Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > New World Order / Global Government

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23-05-2018, 05:28 PM   #301
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default



Labour suspends male activist who stood as women's officer 'because he identifies as a woman on Wednesdays'

David Lewis is on the list as a candidate women's officer for his Constituency Labour Party in Basingstoke
Helena Horton
22 May 2018 • 2:21pm

A local Labour party has suspended a man who previously made it onto the list of candidates for women's officer because he "identifies as a woman on Wednesdays", under their "self-id" rules.

In order to stand for the women-only position, the candidate has to self-identify as a woman, but there are no other stipulations about gender.

David Lewis, a Labour activist, told the Spectator he identifies as a woman "on Wednesdays, between 6.50am when my alarm goes off and around midnight when I go to bed."

Some feminist activists have raised concerns about self-identification, arguing it could cause men to stand on the all-women shortlists the Labour uses to improve gender equality. They have tried to bring a legal challenge against the party, saying where transgender women do not hold a gender recognition certificate, they should not be allowed to stand in posts the law reserves for women.

Mr Lewis said he stood as candidate to: "inform the CLP, and maybe some other people, about what this policy means, about what happens when you say that someone’s gender depends only on what they say and nothing else."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...er-identifies/
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2018, 05:39 PM   #302
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Straight White Male – How the elite hide amongst the sea of SWMs
Regicide
8 hours ago



By Regicide

Online media outlets have recently reported that a comedian Josh Denny has faced a Twitter storm of criticism for comparing the label ‘straight white male’ with the ‘n’ word. Josh believes that the SWM term is used to offend and diminish those that could be assumed to fall under the label.

Identity politics has become one of the biggest movements and influencers of society in the 21st century. Many people today feel compelled, even obliged to become an activist for some identify category or ‘box’. LGBT+, BAME, Feminism, Environmentalist, Veganism, there is an angry and oppressed community just ready and waiting to recruit you into their ranks. However, once the recruits have stood in line under their chosen flag, what’s left? With the power of elimination, we have now found a new ‘identity’. The Straight White Male. Unlike many of the other identities, this group are held up as the perpetrators, villainised with abusing their ‘privileges’ and suppressing all others. A common enemy is born. And it’s a big one, as the SWM make up the vast majority of the population in the western world, sharing that status only with straight white females, who conversely are not considered perpetrators but in fact victims of the SWM.

This attempt to create another category in identify politics does have some significant flaws. Not least the fact that the vast majority of those who would fit the bill for SWM in no way relate to it. There is no common ‘brotherhood’ amongst the SWM community. There is no insidious secret collaborative conspiracy against all other identities. Most people who could be considered SWM are left confused, turning out their pockets and looking under the couches for this apparent ‘privilege’ that they either didn’t know they benefited from or have now assumed they’ve lost somewhere?

It is true to stay that historically and in present times, the vast majority of perpetrators that have oppressed others, committed heinous abuses and are guilty of the accusations from the other identities, have been overwhelmingly straight white males. But these SWMs have one very distinctive difference. They are members of the elite. Your average every day, common SWM is more likely to have been subjected to those same appalling behaviours or an unwitting accomplice either by accidental association or abusive threats and coercion. History shows that the common SWM has been subjected to slavery, feudal oppression, extreme violence and mass murder, economic abuse and misplacement, unjust persecution and imprisonment and total oppression of basic human rights. All at the hands of their ‘brothers’ from the elite SWM. It’s also true to say that the common SWM has stood side by side those from other identities who have fought for their freedoms and rights.

It is dangerous to attempt to group a large number of innocent and unwitting people into the same category of the perpetrator, based solely on sharing a similar appearance, gender or background. Not all Germans were Nazi’s, most Muslims are not terrorists and most SWMs are not abusive, oppressive perpetrators. Not only does it give rise to yet further discrimination and abuse that is surely not needed in this world, it actually provides a mass identity for which the elite SWM perpetrator can hide amongst in plain sight. Similar to the Netflix series ‘Money Heist’, the perpetrators can blend perfectly amongst their innocent and unwitting victims by merely wearing the same clothes and masks until no one can tell which is which?

We come back to the most pertinent question, who benefits? Who benefits from creating another divisive category? Who benefits from the diversion of having various identities seething and pointing fingers at the common SWM? The reality is that the SWM sub-group simply doesn’t exist and has become nothing more than a convenient distraction from the truth. It is not about race, gender or sexuality. It is about money and power, it always has been. The elite v everyone else. The 1% is the only identity we should be the most concerned with. Don’t fall for it.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/47...ongst-sea-swms
Likes: (1)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2018, 05:33 PM   #303
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Grenfell tower is an example of marxist technocratic state-socialist architecture known as 'brutalism'

Now we find that neo-marxist and ex JP morgan banker Tony Blair was partially responsible for the factors leading upto the disaster at grenfell

Blair was the PM of the 'labour' party who also supported the technocratic city planning vision of the 1960's marxist town planners who built towers like grenfell

TWO HOURS to evacuate Grenfell residents, revealed

The London Fire Brigade's response to Grenfell Tower fire had 'several blunders'
Biggest error was failure to order full evacuation for hours after the blaze started
Expose found emergency calls were diverted to Stratford, Kent and Newcastle
By Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail and Sebastian Murphy-bates For Mailonline
Published: 22:23, 30 May 2018 | Updated: 10:27, 31 May 2018

Tony Blair and deregulation:

Before Blair became prime minister, the home secretary had to approve to closure of any fire station in the country.

