Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Electronic Harassment / Mind Control / Subliminal Programing

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-08-2013, 07:58 PM   #1
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Pseudo Occult Misinformation

Pseudo Occult Media (pseudoccultmedia.net) is a blog written by Benedict, aka Benjamin Singleton, all about which celebrities have been abused as children. Benedict solicits donations for detailed speculation about said abuse, such as his claim that a certain underage celebrity was shocked by a cattle prod by her sexually abusive father. He also joked about how another famous celebrity's father may have given her lip injections as part of the abuse. Neither of these claims were backed by any evidence whatsoever. Doesn't this seem like an invasion of privacy? Even if the claims are true, what celebrity is going to appreciate random bloggers speculating in graphic detail about their abuse histories? Probably not very many. Benedict says it's ok because mind-controlled celebrities have been programmed as sex slave prostitutes by the CIA and the Freemasons. This is called Monarch programming and it involves satanic cults. At least one person, fashion designer Alexander McQueen, committed suicide after it was heavily suggested that he abused his models on pseudoccultmedia. Benedict goes by the pseudonym Benjamin and has posted a photo of a kid who looks to be about 19, claiming it to be himself. Here's what he really looks like. Check out his Facebook and Twitter pages to find references to multiple personality disorder and satanic Disney. He and a colleague have plans to start up a combination cult and corporation based on the Freemasons. It's definitely the same guy.

Click link for photo:http://pseudoccultmisinfo.blogspot.c...n-returns.html


Benedict claims to be very concerned about how rape is being glamorized in the media. He makes sure everyone knows how much rape is glamorized in the media by posting literally hundreds of photos with subject matter like girls chained to beds as well as paparazzi sex photos that celebrities didn't even agree to have taken. Here's a direct quote about a 16-year-old celebrity from the blog, whose name has been removed to avoid contributing to further voyeurism, “*******'s latest photos were her in a inky purple/white/silver top sans bra. Before this was the standard ritual humiliation all the Media Monarchs go through...don't think an uncensored version exists on the net... Some good ol' fashioned blatant Monarch imagery now to finish; with her green bicycle wheels + fairy + ELECTRA (electroshock/mythology; bike company) + flowers...Electra Complex (i.e. this make of bike is hinting at ***** ******'s relationship with his daughter?)”. For those who aren't familiar with Freud, Wikipedia defines the Electra Complex as "a child’s psychosexual competition with her mother for possession of her father". But surely Benedict just wants to help all the poor mind-controlled sex slaves by exposing their handlers to the world. Uh, right.

Click link for photos: http://pseudoccultmisinfo.blogspot.c...n-returns.html

What you see above is a screen shot of Benedict liking a Facebook comment that expresses appreciation for a court decision stating that it's legal to shoot a prostitute who won't have sex with you in Texas due to property crime laws. I'll bet the parents of the woman who was killed would be thrilled to know that random internet strangers find their daughter's death to be so amusing. Does it seem like Benedict's angry about something? Could it be that his obsession with the dehumanization and childhood sexual abuse of celebrities represents a way to get back at all the females who've rejected him throughout life? My magic 8 ball says chances are close to 100%. Now he's trying to get paid for posting his celebrity rape revenge fantasies all over the net. This guy has attended several expensive colleges, has a comfortable job in the service design industry and enough money to be flying all around the U.S. and Europe. If you want to donate to an organization that's actually helping people heal from issues of cult abuse, then consider donating to Survivorship instead of to this clown. Any money contributed to their organization goes directly to survivors of multi-perpetrator abuse, who are the people most in need of support in this situation.

Last edited by bacopa; 01-09-2013 at 07:06 PM.
bacopa is offline  
Old 31-08-2013, 08:41 PM   #2
palestine_hill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: it's a secret
Posts: 388
Likes: 2 (1 Post)
Default

I press like on a lot of things and it only means that I have taken note of it and not that i like it. I am suspicious about asking for donations for him to tell you about celebrity because i doubt they told him and if they did they certainly would not appreciate him betraying their confidence. I personally would not go on that website.
__________________
Funny you're the broken one but I'm the only one that needed saving.
Weak as I am, am I too much for you?
Just gonna stand there and watch me cry, but that's alright cause I love the way you lie.
Just gonna stand there and let me burn, but that's okay cause I like the way it hurt.
All it takes for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing.
.
palestine_hill is offline  
Old 31-08-2013, 11:55 PM   #3
smashstuff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 111 (43 Posts)
Default

This is a bit silly isn't it? Where is the proof that Benjamin Singleton is the same person as Benedict Singleton? I'm not seeing a connection at all. This whole write up is low I.Q. shite.

