Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Big Brother / Microchipping / Problem-Reaction-Solution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2018, 10:52 PM   #441
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

YouTube censorship RAMPAGE running amok as all the GOOD people keep getting terminated
Thursday, May 10, 2018 by: Vicki Batts

YouTube’s mass censorship is still underway, as more conservatives, libertarians and anyone else who stands in the way of the leftist cult from pushing their propaganda are having their channels taken down left and right. YouTube’s unceremonious account terminations seem to be yielding two responses: Horror, from those who understand that this behavior is disgustingly authoritarian — and applause from the useful idiots who erroneously believe that it’s okay to silence dissenting opinions, as long as it fits their political agenda.

In a war of ideals that seemingly comes straight out of 1984, the “Ministry of Truth” is tearing down anyone who dares to disagree with their left-wing dogma — claiming that these accounts are “violating” YouTube’s policies by spreading “misinformation,” among other ridiculous claims. Apparently, telling the truth and advocating for freedom is now “misinformation,” under the leftist scheme to quash their opposition. Many good people have been silenced under the iron curtain of YouTube’s “moderation” efforts.
We’ve seen it before

As George Orwell wrote, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — for ever.”

That is where we are headed, if corporations like YouTube are allowed to continue their role as acting thought police. Fortunately, there are alternatives to YouTube available, like Real.Video. But the greater problem of YouTube and other social media giants engaging in acts of mass censorship still exists. As SGT Report contends, this is “blatant corporate fascism” at its ugliest, and it simply cannot be ignored any longer.

Earlier in 2018, independent journalist Mike Cernovich revealed that YouTube had taken down his video footage of violent Antifa activists. At the time, Cernovich commented, “YouTube is censoring honest, unedited reporting about ANTIFA’s actions. This can mean only one thing — they endorse far left wing violence.”

Censorship of conservative voices has been going on for a long time. The demonetization and flagging of right-leaning accounts were just the beginning — now we are seeing accounts being terminated without warning or provocation. Even liberals aren’t safe, as Carl Benjamin, also known by his online moniker “Sargon of Akkad,” will tell you. Benjamin, a classical liberal, was locked out of his Google account, and subsequently his YouTube channel. Google, which owns YouTube, gave him a message which said it “looked like it was being used in a way that violates Google’s policies.”

They didn’t even try to pretend that they had proof he violated their terms, they just “suppose” he might have a violation. Benjamin noted at the time that his account had “zero strikes.” He reportedly told Breitbart, “the entire company is riddled with a far-left ideological orthodoxy that has taken hold to a radical degree.”

And, as you might expect, the left-wing media is all but cheering them on. A recent Buzzfeed article described the kinds of content being censored by YouTube as videos that were promoting “hate speech” and “unsafe” content. Seriously?
Who knew living naturally was so controversial?

Apparently the Health Ranger’s video feed, predominantly featuring videos about nutrition, gardening, natural medicine and the like, is “hate speech”to liberals. Newsflash: Just because someone posts something you don’t like or don’t agree with, doesn’t mean you can silence them — not as long as this is still America.

Leftist cult members are using terms like “hate speech,” “fascism,” “white supremacy” and other “four-letter words” to suppress divergent thought. These words, which once had real meaning, have been co-opted by the Left to serve their agenda. They are not fighting against fascism — they are creating it.

Censorship is only the tip of the iceberg, and the manipulation of language (and subsequently, thought) is already underway. What will come next in this vicious circle of suppression and tyranny?
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-05-...ning-amok.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2018, 04:08 PM   #442
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

The Death Of Free Speech: Twitter Ramps Up CENSORSHIP Of ‘Hate Facts’
Mac Slavo
May 10th, 2018
SHTFplan.com

Twitter is banning conservatives and others who don’t subscribe to the leftist mentality plaguing social media. Using the excuse that people are posting “hate facts,” the social media outlet is just shutting down accounts that post any truth that doesn’t fare well for the liberal agenda.

By now, it should be well understood that the terms “hate facts” and “hate speech” are nothing more than buzzwords used by the left as an excuse to suppress the speech of those with which they disagree. This is becoming more and more apparent as we devolve quickly toward a fully totalitarian system too.

Breitbart reported that the most high-profile individual to be banned on this basis was Islam critic Tommy Robinson, who received a permanent ban from Twitter after he posted statistics showing that Muslims are vastly overrepresented in child grooming gangs in the U.K. Robinson is now taking Twitter to court to prove that “facts are now treated as hate.”