But New Labour's adoption of Thatcher-inspired deregulation to appeal to a new kind of voter extended to fire-fighting services. Under Blair, 'half the fire cover within four miles of Grenfell Tower' vanished in five years, writes O'Hagan.

The loose attitude to closures meant the number of experienced firefighters available in the capital was constantly under threat and has been ever since.

Labour's deregulation also made it easier for big players in the construction industry to 'flout regulations and fake tests and call it normal practice'. At this stage, O'Hagan argues, 'the marketing of insulation products is notably misleading and contractors are known to use combinations of products that have not been tested together'.

It is these kinds of safety failures that are believed to have been behind the fire at Grenfell Tower.

Cladding companies' lethal product

Rydon's Celotex RS5000 insulation and Reynobond cladding was covered in aluminium. Its core was polyethylene and there was a 50mm gap between the insulation and cladding.

This combination - used across hundreds of towers in the UK - required testing before being placed on said buildings.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz5H6Nkam9O
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 04:08 PM   #304
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Who is the Labour Party’s “witchfinder general”?
Asa Winstanley Activism and BDS Beat
31 May 2018

Veteran anti-racist, former mayor of London and Labour giant Ken Livingstone resigned in May from the party to which he had devoted his adult life.

But the very same day, another high-profile leftist purged from Labour put the party on notice he would be taking his case to the high court.

Marc Wadsworth’s case highlights how the party’s disciplinary apparatus is being used to purge members falsely accused of anti-Semitism, many of them supporters of Palestinian rights.

Wadsworth announced at a meeting in Bristol that his lawyer had written to General Secretary Jennie Formby giving Labour two weeks to re-admit him or expect a legal challenge to his expulsion.

The letter came as Wadsworth was on a national speaking tour calling for his reinstatement.

After the expulsion of Wadsworth in April, it became clear to many activists that Livingstone had little chance of receiving a fair hearing.

So in May, after two years of suspension over supposed anti-Semitism, Livingstone said the controversy over his continuing membership had become a “distraction” to getting the party led by Jeremy Corbyn back into government.

Livingstone said that had he fought expulsion, his case would have dragged on “for months or even years, distracting attention from Jeremy’s policies.”

Corbyn himself said it was a sad moment but it was the “right thing to do”.
read on here https://electronicintifada.net/blogs...88f1-299185473
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2018, 06:11 PM   #305
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Socialism Equals Triumph for Corporate Criminals
By Jon Rappoport
8 hours ago

In several recent articles (all here under category: socialism), I’ve exposed the myth that socialism is a revolution of and for the people.

I’ve presented evidence that socialism is actually a movement owned, operated, and funded by ultra-wealthy elites.

Dupes, foot soldiers, blind idealists, indoctrinated students, and low-level thugs are recruited through cutouts to serve the agenda of Rockefeller Globalists, for example, who are determined to bring about worldwide socialism.

Socialism, in a nutshell, equals ultra-rich elites (represented by the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, etc.) owning the free market, cutting out competition, and creating more powerful, overarching, central governments.

Hidden in the plan is the granting of greater dominion to mega-corporations. This is a key fact.

The US Constitution was a document that established extremely limited central government. Regardless of the motives of the authors and the state legislatures that ratified it, the ideas contained in the Constitution were, and are, extremely oppressive toward large centralized structures controlling the people.

But there was another factor present at the beginning of the American Republic.

At the dawn of the United States, corporations were chartered and thus allowed to operate by the individual states. If a corporation, in the eyes of a state legislature, violated a basic trust by harming the people, committing offenses against the citizenry, the legislature could summarily cancel their charter and literally exile them from the state.

This power followed, in part, from the fact that corporations were not and are not individuals. They do not have the rights and freedoms of individuals. Corporations were not granted the rights of citizens in the Constitution.

Richard Grossman, an activist and scholar of US corporate history, unearthed and made lucid these facts.

At the birth of the American Republic, therefore, there was a double limitation on power. Central government and corporations were both strapped and shackled.

Of course, just as the federal government has been allowed to expand like an unchecked fungus, so has corporate power.

Under socialism (aka Globalism), mega-corporate power is the prow of a ship that sails on and on and conquers the economies of the world.

Corporate crimes go unpunished.

Contrary to popular belief, the real agenda of socialism has nothing to do with prosecuting those crimes.

The idea, for example, that greater socialism in America would defeat Monsanto is ludicrous in the extreme.

Monsanto is one of the components of actual socialism—the real, not the fake, version.

Again, socialism is by, for, and of the ultra-wealthy elites. It is not a movement on behalf of the downtrodden.

As Gary Allen puts it in his 1971 classic, None Dare call It Conspiracy: “…pressure from above and pressure from below… The pressure from above comes from secret, ostensibly respectable Comrades in the government and [elite Globalist] Establishment, forming, with the radicalized mobs in the streets below, a giant pincer around middle-class society. The street rioters are pawns, shills, puppets, and dupes for an oligarchy of elitist conspirators working above to turn America’s limited government into an unlimited government with total control over our lives and property.”

