Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21-06-2013, 06:29 PM   #1
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default 9/11 Drills. The real proof of inside job.

Just thought I`d recap the many drills and exercises taking place on 9/11 in some detail for the benefit of any who might have missed this crucial political evidence of an inside job on 9/11. None of this evidence can be explained away as coincidence and happenstance and without the drills the attacks of 9/11 could not possibly have succeeded at all. Yet it is largely forgotten by the Truth Movement and the grateful debunkers who don`t have to grapple with this damning evidence, and who can instead engage in endless, and fruitless, hyper technical debates about the melting point of steel, the nature of invisible fires, floor trusses and "thermal expansion". On to the drills and exercises taking place on 9/11 therefore!

1:Vigilant Guardian.

Closely mimicked the events of 9/11. Joint US/Canadian exercise, designed to test the "coordination of the two defense establishments".
Described by globalsecurity.org as an overview CPX (command post exercise), conducted in conjunction with Global Guardian and Apollo Guardian (more about those later). VG is a yearly NORAD exercise, but VG 01 focused specifically on terrorists using hijacked planes as weapons.
However, as the 9/11 Commission noted, Vigilant Guardian also "postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union". It was therefore a combined hijacking and WW3 exercise, and it contributed to the confusion among NORAD emergency response teams by using false radar signals for training exercises at the same time as "real" hijackings were taking place. Without this confusion there should have been a decent chance of shooting down the first plane heading towards NYC, and none of the three subsequent planes could have reached their intended targets at all. Because of Vigilant Guardian the intercept time of the fighter wings assigned to defend the eastern corridor increased from about 7 minutes before and after 9/11 to more than an hour in the case of Flight 77. Only within the narrow window provided by the Vigilant Guardian exercise could the 9/11 attacks have succeeded.
Why did they occur in precisely this window? Obviously they had to, or they couldn`t have succeeded, but was the US command structure infiltrated by al Qaida who used their positions inside the USA to arrange all these drills deliberately, was al Qaida tipped off by moles on the inside so they could arrange the attacks during the Vigilant Guardian window, or were they in fact simply controlled patsies set up to take the fall for a US/NATO false flag operation? It shouldn`t even be necessary to point out which of these alternatives is the most plausible.
Regardless, VG is the single most important exercise of 9/11 because it looks the most like the official fable about the hijackers, and is therefore the most likely medium for organizing this part of 9/11 through the "security" bureaucracy.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...ilant_guardian

2: Vigilant Warrior:

Mentioned by Richard Clarke in his memoirs as a second component of the ongoing NORAD exercise (Vigilant Guardian), possibly as the red team organizing the hijackings, real and fake. Details are hard to find and VW 01 is classified.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...gilant_warrior

3: Operation Northern Vigilance:

Billed as a counter drill to an ongoing Russian drill, NV redeployed fighter planes to Alaska and northern Canada, stripping EC (eastern corridor) fighter cover just in time for 9/11. NORAD has not disclosed how many planes it removed from the contiguous US in time for 9/11 under the cover of NV.

"NORAD shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to FOLs (Forward Operating Locations) in Alaska and northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean. NORAD is the eyes and ears of North America and it is our mission to ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained"
Cheyenne Mountain AFS, Colorado.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...hern_vigilance

4: Northern Guardian:

Thought to be associated with NV but outside of a few mentions in Canadian press not much is known. Possibly a twin exercise to NV to have one group of planes posing as the hostiles while the other played defense. Whatever the particulars this exercise seems to have been centered on Alaska and northern Canada as well.

http://www.911myths.com/html/operati..._guardian.html

Reference is from the detestable lie operation called 9/11 Myths, which like Wikipedia insists on calling the truth "myths", and the writer pretends not to understand that an exercise that moves planes to Iceland lowers response capabilities and is therefore relevant to 9/11. Intelligent people will have no problem understanding this point though.

5: National Reconnaissance Office Drill (NRO).

This drill simulated an airplane crashing into the NRO HQ in Virginia. As a consequence of this drill the NRO staff were evacuated from the building exactly when the 9/11 attacks occurred. This is the reason why the satelite surveillance of the attacks has not been made available. Allegedly there is none because of the NRO drill, and all space based surveillance was conveniently disabled in time for the 9/11 attacks.
AP reported: "Top US intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11 2001".
What an amazing coincidence...

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/...e-drill-_x.htm

6: Tripod II.

Biological warfare exercise conducted jointly between DoJ (Department of Justice, under the control of John Ashcroft, the man who lost an election to a dead guy) and the City of New York. Scheduled for 9/12 01 and officially never took place. Would have provided plausible cover for critical pre 9/11 activities in New York, such as rigging both towers and WTC 7 with explosives. Reported by Giuliani, the arch criminal, in his memoir "Leadership" (apparently the working title was "Treason" but was changed by the publisher). He stated that the "materials to be used in the drill" was stored at Pier 92, and that his command center was in WTC 7. As soon as WTC 7 was demolished Giuliani moved his treason command post (popularly known as the exercise command post or emergency management control center, but treason is more appropriate so I`ll stick with that) to Pier 92. Tripod II is the most glaringly obvious cover for the demolitions in NYC, the destruction of evidence following the attacks as well as the fake reporting afterwards to sell the official version. Technical, military, media, surveillance, detonations, police and firefighters could all have been, and probably were, controlled from Pier 92, under cover of Tripod II.

http://they-let-it-happen.blogspot.n...of-tripod.html

7: Amalgam Virgo:

Air defend against rogue state cruise missiles/hijackings. A probable cover for the attack on the Pentagon, which was originally billed as, and also looked like, a missile attack rather than a plane crash.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...91106132538231

8: Amalgam Warrior:

Large air defense drill and air intercept, tracking and surveillance. Possibly the red force for Amalgam Virgo, providing hijacked planes/missiles, real and false.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...malgam_warrior

9: Global Guardian:

Armageddon exercise. Nuclear war drill directed toward the arctic and Russia, further depleting continental defenses in the USA. GG is likely to be the defensive component of Apollo Guardian, presumably poised to respond to a nuclear first strike (probably by Russia, but who knows with the Strangeloves in the Pentagon).

http://911review.org/brad.com/wargam...lGuardian.html

10: Crown Vigilance:

Air combat command exercise.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...rown_vigilance

11: Apollo Guardian:

Large scale live fly air defense and air intercept, tracking and surveillance drill. Nuclear strike simulation. Possibly a component of Global Guardian, or a parallel exercise or red team threatening nuclear attack within the exercise scripting. Hints to a possible nuclear blackmail/nuclear first strike option having been built into the 9/11 exercise complex. Possibly the most ominous of all the drills I have listed, but also less revealing since no nuclear first strike occurred. Nuclear blackmail may have though, and the Bush-Putin phone call has never had its content disclosed at all, but has largely disappeared from the MSM coverage (surprise surprise).

