Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > New Members Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28-10-2018, 05:09 PM   #1
OPTICAL AUDIO ENGINEER
Premier Subscribers
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 19
Likes: 7 (6 Posts)
Default The jewskin

May i trouble you here for a moment of your time.We are led by others to beleive there view that jews run the world.GVTS ARMY UK USA MI6 CIA FBI FEMA POLICE ALL OVER THE WORLD.Who is to blame all of us, are the suckers who took the bribes.There must be some good people all over the world who know what is happening yet do nothing.It is good work that mister david ike as done exposeing the indecentcies that these people have done.I must admit that the book ive just read put more clearly to me and i hope to many others who arent wearing foggy goggles that theres a plan being forced upoun the human population,with out our consent.However as it happens in this trip to this earth in my present form i dont accept the jewskin rule from the zionist propaganda baby machine.
WOULD IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF THEY WERE CHRISTIAN MUSLIM ETC ETC.
OK NEXT BOOK NEARLY DONE
Likes: (1)
OPTICAL AUDIO ENGINEER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 10:16 AM   #2
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

We are really talking about a conspiracy among the oligarchs not among all jews. Blaming all jews is completely wrong and each person should be taken as an individual with their own views and beliefs and treated accordingly. There may be many jews who don't agree with the oligarchs vision for society.

What we are seeing is an ideological push by what prof Anthony Sutton called 'corporate socialists'

These are the guys who own the big banks and the big oil companies and who own the private banks which make up the central bank cartels

Their vision is for global COLLECTIVISM

They want a global socialist state run by them where all people are controlled from the top down by the state which enforces its will through a technocracy

Those people as journalist james corbett has shown in his work are the same people who funded the eugenics movement since BEFORE the nazis and they have also discussed population control through their 'club of rome'

Those people have invested massive sums into buying up market share of the corporate media so that they can control the narratives and thereby control public perception

They want to shut down any dissenting voice that can threaten their control over the narratives and the internet offers the public an avenue of discussion and access to information that is outside the control of those corporate media bohemoths and that is why the 'corporate socialists' are seeking to shut down free speech, control the internet and demonise 'conspiracy theories'

So when they say trump colluded with russia that is not a 'conspiracy theory' but when we say sheldon adelson an arch zionist funds trump and that the real collusion is with israel then THAT is a 'conspiracy theory'

But the REAL QUESTION we should asking is: WHAT IS THE TRUTH?

The truth is quashed in the ideological struggle which takes place on the battlefield of NARRATIVES. if the struggle was an honest one they would not need to weave narratives as they could simply explain their ideas and vision for society to the public and let the public decide for themselves but they do not intend to let people decide for themselves

All this recent talk of 'anti-semitism' is focussed on saying that there are people pushing 'anti-semitic' 'conspiracy theories' online ie that people are now realising that there is a push by 'corporate socialists' like the rothschilds, warburgs, rockefellers, oppenheimers, schiffs, harrimans etc to impose their vision for the world on people but what none of these corporate media talking heads ask is WHY people are discussing those things

This is because they do not want an exploration of the facts surrounding these 'theories' they just want to shut down any voices that question their corporate socialist vision of a technocratic future

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 29-10-2018 at 10:17 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 10:21 AM   #3
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

A deeper layer of the conspiracy is the idea that this vision for a global government is an old idea that has been kept alive within secret societies for centuries

A further layer discussed by conspiracy theorists AND occultists is what those secret societies are upto behind closed doors for example communicating with discarnate intelligences

This then of course implies that those discarnate intelligences are the driving force behind the global plan of control and that the humans implementing it are their conduits

some would call these entities 'extra-terrestrials', some would call them 'djinn', some would call them 'archons' and some would call them 'demons'

Its my personal belief that the artificial intelligence that is being created by the corporate socialist cabal is a manifestation in this physical realm of that force in the unseen dimension which to anyone unfamiliar to the occult is going to sound totally far out there and like something that might be found in some sort of comic but the reality is that comics have often taken their ideas from occult literature

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 29-10-2018 at 10:21 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 03:59 PM   #4
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 680 (479 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
A deeper layer of the conspiracy is the idea that this vision for a global government is an old idea that has been kept alive within secret societies for centuries

A further layer discussed by conspiracy theorists AND occultists is what those secret societies are upto behind closed doors for example communicating with discarnate intelligences

This then of course implies that those discarnate intelligences are the driving force behind the global plan of control and that the humans implementing it are their conduits

some would call these entities 'extra-terrestrials', some would call them 'djinn', some would call them 'archons' and some would call them 'demons'

Its my personal belief that the artificial intelligence that is being created by the corporate socialist cabal is a manifestation in this physical realm of that force in the unseen dimension which to anyone unfamiliar to the occult is going to sound totally far out there and like something that might be found in some sort of comic but the reality is that comics have often taken their ideas from occult literature
Usually I would call such communicators spiritualist and mediums, not occultists, yet to many (the usual paranoid churchy types ) these people would be accused of using dark and occult power. Also note that while you try and bring this back to qabbalah and judaism that the torah prohibits people from trying to contact the dead.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.

