Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2010, 03:10 PM   #1
biblegirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 6,462
Likes: 5 (4 Posts)
Default "Flu Shots For All" This Year, Purely Experimental

It totally grosses me out to see signs posted all around grocery stores advertising flu shots. Why they administer these poisonous shots in the middle of a place that sells FOOD is questionable at best. It seems like a disgusting combination, shopping in an area where people are getting injected. Anyway, here is everything about Flu Shots from Dr. Mercola. Includes some important information especially about pregnant women who are encouraged to get the shot when studies have not even surfaced about how it may affect them or their babies. Shady stuff. I highlighted the most important parts .

Quote:
Flu Shots for All (Science Optional)

For the past several years, physicians in America have been insisting that every child age 6 months to 18 years must get an annual flu shot. Making matters worse, health officials have now ramped up those recommendations, telling EVERY person over the age of 6 months get a flu shot, healthy or not, low risk or high.

Everyone. Three hundred million of you, every year from the year you are born until the year you die.


What will receiving lifelong flu shots every year do to your immune system?

With all of those vaccinations, will you be more susceptible to influenza-related complications and death?

We really don't know.

Health officials have leapt ahead with recommendations of "flu shots for all" without safety studies—so by getting a flu shot, you are effectively offering yourself up as a laboratory rat. In other words, YOU are the safety study!

No Mystery -- These Flu Vaccine Side Effects WILL Occur in the US

It isn't just an ordinary flu vaccine they are promoting this year—it's the new trivalent vaccine, which may be even more reactive than the monovalent. This vaccine is a three-in-one, containing influenza A, influenza B, and 2009 pandemic swine flu (H1N1) strains.

Administering this highly suspect formulation to 300 million people has potentially disastrous implications. Red flags were already popping up last year, and this flu season has raised many more.

Australia's flu season precedes ours, so we can look to them for a preview of vaccine issues. By June of 2010, more than 1,000 adverse reactions in children under the age of 5 resulted in the Australian government's banning of flu vaccines for that age group. High fevers, vomiting and convulsions were the most widely reported reactions, which are also associated with long-term adverse health outcomes.

CSL's Fluvax appears to be the main troublemaker. However, CSL has objected to being singled out, claiming any of the other three vaccines on the Australian market could be to blame.

Just like last year where the experience in Australia with the swine flu was replicated precisely in the US, you will see the same happen this fall, winter and spring in the US. This is entirely predictable as is the lack of media coverage that this will receive.

Interestingly, the Sydney Morning Herald recently reported that Australian "public health experts have called for an independent body to monitor drug safety after it emerged that young children were more likely to end up in hospitals because of side effects from a flu vaccine than they were from the disease itself. The analysis contradicts government safety advice that the harm did not outweigh the risk and raises concerns about the Therapeutic Goods Administration's assessment of the vaccine."

Mark my words, the US will have the identical experience, and nine months from now you will see in the newspapers that children given the flu vaccine were more likely to wind up hospitalized than from those that actually got the disease.

These drug manufacturers have a horribly unethical track record with disturbing manufacturing errors. Many of the drugs remain indemnified from damage.

H1N1 Vaccine Continues To Provoke Reports of Serious Side Effects

In the meantime, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 "swine flu" vaccine that has been put into this year's trivalent seasonal flu vaccine continues to be associated with lots of reports of devastating reactions:

In Finland, France and Sweden, narcolepsy was reported in teenage children in response to Pandemrix monovalent swine flu vaccine, leading the Finnish government to suspend its use.
In Korea, nearly 2,600 swine flu vaccine side effects were reported as of August 2010, ranging from allergic reactions to fevers to headaches—and including 10 deaths.

Children are not the only ones who seem to react more violently to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 component.

According to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a special government committee has been created to investigate last year's H1N1 monovalent vaccine for signs it may be associated with more adverse reactions. What the committee found out provisionally is there were three signs of trouble with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine used last year.

Fisher outlined these three primary health concerns in a recent NVIC video update:

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disease which has been associated with influenza vaccine since 1976, when the swine flu vaccine was first used. In fact, British government health experts acknowledged the link between the H1N1 vaccine and an increased risk of GBS earlier this month. Prior to this public admittance, the government had always denied such a link
Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), an autoimmune disorder, is a blood clotting disorder characterized by insufficient platelets
Bell's palsy, a reaction causing temporary facial paralysis
Why are people having these worrisome reactions?

