Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Electronic Harassment / Mind Control / Subliminal Programing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2019, 04:34 PM   #161
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

5g Dangers Israel Not Using 5g For a Good Reason! Learn Why Here

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2019, 11:16 AM   #162
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

5G wireless networks could 'KILL YOU' and the environment – scientists claim
By Matt Drake
2nd January 2019

'The world’s first 5G smartphones will be rolling out in 2019, but it could potentially spell disaster for humans and the environment, according to a group of scientists.

Nearly 30,000 people – including scientists, doctors and environmental organisations – have signed a petition on the website 5gspaceappeal.org.

It appeals for major world organisations, such as the UN, World Health Organisation (WHO), and EU to “urgently halt the development of 5G”.

But many mainstream scientists dismiss the claims and there is no conclusive proof of cancer causing radiation from phones.
The WHO said there has been no evidence of detrimental effects caused by mobile phones despite studies conducted over two decades.

According to the site, wireless networks are "harmful for humans” and the development of the next generation is “defined as a crime” under international law.

The website states: “We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organisations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites.

“5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place.'
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/lat...echnology-news
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2019, 12:58 PM   #163
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

The Truth About 5G - Dr Graham Downing

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2019, 11:39 AM   #164
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

UN Staff Member: 5G Is War on Humanity
1 day ago
Claire Edwards



Disclosure about 5G — and its considerable risk for humanity — is occurring within the United Nations. This is thanks to longtime UN staff member and whistle-blower Claire Edwards, who recently contacted me with this powerful story which touches all of humanity and our shared future. Watch the interview above, or on YouTube here or on Facebook here. -Josh del Sol Beaulieu

The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind.

This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured.

In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months.

I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres[transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails.

As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.[3]

Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4] Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law[5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you?

I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8]

Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10]
https://takebackyourpower.net/un-sta...r-on-humanity/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2019, 04:41 PM   #165
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Timelines of Sickness and Death Documented After Cell Towers Were Installed in U.S. Locations
BN Frank
January 6, 2019

Most would agree that firefighters are some of the bravest among us. That’s why it’s noteworthy that the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) has opposed the use of their stations for cell towers and antennas since 2004. Their website has many pages of research that they reference to support this opposition. Some of it was conducted on firefighters.

**Note: A pilot study was conducted in 2004 of six California fire fighters working and sleeping in stations with towers. The study, conducted by Gunnar Heuser, M.D., PhD. of Agoura Hills, CA, focused on neurological symptoms of six fire fighters who had been working for up to five years in stations with cell towers. Those symptoms included slowed reaction time, lack of focus, lack of impulse control, severe headaches, anesthesia-like sleep, sleep deprivation, depression, and tremors. Dr. Heuser used functional brain scans – SPECT scans – to assess any changes in the brains of the six fire fighters as compared to healthy brains of men of the same age. Computerized psychological testing known as TOVA was used to study reaction time, impulse control, and attention span. The SPECT scans revealed a pattern of abnormal change which was concentrated over a wider area than would normally be seen in brains of individuals exposed to toxic inhalation, as might be expected from fighting fires. Dr. Heuser concluded the only plausible explanation at this time would be RF radiation exposure. Additionally, the TOVA testing revealed among the six fire fighters delayed reaction time, lack of impulse control, and difficulty in maintaining mental focus.

read on here:
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/01...locations.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 07-01-2019 at 04:42 PM.
Likes: (3)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2019, 04:47 PM   #166
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

5G dangers, 60GHz millimeter wave micro cell dangers, and stupid, evil elected representatives

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 07-01-2019 at 04:47 PM.
Likes: (3)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 01:30 AM   #167
decim
Senior Member
 
decim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 2,943 (1,660 Posts)
Arrow https://eluxemagazine.com/magazine/dangers-of-5g/

