Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > New World Order / Global Government

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24-02-2018, 04:06 PM   #1
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default The British World Order

"The British Empire was the nearest thing there has ever been to a world government" - From the book Empire: The rise and demise of the British World Order and the lessons for global power.

"A New Imperialism? Less than a month after the September 11th attacks, the British Prime Minister Tony Blair made a messianic speech to the Labour Party's annual conference at Brighton. In it he spoke with fervour of the politics of globalization of another dimension of international relations; of the need to re-order this world around us. The impending war to overthrow and replace the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, he suggested, was not the first step in the direction of such a re-ordering; nor would it be the last...

... In the aftermath of the attacks, Mr. Blair declared his desire for justice: Justice not only to punish the guilty. But justice to bring those same values of democracy and freedom to people round the world... The starving, the wretched, the dispossessed, the ignorant, those living in want and squalor from the deserts of Northern Africa to the slums of Gaza, to the mountain ranges of Afghanistan: they too are our cause.


Not since before the Suez Crisis has a British Prime Minister talked with such unreserved enthusiasm about what Britain could do for the rest of the world. Indeed, it is hard to think of a Prime Minister since Gladstone so ready to make what sounds remarkably like undiluted altruism the basis of his foreign policy. The striking thing, however, is that with only a little rewriting this could be made to sound an altogether more menacing project..." - From the book Empire: The rise and demise of the British World Order and the lessons for global power.

Last edited by snowleopard; 24-02-2018 at 04:11 PM.
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:14 PM   #2
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

"Most people think that America's struggle against the British Empire (and their global opium trading monopoly via the East India Company) ended after the American Revolution (1781); a few students of history might cite the cessation of battle after the war of 1812 in 1814. Fewer still realize that while the British Empire focused on subjugating the people of India through the 1800's, it still sought to recolonize America and bring it back into the Empire. While America expanded westward, the British Empire continued to fan the flames of re-colonization, mostly through the complicity of America's Eastern Establishment families (who had built their fortunes on the back of British East India Company opium trading), and aided by robber barons who considered themselves globalists or internationalists (recall David Rockefeller and his family's efforts) and found the notion of creating a world government to be attractive. This attempt to use American resources as a stepping-stone to global governance was foreseen by George Washington, who in his farewell address in 1796 mentions the tendency for power to corrupt the foundations laid by the founding fathers"

"By 1902 America was once again in the sights of an enemy, well-funded and fully-cloaked in the camouflage of an ally - an ally with a plan to recolonize America by changing the attitudes, values, behaviors and beliefs as the method of re-integration into the Empire"

"With the philosophic foundations of private property, self-reliance, and equal representation being eroded in generation after generation that passed through the Prussian Education System (in America), those who had designs on the re-colonization of America as a stepping-stone to world government, sharpened their pencils. A student of the British Empire, attending Oxford University, wrote down his plan for world domination on behalf of the Empire; his name was Cecil Rhodes. And what I can tell you from my experience is that if school children in America were taught about the life and legacy of Cecil Rhodes, freedom and liberty across the planet would be at much less risk of peril; and as a function of not being taught this story, individuals on every continent stand to lose freedom and liberty - possibly forever. One might even consider reading The Last Will and Testament of Cecil John Rhodes by William T. Stead published in 1902 upon Rhodes' death, as you progress in learning about this topic. What Cecil Rhodes set up was a strategy to re-colonize America; he took the existing desire to do so (on behalf of the British Empire which had desired to do so since 1781, but lacked a viable strategy), added money (Rhodes controlled De Beers diamond mines as well as gold mines in South Africa), a plan for a secret society (funded by Rhodes' Last Will Testament enacted in 1902), and a scholarship fund (Rhodes Scholarships) to ensure that his dream could become reality - without the consent of those to be governed by the effort. On the back of Rhodes' plan, America bonded with Britain through a very special relationship which brought the agenda to the fore, through a strategy of imperialism cloaked in democracy." - From the book New World Order: A Strategy Of Imperialism

Last edited by snowleopard; 24-02-2018 at 04:15 PM.
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:17 PM   #3
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

"After Rhodes' death in 1902, the Rhodes Scholarships were launched in accordance with Rhodes' Last Will and Testament; the British imperialists next formed an Anglo-American group called the Pilgrims Society in London and New York. Rhodes' plan was adopted by a wider Anglophile network, including several tax-exempt foundations (such as the Carnegie Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and later the Ford Foundation) as his acolytes (in favor of Rhodes' plan for Anglo-American Hegemony) took hold of the American reigns through the Woodrow Wilson presidency. They set up a private corporation called The Federal Reserve Bank (1913) to issue America's currency, and were instrumental in getting America into World War 1 (and World War 2 for that matter). They enabled and delivered Lenin and the Bolsheviks, presided over the Versailles Treaty, founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs (1919) and the Council on Foreign Relations (1921) and then proceeded to help finance and militarize the Nazis."

"We in America have a blind spot: we think that in order to learn the history of our country, we need only know about the Americans in that story - and that is a formidable error to contend with. As Sean demonstrates, until you understand the British angle of the story, you're not seeing the big picture. It means learning the names and history of the men left out of the American version of these stories. Aside from Cecil Rhodes and his benefactor Lord Rothschild, it's useful to know the following characters, in case you'd like to look them up before you embark on this line of study: Lord Alfred Milner, Lionel Curtis, L.S. Amery, Alfred Zimmern, William Yandell Elliott, Frank Aydelotte, Sir Edward Grey, Lord Halifax, and Lord Lothian... learning about them unveils this whole line of research, for their actions have determined the course of the 20th and thus far, the 21rst century. A new term, Democide, (or death of citizens by their own government) had to be coined just to describe how prolific the death tolls were from this group's activities and creations in the 20th century. The Democide Study conducted by Rudolph Rummel at the University of Hawaii in 1994 has been updated for the years 1900-1999, a time during which approximately 262 million citizens were killed at the hands of their own government. History's most evil mass-murderers (Germany's Hitler, Soviet Union's Lenin and Stalin, China's Mao, Cambodia's Pol Pot, et al.) were enabled, funded, and protected by the participants of the Rhodes agenda."

"A few interesting books the Anglophiles printed during the early 1900's - which are off the radar of most Americans, and which all just happen to point to the conversion of the British Empire to a World Government - using America as the stepping stone: The Pan Angles: A Consideration of the Federation of the Seven English-speaking Nations by Sinclair Kennedy (1915), The Third British Empire: Being a course of Lectures Delivered at Columbia University, New York by Alfred Zimmern (1934), and Civitas Dei: The Commonwealth of God (1934) by the utopian socialist and Rhodes group quarterback Lionel Curtis calling for World Government. On the shoulders of those ideas, the architects in charge of manifesting Rhodes' legacy published The City of Man: A Declaration on World Democracy in 1940, and Sean shines a spotlight on this book in particular by tracing the consequences of its ideology, which seeded a movement called World Federalism, and these ideas are still in full-force today." - From the book New World Order: A Strategy Of Imperialism
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:21 PM   #4
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

"There are also signs that there were few people within our own government during the past century who tried to call public attention to this story; in 1914 (and again in 1917 when America joined World War 1) in an article circulated titled "United States to be British: The Will of Cecil Rhodes," describing Rhodes' secret society, the goal of which was the Ultimate Recovery of the United States of America as an Integral Part in the British Empire. In the February 14th, 1917 edition of the New York Times, congressman Oscar Callaway of Texas warned the public why this important scheme to undermine America wasn't making it on their radar, citing the Rhodes plan in action: "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together twelve men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached: the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." If you think that quote is too bad to be true, here's what you need to search out for confirmation: Congressional Record of February 9, 1917, page 2947. Last but not least, there's the dozen of pages of testimony entered into the Congressional Record of the 76th Congress, Third Session by the Honorable J. Thorkelson of Montana on August 19, 1940, which opens with these words: "In order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining the Republic, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the RECORD a number of articles to prove this point. These articles are entited Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife."

....in this I include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled Triumphant Democracy. In this he expresses himself in this manner: "Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states - the British-American Union."

These public servants (Callaway, Thorkelson) were pointing accurately at the elephant in the living room, but without the press to disseminate these truths, you're possibly just now learning about this agenda to create world government by piggy-backing on America. That's why it was necessary to buy influence in twenty-five of the greatest newspapers in 1917, so you wouldn't know about this trend of neo-colonialism until now.

...the British Empire silently transformed from control of territory to more illusory stratagems for gaining total control of the planet's resources (both natural and human), such as using the cloak of corporate personhood to create multinational corporations which quietly usurp control of governments around the world. This plan then led to the origin of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund as well as the United Nations to set up the framework - or skeleton - for world government (a.k.a. globalism)." - From the book New World Order: A Strategy Of Imperialism
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:24 PM   #5
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

"The claim made in the book, Dope, Inc. is a provocative, almost outlandish one: It is that the British Crown has been at the top of the pyramid of the international drug trade since the days of the East India company. It is well known that Britain ruled both the slave trade and the Chinese opium trade through the East India Company for well over a century. But since then, London's control over the international drug trade has been more clandestine and certainly less well known.

