Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Big Brother / Microchipping / Problem-Reaction-Solution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28-01-2012, 06:28 PM   #1
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Exclamation Mike Corley MI5 Persecution case media harassment

After much debate on the "mind control electronic harassment" thread originally posted by forum member "DECA" i have been forced to start a new chapter to highlight the "mike corley" media manipulation/victimization case that is wide spread on the internet.

To discuss the issue and further educate one-another on the media harassment embargo.

Last edited by fordavoid; 28-01-2012 at 10:10 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 06:34 PM   #2
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Some background information regarding "Mike Corley"

it seems to me that they may have try'd to cover the story up using comedy?....what do u think?

Mike Corleys http://www.mi5.com/usenet/usenet.htm

containing detailed accounts of the harassment

Last edited by fordavoid; 28-01-2012 at 10:53 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 06:35 PM   #3
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

I just like to point out I don`t know who fordavoid is, or firmula with the Mike Corley case or want to be associated with ether


please feel free to tell us about Mike Corley case and discuss it here

thanks bye
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 06:36 PM   #4
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

As you maybe aware the case has been going for some time pre millennia and should be a firm starting point to direct oneself in the tragic events of media harassment/victimization
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 06:42 PM   #5
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
I just like to point out I don`t know who fordavoid is, or firmula with the Mike Corley case or want to be associated with ether


please feel free to tell us about Mike Corley case and discuss it here

thanks bye
Please Deca you have made it quite clear that this type of mind control and Persecution case is none substantial to your knowledge, also i would like to hyper link to the the topic in the thread titled mind control and electronic harassment
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthrea...t=617&page=410

Last edited by fordavoid; 28-01-2012 at 06:44 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 09:37 PM   #6
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I might add that at the time of the "Mike Corley" case, the information on advanced surveillance equipment was minute giving the general public cause to concern regarding the situations "mike" was proclaiming

Last edited by fordavoid; 28-01-2012 at 09:38 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 09:52 PM   #7
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

read this quite shocking to believe this goes on in todays society using your tax money
http://www.jaylenoshow.info/mi5-pers...wsgroups-20377

Contained infomation

MI5-Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (20377)
Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups
For approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution, from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would simply go away
of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ
against bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go away and victimize someone else.
Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they continued to follow me wherever I went, they
continued to induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by ever
more extreme forms of abuse.
Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had had
accounts with internet providers in Ontario, Canada. I discovered the
cornucopia of internet newsgroups, on every topic from consumer
electronics, to politics and legal topics, and I discovered online
services such as Compuserve and AOL. In May 1995, I made the first posting
to the conspiracy newsgroup, on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame".
BBC’s Hidden Shame
The internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached its fourth
anniversary, started with an article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce
here.
Date: Thu May 4 18:27:24 1995
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: BBC’s Hidden Shame
Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell’s 1984? The ones which watched you
back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned down?
Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into
the world after him. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their
own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the
transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate their "victim".
And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do is not even illegal – the
UK has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment
or abuse except in the case of racial abuse.
A lot of people in England know this to be going on, yet so far they have maintained
perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into the English press, and for
all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain.
Have the British gone mad? I think we should be told
At this point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was still unsure
that they were the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In
followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors have never
denied the claim; so I think my guess is valid. (The Security Service
Tribunal in 1997 have said "no determination in your favour was made", but
it is a well established fact that MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal
which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can be
drawn from this.)
This first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were made to
the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and
uk.politics (which is now called uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried
to take the battle to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now
called UKCURRENT – current affairs), but my articles were censored by the
forum operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups.
Police Refuse to Act
I have complained several times to the Metropolitan Police, who have each
time refused to help.
From: Green
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.cultu re.british
Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren’t the British Police Doing Their
Job?
Reply-To: Gr…@guidion.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996
In article
bu…@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes:
>Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to
>an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn’t provide tangible
>evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and
>without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to
>take the complaint seriously.
This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill
operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael
Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something
that cannot go to court.
I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if
they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from
anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already,
because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general
pecking order.
If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would
show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant
with only five years to go before he retires doesn’t want to start fucking about with
somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the
lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss
off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his
boss and getting him a bollocking.
In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying
about the enemy of your enemies.
Most recently, I wrote in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station
CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my letter. When I phoned them
up, the detective Id written to treated me to a sadly not unusual display
of police bigotry, with an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish".
It would be nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something other
than wholly typical of police behaviour, but unfortunately that is an
illusion that is rapidly dispelled.
Uncorruptible Jon Snow of Channel Four News
From previous articles the reader will know what I think Jon Snow has
recently been watching me while he reads Channel Four News in the
evening. Recently I digitized a few moments of one such broadcast, where
his face twists into a smile, without there being anything in the news
broadcast to cause merriment. Here is a usenet post from some time ago on
MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called "free" press.
Peter Harding (hard…@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote:
: I was at speakers’ corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing
: about something or other, I don’t know what, but one thing he said to
: someone caught my ear:
: "BBC, MI5, same thing."
Can’t disagree with that sentiment.
Wasn’t it documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters?
I remember reading a report by some jouralist who had been offered an extra
tax-free income by MI5 to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused.
………………………………………………………………… ..
> : >mouthpiece, and had refused.
> :
> : It was Jon Snow of Channel 4.
> Was it reported in any of the papers?
It has been reported several times. The most recent was in Private Eye,
a few months back. As I recall they also wanted information from him;
journalists would be a natural choice for members of the Security Service
and the Secret Intelligence Service for information sources.
> It might be interesting to see what he had to say regarding their
> attempt to recruit him.
He was most concerned that many others would have accepted such an
offer. However, we can probably make an educated guess as to some of
those who accepted: Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher
would come near to the top of the list.