Frightening Frequencies: The Dangers of 5G & What You Can Do About Them


By Jody McCutcheon
As the old saying goes, give us an inch and inevitably we’ll want a mile. And certainly, this sentiment is true with technology.
Who doesn’t want faster, bigger (or smaller), more efficient? Take wireless mobile telecommunications. Our current broadband cellular network platform, 4G (or fourth generation), allows us to transmit data faster than 3G and everything that preceded. We can access information faster now than ever before in history. What more could we want? Oh, yes, transmission speeds powerful enough to accommodate the (rather horrifying) so-called Internet of Things. Which brings us to 5G.
Until now, mobile broadband networks have been designed to meet the needs of people. But 5G has been created with machines’ needs in mind, offering low-latency, high-efficiency data transfer. It achieves this by breaking data down into smaller packages, allowing for faster transmission times. Whereas 4G has a fifty-millisecond delay, 5G data transfer will offer a mere one-millisecond delay–we humans won’t notice the difference, but it will permit machines to achieve near-seamless communication. Which in itself may open a whole Pandora’s box of trouble for us – and our planet.


More bandwidth – more dangers of 5G

Let’s start with some basic background on 5G technology. Faster processing speeds require more bandwidth, yet our current frequency bandwidths are quickly becoming saturated. The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.
High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticeable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas every few feet, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighbourhood.
Here are some numbers to put things into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radiofrequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.

Serious health concerns

First, it’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen and specified that the use of mobile phones could lead to specific forms of brain tumors.
Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:
  • DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
  • oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
  • disruption of cell metabolism
  • increased blood-brain barrier permeability
  • melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
  • disruption of brain glucose metabolism
  • generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)
As mentioned, the new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners. The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigours of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR flying around us. It’s no wonder that apprehension exists over potential risks, to both human and environmental health.
Perhaps the strongest concern involves adverse effects of MMWs on human skin. This letter to the Federal Communications Commission, from Dr Yael Stein of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, outlines the main points. Over ninety percent of microwave radiation is absorbed by the epidermis and dermis layers, so human skin basically acts as an absorbing sponge for microwave radiation. Disquieting as this may sound, it’s generally considered acceptable so long as the violating wavelengths are greater than the skin layer’s dimensions. But MMW’s violate this condition.
Furthermore, the sweat ducts in the skin’s upper layer act like helical antennas, which are specialized antennas constructed specifically to respond to electromagnetic fields. With millions of sweat ducts, and 5G’s increased RFR needs, it stands to reason that our bodies will become far more conductive to this radiation. The full ramifications of this fact are presently unclear, especially for more vulnerable members of the public (e.g., babies, pregnant women, the elderly), but this technology
Furthermore, MMWs may cause our pain receptors to flare up in recognition of the waves as damaging stimuli. Consider that the US Department of Defense already uses a crowd-dispersal method called the Active Denial System, in which MMWs are directed at crowds to make their skin feel like it’s burning, and also has the ability to basically microwave populations to death from afar with this technology if they choose to do so. And the telecommunications industry wants to fill our atmosphere with MMWs?

