Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Entertainment Industry

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26-05-2015, 03:18 PM   #201
phrased eyebrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 30 (29 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alf hearted View Post
Using someone dressed similarly to help them escape a venue is a different matter entirely to having near-exact doubles who could fill in for them in interviews or on stage.
Not the same thing.

The little girl wanted out of the production, and her family fled the country.

The production company threatened to replace her with a double to continue filming.

Ms O'Brien's family was eventually found and were convinced to return and finish shooting the movie. "they used 'doubles' in those days" she says on the commentary. Yeah? well I believe the beatles people pre and after apple corporation used doubles also.

Last edited by phrased eyebrow; 26-05-2015 at 03:23 PM.
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:20 PM   #202
alf hearted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,152
Likes: 109 (86 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phrased eyebrow View Post
You have no idea about what I am describing.
Describe it properly and we'll see.
alf hearted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:31 PM   #203
decode reality
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 24,061
Likes: 4,369 (2,796 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elenita View Post
I do agree with you, I was just saying that it was the McCann case that got me REALLY thinking. And 9/11, of course!
Thanks for clearing that up.
decode reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:34 PM   #204
decode reality
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 24,061
Likes: 4,369 (2,796 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ima gene View Post
Quote:[IMG][/IMG]
Originally Posted by decode reality
Compared to the ongoing story of the McCanns, I have to say the stuff about 'Paul is dead' is extremely trivial. Which is fine, for a bit of light entertainment".


Why?
Is one "potential" sacrifice more trivial than another?
Sorry ima_gene, but whenever people have to resort to posting a mini photo exhibition on a thread as 'evidence', (where you can barely even see the images anyway, and the post just gets lop-sided) it leaves me even less convinced than before.

In response to your question above, I still say the issue is nothing more than a bit of pop trivia, something for an esoteric gossip column, perhaps. If you're too close to it in an obsessive way, it appears to be more important than it is.

Last edited by decode reality; 26-05-2015 at 03:37 PM.
decode reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:40 PM   #205
phrased eyebrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 30 (29 Posts)
Default

A friend of mine has a Beatles calendar, and it's humorous to look at the photos especially if one is able to see through to the "corrections" (photoshop tweaks) so early beatle paul looks more like sir paul. the shading is deliberately off on the individual shots as course of in-your-face presentation.

If you don't "get it" or choose to deny same, that's your problem. Ignore it and call it gossip if you prefer. I tried to tell my Beatle bud about the swap and he wouldn't hear of it so we don't talk about that any more. We both still can agree on the music.

Last edited by phrased eyebrow; 26-05-2015 at 03:42 PM.
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:46 PM   #206
decode reality
Inactive
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 24,061
Likes: 4,369 (2,796 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phrased eyebrow View Post
A friend of mine has a Beatles calendar, and it's humorous to look at the photos especially if one is able to see through to the corrections so early beatle paul looks more like sir paul.

If you don't "get it" or choose to deny same, that's your problem. Ignore it and call it gossip if you prefer. I tried to tell my Beatle bud about the swap and he wouldn't hear of it so we don't talk about it any more.
I'm more bemused than anything else. The thread has been running for a while, there's been others like it, and today is the first time I've posted on any of them. From where I sit I don't see what objective goal or end there is to the speculation, it's like one of those 'God vs atheism' threads that just go 'round in circles. Perhaps that's the 'goal' - to keep going around in circles.

So I'll leave you to it and just watch these threads come and go without contributing from now on. Unsubscribed.

Last edited by decode reality; 26-05-2015 at 03:47 PM.
decode reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 03:47 PM   #207
alf hearted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,152
Likes: 109 (86 Posts)
Default

Elvis Presley's death didn't harm his record sales, so why wouldn't The Beatles management/handlers milk Paul's death similarly, had it actually happened? What was the reasoning behind replacing him? Was it purely monetary, or part of a long-term planned objective?
alf hearted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-05-2015, 04:34 PM   #208
phrased eyebrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 30 (29 Posts)
Default

Personally I don't think he was killed. I believe "Paul" wanted out, whether he kept writing songs or not, to retreat to a life of seclusion.

Good point about using doubles to distract attention from throngs of crowds. Perhaps the lads were so adept as swapping out that they used that as a method to bring in the new. Whatever that means.