\/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum pro
magnifico.
British Elections and Politics at
http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html
I wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May ’97
The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4,
UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125.
Corrupt Security Service agents steal millions from taxpayers
Money is of course a factor in the grand equation which is the MI5
persecution. It costs money for the Security Service to "buy" people in
the media etc. But that is only a small part of their expenditure of
taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure is directly on the salaries
if the agents involved; and in this post I put forward the theory that MI5
are trying to draw out their involvement for as long as possible, very
cynically, to maximise their income and line their own pockets.
At each stage they have tried to pretend that I am something out of the ordinary.
Either I was very stupid ("he’s an idiot") or very clever ("he’s like a genius").
Either I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next
Hitler) or I was completely defenceless ("a soft toy").
Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of the
ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I am racially white
European, and there are plenty of other people with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there
who haven’t been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me?
I think the answer is that the MI5 agents who harass me have cynically exploited the
situation by painting me as extraordinary in order to assure themselves of well-paid
employment funded by the ordinary British taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are
stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to feed their own pockets.
This assertion is supported by the observation that it’s the same agents who are doing
the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital I was harassed by someone whose face
I had seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I just thought it
was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a couple of
years ago. It’s presumably been the same people most of the time. I’ve seen the way
contractors act when they don’t want their positions terminated. Would these agents
really want to lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are
promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have been for
the last seven years, while all the while these MI5 agents skim millions
off the taxpayer.
I wouldn’t mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like
standing in front of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I’d get
a slice of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current
Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not think of a single
case where the Tribunal had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my
usenet post from two years ago.
Subject: MI5: "It wasn’t us"
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.legal
Organization: Toronto Free-Net
"The Security Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have
asked me to inform you that no determination in your favour has been made on
your complaint."
Signed ER Wilson, Tribunal Secretary
Well that’s a relief then. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if
they say they’re not doing it then it can’t be them, can it?
In a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal
were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in the face of MI5
falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make another complaint to the
Tribunal in the near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a
toothless watchdog.
Discrimination against a Unit Minority
MI5 have been very clear in their instructions as to what I should
do. They have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also from the
other abuse it is clear that they want my existence terminated.
This point is covered in more detail in a previous article. The following
post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against me. They
have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority, yet they make use of
the discrimination against the mentally ill which is a feature of current
British society.

Last edited by fordavoid; 28-01-2012 at 10:01 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2012, 10:07 PM   #8
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

The question is this the work of the mi5?

Why would a security unit as large as the mi5 be involved in such a small case?

Leading to the question who else would/could be using the
Code:
media and mind control electronic harassment
techniques to victimize "Mike Corley" and many others like this ?

