Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > OPEN FORUM: Information share

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2019, 11:35 AM   #441
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Technocracy creeping in...

Australia Inserting Nano-Chips in $50 & $100 Bills to Track Underground Economy & Coming Barter System
Posted Jan 3, 2019 by Martin Armstrong

While the BitCoin people have hated me for not agreeing with them that a private currency could displace the currencies of all nations and BitCoin would be the new “reserve currency” killing the dollar, to me they are in serious need of help. They have ZERO comprehension of governmental power and ZERO understanding of what is going on behind the curtain. The IMF has come out and stated that each nation should issue their own cryptocurrency and these fools cheers claiming I am not with it and do not get this new age of technology. Sorry, but these people are really clueless if not perhaps undercover people with a mission to get people willing to surrender their final liberty – paper money.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/a...barter-system/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 10:33 AM   #442
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

The folks at zero hedge have posted two anti-trump pieces today. Looks like it is the globalists playing 4D chess not trump, or rather that trump is part of that game. Here's a summary of them:

Brandon Smith: Trump Is A Pied Piper For The New World Order Agenda
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 23:05

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

In my last article, 'The Fed Is A Suicide Bomber With A Deeper Agenda', I explored and dismantled recent propaganda surrounding the Federal Reserve's tightening actions, including the propaganda that Jerome Powell is some kind of rogue central banker who is rebalancing the system for the good of the nation.
To summarize the points made in that article:

The Fed deliberately created the "Everything Bubble" so that it could be deliberately imploded at the proper time - in other words, the crash we have been witnessing so far during the final quarter of 2018 and continuing into 2019 is a controlled demolition of the economy. Jerome Powell is not some "rebel" going against the easy money dictates of the Fed. Jerome Powell is playing the role that has been given to him. Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen's job was to inflate the bubble. Jerome Powell's job is to crash the bubble.

This is a tactic used by the Fed and the globalists that run it for over 100 years - conjure a debt bubble, deflate the debt bubble, cause a crisis, siphon up hard assets for pennies on the dollar, use the panic to gain more power and centralization, introduce new control measures while everyone is distracted, rinse, repeat.

This process of controlled demolition needs a considerable distraction so that the central banks and the globalists ultimately avoid blame for the painful consequences of the event.

Enter Donald Trump and the false Trump vs. Globalist paradigm.

In terms of social control, elitist con men are highly preoccupied with preventing spontaneous organization of rebellion. But this does not always involve the outright crushing of dissent. Instead, the elites prefer to use co-option and misdirection (con games) to lure rebellious movements to focus on the wrong enemy, or to trust the wrong leadership.

The most effective method for the establishment to sabotage a rebellion is to place one of their own puppets into a leadership position in that rebellion. This exploits the movement’s subconscious appetite for top down leadership. It neutralizes activists by tricking them into waiting for orders from on high instead of acting on their own individually. It makes a movement lazy and impotent.

In my article ‘Clinton vs. Trump And The Co-Option Of The Liberty Movement,’ published in September 2016, I noted:

“To summarize, the elites need a patsy for the breakdown of the financial system they have engineered. That patsy will not be Trump per se, but conservatives in general. Whether Donald Trump is aware of this program or not, I do not know. I have no hard evidence indicating that Trump is anti-constitution; then again, I don’t have much evidence indicating he is pro-constitution. All I have at present to go by is his rhetoric, and rhetoric counts for nothing.

What I do know is that triggering a fiscal crisis under the watch of Trump and blaming conservatives is far more useful to the elites than triggering a crisis under Clinton and risk blame falling on international banking syndicates.”

In the meantime, the globalists can slowly kill the world reserve status of the dollar while avoiding the blame for the severe economic consequences this will produce. A conflict between the White House and the central bank will be presented as a sign that faith in U.S. debt and the longevity of the dollar is a bad bet. Foreign holders of dollars and T-bills, already quietly dumping these assets, will accelerate the decoupling. Trump’s trade war activities add to the distraction, creating a brilliant theater in which conservatives are conned into supporting a puppet leader on the verge of collapse, and confirming the crazed arguments against conservative principles in the minds of globalists and leftists.

The con game is to get liberty advocates to invest themselves fully in Trump, to the point that we end up owning every mistake he makes, and every disaster that is pinned on him. There is a concerted propaganda campaign targeting the liberty movement which is telling us that Trump is playing “4D Chess;” that Trump is planning a “coup” against the banking elites, that Trump is planning to bring down the Fed as a means to save the U.S., and even that Trump is working with Jerome Powell to crash the globalist system as a means to “restore the Republic.”
The activists and alternative media are the real heroes. They are the people that pushed liberty philosophy into the mainstream. Trump merely rode the wave that they created. Even if he was a legitimate conservative and constitutionalist (which he is not), the movement doesn’t need his leadership. It never did. The globalists know this and hope to chain us to Trump as he sinks into historical oblivion, destroying us all in the process.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...d-order-agenda


Monetary Policy 'Reset': From Rhetoric To Actuality
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 21:45

Authored by Steven Guinness,

A resurgence in nationalistic tendencies has been predominately associated with the advents of Brexit and Donald Trump’s presidency. But have these outcomes meant that we now neglect to give due consideration to the years that preceded the supposed breakdown of the ‘rules based global order‘?

It was in Davos at the 2013 World Economic Forum – three years before the UK voted to leave the European Union – that IMF head Christine Lagarde warned an audience of bankers and economists of the dangers of renewed protectionism:

If we look at openness, and we see that the situation is improving, you can be absolutely sure that nations will revert to their natural tendency of hiding behind their borders, of moving toward protectionism, of listening to vested interest and will forget about transcending those national priorities. It is not the way to go.

Of paramount importance, according to Lagarde, was the removal of barriers, particularly in terms of global trade. By observing the climate in the present day, trade has become a central pillar of geopolitical disorder in the manner of ‘Trump’s Trade War‘ with China and the potential for supply chains between the UK and the EU to be compromised in the wake of Brexit.

