Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2009, 12:16 PM   #1
spaceman44
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Billinge, Wigan, UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Angry Shunned by parents about the vaccine.

I have been shunned by some parents at my daughters local school, for advising a few of my parent friends, not to let their child have the vaccine that is planned, some time when the school opens after the summer break. More exposure needs to implemented to advise parents of the situation regarding these deadly vaccines. I do my best to inform them, but they look at me as if I am crazy for saying such things, and putting these ideas in their children's heads. My 10 year old daughter knows everything about what's going on regarding the deadly vaccine and she quite openly tells all her friends at school. I don't mind my daughter knowing about the vaccine, in fact I promote it, and so should other parents, not to scare them but, to inform them of the situation. They have a right to know, considering it's them that are being targeted first. Does anyone disagree with me ? I wonder.

Last edited by spaceman44; 08-08-2009 at 12:17 PM.
spaceman44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 12:34 PM   #2
cafetimes1991
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

Sorry to hear that, spaceman.
This should galvanise us to get the TRUTH about the swine flu out there, through leaflets, videos etc so this isn't repeated. But it seems inevitable that it will, unfortunately.
I'm not sure if there will be poison injections when I return to school on 1 September. I hope not.
For the next while I will be focussing my activism on:
1. The Lisbon Treason
2. The swine flu ''vaccine''
__________________
"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."
— Sophie Scholl


cafetimes1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 12:46 PM   #3
windeyaho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The transmitter is near a river,next to an open field where there are animals,trees and a breeze.
Posts: 311
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

You are NOT wrong for telling your daughter the truth. When the polio vaccine first came out, they were brainwashing all the kids in school with a movie about it. I remember the movie they showed about the virus looking like big spiders in our bloodstream and the white corpuscles (after being vaccinated) were the good guys coming to save us from the "spiders". That movie pushed every button in a kids mind and I went home frightened.

My parents sat me down and discussed the whole thing with me. First, they told me THAT was just a movie and what really is supposed to happen is that the vaccine is supposed to put up a defense against anything coming INTO your system. However, they said, we don't believe in it and from the stats we're seeing coming through the news and TV, more kids are getting polio from the vaccine than seems safe so you will NOT be getting that vaccine or ANY vaccines. The last was because the school insisted that if we were going to refuse the polio vaccine then we had to refuse ALL vaccines. I'm glad they did.

I have had mumps, immune for life. I've had rubella, immune for life. Sat right next to a kid in school who broke out with chickenpox, never got it. All the hype about how dangerous these diseases are is just that, hype when it comes to kids. They are very serious if caught as an adult. Vaccinations only give you temporary immunity, if that. So all those vaccinated for childhood diseases will have to continue getting vaccinated in order not to catch stuff as adults. What a wonderful guarantee that the drug companies will make money on you your whole life.

If I had school age children now, I would be homeschooling. Besides the supposed "mandatory" vaccines (you can still say NO- it's just more complicated), I teach private music lessons to the current crop of kids and I see what they aren't learning. I also see the results of what all those vaccinations have done. However, in order to have an income and a roof over my head, I have to keep my mouth shut. That's why I am so thankful for forums like this. I can let off steam, maybe help someone and learn even more myself.
__________________
Find the one ember of truth, before you snuff out the fire of reason.
The Dying Ember

Avatar: This is a combination of 3 pieces of my own artwork (Indian Mist, Pony Feathers, and Musician's Dream).
windeyaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:03 PM   #4
cafetimes1991
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

A I recently made about 'vaccine' day at my prison (school).
__________________
"Somebody, after all, had to make a start. What we wrote and said is also believed by many others. They just don't dare express themselves as we did."
— Sophie Scholl



