Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > The Global Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2016, 07:42 PM   #1
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default The race war

The idealism of the 1960's ended in the cynicism of vietnam and the manson family murders

Manson and his cult appear to be another MKUltra mind control programme as was jonestown which was famously shut down through a mass suicide event

The manson cult spoke about a race war they called 'helter skelter' and it might just be possible that they had some awareness of a wider agenda

Today as we watch europe being flooded with outsiders by george soros and fake-left minions like angela merkl the words of the coudenhove-kalergi plan suddenly come into sharper focus which involved a plan to create a mix race slave class who would be ruled over by a jewish el-ite (ie the central banking families) and the european aristocracy (ie the black nobility families who are close to the vatican)

Modern day spokespeople for this background plan such as UN migration chief Peter Sutherland have called for the undermining of the homogenity of nation states

There are a number of reasons why the capitalist el-ite would want this scenario. They have already dispossessed the public of most of their wealth through their neoliberal policies and through orchestrated boom and bust cycles and fake 'austerity' but now they wish to break the spirit of the people and this is done through destroying any sense of cohesive identity people have which enables them to stand united with the people around them

To achieve that the central banking cabal have to breakdown national sovereignty and religious identity and any sense of individual freedom in order to create a subserviant slave class
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 07:56 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 07:50 PM   #2
the apprentice
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,637
Likes: 2,987 (2,092 Posts)
Default

Its time to begin making your own reality, because at this stage in the game which ever side you chose the result will be the same, all groups are already infiltrated with masonic stooges and are always taken over.

The time is for millions of individuals to re train the ones who want to help themselves before this generation with the skills is gone.
the apprentice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 07:55 PM   #3
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

The NWO is a neo-fuedal movement that wishes to enslave the entire human race under a small ruling class. To achieve that they must destroy the middle class and that is what they are busy doing through various trade agreements such as NAFTA, CETA, TTIP and the TPP etc

The savings of the middle class are being destroyed by low interest rates set by the central banks, jobs are being lost oversees and wages being driven down by mass immigration whislt further jobs are under threat from automation

In countries like the US the middle class is largely white and as a result the cabal use their corporate media to demonise white people in order to turn dissaffected sections of the public against the middle class

As a result of the oligarchs various economic policies there are now many poor and disgruntled people not just in the west but also abroad where the oligarchs have bombed their countries or indebted them to the IMF. This has created many angry people who are looking for someone to blame and the NWO el-ite then point them in the direction of white people who are now being scapegoated for the various crimes of the freemasonic el-ite.

The middle class has responded by voting for donald trump who they have hoped would push back against the various NWO policies which are destroying the US as a nation so that it can be absorbed into a world government (controlled by the cabal)

For the NWO cabal to rule over the mass of humanity it has to get them all to fight amongst themselves. This is acheived by taking the frustrations that different sections of society feel and then directing that anger at the target population which at the moment is the middle class who the el-ite feel theatened by because they perceive them to be politicially sophisticated and capable of running the system themselves without the oligarchs; the middle class is used toa degree of political involvement and this makes them a threat to the oligarchs plan for central control and domination of the system

For example the NWO hijaked female emancipation from household chores (which was actually driven by technological advancements in labour saving devices) and turned it into militant marxist third wave feminism which conditioned women to see not the oligarchs who ran the system as the enemy but men in general; this way men and women fought each other instead of the oligarchs; they called this the 'battle of the sexes' in their media

The oligarchs also stirred up religious tensions between christians and muslims by provoking conflict in muslims lands and by propping up corrupt monarchies in muslim countries thereby preventing the spread of democracy. They then flooded christian lands with muslims to further push people towards a divisive conflict which they called the 'clash of civilisations' in the media