Last edited by fordavoid; 29-01-2012 at 07:24 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2012, 12:56 AM   #9
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Here is a song; dedicated to "Mike Corley"

This in no way affiliated with the lyrics originally wrote by Arrested Development;


Here have a dollar
in fact now brotherman here have two
two dollars means a snack for me
but it means a big deal to you
be strong serve god only
know that if you do beautiful heaven awaits
that's the poem i wrote for the first time
i saw a man with no cloths, no money, no plate
MIKE CORLEY, that's his name
no one ever knew his name cuz he's a know one
never thought twice about spending on an old bum
until i had the chance to really get to know one
now that i know 'em to give him money isn't charity
he gives me some knowledge, i buy him some shoes
and to think blacks spend all their money on big colleges
still most of you come out confused
go ahead MIKE CORLEY
go ahead MIKE CORLEY

MIKE CORLEY has freedom
a free that you and i think he's dumb
free to be without the worries of a quick to diss society
for MIKE CORLEY's a bum
his only worries are sickness and occasional harassment
by the police and their chase
uncivilized we call him but i just saw him
eat off the food we waste
civilization, are we really civilized
yes or no, who are we to judge
when thousands of innocent man could be brutally enslaved and killed over a racist grudge
MIKE CORLEY has tried to warn us about our ways
but we don't hear him talk
it's not his fault when we're goin' too far and we got too far
cuz on him we walk
MIKE CORLEY, a man, a human in flesh, but not by law
i feed you dignity to stand with pride
realize now that all in all we stand tall
go ahead MIKE CORLEY


This in no way dismisses the severity of this issue.

Last edited by fordavoid; 29-01-2012 at 01:03 AM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2012, 01:16 AM   #10
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

a write up from what seems to be another victim:

NAME: JOHAN HELLER
Citizenship: Sweden
Year Torture/Abuse Began: 1999
Email: [email protected]
DEAR SIR/MADAM
I SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE AND ABUSE USING DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS
I would like to draw your attention to some extreme and horrendous criminality being conducted with the involvement of United States Government-related Agencies and the complicity, if not participation, of many other governments, security agencies and/or shadowy organizations - involving the use of DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS on defenceless people.
I can confirm that the technical abilities and powers to:-
1. place a human subject under continuous surveillance, no matter where he/she is, from remote locations.
2. continuously monitor a human brain from remote locations, including thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event and visual image reading
3. continuously input directly into a human brain from remote locations, including the ability to override, control and alter consciousness, and to introduce voices, noises, other disturbances, images and “dreams” into the brain
4. directly interfere with, abuse, torture and hit bodies - including performing advanced medical procedures - and objects - from remote locations
5. directly interfere with, alter, insert etc. data, files, communications and legal evidence from remote locations - even during transmission
6. make live TV, and other screens and monitors, two-way – for surveillance, invasion of privacy etc..
7. control the flow of information and orchestrate the media – worldwide.
ARE ALREADY IN EXISTENCE AND ARE ALREADY BEING ABUSED!
There is massive ignorance and secrecy regarding this, and victims such as I are being subjected to uncontrolled and unacknowledged torture and mental and physical destruction. This has remained completely unreported and undiscussed publicly. There are many others, all over the world, who are being subjected to similar torture and abuse – some of us are being subjected to the most extreme
and totalitarian violations of human rights in human history.
As well as being inhumane and criminal the crimes being committed against us are contrary to the Principles and Values of all the major religions and ethical systems - and yet our appeals for justice, protection, assistance and/or publicity to Government Representatives, Government Officials, Government Agencies, International Organizations, Human Rights Organizations, Universities,
Scientific and other Institutions, and the International Media have been almost completely ignored and/or suppressed.
For anyone at all concerned about human rights, liberty, democracy, privacy, the rule of law and ALL aspects and degrees of human freedom, individuality and mental and physical integrity and health this uncontrolled and unacknowledged technology and torture and abuse is intolerable!
Your attention and assistance is urgently needed to halt these atrocities, control and regulate the use of these technologies, and to bring these extremist elements to justice.
Please assist urgently.

passage taken from here:

http://emftorturechamber.blogspot.co...pons_3558.html

Last edited by fordavoid; 29-01-2012 at 01:17 AM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2012, 02:16 PM   #11
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

more info regarding mike corley this is dated pre millennia 1996 so the information on surveillance technology was limited;



