Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15-11-2008, 08:29 PM   #1
banoyes
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default "It was like a bad special effect"

Even Fairbanks talks about his video

stop this one at 1 sec .. fast clidk..watch building heal itself


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rig-Aipu_Yo
]
so you can stop it

here is another


This is what it flew through -as if it was no more then a cloud

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=86c_1190219877

Last edited by banoyes; 15-11-2008 at 09:28 PM.
banoyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2008, 09:13 PM   #2
citroen999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

plane flies through tower, but cant fly through pentagon...

hmmm... i smell fake shit some where

possible NPT but dont tell the others or they will be on here like a shot saying i'm mad
__________________
I refuse to tiptoe quietly through life to safely arrive at death!!

There are 2 sides to every story and then there's the truth!!

If i left you alone in the woods with only a hatchet how long before you could send me an email?
citroen999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2008, 10:41 PM   #3
graflok
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

^ Oh, I think they'll be along very soon regardless.
__________________

graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2008, 11:00 PM   #4
beldazar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall UK
Posts: 19,423
Likes: 22 (19 Posts)
Default

Yup! Hold on to your hat....
__________________
The most beautiful piece of music I have ever heard.
George Carlin and Bill Hicks at their very finest!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sipD...layer_embedded
beldazar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 02:54 PM   #5
qasrose
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedom is Now
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

That Even Fairbanks video, is awesome.
and just shows you that a plane really did
hit those towers on that day.

The thing that strikes me is. Because
someone says "It was like a bad special effect"
You assume that he is saying his own footage is FAKE.

And another thing, How come out of
all the videos online, The so called Chopper 4 footage is
the only video that features no plane?. It really makes you think wonders.

PS: This is not an argumentative post, it is a general Question.

Last edited by qasrose; 16-11-2008 at 06:02 PM.
qasrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 02:57 PM   #6
nessa felagund
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London (with my guy) :)
Posts: 7,650
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

I just wanted to let you know that I have split this thread and moved the posts regarding the peace sign to a new thread in symbolism. Here is the link:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=42817

Please go here for further discussion of this topic.

Cheers!
nessa felagund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 03:03 PM   #7
qasrose
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedom is Now
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

I also want to add this video

If this is not proof enough, then I don't know what is.

From The X-Files spin off show, The Lone Gunmen

qasrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 05:39 PM   #8
banoyes
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

These are two videos that show Flight 175

Above the smoke


The straight in

and what happens to the wings??
banoyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 06:09 PM   #9
qasrose
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedom is Now
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banoyes View Post
These are two videos that show Flight 175

Above the smoke
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucT4-Q2gd9A


The straight in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV7KNO-1mdw

and what happens to the wings??
Thanks for posting those two videos, Banoyes.

Is that 2nd Video a new one, as I've not seen that
before. And it seems to show what all the other videos
show of the 2nd impact. But you have to understand
that the camera is really far away. and it used the zoom
function, Are you saying the wings should have come off
before the plane crashed through the buildings???

Because the plane is going fast, and it would
just go straight into the building, that is why
you see the explosion inside because it connects
with the structure. Which caused the plane to Blow.

I'm glad we can have a nice chat, instead of a
argumentive one Banoyes It makes me Happy.

I also love that first video, too.
I think that also proofs that it wasn't a
Boeing Jet, but another aircraft made
to look like a Boeing. Just my Opinion.

Last edited by qasrose; 16-11-2008 at 06:13 PM.
qasrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 06:14 PM   #10
lightgiver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Inactive
Posts: 36,483
Likes: 237 (190 Posts)
Default Did planes hit the towers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasrose View Post
That Even Fairbanks video, is awesome.
and just shows you that a plane really did
hit those towers on that day.

The thing that strikes me is. Because
someone says "It was like a bad special effect"
You assume that he is saying his own footage is FAKE.

And another thing, How come out of
all the videos online, The so called Chopper 4 footage is
the only video that features no plane?. It really makes you think wonders.

PS: This is not an argumentative post, it is a general Question.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/fairbanks/

http://911logic.blogspot.com/2007/05...ory-under.html

http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

Last edited by lightgiver; 16-11-2008 at 06:21 PM.
lightgiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2008, 06:25 PM   #11
qasrose
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedom is Now
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Thanks for posting those links, Lightgiver.

