Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Big Brother / Microchipping / Problem-Reaction-Solution

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-08-2017, 02:27 PM   #321
raburgeson
Senior Member
 
raburgeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 376 (252 Posts)
Default

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...-bing/3144029/

https://searchenginewatch.com/2016/0...earch-engines/

Of course you can get your own search engine. Get a browser that gives you privacy. Check out Opera. You may have heard Firefox is joining the stomped on. Go to oldapps and get some older copies of the browser before they become unavailable. Those 2 links above are examples. Searching for information you need is easy. Saving applications that came out before all the censorship is key in defeating it.

64 bit computers is one step being used to destroy many good programs. I have a lousy cd/dvd driver, it is slow and does not work well. I installed DX9c and the files asked for by the operating system to run the XP64 driver. All the files needed were on the XP disk except 2. You get the file not found 1 at a time. Find them and inject them into system X86 and system 64 and the next file request pops up. It's worth the time as I have gone from 10 minutes to make a DVD to 5 minutes and the 50% scrap rate on disks is gone.

Now I am going to make the program they are most scared of work on my computer. I am going to fudge windows so it runs Evidence Eliminator. They told you that the program was bad because it promoted theft. That was not true. If ran in dos mode it was the best program ever to protect your privacy. They lied again, isn't that precious.
raburgeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2017, 09:07 PM   #322
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Social Media is A Tool of the CIA: “Facebook, Google and Other Social Media Used to Spy on People”
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, August 28, 2017

A CBS news article published in 2011 entitled “Social Media Is a Tool of the CIA. Seriously” reveals the “unspoken truth” which the mainstream media including CBS have failed to address.

The CIA is “using Facebook, Twitter, Google (GOOG) and other social media to spy on people.”

This article published by CBS refutes the lies of the MSM (and CBS). It confirms the insidious relationship between the CIA, the Search Engines, Social Media and major advertising conglomerates: “You don’t need to wear a tinfoil hat to believe that the CIA is using Facebook, Twitter, Google (GOOG) and other social media to spy on people. That’s because the CIA publishes a helpful list of press releases [link inactive] on all the social media ventures it sponsors, via its technology investment arm In-Q-Tel. … “

The report acknowledges that “privacy” is threatened by the advertisers, yet at the same time these advertisers are “in bed with the CIA”, acting on behalf and in liaison with US intelligence.

Screenshot of CBS article

The Privatization of Spying

Spying on individuals is a highly profitable undertaking for private companies on contract to the CIA, NSA, Homeland Security. The CBS report suggests in no uncertain terms that the personal information pertaining to millions of Americans collected by one of the World’s largest ad agencies is sold to the CIA.

According to an earlier Wired News July 2010 report by Noam Schachtman:

THE INVESTMENT ARMS of the CIA and Google are both backing a company that monitors the web in real time — and says it uses that information to predict the future.

The company is called Recorded Future, and it scours tens of thousands of websites, blogs and Twitter accounts to find the relationships between people, organizations, actions and incidents — both present and still-to-come. In a white paper, the company says its temporal analytics engine “goes beyond search” by “looking at the ‘invisible links’ between documents that talk about the same, or related, entities and events.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/social-...people/5606170
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 31-08-2017 at 09:07 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2017, 05:04 PM   #323
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

The Multi Billion CIA Monopoly Company We All Need To Worry About

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 03:12 PM   #324
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Silicon Valley now rapidly abandoning the philosophy of “free speech” by turning to censorship, obedience and conformity
Sunday, September 03, 2017 by: Jayson Veley

It’s hard to believe that anyone would support tyranny over liberty, but sadly, millions of Americans across the country do. For the most part, this embrace of an all-powerful totalitarian state like the one described in George Orwell’s 1984 comes from the progressive left, who are committed to destroying everything from the freedom of speech, to states’ rights, to the right to bear arms. It’s unfortunate that they don’t realize how precious individual liberty really is, and how the type of fundamental transformation that they so desperately want to achieve has failed everywhere it has been tried.

Slowly but surely, the Internet is becoming less free as companies like Facebook and Google look for new ways to combat what they consider to be “hate speech” or “fake news,” even if the actual content is none of those things. Truth be told, the end goal is to suppress conservative voices that do not subscribe to the progressive ideology, and in order to accomplish that, companies must first surrender their dedication and respect for the First Amendment.

