Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Political Manipulation / Cover-Ups / False Flags

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28-04-2018, 10:34 PM   #1
techman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 1,046 (572 Posts)
Default The assasination of Princess Diana

Was reading another fascinating article from John Hamer (author of Falsification of History), in which talked about the "alleged" assassination of Princess Diana. I'm assuming most people on here are of the opinion that she was indeed murdered by whatever intelligence organisation on behalf of the British Royal Family. What the true reasons for her death is is another debate, but personally I go with Icke and others theories regarding the ritual aspect and her being an homage to the goddess Diana.

I've heard most of the varying theories of that night and the odd circumstances surrounding the lack of back up protection, the Mercedes heading the long route, no CCTV working in the tunnels, etc. At one point in the article Hamer mentions someone he knows, or knew, who states catergorically that during the first newsflash shortly after the crash, the person said they saw footage of Diana, looking dazed and shocked but otherwise OK, walking into the back of the ambulance.

I've heard theories that she was sacrificed in the tunnel, and other theories that she died in the ambulance on her slow journey to the hospital, which inexplicably took over an hour. I don't know about the pregnant suggestion, but could be true I suppose, but I don't believe she was taken out because of that.

Last edited by techman; 28-04-2018 at 10:36 PM.
techman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2018, 01:38 PM   #2
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1,186 (693 Posts)
Default

I have already posted most of this information on the murder of Lady Di, Diana Frances Spencer, Princess of Wales first in another thread. Maybe this is a good moment to put it all in one thread…
More than 20 years after Lady Diana was murdered in Paris, she is rarely out of the news.
The most informative site I found on the murder of Diana is this one: http://www.public-interest.co.uk/diana/diexposed.htm


Diana not visibly injured
I have found 2 photographs of Diana alive after the crash and not looking injured, which you can see directly below (the man in white is Doctor Frederic Mailliez).


The state media never released the pictures that showed that Diana didn’t look injured, but instead the following (fake) photograph was shown.


The first medical doctor on the scene of the crash was Doctor Frederic Mailliez (who arrived on the scene with his friend Mark Butt), who provided Diana with first aid in the Alma tunnel.
Paparazzo Romuald Rat and his driver Stephane Darmon arrived at the scene before Mailliez; Rat opened the door where he saw Diana laying on the floor of the car, took her pulse and spoke some soothing words to her.

Mailliez provided Diana with oxygen as he concluded that she had problems breathing, because of the position of her body and that she was unconscious. He further stated that she didn’t look badly injured and expected that she would survive.
You can hear Frederic Mailliez say this in the documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" (2007): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1YtUqz0xNY

You can go to the time stamps if you only want to watch what Mailliez said.
11:04 – 11:20:
Quote:
she [Diana] didn’t have any blood on her face, but she was unconscious and her head was down like that and she had difficulty to breathe, so she needed some assistance very quickly.
15:56 – 16:06:
Quote:
I thought this beautiful woman had a good chance to live because I thought it was just a head injury.
This documentary is more about the paparazzi than about the murder of Diana (it implies that the photographers were unjustly blamed for the death). Several photographers say that they were harassed by the French police to give up their pictures of the car wreck with Diana in it.


Witnesses saw motorcycles, a dark car, and a light flash
According to the Paget report Thierry Hackett, Alain Remy, Christophe Lascaux, Lionel Ronssin, the three members of the Catheline family, David Le Ny, James Huth, Olivier Partouche, Clifford Gooroovadoo, Belkacem Bouzid, Abdelatif Redjil and Gary Dean saw flashes of light in the area of the Mercedes S280before it crashed: http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/...ana_report.pdf

The Paget report is 871 pages, here are some interesting excerpts: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...na/9qOkYUkUhrM
(archived here: http://archive.is/mpESD)

Francois Levistre entered the tunnel ahead of Brenda Wells:
Quote:
In my rearview mirror, I saw the car (Mercedes 280s) in the middle of the tunnel with a motorcycle on its left, pulling ahead and then swerving to the right directly in front of the car (the Mercedes). As the motorcycle swerved and before the car lost control, there was a flash of light. But then I was out of the tunnel and heard, but did not see, the impact.
I immediately pulled my car over to the curb, but my wife said: 'Let's get out of here. It's a terrorist attack.' There were two people on the motorcycle.
Roselyne Levistre, wife of François, didn’t see the bright flash but did see a motorcycle with two people on board.

Levy added that he saw a powerful bike with two men exit the tunnel immediately after the crash:
Quote:
Already at that point, as I was travelling at 120km/hr, I could see in the distance in my rear view mirror a vehicle surrounded on either side by motorbikes. I said to my wife : “That must be someone important”. I joined the embankment via a slip-road and the convoy drew closer. I accelerated on leaving the slip-road and went into the tunnel, the one at the Alma Bridge with pillars in the middle. I would add that there was a white car between me and the convoy. I realized that the motorbikes were not police motorbikes, as there were no flashing lights. There were more than two motorbikes, travelling in tandem on each side of the car. As I was about to start to climb out of the tunnel, I could distinctly see one motorbike cut across the front of the car. There was a large white flash. I did not notice a bang. I saw the car zigzagging. I carried on driving until I was outside the tunnel, where I stopped to collect my thoughts. I realised that something serious had happened, and that the car had had an accident. I thought it might have been an assassination attempt or a gangland hit. I left, as I did not want to get involved in any more trouble. Immediately afterwards, I saw a motorbike coming out of the tunnel. It was a powerful machine, with two people on board
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...in-tunnel.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/34Xx8)