In 2014, Lagarde returned to Davos to speak to delegates about something she called ‘reset‘. Keep in mind at this point that the world was still over two years away from Brexit and Trump’s ascension to power. There had yet to be any discernible rise in what is today characterised throughout the media as ‘populism‘.

Sharing a platform with Bank of England governor Mark Carney and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, Lagarde explained what this reset would entail in regards to monetary policy.

We see as necessary going forward a reset in the area of monetary policies. We believe that quantitative easing and the accommodating monetary policies that have been adopted should be continued up until such point that growth is well anchored in those economies.

Once it is well anchored then those accommodating policies have to be reformulated, have to move either back into their old territories or be more traditional, or be, maybe, of a different kind.

Nearly five years after Christine Lagarde first spoke of the need for a ‘reset‘ of global monetary policy, three of the most influential central banks in the world are all engaged in the practice, albeit at varying speeds.

The ‘reset‘ of monetary policy works primarily as a vehicle for the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements to position themselves as the beneficiaries of the inevitable economic downturn that will ensue.

As I will be exploring in an upcoming series of articles, the IMF are agitating to reform their quota subscriptions (the institution’s prime source of funding) and in turn the weighting of their Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket of currencies.

Conditions in the global economy – namely rising trade protectionism that pits the United States and China into economic conflict – has put the world reserve status of the dollar in increased jeopardy. For the IMF to achieve their goals, the dominance of the dollar as the payment of choice throughout global trade must not only be jeopardized. It must ultimately be dismantled, so as to gradually move the world nearer to the globalist utopia of assimilating national currencies through the SDR with the aim of creating a digitised global currency.

I believe that China’s inclusion in the IMF’s SDR basket in 2016 – just weeks before Donald Trump was chosen as the next U.S. president – marked the next significant stage of this process.
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles...cial-committee
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 12:21 PM   #443
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
Political Correctness

The absurdity of the term 'political correctness' should be clear to anyone with any common sense as clearly there would have to be an agreement on what was correct politically and yet in our society there is no consensus.

What we do have is el-ite bankers dictating down through the media and education system which they control what they deem politically correct according to their global-communist agenda. So anything that advances their agenda is deemed 'politically correct' and anything that goes against their agenda is outlawed as 'politically incorrect!' and there are of course penalties for people who step out of line as if you disagree with their agenda then you are deemed an 'extremist'

One tentacle of political correctness seems to be 'NORMALISATION' which is to say the push through the media and education system, backed up by the legislators and judiciary to pretend that unnatural things are normal in order to prevent anyone speaking out publically about them and thereby getting people to re-examine those areas of life and consider the source of the changes

So for example there is a push to 'normalise' transgender issues but if endocrine disrupting chemicals are indeed being put out into the biosphere by the corporatocracy and if they are in fact impacting on peoples health, fertility and gender then that would not be a natural occurance and therefore people should have a right to speak out publically about that so that society can then take the necessary steps to prevent any further harm being caused to the health of society. However by 'normalising' changes the PC brigade prevent anyone from speaking out against the changes being imposed on society because if you speak out you are an 'extremist' who is spreading 'hate'

Another area would be mass immigration with anyone questioning the sense of unchecked immigration of unvetted people being branded all kinds of nasty names. Another PC buzzword is 'tolerance' but what this really means when we put it through the Orwellian double speak translator is that we must tolerate the changes that are being forced upon us and our society and we must treat those changes as normal so that we do not speak out against them

'Diversity' is another PC buzzword and its real meaning is the genocide of a target population through various means including mass orchestrated immigration. The end goal of course is not to have eal 'diversity' but rather to enslave everyone under a single central authority which would then impose a single mono-culture and religion on everyone. So these words are all orwellian double speak

What we are being asked to be 'tolerant' of is our own destruction
''Consistent exposure to propaganda is known to break down resistance. Psychologists call the tactic of normalisation through exposure and repetition ‘The Mere-exposure effect.’ This theory postulates that individuals develop preferences largely through familiarity.''
http://commentcentral.co.uk/bbc-bias...blic-violence/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 12:55 PM   #444
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

The Green new deal with the AI demon: Climate change and the transhuman tyranny
Posted on December 5, 2018 in A.I./TRANSHUMANISM

The 2018 UN climate change summit opened this week with a dire warning that today’s generation is the last that can prevent catastrophic human caused climate change, as well as the first to be suffering its impacts. No where does their statement mention that today’s generation is also the last that can prevent our catastrophic immersion and integration with Artificial Intelligence and 5G, despite the fact that a rogue AI catastrophe is more humanly devastating and above climate change in terms of extinction level threats. This is because both climate change and AI solutions are not about ‘saving’ humanity. They are about ‘improving’ humanity by controlling our minds and actions via AI implants (taking away our stupidity and what sovereignty remains) in the name of transitioning into a “modern” eco-friendly “smart” “green” global civilization.

Everyone agrees that humanity can be better, more just (even righteous). Everyone wants a zero carbon, zero poverty, and especially, zero point energy future and a healthy planet for our children and future generations. Leading scientists say we have 12 years to radically transform our economy and society to avoid climate disaster.

The question is, how do we go about it?

At the heart of climate change and transhumanism conversations/agendas is the understanding that humans and our “break shit” (Silicon Valley’s rallying cry) impulses are the problem on this planet.

There are too many of us and too many of us are using old and stupid technologies like fossil fuel powered cars. Governments could ban the old cars (along with plastic bottles and bags) tomorrow to save the planet. Why are they not doing it ?

Transhumanists believe Artificial Intelligence can fix us. We should replace the old corrupt, imperfect, out of control and ‘stupid’ humanity with a new technologically augmented, ‘smart’, controlled and perfected version.

In fact, as AI champions like Elon Musk say, in order to survive the AI “demon”, as he calls it, we will have to ‘get smart’ and merge with machines.

By ‘smart’ is meant wired to the Internet of Things through implanted technology laced together by 5G networks whose radiation is dangerous, if not lethal. I have discussed the potential deadly harm of 5G elsewhere.The connection speed it provides is mandatory for implantable devices like Musk’s Neural lace to work.