The censorship of British accounts, including those of the Britain First team, is tied to increasing pressure from European governments for social media platforms to censor their users. Robinson claims that 10,000 Twitter accounts have been closed at the request of the U.K. government over alleged “hate.”
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-new...facts_05102018
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2018, 09:48 PM   #443
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Diversion ahead – directing the flow of internet traffic away from free speech
Andrew Cheetham
6 hours ago

By Regicide

Free Speech is a value enshrined in constitutions across the world, especially in western cultures. It’s a value that helps demonstrate and keep societies faith in freedom and fairness within the written and even unwritten contract between people and governance. While the right to express opinion freely has existed for some time, the power of free speech can still be regulated through the platforms that deliver it.

With such openly endorsed rights, it is near impossible for any entity to attempt to supress free speech without risking immediate mass criticism and long-term risk to the ongoing contractual accord. However, there is nothing within those rights that prevent government or establishment from influencing or controlling how free opinion reaches audiences. Social engagement, open air theatre and the written word have been the longest existing platforms for the distribution of free expression. There is little anyone can lawfully do to stop you expressing your views at Speakers Corner for example, or handing out leaflets. However, this limits the size of the audience you can hope to reach and therefore any influence your views may have.

Over time, modern day society has enjoyed an expanded range of media platforms, including radio, television, film, theatre, books, newspapers and magazines. They provide access to huge audiences and can influence entire public opinion. However media is not transparent, but translucent. It does not provide an unfettered, unobstructed window to the world. Media is edited. It is not easy or simple to express free speech via the main channels available today. Each channel, and the information that passes through them, is carefully regulated by editors and producers. Many have social or political biases and act as gateways, carefully selecting what information should or should not be expressed to the audience. Stories and articles can be published or dropped, screenplays can be rewritten and adjusted and songs can be promoted or dumped.

This process of editorial control has provided government and establishment with influence over the sluice gates of free speech and information, ensuring some ability to influence and manipulate the flow of free expression. This provides the assurance that information can be controlled without being seen to directly supress it. However, enter the new age of the internet.

The emergence of the internet has presented both significant risk and opportunity to the state in terms of controlling access to free views. The World Wide Web allows anyone to publish any content they like, openly, unedited and unfettered, expressing any opinion. Not only that, such content can be freely accessed by huge audiences, 24/7. While the government and establishment can exercise some control over content that breached laws, they are faced with the uncomfortable truth that a new platform has emerged that could allow anyone to express opinion on anything to everyone at any time, without the ability to regulate through editing.

So the exam question is set, how can the flow of free speech be regulated on the internet without breaching constitutional rights and undermining faith in governance? The answer did not lay in attempting to control editing or production of websites and the material they publish directly, but in influencing and directing internet traffic itself. Originally, the internet provided parity in access to potentially millions of websites, and in essence it still does. The key is influencing the public to voluntarily only choose to access a narrow range of sites where it becomes easier to regulate the information. To demonstrate how this works, let’s use Facebook as an example.

Facebook has become one of the top performers in attracting a huge global audience and dominating online traffic. Ex-Facebook President Sean Parker once stated that Facebook and similar applications are designed to consume as much of your (online) time as possible. Facebook did not pioneer social media, there have been predecessors. But a seemingly bottomless pit of financial investment and promotion has seen it rapidly rise to become one of the top three most visited sites globally. Does Facebook therefore provide the opportunity for the regulation of free information? According to governments and establishments the promotion and distribution of material and information can most certainly be manipulated. For example, accusations of manipulation of election results by foreign entities through influencing public opinion via social media has been publically distressed by authorities.

Facebook is also one of the main channels for identity politics. Former vice-president of Facebook Chamath Palihapitiya openly confided that Facebook does indeed allow the programming of its user’s behaviours and opinions. What’s more, this type of regulation of information and behaviour is often perceived as being conducted by other users themselves. In essence, on the surface the appearance is that the public is policing itself. Therefore, seemingly unaffiliated, impartial and independent social media platforms do have the ability to provide editorial and regulatory powers by influencing and manipulating the news feeds that appear on a user’s account. What is currently called social media, could now be referred to as political media.

