Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Political Manipulation / Cover-Ups / False Flags

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25-06-2013, 09:14 AM   #21
mensana
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 242
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

English Pravda sheds a slightly different light on this issue:




Putin smiled to Jews. Will Jews smile back?

Russian President Vladimir Putin made a sensational statement during a visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center. He said that the decision to nationalize Schneerson library surrounded by never-ending scandals was made in the 1920s by the first Soviet government, 80 to 85 percent of whose members were Jews.

This assessment of the composition of the National People's Commissars is the first such statement made by the head of state. Neither in the USSR nor later such data was disclosed. These facts were treated, at best, silently, and often, for some unknown reason, were regarded as rabid anti-Semitism. Vladimir Putin has made quite a bold move that in addition to other labels generously placed on him by the opposition may add a label of a reactionary and Jew-hater.

Meanwhile, his visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center had quite noble reasons, and likely was long-awaited by the Jewish community of Russia. The Russian government has decided to meet the requirements of some Hasidic communities and give the said Jewish organization the Schneerson Library, a collection of Hebrew books and manuscripts from the 18th-early 19th century. Judging by the number - 12,000 books and 50,000 rare documents - they chose to meet the demands to the maximum extent.

Read more http://english.pravda.ru/russia/krem...-putin_jews-0/
mensana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 09:27 AM   #22
gary29
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In your cellar, with an axe.
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by john cougar femacamp View Post
Most of the people that identify themselves as "Jewish" today have very little, if any, actual Semitic DNA. Most of them are the descendants of Eastern Europeans in what was known as the Khazarian Empire that converted to Judaism around 740 A.D. They mostly practice Judaism as a form of 'secular traditionalism' as opposed to an actual religion per se.
Since the vast bulk of the "Jews" that are Zionist today are not genetically Semitic, nor practice Judaism religiously, that's a really good question.

The "Jews" responsible for the "Russian" Govt that Putin speaks of were atheist, non-religious, secular practitioners of Judaism from the Caucasus region and had very little, if any, Semitic DNA. It would be very disingenuous to label Putin as an Anti-Semite because of this.
So if these people were, according to you, neither genetically Jewish or practising Jews. How can they be Jewish?
gary29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 10:01 AM   #23
elpressiedente
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: near beachtralia
Posts: 4,070
Likes: 274 (196 Posts)
Default

It was not a "communist" revolution or a "peoples" revolution, it wasnt even a socialist revolution.

It was JEWISH BANKER TAKEOVER ATTEMPT OF the SOVEREIGN NATION of RUSSIA.

And it succeeded, other than a non jewish Stalin ended up in the drivers seat and he needed the jews and their money to consolidate control by killing those with guns or gold.

But when he had full control he murdered the jews who were at the head of every major position of control from the army to every commandant of any gulag.

let the jews and their puppet masters be successful in taking over the entire world and it will be one big gulag.

The battle for you mind was lost a long time ago,

the battle for your blood, sweat and tears, is nearly over.

Isnt that right biker druid.... your communist arent you?


the noble laureate Alexandr Solzhenitsyn wrote it all in his last book that the western jewish controlled publishing houses refuse to translate into english so the sheeple can remain ignorant.
elpressiedente is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 11:32 AM   #24
wandering_sufi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Under the stairs
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

100% agree with you.

85% of all Soviet command offices where Jewish! They Biasly only excepted Jews, the whole revolution was backed by Talmudic Banker Jews.

Read up on the NKVD Jewish Death squads. They where disgusting; making what supposedly happened in the holocaust look like a sunny day.

They Killed around 20,000,000 Ukrainians, Russians, Poles and Slavs. The people who they where supposedly "liberating". There are thousands of instances of them massacring people for no reason. Just shooting them at an edge of a ditch. Thousands of Towns, and Villages went missing after they came through.

They started the war with Finland, by shelling their own men and blaming it on Finland.

They where the ones responsible for all the deaths at Stalin's great purge.

These guys where the real "Nazis".

And the majority where JEWS
__________________
If Tehran insists on combining the Persian imperial tradition with contemporary Islamic fervor,
then a collision with America — and, indeed, with its negotiating partners of the Six — is unavoidable.
Iran simply cannot be permitted to fulfill a dream of imperial rule in a region of such importance to the rest of the world.

