand for re-election. With no obvious successor, his imminent retirement threatens to unravel the entire Palestinian leadership. There is even talk of the movement being hijacked by the militants who regard talking to Israel as a waste of time.

Mr Abbas cannot resign until after January, the scheduled date of elections, because under the Palestinian constitution he would have to be replaced by the Speaker of parliament. Since Hamas won the last parliamentary elections in 2006, that would mean a Hamas president, giving the Islamists control of the entire Palestinian territory.

Hamas has said that it will boycott the elections, arguing that Mr Abbas’s mandate expired a year ago. He decreed at that time that he would stay on until presidential elections could be held alongside parliamentary polls. Such constitutional gymnastics are likely to continue in the near future, with Hamas and Fatah claiming they are the rightful Government in the probable absence of polls in both Palestinian areas.

A more radical scenario, which some Palestinian officials have raised, envisages Mr Abbas, 74, dissolving the Palestinian Authority, created under the now-defunct Oslo peace accords, and continuing to rule in his capacity as the head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation. Many Palestinian opposition figures have argued that the Authority is a “Vichy government”, legitimising continued Israeli occupation.

The Palestinian leadership finds itself in this quandary because the peace process has run into the sands. President Obama’s efforts to restart talks are stalled by Israel’s refusal to freeze all Jewish settlement growth in the West Bank, and the Palestinians’ insistence that they will not negotiate until settlement building stops.

“Israel always said Arafat wasn’t a partner for peace,” said Rabiha Diab, the Palestinian Minister for Women’s Affairs and a long-time member of Arafat’s Fatah movement. “We see now the Israelis are not partners for peace, they have implemented nothing and the world stands by them.”

Many Palestinians believe that the Israelis poisoned Arafat, who lived out his final years practically under house arrest in Ramallah, and have now crippled his successor by not responding to his peace overtures and renunciation of violence. “Israel killed President Arafat, and now it is trying to kill Abu Mazen’s project at a time that it knows he is committed to bringing peace,” said Mrs Diab.

Mr Abbas’s announcement last week that he would not stand for reelection left observers guessing about his real intentions. Tony Blair, the international community’s envoy to the Middle East, said yesterday that Mr Abbas’s decision to step down was not a political ploy but a reflection of his deep frustration at the absence of any meaningful peace process.

Abdel Nasser al-Najjar, the editor of the Fatah-linked newspaper al-Ayyam, said he thought Mr Abbas was serious about stepping down, though possibly not as soon as January. “There’s nobody at this point who can replace the President,” he said. Given the deep divide between the Hamas-run Gaza Strip and Fatah-led West Bank, he said Mr Abbas would probably delay the elections until June, by which time he might have wrung some concessions out of Israel, under pressure from the US, or have reconciled with the Gaza Islamists.

Mr al-Najjar said that if elections were held now without Mr Abbas, the Palestinians would probably choose a more militant candidate. “Abu Mazen represents moderation, in spite of all the criticism against him,” he said. “The option of negotiations goes out with Abu Mazen, so the people would elect someone else who offers another option,” he warned. The most popular contender to succeed him is Marwan Barghouti, a younger Fatah leader who played a key role in the second Palestinian intifada, which started in 2000. However, he is in an Israeli jail after being convicted of heading a group that killed Israeli civilians.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6911721.ece
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 08:50 AM   #231
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default Pelosi And Her Zionist Jew Enablers

By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2009



Read on.

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=462
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 09:13 AM   #232
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Isreal Part 1



Isreal Part 2

__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 09:23 AM   #233
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Israeli Terrorism Against America?? INCONCEIVABLE

Published November 11, 2009



Quote:
What? What?? Whaaaaat?!?!?!

No, this can’t be. According to an article appearing in one of Israel’s biggest mainstream news outlets–Haaretz–Israeli Military Intelligence is AT THIS VERY MOMENT trying to “figure out” what went wrong in 1954 with something known as the “Lavon Affair”, described by the news outlet as a “sabotage operation” by Israel in “bombing theaters, post offices and U.S. and British institutions, and making it seem as though Egypt was behind the bombings”.

Ohhhh, this simply can’t be, or as the character Vizzini infamously said over and over again in that adorable movie the Princess Bride– “INCONCEIVABLE”. Israel–the apple of God’s eye–deliberately bomb American buildings with the intention of blaming it on her Arab enemies in order to achieve a desired political outcome? Deliberately put innocent civilian life in jeopardy with an overt act of state terrorism?