“The American middle class is being squeezed to death by a vise. In the streets we have avowed revolutionary groups… Virtually all members of these groups sincerely believe that they are fighting the Establishment. In reality they are an indispensable ally of the Establishment in fastening Socialism on all of us. The naive radicals think that under Socialism the ‘people’ will run everything. Actually, it will be a clique of Insiders in total control, consolidating and controlling all wealth. That is why these schoolboy Lenins and teenage Trotskys are allowed to roam free and are practically never arrested or prosecuted. They are protected. If the Establishment wanted the revolutionaries stopped, how long do you think they would be tolerated?”

Gary Allen wrote that passage in 1971. Does it ring a familiar bell now?

As philosopher George Santayana famously wrote in 1905, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Equally famous is the prescription for all advertising: repeat the same message over and over, so it sinks into the mind and forms a false impression of truth.

Thus it has been with the basic message of socialism. “This is a form of government that finally serves the people. It is the people rising up to take the reins of power.”

Once that notion is rigidly fixed in consciousness, it is impossible to believe socialism is actually emanating from the elite of the elite.

Fortunately, more and more people are waking up to the basic con of fake news, which doesn’t only broadcast distorted current events spooling out through screens, day by day.

Basic themes of fake news also span decades and even centuries.

What will happen when enough young people, who want to tear down the structures of the monopolists, realize those same men are bankrolling them in the streets?

What will happen when these young people realize their teachers and mentors and handlers and professors have been feeding them the precise reverse of the truth?

As long as independent media continue to proliferate, that day is coming.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/47...rate-criminals
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 07:49 PM   #306
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Brexit BETRAYAL: Jacob Rees-Mogg demands Labour answer to Leave voters after SHOCK U–TURN
LABOUR was accused of betraying Brexit voters last night after senior figures pledged to fight to keep Britain tied to the EU's single market. In a fresh policy u-turn ahead of next week’s crunch Commons votes on Theresa May's Brexit plans, Labour frontbenchers yesterday tabled a string of amendments to the Government's flagship departure legislation designed to keep Britain closely linked to Brussels.
By Macer Hall
PUBLISHED: 00:00, Wed, Jun 6, 2018 | UPDATED: 14:01, Wed, Jun 6, 2018

Labour sources said the amendments to the Government's EU (Withdrawal) Bill were drafted to try to make the country "adopt the Norway model" of EU membership.

But leading Brexit supporters last night rubbished the move as a fresh attempt to keep Britain tied to Brussels forever.

Senior Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, the chairman of the backbench European Research Group, said the Labour proposals would turn the UK into a "vassal state" forced to accept rules from Brussels without a voice in determining EU policy.

"The Norway model is the vassal state, not Brexit, and the Labour Party will need to answer to its many leave voters," Mr Rees-Mogg said.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/96...r-SHOCK-U-TURN
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-08-2018, 10:12 AM   #307
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Man up jeremy and stop purging the party of anyone who is telling the truth about jewish influence

The ongoing attempt by the jewish community on britain to subvert british politics (see also the dispatches episode on the jewish lobbys activities in britain as well as the coordinated effort by several jewish newspapers in britain to damage the political career of jeremy corbyn)

Former Labour MP Jim Sheridan suspended following remarks about Jewish community
Jim Sheridan faces disciplinary action, as an Israeli athlete who survived the Munich massacre accuses Jeremy Corbyn of antisemitism

Adam Forrest
@adamtomforrest
23 hours ago


Fury vs Wilder confirmed following win as Frampton beats Jackson
Trump's top White House lawyer 'cooperating with Mueller probe'
Former Conservative MP Sir Peter Tapsell dies, aged 88

Labour has suspended councillor and former MP Jim Sheridan over comments he made about the party’s antisemitism row.

Mr Sherdian, MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire North until 2015, said he had lost “respect and empathy” for the Jewish community over the ongoing antisemitism row in the Labour Party.

“For almost all my adult life I have had the utmost respect and empathy for the Jewish community and their historic suffering,” he wrote on his Facebook page, in a post which has since been removed.

“No longer due to what they and their blairite plotters are doing to my party and the long suffering people of Britain who need a radical labour government.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8497201.html
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 05:14 PM   #308
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

when wasn't it? come on folks...catch up....

Is UK Labour now Zionist-occupied territory?
3rd September 2018

By Stuart Littlewood

The National Executive Committee of the Labour Party will vote on Tuesday 4 September on whether to bow to the bullies and adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism even though it has been roundly criticised by legal experts as unworkable. If they do, it will be hailed as a mighty victory for the dark forces behind the pro-Israel lobby in their bid to shut down criticisim of that racist state.

More than two years ago Gilad Atzmon was viewing the Labour Party’s crazed witch hunt for “anti-Semites” with misgiving. He declared, in his usual robust way, that Labour under Jeremy Corbyn was not so much a party as a piece of Zionist-occupied territory.

