moon = giant spacecraft

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by tnt1

That single rotation hardly qualifies as a rotation as it just moves some, and it is actually the tidal lock that does that movement of the moon or asteroids so what is your fucking point?

And once again with the antagonistic shit!! MY POINT was that it DOES rotate, as do all tidally locked Moons. The tidal lock doesn't "do the movement". Earth doesn't drag the thing around on a rope, it moves ON IT'S OWN, slowly with a single rotation per orbit. My other points are that your conclusions are inaccurate. The Moon wasn't "thumped" The information about it ringing like a bell came from NASA, yet believed and badly interpreted! Explained and ignored above.

Don't answer you are not worth a breath any longer to me, you just want to come in here again posting other peoples info again as if you can explain it better than they. I don't care to hear it from you thanks anyway.

Then STFU!!

[tnt1]

Originally Posted by truegroup

They know a lot more than that based on analysis of the lunar samples, numerous probes and numerous ALSEP experiments from Apollo.



It doesn't indicate that at all. The seismometers were placed on the lunar surface by the Apollo astronauts. Various readings taken were from Moonquakes and Apollo hardware impacting the Moon.


Their conclusions were that the Moon rang like a bell because of....

https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/hom...oonquakes.html

"On Earth, vibrations from quakes usually die away in only half a minute. The reason has to do with chemical weathering, Neal explains: "Water weakens stone, expanding the structure of different minerals. When energy propagates across such a compressible structure, it acts like a foam sponge--it deadens the vibrations." Even the biggest earthquakes stop shaking in less than 2 minutes.

The moon, however, is dry, cool and mostly rigid, like a chunk of stone or iron. So moonquakes set it vibrating like a tuning fork. Even if a moonquake isn't intense, "it just keeps going and going," Neal says. And for a lunar habitat, that persistence could be more significant than a moonquake's magnitude."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow...ng_like_a_bell



Hollow asteroids? Where? All tidally locked Moons rotate. They perform a single rotation per orbit.

The moon is not dry. You are incorrect again! It very likely has water in it! https://www.space.com/37596-moon-int...ave-water.html

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by tnt1

The moon is not dry. You are incorrect again! It very likely has water in it! https://www.space.com/37596-moon-int...ave-water.html

It's like arguing with a child. The Moon is bone dry. Water pockets are solid ice and the deep interior

I love the way you source an article derived from NASA research to attempt to fumble around their conclusion that the Moon is bone dry and that's why it rang so long

[juttkeys]

The moon may very well be an ancient construct, I dont know, one thing I think though, the rocks were not man made out of earth rocks/lava/basalt etc etc in some unbelievably amazing NASA laboratory by some geologists 40+ years ago who were way way way more ahead of their profession than geologists even now.... No, I'm thinking they actually went and brought them back.... again just my honest opinion.

Another option is that aliens gave NASA the samples I guess ?

I eagerly await more of your insults....

[truth seeker 09]

Here it is 300x zooming in. Wow!

'World's sharpest super telephoto lens?'

'I wanted make the viewer, to feel like observing the moon from a spacecraft.'

[truth seeker 09]

Originally Posted by truth seeker 09

Here it is 300x zooming in. Wow!

'World's sharpest super telephoto lens?'

'I wanted make the viewer, to feel like observing the moon from a spacecraft.'

What is that thing flying over @ 2:58?

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by truth seeker 09

What is that thing flying over @ 2:58?

A bug.

[oz93666]

This is a very convincing 4 minute video , produced by the History Chanell

http://

[the nine]

Originally Posted by truegroup

A bug.

Where did you get your info from? (Is if your opinion or a fact?)
What type of bug?
How come it looked so small considering how far the camera was zoomed in?
Surely if it was some type of insect it would have been a much larger blur considering the depth of field..
Try looking at a mosquito flying through the air with a pair of binoculars to understand where I'm coming from

[metak88]

Originally Posted by the nine

Where did you get your info from? (Is if your opinion or a fact?)
What type of bug?
How come it looked so small considering how far the camera was zoomed in?
Surely if it was some type of insect it would have been a much larger blur considering the depth of field..
Try looking at a mosquito flying through the air with a pair of binoculars to understand where I'm coming from

Tiny bugs do get inside the lenses. Video description says he used modified Apo Extender when he recorded this video at camping side.

[truegroup]

Originally Posted by the nine

Where did you get your info from? (Is if your opinion or a fact?)
What type of bug?

One that scuttled over the lens

How come it looked so small considering how far the camera was zoomed in?

Because it is small and it is walking across the lens.

Surely if it was some type of insect it would have been a much larger blur considering the depth of field..

You are seeing the silhouette.

Try looking at a mosquito flying through the air with a pair of binoculars to understand where I'm coming from

It isn't in the air, it's on the lens.

[the nine]

Originally Posted by truegroup

One that scuttled over the lens



Because it is small and it is walking across the lens.



You are seeing the silhouette.



It isn't in the air, it's on the lens.

fair comment.

[the nine]

Originally Posted by metak88

Tiny bugs do get inside the lenses. Video description says he used modified Apo Extender when he recorded this video at camping side.

Thanks for the info, Im humbled