London-born Brenda Wells:
Quote:
After a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big car. Afterwards in the tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes. After that, a black car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped and five or six motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs. They were crying 'It's Diana'.
American tourist Brian Anderson:
Quote:
As I noticed the back of the Mercedes going past, that's when I saw the first of three motorbikes. The space between our car and the Mercedes I would estimate at about 5 to 6 feet. Both our taxi and the Mercedes were travelling in the same direction in our designated lanes. I have numbered the motorbikes on the sketch plan as 1, 2 and 3.
It was motorbike 3 that my attention was first drawn to. It was to the left of our taxi and just to the rear of the Mercedes. It was at this point that the noise fell into place. This motorbike was driven by a single person. This motorbike was about 2 feet from the back of the Mercedes, and was accelerating past our taxi also. I thought that the rider was able to get a lot of response from his bike.
The Mercedes past us and I then became aware of a second bike, which I have marked number 1 on the sketch plan. This was a bike which had a passenger on the rear. I noticed this bike was accelerating on and off the throttle and was to the rear left hand side of the Mercedes as it travelled forward. It appeared that it was trying to get in between the Mercedes and the low kerb in the centre of the road, which separated our two lanes from traffic flow in the opposite direction.
I remember at this point saying to the taxi driver "The guys fucking crazy". I was referring to the driver of motorcycle number 1. The Mercedes got further ahead of us and I now had a very clear view of the back of the Mercedes through the front windscreen of the taxi. I then saw the 3rd motorcycle which I have marked as number 2 on my sketch plan.
At the point when I first saw it, it was behind the Mercedes to its centre. I would estimate that motorbike 1 when I first saw it was almost touching the back of the Mercedes. The left of the Mercedes was only about a foot and a half from the central low kerb I have described and there was no way in my opinion that the driver of this bike was going to be able to pass the Mercedes in between it and the low kerb. It was seeing this that prompted my reaction to the taxi driver.
I would estimate that motorbike 2 was about 3 to 4 feet from the rear of the Mercedes. The bikes were in a cluster, like a swarm around the Mercedes. At this point, I just thought nothing of it, as it would not be uncommon to see this type of aggressive behaviour in the US. I was watching what was going on through the front windscreen”
(...)
It was at this point that from greater intensity from my left eye, I saw a flash coming from what I thought was in front of us. This flash looked like out of place light. I could not give an estimation as to the distance of the source of the flash, but it was an intense flash. I liken it to be so bright like magnesium igniting.
Jacques Morel:
Quote:
There was an almighty bang and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realized there had been a crash. My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me!
Olivier Partouche saw the Mercedes behind a dark coloured car that he described as a Ford Mondeo and pursued by a motorcycle.
Olivier Partouche:
Quote:
J'ai vu deux vehicules. Le premier roulait de facon a ralentir la Mercedes. C'etait une voiture de couleur sombre de type Ford Mondeo. La Mercedes collait cette voiture. Peut-etre a 150 kilometres a l'heure.
Deriere la Mercedes, il y avait une moto. J'ai compris que le chauffeur retrogradait pour reprendre de la puissance. Dans ce cas-la, en tant que professionel, je peux dire que la voiture reagit en faisant un bond en avant violent. C'est ce qui a du se produire car j'ai entendu le crissement des pneus et le choc. Il me semble avoir vu des flashs avant l'entree du tunnel.
According to Gaelle l’Hostis:
Quote:
As we entered the Alma tunnel, we heard a loud noise of screeching tires. At that moment, in the opposite lane, we saw a large car approaching at high speed. This car swerved to the left, then went back to the right and crashed into the wall with its horn blaring. I should note that in front of this car, there was another, smaller car. I think this vehicle was black, but I'm not sure. Behind the big car there was a large motorcycle. I can't be sure how many riders were on it.
Mark Butt, who arrived on the scene with Frederic Mailliez, said that as they approached the tunnel from the west, they saw a motorcycle with a single rider emerge from the east, it stopped, made a U-turn and drove against the direction of traffic back into the tunnel.

Gary Hunter, a London lawyer, witnessed 2 cars traveling with high speed from his the window of his third-floor hotel room, less than 100 yards from the Alma tunnel in the direction of the British Embassy:
Quote:
I was watching television when I heard the crash at exactly 12:25 a.m. There was an almighty crash followed by the sound of skidding, then another crash. My initial thought was that there had been a head-on collision. I went to the window and saw people running towards the tunnel.
Seconds later, Hunter saw a car on the Rue Jean Goujon coming from the Alma tunnel:
Quote:
I heard a screeching of tires. I saw a small dark car turning the corner at the top of the road. I would say it was racing at 60-70 mph.
My own feeling is that these were people in a hurry not to be there. I am confident that car was getting off the scene. It was obvious they were getting away from something and that they were in a hurry. It looked quite sinister. I can't recall the type of car, but it was a small dark vehicle. It could have been a Fiat Uno or a Renault.
Hunter said the car was being shadowed by a white Mercedes.


Richard Tomlinson, Soldier N – SAS/MI6 hitmen
There have been at least 2 special agents that have described that Diana was murdered by MI6/SAS.

Richard Tomlinson’s contract with MI6 was terminated in April 1995. Richard Tomlinson since then has been repeatedly arrested for the “public” interest, particularly to let him speak about his suspicions that Diana MI6 was involved in the murder of Diana. Tomlinson was for example arrested on 31 July 1998 by DST to prevent him from talking to Judge Hervé Stephan to prevent him from speaking out on the murder of Diana (when they handled him so rough that he got a broken rib).

Tomlinson has described that MI6 uses light flashes to cause “accidents”. Richard Tomlinson specifically described that he saw a plan to get rid of Milosevic using light flashes to make him crash in a tunnel in Geneva.
Tomlinson also writes that he was shown a portable strobe flash gun during training.
Tomlinson has said that the ploy to make Diana crash looks very similar to the plan to Murder Milosevic by blinding the driver with a flash of light.
Tomlinson also told about the strong connections between the Royal family and MI6: http://www.globalresearch.ca/mi6-and...ess-diana/8085
(archived here: http://archive.is/peUQm)

In September 2011, the UK Police received a seven-page letter from the former mother-in-law of a SAS sniper, Soldier N, who boasted to his wife that his unit had "arranged Princess Diana’s death".
The letter was entered as evidence during the trial of the room mate of Soldier N – Danny Nightingale.
The letter says:
Quote:
He also told her (his wife) that it was the XXX who arranged Princess Diana’s death and that has been covered up.
The wife of Soldier N remarked to him how sad it was that Prince William’s mother had been killed, to which he reportedly replied:
Quote:
As a matter of fact, it was the Regiment that did it.
Soldier N said the name of the shadowy unit within the SAS responsible for “lethal operations” is “The Increment for the purposes of carrying out lethal operations on behalf of MI6”.

In early 2012, a SAS officer handed the ex-wife of Soldier N a brown envelope with £500 to which he added that she should never discuss the payment, or discuss the Diana claim with anyone.
In June 2013 she was threatened that if she would speak out in favour of Nightingale at his trial, she could end up dead like Lee Rigby. Theresa Lumby was present when she was threatened in this way.
Simon McKay, Nightingale’s solicitor, confirmed that Theresa Lumby heard a conversation, in which the SAS officer “touched on the fate of the Woolwich soldier Lee Rigby”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...er-claims.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/Xdxlg)


White Fiat Uno – Le Van
It has been confirmed that a white Fiat Uno was seen at the scene of the car crash that was never found. Some people claim this was the car of James Andanson. This is very unlikely.
On the crashed Mercedes, paint of a white Fiat Uno (Bianco Corfu 224) build between 1983 and 1987 was found. James Andanson owned a white Fiat Uno from 1988.
Furthermore a paparazzo wouldn’t chase a fast heavy built Mercedes in a Fiat Uno.
James Andanson provided evidence (toll tickets) that confirmed that on the night Diana died he was at home with his wife in Lignieres 170 miles south from Paris. Andanson also said that his Fiat Uno couldn’t be driven because it was broken down.

According to the following article, Le Van Thanh was driving his white Fiat Uno in the Alma tunnel in Paris when the Mercedes with Diana and Dodi crashed. According to his father Francois, Le Van immediately asked his brother Dung to repaint his car after that faithful August night in 1997.
Le Van said that the crash had ruined his life.
Several witnesses have stated that they saw a large dark dog in the back seat of the white Fiat Uno, and Le Van has confirmed that this Rottweiler was in the rear of the car: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ath-crash.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/tuccK)


Mercedes sabotaged
I don’t rate the documentary “Who killed Diana? ” very high except for the interview with John Macnamara (from 27:12 - 28:14), director security of Harrods, who did his own investigation for Mohamed Al-Fayed.
Macnamara tells that the news that the speedometer was stuck at 192 km/h (120 miles per hour), was a blatant lie. Mercedes immediately had this “news” refuted: a speedometer goes to 0 after a crash.
John Macnamara also tells that the headline that Henri Paul had 3 times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood came out even before the blood had been analysed.