The other tensions they have sought to fan the flames of is between white and black people through for example funding 'black lives matter' and by paying agent provocateurs to create riots and fires and trouble at otherwise peaceful protests in order to fuel tensions. The oligarchs also militarised the police and created a more aggressive and militarised culture within the police whilst changing laws (the NDAA) which made US soil part of the global battlefield (because the oligarchs see the people as the enemy); they also sent police off to israel to be trained in how to control populations that perceive them as occupiers. Meanwhile the oligarchs have pushed narratives in the media and universities that speak of 'white privilege' and the need to 'end whiteness' and of 'european colonialism' and the 'anglo-american empire' to try and paint a target on the backs of middle class white people

All these terms conceal the truth that it is in fact the oligarchs themselves that are behind all the various crimes of history. But in order to turn black people against white people they have to frame the language in such a way as to make black people perceive white people in general as the enemy rather than the ruling el-ites who white people have struggled against for millenia in order to win any of the working conditions and rights they enjoy today
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 08:19 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:10 PM   #4
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

The oligarchs look for disgruntled sections of society for example minorities and they then use them to attack society itself rather then the oligarchs

These disgruntled vandals have been called 'social justice warriors' in recent times and to the middle class they appear to be full of hate for the people around them

By playing the game of the oligarchs and attacking society itself rather then the el-ites who are actually responsible for colonialism, third world debt, unemployment, austerity, wars abroad etc they end up supporting the 'revolution from above' of the top 0.01% of society who wish to centralise their wealth and their control over society

The hatred of social justice warriors blinds them to the wider threat to society itself. if this threat is brought to their attention and explained to them they respond bitterly with comments about white people deserving it because of vague things like 'colonialism'

This strikes me as a kind of solomonic scene where two mothers are arguing over a baby with society being the baby. The people who have been frozen out of society by the oligarchs are so fed up they don't care if the baby is cut in half if it prevents anyone else from having it

The problem with this approach is that it only empowers the oligarchs and helps destroy the middle which has been the only section of the workers that has managed to rise to a point where it can actually challenge the supremacy of the oligarchs

Social justice warriors are so full of hate that they do not care if they tear society apart; they just want to rage and have allowed the oligarchs to choose how they do it

Their anger blinds them and makes them the perfect tool of the oligarchs who then turn that anger against society itself rather then on the oligarchs who are actually responsible for the plight of all workers around the world eg the richest 60 people now have more wealth then the bottom 50% of humanity and yet the social justice warriors wage war on society and not on those 60 people who have stolen all the wealth
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 08:21 PM.
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:25 PM   #5
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

It is interesting to see which celebrities are endorsing hilary clinton

Jewish singer bruce springstein who has cultivated a blue collar image has thrown his lot in with hilary to try and convince the public that they should support the very same network that has destroyed the wealth of working people

Freemason and illuminati puppet Jay Z and fellow illuminati puppet beyonze have also supported clinton in an attempt to court the votes of black people and yet clinton represents the very same banking network who took the homes of sub prime mortage holders, many of which were black in their orchestrated housing crisis of 2008 (money isn't destroyed in a crisis it just changes hands)
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 09:36 PM   #6
knightofalbion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 646 (414 Posts)
Default

"Court the votes of black people". I doubt many African Americans will be voting for Donald J. Trump with or without Jay Z's intervention!

"Jewish singer Bruce Springsteen" Huh? He was raised a Roman Catholic, but turned agnostic in adult life.
__________________
All this talk of religion, but it's how you live your life that is the all-important thing.
If you set out each day to do all the goodness and kindness that you can, and to do no harm to man or beast, then you are walking the highest path.
And when your time is up, if you can leave the earth a better place than you found it, then yours will have been a life well lived.
http://holy-lance.blogspot.com
knightofalbion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 10:34 PM   #7
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,416 (2,494 Posts)
Default

Donald Trump is there for the very reason of exacerbating racial tensions. His divisive rhetoric energizes white nationalists and other such racists.

He is there for that specific reason.

This will only move minorities to back whoever the other option is. Which is what we see happening.

