Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Vaccinations / Big Pharma / Bio-Warfare

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-11-2014, 01:05 PM   #1
aronia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 203 (134 Posts)
Post Big pharma has an interest in people being sick

Big pharma has an interest in rich people being sick

What profit is there in a healthy population? If everyone were healthy, it would be the job of the pharmaceutical companies to persuade us that we were not well

Giles Fraser
The Guardian, Friday 17 October 2014 18.08 BST



A burial team with the body of an Ebola victim in Monrovia, Liberia. Photograph: Marcus DiPaola/NurPhoto/Rex



The giant pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline said yesterday that its work on a vaccine for Ebola will “come too late” to do anything about the current situation. Even now it is trying to compress trials that would normally take a decade into a year. The impression it gives is that it is working flat out, no holds barred. But hang on a moment. Ebola was discovered back in 1976. What has GlaxoSmithKline been doing since then? Answer: not much.

A small clue to why can be found by looking at the stock price of Tekmira Pharmaceuticals, the Canadian-based drugs firm that some investors seem to think is leading the pack on Ebola research. Tekmira shares rose a massive 180% from mid-July to October, with most of the share-price action coming when the virus jumped to Europe and the US.

Ebola has been killing people in central and western Africa for at least 38 years – but it’s only when the virus becomes a threat to the developed world that there is seen to be a profit in it. I know it sounds cynical to say it flat out like that – but it sounds cynical because it is. What business case is there for developing drugs to save the lives of poor Africans when they don’t have the money to pay for them? Especially when there is so much more profit to be had in – for instance – giving rich white men erections. As a study in last year’s Lancet showed, of the 336 new drugs developed in the first decade of this century, only four of them were for what are known in jargon as neglected tropical diseases – three for malaria and one for diarrhoea.

The point being this: the business model of market-driven big (or even medium-sized) pharma does not work well to address the challenges posed by a virus that ultimately has no respect for geography or bank balance. Some of the developed world’s early interest in Ebola was in whether it could be weaponised. It was said that the Russian biological weapons unit – Biopreparat – had turned Ebola into an aerosol spray.

All of which is red meat for conspiracy theorists (like those who tell you that the patent for the Ebola virus is owned by the US government, which is true). But my suspicion is not about shady government actions but about basic capitalist economics. Isn’t it interesting that there is money about to ask scientists to turn a virus into a weapon, but not the money about to ask scientists to find a vaccine? And by the time there’s a market for a vaccine, it’s too late.

What better example of what is commonly called market failure – that state of affairs in which market forces do not make for desirable outcomes. Here’s another example: remember Nelson Mandela having to take on the big pharmaceutical companies as thousands of dying South Africans were unable to afford Aids drugs. Apparently, the market-driven economics of health care do not have an answer to a virus that begins in a part of the world where there isn’t much money. And that is often where dangerous viruses begin. Which is precisely why market forces will not be able to save us.

Indeed, on the contrary, market-driven healthcare is incentivised to keep us sick. For what profit is there in a healthy population? If everyone were healthy, it would be the job of the pharmaceutical companies to persuade us that we were not well, that certain things about us needed fixing, putting right (even if they didn’t).

Its a bit like Friedrich Nietzsche’s criticism of the Christian priest: that the priest first has to poison us into imagining we are unwell – and thus in need of saving – before he can present himself as the cure, as salvation. There is no market for salvation in a sinless world. Of course, big pharma presents itself as evidence-based and scientific. Not at all like Nietzsche’s Christianity. But it’s not the science that calls the tune. It is the stock price. And the stock price goes up when rich people feel threatened.


Last edited by aronia; 09-11-2014 at 01:06 PM.
aronia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 04:37 PM   #2
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

An Xcellent thread!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 05:46 PM   #3
blue2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: On a Superhuman Planet
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 90 (63 Posts)
Default

It goes without saying really about Big Pharma and Dr's having a vested interest in il health i've known it for two decades. I don't go near Dr's and best thing is to keep ones immune system healthy and not eating and drinking crap fast foods see on www.naturalnews.com Raw juicing is best thing of veges and fruits including white onion and strong garlic and pref buy veges like carrots at farm shops rather than mass produced supermarket stuff that is under lights all the time.
blue2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2014, 08:24 PM   #4
pri01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,089
Likes: 92 (50 Posts)
Default

I worked as a sales rep for a few big pharma companies and the aggressiveness of their marketing and sales targeting was an eye opener for me.

They are working on products 10 years in advance and as such they have good inside information on the type and volume of diseases that their products will treat in the future.

The drugs that earn them their bread and butter are those which the patient has to stay on for the rest of their lives. Diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, asthma etc. are big business for them, and they all fight to gain the majority of the market share.
pri01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 12:17 AM   #5
reverendjim
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: canada
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 1,348 (822 Posts)
Default

the thread title tells the tale. the corporate wet dream.
reverendjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 12:23 AM   #6
reverendjim
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: canada
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 1,348 (822 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2 View Post
It goes without saying really about Big Pharma and Dr's having a vested interest in il health i've known it for two decades. I don't go near Dr's and best thing is to keep ones immune system healthy and not eating and drinking crap fast foods see on www.naturalnews.com Raw juicing is best thing of veges and fruits including white onion and strong garlic and pref buy veges like carrots at farm shops rather than mass produced supermarket stuff that is under lights all the time.
here's a salad i would swear by:
finely chopped onion
finely chopped garlic
chopped tomatoes
feta cheese

yummy just like that

but

you can add this mix to cooked ground beef or chicken or whatever. love it. but people might say "you stink". lol. so what
reverendjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 02:10 PM   #7
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,404
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reverendjim
the thread title tells the tale. the corporate wet dream.
Yes this really is a grand thread!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:11 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.