I’ve tried to find more information (text or video) of John Macnamara on the murder of Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed. The best I’ve found is this transcript from CNN of Macnamara and attorney Mark Zaid:
Quote:
In fact, within 36 hours it was proclaimed that Henri Paul was as drunk as a pig, three times over the drink-drive limit, driving at 192 kilometers, 120 miles an hour. Now, that was a statement that was categorically put out in the French and British press. We now know -- in fact, we knew within hours that the speedometer in the Mercedes reverts to zero on impact, so their allegation that it was stuck at 192 kilometers an hour was false -- it was a deliberate false statement
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/30/tl.00.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/J584e)

Also interesting in “Who killed Diana? ” is that from 36:53 – 37:03 the voice over tells that the Mercedes had been stolen 3 months earlier and had the electronics ripped out and replaced (possibly with electronics for remote takeover of the car.
The following story writes that shortly before the “accident” the Mercedes was stolen, in which time they could have tampered with the brakes or even could have installed technology to take over the car by remote control. The onboard computer chip was stolen and then could have been replaced with a new “special” one: http://princess-diana-life-n-death.b...of-stolen.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/Z2NiZ)

David Price inspected the car in which Diana crashed.
Price couldn’t disprove tampering because a foot-long section of brake pipe was not handed over to British investigators.
The car’s brake fluid contained a level of water that could have interfered with braking efficiency, according to the Paget report this was caused by contamination after the crash. I don’t understand where this water could have come from…
According to the Paget report Diana couldn’t wear her seatbelt because it was “jammed in the retracted position because part of the internal mechanism had become displaced”.
Chauffeur Olivier Lafaye drove the Mercedes car hours before the crash and reported the back end “slewing out” at speed: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/424...e-not-revealed
(archived here: http://archive.is/SwJa3)


Diana afraid to me killed – seatbelt
In October 1993, Lady Diana already told that she feared to be murdered in a car crash by Prince Charles. She sent a letter to her butler Paul Burrell in which she writes that she will be murdered by Charles, who is “planning “an accident” in my car (...) to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy” (Tiggy Legge-Bourke, former nanny of Princes William and Harry).


In 1995, Diana wrote a letter to her friend Simone Simmons:
Quote:
Dear Simone, as you know, the brakes of my car have been tampered with. If something does happen to me it will be MI5 or MI6 who will have done it. Lots of love, Diana.
Simone Simmons, testified that former Defence Minister, Nicholas Soames, called Diana at Kensington Palace in February 1997 and threatened Diana. Diana asked her to listen in on the telephone conversation, when she heard Soames say: "Don't meddle in things you know nothing about because you know accidents can happen".
Soames has denied these allegations: http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/19704...a_threat_call/
(archived here: http://archive.is/IKKZb)

In October 1995, Diana had a meeting with her lawyers Lord Mischon, Maggie Rae and Sandra Davies (of law firm Mischon De Reya), where she said that unnamed “reliable sources” had informed her that she could be killed or injured in a car accident.
Mischon advised Diana to increase “security measures … relating to her car”.Mischon wrote in a summary of this meeting that he didn’t believe her life was in danger. He was surprised that her private secretary Patrick Jephson "half believed" Diana was right that her safety was at risk:
Quote:
Efforts would be made if not to get rid of her (be it by some accident in her car, such as a pre-prepared brake failure or whatever) at least to see she was so injured as to be declared unbalanced. She was convinced that there was a conspiracy and that she and Camilla were to be ‘put aside’
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/h...shcon_note.pdf

Within 2 weeks after the car crash in the tunnel, Mischon took his note to Commissioner Lord Condon, who kept it “confidential”. Only after Paul Burrell in 2003 released a handwritten note that confirms Diana’s fears for a car “accident”, he released the Mischon Note to coroner Michael Burgess.
According to the Operation Paget Report, in November 1995 Diana had said:
Prince Philip wants to see me dead”.

In August 1996, Diana said to her friend Roberto Devorik:
Quote:
I am a threat in their eyes. They only use me when they need me for official functions and then they drop me again in the darkness… they are not going to kill me by poisoning me or in a big plane where others will get hurt. They will either do it when I am on a small plane, in a car when I am driving or in a helicopter.
According to Mohamed Al-Fayed (not the most reliable source for information):
Quote:
Diana told me personally, during a holiday in the South of France, that the person who is spearheading these threats is Prince Philip … She told me it would happen either in a helicopter or a car
http://www.whale.to/c/princess_diana9.html

It has been said that both Dodi and Diana would have survived the crash if they had worn their seatbelts (Trevor Rees-Jones reportedly survived the crash because he put it on shortly before the crash). If Diana would be afraid to be murdered in a car crash, surely she would have worn it. Diana was known to wear a seatbelt, but couldn’t use it because according to the Paget report it was “jammed”.


Diana was walking in the tunnel after the crash
On the following blog, “George Glass” wrote that according to the live broadcast Diana was OK:
Quote:
I remember clearly the first news report that broke the story that Princess Diana had been in a car wreck. Astoundingly, the onsite journalist reported that the crash was severe and there were seriously injured passengers BUT Diana was up walking around assisting others and was "OK". He commented on how "in character" helping others was for her, alluding to her previous charitable actions. The reporter said he had personally witnessed this.
The MAIN story was that Diana was OK! I remember, as the TV broadcast switched back to the regular scheduled programming, a feeling of "nothing to worry about." Within two hours, to my shock, came the followup news report that Diana had died from injuries sustained in the car crash. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm- Nothing to see here now. Go back to sleep. These are not the Droids you are looking for. Inhale your chemtrails, drink your fluoride, absorb your television "programming", more aspartame and SSRI's please...
December 14, 2012 12:23 PM
http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.nl/2007...-pictures.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/75mkb)

As a reaction to my information that Diana was murdered, a forum member confirmed that the British TV showed that Diana was alive and well:
Quote:
Originally Posted by silent revolution
I remember at 4 or 5 am that morning (uk time) seeing her get out of that car on the news. I then switched the tv off and went to sleep, then woke the next morning to find that she had died. She had seemed to be shaken but didn't look like she any major harm had been done in the accident.
(…)
She was helped out of the car and didn't see very injured. She was conscious and wasn't put in a stretcher in the footage I saw. The footage has probably been destroyed, but would have been on either bbc1, bbc2, itv, channel 4 or channel 5 because I saw it on my mothers black and white portable tv.
That was almost 20 years ago, makes me feel old lol

Diana finished off in ambulance
Jean-Marc Martino, Arnaud Derossi, Barbara Kapfer and a person called “Fadi” were the persons in the ambulance. None of these were doctors. Michel Massebeuf was the driver of the ambulance.
According to John Morgan, Dr. Bruno Riou (head of the intensive care unit at Pitie Salpetriere) noted that the death of Diana was suspicious, which forced an autopsy. Morgan also noted that the ambulance personnel poisoned Diana with catecholamine to increase her blood pressure (BP), which wasn’t needed as her BP of 70 was high enough: http://www.theeventchronicle.com/stu...killing-diana/
(archived here: http://archive.is/N6xQh)