Last edited by JustMe418; 29-10-2018 at 04:00 PM.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 04:47 PM   #5
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe418 View Post
Usually I would call such communicators spiritualist and mediums, not occultists, yet to many (the usual paranoid churchy types ) these people would be accused of using dark and occult power. Also note that while you try and bring this back to qabbalah and judaism that the torah prohibits people from trying to contact the dead.
i wasn't talking about communicating with the dead
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 09:47 PM   #6
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 680 (479 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
i wasn't talking about communicating with the dead
Same principle
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2018, 11:02 PM   #7
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe418 View Post
Same principle
the torah requires people to worship an entity though

EPHOD...from wikipedia:

An ephod (Hebrew: ??????? ’êp???; /??f?d/ or /?i?f?d/) was an artifact and an object to be revered in ancient Israelite culture, and was closely connected with oracular practices and priestly ritual.

In the Books of Samuel and Books of Chronicles, David is described as wearing an ephod when dancing in the presence of the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6:14, 1 Chronicles 15:27) and one is described as standing in the sanctuary at Nob, with a sword behind it (1 Samuel 21:9). In the book of Exodus and in Leviticus one is described as being created for the Jewish High Priest to wear as part of his official vestments (Exodus 28:4+, 29:5, 39:2+; Leviticus 8:7).

Besides use as a garment, an Ephod was also used for oracular purposes, in conjunction with Urim and Thummim;[5] the books of Samuel imply that whenever Saul or David wished to question God via oracular methods, they asked a priest for the ephod.[5] Since the oracular process is considered by scholars to have been one of cleromancy, with the Urim and Thummim being the objects which were drawn as lots, the Ephod is considered by scholars to have been some form of container for the Urim and Thummim;[2][5] to harmonise this with the descriptions of the Ephod as a garment, it is necessary to conclude that the Ephod must have originally been some sort of pocket, which the priests girded to themselves.[1][2] However, the biblical text states the Urim and Thummim were placed in the breastplate, not the ephod (Leviticus 8:8). The integration of the stones in the breastplate, as well as the Hebrew usage of "Urim" as "lights," suggest that the Urim and Thummim may have been a type of ocular device through which the priest would look when receiving divine communication.[6]

The object at Nob, which must have been somewhat freestanding since another object is kept behind it, and the objects made by Gideon and by Micah, from molten gold, logically cannot have just been garments.[1][2] The object made by Gideon is plainly described as having been worshipped, and therefore the idol of some deity (possibly of Yahweh), while the object made by Micah is closely associated with a Teraphim, and the Ephod and Teraphim are described interchangeably with the Hebrew terms pesel and massekah, meaning graven image, and molten image, respectively.[1][2]

Even the ephods used for oracular purposes were not necessarily just pieces of cloth, as they are not described as being worn, but carried (though some translations render 1 Samuel 2:28 as wear an ephod rather than carry an ephod[4]); the Hebrew term used in these passages for carry is nasa, which specifically implies that the Ephod was carried either in the hand or on the shoulder.[2] The conclusion thus is that Ephod, in these cases, referred to a portable idol, which the lots were cast in front of;[1][2] some scholars have suggested that the connection between the idol and the garment is that the idol was originally clothed in a linen garment, and the term Ephod gradually came to describe the idol as a whole.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephod
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 29-10-2018 at 11:09 PM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2018, 10:38 AM   #8
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 680 (479 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
the torah requires people to worship an entity though

EPHOD...from wikipedia:

An ephod (Hebrew: ??????? ’êp???; /??f?d/ or /?i?f?d/) was an artifact and an object to be revered in ancient Israelite culture, and was closely connected with oracular practices and priestly ritual.

In the Books of Samuel and Books of Chronicles, David is described as wearing an ephod when dancing in the presence of the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6:14, 1 Chronicles 15:27) and one is described as standing in the sanctuary at Nob, with a sword behind it (1 Samuel 21:9). In the book of Exodus and in Leviticus one is described as being created for the Jewish High Priest to wear as part of his official vestments (Exodus 28:4+, 29:5, 39:2+; Leviticus 8:7).