Last edited by cafetimes1991; 08-08-2009 at 01:04 PM.
cafetimes1991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:21 PM   #5
marpat
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,577
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman44 View Post
I have been shunned by some parents at my daughters local school, for advising a few of my parent friends, not to let their child have the vaccine that is planned, some time when the school opens after the summer break. More exposure needs to implemented to advise parents of the situation regarding these deadly vaccines. I do my best to inform them, but they look at me as if I am crazy for saying such things, and putting these ideas in their children's heads. My 10 year old daughter knows everything about what's going on regarding the deadly vaccine and she quite openly tells all her friends at school. I don't mind my daughter knowing about the vaccine, in fact I promote it, and so should other parents, not to scare them but, to inform them of the situation. They have a right to know, considering it's them that are being targeted first. Does anyone disagree with me ? I wonder.
And have you offered them any real proof that the vaccine is harmful? how does your daughter know everything? what you mean is that you have filled her mind with your own beliefs on the vaccine.

People do have a right to know about things but I think there tend to expect some form of proof or evidence, or at least a qualified opinion. You cant expect them to just believe you without something to back it all up.
marpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:30 PM   #6
cruise4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,865
Likes: 87 (62 Posts)
Default

Use leaflets and posters. It removes the oft-taken reaction against the messenger and puts an onus on them... although if your skin is thick enough there's nothing wrong with confronting them either.
cruise4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:38 PM   #7
qeutey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 180
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman44 View Post
My 10 year old daughter knows everything about what's going on regarding the deadly vaccine and she quite openly tells all her friends at school. I don't mind my daughter knowing about the vaccine, in fact I promote it, and so should other parents, not to scare them but, to inform them of the situation.
Have you taught her the dangers of pandemic flu, particularly given the age demographic of the current strain. Does she know about 1918/1919 when an estimated 50 million people died from swine flu.

Is what you have taught her balanced and informed or the "beliefs" of a limited few who post on internet sites like this.
qeutey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 03:21 PM   #8
decided
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

You may want to print this out and hand it to a few -

http://www.rense.com/general87/retired.htm
decided is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 03:23 PM   #9
decided
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Retired Vax Scientist Would
Never Vaccinate His Kids
From Ken Adachi
8-6-9

"If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination."
-Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport

Editor's Note -- This interview was posted by Jon Rappoport in early January 2002. You will discover by reading it that the very issues we now face of FORCED vaccination of a laboratory-created vaccine to "protect" us against a laboratory-created "disease" (Swine Flu, Bird flu, etc.) was set into motion a long time ago.

The vaccine researcher quoted here flat out says that the World Homicide Organization, WHO, is driven by a DEPOPULATION agenda, and that many African leaders know full well that the explosive spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa was caused by WHO-sponsored vaccinations of the 1970s.

This former pharmaceutical insider also debunks the widespread ASSUMPTIONS of vaccine "safety" promoted by orthodox medicine, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, state health departments, and their compliant media propagandists who are all parroting SUPERSTITIONS, rather than FACTS. --Ken Adachi

From Jon Rappoport (www.nomorefakenews.com)

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/rappo...rjan2002.shtml

January 2002

Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport: "If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination." (Aug. 6, 2009)

Jon Rappoport (Q) Interviews a Retired Vaccine Researcher (A) (given the pseudonym of "Dr. Mark Randall")

Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

Q: How were your findings received?

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

Q: And that happens?

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

Q: What was the turning point for you?

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Q: Did you investigate?

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

Q: What do you mean?

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: And that is what you found?

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

Q: Has it been enough?

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

Q: Which is?

A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

A: Yes I did.

Q: What happened?

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: This network you speak of.

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.

Q: A good idea.

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

Q: The things that are not there.

A: Yes.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."

As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Mark has been one of my sources.

He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.

He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.

Jon Rappoport
What can I say? People who don't research for themselves live a lie.
decided is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 08:06 PM   #10
largejack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: teesside
Posts: 9,386
Likes: 651 (281 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marpat View Post
And have you offered them any real proof that the vaccine is harmful? how does your daughter know everything? what you mean is that you have filled her mind with your own beliefs on the vaccine.

People do have a right to know about things but I think there tend to expect some form of proof or evidence, or at least a qualified opinion. You cant expect them to just believe you without something to back it all up.

Take a look at the ingredients of the vaccine that is enough to put me off off for life
__________________
Fools speak because they have to say something, wise men speak because they have something to say. PLATO. And then... there is Tony Blair.