One reason it has flown under the radar is that control over the trade was not consolidated until the end of prohibition. It was only then that the syndicated infrastructure used during prohibition -- to distill, transport and distribute alcohol -- was then converted over to an operation sophisticated enough to control the world wide drug trade. This top secret, top-down "British run syndicate," involved three hierarchically-ordered rings of power, all radiating downward from London.

The first ring is made up of trusted aides, including court Jews (known as Hofjudens, or house Jews), who, since the days of Feudalism have served the British Crown loyally as its preferred courtiers. In the drug trade, Hofjudens were among a group that also included high level military and intelligence operatives, who served as "cutouts" for sensitive operations. Their job was to establish the arrangements for the international drug trade, and to manage laundering drug monies, and then investing profits through European and American banks -- all to be done under the watchful eye of UK national security.

Among the Hofjudens discussed here are the Rothchilds, of England and France, the Brofmans of Canada, and Arnold Rothstein of the US. The Rothchild family had been engaged with the Crown in international finance, war industries and banking during both world wars, while the Brofman family and Rothstein, had run liquor for the Crown during prohibition.

The second ring of power included the use of Sicilian as well as Jewish mobsters to distribute drugs to street vendors and users. Foremost among members of this ring was Meyer Lansky and Lucky Luciano. The mob group jointly led by them, also had deep illicit ties with both the Crown and the USG -- first through liquor running that went as far back as prohibition, and later through the Navy during WW-II, up through gun-running both for Israel and for and against Castro's revolution -- after which, Lansky was summarily kicked out of Havana.

Right after the war, at the time Israel was being established, Lansky's drug trafficking routes doubled-down as gun-running routes, where both became indispensable in providing needed military and financial assistance in establishing Israel. Along with Lansky, the Hafjudens, that had been loyally to the Crown, were now deeply involved in running surplus weapons from European armories and American ships into Israel, as well as using drug profits to provide the much needed hard currency to finance the development of the new state of Israel. Ship loads of stockpiled Allied WW-II weapons, somehow, just managed to get diverted to Israel.

The third and final ring of power emanating out from the Crown, was the circle of power that involved aspiring politicians, those in a position to facilitate bringing drugs in through the front door of the countries where it was needed to be done.

This multi-layered structure was overseen and tightly insulated from public exposure by an intelligence blanket called the SOE. Through high level infiltration by British intelligence into both friendly and competing agencies, the UK was able to gain a foothold inside the KGB, the CIA, Division Five of the FBI, and similar organizations in the Caribbean, Mexico, Canada and Australia -- as well as in Israel -- where it helped set-up the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad.

A final most important aspect of this secret drug infrastructure, was a string of shell "business fronts" and safe houses, "cutouts," as it were, strategically placed to serve various needs, as necessary. One such business entity that first hit American newspapers during Jim Garrison's investigation into the JFK assassination, was the nefarious entity called Permindex.

Ostensibly, Permindex was to be the headquarters of world exhibition centers, but in fact, as this book claims, Permindex was little more than a "clearing house" for a group of about a dozen well-trained and well-paid assassins that made up the Crown's version of Murder, Inc. And while these authors claim that Permindex was used to carry out important hits at the behest of the crown, Michael Collins Piper's book, "Final Judgment," insinuates that Permindex was an Israeli, rather than a British creation? And further Piper, claims it was David Ben Gurion, who first resigned as Prime Minister, and then ordered JFK's murder in order to avoid having to allow the IAEA to inspect the Israeli nuclear facilities at Dimona?

I have read Piper's book carefully, checked his references, and am willing to admit that he is an honest scholar and has marshaled impressive documentation to back up his claims. However, in retrospect, it now seems quite clear too that he also used a bit of creative license: as he first "cribbed," and then "improvised," a wiggly path away from pinning the tail of the assassination donkey on Great Britain, where it belonged, and instead, pinned it on Israel?

The real story of this book thus is not just in providing the reader with the full history and associated details of this enormously powerful secret apparatus (often referred to elsewhere as "The Trust," or "The Octopus"), but it is also to give the reader a sense of just how powerful and all-encompassing this top-down drug syndicate really has been. The best examples of the use of its powers are presented as two "asides" to the main narrative of the book.

The first example is a novel explanation of why Nixon's "opening to China" was so successful: According to theses authors, it was because the skids were greased by (Hofjuden) Henry Kissinger's shuttle diplomacy (on behalf of the Crown rather than on behalf of USG in his role as Secretary of State), where it was agreed that the West would cover-up rather than expose the Communist Chinese leadership's long-term involvement in, and profits from, the British opium and heroin trade.

To say the least, and for all the obvious reasons, Kissinger went ballistics over the book's allegations generally, but particularly over its characterization of him as being an "in-house Royal Jew" and a "double agent" at the same time.

The second example is the assassination of JFK, which the book claims was simply an unfortunate instance in which the Kennedy family had used up its "get-out-of-trouble-free-cards," having once again run afoul of the rules of the game and the interests of the Crown, and thus suffered the expected consequences. The Kennedy's were heavily in debt to the crown as far back as when Joe Kennedy was running liquor for them during prohibition, before he was appointed Ambassador to England with the Crown's intervention, or was finally appointed to the job he would have died for, and the one that made him filthy rich: the first SEC Chairmanship.

The reader may recall that Joe was later recalled to Washington for running afoul of the Crown by gushing over Hitler and indiscrete public comments about the UK's chances of losing the war. Then, to add insult to injury, a generation later, the Kennedy sons screwed-up the Bay of Pigs invasion by not providing Air cover, threatened to abolish the Federal Reserve, went after the mob with a vengeance, and then JFK decided to secretly "kiss and make up" with both Khrushchev and Castro after the Cuban Missile Crisis, but behind Britain's back. The last of these, apparently was the final straw that broke the camel's back. So JFK had to go. End of the JFK assassination story.

But what is most fascinating about this rendition is that within the context of the syndicate apparatus, the JFK assassination was nothing special? It was a routine off-the shelf operation: Colonel Clay Shaw, a functionary of the Crown, in addition to being both a CIA and a Mossad asset, was placed in charge of the operation. Guy Bannister, a veteran of the FBI's Division five, also a crown mole, along with David Ferry, were in charge of manipulating the pasty, Lee Harvey Oswald. Major Bloomfield, a functionary of the Brofman gang out of Toronto, was responsible for the logistics of getting the funds into Permindex to pay the hit men and ferrying them in and out of the U.S. William Harvey, of the CIA hired two or three Corsicans and had them flown in via Mexico for the hit and the evil deed was done. End of story.

What is so remarkable about these two examples is that both are minor details: utterly unremarkable asides to the main narrative of the book, a narrative that is neither about the JFK assassination nor about Nixon's China policy, per se, but about how they both got caught up in the larger much more powerful machinery of the Crown's drug trafficking apparatus.

Oddly, and somewhat paradoxically, the very fact that the JFK assassination was a mere aside to a larger story, that Garrison's investigations fits into perfectly, lends independent credibility to Jim Garrison's findings. Indeed, is it not reasonable to ask: how is it that the Garrison details just happen to fit so perfectly into a seemingly independent and unrelated story about the history of the drug trade? ... Unless, perhaps that is, those details, somehow, just happen to be very close to the truth?

Add to this the fact that the people who succeeded in scuttling Garrison's investigation (in favor of the very flawed fairy tale called the Warren Commission Report), are also the same ones who prevented this book from being circulated for more than a decade, and it is easy to conclude that maybe some very powerful people feared this book was on the trail of the truth?

But a word of warning is in order for potential readers: Just like all of the JFK assassination stories and theories, this one too is heavy on self-confirming conspiratorial details, and at critical junctures, also, is very short on independently verifiable facts. However, it must also be said that this manuscript is still light years ahead of any others out in the JFK conspiratorial ether.

