Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Today's News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2015, 02:01 PM   #1
onenarrowdoor
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 321
Likes: 28 (17 Posts)
Default Prince Andrew - serious allegations

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...t-9954198.html

Quote:
A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage. . .

. . . Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the allegations. The palace can't give comment about an ongoing legal process, a spokesperson said.

Last edited by Getagrip; 02-01-2015 at 02:12 PM. Reason: Adding detail
onenarrowdoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:05 PM   #2
onenarrowdoor
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 321
Likes: 28 (17 Posts)
Default

Strangely, the Mirror piece only appeared on Facebook for 14 minutes before disappearing.
onenarrowdoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:07 PM   #3
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
"A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multi-millionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl in 2008, reports the Guardian.

The prince is not a named party in the legal claim, and has not had any opportunity to respond to the allegations. He has previously denied any sexual contact with young women associated with Epstein or any knowledge of his behaviour."

There needs to be a "Screaming from the top of your lungs" emoticon.

I just watched this in the Russell Burton doc about Jim So-Vile. Oh, and this story, while shocking, is not even the tip of that iceberg. Still..... we're one step from "Just How Well Did The Royals Know Jimmy Savile?" with a pic of Jim and Charlie smiling and laughing together....

(A very weak attempt at damage control should be here soon..... if they don't it's very telling IMO. Sick f*****s...)
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:08 PM   #4
andy1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 1,537 (885 Posts)
Default

Will be interesting to see what happens.
__________________
"You put 10 tonnes of proof in front of people, if they are not ready to accept an idea, they will not accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury."
William Cooper - behold a pale horse video
^^
So true
andy1033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:08 PM   #5
rhydra
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 8,828
Likes: 133 (70 Posts)
Default

I can't see anything coming of this, you never know though, but don't expect much.
__________________
Man is a tool created by the Universe to mark time.
rhydra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:11 PM   #6
andy1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 1,537 (885 Posts)
Default

Yep remember they own the police, so who is going to enforce the law, if any was broken.
__________________
"You put 10 tonnes of proof in front of people, if they are not ready to accept an idea, they will not accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury."
William Cooper - behold a pale horse video
^^
So true
andy1033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:21 PM   #7
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onenarrowdoor View Post
Strangely, the Mirror piece only appeared on Facebook for 14 minutes before disappearing.
Really? Let's recreate it here, with pics and everything.



Quote:
Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit over claims of forced sexual relations




Prince named as part of case related to banker Jeffrey Epstein

ANDREW GRIFFIN Friday 02 January 2015

A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage.

The accusation was made in a lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multi-millionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl in 2008, reports the Guardian.

The prince is not a named party in the legal claim, and has not had any opportunity to respond to the allegations. He has previously denied any sexual contact with young women associated with Epstein or any knowledge of his behaviour.



Jeffrey Epstein, multi-millionaire and ex-banker who was sentenced to 18 months in prison

Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the allegations to The Independent. The palace can't give comment about an ongoing legal process, a spokesperson said.

More to follow
This really does damage to anyone suggesting that Prince Andrew's connection to this man is careless or frivolous. There's obviously a real pathology at work with the "Royal" family of inbred, psychopathic pedo-hebo-infantophiles and murderers.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:39 PM   #8
busa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 17,812
Likes: 2,549 (1,315 Posts)
Default

Covered here too:

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...ex-allegations
__________________
All living things will want to be present for this day when time ends, and we enter the forever cycle of the Fifth World...
Then, one morning in a moment, we will awaken to the Red Dawn. The sky will be the color of blood..."

Ghostwolf & the Hopi Elders
busa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:00 PM   #9
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhydra View Post
I can't see anything coming of this, you never know though, but don't expect much.
You know something? It's not about the courts, or the current system in England doing anything about this -- we know they won't. It's about informing the people at large until it becomes patently obvious that these "people" have been literally "having their way" with whatever and whoever they want knowing full well the media and law favors them.

I like to think of it as germinating the seeds of revolution. Eventually the info will overwhelm the hypnosis and conditioning of the masses. I fully believe it. Folks will eventually realize that they have to take matters into their own hands because the system they are taught to believe in is broken beyond repair and it favors the worst criminals.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:07 PM   #10
chipstyxx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 4 (2 Posts)
Default

This has been around for a while but it for some reason now the papers aren't so keen to print the picture of Andy with one of the Epstien's girls and her account of a night with him.


