Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > The Global Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2011, 02:42 PM   #1
bernardofc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default The 1958 Takeover of the Catholic Church

The 1958 Takeover of the Catholic Church

There was coup d'etat in the Catholic Church on October 26th, 1958 and the Church has been governed by imposters since that time.

Is this really that important? In my opinion it is. The Catholic Church is the largest and oldest institution on earth with roughly a billion nominal members, roughly 3 times the population of the United States.

Since 1958 however, despite the numbers, the institution has been largely ineffective in combating the social ills they had so effectively handled for centuries. Abortion, pornography, divorce, obscenity all became prominent after the papal chair was usurped in 1958.

To demonstrate the power of the Church before this, look at the time when Pius XII excommunicated President Peron of Argentina in 1955 when he tried to contradict the constitution and allow divorce.

As a result of the excommunication, the populace of Argentina rose up and Peron was removed from office and Catholic teaching was upheld. Who would have thought that 50 years later Argentina would be legalizing “gay marriage.”

Also, for those familiar with Catholicism you may know that the original Mass, which can be traced back to the 4th century (but could very well be apostolic in origin), was abandoned in 1969 to make way for a "new mass," A ceremony that bears little resemblance to the traditional Mass. Again, who would want to destroy the sacred rite but an enemy agent masquerading as Pope.

Part 8 The Destruction of the Mass
To find out why the “Catholic” Church of today has become a sick caricature of the Catholic Church of two millennia we have to look back to the papal conclave of 1958. I believe the documentary posted below will provide the key to understanding what has happened.

At the center of the film is the election of the conservative prelate, Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, in 1958. What you will see in this section is a very clear emission of white smoke from the Sistine Chapel 2 days before the election of John XXIII. On this night 200,000 people turned to the balcony to see the new pope emerge on the balcony while news reports went out around the world that a new pope had been elected.

Vatican radio later announced that the white smoke was a mistake and that no Pope had been elected. In this section you will also hear the testimony of an FBI Consultant that claims there are FBI and State Department files which state that on this night Cardinal Siri was elected Pope and took the name Gregory XVII. In addition, former papal advisor Father Malachi Martin gives his testimony that Cardinal Siri was elected and was put under duress in at least 2 if not 3 conclaves. This is the centerpiece of the film (part 4) which is about 10 minutes
Looking at one incident, however, does not give one the perspective they need to see that the church has been hijacked. The very clear signal that a pope had been elected 2 days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony is very suspicious, but in itself does not provide enough reason to believe that the Chair of Peter was stolen. To arrive at a clear conclusion on this, one must take several things into account.

Historical Precedents

The papacy does get usurped. In the history of the Catholic Church the papacy has been usurped more than 40 times, which is easily verifiable by getting a list of anti-popes. In the movie we highlight the case of Innocent II who was elected pope and then forced to flee by an imposter pope, Anacletus II. Anacletus II ruled for 8 years until his death, upon which, Innocent ascended to the papal throne many years late. Anacletus and all the clergy ordained by him were then condemned at the second Lateran Council.

The Men Who Took Over

The men who took office instead of Cardinal Siri, namely John XXIII ( Angelo Roncalli) and Paul VI (Giovanni Montini) we’re more just bad apples.

JOHN XXIII

John XXIII’s Masonic initiation is described in detail in Pier Carpi’s book the “The Prophecies of John XXIII” and there is a vast amount of evidence and testimony that he was indeed a Mason. For this alone he would be ipso facto excommunicated and obviously ineligible for the Papacy. Upon his election, he immediately made Montini (future Paul VI) a Cardinal and called the Second Vatican Council, two of the most disastrous decisions in the history of the Catholic Church.

He also received Nikita Khrushchev’s son-in-law and daughter at the Vatican in a private meeting, this is after communist regimes around the world murdered and imprisoned millions of Catholics. The well publicized meeting earned an extra million votes for the communist party in Italy in the national elections. John XXIII also began introducing changes to the Mass, changes that would culminate in the complete destruction of the Tridentine Latin Mass under Paul VI.

Part 5 Who was John XXIII?
Paul VI

Paul VI, who never spent so much as a day a parish priest before becoming Pope, enjoyed reading books by Oscar Wilde during his seminary days. This wouldn’t seem so bad if it weren’t for the multiple public accusations of sodomy against him that emerged during and after his pontificate. If this wasn’t bad enough, ex-member of the Vatican noble guard, Franco Bellegrandi recounts in his book Nikita Roncalli that Pius XII conducted a secret investigation and found out that Montini, then secretary of state, was providing names of priests operating behind the iron curtain to the Soviet secret police. The priests were then shot or sent to the gulag.

Part 7 Who was Paul VI?
Indeed these two men were not simply “bad popes,” nor did they become pope and then lose their faith. They were enemy agents who set the Church on a carefully designed plan to destruction.
Once the treachery of these two men has been established, the 3 week period between the death of Pius XII (a true pope) and the so-called election of John XXIII (an imposter) become crucial. Did anything significant happen between these two dates? Yes, there was a five minute signal indicating a pope had been elected billowing out of the Sistine Chapel two days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony in St. Peter’s Square. Was the true pope elected on this night, and was he Cardinal Siri? I’ll point to three sources that say this is exactly what happened.

Paul L. Williams

FBI informant Paul Williams in his book The Vatican Exposed quotes State department files that state Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected and took the name Gregory XVII on Sunday October 26th but the French Cardinal annulled the results .