This is true in part because it is cogent, has a context, can be confirmed or denied after the fact, and most important of all in my view: for no reason at all beyond its apparent validity, it just happened to confirm every detail of Jim Garrison's carefully scuttled investigation, and yet, somehow, it falls perfectly into place in the history of the international drug trade. Now what are the chances this would happen if the theory Garrison put forth were not mostly true?" - Amazon.com comment for the book Dope Inc.
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:37 PM   #6
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

The CFR is the arm of the roundtable group that is based in the US and the royal institute for international affaris or 'chatham house' for short is the groups forum in the UK

The same bloodlines that run the central bank of the US also run the central bank of the UK

They are old templar bloodlines which today work through freemasonry

I wouldn't call it an 'anglo' network though as the bloodlines conquered the angles in 1066 and as far as i can tell from history they have been dumping on the anglo-saxon people ever since (and many other peoples too)
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 04:38 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:40 PM   #7
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

SOUTH AFRICA: How The British Destroyed A Once Peaceful Land And It's People!

https://www.facebook.com/sa.newscom/...91138901198986

"They say that ignorance is power, to those who want to keep you ignorant, which is usually those in power for no other reason than to control. The power lies with each of us,the individual, and that power is the curiosity for information, to do research, and ask questions. That is what sets us apart from being an informed individual with an inquisitive mind, and, uninformed people who just follow blindly without self-enriching themselves with information and facts.

Information is what makes us question things by broadening our mind, by not just accepting one viewpoint, but by looking at things from different angles. Digging deeper, on a topic or history titbit discovered, and getting the different angles of a story, is what creates, “critical thought” and healthy debates.

What many South African’s don’t realize is that the Anglo-Boer War was the main instigator, of the start of modern problems we are facing today in South Africa. Ask most South African’s about history, and they vaguely tell you something from 1652, with most knowing not history, but propaganda which was pumped repeatedly into heads, in order to create a biased perceptions or opinion by those in power. This is the opposite of critical thought and just repeating what you hear. “Intellectual Parrotism” Most South Africans will recite the history of the last 40 years like a parrot, just showing the power of mass indoctrination. Having an education does not mean anything, if you act like a parrot and just repeat what you read, without having a deeper understanding of a topic.

Photo 2: Many groups had their own lands, but it was not enough for the British. They had to have the prize of South Africa. The Boer Republics. African land was easy for them to conquer. Not so much the little Republics.
Before the Boer war with Britain (1899 – 1902), there were treaties in place, between the Boers and Africans as these groups lived and confronted each other over decades. They settled and got to know each other, who to trust, and who not to trust. Boers were seen as just another African tribe. On the other hand, Britain were the outsiders. The aliens that wanted land in order to enrich the global Empire. The tactics of the day, as still is today, was to conquer and divide. To create suspicion and instigate distrust between Boers and Africans. Before the Anglo-Boer War (South African War or Second War of Independence as it is known by other names), there was general peace as each group had negotiated borders and land even helping each other in many cases because of friendship and alliances. Before Britain attacked the Boer Republics, the Zulu’s were in line first to lose their land to British expansion. South Africa was not like it is today, but consisted of many nations. What changed this dramatically was when Britain Attacked the two Boer Republics, the Transvaal, and Orange Free State. Yes! Before Britain attacked the Boer Republics, South Africa was actually more than THREE different countries, including the Zulu Kingdoms! This meant that these nations were governing themselves!

The goal of the British was to take all those little countries and areas, of the Boers, Zulu’s, Xhosas, etc and turn it into one BIG country (British Imperialism and colonialism), which turned into the modern day, South Africa. The defeat of the Boers, by the British, made all those treaties obsolete. This, of course, created a lot of new problems under British rule. All these nations now had to bow down to Britain. , which meant they lost their sovereignty, to make their own choices, and to rule over their own people. They “belonged” to Britain now. This ended in 1961 when South Africa became an independent Republic.

Photo 3: This is how South Africa looked till 1961, giving the country to the Afrikaner, who then had to fix the land issue started by the British. The British, of course, took what they wanted, brought more problems by the war they created, the borders they cut up, and then left it for the Afrikaners to fix. Taking no responsibility as usual.

This defeat meant that everyone, Boers, and Africans, became “subjects” of the Queen of England. They were now governed, not by their Kings or Presidents, but by Great Britain.

The Boers inherited the laws made by Great Britain including the “Native Land Act of 1913” as the Boers did not control South Africa, or were in a position to have the last say. They were subservient to England. If people understand South Africa’s past, which can be complicated and confusing at times, it will be better understood. Our history is not just black and white, yes or no, or right or wrong answers. In many cases, it’s “grey” like the stories below will show.

Louis Botha and Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo

Louis Botha was a famous Boer General and South African Statesman. Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo was the king of the Zulu nation from 1884 until his death in 1913. Cetshwayo succeeded his father Dingaan and was crowned as the Zulu King in 1873. During the same year, Maphitha Zulu the leader of the Mandlakazi section died and was succeeded by his son Zibhebhu kaMaphitha. After Cetshwayo’s capital, Ulundi was captured and torched he was exiled to London. Disorder broke out and in an attempt to resolve this, Zululand was divided into 13 districts in 1879 by the British. Zibhebhu was appointed as one of the 13 independent chiefs’ and was allocated the Mandlakazi district. His kraal was not far from the boundaries of the current ZRR, further upstream on the Msunduzi River.

All the Zulu people north of the Umhlatuzi River have again been placed under Cetshwayo after his restoration in 1883 apart from the Mandlakazi section which remained under Zibhebhu’s authority. Almost immediately tribal wars broke out between the Mandlakazi tribe and Cetshwayo followers. Zibhebhu’s army burnt Cetshwayo’s kraal in Ulundi on 21st July in 1883 and was responsible for Cetshwayo’s flight which later ended in his death on the 8th February 1884. Dinizulu the son of Cetshwayo was left to fight for succession and with the help of General Louis Botha defeated Zibhebhu and his army at the Battle of Ghost Mountain. The Boers acquired cattle and a large portion of the fertile land in Zululand and the Usuturefuted this. The British Government interfered and the land acquired by the Boers was confirmed and the remainder of Zululand was annexed by the British in 1884.

Photo 4: Kin Dinuzulu KaCetshwayo and Louis Botha
Tribal lands were officially demarcated by Zululand’s Delimitation Commission in 1902. Zibhebhu, Chief of the Mandlakazi tribe died on the 27th August 1904. His successor Bokwe Zulu was only 2 years old when he died and so his brother Mciteki Zulu was appointed as the acting chief. Bokwe Zulu was appointed Chief on the 1st January 1920 until he became seriously ill in 1939. Between 1939 and 1947 there were several acting Chiefs of the Mandlakazi Tribe. In 1947, they requested that acting Chief Mbangomuni Nxumalo be deposed and that the area be divided into 4 sections, each under the authority of a headman. 12th October 1949 Pumanyana Zulu Bokwe was officially appointed as the Chief of the Mandlakazi tribe.

The Government notice 1235 in August 1957 stipulated the approval of the tribal area and the official tribal authority as “The Mandlakazi Tribal Authority”. Pumanyana Zulu’s successor Eugene Bhekintinta Zulu became of age and was appointed by the Zulu Government as Chief of the Mandlakazi tribe as it is still today.” Zululand had been broken up into 13 smaller territories after the Anglo-Zulu War against Britain which lasted from 11 January – 4 July 1879

(5 months, 3 weeks and 2 days)

Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo was the last king of the Zulus to be officially recognized as such by the British. On 22 July 1883, Usibepu(A son of Cetshwayo’s) attacked Dinuzulu’s new kraal in Ulundi, wounding the king and causing him to flee. To contest the succession, Dinuzulu first appealed to the British but had no response. He then offered rewards of land to Boer mercenaries who would come and fight on his side. In 1884, a group of Boer farmers from the districts of Utrecht and Vryheid undertook to restore order, in return for land for the formation of an independent republic. These volunteers to help the Zulu king was Led by General Louis Botha.
Louis Botha was an Afrikaner (Also known as Boers) and first Prime Minister of the Union of South Africa—the forerunner of the modern South African state. (1862 – 1919) Botha’s volunteers formed, “Dinuzulu’s Volunteers” and after several clashes with Usibepu (Zibhebhu), defeated him at the Battle of Ghost Mountain (also known as the Battle of Tshaneni) on 5 June 1884. 500 Boer mercenaries each received a farm from the Zulu King,Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo, of 16 km². Another 300 men who had arrived late received smaller grants, known as ‘half farms’. On 5 August 1884, these mercenaries declared a republic, with the town of Vryheid as its capital, which lasted for only four years. In 1890 Dinuzulu was captured by the British and exiled to the island of St. Helena—the same as Napoleon and Boer General Piet Cronje—for seven years for leading a Zulu army against the British from 1883 to 1884.
Two years later an old friend of Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo , Boer General Louis Botha believed that Dinuzulu did not have a fair trial by the British. When Louis Botha became Prime Minister of South Africa in 1910, one of the first things he did was to order Dinuzulu’s release. He granted him a farm near Middelburg, Transvaal, to which the King of the Zulus retired. He died in 1913. A statue of Dinuzulu has been erected next to the statue of General Louis Botha, the first prime minister of the Transvaal colony, at the corner of Berea Road and Warwick Avenue in Durban. And this is possibly why older black generations (on top of the WW1 and WW2 black veterans) took on the name of “Botha”.