Last week, Wired published a story talking about how support for the freedom of speech in Silicon Valley is starting to become nonexistent. “As the CEO of a service with 700 million users, Systrom recognizes that he’s something like the benevolent dictator of a country more than twice the size of the U.S.” the Wired piece said in reference to Instagram CEO Kevin Systrom. “The choices he makes affect the lives of all his users – some of whom are insecure teens, some of whom are well-adjusted adults….”
read full article here http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-0...onformity.html
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 04:02 PM   #325
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

YouTube accused of CENSORSHIP over controversial new bid to ‘limit’ access to videos

Google-owned video site is taking steps to reduce the audience for content deemed 'inappropriate or offensive', but not illegal.
By Jasper Hamill
1st September 2017, 8:56 pm
Updated: 4th September 2017, 9:46 am

YOUTUBE has been accused of censorship after introducing a controversial new policy designed to reduce the audience for videos deemed to be "inappropriate or offensive to some audiences".

The Google-owned video site is now putting videos into a "limited state" if they are deemed controversial enough to be considered objectionable, but not hateful, pornographic or violent enough to be banned altogether.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/437217...ess-to-videos/
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2017, 06:56 PM   #326
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

who really owns google?

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:06 AM   #327
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Welcome to 1984: Big Brother Google now watching your every political move
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist. He is author of the book, 'Midnight in the American Empire,' released in 2013. [email protected]

Google has taken the unprecedented step of burying material, mostly from websites on the political right, that it has deemed to be inappropriate. The problem, however, is that the world's largest search engine is a left-leaning company with an ax to grind.

Let's face it, deep down in our heart of hearts we knew the honeymoon wouldn't last forever. Our willingness to place eternal faith in an earth-straddling company that oversees the largest collection of information ever assembled was doomed to end in a bitter divorce from the start. After all, each corporation, just like humans, has their own political proclivities, and Google is certainly no exception. But we aren't talking about your average car company here.

The first sign Google would eventually become more of a political liability than a public utility was revealed in 2005 when CEO Eric Schmidt (who is now executive chairman of Alphabet, Inc, Google's parent company) sat down with interviewer Charlie Rose, who asked Schmidt to explain "where the future of search is going."

Schmidt's response should have triggered alarm bells across the free world.

"Well, when you use Google, do you get more than one answer," Schmidt asked rhetorically, before answering deceptively. "Of course you do. Well, that's a bug. We have more bugs per second in the world. We should be able to give you the right answer just once... and we should never be wrong."

Really?

Think about that for a moment. Schmidt believes, counter-intuitively, that getting multiple possible choices for any one Google query is not the desirable prospect it should be (aren't consumers always in search of more variety?), but rather a "bug" that should be duly squashed underfoot. Silly mortal, you should not expect more than one answer for every question because the almighty Google, our modern-day Oz, "should never be wrong!" This is the epitome of corporate hubris. And it doesn't require much imagination to see that such a master plan will only lead to a colossal whitewashing of the historic record.

For example, if a Google user performs a search request for - oh, I don't know - 'what caused the Iraq War 2003,' he or she would be given, according to Schmidt's algorithmic wet dream, exactly one canned answer. Any guesses on what that answer would be? I think it's safe to say the only acceptable answer would be the state-sanctioned conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein was harboring weapons of mass destruction, an oft-repeated claim we now know to be patently false. The list of other such complicated events that also demand more than one answer - from the Kennedy assassination to the Gulf of Tonkin incident - could be continued for many pages.
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/402588-go...t-republicans/

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 10-09-2017 at 07:06 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:11 AM   #328
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

European Union Calls For Massive Internet Censorship
Ian Miles Cheong
2:20 AM 09/07/2017

A leaked document from the European Union reveals that the EU presidency is calling for massive internet censorship and filtering.

European Digital Rights (EDRi) reported on Wednesday that a Council of the European Union document leaked by Statewatch on August 30 reveals that Estonia, which is currently seated as the EU Presidency, has been pushing other member states to adopt all manner of internet surveillance.

The proposals, if adopted, call for European countries to follow in China’s footsteps regarding online censorship.

The directive calls on the EU to enact even stricter copyright laws, which EDRi says pushes pre-existing terms “further into the realms of illegality.”

The text contains “two options for each of the two most controversial proposals: the so-called ‘link tax’ or ancillary copyright, and the upload filter.” EDRi says both directives would be harmful to a free and open Internet.

The proposals are suggested as alternatives for 2014 legislation already introduced in Germany and Spain dubbed the “link tax,” (also known as the “Google tax”) which has the potential to undermine access to public domain works. The concept behind the tax was to charge online news sites that publish news snippets, such as Google News, to pay a fee for every publication they aggregate.