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...pollo_guardian



12: AWACS/Noble Eagle:

AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) drill over Washington DC and Florida.

http://www.historycommons.org/contex...item=a955awacs

AWACS planes may have been involved in all three alleged plane crashes. Reportedly AWACS can be fitted with remote control systems for taking over control of nearby planes. Wikipedia also states that Operation Noble Eagle went into effect on 9/11, and that it was somehow a success, despite the abject and total failure on every front by all involved on that day. Allegedly it involved using AWACS craft to "patrol and defend American Airspace". Cynics might consider this too little too late, but not Wikipedia... Whether Noble Eagle and the AWACS drill I just referenced were one and the same I haven`t been able to find out.

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense...ww/usnato.page

Unpiloted passenger planes in use in the UK, being controlled remotely from the ground.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...g-dilemma.html

The first trans Pacific remotely flown UAV was tested in April 2001 and was controlled from a distance by an AWACS aircraft.

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01d.html

My purpose with the links is to demonstrate that AWACS can be, is being and has for years been used to remotely control other aircraft, and that a large AWACS drill (or two) taking place on 9/11 is therefore a highly suspicious circumstance. It is not to have a long, meaningless technical debate about these aircrafts or any beneficial uses they may have.

13: Firemen (Pentagon)

"Aircraft crash refresher course" for firefighters. Scheduled for the morning of 9/11 in yet another amazing coincidence.

http://911blogger.com/node/16128

14: Timely Alert:

Emergency response to bomb attacks.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...imely_alert_ii


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: Many of these drills and exercises are annual "security", "intelligence" and "defense" events. What makes them suspicious with regard to 9/11 is firstly that the content of the 01 versions was apparently altered to closely resemble the attacks which actually occurred, or to sabotage air defense and surveillance, apparently on purpose. Secondly they were also all concentrated on and around this one date, which is atypical for annual drills, and indeed all drills, which tend to be separated in time to deal with isolated hypothesis and strategies. Pointing to the annual character of these drills therefore does nothing to counter the points I have raised.

These are the most relevant drills taking place on 9/11 itself, but there are others, depending on what you consider relevant. And if you include earlier exercises leading up to 9/11 there are almost 50 altogether, all dealing specifically with elements of the 9/11 attacks. A relatively exhaustive list by Webster Tarpley can be found here: http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/08/2...bster-tarpley/ for those who are interested in all of them. For those who want to really dig into this all important aspect of 9/11 I recommend any of Mike Ruppert`s many books, such as Crossing the Rubicon, or Webster Tarpley`s book 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA.
The obvious political point to make with all these conspicuous drills is to ask the hard questions we need to: If the official story is true, why were there all these drills more or less exactly like the actual attacks going on during the attacks, and/or which sabotaged regular, procedural emergency responses? How could the confused and disorganized boxcutter-wielding morons of the official version have known about all these drills in order to time their attacks accordingly? Why would the US government and national "security" state be so deliberately incompetent as to strip its own response capabilities and confuse emergency response personnel by concentrating so many drills on one day? Who did organize all this to coincide with the 9/11 attacks? Donald Rumsfeld? Dick Cheney? Karl Rove? General Myers? Rudolph Giuliani? John Ashcroft? George Bush 41 and 43? Benjamin Netanyahu? Richard Perle? General Schumacher? Richard Clarke? Condolezza Rice? Or was it possibly all of the above and more? Either way we need to know.


I apologize if people already knew this stuff, but I couldn`t find anything about the drills on the forum and thought I`d go over it again. Politically this is some of the most damning evidence available against the official myth of al Qaida and 9/11, which is why I think it`s being avoided like the plague by our debunker friends. Let`s shove it right back in their faces where it belongs! The only possible response from the naysayers is either denial or to try and sell this as some form of a massive coincidence. In both cases they have lost before the debate starts, and they know it. That`s why there are no debates about drills on these forums. The reality is that so many drills would NEVER have been arranged on the same day for reasons of security and defense integrity, and no other day in US history has such an amazing concentration of drills. When faced with this incredibly suspicious stuff, what does it even matter what fire does to steel, or whether there were planes or not? 9/11 was an inside job either way, and the drills prove it.
The very real political consequence of exposing the drills, as opposed to other aspects of 9/11, is that public awareness of them means that it will be close to impossible for the US government in particular, and NATO governments in general, to comfortably stage such an elaborate false flag again. They will be too scared to get caught again like they were on 9/11, and as a consequence they are restricted to small actions where the amount and size of the accompanying drills can be kept small enough to escape notice. In a very real way therefore we can save the public from really huge false flag events for a generation by focusing on the 9/11 drills, because they would be nearly impossible to conduit through the bureaucracy without multiple drills and exercises to camouflage them. Making the drills impossible therefore makes terrorism impossible. This makes it well worth our time and effort to all become drill watchers and to make sure as many people as possible know about the 9/11 drills. Above all the presence of drills before and during "terrorist" attacks is one of the clearest signs of a synthetic terrorist event, and indeed they were present in Boston, in London in 05, in Madrid in 04 and in Oklahoma City in 1995. No synthetic terrorism can be performed by NATO governments without drills to hide them from decent, if naive, people in the bureaucracy, and no propaganda can work on people who have noticed this connection between drills and terrorism.

Last edited by ex sheep; 22-07-2013 at 11:12 AM.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2013, 06:34 PM   #2
iq_145
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Trapped in a body.
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skulb View Post
Just thought I`d recap the many drills and exercises taking place on 9/11 in some detail for the benefit of any who might have missed this crucial political evidence of an inside job on 9/11. None of this evidence can be explained away as coincidence and happenstance and without the drills the attacks of 9/11 could not possibly have succeeded at all. Yet it is largely forgotten by the Truth movement and the grateful debunkers who don`t have to grapple with this damning evidence, and who can instead engage in endless, and fruitless, hyper technical debates about the melting point of steel, the nature of invisible fires, floor trusses and "thermal expansion".

1:Vigilant Guardian.