Photo 5: Piet Cronje and Len Tau and Yamasan.

Boer General Piet Cronje (1836 – 1911) was a Boer General during the Anglo-Boer war, and later Prisoner of War (POW) on the island of Saint Helena. The war was between the Boers and Great Britain when gold and diamonds were discovered. Cronje was held on the same island where Napoleon Bonaparte was a held, including King of the Zulu nation, Dinuzulu kaCetshwayo. (Story above) Len Tau (real name: Len Taunyane) and Yamasani (real name: Jan Mashiani) were two Tswana tribesmen,and the first black Africans to compete in the Olympic Games. South Africa, 2 years (1904) after the Anglo-Boer War against Britain, (It took about 2 years for most POW’s to return to South Africa after the war ended) returning to South Africa from Saint Helena, Boer General Piet Cronje met these two o men, who became his friends, Len Tau (left) and Jan Mashiani. He sent them to the University of the Free State (Freestate being a Boer Republic before the war with Great Britain)
General Piet Cronje, paid the university fees out of his own pocket. When Cronje heard about the 1904 Olympic Games which were to be held in the USA and sent both of these men to compete. The games was a special ”Ethnic Games” had been included in the program, which saw American Natives, Pygmies, Aborigini, and other groups taking part. They had been brought over by the exposition as part of the Boer War exhibit, which was an exhibit by Boers, after the war, to try and get money from the US to built up the South African infrastructure after the British burned 40 000 farms, and killed all the livestock.

Len Tau finished ninth and Yamasani came in twelfth. This was a disappointment, as many observers were sure Len Tau could have done better if he had not been chased nearly a mile off course by aggressive dogs. Watch this movie which fits these stories well, about a Boer Tracker that went to New Zealand when the Boer War ended. It is the Full movie online, and worth watching.

Maori’s of New Zealand and the Boer War

Some New Zealand Maori’s were Pro-Boers during the Anglo-Boer war with Britain – There were some Maori communities who sympathized with the Boers, feeling that responsibility for the war lay with the British who wanted more land, as they saw it as a fight against colonialism and imperialism by the British.

HOW BRITAIN IS STILL DESTROYING SOUTH AFRICA, THE JEWISH INFLUENCE

Photo 6: 'Racism Run Riot' - Rabbi Rabinovitch

Full Speech Of Rabbi Rabbinovitch Found
(http://www.rense.com/general45/full.htm)

"The sun never sets on the British Empire.” Arguably the greatest empire of all time, at its height the British Empire was certainly the largest empire in history, and for nearly two centuries was the foremost global power. By 1922, the British ruled more than 458 million people and covered 13,012,000 square miles—almost a quarter of the Earth’s total land area.But in spite of these great selfish "accomplishments,"- the British Empire sowed the seeds for some of the worst disasters that have afflicted humanity. Although the British were not responsible for all of the events directly, their interference in others’ problems was often, especially in South Africa.

As we have seen above- in the 19th century the British fought wars to subject the Boer states to British Rule. In 1948, the Boers took power democratically, with the election of the (British created) National Party. In the 1960s, the government of Hendrik Verwoerd took power and implemented the formal separate but equal policies in South Africa. These policies made South Africa the economically strongest nation in Africa and gave the blacks in South Africa (and the whites) the highest standards of living of any African nation.

Verwoerd's policies had two main opponents. One was a Jew named Harry Oppenheimer, the other a Jew named Anton Ruppert. Both controlled banking monopolies in the country and wanted "rights" extended to black South Africans for the purpose of extending their money lending business. Oppenheimer had ties to the Rothschild banking family and to the US CIA, which throughout the 1970s through 1990s supported the overthrow of the white South African rule, at the direction of the Jew Henry Kissinger.
Oppenheimer lobbied the Rothschilds to overthrow Verwoerd, who had publicly denounced the Jewish banking monopolies in Parliament. The Rothschilds secured the support of the Rockefeller, Carnegie and other "Anglo" families in the United States, and had those institutions lobby against the white government. Rockefeller influenced the Council on Foreign Relations and its members in the US government in particular to oppose the white rule.

African National Congress - ANC

Legendary Jewish Heroes of Black Rule in South Africa - Stamps

Photo 7: Baruch Hirson
Photo 8: Eli Weinberg
Photo 9: Ester Barsel
Photo 10: Hymie Barsel
Photo 11: Hilda Bernstein
Photo 12: Helen Suzman (Gavronsky)
Photo 13: Lionel "Rusty" Bernstein
Photo 14: Norma Kitson
Photo 15: Ray Alexander
Photo 16: Ronald Segal
Photo 17: Ruth First
Photo 18: Yetta Barenblatt

In 1963, a group of Jews founded the "African" National Congress. The ANC was founded by Lionel Bernstein, Bob Hepple, Dennis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, Hazel Goldreich and James Kantor, with a few African front men -- Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki (father of Thabo Mbeki), Raymond Mhlaba, and Ahmed Kathrada. In this, the ANC followed the model the Jews established when they founded the NAACP in the United States, with the exception that the ANC was a much more violent and openly communist organization. These Jews and their African National Congress received funding and support from both the Soviet Union and the US CIA.

In particular, Ruth First, the Jewish wife of Jewish Soviet KGB Colonel Joe Slovo, a leader of the South African Communist Party, was primarily responsible for funneling funds to this "African" National Congress.
In 1966, the CIA financed the assassination of President Verwoerd, through their "lone nut" operative Demetrio Tsafendas, a Greek immigrant to South Africa. In particular, Oppenheimer's South African Foundation funneled CIA money to Hendrik Van Den Bergh of the South African Security Police and John Vorster, the Minister of Justice, who were the men who recruited Tsafendas to assassinate Verwoerd.

By the 1970s the Jewish campaign to subvert South Africa was having no effect. The economy was unaffected by sanctions and communist unrest was minimal - though much was made of it in the Jewish owned elements of the US press.

In 1978 the CIA recruited Pik Botha, the South African foreign minister, as a spy and used him to subvert the South African government, working with Samuel Huntington and Chester Crocker, Botha was assigned to undermine and alter the attitudes of the South African government regarding the black rule.
Botha recruited Minister of Sports Piet Koornhof**and Head of Military Intelligence General Tienie Groenewald to the CIA-Jew operation. Groenewald, in particular, passed on the names of Afrikaner nationalist and white rights activists to BRITISH MI6 and the CIA, and arranged for acts of violence and harassment, COINTELPRO style, against Boer activists in the country.

In the late 1970s and the early 1980s the banking families, Oppenheimer in particular, began to speculate in the Rand for the purpose of devaluing the currency. Inflation rose to 7 percent and growth fell to 3 percent, with inflation reaching 16 percent in the early 1980s.

In 1989, a Freemason with ties to B'nai B'rith, the Jewish Masonic fraternity which controls the ADL, was elected President of South Africa. President Frederik De Klerk was a Jewish-backed candidate with ties to the international Zionist establishment. De Klerk worked for and eventually achieved, the Jewish goal of black rule in South Africa.

South Africa's central bank was run by a Jew named Gill Marcus, with the black frontman named Tito Mboweni taking instructions. Trevor Manuel, a Jew, is the Minister of Finance. Rob Davis, a British matelot, is the Minister of Trade and Industry. Helena Dolny, the Jewish ex-wife of KGB Colonel Joe Slovo,was running the Land Bank. Ronnie Kasrils, a Jew,was the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry. Louise Tager, a Jew, was chairman of the railway system, Spoornet. Michael Katz, a Jew, was the chief consultant on taxation. Meyer Kahn, a Jew, was the managing director of the police service. Three Jews -- Richard Goldstone, Arthur Chaskalson, and Albert Sachs -sat on the South African Supreme Court.

What has happened in South Africa under the name of "democracy" and "diversity" has been the Jewish takeover of their country. As with all Jewish governments, South Africa is now a failed nation. It is poor, it is crime ridden, and it is not safe to walk the streets. The Jews wage war on anyone who opposes their total domination of the world's economy. They also work to make sure they control the governments of every single developed country in the world. As we see today- British Jewry again are meddling into South African affairs by training and financially supporting Julius Malema and his radical EFF party. This is the earmark of Britain and her Jewry money mongers. They create political parties- then use the common "lone nut" strategy by exploiting front men like Mandela and Malema to destroy healthy economies- leaving a vacuum where they then can fill the gap and assert their domination of power, whether that party is ANC, DA, Democratic or whatever. Jews use whatever tools they can - phony allegations of "racism" or pleas for "democracy", for instance - to win stupid, thoughtless non-Jews to their cause, but all celebrated communist, socialist, "democratic" and/or anti-racist groups in the world are Jewish run and Jewish financed.