M'I`5 Persecutio n (use2) - Fitted up 26/4/96
Subject: Re: MI5? Please can. someone explain what's going on here?
Newsgroups:. uk.misc
References:. <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Organization: Toronto.
Distribution:
..
David Stretch. ([email protected]) wrote:
: In. article ,
: Iain L M Hotchkies . wrote:
: >The (remote) possibility remains that. 'Mike Corley' is either
:. >not schizophrenic (but is 'pretending' to be so) or 'he' is
: >a product of. a number of persons (?psychology students).
..
: Given other ways in which I. have seen people exploit some of The Internet's
: capabilities to disrupt or indulge in sophistry, or to exploit a. medium
: that resembles speech without the non-verbal and intonation. cues, etc
: as a means of. denigrating others, I question your use, albeit in quotes,
: of the word "remote". I'm not. saying it isn't remote and therefore it is
: great, I'm just saying that I don't think we can easily classify it. as
:. remote, moderate, or great.
..
I. think you can build up quite a good picture based on what someone says
and on their posting patterns. I don't. think "The Internet" (capitals, no
less) is as opaque a. medium as you make it out to be.
..
: It is not easy. to determine the validity of all information on The
: Internet without making use of extra supplementary. information.
..
: We do have the problem, pointed out by. someone else, of the possibly
: "too perfect". textbook characteristics of what is being posted.
..
I. explained that one, but I don't mind explaining it again (you don't
mind having. it explained again to you, do you now?). The reason my
"symptoms" are such a perfect fit to. the textbook is because the people
causing the campaign "fitted me up" in such a way that what. they did
would resemble. the symptoms of schizophrenia. Hence TV, radio, other
media, people in the streets etc. By a. fortunate coincidence (for them)
these mthods of harassment. are the ones which offer easiest channels of
access (for. them).
..
It's really quite neat. All it takes is for people. to start believing
that. the "symptoms" aren't symptoms but reality, though, and the house of
cards collapses in a heap. And there. are _lots_ of people now who knoiw
full well what has. gone on.
..
: If harrassment by email,. etc, has happened by someone out of the country,
: can a complaint be made. that results in arrest or whatever upon that
: person's entry into the country? An interesting point. which Mike may be
: able to inform us about, as he's said he will be. in the UK in a few weeks
:. time.
..
Picture the scene at the. airport;
"I arrest you for being. Mike Corley and mailbombing people"
..
"But my name isn't Corley. Who he? Mailbombing isn't illegal is it?. You'd
have to lock up a lot of. people if sending annoying email was a crime"
..
"Er....."
..
:. --
: David Stretch: Greenwood. Institute of Child Health, Univ. of Leicester, UK.
: [email protected] Phone:+44 (0)116-254-6100 Fax:+44. (0)116-254-4127
================================================== ======================

: context-free parts. of articles, conversations and things-on-the-TV and
: assume they are meant for you. Mike,. this is called paranoia.
..
But that's. the way real abuse works, too. People interject words and
phrases into what they say which they know will have meaning for. the listener.
..
And sometimes, they make it obvious. The very first evening. of my job in
Oxford, we went for a drink. with the technical director, and a couple
of. other employees. The TD said in an "as-if" aside to one of the others,
"Is this the bloke who's been. on TV?" (he said it directly in front of
me, and obviously meant mke to hear him saying. it). The other person
replied, "Yes,. I think so".
..
I think the subtext. of what the TD said was "Why are they bothering with
him? He's so insignificant, why would they possibly want to. spend the
resources going after him and putting. all that expensive technology in
his home, when. there must be much better targets?". The Technical
Director was given. to sometimes disrespecting people, you see, and in my
case. he couldn't see the point of anyone expending money on harassing me.

================================================== ==================

Subject: Re:. Treatment of Schizophrenia
Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics,alt.politics.british
Followup-To:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics,alt.politics.british
References:. <[email protected]>
Organization: Toronto. Free-Net
Distribution:
..
Illtud. Daniel ([email protected]) wrote:
: Probably 'cos you come. across as reasoned & articulate, it's a pity
: about. the other stuff
..
Veracity is. so unreasonable.
..
: >>pps. You should still. see a doc again Mike.
:. >
: >Doing so. Trouble is, all this mental-illness stuff provides. camouflage
:. >for the harassment, which is real. It alows people who otherwise would
: >consider the harassment seriously to disregard it.. It makes conversations
: >with a. lawyer or police brief when otherwise it would merit discussion.

: The point is that there. are two possibilities happening here-
..
: 1. There's a large conspiracy of. people out to get you, for no
: other reason than that they have the. means to do so, and that
: it involves a lot of the Media &. a proportion of the public
..
: 2. You (who admit to having. some headspace problems) are suffering
: from acute paranoid. schizophrenia.
..
:. Possibility #1 is _possible_, but would be unprecendented (OTOH,
: how would we know?), unfeasible, and many other things. beginning
: with _un_ which I can't think of at. the moment. Besides, if there
: was something going. on, chances are some of us here would know
:. about it, and I'm convinced that nobody does.