Closely mimicked the events of 9/11. Joint US/Canadian exercise, designed to test the "coordination of the two defense establishments".
Described by globalsecurity.org as an overview CPX (command post exercise), conducted in conjunction with Global Guardian and Apollo Guardian (more about those later). VG is a yearly NORAD exercise, but VG 01 focused specifically on terrorists using hijacked planes as weapons.
However, as the 9/11 Commission noted, Vigilant Guardian also "postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union". It was therefore a combined hijacking and WW3 exercise, and it contributed to the confusion among NORAD emergency response teams by using false radar signals for training exercises at the same time as "real" hijackings were taking place. Without this confusion there should have been a decent chance of shooting down the first plane heading towards NYC, and none of the three subsequent planes could have reached their targets at all. Because of Vigilant Guardian the intercept time of the fighter wings assigned to defend the eastern corridor increased from about 7 minutes before and after 9/11 to more than an hour in the case of flight 77. Only within the narrow window provided by the Vigilant Guardian exercise could the 9/11 attacks have succeeded.
Why did they occur in precisely this window?

2: Vigilant Warrior:

Mentioned by Richard Clarke in his memoirs as a second component of the ongoing NORAD exercise, possibly as the red team organizing the hijackings, real and fake. Details are hard to find and VW 01 is classified.

3: Operation Northern Vigilance:

Billed as a counter drill to an ongoing Russian drill, NV redeployed fighter planes to Alaska and northern Canada, stripping EC (eastern corridor) fighter cover just in time for 9/11. NORAD has not diclosed how many planes it removed from the contiguous US in time for 9/11 under the cover of NV.

"NORAD shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to FOLS (Forward Operating Locations in Alaska and northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean. NORAD is the eyes and ears of North America and it is our mission to ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained"
Cheyenne Mountain AFS, Colorado.


4: Northern Guardian:

Thought to be associated with NV but outside of a few mentions in Canadian press not much is known. Possibly a twin exercise to NV to have one group of planes posing as the hostiles while the other played defense. Whatever the particulars this exercise seems to have been centered on Alaska and northern Canada as well.

5: National Reconnaissance Office Drill (NRO).

This drill simulated an airplane crashing into the NRO HQ in Virginia. As a consequence of this drill the NRO staff were evacuated from the building exactly when the 9/11 attacks occurred. This is the reason why the satelite surveillance of the attacks has not been made available. Allegedly there is none because of the NRO drill, and all space based surveillance was conveniently disabled in time for the 9/11 attacks.
AP reported: "Top US intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11 2001".
What an amazing coincidence...

6: Tripod II.

Biological warfare exercise conducted jointly between DoJ (Department of Justice (lol)) and the City of New York. Scheduled for 9/12 01 and officially never took place. Would have provided plausible cover for critical pre 9/11 activities in new York, such as rigging both towers and WTC 7 with explosives. Reported by Giuliani, the arch criminal, in his memoir "Leadership" (apparently the working title was "treason" but was changed by the publisher). He stated that the "materials to be used in the drill" was stored at Pier 92, and that his command center was in WTC 7. As soon as WTC 7 was demolished Giuliani moved his treason command post, eerm I mean exercise command post to Pier 92.

8: Amalgam Virgo:

Air defend against rogue state /cruise missiles and hijackings. A possible cover for the attack on the Pentagon,

9: Northern Guardian. Mirror exercise to Vigilant Guardian. Air defense.

10: Amalgam Warrior. Large air defense drill and air intercept, tracking and surveillance. Possibly the red force for Amalgam Virgo, providing hijacked planes/missiles, real and false.

11: Global Guardian. Armageddon exercise. Nuclear war drill directed toward the arctic and Russia, further depleting continental defenses in the USA.

12: Crown Vigilance: Air combat command exercise.

13: Apollo Guardian: Large scale live fly air defense and air intercept, tracking and surveillance drill.

14: AWACS. AWACS drill over Washington DC and Florida. AWACS planes may have been involved in all three alleged plane crashes.


15: Firemen (Pentagon) "aircraft crash refresher course" for firefighters. Scheduled for the morning of 9/11 in yet another amazing coincidence.

16: Timely Alert: Emergency response to bomb attacks.

These are the most relevant drills taking place on 9/11 itself, but there are many others. And if you include earlier exercises leading up to 9/11 there are almost 50 altogether, all dealing specifically with elements of the 9/11 attacks. A relatively exhaustive list by Webster Tarpley can be found here: http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/08/2...bster-tarpley/ for those who are interested in all of them.
The obvious political point to make with all these conspicuous drills is to ask the hard questions we need to: If the official story is true, why were there all these drills more or less exactly like the actual attacks? How could the confused and disorganized box cutter wielding morons of the official version have known about all these drills in order to time their attacks accordingly? Why would the US government and national "security" state be so deliberately incompetent as to strip its own response capabilities and confuse emergency response personnel by concentrating so many drills on one day? Who did organize all this to coincide with the 9/11 attacks? Rumsfeld? Cheney? Karl Rove? General Meyers? Either way we need to know.


I apologize if people already knew this stuff, but I couldn`t find anything on the drills on the forum and thought I`d go over it again. Politically this is some of the most damning evidence available against the official myth of al Qaida, which is why I think it`s being avoided like the plague by our debunker friends. let`s shove it right back in their faces where it belongs!
This could go under the "Unifying Statement" thread just started.
__________________
The Titanic never sank, it was the Olympic that the US Navy sank in the North Atlantic in 1912.
iq_145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2013, 06:36 PM   #3
lobuk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Roger That
Posts: 21,944
Likes: 3,706 (2,108 Posts)
Default

Great post skulb.
lobuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2013, 06:42 PM   #4
air_bn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 3 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skulb View Post
Just thought I`d recap the many drills and exercises taking place on 9/11 in some detail for the benefit of any who might have missed this crucial political evidence of an inside job on 9/11. None of this evidence can be explained away as coincidence and happenstance and without the drills the attacks of 9/11 could not possibly have succeeded at all. Yet it is largely forgotten by the Truth Movement and the grateful debunkers who don`t have to grapple with this damning evidence, and who can instead engage in endless, and fruitless, hyper technical debates about the melting point of steel, the nature of invisible fires, floor trusses and "thermal expansion". On to the drills and exercises taking place on 9/11 therefore!

1:Vigilant Guardian.