- Henry Kissinger

Last edited by wandering_sufi; 25-06-2013 at 11:36 AM.
wandering_sufi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 12:52 PM   #25
positive_forward
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Foot hills heading for the mountains
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

When you find out such truths for some of us it makes us look at the wars in a different way & the realisation of what Germany/Europe & various allies were up against.

Some Jews opposed Communism.

Although, some of the leading Marxists/Bolsheviks et al in Germany were Jewish (including pre war) A large number who'd been given asylum in Germany after world war I.

This subversive element stirring up riots/violence trying to take control of govt & turn Germany into a Communist state, was one reason for the rise of Hitler's NSDAP (the communists got their wish after the war with the East German state).

The chaos & destruction brought about by Communists across Europe resulted in deportations & the so called pogroms against Jews.


Also nations opposed the Communist globalist ideology (Soviet dictatorship ruling & making laws for these Satellite nations from Russia) European Nations wanted self determination, to run their own country's affairs & the right to practice their own unique cultures. Same as what Germany wanted.
positive_forward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 12:58 PM   #26
lets blow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 4 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary29 View Post
So if these people were, according to you, neither genetically Jewish or practising Jews. How can they be Jewish?
Uh uh ... now now ... there is no such thing as a genetic Jew. We all know that. Those "tests" to "prove" today's Jews are descended from semitic Jews are all bunkum.

Judaism is just a religion ... anyone can be one if they want to.

In the same vein no one can be a genetic Christian or Muslim ... no one can be a genetic Jew.

Last edited by lets blow; 25-06-2013 at 01:00 PM.
lets blow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 12:58 PM   #27
positive_forward
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Foot hills heading for the mountains
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

PAWNS OF YALTA: SOVIET REFUGEES AND AMERICA'S ROLE IN THEIR REPATRIATION by Mark R. Elliott. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982, 287pp, $17.95, ISBN 0-252-00897-9.

It is still a surprise to many in the West when they learn that by 1944-45, up to 40% of some "German" formations, and 10 to 15% of all units, were composed of Osttruppen (ex- Red Army men). In addition to the Hilfswillige scattered throughout the German armed forces, three divisions composed of Soviet racial minorities fought on the Eastern Front with the Axis: the Cossack Cavalry Division, the Turkish Division (made up of Moslems from Soviet Central Asia), and the Ukrainian Waffen SS Division "Galicia." And by November 1944, the first division of the proposed Russian Liberation Army, commanded by former Red Army General Andrei Vlasov, became operational. It did engage in some fighting against the Red Army in 1945 before surrendering to the U.S. Third Army on 10 May. Elliott points out that these one million ex- Red Army soldiers who performed duties in German uniform "amounted to the largest military defection in history."

Both the U.S. and Britain were signatories to the 1929 Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of Prisoners of War. This obligated parties to treat POWs "on the basis of the uniforms worn at the time of capture." While the war continued, the U.S. complied with this bilateral agreement, not wishing to give the Germans cause to mistreat American POWs of German, Italian, or Japanese descent. After VE-Day, when there was no longer danger of Nazi reprisal, the U.S. (and Britain) quickly set about repatriating German POWs on the basis of their nationality, in flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention. A secret protocol of the Yalta agreement also provided for the forced return of Russian ex- concentration camp inmates and others who had managed to escape from Stalin's slaughter house, thus obliterating, in the words of the author, "all trace of the proud Western tradition of political asylum."

The British went a step further by handing over to the NKVD a number of former White Russian officers, some of whom had fought the Bolsheviks during the Second World War. All of them had been living outside of Russia since the end of the Russian Civil War and carried foreign passports or League of Nations stateless persons I.D.s. Alexander Solzhenitsyn has characterized this as "an act of double dealing consistent with the spirit of traditional English diplomacy."