Trump is a divider. Again that's why the elites put him out there. Whether he wins or not is kind of irrelevant because the goal of division has already been achieved. Minorities will only become more defensive and radicalized with Trump spewing his hatred.

The racists are comming out of the woodwork after Trump gave them a voice.

Last edited by vancity eagle; 08-11-2016 at 10:36 PM.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:23 PM   #8
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knightofalbion View Post
"Court the votes of black people". I doubt many African Americans will be voting for Donald J. Trump with or without Jay Z's intervention!
no jay z is endorsing clinton

he and other illuminati puppets....i mean if you asked joe bloggs off the street to name illuminati puppets from the music industry they would say:

-jay z
-beyonze
-lady ga ga
-katy perry

all of which are endorsing that illuminati-carlin clinton

Quote:
Originally Posted by knightofalbion View Post
"Jewish singer Bruce Springsteen" Huh? He was raised a Roman Catholic, but turned agnostic in adult life.
he's ashkenazi
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:26 PM   #9
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
Donald Trump is there for the very reason of exacerbating racial tensions. His divisive rhetoric energizes white nationalists and other such racists.

He is there for that specific reason.

This will only move minorities to back whoever the other option is. Which is what we see happening.

Trump is a divider. Again that's why the elites put him out there. Whether he wins or not is kind of irrelevant because the goal of division has already been achieved. Minorities will only become more defensive and radicalized with Trump spewing his hatred.

The racists are comming out of the woodwork after Trump gave them a voice.
no trump is talking about protecting national boundaries, preventing globalist international trade agreements that give the oligarchs corporations power over nation states and democratically elected parliaments, pulling back from war with russia and so on. Those are policies that middle america supports and they are not 'racist' policies

you are just upset becasue you want to see the US destroyed because you are a 'communist' but the rothschilds who are behind all this NWO crap are not wanting to create a utopia for the workers...they don't give two hoots about you or your human rights

they see you as their slave and they intend to enshrine that in law
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 11:32 PM.
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:30 PM   #10
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

The following article in RT today sounds like it is suprised that the jewish neo-cons and the jewish 'liberals' have united behind clinton; obviously the author of the piece has not yet realised that the jewish left and the jewish right are just two arms of the same NWO cabal

The Neocon-Liberal alliance: Clinton coalition that could trigger WWIII
The 2016 US Presidential election has seen a coming together of hard-core Bush-era neocons and the anti-Bush liberal-left in support of the candidacy of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
US Elections 2016
Neil Clark

The unofficial coalition, which looks likely to help propel the Democratic nominee to the White House (if the polls are to believed), will have surprised many, but it’s not the first time self-identified progressives have - wittingly or unwittingly - aided the cause of the most reactionary people in western politics.

The neocons: a group of ultra-hawkish hard-right imperialists, who are quite happy for the US to illegally invade other sovereign states and drop bombs all over the world. The liberal-left: who profess their support for human rights, internationalism and progressive causes.

At first sight, these two groups don’t appear to have much in common. But the truth is the liberal-left have for a long time been the accomplices of the endless war lobby.

Think back to 1999 and the US-led bombing of Yugoslavia. Never mind that the Balkan state was a multi-party democracy that operated an economy with very high levels of public/social ownership: the liberal-left cheered as bombs rained down on Belgrade, Nis and Kragujevac . Many ‘progressives’ swallowed hook, line and sinker the lurid claims of a ‘genocide’ being committed in the province of Kosovo, which were later dismissed by a UN court.
Although it was promoted as a ‘humanitarian’ venture, the bombing of Yugoslavia was in fact a hard-right project pushed by fiercely anti-socialist/anti-communist Cold War warriors.

It’s worth noting the names on the Executive Committee of the ‘Balkan Action Committee’ which lobbied hard for war against Yugoslavia in 1999. They included Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld - three men we would all hear a lot more from in the build-up to war with Iraq.

