Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Entertainment Industry

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15-06-2015, 05:06 AM   #221
sweetangel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 131
Likes: 6 (4 Posts)
Default

Suggestions that Sgt. Pepper was about Crowley:

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341573.shtml

Quote:

'Clearly, the Beatles' album was dedicated to Satanist Aleister Crowley. It was released 20 years, nearly to the day, after Crowley's death in 1947, and its title song began with the lyrics, "It was twenty years ago today...'
__________________
The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand but listen only to reply.

"In the age of information
ignorance is a choice"
sweetangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2015, 05:37 AM   #222
phrased eyebrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 30 (29 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
Care to post some of those pictures for us to see?
I snapped my new av the other day.
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2015, 05:45 AM   #223
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default



kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2015, 05:58 AM   #224
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronisron View Post
More doubles?



Fun fact: John didn't actually die, he changed his name to 'Larry David' and became an American comedian.

kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2015, 12:14 PM   #225
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
Fun fact: John didn't actually die, he changed his name to 'Larry David' and became an American comedian.



McCartney is Seinfeld???

Well, at least he didn't turn into the guy on the left....

ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2016, 06:38 PM   #226
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

John was not replaced.


Paul was replaced.


Source: Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike

Last edited by revolv3r; 21-02-2016 at 07:10 PM.
Likes: (1)
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2016, 09:50 PM   #227
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revolv3r View Post
John was not replaced.


Paul was replaced.


Source: Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike
There are some sketchy pictures of Lennon too, the chin, nose, and ears don't match. The Beatles also went through a myriad of different looks from '65 to '70. Long hair, short hair, facial hair, no facial hair, glasses, not to mention different clothing. I think there were four guys originally, and part of their appeal was their everyman looks, which made it easy for them to be interchanged with other people a time or two. I think it was a colossal mind fuck in that they made these young men the most recognizable people on the planet, while also using different people to play them at different times. I don't think anyone was replaced, just swapped out with replacements once in a while. I think it was part of steering the public perception in the way they put a picture or some video footage out there, and tell the reader or viewer 'This is Person A". Maybe Person A is a politician, or a business head, or a famous actor. They look a little different.... hairstyle? Can't quite pin it down, but it must be Person A as stated because there's the girlfriend or wife, and everything appears as is.



Yes, the above is a joke picture with actors but at first glance....and a smaller picture size, it looks exactly as who they are pretending it to be. Now if someone with an agenda was really trying, they'd say these were both Paul McCartney



I'd say you have to take your pick. I don't think McCartney was murdered and replaced. Paul is still around and reaping the rewards of a job well done. Sir Paul, proud owner of an MBE since 1965.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2016, 06:45 AM   #228
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revolv3r View Post
Paul was replaced.



Same guy
kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2016, 05:09 PM   #229
brambles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 570
Likes: 708 (330 Posts)
Default

I think he was replaced for a much simpler reason. It's not possible for your eyes to change from brown to light blue.
Likes: (1)
brambles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2016, 08:05 PM   #230
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Yes, we know his replacement resembled him on occasion, just like "Queen Elizabeth" in the photo above.

But the facial features don't line up when scaled to the same eye spacing, as shown by the comparisons I posted above.

John Lennon's skull didn't change shape from 1964 to 1974. Why did Faul's?

And don't say it was the drugs. Lennon took more acid than the other 3 Beatles combined.

Last edited by revolv3r; 22-02-2016 at 08:13 PM.
Likes: (1)
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2016, 10:23 PM   #231
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

His skull didn't change shape though. The comparison pics you posted are terribly amateur.
kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 02:12 AM   #232
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
His skull didn't change shape though. The comparison pics you posted are terribly amateur.
Yes it's true. The person who made them (not me) was probably not paid for their services. Other than that, they are concrete proof that Paul was replaced with a doppelganger in late 1966.




Source: Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike

Last edited by revolv3r; 23-02-2016 at 02:56 AM.
Likes: (1)
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 02:30 AM   #233
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Here's a clipping from a 1969 New York Times magazine article by Jay Marks. The article was about the PID rumor that broke in the US in 1969. In England, the rumors went back to early 1967.

Likes: (1)
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 02:45 AM   #234
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Video evidence: 1966 Paul vs 1967 Faul. Note the change in voice, accent, mannerisms, and personality in less than 1 year. It's not the LSD. They had all been taking it since 1965.



For those who can't see it, enjoy your cognitive dissonance.

Living is easy with eyes closed.

Last edited by revolv3r; 23-02-2016 at 04:16 AM.
Likes: (1)
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 02:45 AM   #235
kasalt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,030
Likes: 49 (33 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronisron View Post
I watched this video last night;



Start watching from about 7:25 in moving forward. Those who are so inclined will immediately notice that as "reptilian shapeshifting" and the way it's displayed in the video is creepy as hell...Very nasty...
Looks pretty soily to me, but the cat in satin trousers said it's oily, you know he's right.





.
__________________


Last edited by kasalt; 23-02-2016 at 02:47 AM.
kasalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 03:45 AM   #236
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revolv3r View Post
Yes it's true. The person who made them (not me) was probably not paid for their services. Other than that, they are concrete proof that Paul was replaced with a doppelganger in late 1966.




Source: Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike
Yeah because Paul always had a tiny head in comparison to the others..

kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 04:14 AM   #237
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
Yeah because Paul always had a tiny head in comparison to the others..
Uh, both the John and Paul "before" heads come from the same 1966 album cover. Only "Paul's" head got bigger while he grew taller. Hmmmm.


Last edited by revolv3r; 23-02-2016 at 04:53 AM.
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 04:23 AM   #238
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Besides the fact that John's head is clearly bigger in the Sgt Pepper pic, do you genuinely not see the problem with scaling a picture of someone's head until it fits over top of another? or am I just getting trolled and wasting my time replying..
kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 04:24 AM   #239
revolv3r
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Likes: 10 (10 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
Besides the fact that John's head is clearly bigger in the Sgt Pepper pic, do you genuinely not see the problem with scaling a picture of someone's head until it fits over top of another? or am I just getting trolled and wasting my time replying..
They have been scaled so that the eye sockets line up. That's the only way the size of the heads can be accurately compared. Do you not understand the principle of relative scale? If you hold your mouse pointer near the eyes you can see they line up perfectly. The rest of the head doesn't line up because it's two different men.

John was a bit heavier and is smiling in the first photo. Regardless, his skeletal features match perfectly.



Faul's head size didn't change from 1967 to 1985:



His older self also matches the mysterious White Album photo:


Last edited by revolv3r; 23-02-2016 at 04:54 AM.
revolv3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2016, 12:07 PM   #240
kiwimaj
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,843
Likes: 15 (11 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronisron View Post
More doubles?



Personally, looking at the different piccies of John Lenon over the years, it's quite obvious different people were playing him.

And yes, I am one of those that Paul was replaced, again, looking at the older piccies of him, there IS a difference, well IMHO!

BUT as with most things, people will not see anything untoward
Likes: (1)
kiwimaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.