American servicemen, led by wartime pro-Soviet propaganda to believe that Stalin was kindly "Uncle Joe" overseeing a noble human experiment in the USSR, were shocked at how most Russians in their charge reacted to the news that they were going to be repatriated to their Soviet homeland. This is illustrated by what took place at Dachau on 17 June 1946, after American authorities informed 400 Soviet refugees that they were going to be sent back to Russia:

The scene inside was one of human carnage. The crazed men were attempting to take their own lives by any means. Guards cut down some trying to hang themselves from the rafters; two others disembowled themselves; another man forced his head through a window and ran his throat over the glass fragments; others begged to be shot. Robert Murphy reported that "tear gas forced them out of the building into the snow where those who had cut and stabbed themselves fell exhausted and bleeding in the snow." Thirty-one men tried to take their own lives. Eleven succeeded,' nine by hanging and two from knife wounds. Camp authorities managed to entrain the rematntng 368. Despite the presence of American guards and a Soviet liaison officer, six of these escaped en route to the Soviet occupation zone. More and more the repatriation of unwilling persons was coming to disturb battle-hardened troops.

The following month similar events took place at the Plattling camp in Bavaria. These were described by an eye-witness, U.S. Army translator William Sloane Coffin, Jr.:

Despite the fact that there were three GIs to every returning Russian, I saw several men commit suicide, Two rammed their beads through windows sawing their necks on the broken glass until they cut their jugular veins. Another took his leather boot-straps, tied a loop to the top of his triple-decker bunk, put his head through the noose and did a back flip over the edge which broke his neck. . . The memory is so painful that it's almost impossible for me to write about it. My part in the Plattling operation left me a burden of guilt I am sure to carry the rest of my life.

Through suicide, several thousand Russians managed to escape the horrors that awaited returnees in the East.

Like Tolstoy, Elliott reviews the Stalinist attitude toward Russians who had spent time outside Soviet control during the course of the war. Soviet Decree #270 of 1942 labeled as deserters Red Army troopers who surrendered to the enemy. Forced laborers were also considered to be traitors. Relatives of POWs and dragooned workers were likewise treated as if they had personally committed acts of treason. Stalin's government, as noted above, rejected attempts by the Germans and the International Red Cross to obtain Soviet compliance with the Hague Convention.

After the 1939-40 Winter War with Finland, returned Soviet POWs were either shot or sent to slave labor camps in the Far North or Siberia. This is also how the victims of forced repatriation were dealt with. According to Elliott, of the approximately 2,500,000 Russians repatriated by the Western Allies, some 300,000 were executed by the NKVD soon after their delivery to Soviet authorities. With a few exceptions, the rest were condemned to the lingering doom of 10 to 25 year sentences in labor camps, from which ordeal few survived. Elliott also points out that the USSR never released 1.5 to 2 million German POWs, 200,000 to 300,000 Japanese POWs, and did not repatriate those few ex-Axis soldiers who did manage to survive the rigors of GULAG until 1956.

Elliott argues that the U.S. participated in this sordid business out of concern for the safety of 24,000 American servicemen who were in Soviet-controlled territory at the end of the war. However, he admits that U.S. cooperation with Soviet authorities was not reciprocated. And even after the last G.I. returned in July 1945, the U.S. continued the forced repatriation of luckless Russian POWs, refugees, and Vlasovites. (The last documented cases of forced repatriation took place in May and June 1947, Operations "Keelhaul" and "Eastwind"; Allied Forces Headquarters obtained Soviet assurances that they would accept corpses if the repatriation operation led to fatalities.)

Not everyone in higher circles approved of the repatriation policy; the author reveals instances where individual military officers and civilian government officials disobeyed or opposed the Yalta provisions. In June 1945, General Patton simply let 5000 Russian POWs go, and other commanders permitted lightly-guarded Russians to slip away. Secretary of War Henry Stimson was a vigorous opponent of forced repatriation, as were Acting Secretary of State Joseph Grew and Attorney General Francis Biddle, who felt that "Even if these men should be technically traitors to their own government, I think the time-honored rule of asylum should be applied." In the opinion of R.W. Flournoy, the State Department's legal advisor. "nothing in the [Geneva) Convention either requires or justifies this Government in sending the unfortunate Soviet nationals in question to Russia, where they will almost certainly be liquidated."

This book serves as a companion volume to Count Tolstoy's The Secret Betrayal which deals largely with the British role in forced repatriation. It is a grim chapter of our recent history - and one totally ignored in contemporary textbooks and most treatments of the Second World War and its aftermath.