Elvis example is good, but they didn't have that to refer to.
FWIW, I bought Elvis' last single along with my (first, LP) purchase of Revolver in 1977.
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 03:53 AM   #209
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phrased eyebrow View Post
A friend of mine has a Beatles calendar, and it's humorous to look at the photos especially if one is able to see through to the "corrections" (photoshop tweaks) so early beatle paul looks more like sir paul. the shading is deliberately off on the individual shots as course of in-your-face presentation.
Care to post some of those pictures for us to see?
kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 04:59 AM   #210
kizzie
Registered Users
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Posts: 5,486
Likes: 3,708 (1,807 Posts)
Default

I always feel these are the types of CT that tptb throw out there to make CTs look like nutters. Things like this and Diana didnt die she is Elton Johns husband now.. President's wife is a transexual.

When this type of thing gets banded about, people just lump all the theories together and do not believe any of them, When people on other forums start any threads of any CT, other members start jeering and saying "you believe Paul is a fake blah blah". always takes the threads off track, and the result is always the same.. Everyone laughing and missing the real CT right under their noses.
__________________
When you stop watching what they want you to watch you stop thinking what they want you to think.. Then you see a world that is nothing like they tell you it is.

Last edited by kizzie; 27-05-2015 at 05:00 AM.
kizzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 10:20 AM   #211
alf hearted
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,152
Likes: 109 (86 Posts)
Default

It'd be nice if all CT's had been reviewed by a panel of say 20 CT-inclined analysts and separated into "potentially feasible" and "utter bollocks" piles. There is definitely a need for some kind of filter that accounts for the fact that some people have no filters at all and will absorb any old shite.
alf hearted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 01:57 PM   #212
phrased eyebrow
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 30 (29 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi_ View Post
Care to post some of those pictures for us to see?
I don't post pictures I take myself due to privacy concerns. If you cannot truly see a difference in the appearance of the false paul, or of the retooling of early photos (see my avatar) to make early paul appear as later paul, there's nothing I can do to change your fixed mind.

There's a group of posters who feel the need to prop up certain viewpoints. It's not like you are losing ground and don't have better to do. Go make the world a better place already.

Say the same of me? fine. Why am I posting in response?
Because this thread has no life on this board and deserved more.
Likes: (1)
phrased eyebrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 05:10 PM   #213
ima gene
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 148 (86 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by decode reality View Post
I'm more bemused than anything else. The thread has been running for a while, there's been others like it, and today is the first time I've posted on any of them. From where I sit I don't see what objective goal or end there is to the speculation, it's like one of those 'God vs atheism' threads that just go 'round in circles. Perhaps that's the 'goal' - to keep going around in circles.

So I'll leave you to it and just watch these threads come and go without contributing from now on. Unsubscribed.
I make you right.
It's just one big headache for me.
I ain't the man who souled the world, but I know who did.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=fregObNcHC8

Love the 3 beatles. You dig??


.


.
__________________
The real enemy is the megalomaniac globalists that in their "wisdom" perceives themselves as informed, and thus entitled to play a game of global chess on our behalf.

Last edited by ima gene; 27-05-2015 at 08:03 PM.
ima gene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 07:34 PM   #214
pound
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 6,466
Likes: 475 (261 Posts)
Default

This 1988 movie pretty much lays it all out. Give it a watch asap:

__________________
"Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes." -- Carl Jung
"The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" -- George Simmel
pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 09:15 PM   #215
techman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 1,228 (681 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kizzie View Post
I always feel these are the types of CT that tptb throw out there to make CTs look like nutters. Things like this and Diana didnt die she is Elton Johns husband now.. President's wife is a transexual.

When this type of thing gets banded about, people just lump all the theories together and do not believe any of them, When people on other forums start any threads of any CT, other members start jeering and saying "you believe Paul is a fake blah blah". always takes the threads off track, and the result is always the same.. Everyone laughing and missing the real CT right under their noses.
Yep I agree with you on that. I think this is what happened once during my media course at college a few yrs. I came into the class one day, and the thing the tutor began talking to the class about was conspiracy theories, really odd thing to talk about. I was like " ohh, I like the sound of thus", but we were treated to the typical "top 10 conspiracies" list and of course amongst them was the usual "Paul McCartney died in 66 in a car crash then got replaced by someone called William Campbell" theory. I of course had heard of it, but the others hadnt and the look on their faces was like "what?, hahaha". The other CTs included 911, Princess Diana, and the Titanic/Olympic swap. Talking about these things in a class of immature 16-18 yr olds isn't good. Why this subject was brought up I will never know, though my tin foil paranoia hat tells me that someone high up in the college wanted this to be mentioned in order to stop these "crazy" ideas being branded about as though they feel they are damaging. To me it shows these subjects are being discussed.