I'll have a better study of them when I'm off work
I'm still standing on my plane theory, but will have
a read through those sites. and let you know my thoughts.
qasrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 06:36 AM   #12
demise_of_time
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 356
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I always thought it was quite possible that the planes really where there, but where still remote controlled at the same time. I remember a lot of information regarding how the plane looked fake, no windows w stuff strapped to the bottem etc. Well, what if the remote controlled plane(s) were made of a lighter material since they weren't really "real", but just life size? This would also account for the plane not fully penetrating the building; it would just fall apart inside the building so debris wouldn't go too too far out and evidence could quickly be colleceted and the scene blocked off.
__________________
"Hypnotic state of reality
Offering gifts through which you'll see
The secrets kept from humanity
and secrets they will always be..."
demise_of_time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 06:45 AM   #13
qasrose
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedom is Now
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demise_of_time View Post
I always thought it was quite possible that the planes really where there, but where still remote controlled at the same time. I remember a lot of information regarding how the plane looked fake, no windows w stuff strapped to the bottem etc. Well, what if the remote controlled plane(s) were made of a lighter material since they weren't really "real", but just life size? This would also account for the plane not fully penetrating the building; it would just fall apart inside the building so debris wouldn't go too too far out and evidence could quickly be colleceted and the scene blocked off.
Not that I am debunking your theory, but it
would be impossible to remote control a Boeing
at that speed and doing those turns. etc.
qasrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 07:08 AM   #14
demise_of_time
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 356
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasrose View Post
Not that I am debunking your theory, but it
would be impossible to remote control a Boeing
at that speed and doing those turns. etc.
That''s what I'm saying! What if the planes were remote control models made of a lighter material; one that would be more easily controllable than an actual plane?
__________________
"Hypnotic state of reality
Offering gifts through which you'll see
The secrets kept from humanity
and secrets they will always be..."
demise_of_time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 11:07 AM   #15
adsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demise_of_time View Post
That''s what I'm saying! What if the planes were remote control models made of a lighter material; one that would be more easily controllable than an actual plane?
That is a also a good point but judging by the stabalized video of the plane flying through the building asif it was a cloud, that wouldnt happen if the plane was of lighter material withought the slightest crumble.
adsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 04:26 AM   #16
matrix911
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banoyes View Post
Even Fairbanks talks about his video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq6Y4vasVbI

stop this one at 1 sec .. fast clidk..watch building heal itself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rig-Aipu_Yo


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rig-Aipu_Yo
]
so you can stop it

here is another
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCVwuf_AMFs


This is what it flew through -as if it was no more then a cloud

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=86c_1190219877

One of the best video doc's putting things in a very well articulated context is SEPTEMBER CLUES... everyone should see this. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
matrix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 06:13 AM   #17
graflok
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 8 (6 Posts)
Default

A 110-story building supposedly struck near its top by over 3 billion foot
pounds of kinetic energy yet the building does not appear to budge one
inch
! A building that was known to sway in the wind yet we cannot see
any movement whatever of the building upon "impact" in any video from any
angle.

Oh, some witnesses said there was some sway at some point during the event
but with all the video footage that exists there is no visible evidence of any
movement at the moment of "impact."

Three billion foot pounds is the energy expended lifting 3 billion pounds one
foot straight up. Imagine the effect if it were directed sideways against the
tower near its top.

__________________


Last edited by graflok; 18-11-2008 at 06:20 AM.
graflok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 10:34 AM   #18
mr_pixie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
just shows you that a plane really did
hit those towers on that day.
mr_pixie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 10:50 AM   #19
mynameis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,549
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by graflok View Post
A 110-story building supposedly struck near its top by over 3 billion foot
pounds of kinetic energy yet the building does not appear to budge one
inch
! A building that was known to sway in the wind yet we cannot see
any movement whatever of the building upon "impact" in any video from any
angle.

Oh, some witnesses said there was some sway at some point during the event
but with all the video footage that exists there is no visible evidence of any
movement at the moment of "impact."

Three billion foot pounds is the energy expended lifting 3 billion pounds one
foot straight up. Imagine the effect if it were directed sideways against the
tower near its top.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq6Y4vasVbI
Are you implying that a sway of the building would be captured on video? If so that would be quite remarkable given the size of the structure involved. This would be like trying to detect movement of an aircraft carrier deck bobbing on the ocean from video. It's highly unlikely this would be measurable or detectable with the human eye.
__________________
I can no longer have fair and intelligent conversation with people here, without them resorting to the use of personal attacks. I have been targeted as a scapegoat for my defensive actions. I cannot discuss new topics and stop the rampant amounts of misinformation when it happens, where it applies. If it can happen to me it can happen to you.
mynameis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:18 AM   #20
banoyes
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mynameis View Post
Are you implying that a sway of the building would be captured on video? If so that would be quite remarkable given the size of the structure involved. This would be like trying to detect movement of an aircraft carrier deck bobbing on the ocean from video. It's highly unlikely this would be measurable or detectable with the human eye.
Newton Laws were suspended that day ..action-reaction did not apply
The building never reacted in any way to being struck..just opened up and let the plane fly entirely inside
banoyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.