Vaccines Wreak Havoc With Your Immune System

All vaccines are immune suppressive—that is, they suppress your immune system, which may not return to normal for weeks to months. Here are just some of the ways vaccines impair and alter your immune response:

Some components in vaccines are neurotoxic and may depress your immune and brain function, particularly heavy metals such as mercury preservatives and aluminum adjuvants
The lab altered vaccine viruses themselves may further impair your immune response
Foreign DNA/RNA from animal tissues can wreak havoc in your body and trigger autoimmunity in some people
Vaccines may alter your t-cell function and lead you to become chronically ill
Vaccines can trigger allergies by introducing large foreign protein molecules into your body that have not been properly broken down by your digestive tract (since they are injected). Your body can respond to these foreign particles in the form of an allergic reaction
The flu vaccine may also pose an immediate risk to your cardiovascular system. One 2007 study published in the Annals of Medicine concluded that:

"Abnormalities in arterial function and LDL oxidation may persist for at least 2 weeks after a slight inflammatory reaction induced by influenza vaccination.

These could explain in part the earlier reported increase in cardiovascular risk during the first weeks after an acute inflammatory disorder."

Add to all those factors the immune-compromising effects of excess sugar in the average American diet, plus inadequate exercise and other lifestyle factors, and you've created the perfect setup for health problems far worse than influenza..

So the tradeoff you are making is TOTAL immune system depression (your defense against millions of pathogens) for temporary immunity against ONE infectious disease—in this case a few of the many viral strains of influenza—and that immunity is questionable.

Do you really want to trade in temporary immunity to a few strains of influenza for autoimmune disease or even cancer?

A Special Warning to Seniors!

For seniors, this season's flu vaccine may be one of the most dangerous you've ever experienced, because seniors will likely get a vaccine that is FOUR TIMES as potent as that given to the rest of the population, as recently reported by the Chicago Tribune.

In the ACIP Provisional Recommendations for the Use of Influenza Vaccines, dated February 24, it states:

"A higher dose formulation of an inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose, manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur, licensed by FDA on December 23, 2009) for use in people age 65 years and older will be available in the 2010-11 influenza season.

"Fluzone High-Dose contains four times the amount of influenza antigen compared to other inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. …

Studies are underway to assess the relative effectiveness of Fluzone High-Dose compared to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine, but results from those studies will not be available before the 2010-11 influenza season." [Emphasis mine.]

So, if you're age 65 or older, the CDC wants you to take a flu vaccine this fall that not only contains an antigen they previously said you probably already have antibodies to (H1N1), but that is also four times as potent, with no safety evaluation whatsoever until AFTER the season is underway!

This is madness. Seniors are already a group that can withstand the harmful effects of this vaccine the least...

Again, the CDC is asking you to be a part of a large public health experiment, which is why we're warning you.

Is the Vaccine Safe for Pregnant Women? Nobody Knows!

If you are a pregnant woman, you and your unborn child may be the most defenseless of all potential vaccine casualties in the national infuenza vaccine experiment.

Barbara Loe Fisher states she is very concerned about the issue of pregnant women getting flu shots because of the lack of scientific data about the effects of this vaccine—particularly the H1N1 component—on pregnant women and their unborn babies.

She states:

"Last summer the NIH announced they were doing studies in children, adults and pregnant women with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine. About 120 pregnant women were supposed to be enrolled in a study in early September… We have yet to see any announcement of the results of those studies."

And without any scientific evidence about safety, are you supposed to blindly accept that flu vaccines are safe for you and your unborn child?

Here's another startling fact making this year's vaccination policy even more unconscionable.

Flu vaccine has now been officially listed as a Category C drug.

What does this mean exactly?

Category C is for drugs that do not have enough human or animal studies to establish safety, OR adverse fetal effects have been seen in animal studies but there is little human data.

According to FDA:

"Category C drugs are drugs that are more likely to cause problems for the mother or fetus. Also includes drugs for which safety studies have not been finished. The majority of these drugs do not have safety studies in progress. These drugs often come with a warning that they should be used only if the benefits of taking them outweigh the risks.


If you are a pregnant woman, your doctor may be pressuring you to get a drug that is not approved for you! This is just idiotic.

Thimerasol-containing vaccines are considered hazardous waste and can't be thrown into a garbage can, poured down a sink or flushed down a toilet because of the mercury—they're considered environmentally toxic. Yet, they want to inject them into your baby?

Why would anyone, pregnant or otherwise, want to be injected with a substance that is too toxic to dispose of down a drain?

Evidence-Based Medicine Flushed Down the Drain: FLU SHOTS DON'T WORK

Not only do flu shots weaken your immune system, expose you to toxins, and cause allergies and other adverse reactions, they don't work.