She would NEVER do something like this, and especially not to her bestest buddy in da whole-wide woyld, America. After all, the Jews are God’s chosen people, and something like this would be a sin and they–the Jewish people–don’t sin.

In a word–INCONCEIVABLE.

The article in question HAD to have been written by an Islamo-fascist. Yes, his name may be “Amos Harel,” but underneath, where it counts, no doubt he is Abdullah Hadid. There simply can be no truth to this story. It is simply INCONCEIVABLE.

No, what must have happened here in this “Lavon Affair” thing is a case of “mistaken identity”, just like when the Jewish state attacked an American ship the USS Liberty–for 2 hours resulting in 34 Americans being killed. She says she thought the 600 ft long ship with huge antennae dishes was actually an Egyptian horse ferry ¼ the size.

And “mistaken identity” is the only viable explanation here. The Jewish spies involved in this didn‘t know they were in Egypt, didn‘t know they were carrying bombs and didn’t know they were sent to blow up American buildings that would result in dead Americans. Israel would never do something like this to her bestest buddy in da whole-wide woyld, America. After all, the Jews are God’s chosen people, and something like this would be a sin and they–the Jews–don’t sin and so her doing something like this is simply INCONCEIVABLE.

Or like the 1983 US Marine baracks bombings in Beirut that resulted in 241 young Americans being killed as they slept. Ex-Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsy alleges in his book “By Way Of Deception” that Israel knew all about it beforehand and refused to warn the Americans, saying that the general attitude at Mossad was that the Americans were getting what they deserved. He must be an Islamo-fascist as well, because Israel knowing about what was to take place to her bestest buddy in the whole wide woyld and then not letting them know would be a betrayal and Jews betraying people is simply INCONCEIVABLE.

Same with Jonathon Pollard and the 1 million highly-classified documents he stole and then sold to Israel who in turn gave them to the Soviet Union, America’s sworn enemy at that time. It was a case of “mistaken identity”–Pollard didn’t know they were classified and Israel didn’t know she was selling them to America’s enemies and the 1,400 American intelligence assets killed as a result is all an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory because for Israel to betray her bestest buddy in da whole wide woyld is simply INCONCEIVABLE.

And 9/11–all those Mossad agents arrested, some seen cheering at the destruction of the towers and others caught driving vans laden with explosives as they headed towards the George Washington bridge…This all HAD to be a case of “mistaken identity”. They didn’t know it was America, didn’t know they were cheering and didn’t know the van they were driving was loaded with tons of C-4, because for Israel to do something like this, an act of terrorism against America that would then be blamed on her Arab enemies (just like in the Lavon Affair) is simply INCONCEIVABLE…

And all the other things as well–Monica Lewinsky being used by Israel to blackmail President Clinton. The Oklahoma City bombings originally done to blame Iraq. The anthrax letters. AIPAC spying on America. The organ harvesting rabbis, Bernie Madoff, and all the rest. What we see is simply an illusion, because the Jews being up to their eyeballs in something as nefarious as this is not only impossible, but indeed INCONCEIVABLE…

…or at least, that’s how it will all be described form virtually every pulpit in virtually every Christian church in America in the coming days and weeks, provided of course it even gets mentioned at all.

(c) 2009 Mark Glenn

[email protected]
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 09:23 AM   #234
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default The Gaza Holocaust in Pictures!!

A must view!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






Palestinians in Gaza getting roasted to death after Jews dropped phosphorous from the sky during the Gaza Holocaust of December 2008 to January 2009






\]

Please see much, much more here.

http://www.ziomania.com/holocaust/holocaust.htm
http://www.ziomania.com/holocaust/holocaust.htm
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/

Last edited by accuracy; 13-11-2009 at 09:45 AM.
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 10:14 AM   #235
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

UN Official: ‘Penalize Israel Over Gaza’

By politicaltheatricsPublished: November 12, 2009



Citing the Goldstone Report, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay told the Security Council Wednesday that Israel was responsible for the killing of more than 1,000 civilians in Gaza and attacks on schools and mosques and UN facilities.

The US is heading a group of nations in the efforts to prevent a Security Council discussion on the report, which was recently adopted by the General Assembly. “The corrosive effect of impunity on both human rights and peace is evident in the case of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as documented in the report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission headed by distinguished international jurist Richard Goldstone, which has been transmitted to this Council,” Pillay wrote.

