Chris Spivey False Flag Woowich Special!!

[howard crane]

Originally Posted by uprising

Very different angles, (maybe different takes) the building behind appears on the left on one, on the right on the other

This has already been established on the Woolwich 'Serious Incident' thread.

Two different angles.

Two different cameras hence no colours match. Not even the green of the grass is the same in the two images.

Google "colour grading" for an explanation.

[enlighten me]

Why is the CCTV camera on the corner shop blanked out on Google maps?
This camera footage would clearly show everything,





Why has none of this footage been posted on the internet?

There's a CCTV camera on every corner of this shop




Whoops Google forgot to blank out the camera from the other side of the street,



How long before these images are removed from imageshack? and google

[cont]

Originally Posted by howard crane

This has already been established on the Woolwich 'Serious Incident' thread.

Two different angles.

Two different cameras hence no colours match. Not even the green of the grass is the same in the two images.

Google "colour grading" for an explanation.

Thanks. I thought two cameras most likely.

Any explanation for the blood in the overhead shots - from different angles (unlikely to be photoshopped)?

[uprising]

Originally Posted by revlovejoy

The victim got no blood on him? You don't know that.

The killer? His jacket is soaked in it, especially around the pockets.

I know that because I've seen a clear picture, no sign of blood on or around the the body.
How can the killer get soaked in blood but not the body?

There is no sign of blood on the killer in the light coloured jacket either, even after supposedly being shot and his thumb hanging off due to his gun allegedly back firing.

Originally Posted by howard crane

This has already been established on the Woolwich 'Serious Incident' thread.

Two different angles.

Two different cameras hence no colours match. Not even the green of the grass is the same in the two images.

Google "colour grading" for an explanation.

I know they were different angles I hadn't seen the pictures side by side though before, so not noticed such a difference.

I don't need to google colour grading, I'm not an idiot.

[nongeekywebdude]

Originally Posted by uprising

It was staged, to fuel anti Muslim hatred and give justification to the murder of thousands of innocent people in Afghanistan etc.

yes I gather the view of many is that the event was staged, but if it was staged then what actually happened, how was it staged, was someone killed, were the two guys actually shot, were their actors involved etc etc

Some of the stuff does look fishy I must admit, especially the way people seem to be hanging around after the event and talking to guys that had just virtually beheaded someone, but what is the alternative explanation?

[revlovejoy]

Originally Posted by uprising

I know that because I've seen a clear picture, no sign of blood on or around the the body.
How can the killer get soaked in blood but not the body?

Post the picture. All the ones i've seen are at a distance, after he has lost a lot of blood and is probably dead. Plus he's wearing a dark top fleecy which would hide and soak up blood. . But if you have a close up, i shall look at it.

[uprising]

Originally Posted by nongeekywebdude

yes I gather the view of many is that the event was staged, but if it was staged then what actually happened, how was it staged, was someone killed, were the two guys actually shot, were their actors involved etc etc

Some of the stuff does look fishy I must admit, especially the way people seem to be hanging around after the event and talking to guys that had just virtually beheaded someone, but what is the alternative explanation?

Only those involved in the operation would know this, otherwise we can only theorise.

[uprising]

Originally Posted by revlovejoy

Post the picture. All the ones i've seen are at a distance, after he has lost a lot of blood and is probably dead. Plus he's wearing a dark top fleecy which would hide and soak up blood. . But if you have a close up, i shall look at it.

It was in Fridays sun, I've saved it but yes I've tried to find one equally as clear online but they are rather grainy, I'll try again though.

[kazg]

Without reading anybody elses opinions, (so i cant be influenced) im going to give mine.

i think, just like ol' rusty knickers death/funeral.... it is handy timing.

reckon we have 1 more death that will "shock the nation" to go before they move on to the next key tactic at getting the british sheeple to forget all about child abuse investigations and let them get back to the daily slog of grooming, bribing, noncing and murdering their way to the top of the political pile.

as for the hows, whys and wherefores....
its not tht difficult, to be fair to stir up a boiling pot of hatred and just leave it simmering. eventually, u Know its gonna spill over or burn, but hey.... why worry when ur missus is half way through packing for a nice early summer holiday, right...

[jason74]

Originally Posted by pinochio

When I first heard of the incident,,,I was skeptical,,I thought False flag,,then after reviewing the evidence I thought MAYBE it did happen as reported.
My current view is undecided but leaning towards elaborate hoax.
The body lying on the street has no signs of blood,which it should have after being hacked to pieces.The blood trail stops at the kirb

Has been pretty much the same process of thinking for me too.

And reading Spivey's article; the most obvious thing for me was the body itself. No visible signs of being 'hacked to bits'. Certainly the head is still attached to it(!!!!).