The sooner white people and black people in South Africa realize that Britain and her Jews are the main culprits behind the chaos South Africa finds herself in presently- the quicker they again can unite against a common enemy. BUT as long as whites and blacks in South Africa still believe their so-called "political" leaders will bring peace and prosperity to that country- they will be exploited as "animals" to fight and kill each other for the greater British ( NWO) cause. As long as there are political parties active in that country- there will be division between people and racism will be used as a vehicle the British Jewry empire will use to "divide and conquer."

This is no more evident than the latest spate of "racist" propaganda attacks in the newspapers and social media against whites that the communist British-controlled ANC, DA, and EFF are using to keep black and white divided in South Africa. Then "Diversity" propaganda also are used to exterminate different ethnic races and their histories in order to create one "global" race that will be more easily "controllable." The DA in South Africa particularly is driving this devious agenda.South Africans must stand up against this destructive evil called " political parties" - get rid of all of them- and return to a confederate system where each tribe/ethnic group rule itself demographically and sovereign in its OWN territory. Only THEN will there be peace in that land and different races can co-exist without domination of one over the other. All they do is to oppress people, murder them like the Marikana incident, use them as "animals" to riot and create chaos- all to gain power for themselves - and plunder their taxes for personal gain. NEVER believe your so-called "politicians" - irrespective WHO they are - and what they promise. ALL of them are being controlled and bankrolled by the British/Anglo American Jewry. As long as Church Street will be controlled by Wall Street- there will be chaos, crime, and instability in that once prosperous country.

Jews Conspired To Destroy The White South African Government And Murder The Boer - Afrikaner People
SOURCE - http://balder.org/…/South-Africa-Ter...C-Revolution-J

THE BRITISH FRONT MEN, MANDELA, AND MALEMA

On his grooming and begging tour of the UK, Kiddie Amin told the Oxford students that rich white men made Mandela into a sell-out of blacks and a betrayer of their revolution. In other words, Mandela stopped short of killing all the whites in South Africa. Something he, Malema, is having wet dreams about doing.

Photo 19: Julius Malema's picture with Lord Robin Renwick have been leaked and are making rounds on social media. Lord Robin Renwick is a former UK ambassador to SA before 1994, he also has a connection with corporate SA through SABMiller, BhP Billiton, and many others. He is also linked to banking sector through JP Morgan ( Europe). Renwick was appointed to House of Lords by PM Blair in 1997.

He was a chairman of Zimbabwe Democracy Trust set up in 2000 and it was a tool to effect regime change against President Mugabe's government. Earlier news reports revealed that Julius Malema is in the UK to seek more funding for his election campaign. "This man has more interest in Southern Africa than all monopoly capitalists combined. Beware of greedy one because money is his second heart. "Not all that appear revolutionary is indeed revolutionary. EFF is just a tool to effect regime change and the funders make decisions. The media helps the project." read Sediko Rakolote Facebook post.

However, Julias Malema is being briefed, just as Mandela was briefed before he took office as president, and Malema will have to toe the line in exactly the same way. We won’t compromise in the struggle against white supremacy Malema tells Oxford Malema even mentioned the Oppenheimers who hosted Mandela. In fact Mandela was a big friend of the Oppenheimers and often spent Christmas at the Oppenheimer “Little Brenthurst” estate in Johannesburg. He and Harry Oppenheimer even shared the same tailor.
How was Communist Mandela changed?

Easy. By Super Capitalists, just like Malema is now.

In January 1990, two weeks before he was released from his long captivity on Robben Island Mandela said: “The nationalization of the mines, banks, and monopoly industries is the policy of the ANC, and the change or modifications of our views in this regard is inconceivable."

Mandela was assuring his comrades in the African National Congress that he remained loyal to the socialist economic program enshrined in their mid-1950s, Freedom Charter. The ANC would, he promised, give back to the people of South Africa the riches that wealthy whites had stolen from them under British colonial rule and the years of Afrikaner-led apartheid.

Four years later, he would become president of all South Africa and did exactly the opposite of what he promised the blacks. The ANC gave up nationalization and a radical redistribution of wealth. They removed exchange controls, allowing the largest corporations and richest whites to send their money abroad and instead of introducing Soviet styled Socialism, they went for a Scandinavian model. The result? South Africa now suffers a greater gap between rich and poor, white and black, than under apartheid.

What made Mandela sell out the Blacks?

Prof Sampie Terreblanche explains it in his book Lost in Transformation: South Africa's Search for a New Future Since 1986 (2012) As he tells it, there was basically a quiet capitalist coup, and its chief organizer was South Africa's leading industrialist and one of the world's richest men, Sir Harry Oppenheimer, the former chairman of the Anglo-American Corporation and De Beers Consolidated Mines and Dr. Anton Rupert, the cigarette billionaire and on Forbes’ list of the 500 richest people in the world.As for now- a silent white genocide is in the offing against the white race down South- with the British M15 , M16 & CIA hard at work to try exterminating the last white remnants in South Africa. Will the white people in South Africa ever wake up and mobilize against this pending omen rolling down towards them again from the British lords of the flies? Only time will tell."

By: Mike Smith and WN


snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:43 PM   #8
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

^ that article above doesn't explain how the 'british' destroyed south africa, it describes how the jewish bloodlines destroyed south africa

the british were conquered by those bloodlines in 1066 and have been under occupation ever since

the freemasonic establishment is nothing more then the old jewish knights templar bloodlines that were networked across europe and which intermarried with royal households

The likes of the rothchilds who funded the east india company and the de beers company were the bankers of the templar bloodlines and are intermarried with them
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 04:46 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:55 PM   #9
snowleopard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 532
Likes: 81 (44 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
^ that article above doesn't explain how the 'british' destroyed south africa, it describes how the jewish bloodlines destroyed south africa

the british were conquered by those bloodlines in 1066 and have been under occupation ever since

the freemasonic establishment is nothing more then the old jewish knights templar bloodlines that were networked across europe and which intermarried with royal households

The likes of the rothchilds who funded the east india company and the de beers company were the bankers of the templar bloodlines and are intermarried with them
Jews have always been loyal to the British Empire. Its an alliance that started with the adoption of Protestantism by the British monarchy, essentially to allow slavery in the Americas because it was banned by the Catholic Church. Protestant countries practiced slavery in alliance with the Jewish communities. Jews took control of the slave trade because of their networks all over Europe, the Middle East and Africa. England used this network of Jewish traders and Scottish economists to build the world banking system we know today (City of London) thanks to its naval strength. When oil was discovered in Iran, England prepared plans for the creation of Israel to establish a permanent state in the Middle East with access to the Mediterranean (transport). Jews present in all countries form a very practical international network of spies for the British Empire.
snowleopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 04:57 PM   #10
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
^ that article above doesn't explain how the 'british' destroyed south africa, it describes how the jewish bloodlines destroyed south africa

the british were conquered by those bloodlines in 1066 and have been under occupation ever since

the freemasonic establishment is nothing more then the old jewish knights templar bloodlines that were networked across europe and which intermarried with royal households

The likes of the rothchilds who funded the east india company and the de beers company were the bankers of the templar bloodlines and are intermarried with them
"its not white people, its Jewish people"

you love to scream this all the time huh Waves.

I think in reality its "the rich people"

The rich people are white though, whether Jewish, Christian, or Atheist on the outside.
Likes: (1)
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:05 PM   #11
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Personally I think the closest the planet has ever come to total domination by the NWO, was just after the fall of the USSR in 1991.

You see total domination will come when we have ONE SUPERPOWER that dictates to the rest of the world, and when either the rest of the world agrees, or is forced to agree.

When the Soviet Union fell, there was no major power to counter the ANglo American block.

This was when former Soviet client states were being taken out and you saw the dismantling of Iraq and then Yugoslavia.

Since then China has become a major player and Russia has somewhat emerged from the chaos of the Soviet collapse.

The 2 lines of thought coming out of the Anglo American block are either

a) work with China and Russia as somewhat equal partners to form the NWO (the progressive line of thought)

b) dominate China and Russia and force them to submit to the NWO (the rightwing line of thought)

Last edited by vancity eagle; 24-02-2018 at 05:05 PM.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:21 PM   #12
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowleopard View Post
Jews have always been loyal to the British Empire. Its an alliance that started with the adoption of Protestantism by the British monarchy, essentially to allow slavery in the Americas because it was banned by the Catholic Church. Protestant countries practiced slavery in alliance with the Jewish communities. Jews took control of the slave trade because of their networks all over Europe, the Middle East and Africa. England used this network of Jewish traders and Scottish economists to build the world banking system we know today (City of London) thanks to its naval strength. When oil was discovered in Iran, England prepared plans for the creation of Israel to establish a permanent state in the Middle East with access to the Mediterranean (transport). Jews present in all countries form a very practical international network of spies for the British Empire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
"its not white people, its Jewish people"

you love to scream this all the time huh Waves.