Yes, you read that correctly. Besides being fraught with complications, flu vaccines simply don't work to decrease flu incidence or flu mortality. Flu vaccinations keep coming up short in study after study—way short—when it comes to having any measurable impact on what matters most, which is reducing illness and mortality from the flu.

After the largest flu-vaccination campaign in Canadian history, a Canadian-led study (through the Cochrane Collaboration, a highly respected international network of researchers who analyze the scientific evidence, including the methodology, used in clinical trials) concluded that vaccinating nursing home workers had no effect on confirmed influenza cases among the homes' elderly residents.

Lead researcher Dr. Roger Thomas explained:

"What troubled us is that [shots] had no effect on laboratory-confirmed influenza. What we were looking for is proof that influenza ... is decreased.

Didn't find it.

We looked for proof that pneumonia is reduced. Didn't find it. We looked for proof deaths from pneumonia are reduced.

Didn't find it."

In fact, in April of 2010, Michael Osterholm, director of the national Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), publicly admitted that flu shots don't work in the elderly.

One factor that may explain this is the "healthy user" effect.

Lisa Jackson's "Healthy User" Effect

Lisa Jackson, a physician and senior investigator with the Group Health Research Center in Seattle, found that healthy people tend to choose flu vaccination, while the "frail elderly" didn't or couldn't. Her research suggested that flu vaccine itself does not reduce mortality at all.

Healthy (and health-conscious) people tend to get the vaccine AND come down with flu less often, not because of the vaccine itself but because they are healthier to start with.

Jackson concluded:

"The reductions in risk before influenza season indicate preferential receipt of vaccine by relatively healthy seniors... the magnitude of the bias demonstrated by the associations before the influenza season was sufficient to account entirely for the associations observed during influenza season."

Unfortunately, Jackson's papers were turned down for publication in the leadiing medical journals.

If You Think You Have the Flu, the Odds are Five to One You Don't

You may not be aware that only about 20 percent of flu-like illnesses are actually caused by influenza type A or B, according to CDC. The other 80 percent are caused by more than 200 other bugs that can make you feel just as sick - respiratory syncytial virus, bocavirus, coronavirus, and rhinovirus, to name a few.

Every day you're around viruses and bacteria, and when you're healthy, you usually don't get sick. But even if you do get sick, most healthy adults and children will not have a problem with influenza.

If you do come down with influenza and have a good immune response, you will likely quickly recover without serious complications, as well as obtain natural immunity to that strain of influenza and to similar ones.

Respiratory infections statistically increase with age as the average person's immune system generally weakens. When a person over age 65 dies of respiratory failure after a flu-like illness, their cause of death is nearly always labeled as influenza even if it is actually due to bacterial pneumonia.

The vaccine industry loves to attribute many deaths in the elderly to influenza because it pumps up the influenza mortality statistics and helps make a case for use of influenza vaccine.

But you have to die of something, and dying of respiratory viruses is quite common. Just remember this when reading flu mortality statistics: very few deaths from respiratory illnesses are actually caused by type A or type B influenza. viruses

You Could Already Be Immune to the Flu!

Vaccine-acquired immunity is temporary, whereas the immunity you get by recovering from influenza is longer lasting. Look at Baby Boomers, for example. Evidence shows, if you are an aging baby boomer born prior to 1957, you are more protected and have a lower risk for pandemic H1N1 influenza that circulated in 2009 and other related influenza strains.

Why?

Because you have long-lasting antibodies that help you resist influenza, antibodies that you acquired by recovering from similar strains of influenza in past decades. Unfortunately, if public health officials and drug companies marketing vaccines have their way, your children and grandchildren won't be allowed the opportunity to develop this important natural immunity to type A and type B influenza strains.

So the question is this: why do we continue doing something that has been proven ineffective many times over? As the saying goes, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results."

The real way to prevent the flu is through optimal lifestyle and nutrition, and getting plenty of vitamin D, lowering stress and getting the right amount of sleep and Western medical science has glossed right over that.

Tom Jefferson is a physician based in Rome and the head of the Vaccines Field at the Cochrane Collaboration. Jefferson leads an international team of researchers who have combed through hundreds of flu-vaccine studies and have concluded the majority of these studies are "deeply flawed."

Jefferson states:

"Rubbish is not a scientific term, but I think it's the term that applies... We have built huge, population-based policies on the flimsiest of scientific evidence. The most unethical thing to do is to carry on business as usual."