None of the ‘world leaders’ who are concerned about climate change seem to care about or grasp the significance of how man will harm every living thing on the planet by unleashing increasing levels of radiation via 5G and how potentially dangerous AI is for the bodies and soul of humanity.

In fact, these same leaders propose 5G and the implantation of Transhuman smart devices it allows as the solution to climate change!

Please don’t laugh. This is deadly serious.

AGENDA 2030

The UN’s only concern about AI is how fast it can use it to implement its Agenda 2030.

Look it up. Depending on whose take you read Agenda 2030 is either a path to global enslavement or a path to freedom for the world’s enslaved in a socialist utopia.

Either way the transformation is forced. The UN intends for a socio-economic political movement that forcibly changes every aspect of human civilization through AI intervention and governmental control of everything via technology.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has called artificial intelligence “a new frontier” with “advances moving at warp speed.”

“Artificial Intelligence has the potential to accelerate progress towards a dignified life, in peace and prosperity, for all people,” said Mr. Guterres. “The time has arrived for all of us – governments, industry and civil society – to consider how artificial intelligence will affect our future.”

He’s right. A very few of us are prepared for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its blurring of our biological selves with our digital selves.
http://www.williamhenry.net/2018/12/...human-tyranny/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 02:08 PM   #445
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Must see....this guy really lays it all out very clearly:

The Truth About 5G - Dr Graham Downing

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 11:47 AM   #446
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

why are voters on the left not noticing what war mongers leftwing politicians have become?

Since when did we support imperialism?

The link to make sense of this is to realise that what is called 'the left' by the corproate media these days is really controlled at the top by the zionists. Communism v's zionism is a false division. Both are controlled at the top by the rothschild cabal

Leftist politicians supporting war in the middle east are working for the zionist enterprise

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 02:14 PM   #447
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Political Correctness

The cabal has pulled together a coalition of angry people and unleashed it against society in order to balkanise the western public and to divide and rule them. They have poured poison into their ears and cash into their bank accounts.

To gay people they have said 'wage war against heteronormative society'
To trans people they have said 'wage war against cis gendered society'
To women they have said 'wage war against men'
To black people they have said 'wage war against white privilege' (ie what white societies have managed to achieve)
To liberals they have said 'wage war against gun owners and christians and white males'

There IS a picture here

However I think we can also say that they have whispered into the ears of right wingers: 'wage war against muslims'

It doesn't take a genius to see who the targeted demographics are and to figure out where that is all coming from. These angry and disaffected groups then wage those well financed wars against the target demographics and contribute to the downfall of western civilisation.

By doing so they inadvertantly assist the cabal in their agenda to enslave ALL people under a globalised technocracy where they will ALL be culled through 5G microwaves and other means and will ALL see their liberty and privacy destroyed. Sadly too many of them are too blinded by hate to see how they are being duped into fighting for the cabal who need to remove any demographics who traditionally have resisted centralised control and the elites 'liberal' values like: moral reletavism, pedophilia, mammonism and satanism

David discusses the need of the cabal to shut down free speech in order to prevent people from cracking this process apart to understand it better:

2019 - Use It Or Lose It - The David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 06-01-2019 at 02:18 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 08:38 PM   #448
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Who Runs Our World?
By Richard Hugus | January 4, 2019

Our world is run by oligarchs, the holders of vast wealth from monopolies in banking, resource extraction, manufacturing, and technology. Oligarchs have such power that most of the world doesn’t even know of their influence over our lives. Their overall agenda is global power — a world government, run by them — to be achieved through planned steps of social engineering. The oligarchs remain in the background and have heads of state and entire governments acting in their service. Presidents and prime ministers are their puppets. Bureaucrats and politicians are their factotums.

Who are politicians? Politicians are people who work for the powerful while pretending to represent the people who voted for them. This double-dealing involves a lot of lying, so successful politicians must be good at it. It’s not an easy job to make the insane agenda of the powerful seem reasonable. Politicians can’t reveal this agenda because it almost always goes against the interests of their constituents, so they become adept at sophistry, mystification, and the appearance of authority. For example, wars for Israel have been part of the agenda of the powerful for years. Since 2001, wars for Israel have been sold as “the war on terror” and lots of lies had to be made up as to why the war on terror was a real thing. The visible faces promoting the war on terror were neoconservatives in the US, almost all of whom were advocates for Israel, or Zionists. Zionists are not the only members of the oligarchy, but they seem to be its lead actors.

With this perspective we may judge all kinds of world events, such as the many false flag terror attacks which have been perpetrated in one country after another to bring about political objectives. False flag attacks range from Operation Gladio to demonize leftists, 9-11 to demonize Arabs and Muslims, and the shooting down of the MH-17 airliner to demonize Russia. Under an atmosphere of terror, with citizens clamoring for revenge, all kinds of political goals can be achieved.

Propaganda is also vital. Control of information through a likewise controlled media has facilitated mass brainwashing. To control the narrative, whistle blowers and truth tellers must be isolated and destroyed, preferably in the open, so as to warn others away. This is what is happening with Julian Assange.

The attack on Gilad Atzmon is an other example. Atzmon has been a major critic of the role of Jewish political power in our world — not just in Palestine, but all over the western world. When he says “we are all Palestinians” he is making the observation that Europe and North America are being Israelified. For example, some police in the US go for training in Israel, where they learn to view the US public, particularly African Americans, the way the Israeli military views Palestinians — as enemies to be shot in the streets and abusively treated. In the US, people are not allowed to question or discuss Jewish power, when it is evident that AIPAC, the lobby for Israel, completely controls both houses of the US Congress. We recall the members of Congress giving Benjamin Netanyahu 29 standing ovations during his denunciation of Iran in 2011. In Britain, mass insanity has taken hold, at least in the media, in the demonization of Russia via the Skripal affair and Luke Harding’s MI6 journalism in The Guardian. This is taking place solely because of Russia’s thwarting of Israel in its attempt to destroy Syria. For the neocons, the agenda is always war — the stick to bring recalcitrant states in line with the New World Order. This behavior is so dangerous that it would be crazy if we did not speak about who is doing this, and why.
https://alethonews.com/2019/01/04/who-runs-our-world/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 06-01-2019 at 08:38 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2019, 04:44 PM   #449
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Rise of the robots: Nearly 9 million British jobs could be lost to AI by 2030 with workers in retail, manufacturing and business administration most at risk

Excl: In total 8,820,545 posts could be wiped out across the UK by robots
Automation is expected to sweep across retail and manufacturing industries
Minister Alok Sharma said UK is creating jobs which can weather march of AI

By Kate Ferguson, Senior Political Correspondent For Mailonline
Published: 17:40, 6 January 2019 | Updated: 19:16, 6 January 2019

Nearly nine million British jobs are at risk from robots, with those working in retail, manufacturing and business support services most at risk, figures reveal.