The liberal-left were also broadly on board for the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, an assault we were told would greatly help women's rights.

However, in 2003, there was a break between most of the liberal-left and the neocons over the invasion of Iraq. This military aggression, unlike the one against Yugoslavia, was led by a Republican president. George W. Bush, the man at the helm, was too much of a Texan ‘redneck’ for educated liberal-leftists to support.

Progressives who had no problem with backing an illegal war against Yugoslavia, found they did have a problem backing an illegal war against Iraq.

In the end, the only ‘liberals’ who supported the Iraq invasion were neo-cons masquerading as liberals, and we all saw through their disguise.

read on here https://www.rt.com/op-edge/365792-hi...on-neocons-us/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 11:31 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:36 PM   #11
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

The media has been trying to tell us all this time that the US is split down the middle between donald and hilary while the fake-left who are acting as the attack dogs of the NWO oligarchs by waging race war against middle america are calling anyone who does not support the CFR/NWO oligarchs candidate clinton a 'racist'

well if there are over 300 million americans and half are 'racists' then according to the fake-left footsoldiers of the capitalist oligarchs (who are crushing the working people through neoliberalism and austerity) there are about 160 million racists in the US

that kind of rhetoric reminds me of the tactics of the frankfurt school which was to call anyone who disagreed with their view of society 'crazy'
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:38 PM   #12
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Bush apparently didn't vote for trump!

all these fake lefties seem to have no problem in their mind that they are standing on the same side of the fence as war criminals like tony blair and george bush

how can they claim they are 'leftwing' when they support the capitalist oligarchs? I'll tell you why...because they are fakes in the same way that ISIS are fakes who are really steered by the CIA and mossad. The 'progressives' are also fakes controlled by the CIA and mossad

Hilary clinton is the oligarchs choice for president...its as simple as that
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 08-11-2016 at 11:39 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:42 PM   #13
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

In 2011, though it was ‘business as usual’ for the neocon/liberal-left alliance as a ‘nice’ Democrat administration helped destroy Libya - the country which had the highest living standards in Africa - and whose ‘tyrannical’ government provided free health care, education, and electricity to all of its citizens.

Again, this was a military assault which was pushed by neocons, the same crowd who’d lobbied for war against Yugoslavia and Iraq. Once again the liberal-left didn’t seem to notice, or indeed to care, who was behind it.

The toppling of Muammar Gaddafi (the latest neocon-designated ‘New Hitler’ who was hell-bent on ‘genocide’), would lead to a more democratic Libya with major advances in human rights, liberal-leftists assured us. In fact, the NATO attack on Libya turned the country into a failed state and a haven for jihadists.

Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State in 2011, played a prominent role in the destruction of Libya - so much so that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, in a recent interview with John Pilger, has labelled it 'Hillary’s war.'

But Libya has been quietly forgotten during the Presidential election campaign, as indeed has the Iraq war.

Liberal-leftists who couldn’t bear the sight of George W. Bush are lining up with pro-Iraq war hawks to try and get HRC elected.

Film-maker Michael Moore, who made the fiercely anti-Bush documentary, Fahrenheit 9-11, finds himself on the same side as Bush's speechwriter David Frum and Robert Kagan, co-founder of the Project for the New American Century. That would have seemed unthinkable a few years back, but it’s happening today, folks.

Why are America’s liberal-left doing this? It’s not as if Trump or Clinton are the only options: Dr Jill Stein's policies on social justice, war and peace, and climate change are far more progressive than Clinton’s. Why, instead of backing Stein, are they enabling Washington’s war lobby again, just as they did in 1999 and in 2011 during the bombing of Libya? Don't they ever learn their lesson? How naive are liberals to be fooled by the sudden neo-con concern for 'women's rights' and the rights of immigrants and gay people?