Other distressing research

Unfortunately, innocent animals have already been the victims of testing to see MMW’s effects on living cells. Extrapolating the results from animal testing to humans isn’t straightforward, but the results nonetheless raise some serious red flags. Perhaps most significantly, a US National Toxicology Program study noted that male rats exposed to RFR for nine hours a day over two years developed rare forms of tumours in the brain and heart, and rats of both sexes developed DNA damage.
The researchers noted that the increased risk to the rats was relatively small; but if these findings translate to humans, the widespread increase in cellphone use could have a significant impact on populations. Thus the NTP study served to renew the debate about the potential harmful effects of cellphones on human health. Not only that, it caused a significant shift in the American Cancer Society’s understanding of radiation and cancer, and sparked them to state that our ignorance of RFR’s impact on human health could be compared to our previous obliviousness to the connection between smoking and lung cancer.
Other animal research worldwide illustrates how microwave radiation in general and MMW’s in particular can damage the eyes and immune system, cell growth rate, even bacterial resistance. An experiment at the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University showed that 60GHz millimeter-wave antennas produce thermal injuries in rabbit eyes, with thermal effects reaching below the eye’s surface. This study, meanwhile, suggests low-level MMW’s caused lens opacity–a precursor to cataracts–in rats’ eyes. A Chinese study demonstrated that eight hours’ of microwave radiation damaged rabbits’ lens epithelial cells. A Pakistani study concluded that exposure to mobile phone EMF prevented chicken embryo retinal cells from properly differentiating.
This Russian study revealed that exposing healthy mice to low-intensity, extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation severely compromised their immune systems. And a 2016 Armenian study concluded that low-intensity MMW’s not only depressed the growth of E. coli and other bacteria, but also changed certain properties and activity levels of the cells. The same Armenian study noted that MMW interaction with bacteria could lead to antibiotic resistance–distressing news, considering immunity to bacteria is already compromised due to the overuse of antibiotics.
Again, if these findings translate to humans, our rampant cellphone use would likely cause profound, adverse health effects; an increase in MMW’s as more bandwidth is introduced could further complicate the matter. But what’s also important to note here is that 5G technologies will not only have a profound impact on human health, but on the health of all living organisms it touches, including plants, as we shall see.

5G harms the planet, too

Equally disturbing, 5G technology puts environmental health at risk in a number of ways. First, MMWs may pose a serious threat to plant health. This 2010 study showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings exposed to RFR exhibited symptoms of necrosis, while another Armenian study suggested low-intensity MMW’s cause “peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes”–basically a stress response that damages cells–in wheat shoots. Plant irradiation is bad news for the planet’s flora, but it’s bad news for us, too: it could contaminate our food supply.
Second, the 5G infrastructure would pose a threat to our planet’s atmosphere. Network implementation will require the deployment of many, short-lifespan satellites via suborbital rockets propelled by hydrocarbon rocket engines. According to this 2010 California study, launching too many of these babies will vomit enough black carbon into the atmosphere to pollute global atmospheric conditions, affecting distribution of ozone and temperature. Worse, solid-state rocket exhaust contains chlorine, an ozone-destroying chemical. How can any government seriously concerned about climate change allow for this?
Third, 5G will potentially threaten natural ecosystems. According to several reports over the last two decades–some of which are summarized here–low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects bird and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship and death. And bee populations suffer from reduced egg-laying abilities of queen bees and smaller colony sizes. More evidence of ecosystem disruption comes from this 2012 meta-study, which indicates that 593 of 919 research studies suggest that RFR adversely affects plants, animals and humans.
It bears repeating: 5G is bad news for all living creatures and the planet we share.

Beware the propaganda deluge

Despite being fully aware of all these unsettling results, threats and concerns, the US corporatocracy continues to maintain a gung-ho attitude about 5G. The Mobile Now Act was passed in 2016, and many US states have since gone ahead with 5G plans. The telecom industry’s biggest players have basically co-opted government powers to enforce their 5G agenda, with companies like AT&T and Qualcomm having begun live testing. And despite research showing serious threats to humans and the planet, the FCC Chairman announced intentions to open low-, mid- and high-frequency spectrums, without even mentioning a single word about the dangers.
They’re going to sell this to us as ‘faster browsing speeds’ – but the truth is, you’ll barely even notice the difference. They’re going to call anyone who protests against 5G a ‘Luddite’ or ‘technophobe’. But why such a willingness to embrace another new technology – even though it carries serious risks and brings spurious benefits? Why not heed the lessons learned from killer products like asbestos, tobacco and leaded gasoline?
Because a tiny percentage of people will gain an awful lot of money, is one reason. And because companies and governments will be given unprecedented amounts of power over civilians is the other.
All isn’t doom and gloom, though. At least one US politician is maintaining some level-headedness: in October, California Governor Jerry Brown stopped legislation that would have allowed the telecom industry to inundate the state with mini-towers. Brown’s bold actions have permitted localities a say in where and how many cell towers are placed.
The state of Hawaii has stopped 5G and smart meters by collectively threatening to charge every person who installed such meters with liability for any health problems residents may suffer. Moreover, 180 scientists have started a petition to warn of 5G potential health effects. Maybe these actions will afford more time for additional studies and data collection. Just as importantly, maybe they’ll cause other politicians and figureheads to reflect on what they’ve been pushing for.
Take action