Unproven links between people with similar names, 'it's definitely the same guy', then damning the whole blog because this other guy thumbs up killing prostitutes on facebook? Come on mate, get a grip.
__________________
?

Last edited by smashstuff; 01-09-2013 at 12:13 AM.
smashstuff is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:19 PM   #4
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by smashstuff View Post
This is a bit silly isn't it? Where is the proof that Benjamin Singleton is the same person as Benedict Singleton? I'm not seeing a connection at all. This whole write up is low I.Q. shite.

Unproven links between people with similar names, 'it's definitely the same guy', then damning the whole blog because this other guy thumbs up killing prostitutes on facebook? Come on mate, get a grip.
Since you asked, I've included a screen shot of a tweet posted by the Department of No, a design studio co-founded by Benedict Singleton. The tweet describes Mickey Mouse as involved with “sex things” and "violent things”, also referring to him as a “satanic totem”. Wikipedia describes a totem as “a being, object, or symbol”. "Benjamin" is preoccupied by Disney stars being victims of Monarch programming (and often victims of Satanic cults) who advertise this fact through the use of satanic symbolism in clothing and set designs. Benedict referred to a Disney figure as a satanic symbol. There is also the detail of both Benedict and “Benjamin” having complained about the difficulties of beginning the initial phases of PhD work around the time period of Spring 2010. Go look it up yourself and you'll see there are numerous references to PhD work on both pseudoccultmedia and Benedict's twitter feed during Spring 2010.

In case that's not enough, Benedict complained again, in an August 29 twitter post, that Miley Cyrus' VMA performance wasn't sexy enough, and his twitter follower compared the performance to a Disney lap dance. “Benjamin” appears to have had quite the fixation on Miley, especially when she was around 15-16 years old, even posing with an arm around a wax statue of her in “his” photo that was posted to Red Ice Creations. Benedict's twitter feed contained a joke from another twitter follower about MPD, which he responded to with a tweet that said “Silence, Vickytnz.” The original joke about multiple personality disorder has since been removed. And last but not least, in his essay, Anthropocene Nights(go to the blog for a link), Benedict refers to a project he started with a colleague that is modeled off of the Freemasons. “Benjamin” has written ad nauseum about the Freemasons, who he says are involved with Monarch mind control as programmers.

What is the likelihood that two separate people will both be fixated on the Freemasons, write about Disney's satanic symbolism and also start a PhD during the same time frame? Case closed.

But thanks for providing the opportunity to outline further evidence. You're obviously destined for the high I.Q. Mensa society given the adept grasp on logic and research that you've demonstrated in this thread.
bacopa is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:20 PM   #5
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palestine_hill View Post
I am suspicious about asking for donations for him to tell you about celebrity because i doubt they told him and if they did they certainly would not appreciate him betraying their confidence.
Exactly. If you want to find out about Monarch programming then read Fritz Springmeier or the testimonies of victims who agreed to have their abuse history in the public eye in the first place. There's enough information already out there that violating people's privacy is not even necessary.

Last edited by bacopa; 01-09-2013 at 07:29 PM.
bacopa is offline  
Old 02-09-2013, 12:28 AM   #6
smashstuff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 111 (43 Posts)
Default

I still don't understand what axe you have to grind here? This was your very first post on this forum, and the Godlike Productions as well I presume, it's a funny thing to start off with.

Quote: 'At least one person, fashion designer Alexander McQueen, committed suicide after it was heavily suggested that he abused his models on pseudoccultmedia.'


Do you really think that Alexander McQueen killed himself because he read some random blog? And let's say that these two guys are one and the same, which I'm not convinced by, so what? What is it that is so evil about 'Benedict' Singleton that has pissed you off? Is it possible that you could ask him if he is 'Benjamin' Singleton by e-mail or twitter?

Quote:
'In case that's not enough, Benedict complained again, in an August 29 twitter post, that Miley Cyrus' VMA performance wasn't sexy enough,'



Is that really what this tweet says, that the performance wasn't sexy enough? Really?

Also, where is the picture of him with his arm around a wax Miley Cyrus? Can we have a screenshot of that please?
__________________
?

Last edited by smashstuff; 02-09-2013 at 02:55 AM.
smashstuff is offline  
Old 03-09-2013, 02:59 PM   #7
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacopa View Post
Benedict solicits donations for detailed speculation about said abuse, such as his claim that a certain underage celebrity was shocked by a cattle prod by her sexually abusive father.
The ability to edit has passed but I should revise this statement to say that he speculated the girl was shocked with a cattle prod by media handlers, not her father specifically, although he did claim the father molested her, again without evidence.