Quote:
......She has already spoken publicly of her ordeal once, in a 2011 interview with a British newspaper. Back then, she told how she’d been paid $200 a time to grant sexual favours to Epstein from 1998 onwards, and revealed that he’d introduced her to Prince Andrew on at least three occasions.
In 2001, aged 17, she had danced with the Prince at London’s Tramp nightclub, she said, and had sat on his knee at a house party in New York. Later that year, she’d spent time with him at Little St James, a private island Epstein owns in the Caribbean.
After the first encounter, Jeffrey Epstein paid Roberts $15,000 in cash. A photo taken at the time showed Andrew standing in his shirtsleeves with an arm round her bare midriff. There is, however, no suggestion that the Duke was involved in any form of sexual exploitation.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3NfzOg1xZ
So he was great friends with this perv and stayed at his various houses were he allegedly had pictures of these girls (similar age to his daughters) all over the place and he never noticed anything untoward or made use of the facilities. He should be questioned.

Andrew is pictured with one of Epstien's girls/victims and Ghislane Maxwell who has allegedly been described as a high society madame. Usually when you see a pimp, a prostitute and a man together only one situation springs to mind really.

Last edited by chipstyxx; 02-01-2015 at 03:13 PM.
chipstyxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:44 PM   #11
doctor fish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 17 (11 Posts)
Default Prince Andrew strongly denies 'underage sex slave'

Prince Andrew strongly denies 'underage sex slave' allegations after being named in lawsuit filed in U.S. court papers

No comments allowed on the Daily HATE site as expected


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ers-claim.html

__________________
Question Everything!

Last edited by doctor fish; 02-01-2015 at 03:45 PM.
doctor fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:48 PM   #12
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

What else was he going to do? It's too bad Savile died -- he'd have made a great character witness for Andy.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:52 PM   #13
doctor fish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 17 (11 Posts)
Default

WHY IS MY POST DUMPED IN HERE!????


Well worthy of TODAYS news.

Most folk dont visit this section.

Admin!???
__________________
Question Everything!
doctor fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 03:57 PM   #14
lobuk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Roger That
Posts: 21,944
Likes: 3,706 (2,108 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctor fish View Post
WHY IS MY POST DUMPED IN HERE!????


Well worthy of TODAYS news.

Most folk dont visit this section.

Admin!???
It was merged because there was already a thread created covering the exact same story just 1 hour before yours. There is no point in having duplicate threads. It is always worth checking to see if a story has been already posted first before creating a new thread which is covered in the posting guidelines for Todays News.

The merged thread has been moved into Todays News now which was occurring anyway if you had waited a few more minutes.

Last edited by lobuk; 02-01-2015 at 04:01 PM.
lobuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:04 PM   #15
annieapple
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The orchard.
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 259 (132 Posts)
Default

I expect an announcement of scurrilous and untrue allegations and threats to sue the cheeks off anyone who says anything about it. The same as the innocent Lord McAlpine did because Andrew is as innocent as Lord McAlpine.
annieapple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:17 PM   #16
Ooberman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: London
Posts: 4,348
Likes: 2,635 (1,245 Posts)
Default

'Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

A woman named him in documents she filed in a Florida case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sex offences in 2008.

She claims that between 1999 and 2002 she was forced to have sex with the prince when she was a minor.

The palace said it would not comment in detail on the legal proceedings.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party.

"As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with under age minors is categorically untrue"....'

That is from the BBC, now move along now. Nothing to see here.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629
Ooberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:19 PM   #17
greatdayforfreedom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 682 (328 Posts)
Default

2015 is off to a GREAT start, isn't it? I hope this story is a sign of things to come!
__________________
''I started a journey 25 years ago and I'm bloody well gonna finish it. And it will only end when I do'' - David Icke.

Last edited by greatdayforfreedom; 02-01-2015 at 04:30 PM.
greatdayforfreedom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:32 PM   #18
annieapple
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The orchard.
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 259 (132 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdayforfreedom View Post
2015 is off to a GREAT start, isn't it? I hope this story is a sign of things to come!
Yes, worth another party!
annieapple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:35 PM   #19
busa
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 17,812
Likes: 2,549 (1,315 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ooberman View Post
'Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

A woman named him in documents she filed in a Florida case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sex offences in 2008.

She claims that between 1999 and 2002 she was forced to have sex with the prince when she was a minor.

The palace said it would not comment in detail on the legal proceedings.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "This relates to long-standing and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party.

"As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with under age minors is categorically untrue"....'

That is from the BBC, now move along now. Nothing to see here.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629
If Andrew is named in the law suit, then he is part of the proceedings.
Royals struggle with the concept of law don't they?
__________________
All living things will want to be present for this day when time ends, and we enter the forever cycle of the Fifth World...
Then, one morning in a moment, we will awaken to the Red Dawn. The sky will be the color of blood..."

Ghostwolf & the Hopi Elders
busa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 04:36 PM   #20
rj macready
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 746
Likes: 26 (6 Posts)
Default

Just out of interest could a member of the royal family actually be taken to court or charged with a crime?
rj macready is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.