Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25-01-2008, 10:17 PM   #1
cruise4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,865
Likes: 87 (62 Posts)
Default Two die following cervical cancer vaccination

Alert over jab for girls as two die following cervical cancer vaccination
By JENNY HOPE
Last updated at 10:38am on 25th January 2008

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1774


A jab that could be given to hundreds of thousands of schoolgirls this autumn was at the centre at a safety scare last night following the deaths of two young women.

European regulators are investigating the "sudden and unexpected" deaths of the women who received Gardasil, one of two jabs to protect against cervical cancer licensed for use in the UK.

The vaccine has been hailed as a breakthrough by the Department of Health, which is backing an annual programme of vaccination for girls aged 11 to 13 years starting in September.

The jab is already available privately and a thirteen-year-old girl from London became the first in the country to receive the cervical cancer vaccine in 2006. Hollie Anderson's mother, Lisa, paid £450 for her to have the jab after seeing her own mother battle against cancer.

Hollie Anderson from London had the cervical cancer jab aged 13

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) said one of the young women who received Gardasil died in Germany while the other was in Austria. It has not released their ages.

It follows the deaths of three young women aged 12, 19 and 22 who were reported to have died in the U.S. days after Gardasil was administered, with 1,700 patients suffering "adverse reactions". There were no previous recorded deaths in Europe.

The EMEA said: "In both cases, the cause of death could not be identified.

"No causal relationship has been established between the deaths of the young women and the administration of Gardasil."

A spokesman said 1.5million people had been given the vaccine in Europe.

She said there were no plans to change advice on the use of the vaccine.

The UK vaccination programme will protect girls against the sexually-transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV) that causes cervical cancer.


Investigations have begun after two young women died suddenly after receiving Gardasil

It should help cut up to 1,000 deaths a year from the disease.

Gardasil, made by Merck, is one of the jabs to be used initially. The other is Cervarix, made by Glaxo-SmithKline.

Dr Nicholas Kitchin, medical director at Sanofi Pasteur MSD, which markets Gardasil, said: "The authorities in the two countries have looked intensively at these two cases and have not established a causal link, and this has been endorsed by the EMEA.

"The fact that the EMEA is not taking any action on the back of this should be seen as reassuring that the product remains safe."
cruise4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2008, 10:31 PM   #2
catfood
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Up north.UK
Posts: 760
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Do you think these jabs cud be a mass infertility operation?
‘Sustainable development’ gives a strong motivation!
catfood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2008, 10:52 PM   #3
cruise4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,865
Likes: 87 (62 Posts)
Default

Yes, could be. Its certainly not for what they are saying its for.
cruise4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2008, 04:32 PM   #4
pri01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 92 (50 Posts)
Default

If there were a virus responsible for cervical cancer, then tis very clever since it targets only young women. Hence, my daughter will not be given the vaccine. Other warnings about this vaccine are seen in the numbers affected by this condition. There was a reported 1000 deaths per year in the reports surrounding this. The numbers do not add up if you think about the millions the government is prepared to spend, to save so little.

I think there could be an increase in infertility when these programmes are rolled out. On a more sinister note, they could actually cause the disease that they are meant to protect these women from. After all, if it isn't that big of a problem based on the reported numbers, then business will in the future be very much booming with all the girls needing treatment.

Who are the winners here?
pri01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2008, 05:49 PM   #5
armoured_amazon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 21,303
Likes: 311 (142 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catfood View Post
Do you think these jabs cud be a mass infertility operation?
‘Sustainable development’ gives a strong motivation!
I think so.
armoured_amazon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.