In the meantime, we as individuals must do everything we can to protect ourselves. Here’s what you can do:
  • Understand EMFs and their behaviours
  • Protect yourself with an EMF Shield to mark and protect you from hotspots. Try a patented product that neutralizes the harmful effects of mobile phones and other EMF emitting devices on humans.
  • Whenever possible, limit your exposure: use an anti-radiation headset or speaker mode while talking on a cellphone.
  • Refuse to use 5G phones and devices. Full stop. And discourage those you know from doing so.
  • Refuse to buy anything ‘smart’ – ‘smart’ appliances, ‘smart’ heaters, etc.
  • Carry shungite crystals to protect from radiation
  • No matter what, do NOT get a smart meter – these put high levels of 5G radiation right in your home
  • Join the growing numbers of dissenters. Get active with them here.
  • Do as the Hawaiians have done and threaten smart meter and 5G tech installers with liability. You can learn how to do that here.
  • Spread the word! Please share this article with everyone you know
Even if the policy drivers and governments aren’t doing their due diligence, at least we can say we’re doing ours.
Sources
http://www.cellphonecancer.com/the-l...5g-technology/
https://www.electricsense.com/12399/...ation-dangers/
http://thehill.com/opinion/technolog...erests-trumped
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...nap-story.html
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/...s-cause-cancer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science...cancer-in-rats
http://www.saferemr.com/2016/05/nati...inds-cell.html
__________________
DISCLAIMER: Reader discretion advised. The above post is entirely fictional, for entertainment purposes only. Any similarities to real life events, animals, humans, persons, politicians, or any other form of organisation entity living, dead or in any other state of existence are coincidental. Any opinion, comment or statements related or attributed to this username are not necessarily nor implied to be those held by the ip/computer/username or other electronic media device or service owner/user.
decim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2019, 07:20 PM   #168
metak88
Senior Member
 
metak88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 232 (150 Posts)
Default

Quote:
20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth



by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.

In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.

As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.

The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]

The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]

5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones

These satellites will use the same type of phased array antennas as will be used by the ground-based 5G systems.

This means that they will send tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth and each device will send a beam of radiation back to the satellite. [2]

Previous generations of RF cellular communication used large antennas to send a blanket of radiation in all directions. The lower frequencies they used and the broad distribution of microwaves limited the numbers of cellular devices that could connect through an individual tall tower.

The much shorter length microwaves used for 5G will make it possible to use small phased array antennas to send and receive signals.

Phased array antennas consist of clusters of hundreds of tiny antennas that work together to shoot a ray of energy at a target just like a bullet. A cluster of these tiny antennas can be arranged in a 4 inch by 4 inch matrix.

The rays of microwaves they produce will be strong enough to pass through walls and human bodies. If they were not strong enough to do this, then everyone with a 5G smartphone would have to stand outside when using the devices. [2]

Each 5G product will also have multiple phased array antennas which will be used to create a powerful beam of radiation back to the 5G devices mounted on electrical utility poles or toward a specific satellite in space.

These beams of radiation will also need to be strong enough to pass through walls and human flesh such as a hand or head to reach the intended destination. [2]

This means that if you are in a crowded location, such as an airport or on a train, there will be hundreds if not thousands of invisible beams of radiation flying through the environment at the speed of light.

As people move in that environment, their bodies will be penetrated by numerous beams of radiation as they walk or as other people walk around them with their 5G smartphones. [2]

5G Phones will be much more Powerful than Previous Phones

The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones.

No one will be free from exposure.

In addition, 5G beams of microwave radiation will be received and transmitted from new computer equipment, household appliances, and automobiles.