Closely mimicked the events of 9/11. Joint US/Canadian exercise, designed to test the "coordination of the two defense establishments".
Described by globalsecurity.org as an overview CPX (command post exercise), conducted in conjunction with Global Guardian and Apollo Guardian (more about those later). VG is a yearly NORAD exercise, but VG 01 focused specifically on terrorists using hijacked planes as weapons.
However, as the 9/11 Commission noted, Vigilant Guardian also "postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union". It was therefore a combined hijacking and WW3 exercise, and it contributed to the confusion among NORAD emergency response teams by using false radar signals for training exercises at the same time as "real" hijackings were taking place. Without this confusion there should have been a decent chance of shooting down the first plane heading towards NYC, and none of the three subsequent planes could have reached their intended targets at all. Because of Vigilant Guardian the intercept time of the fighter wings assigned to defend the eastern corridor increased from about 7 minutes before and after 9/11 to more than an hour in the case of Flight 77. Only within the narrow window provided by the Vigilant Guardian exercise could the 9/11 attacks have succeeded.
Why did they occur in precisely this window? Obviously they had to, or they couldn`t have succeeded, but was the US command structure infiltrated by al Qaida who used their positions inside the USA to arrange all these drills deliberately, was al Qaida tipped off by moles on the inside so they could arrange the attacks during the Vigilant Guardian window, or were they in fact simply controlled patsies set up to take the fall for a US/NATO false flag operation? It shouldn`t even be necessary to point out which of these alternatives is the most plausible.
Regardless, VG is the single most important exercise of 9/11 because it looks the most like the official fable about the hijackers, and is therefore the most likely medium for organizing this part of 9/11 through the "security" bureaucracy.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...ilant_guardian

2: Vigilant Warrior:

Mentioned by Richard Clarke in his memoirs as a second component of the ongoing NORAD exercise (Vigilant Guardian), possibly as the red team organizing the hijackings, real and fake. Details are hard to find and VW 01 is classified.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...gilant_warrior

3: Operation Northern Vigilance:

Billed as a counter drill to an ongoing Russian drill, NV redeployed fighter planes to Alaska and northern Canada, stripping EC (eastern corridor) fighter cover just in time for 9/11. NORAD has not disclosed how many planes it removed from the contiguous US in time for 9/11 under the cover of NV.

"NORAD shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to FOLs (Forward Operating Locations) in Alaska and northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean. NORAD is the eyes and ears of North America and it is our mission to ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained"
Cheyenne Mountain AFS, Colorado.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...hern_vigilance

4: Northern Guardian:

Thought to be associated with NV but outside of a few mentions in Canadian press not much is known. Possibly a twin exercise to NV to have one group of planes posing as the hostiles while the other played defense. Whatever the particulars this exercise seems to have been centered on Alaska and northern Canada as well.

http://www.911myths.com/html/operati..._guardian.html

Reference is from the detestable lie operation called 9/11 Myths, which like Wikipedia insists on calling the truth "myths", and the writer pretends not to understand that an exercise that moves planes to Iceland lowers response capabilities and is therefore relevant to 9/11. Intelligent people will have no problem understanding this point though.

5: National Reconnaissance Office Drill (NRO).

This drill simulated an airplane crashing into the NRO HQ in Virginia. As a consequence of this drill the NRO staff were evacuated from the building exactly when the 9/11 attacks occurred. This is the reason why the satelite surveillance of the attacks has not been made available. Allegedly there is none because of the NRO drill, and all space based surveillance was conveniently disabled in time for the 9/11 attacks.
AP reported: "Top US intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11 2001".
What an amazing coincidence...

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/...e-drill-_x.htm

6: Tripod II.

Biological warfare exercise conducted jointly between DoJ (Department of Justice, under the control of John Ashcroft, the man who lost an election to a dead guy) and the City of New York. Scheduled for 9/12 01 and officially never took place. Would have provided plausible cover for critical pre 9/11 activities in New York, such as rigging both towers and WTC 7 with explosives. Reported by Giuliani, the arch criminal, in his memoir "Leadership" (apparently the working title was "Treason" but was changed by the publisher). He stated that the "materials to be used in the drill" was stored at Pier 92, and that his command center was in WTC 7. As soon as WTC 7 was demolished Giuliani moved his treason command post (popularly known as the exercise command post or emergency management control center, but treason is more appropriate so I`ll stick with that) to Pier 92. Tripod II is the most glaringly obvious cover for the demolitions in NYC, the destruction of evidence following the attacks as well as the fake reporting afterwards to sell the official version. Technical, military, media, surveillance, detonations, police and firefighters could all have been, and probably were, controlled from Pier 92, under cover of Tripod II.

http://they-let-it-happen.blogspot.n...of-tripod.html

7: Amalgam Virgo:

Air defend against rogue state cruise missiles/hijackings. A probable cover for the attack on the Pentagon, which was originally billed as, and also looked like, a missile attack rather than a plane crash.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...91106132538231

8: Amalgam Warrior:

Large air defense drill and air intercept, tracking and surveillance. Possibly the red force for Amalgam Virgo, providing hijacked planes/missiles, real and false.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...malgam_warrior

9: Global Guardian:

Armageddon exercise. Nuclear war drill directed toward the arctic and Russia, further depleting continental defenses in the USA. GG is likely to be the defensive component of Apollo Guardian, presumably poised to respond to a nuclear first strike (probably by Russia, but who knows with the Strangeloves in the Pentagon).

http://911review.org/brad.com/wargam...lGuardian.html

10: Crown Vigilance:

Air combat command exercise.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...rown_vigilance

11: Apollo Guardian:

Large scale live fly air defense and air intercept, tracking and surveillance drill. Nuclear strike simulation. Possibly a component of Global Guardian, or a parallel exercise or red team threatening nuclear attack within the exercise scripting. Hints to a possible nuclear blackmail/nuclear first strike option having been built into the 9/11 exercise complex. Possibly the most ominous of all the drills I have listed, but also less revealing since no nuclear first strike occurred. Nuclear blackmail may have though, and the Bush-Putin phone call has never had its content disclosed at all, but has largely disappeared from the MSM coverage (surprise surprise).

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...pollo_guardian



12: AWACS/Noble Eagle:

AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System) drill over Washington DC and Florida.

http://www.historycommons.org/contex...item=a955awacs

AWACS planes may have been involved in all three alleged plane crashes. Reportedly AWACS can be fitted with remote control systems for taking over control of nearby planes. Wikipedia also states that Operation Noble Eagle went into effect on 9/11, and that it was somehow a success, despite the abject and total failure on every front by all involved on that day. Allegedly it involved using AWACS craft to "patrol and defend American Airspace". Cynics might consider this too little too late, but not Wikipedia... Whether Noble Eagle and the AWACS drill I just referenced were one and the same I haven`t been able to find out.

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense...ww/usnato.page

Unpiloted passenger planes in use in the UK, being controlled remotely from the ground.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...g-dilemma.html

The first trans Pacific remotely flown UAV was tested in April 2001 and was controlled from a distance by an AWACS aircraft.