Writing in his blog about Corbyn and [Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer] John McDonnell’s servile commitment to expel anyone whose remarks might be interpreted by the Zionist tendency as hateful or simply upsetting to Jews, he concluded:

Corbyn’s Labour is now unequivocally a spineless club of Sabbos Goyim [which I take to mean non-Jewish dogsbodies]. The Labour Party’s policies are now compatible with Jewish culture: intolerant to the core and concerned primarily with the imaginary suffering of one people only. These people are not the working class, they are probably the most privileged ethnic group in Britain…. I did not anticipate that Corbyn would become a Zionist lapdog. Corbyn was a great hope to many of us. I guess that the time has come to accept that The left is a dead concept; it has nothing to offer.

Amen to that last bit.

And more recently Miko Peled, former Israeli soldier and the son of an Israeli general, warned that Israel was going to “pull all the stops, they are going to smear, they are going to try anything they can to stop Corbyn” and the reason anti-Semitism is used is because they have no other argument.
“Imprecise, confusing and open to misinterpretation and even manipulation”

Since then we’ve had a queue of high profile Labourites and others sticking the knife into Corbyn. Last week it was the former Chief Rabbi and Zionist extremist Jonathan Sacks. Then the much-respected MP Frank Field, a maverick who finally quit Labour in noisy fashion giving anti-Semitism as a reason but having grumbled for a long time about a culture of intolerance, nastiness and intimidation within the party. Yesterday we had to suffer ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown mouthing off about how the IHRA definition “is something we should support unanimously, unequivocally and immediately”. He urged Corbyn to remove the “stain” of prejudice from Labour by writing the definition and all of its examples into the party’s new code of conduct.

read on here
https://www.redressonline.com/2018/0...ied-territory/
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 05:17 PM   #309
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

when is the left going to adopt the anti-whiteism definition?

when will it become against the law to speak of a global conspiracy by non jewish white people? oh that's right NEVER because they clearly don't control things enough to do that....

4th September, 2018
NEC adopts full IHRA antisemitism definition plus “statement”
Sienna Rodgers

Labour’s ruling body has adopted the full International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism – including all 11 examples – plus a “statement” clarifying that freedom of speech on Israel will not be restricted.

However, a binding vote has been delayed until after Labour conference later this month, following further consultation with Jewish groups and stakeholders and after nine newly elected NEC members take up their places.

At a crunch meeting this afternoon, members of the party’s national executive committee (NEC) agreed to adopt all the IHRA examples – including the most controversial regarding the description of “a state of Israel” as a “racist endeavour” – in its code of conduct.

Jeremy Corbyn, who attended the meeting, reportedly suggested a clarifying statement that included the sentence: “It cannot be considered racist to treat Israel like any other state or assess its conduct against the standards of international law.”

Rare defeat for @jeremycorbyn at NEC. He wanted attached personal statement by him to be endorsed by NEC as clarification of IHRA definition of antisemitism. He withdrew statement when clear NEC would not accept it pic.twitter.com/k74Ky7KoAE

— Robert Peston (@Peston) September 4, 2018

However, the Labour leader’s suggestion was not formally moved after discussion was held amongst NEC members. The ruling body is understood to have been divided over whether to issue an accompanying statement at all – and split over Corbyn’s proposal, which was deemed by some to be too strong.

According to ITV’s Robert Peston, Labour’s antisemitism working group instead put forward the following statement, which was agreed by the NEC: “We recommend that we adopt the IHRA in full with all examples. This does not in any way undermine the freedom of expression on Israel or the rights of Palestinians. We re-invite the organisations to re-engage in consultation on the Code of Conduct.” LabourList understands that this statement is not included within the code itself, but issued separately.
https://labourlist.org/2018/09/nec-a...lus-statement/

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 05-09-2018 at 05:19 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 05:20 PM   #310
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Why we must say no to 'old' New Labour
By John Brindley
1 day ago
Political Manipulation UK News Guest Content

The Government is in a continual crisis over Brexit with Theresa May still clinging onto office by her fingertips whilst the Labour Party is engaged in an act of self-destruction over largely ludicrous anti Semitism allegations….

The answer to this Punch and Judy show in which both sides appear to be losing the plot appears to be obvious – we need a credible ‘third way’, a sensible centre party.

But haven’t we been here before and weren’t the results even worse than the mess which preceded it?

My fear is that the same dark forces that are manipulating and encouraging the dramas facing both main establishment parties are the ones who will try to fill the vacuum.

Problem – reaction – solution?

Problem – neither main party seems to be in a position to go forward and truly lead the country in this time of confusion and transition.

Reaction – there must be an alternative somewhere?

Solution – the same dark suits that have contributed hugely to the mess we now find ourselves at home and abroad, put on a new set of clothes and take the reigns again.

It’s happened at least twice before in modern times – but this, believe me, would be third time very unlucky for the future of Britain.

In 1981 four establishment politicians Bill Rodgers, David Owen, Shirley Williams and Roy Jenkins – none of whom were very social or democratic - formed the Social Democratic Party.

The idea was to profit from Labour’s commitment to nuclear disarmament, wishing to withdraw from the European Economic Community and being too left wing. Sounds familiar?

The problem was the ‘Democrats’ discovered to their angst there is no democracy in our country.

