Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Exposing Child Abuse

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2013, 01:23 PM   #1
newjersey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 273
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Man who had 1,500 child sex pictures spared jail

A BLACKWOOD man was spared jail after being found with almost 1,500 indecent pictures of children.

Police raided the home of Adam Gibbons, 20, on August 9 last year after receiving information he was downloading indecent images of children.

When his house was searched, police found images on a USB stick, external hard drive, laptop and computer.

Newport Crown Court heard police found 1,499 indecent images of youngsters as young as ten; 931 were level one, 91 were level two, 299 were level three, 144 were level four and 34 were of the most severe category, level five.

Gibbons, of Canberra Close, Blackwood, admitted to police that he had downloaded the pictures for his own gratification over the past two years.

He pleaded guilty to 15 counts of making indecent images of children and one count of possession of indecent images of children.

Defending, Andrew Jones, said Gibbons gave a remarkably frank interview to police and said his pre-sentence report noted he had feelings of disgust in himself over what he had done, as well as losing his partner and his job.

The court heard that, following his appearance in magistrates’ court, vandals daubed the words 'paedo scum' on his family home.

Record Jeremy Jenkins said: "No-one, reading a synopsis of these images, could feel anything but utter revulsion, you are looking at abuse of children in the most vile way."

Gibbons was given a three-year community order for each offence, to be served concurrently, and told to attend the internet sexual offender’s programme. He was also disqualified from working with children for five years, ordered to sign on the sex offenders' register and given a sexual offences prevention order for the same period of time.

Recorder Jenkins said he was not imposing a prison sentence because the maximum length he could give, two years, would not be enough time for any treatment programmes to be successful.

His computer equipment will be forfeited and destroyed.

http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/new...s_spared_jail/

You really couldn't make this shit up could you.

Last edited by newjersey; 02-02-2013 at 01:23 PM.
newjersey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 04:59 PM   #2
emeraldgreen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 1 (1 Post)
Default

The lack of care demonstrated by increasing absence of appropriate action by the courts is disgraceful. Clearly there is a greater influence behind this than concern for the protection of children from paedophiles.
emeraldgreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 03:15 PM   #3
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 20,406
Likes: 1,436 (935 Posts)
Default

I thought they made this disgusting behaviour legal?? (I read a thread on this site) if so,thats THE REAL REASON!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.