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01d.html

My purpose with the links is to demonstrate that AWACS can be, is being and has for years been used to remotely control other aircraft, and that a large AWACS drill (or two) taking place on 9/11 is therefore a highly suspicious circumstance. It is not to have a long, meaningless technical debate about these aircrafts or any beneficial uses they may have.

13: Firemen (Pentagon)

"Aircraft crash refresher course" for firefighters. Scheduled for the morning of 9/11 in yet another amazing coincidence.

http://911blogger.com/node/16128

14: Timely Alert:

Emergency response to bomb attacks.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity...imely_alert_ii


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE: Many of these drills and exercises are annual "security", "intelligence" and "defense" events. What makes them suspicious with regard to 9/11 is firstly that the content of the 01 versions was apparently altered to closely resemble the attacks which actually occurred, or to sabotage air defense and surveillance, apparently on purpose. Secondly they were also all concentrated on and around this one date, which is atypical for annual drills, and indeed all drills, which tend to be separated in time to deal with isolated hypothesis and strategies. Pointing to the annual character of these drills therefore does nothing to counter the points I have raised.

These are the most relevant drills taking place on 9/11 itself, but there are others, depending on what you consider relevant. And if you include earlier exercises leading up to 9/11 there are almost 50 altogether, all dealing specifically with elements of the 9/11 attacks. A relatively exhaustive list by Webster Tarpley can be found here: http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/08/2...bster-tarpley/ for those who are interested in all of them. For those who want to really dig into this all important aspect of 9/11 I recommend any of Mike Ruppert`s many books, such as Crossing the Rubicon, or Webster Tarpley`s book 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA.
The obvious political point to make with all these conspicuous drills is to ask the hard questions we need to: If the official story is true, why were there all these drills more or less exactly like the actual attacks going on during the attacks, and/or which sabotaged regular, procedural emergency responses? How could the confused and disorganized boxcutter-wielding morons of the official version have known about all these drills in order to time their attacks accordingly? Why would the US government and national "security" state be so deliberately incompetent as to strip its own response capabilities and confuse emergency response personnel by concentrating so many drills on one day? Who did organize all this to coincide with the 9/11 attacks? Donald Rumsfeld? Dick Cheney? Karl Rove? General Myers? Rudolph Giuliani? John Ashcroft? George Bush 41 and 43? Benjamin Netanyahu? Richard Perle? General Schumacher? Richard Clarke? Condolezza Rice? Or was it possibly all of the above and more? Either way we need to know.


I apologize if people already knew this stuff, but I couldn`t find anything about the drills on the forum and thought I`d go over it again. Politically this is some of the most damning evidence available against the official myth of al Qaida and 9/11, which is why I think it`s being avoided like the plague by our debunker friends. Let`s shove it right back in their faces where it belongs! The only possible response from the naysayers is either denial or to try and sell this as some form of a massive coincidence. In both cases they have lost before the debate starts, and they know it. That`s why there are no debates about drills on these forums. The reality is that so many drills would NEVER have been arranged on the same day for reasons of security and defense integrity, and no other day in US history has such an amazing concentration of drills. When faced with this incredibly suspicious stuff, what does it even matter what fire does to steel, or whether there were planes or not? 9/11 was an inside job either way, and the drills prove it.
The very real political consequence of exposing the drills, as opposed to other aspects of 9/11, is that public awareness of them means that it will be close to impossible for the US government in particular, and NATO governments in general, to comfortably stage such an elaborate false flag again. They will be too scared to get caught again like they were on 9/11, and as a consequence they are restricted to small actions where the amount and size of the accompanying drills can be kept small enough to escape notice. In a very real way therefore we can save the public from really huge false flag events for a generation by focusing on the 9/11 drills, because they would be nearly impossible to conduit through the bureaucracy without multiple drills and exercises to camouflage them. Making the drills impossible therefore makes terrorism impossible. This makes it well worth our time and effort to all become drill watchers and to make sure as many people as possible know about the 9/11 drills. Above all the presence of drills before and during "terrorist" attacks is one of the clearest signs of a synthetic terrorist event, and indeed they were present in Boston, in London in 05, in Madrid in 04 and in Oklahoma City in 1995. No synthetic terrorism can be performed by NATO governments without drills to hide them from decent, if naive, people in the bureaucracy, and no propaganda can work on people who have noticed this connection between drills and terrorism.
Skimming through, it seems damning enough, apart from the year errors which I've corrected for you.
air_bn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2013, 07:10 PM   #5
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by air_bn View Post
Skimming through, it seems damning enough, apart from the year errors which I've corrected for you.
Thanks for correcting my years there. I thought I remembered them and didn`t bother to look it up like I should have done.

Last edited by skulb; 23-06-2013 at 07:19 PM.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2013, 07:17 PM   #6
air_bn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 3 (2 Posts)
Default

Last paragraph,Madrid was 04, and London 05 easy errors to spot.
air_bn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2013, 07:31 PM   #7
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by air_bn View Post
Last paragraph,Madrid was 04, and London 05 easy errors to spot.
Yeah I found them after posting. Will have the mod fix it when I can get hold of him.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2013, 08:46 AM   #8
sertes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 354
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Thanks a lot, skulb, I just askey you for the same thing in a different thread!

Very, very good.

---

If I can translate it into italian and publish on our top 9/11 Truth website, I'll post here the link.

---

Yet, for the sake of discussion, on point #1 you wrote:

Quote:
Because of Vigilant Guardian the intercept time of the fighter wings assigned to defend the eastern corridor increased from about 7 minutes before and after 9/11 to more than an hour in the case of Flight 77.
The missing interception of Flight 77 is due to Vigilant Guardian AND to another issue: fighters from Langley, scrambled at 9:30 were in the possibility for an interception, and the fact they did not intercept AA77 was not because of Vigilant Guardian, but from a direct order they received, they were diverted from going north toward Washington and were sent east to search for a phantom "flight AA11", which already impacted on the north tower.

Even 9/11 Commission Report confirm this:

Quote:
Radar data show the Langley fighters airborne at 9:30. NEADS decided to keep the Otis fighters over New York. The heading of the Langley fighters was adjusted to send them to the Baltimore area. The mission crew commander explained to us that the purpose was to position the Langley fighters between the reported southbound American 11 and the nation's capital.
Source: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm



Remember at 9:30, according to Mineta testimony under oath, "Vice" President Cheney was aware of the incoming AA77 and in full command as acting president and CiC, and confirmed an order. 7 minutes later, AA77 hit the pentagon killing hundreds. This part of Mineta testimony was left out of 9/11 Commission Report.