“The report lays out in detail the nature and scope of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law perpetrated on the civilian population of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, where in Gaza earlier this year Israeli forces killed well over one thousand civilians and attacked homes, schools, mosques, food and water installations, and UN facilities.”

In a speech delivered by her deputy, Pillay focused on Israel’s activities in the “occupied Palestinian territories”, saying that the siege (on Gaza) and the Israeli offensive in the Hamas-ruled territory constitute a violation of international human rights and humanitarian law.

“Collective punishment, as evidenced by the crippling Israeli blockade and the devastating military offensive, is a violation of international human rights and humanitarian law, as are the forcible evictions of Arabs, the demolition of homes, and the expropriation of occupied East Jerusalem lands for Israeli settlements,” wrote Pillay.

“Mr. President, until meaningful steps are taken to end impunity for these violations and assert the applicability of international law, peace and security will remain illusive for all the people of the region. The Council is urged to embrace the recommendations in the report so as to secure accountability for all perpetrators, and to fully integrate human rights guarantees into peacemaking efforts.”

http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/?p=239
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 08:37 AM   #236
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default Israel's Dark View Of The World

Many Israelis see little need for a peace settlement but feel isolated in what they regard as an increasingly hostile world



Friday 13 November 2009 09.00

The official explained to Bibi Netanyahu that if there was a peace settlement, extra investment would push Israel's long-term growth rate from 5% a year to 7%. The Israeli prime minister responded that if the country had 5% growth, it did not need peace.

Netanyahu was joking, according to the official who recounted the story – but the quip highlights a serious point. There is no prospect of a settlement between Israelis and Palestinians, and many Israelis are fairly relaxed about that. During a recent visit to Israel, I met very few people who were optimistic about the peace process.

Netanyahu says he supports the creation of a Palestinian state. But the terms he is offering – with much of the hypothetical state's security under Israeli control – would not be acceptable to any Palestinian leader. Netanyahu's coalition government shows no signs of offering the Palestinians the kinds of concession – such as freezing settlements – that would make a peace deal possible.

Nor do the Palestinians seem ready for peace: recent attempts to bring both Fatah and Hamas into a national unity government came to nothing. Whether Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, will carry out his recent threat to resign is unclear.

Within Israel, there is very little pressure for a peace settlement. Israelis are getting on with their lives, without – for now – the threat of suicide bombers. There are virtually no rocket attacks from the areas controlled by Hamas and Hezbollah. The barrier that snakes through the West Bank makes Israelis feel safer – and also less interested in what happens on the other side.

As for the Gaza strip, most Israelis do not want to think or talk about it. The only people I met who seemed worried about the situation there were foreign journalists, plus a few Israeli liberals – and Tony Blair, who as a peace envoy keeps telling the Israelis that the people of Gaza need to be "given a way forward". If pressed, moderate Israelis admit to being uncomfortable that their government (like Egypt) will not allow exports out of Gaza or building supplies in (on the grounds that Hamas would profit from any trade).

In Gaza, 40% of adults are unemployed and most of the rest are in government jobs. The West Bank is doing better, with only 20% unemployment and economic growth likely to be 7% this year – partly because Tony Blair and others have persuaded Israel to lift some of the restrictions on movement. Israelis hope that when Gazans see the brightening prospects of the West Bank they will turn against Hamas. In fact Hamas's popularity has waned to some degree since the last Israel-Hamas war, according to people who spend time in Gaza.

Can international pressure kick-start the peace process? Earlier this autumn Barack Obama pushed Netanyahu to accept a freeze on expanding West Bank settlements, but failed. Liberal Israelis say Obama made the mistake of demanding that the freeze should apply to the suburbs of East Jerusalem, which most Israelis do not regard as settlements. Netanyahu's successful resistance to US pressure has made him more popular. Many Israelis view Obama as both hostile and weak; his approval rating is below 10%.

Could the EU, Israel's top trading partner, and the biggest provider of aid to the Palestinian Authority, put pressure on Israel? It was planning to offer an "enhanced agreement" that would establish regular EU-Israel summits, and give Israel the right to take part in a range of EU programmes. But earlier this year the EU said it would hold up the agreement until Israel did more to alleviate the plight of Gaza. This conditionality, which annoys Israel's leaders, might be more effective if the EU increased its offer. Why not tell the Israelis that if they forge a peace deal with the Palestinians, they could join the European Economic Area, giving Israel – like Norway and Iceland – full access to the EU's single market?