Last edited by positive_forward; 25-06-2013 at 01:02 PM.
positive_forward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 01:01 PM   #28
lets blow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 4 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain cee bee View Post
Will the people of the united states of unconsciousness finally realise the Russian judo expert is right and the Israeli bum-boy mincing around the white house is nothing but a little bitch?

You put that so well ...
lets blow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 01:12 PM   #29
lets blow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 4 (4 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary29 View Post
So if these people were, according to you, neither genetically Jewish or practising Jews. How can they be Jewish?
To answer your question, most describe themselves as secular Jews or atheist ... (Or in Wikipedia speak, secular Jews who are the opposite of those who believe in God.

Quote:
According to a 2010 Israel Central Bureau of Statistics study[26] on Israelis aged over 18, 8% of Israeli Jews define themselves as haredim (or Ultra-Orthodox); an additional 12% are "religious" (non-haredi orthodox, also known as: dati leumi/national-religious or religious zionist); 13% consider themselves "religious-traditionalists" (mostly adhering to Jewish Halakha); 25% are "non-religious traditionalists" (only partly respecting the Jewish Halakha), and 43% are "secular". Among the seculars, 53% say they believe in God. Due to the higher birth rate of religious and traditionalists over seculars, the share of religious and traditionalists among the overall population is even higher.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel

43% of Israeli Jews identify as secular. Of that 53% identify as believing in God, so by definition 47% do not ... so are atheists.
lets blow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2013, 03:18 PM   #30
john cougar femacamp
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary29 View Post
So if these people were, according to you, neither genetically Jewish or practising Jews. How can they be Jewish?
They are "practicing" Jews. They practice it as a form of secular traditionalism as opposed to a Religion. They celebrate Jewish Holidays, observe Talmudic Law etc etc but don't believe in God. They embrace the Tradition but yet have no Faith.
john cougar femacamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 07:16 AM   #31
mensana
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 242
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Put a face to the name



Council of People’s Commissars, Bolshevik-Socialist Revolutionary coalition government, December 1917-March 1918.
Isaac Steinberg, far left; Vladimir Lenin, 8th from left; Joseph Stalin, standing to Lenin’s right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council...27s_Commissars


Putin: Jews Ruined Russia – But Now We're Pals, Eh?

By J.J. Goldberg



Quote:

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

http://blogs.forward.com/jj-goldberg...-were-pals-eh/
mensana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 08:56 AM   #32
wakeup2nwo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 16,643
Likes: 57 (39 Posts)
Default

Communism was invented by thr Rothschild's so why is this a surprise?
__________________
"Its plain to see that the seeds from you and me, will be the ones that lead us towards unity, that's if we treat them right, must teach them right, raise your kids better than you was and see what it does" EDI - Outlawz
wakeup2nwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 08:57 AM   #33
wakeup2nwo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 16,643
Likes: 57 (39 Posts)
Default

Puttin lovers are no different to Obama lovers.
__________________
"Its plain to see that the seeds from you and me, will be the ones that lead us towards unity, that's if we treat them right, must teach them right, raise your kids better than you was and see what it does" EDI - Outlawz

Last edited by wakeup2nwo; 26-06-2013 at 08:58 AM.
wakeup2nwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 12:15 PM   #34
wandering_sufi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Under the stairs
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Just to be clear also. Rothschild/Khazar Jews, are Fake Jews.

This is what a real Israelite looks like:


This is what a fake Israelite looks like:


Judaism has been hijacked by Khazar
__________________
If Tehran insists on combining the Persian imperial tradition with contemporary Islamic fervor,
then a collision with America — and, indeed, with its negotiating partners of the Six — is unavoidable.
Iran simply cannot be permitted to fulfill a dream of imperial rule in a region of such importance to the rest of the world.

- Henry Kissinger
wandering_sufi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 12:47 PM   #35
susannah1
Inactive
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by positive_forward View Post
PAWNS OF YALTA: SOVIET REFUGEES AND AMERICA'S ROLE IN THEIR REPATRIATION by Mark R. Elliott. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982, 287pp, $17.95, ISBN 0-252-00897-9.