...just to connect the dots
__________________
The measurements have indicated that Tower One collapsed in about 11 seconds, and Tower Two collapsed in about 9 seconds. (SHAYM SUNDER, NIST lead investigator)

Last edited by sertes; 24-06-2013 at 12:23 PM.
sertes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2013, 04:06 PM   #9
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sertes View Post
Thanks a lot, skulb, I just askey you for the same thing in a different thread!

Very, very good.

---

If I can translate it into italian and publish on our top 9/11 Truth website, I'll post here the link.

---

Yet, for the sake of discussion, on point #1 you wrote:



The missing interception of Flight 77 is due to Vigilant Guardian AND to another issue: fighters from Langley, scrambled at 9:30 were in the possibility for an interception, and the fact they did not intercept AA77 was not because of Vigilant Guardian, but from a direct order they received, they were diverted from going north toward Washington and were sent east to search for a phantom "flight AA11", which already impacted on the north tower.

Even 9/11 Commission Report confirm this:



Source: http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch1.htm



Remember at 9:30, according to Mineta testimony under oath, "Vice" President Cheney was aware of the incoming AA77 and in full command as acting president and CiC, and confirmed an order. 7 minutes later, AA77 hit the pentagon killing hundreds. This part of Mineta testimony was left out of 9/11 Commission Report.

...just to connect the dots
Good comment. I knew about the MInetta statements and the phantom flight(s), but always assumed it had something to do with Vigilant Guardian. My problem is that there is just so much suspicious information on all sides when it comes to 9/11 it gets hard to limit an article about it
And translate away! The Italian people have suffered as much as anybody from NATO false flag terrorism and the more of them wake up the better.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2013, 04:09 PM   #10
son_of_parrot
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Britannia
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Were these drills on 9/11 unprecedented or have they occured on other dates?
son_of_parrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2013, 04:56 PM   #11
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by son_of_parrot View Post
Were these drills on 9/11 unprecedented or have they occured on other dates?
As far as I know it is the highest concentration on a single day since WW2, if not indeed the entire US history. You need to understand that military, surveillance and security drills are large scale and very expensive events involving thousands and thousands of people. The logistics alone is reason enough to isolate drills as single events or in pairs. On 9/11 you have 15-20 drills going on, involving the entire security, defense and intelligence establishment. I have yet to find s single component of this structure that was not involved in some kind of drill or exercise on that day, and all the drills were in the exact locations and sectors actually hit by the attacks. This just cannot be a coincidence!
But of course it`s a bit tricky to prove my original claim conclusively because you`d have to go back and look at every date in the last century, and most of that will either be in archives or classified, if it`s even available at all. But if you look at the dates for drills and exercises in the years leading up to and the years following 9/11 there is an enormous spike around this date not present in any year in the 90s or the 00s. I once found a chart demonstrating drill frequencies but I am having a hard time remembering where and how to find it again. Perhaps somebody else will remember. For these reasons and others I find it hard to imagine that so many drills have ever been concentrated on a single day, and have yet to hear anybody present any evidence to the contrary. And certainly not during the Cold War, where preparedness and rapid responses were the name of the game. Doing something like this back then would have been treason, because a Russian attack would have been guaranteed to succeed with so much clutter from the drills going on. With the possible exception of WW2 therefore, 9/11 takes the cake. And if you look at WW2 combat actions as drills gone live then I would say that no battle ever came close to the scope of 9/11 even then, with the possible exception of the Normandy and North Africa landings.
The easiest way to make sure is to go to US government websites and look the the drills they do. Find for example a FEMA drill, and look for other institutions and agencies doing drills at the exact same time and you`ll find that it basically never happens at all, or that if it does those outside agencies are baked into the single, main exercise for specific purposes, while still part of the same exercise. On 9/11 they were all active in multiple drills all over the place. This is all the information I need.
What we can be sure of though, is that when a defense system like this is engaging in exercises it will not do so across the board because the exercises create new layers of confusion. So if for example NORAD was to do an exercise it is probable that other institutions and agencies would take over parts of its responsibilities for the duration of the exercise, or that steps be taken to ensure that the agency could do the exercise without creating a window of vulnerability. The more drills you have going on at the same time therefore the more confusion you create, and the more vulnerable you let yourself become.
And the real reason for drills is to camouflage an attack, either from an enemy, as was the case with HILEX 74, or from your own people, as I would argue was the case with 9/11. In general, where a country like the USA does its drills is where it intends to attack or is considering attacking, and countries like Norway will do them where they expect they are most likely to have to defend against an attack. The 9/11 drills took place exactly where the attacks occurred which is very damning whichever way we look at it. In later years there has been a concentration of drills in East Asia, though nowhere near the 9/11 spike, and some US drills in Korea were the underlying reason for DPRK`s saber rattling this winter. The government there knows the purpose of drills and reacted accordingly. But even during these war provocations/military drills there aren`t 15-20 going on all over the place. There is one and then when the first one is over there is another, or there are two going on simultaneously. I think most of the actual 9/11 attack was conducted through the red team exercise components like Amalgam Warrior, Apollo Guardian and Vigilant Warrior, as well as the single (as far as we know) Tripod II in New York. The blue teams of Global Guardian, Amalgam Virgo and Vigilant Guardian were deliberately confused and sabotaged to make sure the attacks were successful. Some components of the blue teams apparently spent as much as an hour not being sure whether the attacks were real or exercise developments and curve balls.
There is a clear tendency for drills to occur in binary pairs because it is common to have a blue team and a red team, or good guys and bad guys. This was the case with Global Guardian/Apollo Guardian and Amalgam Virgo/Amalgam Warrior. Two or even four drills on one day is therefore perfectly normal/not uncommon, particularly with military drills, but more than this certainly is not normal. I was personally involved in a NATO military drill while I served in the Norwegian army (Battle Griffin 96). This single drill was the most enormous thing I have ever taken part in and positively occupied the entire northern part of Norway for two weeks. I can`t even imagine 15 or more of these going on simultaneously, yet that`s what you had on 9/11. The binary drills are the most dangerous in my view, because the red team is supposed to do horrible things within the exercise script and is supposed to keep what it does secret from the blue team. In my experience it was a single drill, but with two sides built into the whole thing anyway, the red team had nuked/bombed Tromsø and were attacking the blue team (me) with planes and total air superiority, forcing us to retreat toward the Swedish border (all fake of course, or even CNN would have reported on it), where I spent 48 hours sitting in a hole in the snow looking for Americans, being threatened with permanent latrine duty if I fell asleep. My point being that I`ve personally seen the scale of these things and understand the structure of binary drills, and that they`re not scantily clad women swirling a pole in front of a marching band, but huge and regional events. The highlight of my personal little experience was successfully shooting down two helicopters with my 20 mm cannon during an ambush, which sadly also was fake. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...xercise-video& for some depressing videos of the event, now that I have gone nostalgic.
Battle Griffin was combined with a submarine drill called Sorbet Royal 96 (it`s possible that this was a red team after all and responsible for bombing Tromsø. But I was in the middle of the woods; cold, tired, hungry and exhausted, and never really had a chance to work it out). Now, Norway has the longest coastline in the world, after Russia, Canada, Chile and Indonesia. A Norwegian naval/marine exercise is therefore a regional event, and apparently that can be covered by two exercises. For a smaller nation, or one less geographically complicated a single exercise would be enough. If you look at a continent as perhaps 5-6 regions, then 10 drills is continent level activity. Logically then, the 15-20 exercises and drills of 9/11 is world war level activity for no apparent reason at all if you go by the official version, which I of course do not. The amount of exercises on 9/11 tells us what scale of conflict the US "security" state had in mind when it arranged 9/11, and this will not have been missed in Moscow and Beijing. If you then add in the nearly 50 exercises and drills on the day as well as leading up to it, the scale of the 9/11 event takes on positively planetary dimensions. And in the middle of all this Hahni Hanjour and his fellow clowns just happened to hijack planes and crash them in New York and the Pentagon, under orders from a deranged Muslim cleric in sandals and a turban from a cave in Afghanistan. US government comedy aside, I believe this is the correct perspective for approaching the 9/11 exercise complex. I also believe that this more than anything else torpedoes the al Qaida myth to the bottom of the sea of historical fabrication where it belongs.

