Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > 9/11 & 7/7

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2009, 02:50 PM   #1
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default 4 Missing Titanium Engines

Hi,

Has anyone ever seen pictures, links, articles, videos or other material of the 4 titanium engines that SHOULD have "survived" the impact when the planes hit the WTC on 9/11.

If you have any material please post.

Thanks.
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 07:30 AM   #2
camreeno
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 6 (6 Posts)
Default

No one will bring them up, because they never existed. In the rubble at least.
camreeno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 08:36 AM   #3
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Thanks. I know. That's why I'm asking people to share any evidence they might have with regard to the engines.

The fact that for the past 8 years NO ONE has been able to produce anything conclusively proves - to me at least - that the "No planes theory" isn't pure crap as many believe.

Titanium airplane engines don't vanish into thin air...

They should have been recovered. No engines means No planes and therefore the 9/11 rabbit hole goes deeper then many realize. Still to this day.


Another interesting video with regard to the No Planes theory is September Clues
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ptember+clues#

Last edited by rjmt2012; 13-11-2009 at 02:14 PM.
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 10:38 AM   #4
fanoftruth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 444
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Sorry for the horrendousely long link but that contains some pictures of an engine down at ground zero that is reported to have been wreckage from Flight 175. Some have suggested it does not match that of a 767-200 model but the pics are there none the less :



http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?im...a%3DN%26um%3D1
fanoftruth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 11:37 AM   #5
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Thanks. I've seen these pictures a thousand times and the engine shown indeed does not match that of a Boeing 767. You can look it up yourself by the way.

Just go to Google images or whichever search engine you use, look up images of the engine of a Boeing 767 and compare those to the images on the link you provided. Or go to a library and look up material and images of Boeing engines there.

And besides, if that was indeed an engine of a Boeing 767, 4 should have been found. Not 1...


Pictures of Boeing a 767 engine:

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/...mages/img6.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1382/...c775c469_o.jpg

http://www.airleague.co.uk/images/b767.JPG
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 12:44 PM   #6
noewhan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 18 (14 Posts)
Default

Could it be possible that the engines got embedded in the floors, and then got melted during and after the collapse?
__________________
Anything goes - Cole Porter

I'm no pro.
noewhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2009, 01:10 PM   #7
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

No. Please look up the qualities and characteristics of titanium.
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2009, 03:18 AM   #8
secondsun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ...on the 9
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

there were many variants of the 767 and we can not be sure the 767 that hit the towers was the actual UA 175 767.... so can you post pic`s of all the variants? ( of engine )

P&W JT9D-7R4
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80A
GE CF6-80C2
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2
P&W JT9D-7R4
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80A
GE CF6-80C2
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2
RR RB211-524H
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2

....thanks in advance!
__________________
...Smile in the Face of Adversity! Full Poem

Last edited by secondsun; 15-11-2009 at 03:18 AM.
secondsun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2009, 11:53 AM   #9
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Silly question because you can look them up yourself.
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2009, 01:48 PM   #10
bryan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 121 (70 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by secondsun View Post
there were many variants of the 767 and we can not be sure the 767 that hit the towers was the actual UA 175 767.... so can you post pic`s of all the variants? ( of engine )

P&W JT9D-7R4
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80A
GE CF6-80C2
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2
P&W JT9D-7R4
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80A
GE CF6-80C2
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2
RR RB211-524H
P&W PW4000-94
GE CF6-80C2

....thanks in advance!
This post is out of character for secondsun. Not his style at all. It's more like the kind of diversion that mynameis used to post.

In any case, according to NIST, UA 175 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4D engines, which have a fan blade diameter of 94", a length of 153", and a dry weight of 8,885lb.

(NCSTAR 1-2B page 67)

Last edited by bryan; 15-11-2009 at 02:37 PM.
bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2009, 02:07 PM   #11
rjmt2012
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

For those who are seriously interested this is a really good interview with John Lear. He gives his view on 9/11 and many other topics which are also discussed on this forum.

Part 1 of 4



Part 2 of 4



Part 3 of 4


Part 4 of 4
rjmt2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.