It is still a surprise to many in the West when they learn that by 1944-45, up to 40% of some "German" formations, and 10 to 15% of all units, were composed of Osttruppen (ex- Red Army men). In addition to the Hilfswillige scattered throughout the German armed forces, three divisions composed of Soviet racial minorities fought on the Eastern Front with the Axis: the Cossack Cavalry Division, the Turkish Division (made up of Moslems from Soviet Central Asia), and the Ukrainian Waffen SS Division "Galicia." And by November 1944, the first division of the proposed Russian Liberation Army, commanded by former Red Army General Andrei Vlasov, became operational. It did engage in some fighting against the Red Army in 1945 before surrendering to the U.S. Third Army on 10 May. Elliott points out that these one million ex- Red Army soldiers who performed duties in German uniform "amounted to the largest military defection in history."

Both the U.S. and Britain were signatories to the 1929 Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of Prisoners of War. This obligated parties to treat POWs "on the basis of the uniforms worn at the time of capture." While the war continued, the U.S. complied with this bilateral agreement, not wishing to give the Germans cause to mistreat American POWs of German, Italian, or Japanese descent. After VE-Day, when there was no longer danger of Nazi reprisal, the U.S. (and Britain) quickly set about repatriating German POWs on the basis of their nationality, in flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention. A secret protocol of the Yalta agreement also provided for the forced return of Russian ex- concentration camp inmates and others who had managed to escape from Stalin's slaughter house, thus obliterating, in the words of the author, "all trace of the proud Western tradition of political asylum."

The British went a step further by handing over to the NKVD a number of former White Russian officers, some of whom had fought the Bolsheviks during the Second World War. All of them had been living outside of Russia since the end of the Russian Civil War and carried foreign passports or League of Nations stateless persons I.D.s. Alexander Solzhenitsyn has characterized this as "an act of double dealing consistent with the spirit of traditional English diplomacy."

American servicemen, led by wartime pro-Soviet propaganda to believe that Stalin was kindly "Uncle Joe" overseeing a noble human experiment in the USSR, were shocked at how most Russians in their charge reacted to the news that they were going to be repatriated to their Soviet homeland. This is illustrated by what took place at Dachau on 17 June 1946, after American authorities informed 400 Soviet refugees that they were going to be sent back to Russia:

The scene inside was one of human carnage. The crazed men were attempting to take their own lives by any means. Guards cut down some trying to hang themselves from the rafters; two others disembowled themselves; another man forced his head through a window and ran his throat over the glass fragments; others begged to be shot. Robert Murphy reported that "tear gas forced them out of the building into the snow where those who had cut and stabbed themselves fell exhausted and bleeding in the snow." Thirty-one men tried to take their own lives. Eleven succeeded,' nine by hanging and two from knife wounds. Camp authorities managed to entrain the rematntng 368. Despite the presence of American guards and a Soviet liaison officer, six of these escaped en route to the Soviet occupation zone. More and more the repatriation of unwilling persons was coming to disturb battle-hardened troops.

The following month similar events took place at the Plattling camp in Bavaria. These were described by an eye-witness, U.S. Army translator William Sloane Coffin, Jr.:

Despite the fact that there were three GIs to every returning Russian, I saw several men commit suicide, Two rammed their beads through windows sawing their necks on the broken glass until they cut their jugular veins. Another took his leather boot-straps, tied a loop to the top of his triple-decker bunk, put his head through the noose and did a back flip over the edge which broke his neck. . . The memory is so painful that it's almost impossible for me to write about it. My part in the Plattling operation left me a burden of guilt I am sure to carry the rest of my life.

Through suicide, several thousand Russians managed to escape the horrors that awaited returnees in the East.

Like Tolstoy, Elliott reviews the Stalinist attitude toward Russians who had spent time outside Soviet control during the course of the war. Soviet Decree #270 of 1942 labeled as deserters Red Army troopers who surrendered to the enemy. Forced laborers were also considered to be traitors. Relatives of POWs and dragooned workers were likewise treated as if they had personally committed acts of treason. Stalin's government, as noted above, rejected attempts by the Germans and the International Red Cross to obtain Soviet compliance with the Hague Convention.