The rise of Artificial Intelligence is expected to see current jobs wiped out across a wide range of sectors as automation becomes cheaper than humans.

In total 8,820,545 posts could be wiped out by 2030, with retail workers at the biggest risk, according to Department for Work and Pensions figures given to MailOnline.

They are followed by manufacturing and then business administration and support services, where workers are also at high risk from automation.

But ministers said regions across Britain are taking on the challenge posed by the robots head on by creating jobs which are at lower risk from AI.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-AI-2030.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 04:29 PM   #450
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Normalisation of flu vaccines by the holywood progressives...

Breaking: Golden Globes freaks out stars giving them “flu shots” during live show (VIDEO)
Posted by Erin Elizabeth | Jan 6, 2019



Perhaps because Sunday, Jan. 6 is deep into that fake ass flu season they try to indoctrinate us into, at the 2019 Golden Globes hosts Sandra Oh and Andy Samberg gave out flu shots — or did they? While we still don’t know if the shots during the show were real and actually given out at the Beverly Hilton, stars looked genuinely freaked out by the segment that occurred between award announcements.
RELATED STORY:

Did a military experimental vaccine in 1918 kill 50-100 million people blamed as “Spanish Flu”?

It all seemed to happen so fast, just like an actual flu shot. During the Golden Globes broadcast, Oh and Samberg said they wanted to do a down-to-earth segment in which themselves and the celebs in the audience seemed totally normal — just like us. In the past, award shows have done this with food gags, like giving out sandwiches (as Jimmy Kimmel did at the Emmys one year) and ordering pizza (as Ellen DeGeneres famously did at the Oscars). Oh and Samberg decided to go one step further and offer flu shots while chanting, “Shots! Shots! Shots!” to the tune of the LMFAO song of the same name.

Were they making a jab at the jab (as one reader put it) or is it a flu shot promo?
https://www.healthnutnews.com/breaki...ve-show-video/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 05:53 PM   #451
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Post truth world

In this clip ben shapiro points out the trend for people on the fake left to put their narrative above the truth

They claim the moral high ground in order to justify their lies or as he puts it they believe "Feelings Don't Matter About Your Facts."

This has certainly been my experience debating with progressives who seem to believe that 'social justice' is the use of any means at your disposal to gain supremacy over a target population. They clearly have no desire for any sort of 'equality' at all.

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 06:00 PM   #452
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Why we must defend those who dare to speak about the ideology of Jewish supremacy
By Nahida Izzat | Aletho News | December 26, 2012

Forbidden words, taboo topics, witch hunts, smear campaigns, excommunications, thought-policing and book banning are no longer the trademark of fascists and right wing extremists, the profession is shared now by Jewish “anti-Zionists,” alleged “friends of Palestine.” We are left watching in astonishment and disbelief as some “anti-Zionists” are doing the work of hyper-Zionists the likes of ADL and BoDoBJ.

I have recently witnessed the ostracizing and excommunication of two activists, Paul Eisen and Gilad Atzmon, by my local group affiliated to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) using the Zionist method of character assassination of using the labels “racist” “anti-Semitic” as a method of muffling truth.

Yet, among the numerous intellectuals and political activists that have publicly defended Atzmon are many Jews for whom I have only high praise and have expressed much admiration.

It seems that those who wish to stifle discourse are acting as controlled opposition. They attempt to block intellectual discussion, suppress academic freedom, obstruct rational and scholarly debate, filter vital information and smother serious research that examines three main identifiable problems:

The problem of the ideology of Jewish supremacy

The problem of global Jewish-Zionist networking and lobbying

The problem of idolizing the holocaust (which is used as a tool to further Zionist aims)

In 2009, soon after the Gaza massacres, by sheer coincidence I came across the word Neshama. Curious, I googled the word, and lo and behold a Pandora’s Box opened before my eyes; a new learning curve began; I learned about a group called Chabad Lubavitch. I was horrified to discover the supremacist ideology at the core of this group and the level of influence accomplished by the Rebbe and his followers.

Horror-struck, I started investigating, studying then writing about two main issues; the supremacist ideology and the high influence of this prominent organization, attempting to alert our Jewish PSC allies to the danger of such ideology and influence… only to be faced with utter silence.

The problem of the ideology of Jewish supremacy

First; if we accept that Zionism is defined by the crime of genocide and the ethnic cleansing of a nation and has caused the wiping out of a country, then investigating the motivation behind such crime is essential to fight it and hopefully to defeat it. Without unfiltered scrutiny, we would never know who we are dealing with and how to stop them.

Second; supremacism in Jewish ideology is not above criticism; like every other ideology, it should be transparent, accessible and not kept secretive. Without unfiltered scrutiny we would never know what animates Zionists to act with such aggravated cruelty and sadism.

Third; to accuse of “anti-Semitism” and “racism” those who expose Jewish supremacy, is the equivalent of covering up the ideology behind the crime and dissuading people from learning about it, hence challenging and fighting this form of racism.

Dismissing such supremacist beliefs as irrelevant and obsolete would be a huge mistake because these views are the very motor that charges, motivates and energizes the Jewish settlers in Palestine, and gives them the sense of entitlement to do what they do without feeling any guilt or remorse.