Prince Charles congratulates doctors
A possible motive for the murder of Diana is her Diary with secrets of the British Royal family, including the adultery of Charles.
Diana also possessed a video of George Anthony Smith, who claimed he was raped by Michael Fawcett, a close friend/servant of Charles, who pressed charges with the police (that refused to investigate). He also saw Prince Charles and Fawcett in bed together. Smith died suddenly in 2005 of an unknown disease: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wa...s-aged-2385072

When Prince Charles arrived at the Pitie Salpetriere hospital he asked to be alone with the body of Diana for a few minutes. When Charles came out, he looked at Dr. Bruno Riou and Dr. Philippe Pavie and exclaimed “FELICITATIONS.”
Translated into English: Charles said “congratulations” to the doctors (that killed Lady Diana?).


No CCTV videos
There are a reported 17 CCTV cameras that should have videotaped the Mercedes car on his ride before crashing. Some of them close to the Alma tunnel.
According to the official story none of them were able to record the Mercedes.


Diana illegally embalmed
Diana's body was embalmed illegally with much haste after her death. The order to embalm Diana was given by a senior British diplomat.
Jean Monceau from the French company BJL, who embalmed Diana, wasn’t called to the inquest.
Formaldehyde was introduced to Diana’s body, during the embalming procedure. This could have covered up a pregnancy, but more importantly covered up that Diana was murdered in the ambulance.
Monceau said he regretted going ahead, but didn’t realise he was doing anything wrong: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...aris-heat.html


Flirting with the bodyguard
In tapes first aired on US television in 2004, captured by her speech coach Peter Settelen in 1992, Princess Diana talks about her failing marriage and how she “was only happy” with a particular man. Diana admits she was "playing with fire" and "got burned".
Following her death in 1997, the tapes were in the home of her butler Paul Burrell. Diana’s family insisted the tapes should be returned to them, but in 2004 they were returned to Settelen, who reportedly sold them for £500,000.
In 2007, the BBC bought the rights to keep the tapes on the shelves. Recently (parts of) this tape was broadcast in Britain.

Quote:
When I was 24, 25, I fell deeply in love with somebody who worked in this environment.
I just, you know, wore my heart on my sleeve. I was only happy when he was around. I was like a little girl in front of him the whole time, desperate for praise, desperate.
I was quite happy to give it all up [her royal life], just to go off and live with him. Can you believe it? And he kept saying he thought it was a good idea, too.

It was all found out and he was chucked out. Then he was killed. I think he was bumped off. But, um, there we are . . . we’ll never know.
Starting at 44:55.


It is believed Diana was talking about her bodyguard in 1985, 1986 - Barry Mannakee.
Mannakee was married with two children. Mannakee reportedly flirted openly with Diana in front of servants. But there is no evidence that they engaged in a sexual relationship.
The night before Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson’s wedding in July 1986, Diana was caught in her drawing room in Kensington Palace with Mannakee. A member of Charles’s staff popped his head around the door, and “found the Princess and her detective in a compromising situation”.
Mannakee was accused of being “over-familiar” with the Princess, and transferred.

On the night of 15 May 1987, Mannakee was invited for a ride home on the motorbike of fellow cop Steven Peat. Later that night, the fatal crash with the Ford Siesta driven by Nicola Chopp occurred in Woodford, north-east London.
Mannakee died almost instantly after breaking his spine in two places. Peat and Chopp both survived. An inquest into the death concluded it was an accident.

When they were on their way to the Cannes Film Festival, Prince Charles told Diana of the fatal crash. Diana, then 25, froze in horror, wept uncontrollably, tore her clothes and scratched her arms and legs.
When they arrived in Cannes, Diana’s gown had to be adjusted to cover the wounds on her body: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/who-was-bar...-death-1633106

See bodyguard Barry Mannakee and Princess Diana


Mannakee's brother-in-law Richard Emmins reportedly said:
Quote:
First, he had this accident, then Diana dies in a Paris car crash...however getting to the truth will probably be impossible. We are up against the Establishment. They only let you know as much as they want you to know.
In 2004, Lord Brocket, 53, claimed that there was a secret file of a forensic examination of the Suzuki motorcycle on which Mannakee died. This showed the bike had been tampered with.
Lord Brocket said this was told to him, by a cop he met in Springhill Open Prison where both served time for fraud: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...akee-file.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/R05fV)


Two year affair – Hasnat Khan
Much has been made of the affair between Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed. To me this looks more like a 6 weeks fling fling than a serious relationship.
Hasnat Khan and Diana had a (sexual) relationship from 1995 to 1997 and even had wedding plans. This looks serious: http://www.express.co.uk/dianainques...tement-in-full

Maybe it’s not really important if Diana was pregnant at the time (and if she was, Khan was the probable father), but the following photograph with Prince William on holiday in France 14 days earlier, shows an unmistakable bump around her waistline.



Dodi – Cocaine habit
If I can find this information, with nothing more than internet, why didn’t Mohamed Al-Fayed expose this? I believe Dodi’s father was involved in the cover-up.
Maybe Mohamed Al-Fayed was more afraid of having the truth come out on his drug addicted son, than exposing who did it…
It’s strange that Dodi would let Henri Paul, deputy Security chief at the Ritz, drive them. According to a “Vanity Fair” article of November 1997, Nona Summers and Jack Martin said that Dodi used cocaine. Maybe Henri Paul was Dodi’s cocaine supplier. There are even claims that cocaine was found in the Mercedes after the crash (bizarrely some even claim in Diana’s handbag).
Reportedly Dodi regularly spent more than his monthly allowance from daddy Mohamed of $100,000: http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/...ticle-1.776526


Henri Paul not drunk – dead brothers
First the official story was that Diana and Dodi were running from the paparazzi, but the paparazzi weren’t close to the car when it crashed. There have been some witnesses that saw a number of motorcycles close to the Mercedes and a slow car, but no paparazzi (photographers would have surely stuck around if they witnessed the crash).
Then they invented the story that the driver Henri Paul was drunk and presented autopsy results that confirmed that he had 3 times the legal limit (comparable to 2 bottles of wine). They also found several psychiatric drugs in his blood (including Prozac), which would make the effects of the alcohol even stronger. Why would Dodi and Diana step in the car with a drunken chauffeur?