For, although their partnership with the Liberals led them to more than 25 per cent of the vote at the 1983 General Election, they won a paltry 23 seats.

The vacuum fillers were far more successful a decade later when officially the revolution came from within.

New Labour, a title rejected by the gang of four, was a label rather than a new party – but bore no resemblance to the Labour Party under John Smith, who conveniently for Blair died of a ‘heart attack’ in 1994.

So Tony Blair and co occupied the so-called middle ground between the far right of the post Thatcher Tories and Smith’s left wing Labour and led Britain to become one of the most widely hated countries in the world thanks to his illegal invasion of Iraq.

Don’t say you haven’t been warned. The very same could happen again.

What we know so far – officially – is that meetings have been held and would-be benefactors recruited.

Reports have linked Tony Blair’s son Euan with the new movement. Any involvement from the old war criminal himself has been strongly denied but when did we last believe a word he said?

Once again, the conspirators have the same reasons to want to change Britain’s direction.

Firstly they know our war machine is stalling under the Tories as the superior intelligence of Vladimir Putin defies attempts to flan the flames in Syria and that a much more peaceful foreign policy is likely should current Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn survive the night of the long knives and come to power.

There’s the thorny issue of Brexit. Note the voices that have called for a second referendum and you could well imagine them joining forces in a new party to once again defy the wishes of the electorate.

And, finally, God forbid we ever become too left wing.

Socialist leaders – Hugh Gaitskell, Harold Wilson, John Smith et al – usually get either poisoned, bullied out of office or murdered.

Now they are doing all they can to drive Corbyn into oblivion

Anything to ensure the establishment doesn’t lose its grip on power and wealth.

The irony is we desperately need a new kind of politics – an escape from the pathetic self-destructive theatre and back stabbing that has turned so many people off from being remotely interested.

But that change must not be the wolf Blair and his henchmen Peter Mandelson, Ed Balls, Chuka Umunna and co returning in a different guise.

That really would signal the death knoll for democracy in this country……
https://www.davidicke.com/article/49...old-new-labour
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 08:42 PM   #311
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Left or Liberal?

Likes: (2)
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2018, 10:13 PM   #312
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Contradiction in the left

Isn't it fascinating to watch as people in the left who are trying to pretend that they are not communists tell us that multiculturalism and mass immigration are vital while they simultaneously campaign to prevent any criticism of the jewish state of israel which resists multiculturalism and mass immigration

here is trump funder and arch zionist sheldon adelson saying that 'assimilation is killing the jews'

wow so assmilition kills the jews but it is ok in predominantly white countries? explain to me sheldon that if you say that about jews then what does it do to whites then?

Sheldon Adelson - "Assimilation Is Killing Us [Jews]"



And get a load of these two guyys saying that immigration into white majority countries is their top priority while saying in the same breath that maintaining israels jewish identity is vital. How do pro-mass immigration people on the left not see how they are being played?



And here we have an article explaining how one minute people on the left were saying that people could critiicise israel and then the next minute they were pushing hard to ensure that criticism of israel was included in the definition of anti-semitism!

so explain to me why leftists that argue that there should be no borders for european countries can at the same time say that israel must be protected?

It looks like the commies are against all nation states except israel

How Israel’s bogus definition of anti-Semitism shuts down free speech
Steven Garside The Electronic Intifada 12 September 2018

One of the most insidious tactics employed by Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) and the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM) - the two organised vocal Zionist campaign groups inside the Labour party - has been to claim it is an innocuous and uncontroversial document.

It is, in the words of John Mann, a Labour parliamentarian and arch critic of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a “very mundane, humdrum definition of anti-Semitism that left [wing] parties across the world have been happy to accept along with everyone else.” It would have no impact on the right to campaign for Palestinians, Mann has maintained as, after all, the IHRA “has got absolutely nothing to do with the rights of Palestinians … It’s got to do with abuse, attacks and racism against Jewish people.”

This lie has been repeated time and again. Labour Friends of Israel MP Jess Phillips – who once infamously laughed about “stabbing” Corbyn “in the front” – also flippantly waved away any free speech concerns before the crucial NEC vote:

“I want the IHRA adopted in full. I think the current Israeli government are racist [sic] who are currently doing all they can at home and with their allies in the US to isolate and cripple Palestinian lives to the point of both hopelessness and retaliation. Look how easy that was.”

Influential pro-Israel commentators in the mainstream media have been happy to peddle this dishonesty. The Guardian’s Jonathan Freedland said the charge that “the IHRA conflates legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism … makes plenty of Jews want to slam their heads on their desks in frustration.” You can, he argued, “if you want, say everything the state of Israel has done since its birth has been racist.”
Against free speech

Suddenly, things have changed. The decision of the NEC to adopt the IHRA definition and examples in full on 4 September while at the same time issuing a statement claiming that those examples will not stop criticism of Israel has brought howls of outrage from the Jewish Labour Movement and Labour Friends of Israel and their supporters.

First out of the block, cautiously, was Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP who reserves for herself the free speech right to call her elected leader a “fucking racist and anti-Semite” without providing any evidence. The free speech clarification was, she said, “an unnecessary qualification” that would only “dilute” the adoption of the IHRA examples. It was “two steps forward and one step back.”

