Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Electronic Harassment / Mind Control / Subliminal Programing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18-05-2013, 01:41 AM   #41
abrilliantone
Forum Advisor
 
abrilliantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anti-Soul Mysteries Lab
Posts: 7,427
Likes: 153 (88 Posts)
Default

My question is who is that? Is that just a digital insert put there for a purpose or is that an actual being?
__________________
Quote:
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand."
abrilliantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 01:49 AM   #42
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by limesub79 View Post
well im sure if I showed the picture to my 3 year old son he would just nod and agree with whatever I told him was in the picture! then move on with his life!
That's an excellent point and explains exactly what has happened here, and what was no doubt confidently predicted to happen by those who sanctioned the image, which is why they were emboldened enough to do it.

Like your son, we are being told - through omission - that this is just an innocent portrait of the Queen.

The media never picked up on the existence of the figure in the mirror when these official portraits were first released in 2007; as far as I'm aware nobody publicly questioned the presence of the figure with the Queen prior to sugarray, who first did so on this forum in 2012 - five years after it was released.

Trim back all the extraneous material in this portrait...



And get to the real focus and heart of the photo...



Now if it had been released as an enlarged, cropped image like this, more people would surely have been asking the questions: just who the hell is the second figure in the portrait, and what is the Queen's expression towards that figure intended to convey?

Think about it.

This photo is a classic example of the old "hidden in plain sight" adage.

Since it had to have been officially-approved by the Royal Family before being released to the public, its significance cannot be overstated.

Last edited by size_of_light; 18-05-2013 at 01:35 PM.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:12 AM   #43
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

I will admit, the figure is a strange addition to the photograph, royal photographer's don't tend to make mistakes, but I do think the distorted face is just the bottom of the chandelier.
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:29 AM   #44
abrilliantone
Forum Advisor
 
abrilliantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anti-Soul Mysteries Lab
Posts: 7,427
Likes: 153 (88 Posts)
Default

But wait a minute is that a photo or a painting of a photo?
__________________
Quote:
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand."
abrilliantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:36 AM   #45
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abrilliantone View Post
But wait a minute is that a photo or a painting of a photo?
I don't know, I thought it was a photo but now that you mention it I'm not sure
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:53 AM   #46
abrilliantone
Forum Advisor
 
abrilliantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anti-Soul Mysteries Lab
Posts: 7,427
Likes: 153 (88 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martg View Post
I don't know, I thought it was a photo but now that you mention it I'm not sure

It looks like painting and if that is the case. Then that figure was put there purposely.
__________________
Quote:
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand."
abrilliantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:55 AM   #47
jdeadevil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

Has anyone also noticed the shadow of the other mysterious figure? Just thought I'd put that out there....
__________________
"He who is the cause of someone else becoming powerful, is the agent of his own destruction." ~ Ezio Auditore da Firenze

Last edited by jdeadevil; 18-05-2013 at 02:55 AM.
jdeadevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 02:56 AM   #48
abrilliantone
Forum Advisor
 
abrilliantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anti-Soul Mysteries Lab
Posts: 7,427
Likes: 153 (88 Posts)
Default

Where exactly?
__________________
Quote:
“Any fool can know. The point is to understand."
abrilliantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 03:01 AM   #49
jdeadevil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

Well, am I wrong in thinking the 'figure' is theoretically in the mirror? Because if so there's another mirror just below, where his feet would be.
__________________
"He who is the cause of someone else becoming powerful, is the agent of his own destruction." ~ Ezio Auditore da Firenze
jdeadevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 03:08 AM   #50
susannah1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
What? What are you seeing?


There's a bloke with the Queen while she's having her photo taken.

Either an assistant to the photographer or an assistant to the queen.

And there's a chandelier which obscures the man's head but someone has doodled two black splodges onto so they look like eyes.

That's what I can see because that's what's there.


This is idiotic and embarrassing.
I Agree. I also think that the photographer did this on purpose. Either that or she's not very good.
susannah1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 10:26 AM   #51
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abrilliantone View Post
My question is who is that? Is that just a digital insert put there for a purpose or is that an actual being?
Given Leibovitz's reputation for post production that is "incredibly refined with hours of touching up and digital painting" I'd vote for it being a digital insert or more specifically a digital modification of something physically present at the time like a coat on a clothes dummy strategically placed to appear as a reflection. Perhaps the torso even belongs to Leibovitz herself, deliberately capturing her own image in the mirror as she photographed the Queen, so that her face and hands could then be airbrushed out and morphed into the strange-looking entity in post production.

In the behind the scenes documentary of the photoshoot, the coat Leibovitz is wearing as she takes test photographs of herself with an assistant reflected in one of the palace mirrors does resemble the coat the mysterious figure in the final portrait is wearing...



Quote:
Originally Posted by abrilliantone View Post
But wait a minute is that a photo or a painting of a photo?
Quote:
Originally Posted by martg View Post
I don't know, I thought it was a photo but now that you mention it I'm not sure
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrilliantone View Post
It looks like painting and if that is the case. Then that figure was put there purposely.
Some of the detail in other parts of the photo has that kind of awful, sugary, chocolate box look to it, like it has been heavily filtered and touched up in Photoshop.



So the reflection in the mirror has probably been artificially-rendered to the same degree at least.

Last edited by size_of_light; 18-05-2013 at 10:56 AM.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 11:26 AM   #52
ultimate_warlord
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 4 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by limesub79 View Post
well im sure if I showed the picture to my 3 year old son he would just nod and agree with whatever I told him was in the picture! then move on with his life!