I couldn't agree more.
...
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...e-effects.aspx

Last edited by biblegirl; 01-11-2010 at 03:11 PM.
biblegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 03:19 PM   #2
armoured_amazon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 21,303
Likes: 312 (143 Posts)
Default

Fuck flu shots!
armoured_amazon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 08:43 PM   #3
christ4life
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 17 (9 Posts)
Default

Same with Walgreens they always are usually first to post a sign up. If I trusted doctors like most of these people probably do then why would I want a shot at a drug store. Doesn't seem like something I would trust either. It is kind of gross considering your buying food at these places. What is odd about it is there is not a pandemic, and this is something you can do in a doctors office. They oviously are making it more convienient for people who won't go to a doctor to make sure more people get the shot. Makes you wounder what will happen to these people who get the shot. Whenever possible I try to tell people they shouldn't get it.
christ4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 09:00 PM   #4
blue2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: On a Superhuman Planet
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 90 (63 Posts)
Default

You don't need vaccines-i had one flu vaccine once only and it nearly killed me back in 85' it gave me viral pneumonia which led on to chronic fatigue syndrome ME or so i was led to believe for 16 yrs of wasted life hardly able to keep awake and weak with child to care for....i found it had made my Thyroid underactive 16yrs later, i now take Armourthyroid and never been near a doctor since 1995 for any drug or any infection-

I self treat and make my own medicine for flu which is this One cup Raw Unpasteurised Honey to one cup Aspalls Organic Cyder Vinegar,the golden one, and supposed to be a whole bulb of raw garlic but you can put four or five cloves crushed into it then Blend and put into glass jar or bottle and refrigerate-i use a washed glass coffee jar. It keeps a week but you use it several times daily although one teaspoon on empty stomach each morning, just sip it gently do not gulp it down !! squeeze red grapefruit fresh along with fresh squeezed orange and add teaspoon of medicine into it and drink sipping gently.

I have been known to use Hydrogen Peroxide Food Grade 35% diluted down to 3% in water which means 3-4 drops in large glass water....no flu bug would live in that and OxyT which is oxygenated Magnesium. It's Minerals we need for health even Ionic or Angstrom... See David Favor of radicalhealth.com

Last edited by blue2; 01-11-2010 at 09:01 PM.
blue2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:21 PM   #5
aee02
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 198
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Thanks for the post biblegirl.

The company I work for had a health fair this weekend. They were giving out free flu shots. You couldn't imagine the peer pressure to get one. I told them I had other obligations and could not stay for the health fair. I got out of it.

That was last week. Over the weekend and today many of my co-workers are out sick or have said they do not feel good. I used to hear of one or two people having reactions to the shot but never this many (half of my own department). Um, no shot, thank you. Hopefully I can keep avoiding the pressure to get one.

Thanks again.
aee02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:31 PM   #6
biblegirl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 6,462
Likes: 5 (4 Posts)
Default

Good for you aee02, I know it can be a headache refusing these things. And obviously it is an oxymoron for many reasons, to have "flu shots" at a "health fair". The hospital here had 80% of the doctors and nurses on staff refuse the flu shot this year! So you are not alone. All flu shots are terrible. But this new, untested, 3-in-1 flu shot sounds like the worst one yet!

By the way I just remembered another venue used for the flu shot that was thoroughly inappropriate. It was advertised here last year that you could get your flu shot AND cast your vote to elect the new president, at the same time! They literally set up injection booths across from the voting booths! It seemed pretty evil .
biblegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:43 PM   #7
aee02
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 198
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biblegirl View Post
By the way I just remembered another venue used for the flu shot that was thoroughly inappropriate. It was advertised here last year that you could get your flu shot AND cast your vote to elect the new president, at the same time! They literally set up injection booths across from the voting booths! It seemed pretty evil .
Wow. I wonder which kills you faster, the shot or the vote..lol.. You have to laugh its too freakin' scary.
aee02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2010, 11:47 PM   #8
aee02
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 198
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by christ4life View Post
Same with Walgreens they always are usually first to post a sign up. If I trusted doctors like most of these people probably do then why would I want a shot at a drug store. Doesn't seem like something I would trust either. It is kind of gross considering your buying food at these places. What is odd about it is there is not a pandemic, and this is something you can do in a doctors office. They oviously are making it more convienient for people who won't go to a doctor to make sure more people get the shot. Makes you wounder what will happen to these people who get the shot. Whenever possible I try to tell people they shouldn't get it.
Yeah, the Walgreens near my place has the gi-normous, electronic, eyesore, sign about the flu shot. I know some of these Pharmacists and they didn't want to do it either. They pretty much said the same thing.
aee02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 02:59 AM   #9
grimgate
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I've created a petition that is targeting this. We could use the extra signatures and anyone else you may know that would be willing to sign it.
grimgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.