I think in reality its "the rich people"

The rich people are white though, whether Jewish, Christian, or Atheist on the outside.
i agree with much of what you are both saying here but you are missing a key piece of information

it did not start with the protestant reformation

The jews were already married in with the normans who invaded britain in 1066

the first crusade was in 1095 just a short time after britain was conquered and occupied

the jewish bloodlines wanted to return to jerusalem after they had been driven out by the approaching roman army in 70AD

The jewish bloodlines intermarried with norman and frankish aristocracy but they maintained their qabalistic initiatory rituals and degrees system which they later formed into freemasonry

This enabled them to maintain a cohesive network that then intermarried with itself to keep the network tight

over centuries they helped each other out in trade, banking and through marriages and promotions and became the royal households

For example in my country scotland they threw the last celtic king off a cliff and poisoned the next in line so that they could put their guy robert the bruce on the throne

Its those bloodlines that have been behind what you call the 'british empire' but which more correctly could be called the 'freemasonic empire'. they are 'the hidden hand' that so many people can't seem to see
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 05:25 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:23 PM   #13
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
Personally I think the closest the planet has ever come to total domination by the NWO, was just after the fall of the USSR in 1991.

You see total domination will come when we have ONE SUPERPOWER that dictates to the rest of the world, and when either the rest of the world agrees, or is forced to agree.

When the Soviet Union fell, there was no major power to counter the ANglo American block.

This was when former Soviet client states were being taken out and you saw the dismantling of Iraq and then Yugoslavia.

Since then China has become a major player and Russia has somewhat emerged from the chaos of the Soviet collapse.

The 2 lines of thought coming out of the Anglo American block are either

a) work with China and Russia as somewhat equal partners to form the NWO (the progressive line of thought)

b) dominate China and Russia and force them to submit to the NWO (the rightwing line of thought)
No the bloodlines created the soviet union and were managing both sides of the cold war

This is why victor rothschild was in with the soviet spies in the cambridge 5. He and they were feeding info to the soviets and acting as a bridge between the two sides

The masonic b'nai brith group acted as the springboard for the bolshevik revolution

The templar bloodlines also funded the nazis as a dialectic response to the rise of the soviet communists

Today the bloodlines have built communist china into the powerhouse it is today in a relationship the historian nial fergusson labelled 'chimerica'
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:26 PM   #14
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Skull&Bones, Antony Sutton, and bankrolling the enemy
Jon Rappoport
8 hours ago

“When you see the same elites funding, encouraging, and enabling both sides in a major war, you’re on the road to understanding war from a higher perspective. These elites use war to create chaos, which they then ‘solve’ by imposing, in the aftermath, their kind of order—greater control over life, greater control over institutions of government. They call this operation ‘peace’. But it’s really the shrinking of freedom.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)


The prodigious author and researcher, Antony Sutton (1925-2002), wrote about hidden men behind momentous events.

I recently came across a 1999 interview with Sutton, conducted by Kris Millegan, researcher and head of TrineDay publishers.

Millegan wrote about Antony Sutton in 1999: “Antony C. Sutton, 74, has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In 1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton showed how the Soviet state’s technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet’s large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help or technical assistance.”

“…Then, someone sent Antony a membership list of Skull and Bones and— ‘a picture jumped out’. And what a picture! A multigenerational foreign-based secret society with fingers in all kinds of pies and roots going back to ‘Illuminati’ influences in 1830’s Germany.”

Here are excerpts from the 1999 interview:

Millegan – Can you tell the story of how you learned of Skull & Bones? And how you felt?

Sutton – I knew nothing of S&B until I received a letter in the early 80’s asking if I would like to look at a genuine membership list. For no real reason I said yes. It was agreed to send the package by Federal Express and I could keep it for 24 hours, it had to be returned to the safe. It was a “black bag” job by a family member disgusted with their activities.

For the benefit of any S&B members who may read and doubt the statement; the membership list is in two volumes, black leather bound. Living members and deceased members in separate volumes. Very handsome books.

I spent all night in Kinko’s, Santa Cruz, copied the entire volumes and returned within the 24 hour period.

I have never released any copies or identified the source. I figured each copy could be coded and enable S&B to trace the leak.

How did I feel? I felt then (as I do now** that these “prominent” men are really immature juveniles at heart. The horrible reality is that these little boys have been dominant in their influence in world affairs. No wonder we have wars and violence. Skull and Bones is the symbol of terrorist violence, pirates, the SS Deaths Head Division in WW Two, labels on poison bottles and so on.

I kept the stack of xerox sheets for quite a while before I looked at them—when I did look—a picture jumped out, THIS was a significant part of the so called establishment. No wonder the world has problems!

Millegan: – What did your study of elites, economics, secrecy and technology do for your career?

Sutton – Depends what you mean by “career”?

By conventional standards I am an abject failure. I’ve been thrown out of two major Universities (UCLA and Stanford), denied tenure at Cal State Los Angeles. Every time I write something, it appears to offend someone in the Establishment and they throw me to the wolves.

On the other hand I’ve written 26 books, published a couple of newsletters and so on…even more important I’ve never compromised on the truth. And I don’t quit.

In material terms…hopeless failure. In terms of discovery…I think I’ve been successful. Judge a man by his enemies. William Buckley called me a “jerk”. Glenn Campbell, former Director of the Hoover Institution, Stanford called me “a problem”.

Millegan – Did any of Hitler’s economic policies threaten the interests of the international bankers, and if so did that play a role in his downfall?

Sutton – Hitler’s economic policies were OK’d by the bankers right through the war…ITT, Chase, Texaco and others were operating in Nazi-held France as late as 1945. In fact Chase in Paris was trying to get [acquire] Nazi accounts as late as 1944. When we got to Germany in May 1945, I remember seeing a (bombed-out) Woolworth store in Hamburg and thinking, “What’s Woolworth doing in Nazi Germany?” While we were bombed and shelled it was “business as usual” for Big Business. Try the Alien Custodian Papers.

…Union Banking is very important. I made a documentary for Dutch National TV some years ago. It got all the way through the production process to the Dutch TV Guide…at the last minute it was pulled and another film substituted. This documentary has proof of Bush financing Hitler—documents.

Maybe my Dutch friends will still get it viewed, but the [Skull&Bones] apparatus reaches into Holland.

Millegan – What is the story that was going to be told on Dutch TV? And what is the story of its censorship?

Sutton – Couple of years back, a Dutch TV production company from Amsterdam—under contract to Dutch National TV—came to US to make documentary on S&B [Skull and Bones]. They went to the Bones Temple and other places and interviewed people on East Coast. On West Coast, they interviewed myself and one other person.

I saw extracts from the original and it is a good professional job. They had documents linking Bush family and other S&B members to financing Hitler through Union Banking of New York and its Dutch correspondent bank. More than I have in [Sutton’s book] WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER.

The first version was later upgraded into a two part documentary and scheduled for showing this last March. It was pulled at last minute and has never been shown.

Millegan – What do you see for the future?

Suttton – Chaos, confusion and ultimately a battle between the individual and the State.

The individual is the stronger; and will win. The state is a fiction sanctified by Hegel and his followers to CONTROL the individual.

Sooner or later people will wake up. First we have to dump the trap of right and left, this is a Hegelian trap to divide and control. The battle is not between right and left; it is between us and them…

—end of interview excerpt—

Here is a telling Antony Sutton quote from his book, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986):

“By using data of Russian origin it is possible to make an accurate analysis of the origins of this equipment. It was found that all the main diesel and steam-turbine propulsion systems of the ninety-six Soviet ships on the Haiphong supply run [to the North Vietnamese] that could be identified (i.e., eighty-four out of the ninety-six) originated in design or construction outside the USSR. We can conclude, therefore, that if the [US] State and Commerce Departments, in the 1950s and 1960s, had consistently enforced the legislation passed by Congress in 1949, the Soviets would not have had the ability to supply the Vietnamese War – and 50,000 more Americans and countless Vietnamese would be alive today.”

“Who were the government officials responsible for this transfer of known military technology? The concept originally came from National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, who reportedly sold President Nixon on the idea that giving military technology to the Soviets would temper their global territorial ambitions. How Henry arrived at this gigantic non sequitur is not known. Sufficient to state that he aroused considerable concern over his motivations. Not least that Henry had been a paid family employee of the Rockefellers since 1958 and has served as International Advisory Committee Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, a Rockefeller concern.”

If you think such traitorous actions could never have occurred, I point you to another researcher, Charles Higham, and his 1983 classic, Trading with the Enemy.

Higham focuses on World War 2. The men behind the curtain Higham exposed are in the same basic group that Antony Sutton exposed.