Facebook is not alone, before the rise of other social media giants such as Twitter and Instagram, there existed a plethora of alternatives vying for your time. Myspace and Friends Reunited are examples of previous incarnations. However through acquisitioned most were consumed until the top ten are owned by the same two or three giants. Facebook owns Instagram and Whatsapp, Google owns Youtube. This is an important consideration, as statistics show that internet traffic is dominated by just a handful of websites and applications. That handful are owned by an even smaller number of parent companies. In essence, the vast majority of typical and everyday traffic has been funnelled down to accessing just a few big news, retail and social media giants. These are the channels that provide access to the big audiences on the internet today. These are the channels that are becoming increasingly regulated and edited by those that influence and even control the parent companies.

By heavily investing, supporting and controlling the rise in popularity of a handful of channels that now dominate the direction of internet traffic, the ability to regulate how free speech is accessed through the World Wide Web has become within reach. Yes, you can still publish whatever lawful opinion you want, and there is nothing directly stopping your audience from accessing it. But in reality that audience is spending most of its online time on just a handful of channels that can regulate and manipulate their exposure to your expressions of opinion. By borrowing the same techniques used in the traditional media channels, a pseudo editorial framework is in place that allows regulation not of free speech online, but your access and exposure to it.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/47...ay-free-speech
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2018, 05:36 PM   #444
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

US State Passes Law Defining Any Criticism of Israel as ‘Anti-Semitic’ Just As They Kill 60 Civilians
As many Americans criticize the number of civilian deaths on the Gaza Strip, a state has passed a measure labeling criticism of Israel as "anti-Semitism."
By Rachel Blevins -
May 16, 2018

The news that Israel killed more than 60 Palestinians on Monday alone, has sparked criticism from Americans who are frustrated with the United States’ failure to hold one of its closest allies accountable for the human rights violations it is committing—and individuals in one state will soon be labeled as “anti-Semitic” for openly voicing their opinion.

South Carolina will become the first state to legally define criticism of Israel as “anti-Semitism” when a new measure goes into effect on July 1, targeting public schools and universities. While politicians have tried to pass the measure as a standalone law for two years, they finally succeeded temporarily by passing it as a “proviso” that was slipped into the 2018-2019 budget.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/is...-anti-semitic/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 17-05-2018 at 05:36 PM.
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 06:07 PM   #445
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

YouTube begins banning video channels for talking about CBD oil; claims CBD oil “poses risk of serious physical harm or death”
Wednesday, May 16, 2018 by: Mike Adams

Jumping in bed with Big Pharma and the corrupt cancer industry, YouTube has begun banning entire video channels that post videos describing the compassionate use of CBD oil in cancer patients.

In addition to re-banning the Health Ranger video channel over a video that called for racial unity and peace in our world (see below), YouTube has now permanently banned the “Natural News” channel, claiming a 43-second video we posted about the compassionate healing potential of CBD oil was subjecting viewers to “risk of serious physical harm or death.” Rather than allowing the issuance of three strikes before banning a channel, YouTube permanently banned our channel with a single strike (see screen shots below).

This isn’t a typo: YouTube now considers videos that talk about natural medicine and saving lives from cancer to be “harmful” and “dangerous.” Really. That’s what YouTube has now become: an enemy of natural medicine and healing.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-05-...k-of-harm.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 06:13 PM   #446
the nine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16,328
Likes: 4,611 (2,581 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
YouTube begins banning video channels for talking about CBD oil; claims CBD oil “poses risk of serious physical harm or death”
Wednesday, May 16, 2018 by: Mike Adams

Jumping in bed with Big Pharma and the corrupt cancer industry, YouTube has begun banning entire video channels that post videos describing the compassionate use of CBD oil in cancer patients.

In addition to re-banning the Health Ranger video channel over a video that called for racial unity and peace in our world (see below), YouTube has now permanently banned the “Natural News” channel, claiming a 43-second video we posted about the compassionate healing potential of CBD oil was subjecting viewers to “risk of serious physical harm or death.” Rather than allowing the issuance of three strikes before banning a channel, YouTube permanently banned our channel with a single strike (see screen shots below).

This isn’t a typo: YouTube now considers videos that talk about natural medicine and saving lives from cancer to be “harmful” and “dangerous.” Really. That’s what YouTube has now become: an enemy of natural medicine and healing.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-05-...k-of-harm.html
They own it and they will use it to their advantage.
They want to maintain control of the sheoples minds, and more people watch joutube than any tv channels
__________________
"Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be misled;
The truth must be kept secret, and the masses need a teaching proportioned to their imperfect reason… - Albert Pike Sharpen & Use your reasoning daily - the nine
Likes: (1)
the nine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2018, 06:27 PM   #447
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Six Years in Prison for Posting on Social Media

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2018, 06:30 PM   #448
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

New laws to tackle 'wild west' internet will make UK 'safest place in the world' to be online, Matt Hancock claims
Social media firms face billions in fines if they do not comply, warns government

Chris Baynes
6 hours ago

New laws will be introduced aimed at tackling the internet “wild west” and making Britain the “safest place in the world” to be online, the culture secretary has said.