Make no mistake, the PNAC crowd are backing Clinton, not because they are appalled at sexist/racist or politically incorrect statements made by Donald Trump, but because they believe HRC will be the candidate who is more likely to continue the policy of endless war. More specifically, in regards to Syria, they want a US President who will prioritize on toppling the secular government of President Assad - not defeating ISIS. Trump’s great 'crime' in their eyes is that he does want to prioritize on ISIS - and horror of horrors - to work with Russia to defeat terrorism.

As America goes to the polls today, the stakes could not be higher. Clinton’s support for the imposition of a No-Fly Zone against Russian and Syrian aircraft risks starting World War Three, and the deaths of potentially hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people.

Is that what the ‘progressives’ who are lining up with the destroyers of Iraq really want?

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/365792-hi...on-neocons-us/
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 12:09 AM   #14
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Jewish-American Journalist Carl Bernstein reveals the role 'Jewish Neocons' in Launching Iraq War

__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 01:29 AM   #15
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,416 (2,494 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
Bush apparently didn't vote for trump!

all these fake lefties seem to have no problem in their mind that they are standing on the same side of the fence as war criminals like tony blair and george bush

how can they claim they are 'leftwing' when they support the capitalist oligarchs? I'll tell you why...because they are fakes in the same way that ISIS are fakes who are really steered by the CIA and mossad. The 'progressives' are also fakes controlled by the CIA and mossad

Hilary clinton is the oligarchs choice for president...its as simple as that
Bush always claimed he wouldn't vote for Trump. His Vice President Cheney is supporting Trump though, so we have war criminals on either side.

Fake lefties are just uneducated and they find Trump automatically more repulsive than Clinton, and they are right.

If Trump was a Uniter instead of a divider, and if he didn't act like a psychopath saying how he loved torture, bombing the crap out of people, banning people, he would have MUCH MORE SUPPORT.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 01:36 AM   #16
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,416 (2,494 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
In 2011, though it was ‘business as usual’ for the neocon/liberal-left alliance as a ‘nice’ Democrat administration helped destroy Libya - the country which had the highest living standards in Africa - and whose ‘tyrannical’ government provided free health care, education, and electricity to all of its citizens.

Again, this was a military assault which was pushed by neocons, the same crowd who’d lobbied for war against Yugoslavia and Iraq. Once again the liberal-left didn’t seem to notice, or indeed to care, who was behind it.

The toppling of Muammar Gaddafi (the latest neocon-designated ‘New Hitler’ who was hell-bent on ‘genocide’), would lead to a more democratic Libya with major advances in human rights, liberal-leftists assured us. In fact, the NATO attack on Libya turned the country into a failed state and a haven for jihadists.

Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State in 2011, played a prominent role in the destruction of Libya - so much so that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, in a recent interview with John Pilger, has labelled it 'Hillary’s war.'

But Libya has been quietly forgotten during the Presidential election campaign, as indeed has the Iraq war.

Liberal-leftists who couldn’t bear the sight of George W. Bush are lining up with pro-Iraq war hawks to try and get HRC elected.

Film-maker Michael Moore, who made the fiercely anti-Bush documentary, Fahrenheit 9-11, finds himself on the same side as Bush's speechwriter David Frum and Robert Kagan, co-founder of the Project for the New American Century. That would have seemed unthinkable a few years back, but it’s happening today, folks.

Why are America’s liberal-left doing this? It’s not as if Trump or Clinton are the only options: Dr Jill Stein's policies on social justice, war and peace, and climate change are far more progressive than Clinton’s. Why, instead of backing Stein, are they enabling Washington’s war lobby again, just as they did in 1999 and in 2011 during the bombing of Libya? Don't they ever learn their lesson? How naive are liberals to be fooled by the sudden neo-con concern for 'women's rights' and the rights of immigrants and gay people?

Make no mistake, the PNAC crowd are backing Clinton, not because they are appalled at sexist/racist or politically incorrect statements made by Donald Trump, but because they believe HRC will be the candidate who is more likely to continue the policy of endless war. More specifically, in regards to Syria, they want a US President who will prioritize on toppling the secular government of President Assad - not defeating ISIS. Trump’s great 'crime' in their eyes is that he does want to prioritize on ISIS - and horror of horrors - to work with Russia to defeat terrorism.