Fr. Malachi Martin

Fr. Malachi Martin in an interview in the late nineties says that Siri got enough votes to become Pope but refused the office because he thought they would not let him live.

Fr. Charles-Roux

Father Charles-Roux claims that Joseph Cardinal Siri of Genoa had been elected and also accepted the Papal office, but a very serious threat was delivered by the dean of the College of Cardinals (Cardinal Tisserant) and that Siri was immediately shoved aside, without actually abdicating.

Here we have three individuals claiming that Cardinal Siri was elected and was subject to some kind of threat. This along with Cardinal Siri’s indirect admissions (twice) that he was elected pope make a very good case that the person who was elected when the white smoke emerged on October 26th, 1958, was Cardinal Giuseppe Siri of Genoa.

Furthermore there is a great deal of evidence that Cardinal Roncalli and the whole 1958 affair was planned by unholy forces, which is described in Part 3 of the film.

Part III The Chosen Candidate
Those who have trouble believing that Cardinal Siri was elected seem to want an admission from the forces of darkness who captured the papacy and a detailed explanation of how they did it. Others expect that Siri would come out and claim that he was pope, when obviously nobody would believe it, even if he did manage to get the word out before being eliminated.

Lastly, the film will give some basic instructions on how to find traditional churches, priests, catechisms, etc and give a word or two on activism.

Part XII The Underground Church
The film is otherwise broken down into 12 parts, the subject matter of each part described in the title.

Part 1 Historical Precedents Part 2 October 1958 Part 3 The Chosen Candidate Part 4 The 1958 Conclave Part 5 Who was John XXIII? Part 6 The 1963 Conclave Part 7 Who was Paul VI? Part 8 The Destruction of the Mass Part 9 Year of Two Conclaves Part 10 Cardinal Siri Confronted Part 11 Conclusion Part 12 The Underground Church
bernardofc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 02:48 PM   #2
john devine
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

subbed.
john devine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 05:36 PM   #3
dolores1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 14,891
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Angry I have no problem believing this

Or that John Paul 1st was murdered. That was when the Satanists took over and child sacrifice became almost the norm.
dolores1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 10:05 PM   #4
bernardofc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

John Paul I was almost definitely murdered, In God's Name is the most popular book however John Coleman has a white paper on it, as does FBI consultant Paul Williams.

John Paul I (Albino Luciani) might have been sincere but was not really Catholic. He had no intention of restoring the traditional Mass that had been used since at least the 4th century nor did he accept many of the Church's teachings, even suggesting that God was a woman. Furthermore, since Cardinal Siri was elected pope in 1958 and lived until 1989 he was the lawful Pope (though not the recognized pope) therefore Luciani's election is invalid and he can only be called an impostor, though he probably didn't know that he was.

I realize not everyone is Catholic but it is the largest and oldest organization on Earth, I believe the infiltration and takeover of this institution is just as important 911 the assassination of JFK or similar events and hoped to bring it to the attention of those who had lost their faith. There is a real Catholic Church out there with real priests and real sacraments but you find it by going to a mainline Catholic church.

Last edited by bernardofc; 04-05-2011 at 10:07 PM.
bernardofc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 11:01 PM   #5
dolores1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 14,891
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Default Posting avator and name?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bernardofc View Post
John Paul I was almost definitely murdered, In God's Name is the most popular book however John Coleman has a white paper on it, as does FBI consultant Paul Williams.

John Paul I (Albino Luciani) might have been sincere but was not really Catholic. He had no intention of restoring the traditional Mass that had been used since at least the 4th century nor did he accept many of the Church's teachings, even suggesting that God was a woman. Furthermore, since Cardinal Siri was elected pope in 1958 and lived until 1989 he was the lawful Pope (though not the recognized pope) therefore Luciani's election is invalid and he can only be called an impostor, though he probably didn't know that he was.

I realize not everyone is Catholic but it is the largest and oldest organization on Earth, I believe the infiltration and takeover of this institution is just as important 911 the assassination of JFK or similar events and hoped to bring it to the attention of those who had lost their faith. There is a real Catholic Church out there with real priests and real sacraments but you find it by going to a mainline Catholic church.


Is your posting name and lack of avator a signal? Like St. Bernard's and his fight against the Gnostics?

Last edited by dolores1; 04-05-2011 at 11:02 PM. Reason: omit
dolores1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 12:06 AM   #6
bernardofc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dolores1 View Post
Is your posting name and lack of avator a signal? Like St. Bernard's and his fight against the Gnostics?
Bernard of Clairveuax is who I had in mind. In 1138 he helped restore the papal throne to Innocent II after it had been usurped by Anacletus II.

I was too lazy to add an avatar. I'll get to it today.
bernardofc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 09:20 AM   #7
dolores1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 14,891
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Angry Kill them all, God will know his own!

Is he not the guy that made this statement "Kill them all, God will know his own"?

Last edited by dolores1; 05-05-2011 at 09:20 AM.
dolores1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 09:30 AM   #8
bernardofc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dolores1 View Post
Is he not the guy that made this statement "Kill them all, God will know his own"?
No that was another guy about 70 years later,the Abbot of Cîteaux. The quote is often attributed to St. Dominic.
bernardofc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 09:59 AM   #9
dolores1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Over the hill and round the bend
Posts: 14,891
Likes: 15 (13 Posts)
Default

Thanks for clearing this up for me.
dolores1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.