For us Palestinians and for our supporters in the solidarity movement, it is a matter of extreme importance to inspect and scrutinize the ideology that motivates and animates the Jewish settlers in our occupied Palestine in order to better understand it, hence combat it. Restricting our understanding of the occupiers, their ideology and mindset cripples our ability to fight back against them knowledgeably and effectively. Furthermore, in our day and age, racism has become outlawed, when people learn about the extent of the ideological racism in the Zionist entity, it will enable us to fight them in their weakest point, thus, bring the day of our liberation closer.

The problem of global Jewish-Zionist networking and lobbying

First; when we look at Zionism as a crime, again, then logically we must identify and investigate the modus operandi. Failure to do so would leave us unable to understand how our oppressors operate and succeed.

Second; with regards to the Jewish-Zionist lobby: investigative work that examines information, no matter how well concealed, and attempts to identify at least some of the culprits and the real criminals behind the fearmongering, the endless wars and the catastrophic conditions that our world suffers is neither racist nor anti Semitic.

Third; devoid of proof or evidence for their false accusations the controlled opposition gate-keepers insidiously filter information through intimidation and by labeling anyone who dares to divulge vital facts. They disable Friends of Palestine (FoP) members from understanding the animus and the methods used to install and to perpetuate the criminal Zionist project, in particular the global network of collaborators who organize and effectively manipulate world policies by coercing world governments into continuous support of the Zionist project in spite of its growing inhumanity.

Expecting to become myself sooner or later a victim of such smear and filtering activity, I always utilize extensive links to primary sources I quote, mostly Jewish organizations. The network formed by these organizations involves large sections of Jewish communities worldwide, and its ultimate role is generally to support the Zionist entity, by inserting themselves in influential positions.

Suppression of inquiry amounts to a dynamic protection system (by peripheral concealment) of the global Zionist network.

Lite-Zionist critics of Israel are attempting to impose on FoP their restrictive dogma, i.e. that a majority of Jews worldwide, whether Zionist “diaspora” or “Israelis”, are not the manipulators of international policy with regards to “Israel”, but the complacent, docile instrument of U.S. imperialism.

To persist, such dogma imperatively needs, again, to filter out glaring facts such as the over-representation of Jewish-Zionist dual citizens in vital areas of UK-US policy making, or the cross-pollination of racist and supremacist ideology between many Talmudic Rabbis and many Secular Jewish-Zionist Organizations supporting the Zionist project.

The persistence of this dogma also requires strict and repressive censorship and gagging of whomever tries to scrutinize, analyze and discuss the facts, let alone expose them to an audience concerned by matters of equality and humanism, such as FoP and the Palestine solidarity movement in general was supposed to be. That is how and why smear campaigns with killer words such as “anti-Semitism” or “racism” are launched.

At best, such activity on part of alleged “friends of Palestine” is irresponsible. The logical implication of such nonsense, would be that Jewish Israelis, almost all of them serving at least 2 full years in the Israeli army, are just naïve and innocent victims. Thereby, this nonsensical dogma exculpates the notoriously perverted cruelty and psychopathy of the Israeli military’s crimes, up and down the command ladder.

The problem of idolizing the holocaust

First; “Facts” do NOT need laws to enforce or defend them, what they require is research to examine their narrative and correct it for better accuracy and understanding. The denial of these principles will invariably lead to the eradication of the Science of History, and thus cause the blind repetition of more genocides, as we already see in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan… Much like what we see with the cover up and suppression of information about The Truth about 9/11, who benefited and how the event was used to create a climate of hatred and fear which enables the power elite to continue waging wars of aggression and extermination.

Second; without understanding how the holocaust has been used by Zionists, from its onset til this very day, we would continue to succumb to intimidation and give allowances that legitimize and justify the existence of a criminal entity. By insisting on keeping an aura of holiness, uniqueness and exceptionality around the holocaust which would continue to put it above any historical event, preventing researchers from examining how this event has been used, and how it enables our occupier to continue to use it as justification for what they do in Palestine.

The holocaust ought to be studied as a historical event with a historical narrative that has NO sacred or exceptional dimension. The emotional, dogmatic and sacred luggage that has been attached to it has been systematically used and is still used by Zionists to justify and minimize their ongoing heinous crimes in Palestine, as well as the claim of special status with special benefits in their respective countries.

Third; there is absolutely no link -strictly none- between the so-called Holocaust and Palestinians. Nowhere can Palestinians be incriminated in the abhorrent oppression committed by central Europeans against Jews during World War II.

I, as a Palestinian, am not prepared to live in guilt, nor to pay for crimes my people haven’t committed. We refuse to accept and will reject forcibly if necessary, pathologically violent and racist Jewish occupiers.

Military conquest, terrorism, robbery, torture, ethnic cleansing and slow genocide ongoing since the arrival of the first Zionists in Palestine almost one century ago (i.e. before the holocaust) does NOT make someone the rightful “owners” or “co-owners” of my homeland, it makes them abject and violent occupiers.
https://alethonews.com/2012/12/26/wh...ish-supremacy/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2019, 05:29 PM   #453
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

From Facebook To Mind Control - Mark Zuckerberg And The Brain/Machine Interface

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2019, 06:30 PM   #454
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

'There will be two civilisations in Europe – one Christian, one mixed Islamic': Hungary's PM calls for 'anti-immigrant forces' to take over EU and says he'll 'fight' Macron to save his country

Viktor Orban predicted two civilisations divided by religion within Europe
Orban said 'I must fight' French President Emmanuel Macron over immigration
He called for 'anti-immigrant' coup to break Franco-German dominance in May
Dubbed Italy's Deputy PM Matteo Salvini a 'hero' for urging a 'European Spring'

By Ross Ibbetson For Mailonline and Afp
Published: 15:50, 10 January 2019 | Updated: 17:07, 10 January 2019

Hungarian PM Viktor Orban warned of two civilisations in Europe - one Christian, the other mixed Islamic - as he called for an 'anti-immigrant' coup in the EU.

Speaking at a news conference in Budapest, Orban predicted there would be two civilisations, 'one mixed Muslim-Christian in the West, and one traditional European-Christian in Central Europe.'