Stationary equipment such as Wi-Fi hubs in homes and offices will be permitted to use microwave beams that are 15 times stronger (300 watts) than the signals from 5G phones or 150 times stronger than 4G phones. [2]
Read the rest of the article on their website.
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/200...-entire-earth/
__________________
In rehab...

Last edited by metak88; 08-01-2019 at 07:21 PM.
metak88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2019, 06:27 PM   #169
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Ford vehicles to deploy 5G brain cancer technology in vehicles by 2020, frying your brain while you drive
Wednesday, January 09, 2019 by: Isabelle Z.

Ford has announced that it will deploy cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) technology in all of its new American car models from the year 2022 onward. The technology will enable vehicles to communicate with one another as well as traffic management infrastructure like traffic lights. Pedestrians will also have the ability to transmit their locations to cars, ostensibly boosting the safety of walkers and cyclists.

The car maker claims it will be useful for situations like four-way stops, enabling vehicles to communicate with one another about who has the right of way. It could also be used for vehicles that are involved in accidents to give approaching vehicles advance status of the situation so they can avoid danger. Traffic lights, meanwhile, would be able to send drivers signals to alert them when they are about to turn red or green or to let them know if they are about to run a red light.

In a Medium post announcing the move, Ford Connected Vehicle Platform and Product Executive Director Don Butler expressed Ford’s excitement over the technology, but he failed to mention the huge downside of all of this connectivity.

Butler wrote that the effort’s timing was “perfect” in light of the cellular industry’s push for building 5G networks, but what price will we all pay for this? For all of its greater speeds and connectivity, 5G could put our health at very serious risk.
5G already causing health problems, and many dangers are still unknown

One advocate, Kevin Mottus, has likened 5G’s effects to “microwaving our population,” and hundreds of scientists and doctors share his view.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-...-vehicles.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2019, 11:08 AM   #170
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Even After 5G Court Case Was Won – UK Scientist Facing Jail Time For Warning Public About 5G
BN Frank
January 16, 2019

Since 2017, 241 scientists and doctors from the U.S. and around the world have demanded a moratorium on the installation of 5G wireless technology due to biological and environmental risks.

Activist Post already reported about the 5G court case that was won in Gateshead, England after 5G was installed in street lamps and people became sick. Scientist, Mark Steele, was part of the movement to get the 5G removed and Gateshead council members weren’t at all happy about that.

From Zero5G.com:

Mark Steele, a 5G campaigner, has been highlighting the dangers of a secret 5G rollout by Gateshead Council where residents are complaining of increased illness and Cancer in the affected area. There’s enough evidence to conclude the new smart 5G arrays on the top of new LED lampposts emit Class 1 Radiation frequencies and should be treated as a danger to the Public. Gateshead Council ignorantly rebutted clear evidence and created false allegations on social media posts and printed leaflets stating that Mark Steele is spreading Pseudo Science and that the arrays are not dangerous or 5G:

They misused Police Powers to gag Mark Steele and yesterday he left a free man and Gateshead Council to fork out £11k of taxpayers money to cover the court cost amounting to woeful ignorance. In Court, none of the Council Officers could explain what 5G is; and their leading Government expert refused to attend the Court hearing.

In conclusion, the Judge refused to gag Mark, stating: “The public have a right to know.”

[…]

The Judge declared Mark Steele as a credible expert and engineer on EMF and GSM technologies, which proves Gateshead Council are liable for corruption, misleading the public, making people ill and attempting to discredit Mark Steele and all others such as Smombie Gate fighting 5G rollouts.

Regardless of all of this, Mark now seems to be facing jail time for continuing to warn the public about 5G as well as expecting Gateshead council members to answer questions. So much for democracy…



https://www.activistpost.com/2019/01...-about-5g.html
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2019, 12:01 PM   #171
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Marks explantory video outlining the dangers of 5G:

5G TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINED TO DISPEL THE DENIERS

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2019, 12:45 PM   #172
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Sample 'Municipal Code For Small Cell Infrastructure,' 5G Technology
Catherine Frompovich
1 day ago

By Catherine J. Frompovich

The group I network with, Americans for Responsible Technology regarding 5G, has formulated a “Municipal Code for Small Cell Infrastructure” or the Sample Code for Villages and Towns • Social Media Ideas • Blumenthal & Eshoo • Lobbying Basics, which I share with my readers, and ask you to do the same with your work in the push back against 5G.