More stridently, Simon Johnson, the Jewish Leadership Council’s chief executive, said the free speech caveat “drives a coach and horses” through the IHRA definition. Labour Friends of Israel director Jennifer Gerber also waded in, calling the NEC’s free speech clarification an “appalling” measure which “totally undermines the other examples the party has supposedly just adopted.”

They Jewish Leadership Council and Labour Friends of Israel are of course right for once. The IHRA and free speech are – contrary to the pre-vote dishonesty of the Corbyn haters – completely incompatible. This much has long been established by independent legal experts and affirmed by the cross-party House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee which looked at the issue in 2016.

This stunning about-turn on the compatibility of free speech and the IHRA would be amusing if it was not so offensive to the intellect. The IHRA clearly attempts to police the discursive boundaries of the Israel-Palestinian conflict in a way which places core, foundational issues off-limits.

For sure, under it one can still criticize elements of Israeli government policy and actions. What one cannot do is identify Israel as a racist, settler-colonial project, the original sin of which was to ethnically cleanse the indigenous population of Palestine.
https://electronicintifada.net/conte...a1bc-299185473

it does more than that...it prevents anyone suggesting that zionism and communism are two masks on the same face

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 12-09-2018 at 10:15 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-09-2018, 01:44 PM   #313
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Revolving Door: Dozens of Clinton Staffers Hired by Google — and Vice-Versa
By Charlie Nash
13 Sep 20181697
Dozens of people who used to work for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and a number of Clinton initiatives went on to work at Google, and vice-versa.

At least twelve employees from the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clinton Foundation, and the Clinton Health Access Initiative went on to work for Google, while at least fifteen Google employees went on to work for Hillary For America. The list was originally developed by Adam Townsend on Twitter.

Pls look at thread and behold #Google “we’re the good, evil company” This list is employees of Google & Groundworks (goog co built to help HRC elex) that have been swapped in/out of Dept of State/ #Clinton Foundation/ #Hillary Prez campaign/New America (dem org)

— Adam Townsend (@adamscrabble) April 28, 2018

Here is the list of employees:

Peter Albers, former Finance and Operations Director at the Clinton Foundation, before moving to Google Fiber as Head of Partnerships and Market Development in 2015. In 2017, he became Google’s Global Head of Business Development and Head of Americas Retail Partnerships for Google Play Retail.

Shannon Jones Newberry, former Deputy Director of Communications at the Clinton Global Initiative, before becoming Communications and Public Affairs Manager at Google in 2012.

Jeff Lawi, a former analyst at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, before joining Google in 2013 where he has held a number of positions, including Product Support Manager, Senior Product Support Manager, and Principal, Strategy, and Business Operations.

Nathan Allen, a former consultant at the Clinton Foundation, before becoming a Senior Creative Producer and Launch Manager at Google in 2015. Allen is currently an Executive Producer at Google.

Puiyan Leung, a former consultant for the Clinton Foundation through Stern Consulting Corps. Leung had been an intern at Google before serving as a consultant for the Clinton Foundation, and he returned to Google in 2013 as a financial analyst, before becoming a program manager in 2015. Leung left Google to work for Facebook in 2016.

Felicia Yep Salinas, former Employment and Labor Commitment Maker at the Clinton Global Initiative before joining Google in 2015 as a Talent Hacker. She then became a Technical Sourcer in 2016, before moving to Facebook months later.

John Lyman, according to the website for GV where he now works, “helped launch the Clinton Global Initiative,” worked as Deputy Chairperson, and focused on “progressive policy and advocacy,” before joining Google for “a decade” where he served as Head of Partnerships and Marketing for Google for Entrepreneurs.

Scot Frank, a former mentor at the Clinton Global Initiative, joined Google as a product manager in 2014.

Theodore Przybyla, former Working Group Manager at the Clinton Global Initiative, joined Google as an engagement manager in 2015, before leaving for the Brookings Institution in September 2017.

Justin Pang, former Deputy Chief Operating Officer at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, joined Google in 2012. Having served as Strategic Partner Lead of Global Partnerships and Team Lead of Global Partnerships, he is currently the Head of Partnerships.

Maria Wang-Faulkner, former Country Support Manager at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, joined Google as a Strategic Partner Manager in 2016, and currently serves as Strategic Partner Development Manager for Google Assistant.

Paul Lee, a former consultant for the Clinton Foundation, joined Google in 2007 as a Senior Product Manager, before leaving in 2015.

Stephanie Hannon, former Group Product Manager at Google, left the company in 2011 before becoming a Product Manager at Facebook in 2012. Hannon then moved back to Google in 2013 as a Director of Product Management for just over two years, before she became the Chief Technology Officer for Hillary For America in April 2015.

Osi Imeokparia, former Product Management Director at Google, left the company in 2015 to become Chief Product Officer at Hillary For America. Imeokparia currently works at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which is owned by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Derek Parham, former Technical Lead of Google Apps, joined Hillary For America in 2016 as Deputy Chief Technology Officer.