Here is another direct pseudoccultmedia quote about the same girl. It's a bit hard to argue that the intent isn't to be salacious. "The recent controversy shows ****** doing what she does best, apparently giving ****** ******* (producer/director/choreographer) a lapdance and straddling a chair, like the stripper/sex-slave she is.....There is also the small matter of the blowjob leaked photo, which I don't think was actually proven fake (see comments on the linked article; uncensored photo here". If the point is to argue that the media exploits young girls, then this blog (and others like it) are complicit in that exploitation by continuing to circulate paparazzi sex photos that, in many areas, would qualify as child pornography.

Last edited by bacopa; 03-09-2013 at 03:04 PM.
bacopa is offline  
Old 03-09-2013, 03:03 PM   #8
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smashstuff View Post
Do you really think that Alexander McQueen killed himself because he read some random blog?
Celebrities are known to have higher rates of suicide and mental illness in part because having every facet of their lives under public scrutiny can be extremely stressful. It's entirely possible that there was a cumulative negative emotional effect resulting from McQueen having absorbed numerous media attack pieces, including the one on Pseudo Occult Media. There's no way to know for sure unless you knew the guy personally. What is undeniable is that any time a person makes a serious public allegation there is always the possibility that the accusation can ruin someone's life. That's why I think it's a good idea to expose someone who has a habit of accusing people of serious crimes without substantial evidence or first hand knowledge. Pseudoccultmedia isn't the only blog or site responsible for false allegations by any means (plenty of people in the Stepford Wives thread do it as well), just the most egregious. There have been so many people accused of murder and child molestation on that blog that it's not even funny. In this particular situation, one of the worst effects of false allegations is that they tend to make outsiders dismiss Monarch programming as a hoax, and who can blame them considering how often someone mistakes an all-seeing eye t-shirt as evidence that someone is a Monarch “handler” or the next Hitler?

And let's say that these two guys are one and the same, which I'm not convinced by, so what? What is it that is so evil about 'Benedict' Singleton that has pissed you off?
If you want to contribute money to someone who thinks it's ok to kill prostitutes that don't provide their customers with sex, then that's up to you. Gotta wonder about your value system though if you don't see a problem with that. Personally I think it's beyond disingenuous for Benedict to be running around spouting off stuff like that then returning to pseudoccultmedia to wring his hands about how all the sex in the media is corrupting the youth.

Also, where is the picture of him with his arm around a wax Miley Cyrus? Can we have a screenshot of that please?
One of two fake photos intended to represent “Benjamin” can be found here:
http://www.pseudoccultmedia.net/2009...-noah-and.html

Is it possible that you could ask him if he is 'Benjamin' Singleton by e-mail or twitter?
There isn't much point in asking considering that Benedict deletes tweets and pics in order to conceal his identity. That isn't exactly the mark of someone who's going to be forthcoming when you ask them a direct question. But if you feel the need to get in touch then by all means go ahead. You might also consider contacting Vicky Teinaki (twitter.com/vickytnz) to ask why she made a joke about multiple personality disorder, and why it was removed from Benedict's twitter feed.

Is that really what this tweet says, that the performance wasn't sexy enough? Really?
Yes, that's exactly what it says.
bacopa is offline  
Old 04-09-2013, 12:01 AM   #9
smashstuff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 111 (43 Posts)
Default

Thanks, here's the picture in question:



This supposedly is the non-existent 'Benjamin' right? You say it is fake because this guy doesn't actually exist? So who's face is it? He finds pics of this guy for his red ice radio interview with shorter hair, and then expertly photoshops another pic (with longer hair) for the miley pic?

Anyway, there are two videos on vimeo of 'Benedict Singleton' here

http://vimeo.com/search?q=benedict+singleton

so you can compare his voice with 'Benjamin' Singleton here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkinHGwm3I

Now call me crazy, but there voices to me don't sound similar, and the speech patterns completely different.

And once again if you really think that this twitter message,

is really saying that 'Miley Cyrus' VMA performance wasn't sexy enough', I think we're done.
__________________
?

Last edited by smashstuff; 04-09-2013 at 12:08 AM.
smashstuff is offline  
Old 04-09-2013, 02:50 PM   #10
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Are you unaware that the twitter quote you posted was part of a larger conversation, or was that a deliberate attempt to take the quote out of context? Given that the image you posted appears to be cropped, and the screen shows a prompt to “hide conversation”, indicating that it's visible, I'm inclined to believe you were fully aware that your were quoting him out of context.