It doesn't matter if this world is real or an illusion, the effects are still the same.
largejack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 11:02 PM   #11
rowantk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 359
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman44 View Post
I have been shunned by some parents at my daughters local school, for advising a few of my parent friends, not to let their child have the vaccine that is planned, some time when the school opens after the summer break. More exposure needs to implemented to advise parents of the situation regarding these deadly vaccines. I do my best to inform them, but they look at me as if I am crazy for saying such things, and putting these ideas in their children's heads. My 10 year old daughter knows everything about what's going on regarding the deadly vaccine and she quite openly tells all her friends at school. I don't mind my daughter knowing about the vaccine, in fact I promote it, and so should other parents, not to scare them but, to inform them of the situation. They have a right to know, considering it's them that are being targeted first. Does anyone disagree with me ? I wonder.
Good work. Its crazy peoples reactions to this. Its just another opinion. All it is, it attacks their belief systems. They feel threatend when someone says the government could be bad!
But you wouldn't by a car without looking into it? You wouldn't drink a liquid you found in an unmarked bottle? So why the hell would you inject something you havent looked into?.......
rowantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 11:47 PM   #12
spaceman44
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Billinge, Wigan, UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Thank you for your responses, I have already drafted some information leaflets to distribute to parents at the school at the beginning of term, this includes details of previous outbreaks of swine flu in the past and I shall be ready for any confrontation.
spaceman44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 11:59 PM   #13
paolo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 17 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman44 View Post
Thank you for your responses, I have already drafted some information leaflets to distribute to parents at the school at the beginning of term, this includes details of previous outbreaks of swine flu in the past and I shall be ready for any confrontation.
Like to see some of your information.
This is something so near, so apparently endtimes, such propaganda, such pressure. You know the economy is going to go totally down the hole as the result of the swine flu vaccine and the resultant second wave
This is so blatantly obvious and issuant from the WHO downwards. The propaganda is relentless
Some senor official from the flu planning committee was quoted in the Guardian a couple of days ago as saying that schools should be vaccination centres as they provide a"logical and realistic centre for vaccination, as they contain a captive audience" That's approximately the right quote and very sinister

Last edited by paolo; 09-08-2009 at 12:01 AM.
paolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:35 AM   #14
lizzy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,287
Likes: 31 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marpat View Post
And have you offered them any real proof that the vaccine is harmful? how does your daughter know everything? what you mean is that you have filled her mind with your own beliefs on the vaccine.

People do have a right to know about things but I think there tend to expect some form of proof or evidence, or at least a qualified opinion. You cant expect them to just believe you without something to back it all up.
Marpet, you are becoming a dangerous person to have around here.....I don't care that you think chemtrails don't exist or that the military is a fine upstanding and moral entity......BUT these weaponized vaccinations effect us and our families directly and you have the gall to come here and berate a concerned and informed parent . Who the fuck are you to tell anyone!!!!

edit.....sorry if this in anyway "derailed" this thread.....I won't be answering anything marpet posts here)

Last edited by lizzy; 09-08-2009 at 04:40 AM.
lizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:40 AM   #15
ustane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In 528 Hertz
Posts: 610
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I sympathise, spaceman, I had a terrible time being convincing. People will react like that, they've been told for years it's good for them (tell a lie often enough it's believed). They can't get their heads around it that a malevolent intent is at the centre, it opens up a whole deeper conspiracy. The news is too bad. We're facing huge challenges. That's cool what you'e done with the leaflets etc, well done, all the best

Last edited by ustane; 09-08-2009 at 04:53 AM.
ustane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 04:52 AM   #16
lizzy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,287
Likes: 31 (18 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paolo View Post
Like to see some of your information.
This is something so near, so apparently endtimes, such propaganda, such pressure. You know the economy is going to go totally down the hole as the result of the swine flu vaccine and the resultant second wave
This is so blatantly obvious and issuant from the WHO downwards. The propaganda is relentless
Some senor official from the flu planning committee was quoted in the Guardian a couple of days ago as saying that schools should be vaccination centres as they provide a"logical and realistic centre for vaccination, as they contain a captive audience" That's approximately the right quote and very sinister