The folks at ART graciously have given permission to share and publish the Code, which is found in this 8-page PDF file.

The Introduction to the Code states this:

This document is intended for use by towns and villages that have existing code for cell towers and other wireless communications infrastructure developed and adopted prior to the introduction of “small cell” equipment and its widespread deployment on public rights-of-way. We note that the proposed deployment of small cell infrastructure for 5G will result in the installation of a large number of wireless microwave antennas in every community, many of which could be located in close proximity to homes and apartments, impacting many residents and resulting in much greater citizen concern about placement and negative impact on property values. Moreover, as technology improves, the need for locating antennas in such close proximity to homes and apartments may decline; therefore, municipalities should endeavor to limit, to the extent possible, the deployment of small cells in close proximity to residential dwellings. DISCLAIMER: This draft document is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended to substitute for legal advice regarding zoning regulations or code compliance with local, state or federal law. Americans for Responsibility makes no assurances or guarantees regarding the suitability of this language for any municipality, and shall not be held responsible for any legal action arising from the use of language or concepts contained herein. Local municipalities should be aware that sample ordinances offered by wireless telecommunications companies, their subcontractors or organizations they sponsor are generally not protective of the rights, welfare and property of local municipalities, their homeowners and other residents.




The Code includes:



Section 1: Findings
Section 2: Definitions
Section 3: Permitting and Leasing Process
Section 4: Location and Configuration Preferences
Section 5: Installation Specifications
Section 6: Applicability


This document was produced by Grassroots Communications, 52 Main Street, Port Washington NY 11050. © 2018 Grassroots Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission to copy is hereby granted to municipalities, their elected officials, legal counsel, employees, contractors and residents.

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/51...-5g-technology
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-01-2019, 12:49 PM   #173
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

5G - War on Humanity - The David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2019, 12:30 PM   #174
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

What is 5G except a directed beam of microwaves?

Finally Admitted! "New" Tech Can Beam Voices Directly into Your Head

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2019, 01:22 PM   #175
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

European 5G Conference 2019 Effectively Admits 5G is a Massive Biological Experiment
Date: January 24, 2019Author: Russell Cavanagh
Digital Survivor received a great message of support this morning after yesterday’s Twitter exchange with Comunicare Digitale at the 5G Conference in Brussels.

Yesterday’s post ,”OFFICIAL! Don’t Raise Health Concerns About 5G“, highlighted the glossing over of health concerns regarding 5G technology by podium members at the conference – which was backed by the European Union and the United Nations.

Conference participants were asked if there were serious health problems or consequences due to 5G and those participants informed them that it was “impossible to say” since “the 5G network was not up and running”.

The message this morning came from the Stop 5G Appeal (their associated website is 5gspaceappeal.org).

I reproduce the text below in full, along with two related videos they wanted to be included in this blog post:

I do not know why you should be singled out by Comunicare Digitale and the European Union 5G Conference today. There have been 44 appeals to date from EMF scientists and doctors’ organisations urging the UN, WHO and governments to take the precautionary principle into account and promulgate effective and appropriate regulations governing exposure limits that take into account the known biological effects of electromagnetic radiation and thereby protect the public from the scientifically established devastating effects of EMFs.

They asked the conference participants if there were serious health problems or consequences due to 5G and those participants informed them that it was “impossible to say” since “the 5G network was not up and running”. By their own admission, the conference participants acknowledge that the 5G rollout is the biggest biological experiment in human history, since they plan to measure public exposure levels and health consequences AFTER the rollout. This is illegal under the Nuremberg Code, which forbids experimentation on human beings without informed consent.

