Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Big Brother / Microchipping / Problem-Reaction-Solution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2012, 10:27 PM   #41
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Why would someone AKA "Mike Corley" go through all the hassle to post this story on a number of website's over countless years giving a very detailed account of his situation?

Why would the media use such a quiet/low key technique to harass/victimize?
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 01:43 PM   #42
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

More info etc: http://www.mi5.com/
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 09:39 PM   #43
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

A conversation with jeff rooker MP & mike corley;

Article : 2528
Date : 23-06-2007
From : [email protected]
Sujet : MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (9223)

From: [email protected] (Rael A. Fenchurch)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics .british
Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996

Mike,

>"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation
>but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they
>do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh
>but it's your fault". It's a mad world.

Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So?


Rael...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Rael A. Fenchurch ([email protected], http://www.midnight.org/rael/) ---
--- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" ---
--- "Doubt or Die" ---
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

================================================== ========================

From: Andy Howard
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics .british
Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996

In article: [email protected] (Mike Corley) wr
I got a few
> "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio
> but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy".

Which Labour MP Mike?
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Andy Howard EMail [email protected] |
| My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). |
| If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

================================================== ==================

Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics .british,soc.culture.br$
Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics .british,soc.culture.b$
References: <[email protected]> <4h6gkb$ivc$
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Distribution:

Mike Corley ([email protected]) wrote:
: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So?

: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I
: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find
: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it.

I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep
useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time".

The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I
find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as
having been [email protected]. I don't know where I got the
address from. I'm so disorganised!

================================================== ==================

Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics .british
From: [email protected] (John J Smith)
Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk
Message-ID:
Sender: [email protected] (RFC931)
Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd
References:
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT
Lines: 54

In article ,
Mike Corley wrote:
>Mike Corley ([email protected]) wrote:
>: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
>: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
>: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
>: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So?
>
>: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I
>: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find
>: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it.
>
>I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep
>useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time".

Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that.

>The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I
>find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as
>having been [email protected]. I don't know where I got the
>address from. I'm so disorganised!

I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote:

Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known
Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you
Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted
Smid>by MI5.

Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address
Smid>available if you require).
Smid>
Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the
Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the
Smid>email in which he did so..

Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have
Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic
Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are
Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd
Smid>be nice...

Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however.

His reply, surpise, suprise was:

MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of
MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted
MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do.

Your move, Mike.

Smid

9223

taken form here:

http://www.frameip.com/nntp/alt-fr-c...-3-96-9223.htm
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 10:51 PM   #44
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Without posting on varied websites how could "Mike Corley" have known if there where other people to warn? or attain help? pre millennia the internet was not as accessible as it is today so to go through all that trouble one ask's himself is/was "Mike" really telling the truth?

Last edited by fordavoid; 09-02-2012 at 10:53 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 05:00 PM   #45
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Also why would he want to portray himself the way he did etc to the general public?

and why have the media "NEVER" highlighted/covered the issue of electronic harassment mind control etc, even with it being a regular problem in many peoples lifes?

instead using the information mediums to cover such un important issues
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 04:29 PM   #46
paz98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

One interesting thing on the 'website' of this guy is a recorded conversation he has with a well-spoken elderley sounding guy, which last time i tried playing back, returned with an QT error.

Sometimes I had suspicions who this guy (mike corley) was. Why would he use a number of different names? why not stick to one? Could he be used as a disinformation agent or genuine?

This guy got eaten, there is an art exhibit 'Corley Radio'? and a musical theatre production 'The Corley Conspiracy'. So he has had some public attention and a bit of a novelty. Google it.

Mainstream media channels won't touch it because they are in the 'pocket' of the upstairs folks, that sanction the use of this technology on people. Mainstream media followers would find EH/DEW/MC too incredulous. They are too busy, with their own issues. The UK masses are too closed, policed and easily led IMO.
__________________
paz98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 04:55 PM   #47
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

no idea who Mike Corley is, some thing is very off on this thread.

Fordavoid, your posts are setting off big red flags, apologies if you are not here with an agenda, but I think you are.

My gut reaction is that you are a gangstalker, again apologies if i'm wrong, just my impression.
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 05:45 PM   #48
dreamweaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,882
Likes: 24 (13 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martg View Post
no idea who Mike Corley is, some thing is very off on this thread.

Fordavoid, your posts are setting off big red flags, apologies if you are not here with an agenda, but I think you are.

My gut reaction is that you are a gangstalker, again apologies if i'm wrong, just my impression.
Wow, that name takes me back a bit!

"Mike Corley" (not his real name, his real name is an Eastern European sounding one apparently) was notorious in the days of the dial-up internet (mid-1990s) for spamming UK newsgroups with his tales of being harassed by MI5. He also allegedly faxed and emailed MPs with the same material repeatedly.

He believed that TV presenters were watching him through his TV and that any remarks or expressions of theirs were directed personally at him. Passing remarks by strangers in the street were further evidence of MI5 harassment, according to "Mike".

He was one of the most celebrated "net kooks" at that time, who people would often write about in those early "wow, look how weird and wacky the internet is" sort of articles.
__________________
Congratulations, you found the secret message. Shhh!
dreamweaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 05:49 PM   #49
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamweaver View Post
Wow, that name takes me back a bit!

"Mike Corley" (not his real name, his real name is an Eastern European sounding one apparently) was notorious in the days of the dial-up internet (mid-1990s) for spamming UK newsgroups with his tales of being harassed by MI5. He also allegedly faxed and emailed MPs with the same material repeatedly.