After the 1939-40 Winter War with Finland, returned Soviet POWs were either shot or sent to slave labor camps in the Far North or Siberia. This is also how the victims of forced repatriation were dealt with. According to Elliott, of the approximately 2,500,000 Russians repatriated by the Western Allies, some 300,000 were executed by the NKVD soon after their delivery to Soviet authorities. With a few exceptions, the rest were condemned to the lingering doom of 10 to 25 year sentences in labor camps, from which ordeal few survived. Elliott also points out that the USSR never released 1.5 to 2 million German POWs, 200,000 to 300,000 Japanese POWs, and did not repatriate those few ex-Axis soldiers who did manage to survive the rigors of GULAG until 1956.

Elliott argues that the U.S. participated in this sordid business out of concern for the safety of 24,000 American servicemen who were in Soviet-controlled territory at the end of the war. However, he admits that U.S. cooperation with Soviet authorities was not reciprocated. And even after the last G.I. returned in July 1945, the U.S. continued the forced repatriation of luckless Russian POWs, refugees, and Vlasovites. (The last documented cases of forced repatriation took place in May and June 1947, Operations "Keelhaul" and "Eastwind"; Allied Forces Headquarters obtained Soviet assurances that they would accept corpses if the repatriation operation led to fatalities.)

Not everyone in higher circles approved of the repatriation policy; the author reveals instances where individual military officers and civilian government officials disobeyed or opposed the Yalta provisions. In June 1945, General Patton simply let 5000 Russian POWs go, and other commanders permitted lightly-guarded Russians to slip away. Secretary of War Henry Stimson was a vigorous opponent of forced repatriation, as were Acting Secretary of State Joseph Grew and Attorney General Francis Biddle, who felt that "Even if these men should be technically traitors to their own government, I think the time-honored rule of asylum should be applied." In the opinion of R.W. Flournoy, the State Department's legal advisor. "nothing in the [Geneva) Convention either requires or justifies this Government in sending the unfortunate Soviet nationals in question to Russia, where they will almost certainly be liquidated."

This book serves as a companion volume to Count Tolstoy's The Secret Betrayal which deals largely with the British role in forced repatriation. It is a grim chapter of our recent history - and one totally ignored in contemporary textbooks and most treatments of the Second World War and its aftermath.
Spot on, I have read about this and my Father told me too. British Royal Family had their hand in this from the start, puppeteering the UK Government.
We don't forget this.
susannah1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 02:26 PM   #36
tinyint
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Meerkat Manor
Posts: 20,776
Likes: 9 (8 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by susannah1 View Post
Spot on, I have read about this and my Father told me too. British Royal Family had their hand in this from the start, puppeteering the UK Government.
We don't forget this.
Not to mention, that uncle Joe simply killed soviet POW, for "collarorating with the enemy". Thousands killed by their own leadership.
They ran vast loudspeakers at the front, and these speakers put out endless, "Soviet soldiers, German enemy, surrender and change side" only to be sent to a gulag or shot. So insane what the Soviets did.
tinyint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 03:13 PM   #37
Firewand
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,390
Likes: 3,456 (1,961 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wandering_sufi View Post
Just to be clear also. Rothschild/Khazar Jews, are Fake Jews.

This is what a real Israelite looks like:


This is what a fake Israelite looks like:


Judaism has been hijacked by Khazar
I can't help noticing the high number of these people who ware glasses. It's Probably all that wailing and head bopping when reading the talmud from a young age I would imagine it's quite a strain on the eyes trying to focus on a sentence when you're also bopping your head backwards and forwards like that. It's either hereditary or all the hours and hours they spend reading doctrine, I'll go with the later.
__________________
The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to look things in the face and know them for what they are. Marcus Aurelius.
Firewand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 04:35 PM   #38
drakul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,854
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mensana View Post
English Pravda sheds a slightly different light on this issue:

Putin smiled to Jews. Will Jews smile back?

Russian President Vladimir Putin made a sensational statement during a visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center. He said that the decision to nationalize Schneerson library surrounded by never-ending scandals was made in the 1920s by the first Soviet government, 80 to 85 percent of whose members were Jews.

This assessment of the composition of the National People's Commissars is the first such statement made by the head of state. Neither in the USSR nor later such data was disclosed. These facts were treated, at best, silently, and often, for some unknown reason, were regarded as rabid anti-Semitism. Vladimir Putin has made quite a bold move that in addition to other labels generously placed on him by the opposition may add a label of a reactionary and Jew-hater.