But for now, the Europeans' divisions over how to handle Israel weaken their credibility as a partner for it. For example earlier this month, when the UN General Assembly debated the Goldstone report – which had accused Israel of war crimes in Gaza – the EU split three ways: the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands were among those voting with the US to reject the report, Britain and France led a large group of member-states into abstention, and a few others, including Ireland, Portugal and Cyprus, voted for the report.

Many Israeli politicians and businessmen have a dark view of Europe. At a conference I attended in Jerusalem, one minister – a noted dove within the Israeli government – complained about the influence of Muslim minorities on the foreign policies of EU countries. I told him that Germany and the Netherlands, two states with large and vocal Muslim minorities, were among Israel's best friends in Europe. He countered that the Czech Republic and Poland, which had very few Muslims, did not criticise Israel. And he claimed there was a direct correlation between the willingness of British MPs to criticise Israel, and the size of the Muslim minority in their constituencies.

Several Israelis at the conference complained that, having sprung from European civilisation, they were now among its last defenders, given that the high birth rate of Muslim immigrants and Islamist ideology were undermining that civilisation from within (I have heard very similar comments in Serbia and Russia).

Reinforcing the Israelis' gloomy world-view is their fear of Iran's nuclear programme. Many of them urge the West to understand that the real problem in the Middle East is not the question of Palestine but the extremist alliance of Iran, Syria, Hizbollah and Hamas that threatens Israel and moderate Arab regimes.

Israelis have long been worried about Iran. But their fear of Turkey – until very recently a close ally – is new. The Turkish government's criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza and its recent cancellation of joint military exercises makes Israelis fret that Turkey is nestling up to the Iran-led coalition. They worry about the growing power of Islamists in Turkey, the diminishing role of the secular army in Turkish public life, and Prime Minister Erdogan's burgeoning friendship with Iran's President Ahmedi-Nejad. Erdogan's recent comments to the Guardian about the validity of the Iranian presidential election process were unfortunate. But I think many Israelis exaggerate Turkey's eastward tilt. Erdogan is trying to balance Turkey's foreign policy between the EU, the US, Russia, Iran and the Arab world, and that may be in Turkey's best interests.

However, a lot of Israelis seem to believe the worst of Turkey, as they do of many countries. Many of the Israelis that I met see themselves as increasingly isolated in a hostile world.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ace-settlement
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 09:34 AM   #237
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Channel 4 defends Israel lobby probe

By Simon Rocker, November 5, 2009

Channel 4’s flagship investigations programme, Dispatches, is to probe what it calls “one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain” — the pro-Israel lobby.

The political columnist Peter Oborne is to front an hour-long broadcast, Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby, due to be broadcast on Monday week.

The hard-hitting documentary strand has been responsible for such programmes as Undercover Mosque two years ago, which included covert filming of Islamist extremists preaching in British mosques.

According to Channel 4’s official pre-publicity, “despite wielding great influence among the highest realms of British politics and media, little is known about the individuals and groups” who work “in support of the interests of the state of Israel”.


Presenting: Peter Oborne

It says that Mr Oborne “sets out to establish who they are, how they are funded, how they work and what influence they have, from the key groups to the wealthy individuals who help bankroll the lobbying.

“He investigates how accountable, transparent and open to scrutiny the lobby is, particularly in regard to its funding and financial support of MPs.”

The pro-Israel lobby, it adds, “aims to shape the debate about Britain’s relationship with Israel and future foreign policies relating to it. Oborne examines how the lobby operates from within Parliament and the tactics it employs behind the scenes when engaging with print and broadcast media.”

According to a spokesman for the channel, Dispatches wanted “to look at one of the most powerful, but also least transparent lobbying groups in the UK”.

He explained it was “an entirely legitimate area for journalistic investigation, not least in the run-up to an election, where a lobby working in support of the interests of a foreign power could wield great influence in shaping future British policy”. He rejected any suggestion that it had been designed to balance such controversial programmes as Undercover Mosque.

The programme had been commissioned by the commissioning editor for Dispatches, Kevin Sutcliffe, in discussions with production company Hardcash.

Hardcash managing director David Henshaw said the programme was a “conventional political investigation” and “not a conspiracy-theory film”.

It was “not the synagogue equivalent of Undercover Mosque”, he said.