This is what the European Parliament stated in its mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010 (2008):
“The European Parliament… [n]otes that the LIMITS ON EXPOSURE to electromagnetic fields which have been set for the general public are OBSOLETE, … obviously take no account of developments in information and communication technologies, of the recommendations issued by the European Environment Agency or of the stricter emission standards adopted, for example, by Belgium, Italy and Austria, and DO NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF VULNERABLE GROUPS, SUCH AS PREGNANT WOMEN, NEWBORN BABIES AND CHILDREN.”

Further, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child says that States shall “undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival and development of the child” (art. 6) and “take appropriate measures to combat disease… taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution” (art. 24(c)). Electromagnetic radiation is one such extremely toxic environmental pollutant and perhaps THE major one.

There are tens of thousands of studies showing the dangerous biological effects of EMFs and you are totally right in questioning the wisdom – indeed the reckless endangerment of human life and the environment – demonstrated by the rollout of 5G, a completely untested new communications technology.

Not only is ground-based 5G a threat to all life on Earth, but the imminent launch of tens of thousands of satellites intended to “blanket” – the word universally used in 5G documentation – the Earth with millimetre waves is a humanitarian crime in the making.

Well done for bringing this to the attention of the public. Those wishing to understand this issue and take action may wish to read the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, available at www.5gspaceappeal.org, and take urgent action to prevent the 5G assault on all life on Earth.
https://digitalsurvivor.uk/2019/01/2...al-experiment/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2019, 07:59 PM   #176
cosmic tramp
Senior Member
 
cosmic tramp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,895
Likes: 2,700 (1,754 Posts)
Default

We. Are. Fucked.

Sorry David, I don't see how opening the heart chakra can absolve any of this. Why don't you at least admit it on your videocasts ? Or would you prefer me to make one ?

BTW to date, 26 of my direct posts to you have gone entirely unanswered - WHY ? Scared David ? Wake up.

Last edited by cosmic tramp; 27-01-2019 at 08:18 PM.
cosmic tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2019, 09:33 PM   #177
serpentine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 1,158 (715 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmic tramp View Post
We. Are. Fucked.

Once radio buffs could twiddle the dials on a cheap radio set up and down the frequencies on different bands and pick up all sorts of stations and weird stuff like continuously transmitted codes.

Now it's mainly white noise and in some cities police communications towers are responsible for the degradation.

Clever thieves are already hacking smart cars parked in owners drives and making off with expensive models in a blink of an eye and once all those 5g towers are installed how long will it take for people to hack them?
serpentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2019, 10:03 PM   #178
thermion
Senior Member
 
thermion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 910 (600 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentine View Post
Once radio buffs could twiddle the dials on a cheap radio set up and down the frequencies on different bands and pick up all sorts of stations and weird stuff like continuously transmitted codes.
Yep. I was oneof those 'buffs'! Lots of fascinating signals from foreign broadcasters, radio amateurs, numbers stations, etc. Many of those are still there, but as you say reception is degraded, but it's mostly due to forcing data down domestic wiring it wan't designed for, unfiltered modern power supplies in things like phone charges, LED lighting, TVs, routers, etc. There are regulations, but who cares?

Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentine View Post
Now it's mainly white noise and in some cities police communications towers are responsible for the degradation.
Fortunately emergency service and military comms are strictly regulated when it comes to out-of-band spurious transmissions, so they don't really cause many interference problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by serpentine View Post
Clever thieves are already hacking smart cars parked in owners drives and making off with expensive models in a blink of an eye and once all those 5g towers are installed how long will it take for people to hack them?
Yes, indeed! As someone who has worked with RF for 40-odd years, I'm not so worried about the health effects of 5G (but let's see the real evidence first), but the absolute nightmare that will unfold when government or criminal hackers get right into The Internet of Things linked by 5G.