There have been several testimonies that confirm that Paul didn’t look drunk. There have also been testimonies that Paul wasn’t a heavy drinker (or an alcoholic). There is no evidence that Henri Paul had bought psychiatric drugs. There was even alcohol planted in Henri Paul’s apartment after the police had already investigated there: http://www.express.co.uk/dianainques...Paul-was-drunk
(archived here: http://archive.is/33b42)

High levels of carbon monoxide (20.7%) were found in Henri Paul’s blood (enough to make it impossible to walk). It looks like they took blood from another body (possible of a death by suicide with carbon monoxide poisoning, who drank alcohol and committed suicide for being depressed as a result of using Prozac). The blood was kept for 24 hours in an unguarded refrigerator to make this possible: http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2012...ix-henri-paul/
(archived here: http://archive.is/wOvwt)

Bar owner Josiane Le Tellier (Josy) of the Le Champmesle, knew Henri Paul well, and saw him at 9:45 P.M., and he didn’t look drunk: www.britannia.com/news/articles/driver9-23.html

Interestingly Paul was called on his mobile phone (that he had with him)at 9:45 P.M. to come to work, so it is ridiculous that it’s claimed that nobody knew where he was between 7 and 10 P.M.; surely the police could have investigated the data from the phone.
Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones (who survived the crash) stated that Paul appeared “perfectly normal”:
Quote:
In the bar, we ordered dinner and were joined by Henri Paul. He had a drink, I do not know what it was, but it was yellow-coloured. While we had dinner, Paul came and went about the hotel, he was perfectly normal. I did not sense him being on edge, he was just as he usually was in my dealings with him. After a while, Paul had another drink.
Rees-Jones didn’t know if the yellow drink contained alcohol or not.

The 85-year-old father of driver Henri Paul, Jean, has claimed that UK police told him Diana had been murdered: “Inside Scotland Yard, some believe there was a secret plot to kill Diana.
He also said that Henri was not an alcoholic or a drug addict.
The self-confessed lover of Diana, James Hewitt, told an inquiry into her death that he was “warned off” and received threatening phone calls to end their affair in 1989, 1990.

It is obviously dangerous to your health to know what has happened.
After Henri Paul was killed, also 2 of his brothers died, Jean-Luc of a “heart attack” and his youngest brother Sylvan very suddenly of an “aneurysm” aged 51: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...river-10942998
(archived here: http://archive.is/gy8dm)


Henry Paul signaled paparazzi
According to Richard Tomlinson, Henri Paul was an informer for the British secret intelligence agency MI6.
There is hard evidence that Henri Paul was in fact a paid informer for the French Intelligence agency Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire (DST) and possibly also Direction Générale de la Sécurité Extérieure (DGSE): http://www.propagandamatrix.com/arti...11206Diana.htm

At the time of his death Henri Paul had assets of some 1.7 million French Francs, some $340,000. Paul also had $2,500 in cash on him when he was found after the crash. Paul earned a little more than £2,000 month at the Ritz
Paul received large tips from guests at the Ritz, but not this kind of money. Somebody must have been paying Paul large sums. Paul also had an expensive hobby in flying airplanes.
Henri Paul took a detour from the Ritz hotel to go through the Alma tunnel. Obviously the tunnel was specifically selected for the “accident” to minimise the amount of witnesses.
If it were intelligence agents that paid Paul money to take the detour through the Alma tunnel, they couldn’t have given a good reason.

Henri Paul signalled to the paparazzi to let them know Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Al-Fayed were just about to leave the Ritz.
Inspection of the CCTV footage shows that these paparazzi are Serge Benhamou, Jacques Langevin and a third person: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ving-Ritz.html

Paul kept Diana and Dodi waiting since 00:11 AM, at 00:15:50 AM Paul signalled his “friends” that were waiting outside (see the following video still) and they only left for the car at 00:19:50 AM.


A possible explanation for what happened is that Henri Paul was bribed by paparazzi that worked for the intelligence agencies to take the back exit, the Mercedes without dark-tinted glass and the detour through the Alma tunnel.
This would even make it easier for a motorcycle to blind Paul with a flash of light as he would be happily waiting for his “friends” to take the photos that would make him rich.
That Serge Benhamou is a paid intelligence agent becomes ever more likely, when we learn that he has said that Henri Paul was noticeably drunk, while Paul didn’t act drunk at all: http://metro.co.uk/2008/03/10/i-took...d-diana-31298/


Frederic Mailliez – blue eyed actor
In the documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" Doctor Frederic Mailliez testified that Diana was only slightly injured directly after the crash. Mailliez potentially was a dangerous medical expert for the official story.

Here’s another documentary “Who killed Diana? ” (2014): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dANWdysaoF0

Arguably the most interesting from this documentary is the “Frederic Mailliez” that appears in this one from 6:42 – 6:52 and 9:16 – 9:27.
I made 2 screenshots, that you can see below, on the left is Doctor Frédéric Mailliez from "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" (2007), on the right is the “Doctor Mailliez” from the video “Who killed Diana? ” (2014).
First look at the colour of their eyes: Mailliez had brown eyes; the replacement actor has blue eyes!
The upper lip of the blue eyed actor is much wider than of the “real” Mailliez.
Another noticeable difference is that the eyebrows of the blue eyed replacement are lighter and have a different shape.
The blue eyed actor looks younger, while this video is from a later date (7 years?).
Mailliez had more of an upward nose than the blue eyed actor.
They also have a different skin colour, which isn’t only a sun tan.


Here’s another video still of Frederic Mailliez from 1 September 1997.


If you really want to find all the difference, you should watch (and hear) Dr. Mailliez in both documentaries.
The video of the fake blue eyed “Mailliez” is taken in too much of a close-up.
The real Mailliez uses a lot of hand gestures and a lot of facial expression, including frowning with his eyebrows. The fake blue eyed actor doesn’t imitate this very well.
Also noticeable is that the real (French) Mailliez has difficulties with English, but the fake blue eyed actor doesn’t imitate this good (I believe he’s an English actor speaking with a French accent).


John Morgan
John Morgan, wrote several books about the murder of Princess Diana, and died on 19 November 2015 (aged 58). In 2003,Morgan was sentenced to the rare disease Multiple System Atrophy (MSA).
The symptoms of MSA are similar to Parkinson’s disease, which is caused by poisoning with psychiatric drugs. The symptoms for MSA are very similar to the adverse effects of Risperdal: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-c...s/con-20027096


James Adanson suicided – Frederic Dard
James Andanson (real name Jean Paul Gonin) was one of the many paparazzi that followed Diana. In 1996, he achieved a notorious reputation after he made the pictures of Prince Charles kissing nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke. I haven’t been able to find these photos on the internet...
In 2000, Andanson told his friends Frederic and wife Elizabeth Dard that he was planning to release unpublished photos of the crash of Diana that would create “un boum” (a loud bang).

Andanson was found in a car in May 2000 so badly burned that it took the police almost a month and DNA tests and dental records to identify him. According to French fireman Christophe Pelat there were 2 holes in Andanson’s skull, caused by gunshots. The keys to his car were never found. The police ruled this suicide.
It appears impossible Andanson could have burned himself like this, as human bodies don’t burn very well. There is no reason why he would have killed himself. He seemed excited over the bombshell photographs that he was about to make public.

Five weeks after the death of James Andanson, Frederic Dard (a well-known writer) died in his home in Switzerland of a “heart attack”.
Within a week after Andanson died, the SIPA photo agency in Paris, which he co-founded, was raided by 3 armed men, who took computer hard drives, laptops, cameras and the storage media for photographs. They were not concerned at being caught by the police as they spent hours to finish their job: http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/128...ot-in-the-head
(archived here: http://archive.is/vwNfZ)
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...8&postcount=28

Last edited by st jimmy; 29-04-2018 at 01:50 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2018, 04:23 PM   #3
the mighty zhiba
Inactive
 
the mighty zhiba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 20,827
Likes: 5,967 (2,990 Posts)
Default

Excellent well researched post, as always, jimmy.