"Unprecedented" hits. the nail on the head. It _is_ unprecedented, but we
have only just. reached the technical stage at which it is feasible, and
we know video-spying is done to other people (NB the. Diana-Hewitt
episode) and is a routine. tool of security agencies.
..
Perhaps what. is unprecedented is not the technical side, but the social
manipulation of. many people by a concealed element in what other
countries would be called the secret police.. The most disturbing element
is the. degree to which people allow themselves to be unquestioningly
manipulated by an. evil element within the state.
Date:Sat, 30 Apr 2005 07:59:08 -0400 (EDT) Author:


taken from here;

http://www.myreader.co.uk/message/582060.aspx

Last edited by fordavoid; 29-01-2012 at 09:20 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2012, 07:14 PM   #12
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordavoid View Post
"Unprecedented" hits. the nail on the head. It _is_ unprecedented, but we
have only just. reached the technical stage at which it is feasible, and
we know video-spying is done to other people (NB the. Diana-Hewitt
episode) and is a routine. tool of security agencies.
..
Perhaps what. is unprecedented is not the technical side, but the social
manipulation of. many people by a concealed element in what other
countries would be called the secret police.. The most disturbing element
is the. degree to which people allow themselves to be unquestioningly
manipulated by an. evil element within the state.
Date:Sat, 30 Apr 2005 07:59:08 -0400 (EDT) Author:


This quote now has the firm evidence that the tech was available at the time of "Mike Corleys" first accounts, through the thread titled "mind control electronic harrasment" located here;

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=617

Last edited by merlincove; 30-01-2012 at 07:37 AM. Reason: corresponding?
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2012, 07:27 PM   #13
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

This thread and information has no affiliation with the Press Complaints Commission.

Last edited by fordavoid; 29-01-2012 at 09:21 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:25 PM   #14
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordavoid View Post
To pronounce my forum membership name incorrect in what seems to be on purpose given the amount of regular postings of mine, leads me to believe you either dont take this forum serious or don't have any respect for the issue contained in this thread by deca and the more regular updated, important informational thread found here;

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=198806


The way u have victimized myself on this thread, also leads me to be more vigilant towards internet correspondence and question the authenticity of your self and long standing members such as deca who couldn't wait to off load the "mike corley" case to another thread

look are you "mike corley" ???

there are people on here who have there own first hand experience off mind control & electronic harassment ....they don`t need to post & past somebody else's they found on the internet .

i not going to get in to a debate about somebody else's experience via a 3rd party especially one that's not declared there motives or behaved like you have , you insists that we should is disrespectful to our own experience ..

I don`t know mike corley or that he claims to be a mind control & electronic harassment or that he is part of the community to expose this ether

in fact are you a victim? part of TI community ? why are you here on this thread demanding things?

Quote:
off load the "mike corley" case to another thread
I have no reason to talk about the "mike corley" i don`t know anything about it or want to waste my time researching it ....it would be counter-productive and not presently what I doing ...i am into my own case and setting up scanning for implants and working networking with other Victims hence why I rather you...start your own thread to talk about "mike corley" and not bring me or this thread into it.

look psychological warfare "media feedback" is easy to avoid...you just turn off the tv avoid the traditional media this film explains this(think about it many people these days do a look for alternative media source)

ultrascience @ mind control 1/2


but what TI cliam and why its different from what "mike corley" does is we are having things broadcast direct to our brains & nervous system (with/without implant) that's a big difference

which is more explain in part 2

ultrascience @ mind control 2/2


if you had truly approached the matter correctly and respectively I would of been supportive and added to your thread ...i have come across plenty on how you can embed subliminal in music especially at shopping malls, TV/computer images etc...
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:28 PM   #15
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

Mind Control - The Hidden Effects Of Television On The Brain

Quote:
Mind Control - The Hidden Effects Of Television On The Brain
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:34 PM   #16
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

How Television Effects The Brain Part 1


How Television Effects The Brain Part 2
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:40 PM   #17
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deca View Post
look are you "mike corley" ???

there are people on here who have there own first hand experience off mind control & electronic harassment ....they don`t need to post & past somebody else's they found on the internet .

i not going to get in to a debate about somebody else's experience via a 3rd party especially one that's not declared there motives or behaved like you have , you insists that we should is disrespectful to our own experience ..