Jason Rosenbaum has worked in a number of Democrat Party-affiliated positions, including as Deputy Director of Online Communications for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee between April 2007 and March 2009, and Digital Director for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee between March 2009 and June 2013. Rosenbaum then became Director of Elections and Advocacy at Google in July 2013, before leaving to become Director of Digital Advertising at Hillary For America in July 2015.

Nathaniel Welch, a former Site Reliability Engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America as Staff Site Reliability Engineer in January 2016.

Henry Bridge, former Product Manager at Google, left to join Facebook in June 2011, before becoming Director of Product at Hillary For America in January 2016.

Fred Wulff, a former software engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America in March 2016 as a software engineer and manager.

Divina Videna Chung, former Operations Point of Contact at Google Express, joined Hillary For America in February 2016 as California Phone Bank Captain and Nevada Precinct Captain. She also worked at Uber, before moving to Facebook as an Oculus VR Brand Ambassador.

Danny Bowman, a former Product Specialist at Google, joined Hillary For America in July 2016 as a software engineer.

James Plummer, a former User Experience Designer at Google, joined Hillary For America in January 2016 as Lead Product Designer and Manager.

Andrea Frome, a former software engineer at Google, joined Hillary For America in May 2016 as a senior software engineer.

Maxwell Nunes, a former Political Advertising Fellow at Google, joined Hillary For America’s digital team in June 2015. Nunes currently works in digital policy at Airbnb.

Remy DeCausemaker, a former mentor at Google Summer of Code, joined Hillary For America in June 2016 as Open Source Community Manager, before becoming Open Source Program Manager at Twitter in June 2017.

Dina Lamdany, a former software engineering intern at Google, joined Hillary For America in June 2015 as a data analyst, before moving back to Google as an Associate Product Manager.

Corey Bertram, a former software engineering intern at Google, worked with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and claimed to be “responsible for building backend platform and infra for Hillary Clinton 2016.”

This year, Breitbart Tech also discovered that dozens of former Clinton and Obama staffers were now working at Facebook.

In 2016, WikiLeaks claimed Google was “directly engaged” with and working for the Clinton presidential campaign, while leaked emails showed that former Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt wanted to be the “Head Outside Advisor” to the Clinton Campaign.

Schmidt was also “instrumental” in creating the “The Groundwork,” a company that sought to put Clinton into the White House, and Google worked to hide negative search results of Clinton during the presidential campaign.

In a leaked video released by Breitbart Tech of an internal meeting at Google shortly after Clinton’s presidential campaign defeat in 2016, Google executives, including CEO Sundar Pichai, co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat, and Vice Presidents Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton expressed strong and negative reactions to the results.

Brin announced that the meeting is “probably not the most joyous we’ve had” and claimed to find the election results “deeply offensive,” claiming it “conflicts with many of [Google’s] values.”

After an employee asked if Google would “invest in grassroots, hyper-local efforts to bring tools and services and understanding of Google products and knowledge” so Americans can “make informed decisions that are best for themselves,” Pichai claimed the company would ensure that “educational products” reach “segments of the population [they] are not [currently] fully reaching,” and expressed that “investments in machine learning and AI” could stop “misinformation” shared by “low-information voters.”

The executives also applauded an employee who made a remark about needing to recognize “white privilege” following the election.

Charlie Nash is a reporter for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington, or like his page at Facebook.


read on here https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/...paign=20180913
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-09-2018, 09:43 PM   #314
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Christine Blasey Ford, the CIA, Fusion GPS & George Soros
Posted on September 29, 2018 by State of the Nation
This needs the investigation!

Post from Reclaim America
Taken from a friend; Debi Bourke Russell
(Exceptional research!)

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford Is a Professor at Palo Alto University Who Teaches Graduate Students in Clinical Psychology and currently oversees the CIA Undergraduate Internship Program at Stanford University.

The program was developed by CIA-connected Stanford University Psychiatric Professor Dr. Frederick T. Melges. In 1985, Mr. Melges took under his care the homeless woman Lois Lang who assassinated CIA paymaster Nick Deak, whose CIA’s black operations monies was controlled by Ralph G. Blasey Jr., Dr. Christine Ford’s father.

Christine’s brother, Ralph Blasey, worked for FUSION GPS’ law firm Baker & Hostetler that just happens to be tied to the dodgy Russia dossier put together by MI6 operative Christopher Steele that was subsequently used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. Fusion GPS has done “work” for Planned Parenthood Hilary Clinton and the Democratic National party.

Further proof that the coup plotters that are attempting to overthrow Donald J. Trump are not leftwing communists but tied to George H.W. Bush, the former head of the CIA during the Ford Administration in the 1970s. Who also went by the name of George H. Scherf.

Debra Katz, Ford’s attorney is the vice chair of the Project on Government Oversight — a group funded in large part by George Soros and his Open Society Foundation.

She is a longtime Democratic activist and donor. Katz has, in the past, defended men accused of sexual assault by multiple women, including former President Bill Clinton and disgraced former U.S. Senator Al Franken (D-MN).

She also has ties to George Soros, according to the Washington Times, through her involvement with the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), an organization that has been directly funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundation.

POGO co-signed a letter to Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) with a variety of leftist groups demanding Kavanaugh records, according to FrontPageMag.

She is a part of the “resist” movement, the anti-President Donald Trump group.