Higham, Trading with the Enemy:

“What would have happened if millions of American and British people, struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey [part of the Rockefeller empire] managers shipped the enemy’s [Germany’s] fuel through neutral Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars’ worth of business with the enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan [the Rockefeller family among others?] Or that Ford trucks were being built for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler’s communications systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT built the FockeWulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops? Or that crucial ball bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U.S. War Production Board in partnership with Goering’s cousin in Philadelphia when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or deliberately ignored?”

Getting the picture?

War, what is it good for? With the same elites backing both sides, it’s good for business. It’s good for creating chaos and destruction. It’s good for launching new global organizations, in the aftermath; organizations that exert a level of control and reach that didn’t exist before. It’s good for launching organizations like the United Nations and the European Union and the World Trade Organization—dedicated to Globalism, which in turn is dedicated to planned civilization, in which the individual is demeaned and the group is All.

Freedom is demeaned; and dominance by the few over the many is hailed as peace in our time.



The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/45...krolling-enemy
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 05:26 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:27 PM   #15
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Missing history: US oligarchs finance Socialism
Jon Rappoport
8 hours ago

In 1971, Gary Allen published his book, None Dare Call it Conspiracy. It quickly became an unofficial best seller.

Over the years, several million copies have been sold.

Allen’s thesis was stark: super-rich American capitalists were financing socialism. This bizarre paradox was resolved when socialism was properly understood—not as “power to the people”—but as elite power over the people. In other words, as a hoax.

These days, the socialist hoax is still unknown to most of the population:

Cloak a global power grab as progress for all of humanity.

Here, from chapter six of None Dare Call it Conspiracy, “The Rockefellers and the Reds,” is an explosive passage commenting on the period just after the Russian Revolution of 1917:

“The Rockefellers assigned their public relations agent, Ivy Lee, to sell the American public the idea that the Bolsheviks were merely misunderstood idealists who were actually kind benefactors of mankind.”

“Professor Antony Sutton of Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, notes in his highly authoritative Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development:”

“’Quite predictably…[Ivy] Lee concludes that the communist problem is merely psychological. By this time he is talking about “Russians” (not Communists) and concludes “they are all right.” He suggests the United States should not engage in propaganda; makes a plea for peaceful coexistence; and suggests the United States would find it sound policy to recognize the USSR and advance credits [give loans].’ (Antony Sutton, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1917-1930, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University, Calif., 1968, p.292)”

“After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard [Oil] of New Jersey [Rockefeller] bought 50 per cent of the Nobel’s huge Caucasus oil fields even though the property had theoretically been nationalized [by Russia]. (O’Connor, Harvey, The Empire Of Oil, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1955, p.270.)”

“In 1927, Standard Oil of New York [Rockefeller] built a refinery in Russia, thereby helping the Bolsheviks put their economy back on its feet. Professor Sutton states: ‘This was the first United States investment in Russia since the Revolution.’ (Ibid, Vol.1, p.38)”

“Shortly thereafter Standard Oil of New York and its subsidiary, Vacuum Oil Company [Rockefeller], concluded a deal to market Soviet oil in European countries and it was reported that a loan of $75,009,000 to the Bolsheviks was arranged. (National Republic, Sept.1927.)”

“…Wherever Standard Oil would go, Chase National Bank was sure to follow. (The Rockefeller’s Chase Bank was later merged with the Warburg’s Manhattan Bank to form the present Chase Manhattan Bank.) In order to rescue the Bolsheviks, who were supposedly an archenemy, the Chase National Bank was instrumental in establishing the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce in 1922. President of the Chamber was Reeve Schley, a vice-president of Chase National Bank. (Ibid, Vol.11, p.288) According to Professor Sutton: ‘In 1925, negotiations between Chase and [Russian] Prombank extended beyond the finance of raw materials and mapped out a complete program for financing Soviet raw material exports to the U. S. and imports of U. S. cotton and machinery.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.226) Sutton also reports that ‘Chase National Bank and the Equitable Trust Company were leaders in the Soviet credit business.’ (Ibid, p.277)”

“The Rockefeller’s Chase National Bank also was involved in selling Bolshevik bonds in the United States in 1928. Patriotic organizations denounced the Chase as an ‘international fence.’ Chase was called ‘a disgrace to America… They will go to any lengths for a few dollars profits.’ (Ibid, Vol.11, p.291) Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintained in a speech to his fellow Congressmen:”

“’The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company and other banks in New York City.”

“’Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States’ Treasury for the benefit of Russia. Find out what business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York’. (Congressional Record, June 15, 1933.)”

“But the Rockefellers apparently were not alone in financing the Communist arm of the Insiders’ conspiracy. According to Professor Sutton ‘… there is a report in the State Department files that names Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (the long established and important financial house in New York) as the financier of the [Russians’] First Five Year Plan. See U. S. State Dept. Decimal File, 811.51/3711 and 861.50 FIVE YEAR PLAN/236.’ (Sutton, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 340n.)”

“Professor Sutton proves conclusively in his three volume history of Soviet technological development that the Soviet Union was almost literally manufactured by the U.S.A…”

“…Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.”

“This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-lnsider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, America spends $75 billion a year on defense to protect itself from the enemy the Insiders are building up.”

NOTE: The descendants of these bankers are now doing everything they can to build up the story that Donald Trump won the presidency by colluding with Russians. To call this an irony, in view of the above information, would be a vast understatement.

However, the motives of these men are clear: regardless of whether Trump meant to keep his promises to destroy Globalism (aka worldwide Socialism), his mere mention of Globalism as the enemy, during the presidential campaign, and his declared opposition to Globalist “free trade” treaties, was sufficient to warrant an all-out attack on him.

The whole idea of nationalism as preferable to Globalism could act as a contagious germ spreading to the people of other countries—so Trump as the face and symbol of such sentiments had to be defamed and crushed.

Through various front organizations, cutouts, dupes, brainwashed useful idiots, and violent hired thugs, that operation to crush Trump is well underway.

Again—and this point must be understood—IT DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER TRUMP EVER MEANT TO KEEP HIS PROMISE TO BURY GLOBALISM. THE MERE MENTION OF GLOBALISM AS THE ENEMY WAS AND IS SUFFICIENT TO WARRANT UNCEASING ATTACKS AGAINST HIM.

Many, many of Trump’s supporters want to see Globalism buried.

Ultimately, these supporters are the real target of the Globalists.

These millions of targets—human beings who want freedom, a return to Constitutional principles, and an end to both Globalism and American Empire—gave support to presidential candidates before Trump: Ross Perot and Ron Paul.

These “targets” aren’t going away. They understand how the American Republic was betrayed. The above evidence reveals that betrayal was a set-up, designed to prop up and rescue a system (the USSR) that was dead on arrival, a complete failure.

Elite money created Socialist Russia, sustained it, bailed it out, and propagandized it as a movement of the people.

Socialism is a movement of, by, and for the super-rich.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
https://www.davidicke.com/article/45...ance-socialism
__________________
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:46 PM   #16
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
Now according to the research of David Livingstone, who I respect very much,.
Rothschilds and the Grail Bloodline
- by David Livingstone ©, Aug. 22nd, 2005

Jacob Rothschild, the current head of the Rothschild dynasty, has intermarried with the Sinclair family, forging an important alliance between the head family of the Illuminati, and the supposed descendants of the Grail family.

As has been popularized recently by Dan Brown in the Da Vinci Code, or before him by the Holy Blood, Holy Grail, the Stuarts of Scotland are supposedly descended from King Arthur and Jesus Christ. These families are of course not descended from Jesus. The idea is preposterous. But they are related to the Holy Grail, and they are not Christians, but Kabbalists.

In reality, they, like all the aristocratic bloodlines that form the core of the Illuminati, are descended from Guillaume de Gellone of the eighth century AD. Guillaume's father was Rabbi Makhir, among the Exilarchs who ruled the Jews in Baghdad, who was sent West after a dispute over the successorship. In France, he took the name Theodoric, married Alda, the aunt of Charlemagne, and was appointed “King of the Jews” in the region of the Languedoc, with his capital the city of Narbonne.

Narbonne then became the heartland of the Medieval Kabbalah. The Kabbalists of Narbonne seem to have been responsible for instigating the Crusades, in order to retrieve sacred texts that had been buried there, but which had been unaccessible because of first the rule of the Romans, and then the Muslims. Once Jerusalem was conquered, a Kabbalistic order of knights known as the Templars conducted excavations, and discovered the text of the Sepher ha Bahir, which revived the lost mystical tradition, and set off the cultural revolution of the Medieval Kabbalah.

