Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Lawful Rebellion / Non Compliance / Sovereignty

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25-10-2010, 08:26 PM   #1
benny54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Robert Menard - Disassociated from Canada?

A first: Man been "disassociated" from Canada by the Supreme Court of B.C., - not a 'terrorist', still a free man, just no longer allowed to "legally" defend himself in their courts, have access to due process or make claim for damages in commerce for himself or anyone else

A man who goes by the name Robert-Arthur: Menard, creator of ThinkFree and a strong freedom and human rights supporter, who the Supreme Court of British Columbia refers to as "Robert Arthur Menard of North Vancouver", has been prohibited from appearing in their courts and having due process, in addition to preparing documents for others present in court and even operating normally in everyday commercial transactions.

This occurred as he has fallen out of "good standing"

with the Law Society of British Columbia after previously successfully challenging their assumed lawful authority.

They have decided, without due process,

that he is prohibited from...

(a) appearing as counsel or advocate;


(b) drawing, revising or settling a document for use

in a proceeding judicial or extra-judicial;


(c) drawing, revising or settling a will,

deed of settlement, trust deed, ...;


(d) drawing, revising or settling a document

relating in any way to proceedings
under a statute of Canada or British Columbia;


(e) doing any act or negotiation in any way

for the settlement of,or settling,

a claim or demand for damages;

etc.

...effectively barring him from operation in society,
including the proper use of commerce;
the right to a claim or demand for damages regarding
the use of commercial instruments,
legal tender and accounts,

and with utility companies and other businesses

for simple services in everyday commerce.

This move is a first by the Supreme Court and
the Law Society for any man in Canada

and has surprised other supporters of freedom

and human rights who have questioned how
the Law Society can make such claims

to disassociate a man from society.

He is barred from challenging it, even though he has

only just found out about the order,

and he is barred from preparing

the documents for my his own challenge.
He has not found to have done

any thing unlawful, only to have fallen

out of "good standing".

The Order stands "until such time as he becomes a member in good standing of the Law Society of British Columbia".
[THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER REGISTRY NO. S073719]

Download the original PDF here.

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source...d2i_Pg&cad=rja



Someone want to help me understand what exactly this means?
benny54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 08:38 PM   #2
jeff_bloomfield
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

It means he is both a Martyr to the Freeman cause and he is also f**ked.

What can he do now?
__________________
The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only one in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred millions to a poetic or divine life.To be awake is to be alive. I have never yet met a man who was quite awake. How could I have looked him in the face?
jeff_bloomfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 08:40 PM   #3
angelthecat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 5 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by benny54 View Post
with the Law Society of British Columbia after previously successfully challenging their assumed lawful authority.
After this section is read it means that the rest is BS as they have admitted that they have no authority over him. In effect he has become an out-legal as he has agreed to operate within the law he can not be an outlaw.

if it is true Well done Rob you have proof that freemanship is above fictional statute's and still within the law
__________________
no politicians were hurt in the making of this war
http://www.davidicke.com/forum overcome the hypnosis
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

Government of this Church to continue without any Alteration to the People of this Land in all succeeding Generations [this was the creation of the UK Government 1706 act of union]
angelthecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 08:42 PM   #4
scottishryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 901 (419 Posts)
Default

Very very interesting indeed!!
__________________
We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively

My NEW Book (Paranormal): https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unseen-Worl...A0DXGPP2JGAGHG
scottishryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 08:49 PM   #5
lizardlover
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: At The Lounge
Posts: 648
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

This is old news. All it means is that the BC courts were sick of seeing face filling stupid papers trying to act like a wanna be lawyer for every dingbat with a parking ticket who didn't want to pay it and tried the freeman escape.

He can defend himself in court, there is nothing in the legal documents from the case stating that, only he can't act as council for others or give legal advice or pretend he knows anything about the law. Quit stretching the facts.
lizardlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 08:51 PM   #6
rumpelstilzchen
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the End of The Forest where the fox and the hare bid each other goodnight
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

It's an old case.
Basically it is to prevent Menard acting as a lawyer, because he isn't one.
rumpelstilzchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 09:51 PM   #7
scottishryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 901 (419 Posts)
Default

Tag team to the rescue

http://ryangrammatico.files.wordpres...7/warriors.jpg
__________________
We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively

My NEW Book (Paranormal): https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unseen-Worl...A0DXGPP2JGAGHG
scottishryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-10-2010, 09:57 PM   #8
bones
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in my body
Posts: 5,140
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottishryan View Post
hahhaha the two ronnies... i just call em fuk tards.
bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 12:34 AM   #9
kadmonprime
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Well, I assume regardless of this--Mr. Menard is still capable of buying and purchasing goods and powering his home somehow isn't he?
kadmonprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 12:37 AM   #10
freedavep
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Isn't this the order that rob had overturned ? You know the one that he talked about at the begining of Rob's Very Cunning Plan.