Last edited by techman; 27-05-2015 at 09:23 PM.
techman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2015, 12:36 AM   #216
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techman View Post
Yep I agree with you on that. I think this is what happened once during my media course at college a few yrs. I came into the class one day, and the thing the tutor began talking to the class about was conspiracy theories, really odd thing to talk about. I was like " ohh, I like the sound of thus", but we were treated to the typical "top 10 conspiracies" list and of course amongst them was the usual "Paul McCartney died in 66 in a car crash then got replaced by someone called William Campbell" theory. I of course had heard of it, but the others hadnt and the look on their faces was like "what?, hahaha". The other CTs included 911, Princess Diana, and the Titanic/Olympic swap. Talking about these things in a class of immature 16-18 yr olds isn't good. Why this subject was brought up I will never know, though my tin foil paranoia hat tells me that someone high up in the college wanted this to be mentioned in order to stop these "crazy" ideas being branded about as though they feel they are damaging. To me it shows these subjects are being discussed.
I feel that the Paul is Dead theory was established to take all of the strange things the people were noticing about the Beatles in the terms of the Crowley influence, the backwards messages, the subliminal and sublime, because tying all of those things together leads you to suspect that there is a plan or agenda behind the Beatles, and that leads to Intelligence agencies and government influence and involvement. Even the most ardent believer of Beatles lore would have to accept that there was a great deal invested in their success, and that the Royal family backed them as well. That shows that people in very high places had a vested interest in the Beatles, and not just for the lucrative gains.

The Paul Is Dead theory comes to a dead end and is not plausible as laid out, so why is it as popular as anything else about the Beatles? It was an "established" conspiracy theory created to throw people off the trail that the "clues" people were finding would ultimately lead them. Hence this thread.

Once again, the Beatles ushered in and ended the era we know as "the Sixties". They came in as a ray of optimism and went out as the band that allegedly influenced a group of young people to go on a murder spree -- because of the hidden meanings and messages in their music, further enhanced by the LSD that the Beatles helped to influence a whole generation to partake in. Who patented LSD? The CIA. Who mass produced the first mega lot? Sandoz Laboratories.....

Why the doubles and the fakery? For conditioning people to not pay attention to subtle differences in the appearance of famous people so as to render them interchangeable. Again, these kinds of questions and answers lead to one probability -- government/intelligence involvement. The Beatles were supposed to be vanguards, anti Establishment. They were working for the "man". It's a big part of spy and or espionage work to use stand ins, or to alter one's appearance..... The Beatles experiment was quite obviously a huge success.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2015, 05:19 AM   #217
kiwi_
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 162 (99 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pound View Post
This 1988 movie pretty much lays it all out. Give it a watch asap:

lol

I get the feeling you'll like this movie.

kiwi_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2015, 12:27 AM   #218
pound
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 6,466
Likes: 475 (261 Posts)
Default

Jim Fetzer of Veterans Today fame is going to release a book on PID in the near future according to his latest interview with Jeff Rense. Fetzer and Rense start talking about PID and the use of body doubles by politicians, intelligence agencies and various other well known people starting at the 9:50 mark (the conversation momentarily turns to other topics but quickly goes back to PID etc at around 21:00..so keep listening):



An earlier interview/presentation from April with Jim Fetzer and Clare Kuehn:

__________________
"Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes." -- Carl Jung
"The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" -- George Simmel

Last edited by pound; 30-05-2015 at 01:12 AM.
pound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2015, 01:35 AM   #219
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pound View Post
Jim Fetzer of Veterans Today fame is going to release a book on PID in the near future according to his latest interview with Jeff Rense. Fetzer and Rense start talking about PID and the use of body doubles by politicians, intelligence agencies and various other well known people starting at the 9:50 mark (the conversation momentarily turns to other topics but quickly goes back to PID etc at around 21:00..so keep listening):



An earlier interview/presentation from April with Jim Fetzer and Clare Kuehn:

I'd be interested to read it if/when it comes out. I wasn't quite clear on if he actually thinks McCartney died and was replaced, or if he's suggesting doubles were used. Good interviews in any case, not just about PID theories.
ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2015, 10:11 PM   #220
ronisron
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,108
Likes: 2,842 (1,323 Posts)
Default

More doubles?



ronisron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.