How about this as one example from say 10 years from now. Three percent of say UK households own a particular type of electric room heater. These heaters can be controlled by the owners' smart phones from anywhere. The Bad Guys decide to bring down the power grid by hacking into that 5G network and switching these heaters all on at once. That's just one example. Or they switch off all the electric vehicle charging points at night and remove 30 percent of the power grid's load instantly. The power grid is not designed to handle significant instantaneous load changes. It nearly came unstuck during the two-minute Princess Diana silence in 1997 when the power companies significantly under estimated the extent of the reduction in load for that short period.

So it's indirect messing with the power grid by switching millions of things on and off is where I think the real 5G threats lie. If I've worked this out I won't be the only one. Let's hope the Good Guys are working on it...


.

Last edited by thermion; 28-01-2019 at 08:52 AM.
thermion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2019, 09:45 AM   #179
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thermion View Post
Yes, indeed! As someone who has worked with RF for 40-odd years, I'm not so worried about the health effects of 5G (but let's see the real evidence first),.
have you had your sperm count measured?

re the dangers of 5G they are not established which is the whole point: they shouldn't roll something out until they know its safe

its like rolling out cigarettes and then lying about them for decades while the evidence slowly builds and whistleblowers step forward before the truth finally breaks through that they are bad for you

meanwhile how many peoples health was destroyed?

except with cigarettes you have a chose if you want to smoke them. With 5G everyone is bathed in it all the time
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2019, 10:02 AM   #180
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,603
Likes: 13,567 (7,829 Posts)
Default

Cell Phone Radiation Damages Sperm, Studies Show

Among the findings:

-Men who carried a phone in a hip pocket or on the belt had 11 percent fewer mobile sperm than men who kept a phone elsewhere on the body (Kilgallon 2005).
-Men who carried a cell phone on the belt and used it intensively during a five-day test period had a 19 percent drop in highly motile sperm from their previous levels (Davoudi 2002).
-Men who talked on the phone for more than an hour a day had 17 percent fewer highly motile sperm than men who talked less than 15 minutes a day (Fejes 2005).

Laboratory studies on the effects of cell phone radiation on rats, rabbits and other animals have found similar effects on reproductive health (Kesari 2011; Mailankot 2009).

All these studies found statistically significant correlations between cell phone radiation and sperm health, and many found that the adverse changes increased with the amount of radiation exposure. Opinions differ as to the possible mechanism by which cell phone radiation might produce these changes (Falzone 2010).

A number of research papers include unambiguous statements on the potential of cell phone radiation to affect men’s reproductive health:

“Keeping the cell phone in a trouser pocket in talk mode may negatively affect spermatozoa and impair male fertility” (Agarwal 2009).
“Use of cell phones decreases the semen quality in men by decreasing the sperm count, motility, viability and normal morphology. The decrease in sperm parameters was dependent on the duration of daily exposure to cell phones and independent of the initial semen quality” (Agarwal 2008).
“These findings have clear implications for the safety of extensive mobile phone use by males of reproductive age, potentially affecting both their fertility and the health and wellbeing of their offspring” (De Iuliis 2009).
“Overall, these findings raise a number of related health policy and patient management issues that deserve our immediate attention. Specifically, we recommend that men of reproductive age who engage in high levels of mobile phone use do not keep their phones in receiving mode below waist level” (De Iuliis 2009).
“Our results showed that cell phone use negatively affects sperm quality in men… Men with poor sperm quality planning for pregnancy should be advised not to use cell phones extensively” (Gutschi 2011).
“The results show that human spermatozoa exposed to RF-EMR have decreased motility, morphometric abnormalities and increased oxidative stress, whereas men using mobile phones have decreased sperm concentration, motility…, normal morphology, and viability. These abnormalities seem to be directly related with the length of mobile phone use” (La Vignera 2012).

Given the backdrop of increasing infertility rates (Swan 2006), the research findings should be a wake-up call to male cell phone users who are trying to have children or may want to in the future.
https://www.rfsafe.com/10-studies-ce...damages-sperm/
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 29-01-2019 at 10:02 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.