And now I`m ranting...Sorry I can`t provide a more conclusive answer to your question. If I find the chart I mentioned again I will post it.

Last edited by skulb; 24-06-2013 at 10:31 PM.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-06-2013, 06:59 PM   #12
son_of_parrot
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Britannia
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skulb View Post
As far as I know it is the highest concentration on a single day at least since WW2, and indeed the entire US history. You need to understand that military, surveillance and security drills are large scale and very expensive events involving thousands and thousands of people. The logistics alone is reason enough to isolate drills as single events or in pairs. On 9/11 you have 15-20 drills going on, involving the entire security, defense and intelligence establishment. I have yet to find s single component of this structure that was not involved in some kind of drill or exercise on that day, and all the drills were in the exact locations and sectors actually hit by the attacks. This just cannot be a coincidence!
But of course it`s a bit tricky to prove my original claim conclusively because you`d have to go back and look at every date in the last century, and most of that will either be in archives or classified, if it`s even available at all. If you look at the dates for drills and exercises in the years leading up to and the years following 9/11 there is an enormous spike around this date not present in any year in the 90s or the 00s. I once found a chart demonstrating drill frequencies but I am having a hard time remembering where and how to find it again. Perhaps somebody else will remember. For these reasons and others I find it hard to imagine that so many drills have ever been concentrated on a single day, and have yet to hear anybody present any evidence to the contrary. And certainly not during the Cold War, where preparedness and rapid responses were the name of the game. Doing something like this back then would have been treason, because a Russian attack would have been guaranteed to succeed with so much clutter from the drills going on. With the possible exception of WW2 therefore, 9/11 takes the cake. And if you look at WW2 combat actions as drills gone live then I would say that no battle ever came close to the scope of 9/11 even then, with the possible exception of the Normandy and North Africa landings.
The easiest way to make sure is to go to US government websites and look the the drills they do. Find for example a FEMA drill, and look for other institutions and agencies doing drills at the exact same time and you`ll find that it basically never happens at all, or that if it does those outside agencies are baked into the single, main exercise for specific purposes, while still part of the same exercise. On 9/11 they were all active in multiple drills all over the place. This is all the information I need.
What we can be sure of though, is that when a defense system like this is engaging in exercises it will not do so across the board because the exercises create new layers of confusion. So if for example NORAD was to do an exercise it is probable that other institutions and agencies would take over parts of its responsibilities for the duration of the exercise, or that steps be taken to ensure that the agency could do the exercise without creating a window of vulnerability. The more drills you have going on at the same time therefore the more confusion you create, and the more vulnerable you let yourself become.
And the real reason for drills is to camouflage an attack, either from an enemy, as was the case with HILEX 74, or from your own people, as I would argue was the case with 9/11. In general, where a country like the USA does its drills is where it intends to attack or is considering attacking. In later years there has been a concentration of drills in East Asia, though nowhere near the 9/11 spike, and some US drills in Korea were the underlying reason for DPRK`s saber rattling this winter. The government there knows the purpose of drills and reacted accordingly. But even during these war provocations/military drills there aren`t 15-20 going on all over the place. There is one and then when the first one is over there is another, or there are two going on simultaneously. I think most of the actual 9/11 attack was conducted through the red team drill components like Amalgam Warrior, Apollo Guardian and Vigilant Warrior, as well as the single (as far as we know) Tripod II in New York. The blue teams of Global Guardian, Amalgam Virgo and Vigilant Guardian were deliberately confused and sabotaged to make sure the attacks were successful. Some components of the blue teams apparently spent as much as an hour not being sure whether the attacks were real or exercise developments and curve balls.
There is a clear tendency for drills to occur in binary pairs because it is common to have a blue team and a red team, or good guys and bad guys. This was the case with Global Guardian/Apollo Guardian and Amalgam Virgo/Amalgam Warrior. Two or even four drills on one day is therefore perfectly normal/not uncommon, particularly with military drills, but more than this certainly is. I was personally involved in a NATO military drill while I served in the Norwegian army (Battle Griffin 96). This single drill was the most enormous thing I have ever taken part in and positively occupied the entire northern part of Norway for two weeks. I can`t even imagine 15 or more of these going on simultaneously, yet that`s what you had on 9/11. The binary drills are the most dangerous in my view, because the red team is supposed to do horrible things within the exercise script and is supposed to keep what it does secret from the blue team. In my experience it was a single drill, but with two sides built into the whole thing anyway, the red team had nuked/bombed Tromsø and were attacking the blue team (me) with planes and total air superiority, forcing us to retreat toward the Swedish border (all fake of course, or even CNN would have reported on it), where I spent 48 hours sitting in a hole in the snow looking for Americans, being threatened with permanent latrine duty if I fell asleep. My point being that I`ve personally seen the scale of these things and understand the structure of binary drills, and that they`re not scantily clad women swirling a pole in front of a marching band, but huge and regional events. The highlight of my personal little experience was successfully shooting down two helicopters with my 20 mm cannon during an ambush, which sadly also was fake. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...xercise-video& for some depressing videos of the event, now that I have gone nostalgic.
Battle Griffin was combined with a submarine drill called Sorbet Royal 96 (it`s possible that this was a red team after all and responsible for bombing Tromsø. But I was in the middle of the woods, tired, hungry and exhausted, and never really had a chance to find out). Now, Norway has the longest coastline in the world, after Russia, Canada, Chile and Indonesia. A Norwegian naval/marine exercise is therefore a regional event, and apparently that can be covered by two exercises. For a smaller nation, or one less geographically complicated a single exercise would be enough. If you look at a continent as perhaps 5-6 regions, then 10 drills is continent level activity. Logically then, the 15-20 exercises and drills of 9/11 is world war level activity for no apparent reason at all if you go by the official version, which I of course do not. The amount of exercises on 9/11 tells us what scale of conflict the US "security" state had in mind when it arranged 9/11, and this will not have been missed in Moscow and Beijing.

