Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > The Paranormal & Mysteries

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-08-2007, 05:23 PM   #1
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default Sasquatch a bear-person not an ape-person?

Sasquatch is usually thought to be some kind of ape-man. What if he is not a mix of ape and human genetics, but a bear-human hybrid? This is what Stewart Swerdlow says. Joan Ocean, who claims to be friends with the Sasquatch, maintains that they are close friends with the bear.

A grizzly has the size to contribute to the mix. Apes don't, really. Gorillas and Orangutans are huge, but extremely compact. They don't have the height to come anywhere near Sasquatch in size. The grizzly is just big. Add human-like bipedal characteristics and you have a Sasquatch-sized being.



supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 06:41 PM   #2
banjaxo
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

no offence but that looks like a man in a monkey suit to me
banjaxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 07:08 PM   #3
chattanova
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 6,868
Likes: 7 (7 Posts)
Default

__________________

OOPARTS http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11442

_____Truth Doesn't Fear Investigation_____
chattanova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 07:35 PM   #4
sweet cheeks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supertzar View Post
Sasquatch is usually thought to be some kind of ape-man. What if he is not a mix of ape and human genetics, but a bear-human hybrid? This is what Stewart Swerdlow says. Joan Ocean, who claims to be friends with the Sasquatch, maintains that they are close friends with the bear.

A grizzly has the size to contribute to the mix. Apes don't, really. Gorillas and Orangutans are huge, but extremely compact. They don't have the height to come anywhere near Sasquatch in size. The grizzly is just big. Add human-like bipedal characteristics and you have a Sasquatch-sized being.



NO.
__________________
The Longest Journey is the Journey Within.
sweet cheeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2007, 07:35 PM   #5
sweet cheeks
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chattanova View Post
YES!!
__________________
The Longest Journey is the Journey Within.
sweet cheeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 09:43 PM   #6
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banjaxo View Post
no offence but that looks like a man in a monkey suit to me
Never seen a monkey suit with such musculature and...breasts. Arms are too long, there are lots of reasons this is probably not a man-in-suit. Look at the stabilized and enhanced Patterson footage. The way it walks, the sheer size, the muscular definition, the face, everything points to it being legit.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=u6Khbis2GPw
supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 12:36 AM   #7
woghd
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

With the mountains of evidence, video, hair samples, footprints, eyewitness accounts, etc., even mainstream scientists are finally getting on board, and it looks like the winner will be gigantopithicus. Besides, bears don't have the right number of chromasomes to produce offspring with humans.

Archangel

Last edited by woghd; 03-09-2007 at 12:36 AM. Reason: typo
woghd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 02:55 PM   #8
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Besides, bears don't have the right number of chromasomes to produce offspring with humans.
It wouldn't be a bear actually mating with a human. We're talking genetic manipulation by aliens here.
supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 07:30 AM   #9
a fine naked fellow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 430
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I think they are more related to man, than either bear or ape.
__________________
The world is mine
a fine naked fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 08:42 AM   #10
hagbard_celine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 4 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supertzar View Post
Never seen a monkey suit with such musculature and...breasts. Arms are too long, there are lots of reasons this is probably not a man-in-suit. Look at the stabilized and enhanced Patterson footage. The way it walks, the sheer size, the muscular definition, the face, everything points to it being legit.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=u6Khbis2GPw
I'm a bigfoot believer through and through. BHM's (Big hairy men) are reported everywhere. They've appeared on every continent, even Antarctica, and are clearly some kind of archetype. I personally doubt that they are 100% physical beings at all. They often have ghost like abilities: they appear and dissappear and levitate etc. They also don't only appear in open forest and high mountains far from human habitation; they're often spotted in forested land or park estates in desnly-populated regions like England and the Netherlands where it would seem unlilkly that a race of physical beings could live undiscovered.

I'm afraid I have misgivings over the Petterson film. One fo the guys who did it confessed and said that it was one of their wives dressed up in fur.
__________________
"Lynda, you're sweet. From what I've seen of your world, do you think anybody votes for sweet?"
Doctor Who- Bad Wolf.

"Because he refused to compete in games for domination he was indomitable."
from The Dispossessed by Ursula le Guin
hagbard_celine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 12:41 PM   #11
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default

Pretty big fuckin' wife!

That's not the story carried in the media, anyway. It was Bob Hieronymous, I think is his name, who claimed to be the man-in-the-suit. No suit has ever been produced by anyone that looks like the being in that film.

Last edited by supertzar; 04-09-2007 at 12:44 PM.
supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 02:15 PM   #12
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 02:16 PM   #13
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The sythetic suits never look right, but if you used genuine skins of a gorilla...
albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 02:58 PM   #14
tinmenace
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,770
Likes: 14 (11 Posts)
Default

I know only that Sasquatch is some hairy creature of unknown origin and species. So, for those of you that know more (saves me having to do the research) - What is the southernmost location that these creatures have been seen?

Also, Yeti of the Himalayas - Does anyone remember reading in one of David's books about some kind of entrance to the underworld in the Tibet region? Could this creature come from there?

What if they are from the inner earth?

tinmenace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 03:04 PM   #15
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The genetic studies done on ORANG-PENDEK hairs are interesting. Showing a species of previously unknown ape.

Which shows it must be smart to avoid us so easily.

Last edited by albie; 04-09-2007 at 03:07 PM.
albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 03:05 PM   #16
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nMPmMJeEo...elated&search=

this deliberately faked apeman looks pretty convincing. addle the footage a bit and it would be pretty convincing.
albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 03:29 PM   #17
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default

Not very convincing at all. It looks like a guy in a suit. Where is the musculature? The longer arms? The impression of great weight? It's not even close.
supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 03:32 PM   #18
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The arms on the fake are longer than PG one!

Looks heavy to me.

the PG one looks fake to me. The more I see it the more I see a fat man. as for the muscles...where?
albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 05:07 PM   #19
supertzar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,455
Likes: 2,995 (1,865 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albie View Post
The arms on the fake are longer than PG one!
In the first frame it does look as long, but in the following frames it doesn't.

Quote:
Looks heavy to me.
Does it look as heavy?

Quote:
the PG one looks fake to me. The more I see it the more I see a fat man. as for the muscles...where?
You can clearly see the ridge formed by the spinal erectors. You can see the quadraceps moving. The triceps are also visible. Also, there is the face. You think it's a mask or makeup or that's just how the guy looks?
supertzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 05:34 PM   #20
albie
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 744
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I suppose his arms shrank? No.

Heavy or fat? Doesn't mean anything.

I see nothing of those muscular details. You must be magic. All that hair could easily confuse.
albie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bigfoot

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.