Benedict was responding to a tweet about Miley's VMA performance when he stated “And WTF is with the tongue? Jesus fucking Christ, it's not sexy, it's like a symptom of a serious neurological condition.” Let's contrast that with “Benjamin's” statement from a May 2010 pseudoccultmedia post, “Miley's painful looking movie 'The Last Song' (from the author of 'The Notebook'... kill me now, I am not sitting through this!) has Miley's daddy played by Greg Kinnear (whose father worked for the government, has been in some pertinent movies) in an interesting looking T-Shirt, wink wink from her handlers ?” Sounds a bit similar, doesn't it? And what's up with the winking smiley face? If “Benjamin” really believes these celebrities have been tortured and abused then what's up with all the winking and smiling?

Couldn't get a complete image capture because of the ad, but the quote above can be found here:

http://www.pseudoccultmedia.net/2010...ves-cyrus.html

The voice patterns sound similar to me.

As for the kid in the photo, I have no idea who he is but chances are good he would not appreciate having his image used for Benedict's posts about father-daughter incest conspiracies. Think about it. Most people would not want their future employers to be reading that kind of thing. It's obviously a fake photo. It would be very easy to find those images by checking out some random social media profiles and selecting photos from different time periods. That much should be obvious.

Last edited by bacopa; 04-09-2013 at 02:57 PM.
bacopa is offline  
Old 14-09-2013, 06:41 PM   #11
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Here is a photo of Benedict Singleton, the actual author of Pseudo Occult Media.



And a post to his Facebook feed, which has since been deleted.



Once again, what you see below is a screen shot of Benedict liking a Facebook comment that expresses appreciation for a court decision stating that it's legal to shoot a prostitute who won't have sex with a client in Texas due to property crime laws.



And here is one more reference to the Illuminati on Benedict's twitter feed, for anyone who is absolutely determined to bury their head in the sand.



Also consider the following quote from Benedict's essay, Anthropocene Nights, , "ARK-INC (2006 - present), an ongoing collaboration between the author and JonArdern, imagines an organisation combining features of a corporation, a grassroots social movement and a cult. It fashions itself after communities that have proven sustainable under huge duress (from the Freemasons to the French Resistance to Al Qaida), offering its fee-paying members the training and equipment they will need to not only survive but prosper in conditions of generalised social and environmental collapse.”

The essay can be found here. http://www.academia.edu/2412286/Anthropocene_Nights

Last edited by bacopa; 14-09-2013 at 06:43 PM.
bacopa is offline  
Old 20-09-2013, 09:29 PM   #12
bacopa
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Here's another direct quote from the blog, describing photos of prepubescent girls, one of whom was nine years old at the time the photos were taken, “****** and ***** with their puppies, note their matching cherries dresses (cherry = loss of virginity/breaking of hymen, discussed in previous posts)...***** and ******'s recent showing at *********'s (below) 19th birthday in obviously inappropriate clothing (all just innocent "dress ups" of course ;p) caused some mild controversy on the internet for obvious reasons...Another random one with them in the bath (again I feel this all points to their blatant pedophilic mindset...”

For anyone who reads Pseudoccultmedia, Vigilant Citizen or the like, would you appreciate if you or a loved one was abused by a family member and random strangers joked about the details of that abuse on the internet? No? Then why is it ok when people do the same to celebrities? If you're really concerned about it, why not volunteer at a domestic violence shelter or rape crisis hotline? A lot of those places are seriously under-funded and under-staffed, so you might just be a lot more helpful there than you would be at home, hunting for pentragrams in fashion magazines. As for Monarch programming, from the way it seems most people stressing out about occult symbols in the media don't have personal experience with it. The best source of information about Monarch programming will always be the research of people like Springmeier or Kathleen Sullivan, who actually have first hand experience with the project.

Here is a direct quote from ritual abuse and mind control survivor Kathleen Sullivan, “To protect the privacy of family members who acknowledge that they,too, were victimized, I will not reveal information from a number of their documents in my possession that directly verify some of my memories. Their stories belong to them. While I have my stepmother’s express permission to name and write about some of my experiences with my father, I have not released the names of my stepmother, mother, ex-husband, maternal grandparents, or surviving daughter. If you happen to know their names or identities,please do not reveal them to others.”

In all likelihood, Sullivan chose to protect her family members' privacy because she knows the damage that can result from a victim being forced to confront the memories of their abuse in a public setting. Generally speaking, protecting the identity of victims is considered common courtesy within ritual abuse survivor communities. So why are there so many mind control “researchers” out there who feel that what they have to say is so special that they should be held to a different code of ethics than the survivors themselves?
bacopa is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.