I don`t know mike corley or that he claims to be a mind control & electronic harassment or that he is part of the community to expose this either

in fact are you a victim? part of TI community ? why are you here on this thread demanding things?



I have no reason to talk about the "mike corley" i don`t know anything about it or want to waste my time researching it ....it would be counter-productive and not presently what I doing ...i am into my own case and setting up scanning for implants and working networking with other Victims hence why I rather you...start your own thread to talk about "mike corley" and not bring me or this thread into it.

look psychological warfare "media feedback" is easy to avoid...you just turn off the tv avoid the traditional media this film explains this(think about it many people these days do a look for alternative media source)

ultrascience @ mind control 1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL5K8xcLC4Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL5K8xcLC4Q


but what TI cliam and why its different from what "mike corley" does is we are having things broadcast direct to our brains & nervous system (with/without implant) that's a big difference

which is more explain in part 2

ultrascience @ mind control 2/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaAtE...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaAtE...eature=related


if you had truly approached the matter correctly and respectively I would of been supportive and added to your thread ...i have come across plenty on how you can embed subliminal in music especially at shopping malls, TV/computer images etc...

Can i just say that this thread will serve as a solid foundation to anyone wanting more knowledge on the subject regarding "Mike Corley" and also the on going harassment and victimization of the media including the internet.


Please your negativity only leads me to believe that you don't take this situation seriously although you yourself do believe that mind control and electronic harassment does exist in this day and age would you agree?

Are you here to tell me and the other viewing members that the media are not involved in this matter?
Even with detailed accounts from long standing victim "Mike Corley" and others?

Last edited by fordavoid; 30-01-2012 at 01:11 PM.
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:48 PM   #18
fordavoid
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 97
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default


Look the accounts of "Mike Corley" do contest that the harassment is much more isolated and sinister than flicker rate and other electronic issues etc, he talks about human participation e.g "the actual presenters wording and behaviour"
fordavoid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 12:51 PM   #19
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordavoid View Post
Can i just say that this thread will serve as a solid foundation to anyone wanting more knowledge on the subject regarding "Mike Corley" and also the on going harassment and victimization of the media including the internet.


Please your negativity only leads me to believe that you don't take this situation seriously although you yourself do believe that mind control and electronic harassment does exist in this day and age would you agree?

Are you here to tell me and the other viewing members that the media are not involved in this matter?
Even with detailed accounts from long standing victim "Mike Corley" and others?

look mind control is rather ambiguous term

the context you use it to regards "Mike Corley" is via known media delivery system TV/RADIO again I think there a lot of evidence that these mediums can be used in propaganda (information control) thus mind control
the only controversy is I believe is that "Mike Corley" was cliam he was getting personal/individualised harassment via these mediums


that is total completely different context to what I and other TI`s (mind control & electronic harassment)
claim when we talk about mind control & electronic harassment
mainly our brain and nervous system is directly targeted via microwaves/RF/EMF etc with or without an implant
we don`t need to be sat in-front of a TV or listening to a radio to be effected big difference


your blurring off this does nothing for us or infact "Mike Corley" it just confuses people that reads this
what i rather suspect is your real intention is
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/

Last edited by deca; 30-01-2012 at 12:55 PM.
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2012, 01:10 PM   #20
deca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 19,285
Likes: 1,071 (727 Posts)
Default

Stop Neuromarketing!

Quote:
Sign the petition...

http://www.worldbusiness.org/index.php?id=1348

Corporations and political candidates are using MRIs, EEGs, and other brain-scan technology to craft irresistible media messages designed to shift buying habits, political beliefs, and voting patterns.

By measuring activity in different parts of the brain in response to an ad or other media message, advertisers and political consultants can create advertising campaigns that tap into the pre-conscious brain.

This form of marketing, known as neuromarketing, undermines our core democratic values of freedom and self-determination.

We call upon Congress to hold hearings to investigate the commercial and political uses of neuromarketing so the public can learn which companies and political candidates are using neuromarketing research to manipulate consumers and voters choices.
__________________
It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction...Thus, it may be possible to 'talk' to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them."
United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
find out more website ==> https://decasfoxhole.wordpress.com/
deca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
harassment, media, mike corley

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.