Last updated: 4:42pm, November 5 2009

http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/21...el-lobby-probe
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 09:44 AM   #238
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Hamas Tells Red Cross: Israel Planning Another War In Gaza

Published: November 13, 2009



Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyyeh has warned that Israel is planning another offensive on the Gaza Strip, Iran’s Press TV reported on Friday.

According to Haniyyeh, it is Israel and not Hamas that is intent on keeping the conflict going between the two sides. Hamas is “not looking for more violence,” Haniyyeh told a group of Red Cross delegates visiting the Gaza Strip earlier this week.

The Hamas leader, who was elected to head the movement’s cabinet and took over leadership of Gaza in 2007, told the delegates that he hoped his prediction of war would not come into fruition.

Haniyyeh said that should such an offensive occur, Hamas would be prepared to retaliate. “Our people will not surrender; they will fight back,” Prime Minister Haniyyeh’s office said, in a statement.

He also said he hoped that “the world will stop Israel from killing more children,” according to the Iranian network.

ASHKENAZI: ISRAEL WILL FIGHT IN GAZA AGAIN IF NEEDED
Meanwhile, Israeli occupation army Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi said Friday that the army would not hesitate to respond if Palestinian resistance fighters in the Gaza Strip continued to fire rockets at the occupied territories.

“We are prepared to contend with the whole arc of threats,” Ashkenazi told students during a visit to a Be’er Sheva high school, citing both the local defense situation as well as Iran’s nuclear program.

Although the Hamas rulers in Gaza have of late been “restraining themselves and others,” said Ashkenazi, “we must not fool ourselves. If necessary, we will operate again in the Gaza Strip to stop the rocket fire.”

In reference to the Goldstone Commission’s damning report on Israel’s conduct during the war on the Gaza Strip earlier this year, Ashkenazi emphasized that the Israeli army had the responsibility to defend itself at all costs.

His comments came amid an international frenzy over a UN-commissioned report accusing Israel of war crimes during the January aggression. Israel has denounced the Goldstone report as one-sided and biased. During that aggression, more than 1400 Palestinians were killed; including 420 children and over 5300 others were injured not to mention the severe destruction in the Strip and the displaced that lost their homes.

http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/?p=258
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 09:51 AM   #239
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

GAZA: A GLIMMER OF HOPE

November 13, 2009



Next month the Gaza Freedom March will travel to Gaza on the anniversary of the Israeli assault in solidarity with Palestinians in the territory. (Hatem Omar/MaanImages)


The Obama Administration proved twice recently that it intends to continue to consider Israel above the law. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton caused consternation amongst the US’s allies in the Palestinian Authority and across the region by declaring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s intention to “restrict” settlement activity in the West Bank “unprecedented.” Netanyahu’s restriction restricts very little. Three thousand housing units that are already approved will be built. Netanyahu announced plans for building a new settlement in Jerusalem, Ma’aleh David, while settlers continue their violent assault against Palestinians, intending to expel them from the city. Last week, settlers invaded a Palestinian house, backed by a court order. The US responded with a statement calling Israel’s moves “unhelpful,” but did nothing to stop them.

If Obama’s first message to the Palestinians as elected president went to those living in the occupied West Bank — as president-elect he was quiet during Israel’s winter invasion of Gaza — the second was to the families of the thousands of victims of that three-week attack. Last week the US voted against a UN General Assembly resolution to endorse the findings of the Goldstone report, which calls for Israel and Hamas to investigate allegations of war crimes. Hamas accepted the report. Israel, which killed 1,417 Palestinians, 926 of them civilians, including 437 children, according to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, did not. The US consented to Israel’s disapproval and initiated a campaign in the UN to discredit the report. The facts in the report remained unchallenged.

The US House of Representatives condemned the report as “one-sided and distorted.” In a letter to the sponsors of the resolution, Judge Goldstone pointed out gross “inaccuracies” in the resolution. It is probable that most of those who voted for the resolution, sponsored by the powerful lobby American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), did not read the 575-page report. What’s called “support for Israel” in Congress has achieved the status of a sacred cow. Dissent comes only at significant political cost, and inevitable smear campaigns by the pro-Israel lobby. Notwithstanding these facts, 36 representatives opposed the resolution, and 22 abstained, signs that the lobby’s control of Congress may be cracking slightly. In contrast, the House was almost unanimous in its support of the Israeli offensive in January.