The nationalist leader called for 'anti-immigration forces' to seize power in May's European elections and said he would 'fight' French President Emmanuel Macron, who he claimed was leading a pro-immigration agenda.

He welcomed a 'Warsaw-Rome axis' as he echoed calls for a 'European Spring' made by the Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini who challenged the 'French-German axis' on Wednesday during a visit to Warsaw.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ht-Macron.html
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2019, 10:19 PM   #455
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

5 Ways Smart Phones Are Dumbing People Down

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2019, 11:38 AM   #456
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Personal responsiblity v's state dependency

when i used to speak about things like 911 truth 10 years ago i was called a 'conspiracy theorist' and a 'tin foil hat nutjob' and all those kinds of things. Now when i debate those same people they don't call me those things. It's like they know that the conspiracy is true but what i'm finding is that they are STILL disagreeing with me!

It doesn't matter how much information i share with them to prove my point they continue to argue with me. This has brought me to a disturbing realisation. Many people are supporting the conspiracy for various reasons

For example there is now a lot of race-based-hate in the west where the marxists have painted a big target on the back of white men. This means that anything that is perceived to hurt white people eg autism from vaccines, austerity from central banking, terror attacks like 911, mass immigration etc etc are all CHEERED by these people

There are also many white leftists who hate white society and are angry for various reasons. Some feel they are unable to achieve in that society for example there are now many disgruntled young people who went to university and got themselves into a lot of student debt and chose to study a neo-marxist subject like 'womens studies' or something and they are now finding that it did not fit them for the world of employment so they have spent a whole load of money on something that is absolutely useless in terms of becoming a useful contributer to society and in gaining gainful employment

So there are lots of angry people around these days and also more and more poverty and poor people will more willingly accept any regressive society if it initially offers them free stuff

This then gets us into a destructive spiral where the more poor and angry people the left can flood into the west the more people there will be willing to accept a technocracy which will ultimately enslave us

This demographic war is about tipping the balance away from responsible citizens able to contribute and build a stable society towards a a society where the majority are poor, disgruntled and crying out for state dependency

The left therefore is waging war against stable families of working people because those people are not dependent on the state and the technocracy wants everyone to be a helpless slave of the state but the technocracy is run by the very same elites who created the poverty in the first place
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 14-01-2019 at 11:38 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2019, 10:22 AM   #457
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Operation Dumb Down Society Complete

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-01-2019, 07:04 PM   #458
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

Marranos Everywhere! Christian Kabbalists and the Conquest of the New World
Submitted by David Livingstone on Fri, 03/02/2018 - 15:00

Invisible College

After fleeing to England, the Rosicrucians were responsible for fanning the Kabbalistic millenarian expectations among the English Puritans about the approach of the Messianic time that became popular in the seventeenth century. A close friend of Oliver Cromwell, Dury was among a number of Puritans who held millenarians expectations, framed by a belief in the imminent conversion of the Jews. As noted by Richard Popkin, the leading scholar of millenarianism, “Since the 1640s in various Jewish and Christian circles, a deep hope had sprung up that great events would occur in the near future. It was believed that the final redemption was at hand. The hope for tikkun, restoration, was widespread.”[46] Ultimately, explains Popkin:

[The millenarians] took seriously the injunction in Daniel that, as the end approaches, knowledge and understanding will increase, the wise will understand, while the wicked will not. They also took seriously the need to prepare, through reform, for the glorious days ahead. Their efforts to gain and encourage scientific knowledge, to build a new educational system, to transform political society, were all part of their Millenarian reason of events. They needed to understand, to construct a new theory of knowledge, a new metaphysics, for the new situation, the Thousand Year reign of Christ on earth, which was to be followed by a new heaven and a new earth. Efforts to accomplish this great end are part of the making of the modern world and of the making of the modern mind.[47]

As Christopher Hill has indicated, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, calculations of the precise date of the end of the world based on the Book of Daniel and Revelation occupied some of the best mathematicians, from Napier in the late sixteenth century, to Sir Isaac Newton at the end of the seventeenth. Consensus agreed that 1260 years should be added to the date the Antichrist established his power, which Protestants took to be the Pope. Various calculations therefore settled on the years 1650-1656 for his destruction, the gathering of the Gentiles, the conversion of the Jews and their return to Palestine. Other estimates offered the year 1666.[4

This belief was so prevalent that Manasseh ben Israel, in his letter to Oliver Cromwell and the Rump Parliament, appealed to it as a reason to readmit Jews into England, saying, “[T]he opinions of many Christians and mine do concur herein, that we both believe that the restoring time of our Nation into their native country is very near at hand.”[51]

A desire to better comprehend prophesies of the end times resulted in widespread interest in Jewish ideas on the subject. Most sought after was the knowledge of Menasseh Ben Israel, the son of a Marrano of Lisbon, who had suffered at the hands of the Inquisition, and had taken refuge in Amsterdam. Menasseh’s alliance with a scion of the Abarbanel family, in whose tradition of Davidic descent he was a firm believer, inspired him with the idea that he was destined to promote the coming of the Messiah. Menasseh’s marriage to his wife Rachel, a granddaughter of the Abarbanel, inspired him with the idea that he was destined to promote the coming of the Messiah. According to family legend, Menasseh's wife was a descendant of King David, and he was proud of his children's Davidic ancestry.[52]

Resettlement of the Jews in England

In 1954, Menasseh Ben Israel met in Belgium with millenarian Isaac La Peyrère and Queen Christina of Sweden, an avid student of the occult. La Peyrère (1596–1676) was a Kabbalistic messianist born into a Huguenot family in Bordeaux, and possibly of Marrano Jewish descent. After reading La Peyrère’s Du Rappel des Juifs (1643), Menasseh rushed back to Amsterdam where he excitedly told a gathering of millenarians at the home of John Dury’s schoolmate and friend, Peter Serrarius, that the coming of the Jewish Messiah was imminent. La Peyrère, who is sometimes regarded as the father of Zionism, argued that the Jews were about to be recalled, that the Messiah was coming for them, that they should join the Christians, and with the king of France rebuild Zion.[59]

La Peyrère also served as secretary to the Prince of Condé. It has since emerged that, in fact: “Condé, Cromwell and Christina were negotiating to create a theological-political world state, involving overthrowing the Catholic king of France, among other things.”[60] La Peyrère also argued that the Messiah would join with the king of France, meaning the Prince of Condé, not Louis XIV, to liberate the Holy Land, rebuild the Temple and set up a world government of the Messiah with the king of France acting as regent. Then the Jews will rule the world from Jerusalem.