I think he refers to it being overturned or something in his "Bolton" series on youtube. (It seems nobody was willing to point the finger directly at his physical self as the "person" (there's that word again) the order affected.

Rob might clarify this for us perhaps.
freedavep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 01:46 AM   #11
lizardlover
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: At The Lounge
Posts: 648
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedavep View Post
Isn't this the order that rob had overturned ? You know the one that he talked about at the begining of Rob's Very Cunning Plan.

I think he refers to it being overturned or something in his "Bolton" series on youtube. (It seems nobody was willing to point the finger directly at his physical self as the "person" (there's that word again) the order affected.

Rob might clarify this for us perhaps.
It was never overturned. On the BC law page they used to show all the documents filed in the case. It showed every step of the entire case and the last document filed by the courts was the judgement in the first post, nothing after that showing anything overturned.
lizardlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 01:47 AM   #12
brianthebrain
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedavep View Post
Rob might clarify this for us perhaps.
I doubt it, he has NEVER clarified any thing else, dont suppose he will start now
brianthebrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 02:37 AM   #13
freedavep
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I think this might be the order that the OP was referring to....... @7:05 and onward.


Although you guys are looking for some hard physical Proof I guess ??

Speaking of the "Bolton" series.......this one has one of the best Q and A from Rob.


Last edited by freedavep; 26-10-2010 at 02:43 AM.
freedavep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 03:31 AM   #14
brianthebrain
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freedavep View Post

Speaking of the "Bolton" series.......this one has one of the best Q and A from Rob.

http://www.youtube.com/user/mrmitee#p/u/86/grKSxrMKs0c
jeez what are the worst like ten mins of rob rambling on about nothing much , what a $$$$pot
brianthebrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 08:58 AM   #15
rumpelstilzchen
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the End of The Forest where the fox and the hare bid each other goodnight
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lizardlover View Post
This is old news. All it means is that the BC courts were sick of seeing face filling stupid papers trying to act like a wanna be lawyer for every dingbat with a parking ticket who didn't want to pay it and tried the freeman escape.

He can defend himself in court, there is nothing in the legal documents from the case stating that, only he can't act as council for others or give legal advice or pretend he knows anything about the law. Quit stretching the facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumpelstilzchen View Post
It's an old case.
Basically it is to prevent Menard acting as a lawyer, because he isn't one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottishryan View Post
What's the problem, fifer?
Don't you accept our explanations?
rumpelstilzchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 09:03 AM   #16
rumpelstilzchen
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the End of The Forest where the fox and the hare bid each other goodnight
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bones View Post
hahhaha the two ronnies... i just call em fuk tards.
Well, let's face it, bones, that input is just about all you're capable of. Debating isn't exactly your forté is it?
rumpelstilzchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 09:35 AM   #17
snake plisskin
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Why doesn't a freeman study and become a proper lawyer and then when they are fully qualified start using the freeman stuff, the courts won't be able to ban them as they will be fully trained and the arguments put forward by the said lawyer will have to be tested in court?
snake plisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 09:53 AM   #18
rumpelstilzchen
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the End of The Forest where the fox and the hare bid each other goodnight
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snake plisskin View Post
Why doesn't a freeman study and become a proper lawyer
What, spend all of those years learning law when they have all they need at the click of a button on youtube?
Quote:
and then when they are fully qualified start using the freeman stuff,
Perhaps when qualified they would realise that the freeman stuff has no basis in law?

Last edited by rumpelstilzchen; 26-10-2010 at 09:55 AM.
rumpelstilzchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 11:36 AM   #19
scottishryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 901 (419 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumpelstilzchen View Post
What, spend all of those years learning law when they have all they need at the click of a button on youtube?

Perhaps when qualified they would realise that the freeman stuff has no basis in law?
Assumption and opinions Your good at them old buddy!!
__________________
We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively

My NEW Book (Paranormal): https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unseen-Worl...A0DXGPP2JGAGHG
scottishryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2010, 11:54 AM   #20
rumpelstilzchen
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the End of The Forest where the fox and the hare bid each other goodnight
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottishryan View Post
Assumption and opinions Your good at them old buddy!!
Tell me, fifer do you ever actually contribute anything concerning the topic of the threads in the fotl section or is your purpose just to analyse and criticise other people's posts?

Last edited by rumpelstilzchen; 26-10-2010 at 12:07 PM.
rumpelstilzchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.