The largest social media companies could be fined billions of pounds if they do not take steps to protect users, Matt Hancock warned.

A new code of practice to tackle online bullying, stricter age verification requirements, and a regular internet safety transparency report to keep tabs on online abuse could also be included in new legislation.

Measures to tackle online harm could be funded through an industry-wide levy on firms such Facebook and Twitter.

It is understood the levy, first proposed by the government last year, will be subject to a further round of consultation with the sector and charities before a final decision is made.

Mr Hancock said work with social media companies to protect users had led to some positive steps being taken but the performance of the industry overall had been mixed.

Only four of the 14 largest social media firms invited to discuss the issue at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) turned up, he told The Andrew Marr Show.

The culture secretary said the snub had given him “a big impetus to drive this proposal to legislate through” because it showed the government does not have the power it needs.

“Before then, and until now, there has been this argument [that you should] work with the companies, do it on a voluntary basis, they’ll do more that way because the lawyers won’t be involved,” he told presenter Emma Barnett.

Launching a consultation on what measures should be used, Mr Hancock said: “Digital technology is overwhelmingly a force for good across the world and we must always champion innovation and change for the better.

“At the same time I have been clear that we have to address the wild west elements of the internet through legislation, in a way that supports innovation. We strongly support technology companies to start up and grow, and we want to work with them to keep our citizens safe.

“People increasingly live their lives through online platforms so it’s more important than ever that people are safe and parents can have confidence they can keep their children from harm.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8360081.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2018, 08:17 PM   #449
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 07:58 PM   #450
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

anyone familiar with george orwells work will always ask when they hear the word 'terrorist' being bandied around by politicians who decides what a terrorist is?

for example if the globalist NWO gang are in charge then they would call anyone who disagrees with the dissolution of national sovereignty a 'terrorist'

doesn't mean they are a terrorist but it allows the globalists to persecute them under the letter of the law

New 'three strikes' law aims to close legal loophole allowing people to stream extremist material

Published time: 6 Jun, 2018 11:09

Legislation designed to stop people in the UK from viewing extremist content online will be introduced in a counter-terrorism bill within days.

The “three strikes” law would close a loophole that currently allows people to watch violent, gruesome, or inflammatory propaganda without fear of prosecution. It is currently deemed an offense if extremist material is downloaded and stored, printed out, or saved in some way.
Under the new law, the offense of possessing information deemed useful to terrorists, would broaden to include material which is streamed or viewed online three or more times.

Home Secretary Sajid Javid will propose that the maximum penalty for the offense be increased from 10 to 15 years imprisonment, stating that a lesson learnt from 2017’s year of terror was that attacks need to be halted earlier.

“There are not enough offences on the statute book,” he said. “For example, if someone is encouraging terrorism online, a threshold needs to be reached before police get involved. We want to lower the threshold.”
https://www.rt.com/uk/428880-terror-...ampaign=chrome
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2018, 07:17 AM   #451
screamingeagle
Moderator
 
screamingeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Croatia/Zagreb
Posts: 6,179
Likes: 656 (413 Posts)
Default

yes......intolerance masked as tolerance

on paper sounds just about right,but in reality will be the opposite......as proven by banned Icke's lectures
__________________
When you'll give up hope I'll teach you Will - Senecea
screamingeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-08-2018, 10:15 AM   #452
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Censorship is the New Front in the War on Consciousness
August 17, 2018
Dylan Charles, Editor
Waking Times

At its core, consciousness is the awareness of being aware. Which is extraordinarily relevant to today’s conversation about the internet censorship being openly carried out by big tech and big government.

You see, when looking at this from the microcosmic level, that is, exploring of the vastness of the inner worlds, increasing consciousness is about digging deep with open eyes to uncover the forces, drivers, baggage, patterns, and programming that influences one’s self. It’s about untangling all of this in order to evolve into one’s highest potential.

Extrapolating this to the macrocosmic, the adage ‘as above, so below – as within, so without,’ is key.