Ford’s other brother Thomas Blasey, works at Exelis Inc. with Jill Strzok, Peter Strzok’s Mother.

One of Ford’s attorneys Michael Bromwich is the former federal prosecutor that led FBI Deputy McCabe. McCane’s GoFundMe page was set up by a Washington, D.C. lobbying firm connected to President Barack Obama, and raised over $150,000.

The Bromwich Group is a K Street consulting and PR firm headed by Michael R. Bromwich. Immediately prior to founding the firm, Bromwich served as the first director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management under President Barack Obama.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=105060
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2018, 06:20 PM   #315
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Is this true? If so its pretty incendiary info!

Christine Ford - Ex-boyfriend officially debunks her testimony
Jamie Busby
22 minutes ago



By Jamie Busby

It has emerged today (3rd October) that an unnamed ex-boyfriend of Dr. Christine Ford has gone on the record and made a sworn statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. His name has been redacted so he shall be referred to as "the ex".

The ex has told of how Ford once coached her best friend, Monica McLean, how to deal with a polygraph test. McLean had applied for jobs with the FBI and DOJ where a polygraph was a mandatory part of the interview.

At her own hearing, Ford was directly asked by prosecutor Rachel Mitchell "Have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?".

Ford replied "Never."

The ex added; “I witnessed Dr. Ford help McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam. Dr. Ford explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked, and helped McLean become familiar and less nervous about the exam.”

This destroys the credibility of Ford with regards to the emphasis the democrats have placed on her simply "passing" her own polygraph. It was their trump card, no pun intended. The results of these tests are inadmissible in court anyway due to being so unreliable, yet the democrats have attempted to make the polygraph evidence appear concrete. It is not.

The ex was in a relationship with Ford from 1992-1998 and stated that she never once mentioned Brett Kavanaugh or that she had been the victim of an alleged sexual assault at any point in her life.

The ex also invalidated the mythical claims by Ford that she has a pathological fear of flying and suffers with claustrophobia, an irrational fear of confined spaces that she asserts was triggered by Kavanaugh's alleged assault.

Her supposed fear of flying delayed Ford's own hearing by a week, yet the ex describes how she happily got on a tiny single-propeller plane in order to go island-hopping on holiday in Hawaii. Not to mention a lifetime of jetting around the world. That's the fear of flying and claustrophobia claims down the drain in one foul swoop.

The relationship ended when Ford cheated on the ex, yet she admitted to using his credit card up to a year after the split. That's fraud, Dr. Ford.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, off the back of the testimony from the ex, has demanded to see Ford's therapy notes. She has shared them with the Washington Post but not the Senate as yet.

Grassley wrote; “These notes have been repeatedly cited as corroboration even while written 30 years after the alleged event and in apparent contradiction with testimony and other public statements regarding several key details of the allegations… Please provide the requested materials to the Senate Judiciary Committee immediately.”

These notes are crucial. They can't prove her allegations but they can certainly discredit them.

Dr. Christine Ford had built a back-story that is a web of lies and half truths. It now appears to be unraveling and it will be interesting to see how long the democrats continue to back up a liar and a thief.

Far from Kavanaugh ever getting charged in relation to Ford's testimony, his confirmation as SCOTUS looks more likely by the day. As for Ford, it's clear she is now rapidly heading down a path that leads to perjury charges; it ends with her in jail.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/49...unks-testimony
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2018, 04:33 PM   #316
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

FBI documents detail Clinton and Mueller’s own ‘Russiagate’ – but they’re classified
Published time: 3 Oct, 2018 20:11
Edited time: 4 Oct, 2018 08:00

The FBI is facing new calls to declassify documents relating to the sale of US uranium to a Russian company, documents that could implicate Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and ‘Russiagate’ witch-hunter Robert Mueller.

While Clinton and crew relentlessly push the idea that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the run-up to the 2016 election, and while Special Counsel Robert Mueller searches with a magnifying glass for any sign of this collusion, all parties involved are much quieter when it comes to the Uranium One scandal.

Among a trove of documents relating to the controversial deal, the FBI has identified 37 pages that could shine a light on why then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration approved the deal.

The pages were recently added to the agency’s Freedom of Information Act online vault. The only problem - they’re classified.

The reasons given for the classification will sound familiar to anyone following President Trump’s recent struggle to declassify another set of FBI documents: doing so would violate the privacy of individuals involved, would place national security at risk, would disclose secret law enforcement techniques, and would reveal confidential inter-agency communication, among others.
https://www.rt.com/usa/440256-clinto...ampaign=chrome
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2018, 07:52 PM   #317
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

ACLU has been hijacked by the lunatic left


Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 05-10-2018 at 07:52 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 05:58 PM   #318
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Tucker: The uncivil left reveals their real strategy

iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2018, 09:09 AM   #319
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Kanye west says that the democrats destroy families, drive the man out of the home and encourage dependency on the state

lets face it the SMART grid neo-marxist state IS the new plantation

Tucker Carlson Tonight 10/11/18 | Fox News Today | October 11, 2018

iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2018, 11:22 AM   #320
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 24,925
Likes: 12,979 (7,432 Posts)
Default

Portland has lost its mind

iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.