Why do people like you (and there are many here) join this forum to flash off their dumbness? Or do you get a wage packet from Professional Naysayers and Debunkers Agency?

You too should move on with your life if you can`t see what "size of light" and everybody else is seeing. The photo is deliberate. The queen knows something`s behind her shoulder. She wants us to know. That alone is the end of story. This photo was not about the queen, but about the enigmatic figure.
I´m not saying it`s a shapeshifting reptilian from Orion...I´m saying the queen and company blatantly want us to think so.
ultimate_warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 11:30 AM   #53
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultimate_warlord View Post
The photo is deliberate. The queen knows something`s behind her shoulder. She wants us to know. That alone is the end of story. This photo was not about the queen, but about the enigmatic figure.

I´m not saying it`s a shapeshifting reptilian from Orion...I´m saying the queen and company blatantly want us to think so.
Couldn't have said it better.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 11:33 AM   #54
truthspoon
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Africa........ The pirate-coast! Yarrh!
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 278 (169 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultimate_warlord View Post
You too should move on with your life if you can`t see what "size of light" and everybody else is seeing. The photo is deliberate. The queen knows something`s behind her shoulder..

Dude, the person is the dark suit is not an alien with a chandelier for a face.

It's a person who is part of the photographer's entourage.

I know you've got 'previous' on here for posting disinformation and supporting laughable bullshit to make the movement look stupid, but come on, keep within your operating parameters and don't attack people personally for giving their opinions huh?


Here, this is a video of the photoshoot. There are no aliens anywhere.


But there is a long haired chap with the same dark suit on.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meTECfGfoMI

Last edited by truthspoon; 18-05-2013 at 11:39 AM.
truthspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 12:00 PM   #55
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
Dude, the person is the dark suit is not an alien with a chandelier for a face.

It's a person who is part of the photographer's entourage.
At least other doubters have had the good sense to suggest (albeit mistakenly) that it is a chandelier face.

But you're striking off on your own, I see, and claiming it's just a normal fella.

Lets see what you've got...

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
Here, this is a video of the photoshoot. There are no aliens anywhere.


But there is a long haired chap with the same dark suit on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meTECfGfoMI
I can only assume you mean this guy...




Hilarious.





The resemblance is uncanny.





When did he change the colour of his shirt?

Last edited by size_of_light; 19-05-2013 at 12:53 AM.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 12:05 PM   #56
ultimate_warlord
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 4 (2 Posts)
Default

Three weeks planning by the crème de la crème of the photography universe. A most meticulous paranoically pedantic perfectionist with a team of aces, then publicly exhibits a photo with the most hilarious blooper in history by including herself in the photo while the reflection conveniently ultra-reflects to overlap and replace her head with a reptilian entity head.
YEAH...RIGHT !
Will she ever get another job?
I´m LMFAO at skeptics. I truly am.

Last edited by ultimate_warlord; 18-05-2013 at 12:09 PM.
ultimate_warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 12:20 PM   #57
truthspoon
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Africa........ The pirate-coast! Yarrh!
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 278 (169 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by size_of_light View Post

When did he change the colour of his shirt?
Actually it's more likely a woman. Look at the video at 25 seconds. There is a female assistant with her hair tied back wearing the same dark suit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meTECfGfoMI


There's certainly no aliens anywhere though.

Last edited by truthspoon; 18-05-2013 at 12:20 PM.
truthspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 12:42 PM   #58
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edelweiss pirate View Post
Actually it's more likely a woman. Look at the video at 25 seconds. There is a female assistant with her hair tied back wearing the same dark suit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meTECfGfoMI
Ah, I see, so now it's "actually more likely a woman" meaning your first ridiculous explanation that it was a fella with the wrong-coloured shirt blew up in your face, and now you've just spotted someone else wearing a dark coloured shirt and it's suddenly definitely her.



I've already speculated on Annie Leibovitz's dark suit being the basis of the figure in the mirror, so adding this woman as a second possibility makes no difference.

Do you even understand what's being discussed here?

Quote:
There's certainly no aliens anywhere though.
You keep repeating the 'alien' line despite nobody on this thread having claimed there are aliens present at the photoshoot, which indicates you have some kind of irrational fear of'aliens' and are projecting it onto this thread.

Best stop clogging it up with your personal issues, huh?

Last edited by size_of_light; 18-05-2013 at 12:42 PM.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 01:10 PM   #59
size_of_light
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,627
Likes: 595 (370 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdeadevil View Post
Has anyone also noticed the shadow of the other mysterious figure? Just thought I'd put that out there....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdeadevil View Post
Well, am I wrong in thinking the 'figure' is theoretically in the mirror? Because if so there's another mirror just below, where his feet would be.
There is a second unseen figure standing at the right, just beyond the range of the mirror.

It's difficult to tell due to the distorting angle of the bottom mirror, but I'm thinking the legs might correspond as shown...


Last edited by size_of_light; 18-05-2013 at 01:11 PM.
size_of_light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2013, 01:38 PM   #60
truthspoon
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Africa........ The pirate-coast! Yarrh!
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 278 (169 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by size_of_light View Post
There is a second unseen figure standing at the right, just beyond the range of the mirror.
Of course there is. The room's full of Annie Leibovitz's assistants.

Last edited by truthspoon; 18-05-2013 at 01:39 PM.
truthspoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.