EDRi explains:

Option A maintains the Commission’s original proposal of having in place an upload filter which will be under the control of platforms and other companies that are hosting online content. Although it removes mentions to “content recognition technologies”, in reality, there is no way to “prevent the availability” (another expression which remains in the text) of certain content without scanning all the content first.

Option B is, at best, a more extreme version of Option A. In fact, it seems so extreme that it almost makes the first option look like a reasonable compromise. This may, of course, be the “diplomatic” strategy. In this extreme option, the text attacks again the liability regime of the e-commerce Directive – which, bizarrely, would not be repealed, leaving us with two contradictory pieces of EU law but adds a “clarification” of what constitutes a “communication to the public”. This clarification establishes that platforms (and its users) would be liable for the copyright infringing content uploaded by its users.

In other words, platforms like Twitter or YouTube could be held responsible for each and every piece of content uploaded by their users. Demanding that these websites vet each and every piece of content would not only cost too much, it is also impossible to do manually — even for tech giants.

Ian Miles Cheong is a journalist and outspoken media critic. You can reach him through social media at @stillgray on Twitter and on Facebook.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/07/eu...et-censorship/
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:14 AM   #329
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

The controlled demolition of the independent media

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:29 AM   #330
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

German federal police illegally collect data to blacklist journalists and activists
By Martin Kreickenbaum
4 September 2017

Germany’s Federal Criminal Police (BKA) are illegally storing masses of data regarding supposed “politically motivated crimes.” As broadcaster ARD reported, data on more than 100,000 people accused of such offenses is being held in a database called “Internal Security,” even though in the vast majority of cases, there has never been a charge, let alone a court proceeding. The ARD report suggests that the BKA is operating a “blacklist” of journalists and political activists classified as “left-wing extremists.”

Both the extent of the surveillance and the arbitrary and unconstitutional storage of such data are typical characteristics of an authoritarian police state. The BKA is combining the records of the secret service and various police bodies. Its enthusiasm for data hoarding goes beyond that of the Stasi (State Security Police) of the former East Germany.

The scandalous activity has come to light by chance. In the course of the G20 summit in Hamburg, a total of 32 journalists had their previously-issued accreditation withdrawn. The reason for this was said to be “security concerns.” Several journalists subsequently lodged a freedom of information request with the BKA. This showed that in most cases, the “concerns” were completely unfounded.
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../data-s04.html
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:36 AM   #331
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Spencer: Twitter Moves to Silence All Criticism of Islam
As Sharia continues to descend over the Internet.
9.8.2017

Remember Google’s old motto, “Don’t be evil”? It sounds so ironic now, with the social media giants all rushing to implement Sharia blasphemy restrictions and choke off all criticism of Islam. Twitter is working so hard to do this that it should adopt a new motto: “Be evil.”

Twitter certainly lives by that motto. It lets stand open death threats against me. It censors content to suit Iran’s Islamic authorities. It has flagged as “hateful” tweets stating the fact that Islam is not a religion of peace and reporting accurately about anti-Semitic statements by an imam. It has let Islamic State accounts stand while banning those of people who report terrorists. It has shadowbanned my account, preventing thousands of readers from seeing Jihad Watch posts.

And it isn’t just me, of course. Breitbart reported Monday that “a Muslim apostate and high profile campaigner against both female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage has been suspended from micro-blogging platform Twitter, amidst a wider crackdown on right wing voices on the website, and other online platforms like Facebook.”

The human rights activist in question, Shazia Hobbs, explained: “It’s absolutely disgusting. There was no reason given. Twitter would not tell me what tweets were in violation of their rules. They said it was because of ‘harassment’. All I tweet about is the rape of Pakistani children by Pakistani men.”
http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentar...riticism-islam
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 07:38 AM   #332
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Youtube censoring free speech

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-09-2017, 07:43 PM   #333
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Bullied BBC? Alternative media returns fire on claims it’s waging ‘war’ on the corporation
Published time: 28 Sep, 2017 11:24
Edited time: 28 Sep, 2017 13:25

Alternative media accused of waging “guerilla warfare” against the BBC by its former political editor Nick Robinson say they are just providing balance to the ‘biased’ government-funded corporation.

Writing for the Guardian, Robinson said criticism of the BBC is so persistent that it is affecting negatively public perceptions of the corporation and other mainstream media outlets.

“Our critics now see their attacks as a key part of their political strategy. In order to succeed, they need to convince people not to believe ‘the news,’” he wrote in the Guardian.

“Attacks on the media are no longer a lazy clap line delivered to a party conference to raise morale. They are part of a guerilla war being fought on social media, day after day and hour after hour.”