Cutting for brevity:

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Soldier N said the name of the shadowy unit within the SAS responsible for “lethal operations” is “The Increment for the purposes of carrying out lethal operations on behalf of MI6”.

In early 2012, a SAS officer handed the ex-wife of Soldier N a brown envelope with £500 to which he added that she should never discuss the payment, or discuss the Diana claim with anyone.
In June 2013 she was threatened that if she would speak out in favour of Nightingale at his trial, she could end up dead like Lee Rigby. Theresa Lumby was present when she was threatened in this way.
i'm drawn to wonder what, if anything Jill Dando knew, or discovered, about Diana's death....

Many people assume that she (Dando) was killed because she had knowledge of Savile - as a journalist she could have been working on an expose about Savile....

An friend of mine who used to be in the SAS told me that her murder had all the hallmarks of an SAS hit, and i'm in no doubt that she was killed by an SAS agent.

I'm very aware that Prince Philip (as commander in chief) could issue an order to kill, and that the SAS would be the ones to do that on behalf of Mi6 or the Crown - and that Savile had ties with the royals, particularly Philip and Charles.

But equally, Dando could have been working on an expose about Diana's death - and if the SAS were involved, then she would have become a target also.

Interesting read.
the mighty zhiba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2018, 08:17 PM   #4
techman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 1,046 (572 Posts)
Default

Interesting info there, but theres just too much in the way of defining what really hapoened, who did it, how she was murdered and in what manner, whether Henri Paul was in a mind controlled trigger state (as Icke suggests), etc.

Interesting you mentioned about the tunnel being chosen so that there would be no eyewitnesses around, thats something id never thought of before. So has the location really nothing to do with it being specifically chosen as a sacrificial site?. I still stick to Ickes view about the Pont de Alma tunnel being ritually and symbolically important, even if on the surface it dosent seem that way. Lots of clues seem to point in that direction for me, most notably the lighted torch above the tunnel which, if im right in saying had been placed there many years before.

The video footage indicating that Paul, quite clearly, wasnt under the influence of alcohol prior to leaving the hotel supports Icke‘s view that Paul was put into some kind of mind controlled trigger type state of mind. And in David‘s talk on the assasination he states that it wouldve been impossible for Henri Paul to have hit the thirteenth pillar unless he was under some kind mind controlled state.

If Diana was taken out for xyz reason, in other words because she crossed the line with them, then the whole ritual aspect wouldnt fit in. From what I understand from Icke - and others too, is that she was groomed to be with Charles right from the start, with them having children, and once they were born she was no longer needed. So wasnt it the plan eventually to murder her?. If she was taken primarily because she was inteferring with the landmines (which some researchers believe to be the case), then what would the point be in the ritual?, or was that just an added bonus?. I suppose to the laymen researchers, reasons like marrying a muslim, being pregnant and the landmine campaign are valid and reasonable suggestions, but also could be on the surface cover reasons for those who do question the official version of events, but at the same time they dont go too much down the rabbit hole so to speak. Most people ive spoken to who question the death of Diana are surprisingly very open to her being murdered, but they always come out with the usual "because she was pregnant,,,was marrying a muslim..." reasons. They never consider the symbolic and ritualistic aspects.

Last edited by techman; 29-04-2018 at 08:41 PM.
Likes: (1)
techman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2018, 06:54 AM   #5
hande
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 657 (413 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
"because she was pregnant,,,was marrying a muslim..." reasons. They never consider the symbolic and ritualistic aspects.
They also never consider how fecking stupid that is

She was carrying a Muslim and they didn't want a Muslim on the throne etc

Charles children are in line to the throne not hers - so any children she has make no difference to the succession.

The fac this future muslim king idea has any support demonstrates that people have no idea how the system works, cant even do basic research and will believe anything if it sounds good to them.
hande is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2018, 08:24 AM   #6
techman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 1,046 (572 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hande View Post
They also never consider how fecking stupid that is

She was carrying a Muslim and they didn't want a Muslim on the throne etc

Charles children are in line to the throne not hers - so any children she has make no difference to the succession.

The fac this future muslim king idea has any support demonstrates that people have no idea how the system works, cant even do basic research and will believe anything if it sounds good to them.
I'm with you on that.

Even conspiracy researchers will only point to those above reasons, and they will either laugh off the ritual aspect as being too far fetched, or either they will not consider the idea even though research does hint at that, or even consider those theories have been put out as disinfo. Simplifying events in a conventional way prevents people from delving too deep into an event. I suppose this mindset is based on what we everyday people would perceive as the norm, the way we perceive people to be murdered.

Regarding Diana allegedly being murdered by lethal injection or poison in the ambulance, if we're considering this being a ritual sacrifice then this suggestion dosent make much sense to me. Poisoning someone ain't exactly a ritual murder. Surely she died in some other, far more shocking and horrifying manner. Icke believes that she had to die in that tunnel. I don't go with everything Icke says, but looking at the apparent symbolism it does make me consider that to be the case.

Last edited by techman; 30-04-2018 at 08:35 AM.
techman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2018, 10:07 AM   #7
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1,186 (693 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
Interesting info there, but theres just too much in the way of defining what really hapoened, who did it, how she was murdered and in what manner, whether Henri Paul was in a mind controlled trigger state (as Icke suggests), etc.
From my point of view "we" are all under some form of mind control.
A way of "mind control" is making us greedy, so we can be bribed. I think that Henri Paul's motive was greed (obviously he didn't know they were planning a crash).
Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
The video footage indicating that Paul, quite clearly, wasnt under the influence of alcohol prior to leaving the hotel supports Icke‘s view that Paul was put into some kind of mind controlled trigger type state of mind.
I really don't see what part of the video shows that Paul was in "some kind of mind controlled trigger type state of mind".


Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
So has the location really nothing to do with it being specifically chosen as a sacrificial site?. I still stick to Ickes view about the Pont de Alma tunnel being ritually and symbolically important, even if on the surface it dosent seem that way. Lots of clues seem to point in that direction for me, most notably the lighted torch above the tunnel which, if im right in saying had been placed there many years before.
Symbols are all important to the elite (the thirteenth pillar...). I haven't looked at this assassination from that point of view (as you've rightfully concluded from my post).
Probably the Pont de Alma tunnel was chosen intentionally not only for less witnesses, but also for it's ritual importance.


Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
If Diana was taken out for xyz reason, in other words because she crossed the line with them, then the whole ritual aspect wouldnt fit in.
Even if she was killed because "she crossed the line" the ritual would still be important...


Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
So wasnt it the plan eventually to murder her?
I believe that the Royals only planned to kill her after she wanted out of the family.
A possible motive for killing her was that she was becoming more popular than the Royal family. Dead they (through her children William and Harry) could win the sympathy vote.
She was worth more dead than alive!


Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
If she was taken primarily because she was inteferring with the landmines (which some researchers believe to be the case), then what would the point be in the ritual?, or was that just an added bonus?
I don't believe that the landmine campaign was any real "campaign" at all.
These Royals and other billionaires buy a good name for themselves with "philanthropy" while everything gets only worse.


Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
They never consider the symbolic and ritualistic aspects.
Symbolism and rituals are a "big" topic. I try to keep some kind of focus by narrowing the scope.
For me symbolism and rituals are interesting on its own.
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...8&postcount=28

Last edited by st jimmy; 30-04-2018 at 10:09 AM.
Likes: (2)
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2018, 07:40 AM   #8
eddieb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 341 (189 Posts)
Default Eye Witnesses.

Years ago a relative who was a cop told me of the fallibility of evidence given by eye witnesses. He said if ten people watched an incident and afterwards were not allowed to converse with each other and then interviewd seperately they would likely give ten totally different versions. With that in mind I was amazed to read two things that were supposedly seen by people who witnessed the Diana incident.
The first was the British Lawyer who stated that the merc was White and yet everybody else stated that it was Blue or dark in colour.
The second was that Diana was seen to be standing outside of the vehicle yet no one else saw this. Although the Doctor who was first on the scene stated that diana was lying down on the back seat with most of her body outside the car?
__________________
The Nameless War. The book they said would never be written.
Author: CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY.
It's a small book, but it says so much!
Likes: (1)
eddieb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2018, 08:47 AM   #9
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1,186 (693 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieb View Post
Although the Doctor who was first on the scene stated that diana was lying down on the back seat with most of her body outside the car?
Don't be ridiculous.

The first doctor on the scene was Dr. Frederic Mailliez who gave Diana first aid and said that the only thing he did, was administer oxygen.
He said no such thing as that most of Diana's body was outside the car (I don't know everything the actor that replaced Mailliez said though).
Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
I have found 2 photographs of Diana alive after the crash and not looking injured, which you can see directly below (the man in white is Doctor Frederic Mailliez).


(...)

The first medical doctor on the scene of the crash was Doctor Frederic Mailliez (who arrived on the scene with his friend Mark Butt), who provided Diana with first aid in the Alma tunnel.
Paparazzo Romuald Rat and his driver Stephane Darmon arrived at the scene before Mailliez; Rat opened the door where he saw Diana laying on the floor of the car, took her pulse and spoke some soothing words to her.

Mailliez provided Diana with oxygen as he concluded that she had problems breathing, because of the position of her body and that she was unconscious. He further stated that she didn’t look badly injured and expected that she would survive.
You can hear Frederic Mailliez say this in the documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" (2007): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1YtUqz0xNY

You can go to the time stamps if you only want to watch what Mailliez said.
11:04 – 11:20:
Quote:
she [Diana] didn’t have any blood on her face, but she was unconscious and her head was down like that and she had difficulty to breathe, so she needed some assistance very quickly.
15:56 – 16:06:
Quote:
I thought this beautiful woman had a good chance to live because I thought it was just a head injury.
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...8&postcount=28
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2018, 06:26 AM   #10
eddieb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 341 (189 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Don't be ridiculous.

The first doctor on the scene was Dr. Frederic Mailliez who gave Diana first aid and said that the only thing he did, was administer oxygen.
He said no such thing as that most of Diana's body was outside the car (I don't know everything the actor that replaced Mailliez said though).
Dr. Mailliez moved Diana's head to allow her to breathe. He called the emergency hotline to report the details of the crash on his car phone. He was told that ambulances had already been dispatched to the scene. He then administered oxygen, and ensured that Diana was not going to choke to death~h or swallow her tongue. When SAMU arrived on the scene, Dr. Mailliez left, confident that she would be quickly brought to a nearby hospital. He had ah~already concluded, on the basis of Princess Diana's vital signs, and her movements, that she was bleeding internally.

OK, I misquoted, but this is from your own posting. " French Coverup of Diana Assassination Exposed!

by Jeffrey Steinberg and Allen Douglas "

The first doctors to arrive with the ambulance and the other emergency vehicles reached the same conclusion, according to statements given to The Scotsman. One doctor who asked to remain anonymous said: "She was sweating and her blood pressure had dropped. She had the external signs of internal hemorrhage."

Diana was lying across the back seat of the Mercedes, with most of her body leaning outside the car, when the ambulance arrived, approximately 15-16 minutes after the crash, according to one of the ambulance crew, who also spoke to The Scotsman.
__________________
The Nameless War. The book they said would never be written.
Author: CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY.
It's a small book, but it says so much!
eddieb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2018, 09:03 AM   #11
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1,186 (693 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
The most informative site I found on the murder of Diana is this one: http://www.public-interest.co.uk/diana/diexposed.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddieb View Post
The first doctors to arrive with the ambulance and the other emergency vehicles reached the same conclusion, according to statements given to The Scotsman. One doctor who asked to remain anonymous said: "She was sweating and her blood pressure had dropped. She had the external signs of internal hemorrhage."

Diana was lying across the back seat of the Mercedes, with most of her body leaning outside the car, when the ambulance arrived, approximately 15-16 minutes after the crash, according to one of the ambulance crew, who also spoke to The Scotsman.
Finishing the last (coloured) quote:
Quote:
Diana was lying across the back seat of the Mercedes, with most of her body leaning outside the car, when the ambulance arrived, approximately 15-16 minutes after the crash, according to one of the ambulance crew, who also spoke to The Scotsman. She was almost immediately removed from the car.

Yet, Diana remained at the crash site for another hour, before she was placed in an ambulance and driven, at less than 25 mph, to a hospital on the other side of the Seine River, four miles away. The decision to bring Princess Diana to La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital was evidently made by the senior French government officials on the spot, Paris Police Chief Massoni and Interior Minister Chevenement. Massoni was in the tunnel, and Chevenement was already at La Pitie Salpetriere, in phone contact with the rescue crew in the tunnel. Yet, there are five other hospitals closer to the crash site, all with advanced emergency capabilities.
I guess we argee that the “doctor who asked to remain anonymous” contradicts what Frederic Mailliez said:
Quote:
According to a lengthy news account, published in The Scotsman on Sept. 29, Dr. Mailliez did not believe that Princess Diana's condition was desperate. He later told a French medical journal, "I thought her life could be saved." Dr. Mailliez was an experienced emergency medical professional, who worked at one time for the SAMU, the French government's emergency ambulance service, before going to work for a private medical response outfit called SOS Medecins.

Dr. Mailliez found Princess Diana lying on the back seat of the Mercedes, according to his account to The Scotsman. Contrary to stories leaked by French authorities to the press, she was not pinned in the rear compartment. The back seat of the Mercedes had not been seriously damaged in the crash, and there was no obstruction to getting atDiana. The French authorities issued these initial false reports in response to queries why it had taken an incredible one hour and 43 minutes, from the time that the first ambulance arrived at the crash site, to deliver Princess Diana to the hospital-four miles away.