John Dury introduced Manasseh to the views of Antonio de Montesinos, who came to Amsterdam to inform the Jews, testifying under oath before Rabbi Menasseh ben Israel of his discovery of a remnant of the Lost Ten Tribes in South America.[61] Simultaneously other reports about the appearance of the Ten Tribes reached Jews and Christians, all this creating an atmosphere of excitement. According to Daniel 12:7, claimed Menasseh, this general dispersion was a necessary precondition for the final deliverance of the Jews. Manasseh therefore wrote a treatise on the Lost Tribes, Esperança de Israel (“Hope of Israel”), in support of the readmission of the Jews into England, and which proved, in his own words, “that the day of the promised Messiah unto us doth draw near.”[62] The tract was immediately successful, being very influential not only during the readmission campaign, but also a decade later when rumors circulated about the return of the Ten Tribes.[63]

Menasseh believed that the Messianic age needed as its precondition the settlement of Jews in all parts of the known world. Fired by this idea, he turned his attention to England where the Jews had been expelled since 1290. Lord Alfred Douglas, who edited Plain English, in an article of September 3, 1921, explained how records of the Synagogue of Muljeim revealed a plot between Menasseh and Oliver Cromwell which culminated in the execution of King Charles—the brother of Elizabeth Stuart—in 1649.[64] Parliament established an interim period of Commonwealth. In 1653, Cromwell terminated both his Parliament and the Commonwealth and, appointed himself Lord Protector.

The Cromwellian government was commonly regarded as a Rosicrucian circle. Samuel Butler (1612 – 1680), in his satire of the Restoration, Characters, tells of “the Brethren of the Rosy-Cross” as having attempted a misguided reformation of “their government.” A character in Butler’s other work Hudibras explains: “The Fraternity of the Rosy-Crucians is very like the Sect of the antient Gnostici who called themselves so, from the excellent Learning they pretend to, although they were really the most ridiculous Sots of all Mankind.”[65] According to Paul Benbridge, Cromwellians also referred to themselves as Rosicrucians, such as Andrew Marvell (1621 – 1678), a metaphysical poet and friend of Milton who sat in the House of Commons.[66]

Menasseh came to England in September 1655 with three other local rabbis, where they were lodged as guests of Cromwell. Cromwell summoned the most notable statesmen, lawyers, and theologians of the day to the Whitehall Conference in December. The chief result was the declaration that "there was no law which forbade the Jews' return to England." Though nothing was done to regularize the position of the Jews, the door was opened to their gradual return.

Cromwell was also closely acquainted with the Marrano merchants settled in London, who formed there a secret congregation, at the head of which was Antonio Fernandez Carvajal. When their group at Rouen had been denounced to the authorities as secret Jews many of them eventually fled to London. All were living nominally as Catholics, attending mass regularly in the Chapel of the French or Savoy Ambassador. They conducted extensive business with the Levant, East and West Indies, Canary Islands, and Brazil, but particularly with the Netherlands, Spain, and Portugal. By forming an important link in the network of trade spread throughout the Spanish and Portuguese territories by the Marranos, their position enabled them to provide Cromwell important information as to the plans both of Charles Stuart in Holland and of the Spanish in the New World.

Cromwell had been moved to sympathy with the Jewish cause chiefly because he foresaw the importance for English commerce of the presence of the Jewish merchant princes, some of whom had already found their way to London. As Richard Christopher Hill explained:

The Jews’ potential usefulness to the development of a forward colonial and commercial foreign policy was an additional reason for English interest in them. As early as 1643 Jews in the Netherlands were said to be financing Parliament. Their command of bullion was enormous; they controlled the Spanish and Portuguese trades; the Levant trade was largely in their hands; they were interested in developing commerce with the East and West Indies. To governments they were useful as contractors and as spies. If the ambitious scheme for Anglo-Dutch union put forward by the Commonwealth in 1661 had come off, then the Jews in the Netherlands would have been taken together with the Dutch colonial empire and its trade. When the Dutch refused to be incorporated into the British Empire, Dutch merchants were to totally excluded from all British possessions by the Navigation Act of 1651. This development made many Jews in the Netherlands—especially those trading with the West Indies—anxious to transfer to London: and it redoubled the interest of the English government in attracting them there. The policy paid off: Jewish intelligence helped the preparations for Cromwell's Western Design of 1655.[67]

The Western Design was a part of the Anglo-Spanish War, a conflict between the English Protectorate of Oliver Cromwell and Spain, between 1654 and 1660. It involved an attack on the Spanish West Indies that was intended to secure a base of operations in the Caribbean from which to threaten trade and treasure routes in the Spanish Main, thus weakening Catholic influence in the New World. In 1655, Cromwell sent an expedition led by Sir William Penn, and General Robert Venables, who invaded Spanish territory in the West Indies with the objective of capturing Hispaniola. However, the assault failed because the Spanish had improved their defenses in the face of Dutch attacks earlier in the century. Despite various subsequent successes, such as an established presence in Jamaica, Cromwell saw the operation as a general failure, and Venables and Penn were imprisoned therefore in the Tower of London on their arrival on England.


Sabbatai Zevi

When Cromwell died in 1658, his despotic legacy fell to his son Richard who did not possess his father’s ruthlessness, with the result that it was not long before Charles II the late king’s son was invited back to rule as King of England in 1660. In that same year, the Royal Society was established and Charles II became its patron. It consisted of a number of natural philosophers around Robert Boyle and the Hartlib Circle. Theodore Haak, who was Comenius’ agent in England and also a refugee of the Palatinate,[68] is credited with having started the meetings which led to its foundation. Another founding member was John Dury’s son-in-law Henry Oldenburg, who met with Menasseh on his visit to London.