He claimed these alternatives include Wings over Scotland, which is pro-Independence; the New European, a pro-EU newspaper; the left-wing websites Novara Media, Skwawkbox, Evolve Politics and the Canary; and right-wing Breitbart rival Westmonster.

Drew Rose, Director of Operations at the Canary, said Robinson’s analogy that it is waging a war is apt but “it’s not the war he suggests.”

“For years now, swathes of the population have been ignored or otherwise failed by the established media. We’re fighting to serve those people,” Rose said in a statement to RT.

“We're doing that by helping to build a more diverse media operating outside the establishment. For us, ultimately, this is about democracy. And building informed consent, which democracy depends on, requires a healthy and diverse media that isn’t afraid to hold power to account."
https://www.rt.com/uk/404877-bbc-alt...ampaign=chrome
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-09-2017, 05:28 PM   #334
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Freedom of Speech: The New Evil - The David Icke Dot-Connector Videocast

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2017, 07:11 PM   #335
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

Tony and Richie get into the death of investigative journalism and then after 28 mins they discuss the new google algorithm which is wiping independent media articles off its index so people can't find them

Tony Gosling On Las Vegas Shooting, Catalan Referendum Violence, Edward Heath & More.

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2017, 09:42 AM   #336
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

YouTube moves to shut down all independent media coverage of Las Vegas shooting in desperate maneuver to protect the “official” narrative
Friday, October 06, 2017 by: Mike Adams

If you’ve been wondering whether the official story of how events transpired in the Las Vegas shooting was actually based in truth, wonder no more: YouTube has taken a bold move to shut down all independent media video coverage of the Mandalay Bay Massacre in a last ditch, desperate attempt to control the narrative.

According to the Wall Street Journal, YouTube search results were causing “debunked claims” about the Las Vegas massacre to rise to the top of some search results, and this annoyed Google to the point of taking swift action to censor those sources. According to the WSJ:

For example, the fifth result when searching “Las Vegas shooting” on YouTube late Tuesday yielded a video titled “Proof Las Vegas Shooting Was a FALSE FLAG attack—Shooter on 4th Floor.” The video said there were multiple shooters in Sunday’s mass shooting, a claim dismissed by law enforcement. Posted by a channel called the End Times News Report, it amassed more than 1.1 million views in about 27 hours.

The WSJ, not surprisingly, calls all real journalism an exercise in “conspiracy theories,” utterly clueless to the fact that if more than one person was involved in this Vegas shooting, it was a conspiracy by definition. The federal government charges thousands of people each year with conspiracy crimes, of course, and the entire left-wing media has been claiming for the last year that the U.S. government was taken over by a “conspiracy” involving President Donald Trump and the Russians. Isn’t it interesting how the media refuses to let go of all their favorite agenda-promoting conspiracy theories, even when they’ve been thoroughly debunked by the evidence? To the media, a “conspiracy theory” simply means something they don’t want people to read, see or discuss. The institution that has actually been debunked in the last year is the media itself.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-...narrative.html
__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 12:36 AM   #337
raburgeson
Senior Member
 
raburgeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 376 (252 Posts)
Default Where did you find the truth?

Staggering around like a bunch of drunks it seems we are victims of the original concerns in the first post. We have watched the alternative media battle censorship globally. I'm waiting to hear that you have red and blue lines marking your homes next. Things start in a country and slowly get deployed to the rest. As your children can be grabbed by social workers and put in dangerous homes it has spread. Those blue and red marked homes will spread too. They are leaving the Western USA and coming to your block. To make it short and sweet all the concerns in the first post are implemented somewhere and spreading. We might have staggered but, we got there.
raburgeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 12:53 AM   #338
raburgeson
Senior Member
 
raburgeson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 376 (252 Posts)
Default

Social media does not stop at the CIA. It has even gone beyond shared intelligence shared by agencies, they even pipe their paranoia to their (coined) first responders. All that spying they have done is now being shuffled to the civilian world. Imagine they listed you as a suspected terrorist and the cops pull you over for a burnt out tail light. How will you be treated. Remember that they were going to include people that wear bluejeans on that list.
raburgeson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 08:33 PM   #339
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 18,105
Likes: 9,904 (5,614 Posts)
Default

UK to fight 'hate crimes' online: Is it a threat to freedom of speech? (DEBATE)



'Like' 1984: Facebook says policing fake news could create Orwellian reality

__________________
''You're free to get as offended as you like''- Mark Passio

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” –George Orwell
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2017, 11:54 AM   #340
the apprentice
Senior Member
 
the apprentice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 21,569
Likes: 2,446 (1,692 Posts)
Default

Speaks for itself.

the apprentice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.