When looking at the outer world with the aim of expanding our consciousness of it, we must also dig deep with open eyes. We must sideline the fear inherent in this sort of exploration, and allow many friendly and unfriendly truths to sink into one’s awareness of the world around us. In order to make the best choices for ourselves, this view must be as broad and as complete as possible.

In 2013, author and researcher Graham Hancock introduced into the current zeitgeist the notion of a war on consciousness.

His perspective was centered around the war on drugs and the development of an international police state. In order to achieve this level of totalitarian control, our perspective must be restricted. And our perception of human potential must not be allowed to move beyond the current socio-economic and political realities.

Hancock suggests that in order to continue to evolve, people must be allowed to follow their innate human drive to seek altered states of consciousness, where guidance and inspiration can be found in abundance.
read on here https://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/08/...consciousness/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 19-08-2018 at 10:15 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2018, 06:43 PM   #453
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Free Speech Censorship With Police So Keen To Assist - The David Icke Videocast

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2018, 12:26 PM   #454
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Honest Government Ad | Article 13 (Internet Censorship Bill)

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2018, 04:42 PM   #455
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Abby Martin On Billionaires Silencing Independent Media

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2018, 02:12 PM   #456
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2018, 02:13 PM   #457
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

The Internet Is A Scam - And This Is Why - The David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2018, 02:14 PM   #458
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Revolving Door: Dozens of Clinton Staffers Hired by Google — and Vice-Versa
By Charlie Nash
13 Sep 20181697
Dozens of people who used to work for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and a number of Clinton initiatives went on to work at Google, and vice-versa.

At least twelve employees from the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clinton Foundation, and the Clinton Health Access Initiative went on to work for Google, while at least fifteen Google employees went on to work for Hillary For America. The list was originally developed by Adam Townsend on Twitter.

Pls look at thread and behold #Google “we’re the good, evil company” This list is employees of Google & Groundworks (goog co built to help HRC elex) that have been swapped in/out of Dept of State/ #Clinton Foundation/ #Hillary Prez campaign/New America (dem org)

— Adam Townsend (@adamscrabble) April 28, 2018

Here is the list of employees:

Peter Albers, former Finance and Operations Director at the Clinton Foundation, before moving to Google Fiber as Head of Partnerships and Market Development in 2015. In 2017, he became Google’s Global Head of Business Development and Head of Americas Retail Partnerships for Google Play Retail.

Shannon Jones Newberry, former Deputy Director of Communications at the Clinton Global Initiative, before becoming Communications and Public Affairs Manager at Google in 2012.

Jeff Lawi, a former analyst at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, before joining Google in 2013 where he has held a number of positions, including Product Support Manager, Senior Product Support Manager, and Principal, Strategy, and Business Operations.

Nathan Allen, a former consultant at the Clinton Foundation, before becoming a Senior Creative Producer and Launch Manager at Google in 2015. Allen is currently an Executive Producer at Google.

Puiyan Leung, a former consultant for the Clinton Foundation through Stern Consulting Corps. Leung had been an intern at Google before serving as a consultant for the Clinton Foundation, and he returned to Google in 2013 as a financial analyst, before becoming a program manager in 2015. Leung left Google to work for Facebook in 2016.

Felicia Yep Salinas, former Employment and Labor Commitment Maker at the Clinton Global Initiative before joining Google in 2015 as a Talent Hacker. She then became a Technical Sourcer in 2016, before moving to Facebook months later.

John Lyman, according to the website for GV where he now works, “helped launch the Clinton Global Initiative,” worked as Deputy Chairperson, and focused on “progressive policy and advocacy,” before joining Google for “a decade” where he served as Head of Partnerships and Marketing for Google for Entrepreneurs.

Scot Frank, a former mentor at the Clinton Global Initiative, joined Google as a product manager in 2014.

Theodore Przybyla, former Working Group Manager at the Clinton Global Initiative, joined Google as an engagement manager in 2015, before leaving for the Brookings Institution in September 2017.

Justin Pang, former Deputy Chief Operating Officer at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, joined Google in 2012. Having served as Strategic Partner Lead of Global Partnerships and Team Lead of Global Partnerships, he is currently the Head of Partnerships.

Maria Wang-Faulkner, former Country Support Manager at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, joined Google as a Strategic Partner Manager in 2016, and currently serves as Strategic Partner Development Manager for Google Assistant.