The US has a long history of vetoes to protect Israel from accountability. During the Nixon presidency, in 1972, the US first used its veto power in the Security Council to protect Israel. This was its second veto overall, preventing the passing of a resolution that would have condemned Israel for the killing of hundreds of civilians in air raids against Syria and Lebanon. The US has since used its veto power more than 40 times to give Israel a free hand to commit atrocities against Palestinians and the region’s peoples.

Bush Administration Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, defending the US’s refusal to support a cease-fire during the 2006 assaults on Lebanon and Gaza, said that “It is time for a new Middle East, it is time to say to those who do not want a different kind of Middle East that we will prevail; they will not.” The “new Middle East” that Rice was referring to is one where Israel can continue to occupy the land of millions, kill thousands and kidnap hundreds, all the while running roughshod over human rights and international law.

Susan Rice, the Obama Administration ambassador to the UN, is scarcely distinguishable from the other top diplomat sharing her last name. She said in an interview with The Washington Post that the Goldstone “mandate was unbalanced, one-sided and unacceptable.” She justifies this statement by claiming that it was “85 percent oriented towards very specific and harsh condemnation and conclusions related to Israel.”

Yet, even if Judge Goldstone had wanted to dedicate an equal number of pages to both sides, there is only so much one can write about the three Israeli civilians killed by Palestinian fighters, or of the holes punched in roofs by the home-made projectiles. The difference in power, Israel’s status under international law as an occupying power, and the catastrophe that befell a besieged population that had nowhere to flee (unprecedented in modern warfare) suggest nearly indisputable grounds for substantiating the allegations of “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity.” Moreover, all that the report asked for were credible investigations and prosecution for those found to merit it. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Daniel Ayalon said that Israel arrived at a “silent understanding” with the Obama Administration that a veto will be applied if there are attempts made to put the report before the Security Council following the UN General Assembly vote.

But there is a glimmer of hope that the people of Gaza will see justice. The massacre brought about sweeping change, across the world, in perceptions of Israel. Citizen-led mobilizations in the past few months have showed that where governments have failed, ordinary citizens can, perhaps, make a difference. Even in the US, where public support for Israel has been consistently high, a discourse supporting justice for Palestinians is now voiced in mainstream media. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was met with a frigid reception in a series of lectures around the country, with audience members interrupting constantly, calling for his immediate arrest. Moreover, there are signs that opposition to AIPAC’s dominance within the Jewish American community is gaining strength.

The movement for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) called for by Palestinian civil society in 2005 has also gained momentum, as the Norwegian government has divested from Elbit Systems as a result of its role in the construction of the apartheid wall. Last month, an Israeli deputy prime minister was forced to cancel a trip to the UK for fear of arrest. He has since announced that he will forgo all trips to European capitals.

And while the world’s most powerful governments cavil over making Israel comply with international law, their citizens do not. Some of them — some of us — are taking up the banner of the international nonviolent struggle, staying loyal to principles of human rights and international law, following the wishes of the Palestinian people. In December, we will march in solidarity with the Palestinians living imprisoned in Gaza. In December, the Gaza Freedom March will attempt to lift the siege of Gaza, as we commemorate the one-year anniversary of Israel’s invasion. From 29-31 December, we will move through Rafah and Khan Younis and Gaza City, the length of the Strip, with a host of luminaries including Alice Walker and Walden Bello. On 31 December, we will march to the threshold of the Erez crossing. The peoples of nearly every continent will be there, in Gaza, demanding that the world take action, that the leaders of the world recognize their peoples’ solidarity with the Palestinian struggle, and recognize the inhumanity of the siege, and end it. Punishing a people in this way is not only illegal. It is wrong. It is time to make it stop.

Ziyaad Lunat is one of the organizers of the Gaza Freedom March (www.gazafreedommarch.org) and an activist for Palestine. Max Ajl is also one of the organizers of the Gaza Freedom March and blogs on the Israel-Palestine conflict at www.maxajl.com.

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/200...immer-of-hope/
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 10:10 AM   #240
accuracy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 13,766
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default



A very nice website!

http://www.gazafreedommarch.org/arti...=type&type=416

http://www.gazafreedommarch.org/arti...=type&type=416
__________________
As a Premier Subscriber, i enjoy David Icke's newsletters.

Australians For Palestine.(Providing a Voice.)
http://australiansforpalestine.com/
accuracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.