Further, Romuald Rat, one of the most thuggish of the paparazzi, who was later charged with possible complicity in the Mercedes crash, was observed by one eyewitness at the crash site, leaning over Princess Diana as she lay semi-conscious in the back seat of the Mercedes, just before the first emergency rescue crew arrived.

Dr. Mailliez moved Diana's head to allow her to breathe. He called the emergency hotline to report the details of the crash on his car phone. He was told that ambulances had already been dispatched to the scene. He then administered oxygen, and ensured that Diana was not going to choke to death or swallow her tongue. When SAMU arrived on the scene, Dr. Mailliez left, confident that she would be quickly brought to a nearby hospital. He had already concluded, on the basis of Princess Diana's vital signs, and her movements, that she was bleeding internally.
The last (underlined) sentenced also contradicts what Mailliez stated.
Mailliez later explained that he had NOT noticed that Diana “was bleeding internally”…
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...8&postcount=28

Last edited by st jimmy; 03-05-2018 at 09:05 AM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2018, 04:55 PM   #12
st jimmy
Senior Member
 
st jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1,186 (693 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the mighty zhiba View Post
i'm drawn to wonder what, if anything Jill Dando knew, or discovered, about Diana's death....

(...)

But equally, Dando could have been working on an expose about Diana's death - and if the SAS were involved, then she would have become a target also.
There are so many links when I search for a connection between Princess Diana and Jill Dando that it’s suspicious. It looks like they’re hiding something.

Some of the “connections” found:
Jill and Diana looked, were “similar”.
The man found guilty, and acquitted in appeal, of murdering Dando, Barry George, had previously stalked Diana.
Jill’s fiancé, Alan Farthing, later delivered Prince William and Kate’s baby.
Jill Dando had an affair with Andrew Morton, author of “Diana: Her True Story".
Jill Dando was also a friend of “Sir” Cliff Richard (repeatedly pictured with Prince Charles and Diana).

The only stories I found that claim that there is a connection between both murders, claim that both Diana and Dando were investigating paedophilia.
I haven’t found a single story that argues that Jill Dando was murdered because she was investigating the murder of Lady Di.


There is one connection I found that’s actually interesting: the BBC reporter that told the world about the crash and later death of Diana, Martyn Lewis, also was a co-host of the Six O'Clock news bulletin with Jill Dando .
When Lewis went to bed after reporting on the crash in the tunnel, he thought that Diana would live...
Quote:
Lewis played a prominent role in the announcement of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales on Sunday 31 August 1997. He was called into the BBC in the early hours of that morning to present short national bulletins about the car accident in Paris. He returned home afterwards to get some sleep – expecting the Princess to pull through – only to be drafted in again in time for the special 6am bulletin covering Diana's death.
http://41club.org/pages/martyn-lewis-cbe
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/save/http://4...rtyn-lewis-cbe)

I found this by “accident” when searching for a “connection” between Diana and Dando, but when searching for it, I couldn’t find anything...


The following link has some interesting information, including that the first reports said that “Dodi was dead, Diana was fine”:
Quote:
Gowing explains that even in 1997, the spectre of fake news stalked the media. “I overheard in the newsroom, in the background, that a woman had called in and said she’d seen Diana get up and walk away from the scene. As always with these things, you have to think, are we getting the facts here? Getting this right was based on information which was curated and checked as far as possible, but it was damn difficult.”
(…)
When footage of the crash finally emerged after about three hours, Mawhinney realised that reports Diana was suffering merely "a concussion, a broken arm and cuts to one of her thighs" were probably understated.
(...)
I got a call saying Dodi was dead, Diana was fine, but they thought she’d probably broken her leg,” she recalls. Using only the wires that were coming through mainly from French services, the Sky team tried to piece together a picture of what was going on.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a7917366.html
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/201710041...-a7917366.html)
__________________
Do NOT ever read my posts.
Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: https://forum.davidicke.com/showpost...8&postcount=28

Last edited by st jimmy; 03-05-2018 at 04:56 PM.
st jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2018, 09:38 PM   #13
armoured_amazon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 21,291
Likes: 287 (134 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st jimmy View Post
Probably the Pont de Alma tunnel was chosen intentionally not only for less witnesses, but also for it's ritual importance.
Probably already mentioned but Alma means Soul.
armoured_amazon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 07:30 AM   #14
engelsblume
Senior Member
 
engelsblume's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 540
Likes: 9 (8 Posts)
Default

Well, this will sound ridiculous as ever but around 2002 I got a hold of a book written by a ...oh gosh this will so sound ridiculous....written by a local witch.....I was one of the few who was actually allowed to buy it....there were like only 50 or so copies...in it, as shocking as it was, was a section describing how when she was young during the 80's, she went through years and years of some magical training in the middle east, to one day be prepared for a magical ritual that was to kill the princess...she didn't know it at the time....

I'm in the balkans, btw...

I don't remember all the other details and I got rid of the book 3 years ago (threw it in a river), but that's what was in it...it was totally out of place and it was what partially brought me to all these conspiracy topics.

btw the book also mentioned how the main part of the ritual was performed by covens in Britain. But it wasn't stated why the whole thing was done.

I don't know. I can't believe I even wrote all this lol Even I don't know what to think of the whole thing.
__________________
I find television to be very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go in the other room and read a book. ~Groucho Marx
engelsblume is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 08:07 AM   #15
Sabrina
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 480
Likes: 365 (225 Posts)
Default

Narcissists never let you go and remain jealous even when they have a new partner. The most dangerous time for women is after divorcing a narc as they often murder the ex so no one else can have them.

Sometimes the simplest explanation....

Question is ....which narc was jealous? ....she dated a few.
Sabrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 06:32 PM   #16
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 12,615 (7,205 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabrina View Post
The most dangerous time for women is after divorcing a narc as they often murder the ex so no one else can have them..
is it also a dangerous time for men?

do narc women seek to destroy men out of vindictiveness?
__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2018, 06:33 PM   #17
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 12,615 (7,205 Posts)
Default

Rule By Bloodline? Time To Grow Up - The David Icke Videocast

__________________
I want a country i can be proud of
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2018, 06:18 AM   #18
eddieb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 341 (189 Posts)
Default

Harry, the only man who married a woman who's family is more fucked up than his own!
__________________
The Nameless War. The book they said would never be written.
Author: CAPTAIN A.H.M. RAMSAY.
It's a small book, but it says so much!
Likes: (1)
eddieb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2018, 11:11 AM   #19
JumpRogue
Moderator
 
JumpRogue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 156 (111 Posts)
Default

I thought everyone knew about the bullet casing
__________________
separate mind from hearing
some humans are of no help once they know their capabilities
JumpRogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2018, 08:57 PM   #20
Sabrina
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 480
Likes: 365 (225 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
is it also a dangerous time for men?

do narc women seek to destroy men out of vindictiveness?
Yes.
But women tend to die at the hands of men more statistically.
Although anyone that knows a narc knows that they destroy you psychologically and financially as well as physically.

I know of a narc couple and she pulled a knife on him one day and he strangled her the next- she survived that and then blackmailed him so he blackmailed her back - they both have partners but they still try to destroy each other plus some other exes they have....

Last edited by Sabrina; 19-05-2018 at 08:59 PM.
Sabrina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.