Wonder when Cameron and his cronies (in the Government and MSM) are going to be arrested for inciting racial hatred. Fat f*cking chance

[revlovejoy]

Originally Posted by uprising

It was in Fridays sun, I've saved it but yes I've tried to find one equally as clear online but they are rather grainy, I'll try again though.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ur-family.html

The one on this page?

Its probably pooling underneath him. There's blood and defence wounds on his hands and his sleeve is soaking in blood.

By the time they dragged him to the road he was probably dead, so not a lot more blood would pump out. No heart beat means blood seeps out slowly.

So what do you think happened? He was already dead in the back of the car, they brought the car in a truck, lowered it down, and someone shouted ACTION!!! and then they were away?

[ablitive]

Originally Posted by nongeekywebdude

So what are people suggesting actually happened in Woolwich then?

Holywood came to town.

The whole episode of the murder seems to be quite funny now.

I dread the repercussions, tightening the screws on the police state, bad enough as it is in the UK.

[uprising]

Originally Posted by revlovejoy

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...ur-family.html

The one on this page?

Its probably pooling underneath him. There's blood and defence wounds on his hands and his sleeve is soaking in blood.

By the time they dragged him to the road he was probably dead, so not a lot more blood would pump out. No heart beat means blood seeps out slowly.

So what do you think happened? He was already dead in the back of the car, they brought the car in a truck, lowered it down, and someone shouted ACTION!!! and then they were away?

Yes thank you, that's the one though the picture in the sun didn't show his hands.
I think it likely the blood on his hands was transferred from the alleged attackers when carried or dragged into position.

[bograt]

Hi no blood here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc62gkSN8W0

When viewing youtube videos, I've noticed that some videos that were freely available are now asking for age verification login. (in fact one link that I posted myself) I think they may be trying to harvest/identify those who are interested by requiring login to view.

[carbon]

The difference in the red colour between the two images has nothing to do with colour representation from the camera. It's been doctored after the filming, the less red hand has been desaturated around blood, or the red hand has been coloured red afterwards, but no, definitely not a feature of the two different cameras, that does not explain the massive discrepancies between the pairs of hands.

[sweetangel]

Another suspicious factor that resonates with me is the text that Lee Rigby sent his mother the night before his death:

‘Goodnight Mam, I hope you had a fantastic day today because you are the most fantastic and one in a million mum anyone could ever wish for'.

Very emotive to further pull at the nations heart strings?

[cont]

Originally Posted by carbon

The difference in the red colour between the two images has nothing to do with colour representation from the camera. It's been doctored after the filming, the less red hand has been desaturated around blood, or the red hand has been coloured red afterwards, but no, definitely not a feature of the two different cameras, that does not explain the massive discrepancies between the pairs of hands.

That's wrong. They are two different cameras from two different angles. The red hands picture also shows the red double lines on the road, which are really there, while the orange hand picture shows orange double lines of the road.

Edit: differences do look greater than simple explanation of different cameras though.

[hangthedj]

A really bad bit of (sick) theatre when 'hatchet man' moves his leg to it's 'proper' position over the marker.

All this rubbish about comforting a dead body...wtf...

How anyone can believe this nonsense is beyond me. Spivey has a couple of things wrong (e.g. the speech from 'hatchet man' being filmed twice - it was quite clearly the same performance captured by two different people for one) but overall, once again, is bang on the money.

Fuck me, it's embarrassing. They did an amazing job of keeping almost all traffic and non-actors away, but the actual theatre makes Sandy Hook look real by comparison.

Absolutely sickening to think that the soldier did die here, or elsewhere, and his family have been deceived. That's a very sensitive one so I try not to speculate there myself.

What's their next ploy going to be to spark the riots they so obviously want? To deflect from the ever-more-obvious Savile/Royal/BBC/MI5/paedo MP scandal, the internet crackdown, and to launch the war in the middle east that they want?

Tony Roma - spot on as per usual.

[chances of survival 0]

Originally Posted by bograt

Hi no blood here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc62gkSN8W0

When viewing youtube videos, I've noticed that some videos that were freely available are now asking for age verification login. (in fact one link that I posted myself) I think they may be trying to harvest/identify those who are interested by requiring login to view.

That is because someone took out the red with filters. Why someone would do that is beyond me, their are some sick fuckers out there messing with minds.

[blackwolf]

Were the people in the 1st pic' all really really cold!? all got coats zipped up to the neck, collars up and hats or hoods on, yet you can see the sunlight in the pic. maybe they dont want to be recognised!

Originally Posted by cosmo99

This Tent photo from the daily mail under the words "Investigation: Police officers search the scene following the attack in Woolwich which left Lee Rigby dead"



And this taken from AFP



Infact the tent was around the corner