He believed that TV presenters were watching him through his TV and that any remarks or expressions of theirs were directed personally at him. Passing remarks by strangers in the street were further evidence of MI5 harassment, according to "Mike".

He was one of the most celebrated "net kooks" at that time, who people would often write about in those early "wow, look how weird and wacky the internet is" sort of articles.
Thanks dreamweaver, that's confirmed my suspicion.
something didn't smell right about this thread.
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 06:22 PM   #50
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Quote:
A straw man is a component of an argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.[1][2]
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 06:32 PM   #51
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
who are you talking about?

me?
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 06:39 PM   #52
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martg View Post
who are you talking about?

me?
no the person who started this thread i believe used the "Mike Corley" case as a strawman to discredit mind control & electronic harrassement victims
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/

Last edited by deca; 13-02-2012 at 06:39 PM.
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 06:40 PM   #53
martg
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,041
Likes: 7 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
no the person who started this thread i believe used the "Mike Corley" case as a strawman to discredit mind control & electronic harrassement victims
ah I see, yes I think you're right.
martg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 06:46 PM   #54
dreamweaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,882
Likes: 24 (13 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
no the person who started this thread i believe used the "Mike Corley" case as a strawman to discredit mind control & electronic harrassement victims
For what it's worth, the Mike Corley guy had mental health issues and was on meds. He openly acknowledged this with people who met him - but he was adamant that his issues were unrelated to his condition.

But having said that, mind control and electronic harassment are real issues - and it does seem a bit off that the OP chose to mention you as a pretext for starting a thread about the Corley case.
__________________
Congratulations, you found the secret message. Shhh!
dreamweaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 07:13 PM   #55
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paz98 View Post
One interesting thing on the 'website' of this guy is a recorded conversation he has with a well-spoken elderley sounding guy, which last time i tried playing back, returned with an QT error.

Sometimes I had suspicions who this guy (mike corley) was. Why would he use a number of different names? why not stick to one? Could he be used as a disinformation agent or genuine?

This guy got eaten, there is an art exhibit 'Corley Radio'? and a musical theatre production 'The Corley Conspiracy'. So he has had some public attention and a bit of a novelty. Google it.

Mainstream media channels won't touch it because they are in the 'pocket' of the upstairs folks, that sanction the use of this technology on people. Mainstream media followers would find EH/DEW/MC too incredulous. They are too busy, with their own issues. The UK masses are too closed, policed and easily led IMO.
Is it possible that the culprit/media would want to cover up the issue using comedy, although i do vaguely remember reading that "Corley Radio" is in no way affiliated with "Mike Corley" the individual.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 07:18 PM   #56
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martg View Post
no idea who Mike Corley is, some thing is very off on this thread.

Fordavoid, your posts are setting off big red flags, apologies if you are not here with an agenda, but I think you are.

My gut reaction is that you are a gangstalker, again apologies if i'm wrong, just my impression.

Big red flags? my agenda is mearly highlighting this case to the public who have a right to know if this sort of harassment is rife in the UK if not world media,to warn and make a solid foundation for any issues that they may encounter regarding electronic harassment/mind control victimization.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 07:29 PM   #57
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamweaver View Post
Wow, that name takes me back a bit!

"Mike Corley" (not his real name, his real name is an Eastern European sounding one apparently) was notorious in the days of the dial-up internet (mid-1990s) for spamming UK newsgroups with his tales of being harassed by MI5. He also allegedly faxed and emailed MPs with the same material repeatedly.

He believed that TV presenters were watching him through his TV and that any remarks or expressions of theirs were directed personally at him. Passing remarks by strangers in the street were further evidence of MI5 harassment, according to "Mike".

He was one of the most celebrated "net kooks" at that time, who people would often write about in those early "wow, look how weird and wacky the internet is" sort of articles.
Perhaps "Mike Corley" was speaking the truth, using the term celebrated "net kook's" for a harassed victim of the media/mi5 is not something "Deca" or i for that matter would find amusing given the size of thread/content regarding electronic mind control harassment etc

It has to said that the aggrevation etc of a third party looking in to this subject is placed pretty far away from the actual victim who's life must be hard to get by suffering from media harassment by the accounts written by "Mike Corley"
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 07:35 PM   #58
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamweaver View Post
For what it's worth, the Mike Corley guy had mental health issues and was on meds. He openly acknowledged this with people who met him - but he was adamant that his issues were unrelated to his condition.

But having said that, mind control and electronic harassment are real issues - and it does seem a bit off that the OP chose to mention you as a pretext for starting a thread about the Corley case.
The points that u state are indeed very ambiguous although suffering from harassment that is quite isolated as mind control electronic harassment to pass judgement from terms written without meeting them personal can seem harsh to say the least.

could i ask how you yourself would react if poised in the position of "Mike Corley" by all means this is only for the benefit of other Ti's such as Deca etc
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-2012, 07:37 PM   #59
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
no the person who started this thread i believe used the "Mike Corley" case as a strawman to discredit mind control & electronic harrassement victims
There is no discredit to any form of victimization this is something that no one should have to deal with.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-2012, 08:21 AM   #60
paz98
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordavoid View Post
Is it possible that the culprit/media would want to cover up the issue using comedy, although i do vaguely remember reading that "Corley Radio" is in no way affiliated with "Mike Corley" the individual.
Yes...this is called 'character assasination'. He became a joke; so his claims of targetting and harrassment become void, then the whole issue gets thrown aside.

In my experience the TV media do 'talk-back'. They have a feedback.

Why have you got a greater interest in Mike Corley? If you don't mind me asking. Are you a TI?
__________________
paz98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
harassment, media, mike corley

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.