And now I`m ranting...Sorry I can`t provide a more conclusive answer to your question. If I find the chart I mentioned again I will post it.
Thanks for the reply Skulb.

Of course I know 9/11 was an "inside" job carried out by the global intelligence agencies but its always good to have even more info like you have supplied to further back up my opinion.

Thanks again.
son_of_parrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 12:48 PM   #13
homervb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 162
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by son_of_parrot View Post
Were these drills on 9/11 unprecedented or have they occured on other dates?
I remember hearing multiple times that these drills were usually scheduled in October but for some reason were pushed up to September. I could be wrong, not sure. Either way though for this to be absolute coincidence is just beyond logical to me lol

Last edited by homervb; 25-06-2013 at 12:49 PM.
homervb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 01:13 PM   #14
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by homervb View Post
I remember hearing multiple times that these drills were usually scheduled in October but for some reason were pushed up to September. I could be wrong, not sure. Either way though for this to be absolute coincidence is just beyond logical to me lol

I think they move around, but traditionally war related drills like Northern Vigilance tend to happen during spring, while in 01 even those took place right on 9/11. And it`s not just the concentration either, but the content of the drills themselves. My God, every single part of what took place was in the drills. You`d have to be pretty soused not to notice that there`s something really wrong here, when you get this stuff pointed out.
There`s a really good reason you never hear about the drills and WTC 7 on CNN
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 11:48 AM   #15
homervb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 162
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skulb View Post
I think they move around, but traditionally war related drills like Northern Vigilance tend to happen during spring, while in 01 even those took place right on 9/11. And it`s not just the concentration either, but the content of the drills themselves. My God, every single part of what took place was in the drills. You`d have to be pretty soused not to notice that there`s something really wrong here, when you get this stuff pointed out.
There`s a really good reason you never hear about the drills and WTC 7 on CNN
I remember discussing this with some shills over on AboveTopSecret and they all were just like "nahhh it was complete coincidence. the drills had no impact on the response"...righttttttttttt lol
homervb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 12:32 PM   #16
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by homervb View Post
I remember discussing this with some shills over on AboveTopSecret and they all were just like "nahhh it was complete coincidence. the drills had no impact on the response"...righttttttttttt lol
Well, you notice that we`re up to 518 views and so far none of the resident shills have honored us with a visit here. They`re either shell shocked or plugging like mad at one of the shill sites to look for fake arguments.
It`s this stuff and then there`s WTC 7. There`s just no way they can explain it and not look like complete maroons. All they can really do is insult us.

Last edited by skulb; 26-06-2013 at 12:33 PM.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 04:07 PM   #17
awake canuck
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

great thread skulb!

showing sept 11 is such an outlier scares me to think of the complexity of the evil doers. I assume it is no trivial matter to basically have the nation defenseless on sept 11.
awake canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 04:13 PM   #18
awake canuck
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

in addition to no air defense that day as the drills had moved a lot of intercept aircraft out of key bases, one thing that has always troubled me is I cannot believe the pentagon had no short range air defense. (anti-aircraft missiles, SAM's, flak guns, rifles or even squirt guns) arguably the pentagon is one of the most important military structures in the world and no defenses? you can simply fly a 'plane' into it, unchallenged?
awake canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 07:07 PM   #19
skulb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 643
Likes: 35 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by awake canuck View Post
in addition to no air defense that day as the drills had moved a lot of intercept aircraft out of key bases, one thing that has always troubled me is I cannot believe the pentagon had no short range air defense. (anti-aircraft missiles, SAM's, flak guns, rifles or even squirt guns) arguably the pentagon is one of the most important military structures in the world and no defenses? you can simply fly a 'plane' into it, unchallenged?
Of course it has AA guns. It also has multiple air bases circling it which should be on standby to react to any incursion into the no fly zone over DC, and it has multiple security cameras lining all the outer walls and light pole cameras outside that (you could even see them in Google Earth and count them yourself previously, but it`s now been replaced by a placeholder) all around it which allegedly "malfunctioned" on 9/11.
The real mystery of 9/11 is why anybody would believe any of the crap we were told by Washington in the first place.
skulb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 11:22 PM   #20
alljokesaside
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 514
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

elements within every government of every nation of the world know that 9/11 was
an inside job. (and moreover know that it was mired in fakery, with a belgian politician
recently remarking (on the record on camera and in parliament) that 9/11 was 'made up'-
which it was, with fake video, witnesses, reporting, victims etc. (there are 1,200 bodies
completely unaccounted for from the twin towers rubble - consider they were not there
in the first place - consider also all the concurrent drills and exercises that day
to carry the illusion).
the fact that none have spoken out on this and simply allowed American and Britain (and others)
their middle eastern rampage speaks volume about the levels of control the world as a
whole is really under (the auspices of the Roman Empire).

(a thought just struck: what if the official 9/11 story (and all it's details) are simply
the played out 9/11 war-game scenario and not-real-world exercises final report or
outcome or fantasy assessment of this fantasy scenario that so many were engaged
in? it might be our mistake to take it as representing reality (remember there is no
legal obligation on the newsmedia (which they own) to report the truth).
if this was the case then you can be sure (they do rely on their legalese which
allows them to keep everything above board and in accordance with common or
natural law) that all the necessary paperwork detailing what is exactly the
real situation is in place and recorded and understood at the appropriate locations
and at the appropriate levels.
i believe private and legal arrangements were put in place seperately to take down
the towers efficiently, safely and without injury - all the victims were created or
generated identities for the purposes of the 9/11 war-game exercise).
alljokesaside is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.