As Christopher Hill has indicated, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, calculations of the precise date of the end of the world based on the Book of Daniel and Revelation occupied some of the best mathematicians, from Napier in the late sixteenth century, to Sir Isaac Newton, a member of the Royal Society, at the end of the seventeenth. Newton was committed to interpretations of the “Restoration” of the Jews to their own land of Palestine and spent the remaining years of his intellectual life exploring the Book of Daniel. Consensus agreed that 1260 years should be added to the date the Antichrist established his power, which Protestants took to be the Pope. Various calculations therefore settled on the years 1650-1656 for his destruction, the gathering of the Gentiles, the conversion of the Jews and their return to Palestine. Other estimates offered the year 1666, the same year that Sabbatai Zevi announced himself as the Jewish messiah, duping an estimate half of the world’s Jewish population.[69]

As Jacob Barnai has shown, among the more avid readers of Menasseh ben Israel’s Hope of Israel were none other than Sabbatai Zevi and his followers.[70] The Jewish community of Amsterdam had been kept informed of the progress of Sabbatai’s mission through Peter Serrarius, at whose home Menasseh ben Israel first shared his conviction in the immanent advent of the messiah. As soon as news reached Amsterdam about Sabbatai Zevi, Serrarius was publishing pamphlets in English and Dutch telling everyone about the signs of the messianic era and that the King of the Jews had arrived.[71]

Almost the entire Jewish community of Amsterdam had become followers of Sabbatai Zevi, having been kept informed of the progress of Sabbatai’s mission through a friend of John Dury, Peter Serrarius, at whose home Menasseh ben Israel first shared his conviction in the imminent advent of the messiah. In 1664, Serrarius rushed into a synagogue after the appearance of a comet and he birth of a two-headed cow, and he and the rabbis performed gematria and concluded that the Messiah would arrive in 1666.[72] As soon as news reached Amsterdam about Zevi, Serrarius was publishing pamphlets in English and Dutch telling everyone about the signs of the messianic era and that the King of the Jews had arrived.[73] Menasseh and La Peyrère’s co-conspirator, Queen Christina, became so fascinated with the claims of Sabbatai Zevi that she nearly became a disciple. She reportedly danced in the streets of Hamburg with Jewish friends in anticipation of the apocalyptic event.[74]

Among Serrarius’ intimate friends were John Dury and Comenius, both of whom he was able to convince of Zevi’s messiahship.[75] Dury, who had been working for twenty-five years for the conversion of the Jews as a precondition for the Second Coming, spent much time trying to figure out where Zevi fit in the expected Christian scenario about the “end of days.” He offered the interpretation that God was rewarding the Jews by having their messianic moment occur, and punishing Christians because they were not “pure” enough.[76]

Serrarius was also in contact with the alchemist Franciscus Mercurius van Helmont, author of the Alphabetum Naturale Hebraicum (1667), and the Christian Kabbalist Christian Knorr von Rosenroth, famous for his Kabbala Denudata. Van Helmont had served on a diplomatic mission on behalf of Elisabeth of Bohemia, the daughter of Elizabeth Stuart and Frederich V of the Palatinate who was living in Herford, Germany, when he met with Henry More and Robert Boyle. Serrarius died in 1669 on his way to Turkey to meet with Zevi.
http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog...uest-new-world
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-01-2019, 11:14 AM   #459
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,999
Likes: 13,343 (7,681 Posts)
Default

War against masculinity (the urge to protect)

An interesting clip below by tucker carlson where he explores why the democrats are siding with the jewish neocons in wanting more war in syria and continued NATO membership

The democrats are attacking trump for wanting to pull the troops out of syria and for discussing the idea of leaving NATO. This feeds into their argument that trump is an agent of putin

In my experience of debating with progressives what usually happens is that they are not honest about their true intentions. They always hide their agenda behind an excuse or hide it behind faux-morality

So as the debate goes on the guy says that baltic countries want to be free and have liberal values. So really the reason the progressives HATE russia is because russia is upholding christian values

The western progressives (i'm loathe to call them 'liberals' as i think they have co-opted that term) want to push transgenderism, pedophilia, materialism, satanism, hi-tech takeover of our lives, war, mammonism and narcissism which are all at odds with russias christian values

The fake-left wants to demonise 'toxic masuclinity' ie male energy which when used properly in society= DISCIPLINE. Yes the dark flip side of masculinity when it is out of balance is oppressive violence but when channeled positively it is good for innovation, protection, self-sacrifice for the common good and also discipline and as we watch society fall apart it becomes clearer and clearer that this demonisation of men by the fake-left has been all about making men step back when what is needed is for men to step UP!

Men cannot step up however without the support of women which is why the cabal has used militant feminism to remove female support for discipline by painting men as an enemy of women

This suppression of the sacred masculine is seeing all kinds of acting out in society and the flourishment of a me, me, me culture

people have lost discipline, they have lost a sense of working for something greater than themselves and they have lost insight that comes from self-reflection which is all part of discipline

The various factions of disgruntled people who all have an axe to grind against society that the cabal has pulled together under the banner of the fake-left all HATE russia because in their eyes it epitomises the masculinity that they so despise

To them putin also embodies masculinity and trump too is despised because he is coming in like daddy to spank the naughty children and the naughty children want to be able to misbehave. Trump is coming in and saying some hard truths about what is sustainable for a society and what isn't and the progressives don't want to think in practical terms because they are all EMOTIONALITY

This is why the fake-left must always hide its irrationality behind faux-morality for example they don't despise russia because it wants to invade latvia. They HATE russia because to them it embodies masculine traits for example it wants to protect itself and its people

They don't argue that trump is working for putin because its true, they do it because that hate that trump is pushing back against the political correctness that they have been using to attack 'heteronormative society'. THATS why they hate him. Its got nothing to do with something rational. It has everything to do with their prejudice

Tucker Carlson Tonight - 1/15/2019 - Tucker Carlson Fox News Live - January 15, 2019

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.