As America goes to the polls today, the stakes could not be higher. Clinton’s support for the imposition of a No-Fly Zone against Russian and Syrian aircraft risks starting World War Three, and the deaths of potentially hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people.

Is that what the ‘progressives’ who are lining up with the destroyers of Iraq really want?

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/365792-hi...on-neocons-us/
There are definately PNAC guys backing Trump.

John Bolton
Michael Ledeen
James Woolsey (trumps foreign policy team former CIA director)
Frank Gaffney
Ed Feulner. (Trump transition team)
Edwin Meese (Trump transition team)
Steve Forbes

It would appear more are backing Hillary but to me it's all part of the show.

Last edited by vancity eagle; 09-11-2016 at 02:28 AM.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 08:03 AM   #17
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Now the bankers who have been keeping the zombie banks alove with quantitative easing will let them crash and the system is going to blame trump and brexit for the collapsing economy
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 08:09 AM   #18
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,416 (2,494 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
Now the bankers who have been keeping the zombie banks alove with quantitative easing will let them crash and the system is going to blame trump and brexit for the collapsing economy
He hasn't even taken office yet and you are already making excuses for him.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 08:19 AM   #19
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
He hasn't even taken office yet and you are already making excuses for him.
no i said before the vote that if clinton won she'd get the blame for it but now trump has he is the one they will blame

They did the same with brexit where they blamed brexit for the falling pound and we haven't even had brexit yet

do you watch the keiser report?

they have been predicting another financial meltdown since 2008 except next time there will not be the funds available to bail out the banks and none of the problems that lead upto the 2008 crisis have been resolved so the same problems are arising

they talk about the system 'kicking the can down the road' by printing quantitative easing to keep the zombie banks alive by providing them with liquidity

the banks are already broken vancity...just look at deuscthbank which is in the process of collapsing and becasue the banks are all so exposed to each other it has a knock on effect like lehmans did

we saw the likes of soros threatening us with economic collapse BEFORE the brexit vote and we have seen some turbulence since it; we have also seen many fake lefties on social media and on the corporate media trying to blame brexit for all the economic problems that were already well sown before the brexit vote
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 09-11-2016 at 08:36 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2016, 08:25 AM   #20
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
There are definately PNAC guys backing Trump.

John Bolton
Michael Ledeen
James Woolsey (trumps foreign policy team former CIA director)
Frank Gaffney
Ed Feulner. (Trump transition team)
Edwin Meese (Trump transition team)
Steve Forbes

It would appear more are backing Hillary but to me it's all part of the show.
i do share your concerns vancity

i always thought that trump would be more disruptive to the NWO then hilary but i also have little faith that the system can produce positive results (hilary would have been a seemless transition of NWO control from obama to clinton...she was totally integrated into their command structure)

its like lenin said....the state is like a car that doesn't change course when you turn the steering wheel; that's because things are really controlled by the deep state; on that i think you and me are both agreed

so the question now is to what extent trump would or could challenge the direction of the deep state and the last president who directly challenged the deep state was murdered in dallas and his brother was killed after him

so....do i think trump is the messiah? no

so i'm relieved that clinton is not in but i am cautious rather then celebratory about trump becasue i don't think the answer lies in the system

i think the answer lies in decentralising power down to the people and that is the hard path to follow and most people still prefer to pin their hopes in an individual or political party and i can't think of any example in my lifetime where that has proven a success for the people

if trump actually managed to create positive change it would be an anomoly in my experience of politics

usually the party challenging for power makes lots of promises to the public to get into power but once they are in they just do what the NWO bankers want them to do; the concern is whether or not trump will do the same
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 09-11-2016 at 08:37 AM.
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.