Another aspect of the penetration of these Kabbalistic ideas was the heresy of the Cathars. The Cathar foothold was in the region of Tolouse, the bastion of the descendants of Guillaume, also known as the family of the Guilhemids, several of whom were ardent defenders of the heresy. However, the Cathars have been idealized by numerous Illuminati propagandists as having been innocent victims of Church persecutions, but the Cathars rejected the God of the Bible, in favour of the worship of Lucifer and practiced witchcraft. It was the Cathars who influenced the heretical aspects of the Templars, for which the order was disbanded in 1307.

Part of this Kabbalistic revolution was the legends of the Holy Grail, which included Cathar and Templar themes, and formulated in the region of Aquitaine, another stronghold of the Guilhemids. The Holy Grail, or San Greal, should have been translated as Sang Real, or Royal Blood, because it referred to the sacred bloodline that supposedly issued from Guillaume de Gellone, and ultimately King David, but which in reality, was understood to represent the descendants of the Fallen Angels, and their leader, Lucifer.

The Sinclairs were descendants of Guillaume de Gellone, through his great-great-granddaughter, Poppa of Bavaria, who married the Viking leader, Rollo Ragnvaldsson. Among Rollo's descendants was William the Conqueror of Normandy. The Sinclairs, or St. Clair, were given various other castles around France. However, they all went to England with the Conqueror. One Sinclair, though, named William, did not like the Conqueror, so with some other discontented barons, he went to Scotland and placed himself in the service of King Malcolm III of Scotland.

Malcolm III King of Scotland was the father of David I "the Saint" King of Scotland. In 1128, soon after the Council of Troyes, Hugh de Payens, the Templars' first Grand Master, met with King David I of Scotland. King David later surrounded himself with Templars, and appointed them as "the Guardians of his morals by day and night".

David married the grand-daughter of Lambert II, the brother of Godefroi de Bouillon, leader of the first crusade, and the sister of sister of William the Conqueror. Godefroi's younger brother, Eustace III, married David's sister, Mary Scots. Their daughter married Stephen I King of England, the son Adela de Normandie, the daughter of William the Conqueror. Adela's brother, Henry I King of England, married David's sister, Editha of Scotland. Their daughter, Mathilda Empress of England, married Geoffrey V, Comte d'Anjou, whose son Henry II married Eleanor of Aquitaine.

King David granted Hugues and his knights the lands of Balantrodoch, by the Firth of Forth, but now renamed Temple, near the site of Rosslyn. And, legend has it that, when the Templars came under trial, their leader de Molay arranged for the Templar to return to Scotland, where they assisted Robert the Bruce at the Battle of Bannockburn.

Robert the Bruce claimed the Scottish throne as a great-great-great-great grandson of David. Walter Stewart, the sixth High Steward of Scotland, also played an important part in the Battle of Bannockburn. Walter Stewart then married Majory, daughter of Robert the Bruce, and their son Robert II of Scotland was heir to the House of Bruce; he eventually inherited the Scottish throne after his uncle David II of Scotland died.

In Scotland, the Templars served Robert the Bruce as members of the Scots Guard, of which two prominent families were those of the Stuarts and the Sinclairs. Henry Sinclair was a supporter of Robert the Bruce, and one of his descendants, William Sinclair, designed Rosslyn Chapel, a church in the village of Roslin, replete with occult symbolism, and believed to be one of the sites where the Grail might be buried. Finally, the Sinclairs became the Hereditary Grand Masters of the Masons of Scotland.

After Queen Elizabeth died without an heir, she was succeeded by the son of Mary Queen of Scots, James Stewart I of England, also known as King James. It is for this reason that the Freemasons of the eighteenth century conspired to back the Stuart cause, after their last monarch, James II Stuart, King of England, was deposed, and replaced by William of Orange. The Stuart cause then became the essence of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which regarded the Stuarts as the inheritors of the Templars, who had rescued the secret tradition of the East, otherwise known as the Kabbalah.

Since the late eighteenth century, however, the Illuminati have come under the leadership of the Rothschild family. The founder of the dynasty, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, ordered his sons to marry only their first cousins, continuing the careful intermarrying practiced by their predecessors.

However, the first exception was Hannah, the daughter of Amschel Mayer's son, the notorious Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who married the Rt. Hon. Henry Fitzroy, a direct descendant of Charles II Stuart King of England, the father of James II.

More recently, however, is the great-great-great grandson of Nathan Mayer, Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, who married Mary Serena Dunn. The mother of Mary Serena was Lady Mary Sybil St. Clair-Erskine, who was the daughter of James Francis Harry St. Clair-Erskine, 5th Earl of Rosslyn.

Rothschild, Buffet, Arnold, Supreme Court in IsraelJacob Rothschild is the current head of the UK Rothschild family, having inherited the fourth baronetcy from his father, Victor, an eminent zoologist, and sometime MI5 agent and friend of KGB agents Anthony Blunt and Guy Burgess. Jacob resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners.

Jacob Rothschild resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners. He is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which built and gave the Knesset government buildings and the Supreme Court to Israel, and chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide.

Jacob Rothschild is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide. Yad Hanadiv was also responsible for building and granting the Knesset government buildings, and the Supreme Court of Israel, which prominently features Masonic symbolism and the pyramid and all-seeing eye of the Illuminati.

Jacob Rothschild was a close personal friend of the Princess Diana, and maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. He knows Rupert Murdoch well, having been friends since the Australian newspaper proprietor first came to the UK in the 1960s. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Margaret Thatcher received French President François Mitterrand there at a summit in 1990. He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffet and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
About the Author

David Livingstone is an historian who lives in Montreal, Canada. He is the author of The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western Civilization.
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO...hild_Grail.htm
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 05:52 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 05:53 PM   #17
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

lets just zoom in on one wee bit from that article above:

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
In reality, they, like all the aristocratic bloodlines that form the core of the Illuminati, are descended from Guillaume de Gellone of the eighth century AD. Guillaume's father was Rabbi Makhir, among the Exilarchs who ruled the Jews in Baghdad, who was sent West after a dispute over the successorship. In France, he took the name Theodoric, married Alda, the aunt of Charlemagne, and was appointed “King of the Jews” in the region of the Languedoc, with his capital the city of Narbonne.
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 06:01 PM   #18
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
lets just zoom in on one wee bit from that article above:
If you read Livingstones work in totality, you will understand that the "Jews" who intermarried with the European royalty were Herodians/Edomites , which you can trace back to Alexander the Great.

So basically the whole "Jewish" thing is just one big ruse to hide the fact that we are actually just dealing with bloodlines that go back to Alexander the Great, and the same European royalty in the first place.

So in actuality we are being ruled by European elites that go back to Alexander the Great and the ancient Caesars. These elites we're dealing with the mystery religions/Kabbalah which had been acquired from Egyptian and Babylonian civilizations before them.

Last edited by vancity eagle; 24-02-2018 at 06:05 PM.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 06:05 PM   #19
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,740
Likes: 13,665 (7,883 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vancity eagle View Post
If you read Livingstones work in totality, you will understand that the "Jews" who intermarried with the European royalty were Herodians/Edomites , which you can trace back to Alexander the Great.

So basically the whole "Jewish" thing is just one big ruse to hide the fact that we are actually just dealing with bloodlines that go back to Alexander the Great, and the same European royalty in the first place.
you said it was the bible that said alexander was an 'edomite' (edom is outside of europe by the way)

and i told you before that the term 'kings of edom' is a qabalistic term used to denote imbalanced force

to call alexander the great a edomite is therefore a qabalistic insult

livingstone very clearly says they are jews and mentions 'rabbis' which are most definately of levantine origin not of european origin

you just want to hate on white people so much that you are willing to try and twist reality to fit your hatred!
__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 24-02-2018 at 06:07 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2018, 06:24 PM   #20
vancity eagle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,492
Likes: 4,419 (2,496 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
you said it was the bible that said alexander was an 'edomite' (edom is outside of europe by the way)

and i told you before that the term 'kings of edom' is a qabalistic term used to denote imbalanced force

to call alexander the great a edomite is therefore a qabalistic insult

livingstone very clearly says they are jews and mentions 'rabbis' which are most definately of levantine origin not of european origin

you just want to hate on white people so much that you are willing to try and twist reality to fit your hatred!

Edom literally means "ruddy skin" if you look at the Hebrew definition.

Yes there was a nation in the Middle East known as Edom, but the patriarch of the entire Edomite tribe is much older than the establishment of either Edom or the Hellenic nations. They didn't all stay in one place but branched out in to many other places.

I have never heard of any "kings of Edom" being a qabbalistic term, quite frankly I see no relevance to the documentation in the Bible and the Apocrypha(which was removed from Protestant bibles) that Alexander descended from Edomites.

It would make more sense why the Herodian Edomites were allied with Rome if they were actually blood relatives going back generations.

It would also make sense why you today have an alliance between "Jews" and the current day Roman Empire.

Apparently the Herodians also used the symbol of the eagle, which was also the symbol of Rome and America today.
vancity eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.