Meanwhile, his visit to the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center had quite noble reasons, and likely was long-awaited by the Jewish community of Russia. The Russian government has decided to meet the requirements of some Hasidic communities and give the said Jewish organization the Schneerson Library, a collection of Hebrew books and manuscripts from the 18th-early 19th century. Judging by the number - 12,000 books and 50,000 rare documents - they chose to meet the demands to the maximum extent.

Read more http://english.pravda.ru/russia/krem...-putin_jews-0/

Putin - with a slap in the face and a smile - Here's your boo-ooks!
drakul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 05:45 PM   #39
badtv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 8 (7 Posts)
Default

just listened to this, a bit of background history of the 'russian' revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrieUdYe_e8
__________________
"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." --
AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957
badtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2013, 07:34 PM   #40
believenothing
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3 (3 Posts)
Default

Most revolutions wind up punishing the majority to disproportionately empower the minority which is in theory justified out of revenge.

You can't please everybody all the time. Seriously, if you had a good thing going (in terms of government) within a small city state where 982/1000 people were happy, should you really cater to the remaining 18/1000? Absolutely not, but that's what Marxist ideology demands and that's what the Bolshevik revolution was really about. And Marxists will be happy to promote "democracy" and 50% "majority" consensus as a means to an end, but they'll complain about the 18/1000 conflicting with their promotion of "democratic" values. They are hypocrites.

It would make much more sense to exile the 18/1000 so that everybody was happy. Neo-Bolsehvik revolutionaries, social liberals, and Marxists no matter what their ethno-religious makeup is are often always a significant minority, small enough to exile even though the idea of exile is discouraged in our current establishment. And because we don't exile problematic social movements in our current establishment, they gain momentum and eventually through suversion and deception they can gain commanding influence. This is what happened in Russia. And then they imposed their way on the majority which was punishment for the majority and caused famine and suffering (and many deaths).

The ideology of any kind of minority group designed to "liberate" themselves (and according to them other minorities but in reality they are used as a means to an end and wind up punished along with the majority) which is then in turn forced upon the masses is not good for the masses and only good for the minority group who then has control. The Western world's "Powers that be" in terms of commanding influence are what in the US are called "liberals" and elsewhere by various other names but universally glued together by Marxist principles. Whether they are of one cohesive bloodline or group or religion is not my point at all, they all share a communal idea that they wish to impose upon the majority. But this idea is a form of collectivist punishment.

It would be more realistic to exile like-minded minorities to form their own states with such an ideology for themselves where they would have no opposition and would all agree with each other. But that's not what they want. They don't want understanding in isolation where everybody is happy, they want chaos and disorder in a forced cultural clash which only ends in destruction and while the masses are fighting, they take total control of the reigns and bring about the soviet union of planet earth, the Marxist endgame which will never come to pass.

But speaking of Marxism, Bolsheviks, and exile, I am an American. And our statue of "Liberty" has a post-statue poem dedicated to it which has determined the US is the nation of 'exiles'. It wasn't exiles who brought upon the Bolshevik revolution but their successors have all been "exiled" here since the failure of the idea and they changed it into cultural Marxism. And now they are using the US to enforce the US-version of everything on the entire world. Right now in Europe they are highly successful in causing the cultural genocide of indigenous Europeans through forced immigration and multiculutralism. In the middle east they have created an atmosphere of instability trying to force an incompatible culture on the indigenous natives. The fact is that the idea, the Marxist idea, is an opinion of a minority. Incompatible with various other opinions. Marxists would say such opinions are immoral and wrong, and others say the same about Marxism. Marxism has never addressed its critics and besides using cultural subversion in the West the theory has not changed in over 100 years. We've seen it in execution over in Russia. It's wrong. It is the ideology of a psychopathic ind.

The liberals in the US fail to analyze the world objectively in favor of a one-size-fits-all opinion of their own making, incompatible with most others, which they insist is the only opinion we should collectively share. This is why Marxist ideology and US liberalism is a problem. It's US imperialism, US-driven globalization and enslavement of the world to a minority cult idea. This is not liberation but madness. And it must stop immediately no matter what it takes.

Last edited by believenothing; 26-06-2013 at 07:46 PM.
believenothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cheka, jewnews, jta, putin, soviet russia

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.