Besides use as a garment, an Ephod was also used for oracular purposes, in conjunction with Urim and Thummim;[5] the books of Samuel imply that whenever Saul or David wished to question God via oracular methods, they asked a priest for the ephod.[5] Since the oracular process is considered by scholars to have been one of cleromancy, with the Urim and Thummim being the objects which were drawn as lots, the Ephod is considered by scholars to have been some form of container for the Urim and Thummim;[2][5] to harmonise this with the descriptions of the Ephod as a garment, it is necessary to conclude that the Ephod must have originally been some sort of pocket, which the priests girded to themselves.[1][2] However, the biblical text states the Urim and Thummim were placed in the breastplate, not the ephod (Leviticus 8:8). The integration of the stones in the breastplate, as well as the Hebrew usage of "Urim" as "lights," suggest that the Urim and Thummim may have been a type of ocular device through which the priest would look when receiving divine communication.[6]

The object at Nob, which must have been somewhat freestanding since another object is kept behind it, and the objects made by Gideon and by Micah, from molten gold, logically cannot have just been garments.[1][2] The object made by Gideon is plainly described as having been worshipped, and therefore the idol of some deity (possibly of Yahweh), while the object made by Micah is closely associated with a Teraphim, and the Ephod and Teraphim are described interchangeably with the Hebrew terms pesel and massekah, meaning graven image, and molten image, respectively.[1][2]

Even the ephods used for oracular purposes were not necessarily just pieces of cloth, as they are not described as being worn, but carried (though some translations render 1 Samuel 2:28 as wear an ephod rather than carry an ephod[4]); the Hebrew term used in these passages for carry is nasa, which specifically implies that the Ephod was carried either in the hand or on the shoulder.[2] The conclusion thus is that Ephod, in these cases, referred to a portable idol, which the lots were cast in front of;[1][2] some scholars have suggested that the connection between the idol and the garment is that the idol was originally clothed in a linen garment, and the term Ephod gradually came to describe the idol as a whole.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephod
Well when you think, the ark had images of cherubim mounted on it, which are a form of idol. Dont know if you have seen it but there is an excellent scholarly work on youtube which shows the pagan origins of Judaism (and by extension christianity)

I though urim and thummim were mounted on the shoulders and connected to the breastplate by a chain? anyhoo, I have heard they were used for divination but maybe it was simply a case of them being cast, one for a yes answer and one for a no answer.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2018, 11:44 AM   #9
iamawaveofthesea
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: under the raven banner
Posts: 25,692
Likes: 13,242 (7,608 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe418 View Post
Well when you think, the ark had images of cherubim mounted on it, which are a form of idol. Dont know if you have seen it but there is an excellent scholarly work on youtube which shows the pagan origins of Judaism (and by extension christianity)
have you got a link for that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe418 View Post
I though urim and thummim were mounted on the shoulders and connected to the breastplate by a chain? anyhoo, I have heard they were used for divination but maybe it was simply a case of them being cast, one for a yes answer and one for a no answer.
is there possibly some form of scrying going on with the stones?

nostradamus was a kabbalist who was using some sort of meditative practise to induce an altered state of consciousness from which he had his visions
__________________
I believe the public should have a say in their own fate and that is why i support free speech. Any media talking heads who argue that free speech must be curbed are arguing that the public should not be allowed a say in their own fate

Last edited by iamawaveofthesea; 30-10-2018 at 11:55 AM.
iamawaveofthesea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2018, 12:51 PM   #10
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 680 (479 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamawaveofthesea View Post
have you got a link for that?



is there possibly some form of scrying going on with the stones?

nostradamus was a kabbalist who was using some sort of meditative practise to induce an altered state of consciousness from which he had his visions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZECezMYug8c

Nostradamus ( who was a jew who had to hide as a catholic to avoid persecution) apparently used something like a bowl of water that was mounted on a tripod. Scrying isnt a specifically kabbalistic thing. If the stones were meant to be yes or no then all you would have to do is ask the question then throw them. The truth is that nobody really knows how they were used.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.

Last edited by JustMe418; 30-10-2018 at 01:07 PM.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2018, 02:12 PM   #11
JustMe418
Senior Member
 
JustMe418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 680 (479 Posts)
Default

Come on mr Wave, Im shocked you have nothing to say about the video.
__________________
I shoot up vertically like an arrow, and become that Above. But it is death, and the flame of the pyre. Ascend in the flame of the pyre, O my soul! Thy God is like the cold emptiness of the utmost heaven, into which thou radiatest thy little light.
JustMe418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.