Indeed paolo,.....I think this is a full on attack on our health and freedom. Even the msm is giving us info to it's unreliability and how totalitarian the shots will be administered. We will become the incubators ( fast breeders) of the more lethal strain that is said will emerge. It is those who receive the shot that are going to be the problem.
lizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 10:11 AM   #17
rowantk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 359
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I've been telling my friends and family about all of this. Most seem like they wont take it. Which is great! Apart from my sister who seems a little 'brainwashed' fingers crossed she wont.
A friend of mine supposingly had the flu a few weeks ago. He was sent Tamiflu in the post. He only took a tiny bit of it before it gave him the shits. He then stopped and got better on his own.
rowantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 10:25 AM   #18
ian2day
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ian2day.com
Posts: 8,903
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Post

A cull orchastrated by Reptillians is on the agenda.
ian2day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 12:46 PM   #19
ustane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In 528 Hertz
Posts: 610
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marpat View Post
And have you offered them any real proof that the vaccine is harmful? how does your daughter know everything? what you mean is that you have filled her mind with your own beliefs on the vaccine.

People do have a right to know about things but I think there tend to expect some form of proof or evidence, or at least a qualified opinion. You cant expect them to just believe you without something to back it all up.
Google video: "Dr Len Horowitz, In Lies We Trust", and

www.drlenhorowitz.com

'What they don't tell you about vaccincations' (also on the homepage on David's website) at

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...n-dangers.aspx

Ghiislaine Lanctot MD who wrote the book 'The medical Mafia'

-
where David Rockerfella talks about population control

Last edited by ustane; 09-08-2009 at 01:12 PM.
ustane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2009, 01:05 PM   #20
tracker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,347
Likes: 4 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spaceman44 View Post
I have been shunned by some parents at my daughters local school, for advising a few of my parent friends, not to let their child have the vaccine that is planned, some time when the school opens after the summer break. More exposure needs to implemented to advise parents of the situation regarding these deadly vaccines. I do my best to inform them, but they look at me as if I am crazy for saying such things, and putting these ideas in their children's heads. My 10 year old daughter knows everything about what's going on regarding the deadly vaccine and she quite openly tells all her friends at school. I don't mind my daughter knowing about the vaccine, in fact I promote it, and so should other parents, not to scare them but, to inform them of the situation. They have a right to know, considering it's them that are being targeted first. Does anyone disagree with me ? I wonder.
I am sorry to hear you have been shunned and treated this way .

I am however wondering how you have told your daughter about this situation . I do not think it fair my self that some one so young should know about this stuff . After all now she will appear abnormal to those in her school . Going around saying "dont get the vaccines" can end up making her a school oddbod -- castout .the children will eventually shunn her as you have been shunned by their parents .

Fine ; if you are going to keep your daughter safe from these poisons by all means do so -------as i plan to do so aswell .

Yet it seems you have been desperate to walk around blurting out what you know , and if anything you should know what society is like , and now you have bought this down upon your child . ( boy is she going to pay for all this too as she has to be with them folks everday forthe next how many years )

Ok you could tell her that she doesnt need it because she has a good immune system because she eats good food and keeps healthy , but from how you have put this across ( correct me if im wrong ) that your daughter is going around telling every one not to have the vaccine , to which tends to indicate that she has all the gory details . something that I do not think is a good idea .

You could make it better though .

You could tell the adults that you were mistaken and read some hype and now dont believe it and will get the vaccination .

you dont have too , its just for your childs social life in school if you get my drift .
Otherwise , you know that their mentality is thick and slow and they dont have their own mind so why fight it ? and then bring your daughters social life into difficulties .

Im only saying --thats all .I dont mean any offence or anything bad towards you .

use the prison rules to move around in more easy .


see how here

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=76039

Last edited by tracker; 09-08-2009 at 01:06 PM.
tracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.