Paul Lee, a former consultant for the Clinton Foundation, joined Google in 2007 as a Senior Product Manager, before leaving in 2015.

Stephanie Hannon, former Group Product Manager at Google, left the company in 2011 before becoming a Product Manager at Facebook in 2012. Hannon then moved back to Google in 2013 as a Director of Product Management for just over two years, before she became the Chief Technology Officer for Hillary For America in April 2015.

Osi Imeokparia, former Product Management Director at Google, left the company in 2015 to become Chief Product Officer at Hillary For America. Imeokparia currently works at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which is owned by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Derek Parham, former Technical Lead of Google Apps, joined Hillary For America in 2016 as Deputy Chief Technology Officer.

Jason Rosenbaum has worked in a number of Democrat Party-affiliated positions, including as Deputy Director of Online Communications for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee between April 2007 and March 2009, and Digital Director for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee between March 2009 and June 2013. Rosenbaum then became Director of Elections and Advocacy at Google in July 2013, before leaving to become Director of Digital Advertising at Hillary For America in July 2015.

Nathaniel Welch, a former Site Reliability Engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America as Staff Site Reliability Engineer in January 2016.

Henry Bridge, former Product Manager at Google, left to join Facebook in June 2011, before becoming Director of Product at Hillary For America in January 2016.

Fred Wulff, a former software engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America in March 2016 as a software engineer and manager.

Divina Videna Chung, former Operations Point of Contact at Google Express, joined Hillary For America in February 2016 as California Phone Bank Captain and Nevada Precinct Captain. She also worked at Uber, before moving to Facebook as an Oculus VR Brand Ambassador.

Danny Bowman, a former Product Specialist at Google, joined Hillary For America in July 2016 as a software engineer.

James Plummer, a former User Experience Designer at Google, joined Hillary For America in January 2016 as Lead Product Designer and Manager.

Andrea Frome, a former software engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America in May 2016 as a senior software engineer.

Maxwell Nunes, a former Political Advertising Fellow at Google, joined Hillary For America’s digital team in June 2015. Nunes currently works in digital policy at Airbnb.

Remy DeCausemaker, a former mentor at Google Summer of Code, joined Hillary For America in June 2016 as Open Source Community Manager, before becoming Open Source Program Manager at Twitter in June 2017.

Dina Lamdany, a former software engineering intern at Google, joined Hillary For America in June 2015 as a data analyst, before moving back to Google as an Associate Product Manager.

Corey Bertram, a former software engineering intern at Google, worked with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and claimed to be “responsible for building backend platform and infra for Hillary Clinton 2016.”

This year, Breitbart Tech also discovered that dozens of former Clinton and Obama staffers were now working at Facebook.

In 2016, WikiLeaks claimed Google was “directly engaged” with and working for the Clinton presidential campaign, while leaked emails showed that former Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt wanted to be the “Head Outside Advisor” to the Clinton Campaign.

Schmidt was also “instrumental” in creating the “The Groundwork,” a company that sought to put Clinton into the White House, and Google worked to hide negative search results of Clinton during the presidential campaign.

In a leaked video released by Breitbart Tech of an internal meeting at Google shortly after Clinton’s presidential campaign defeat in 2016, Google executives, including CEO Sundar Pichai, co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat, and Vice Presidents Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton expressed strong and negative reactions to the results.

Brin announced that the meeting is “probably not the most joyous we’ve had” and claimed to find the election results “deeply offensive,” claiming it “conflicts with many of [Google’s] values.”

After an employee asked if Google would “invest in grassroots, hyper-local efforts to bring tools and services and understanding of Google products and knowledge” so Americans can “make informed decisions that are best for themselves,” Pichai claimed the company would ensure that “educational products” reach “segments of the population [they] are not [currently] fully reaching,” and expressed that “investments in machine learning and AI” could stop “misinformation” shared by “low-information voters.”

The executives also applauded an employee who made a remark about needing to recognize “white privilege” following the election.

Charlie Nash is a reporter for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington, or like his page at Facebook.


read on here https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/...paign=20180913
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 14-09-2018 at 02:14 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2018, 07:26 AM   #459
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Skip to @14 mins to hear richie outline this new copyright legislation (article 13) being passed through the EU parliament and also proposals by ofcom to make independent broadcasters have to have a licence

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-09-2018, 05:52 PM   #460
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,667 (7,885 Posts)
Default

Amber Rudd proposes new ID scheme for the 'digital age' (Debate)

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.