Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Exposing Child Abuse

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16-10-2013, 06:06 PM   #41
invisibleman
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

I saw a blonde haired girl once.

Should i of reported it to the police?. it sure seems like a lot of folk did exactly this.
invisibleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2013, 11:10 PM   #42
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkick View Post
I thought along these lines for a while. While I`m not saying 100% for sure she did not exist, the amount of fake photograph of Maddie leaves a lot of doubt in my mind. Same as recent events such as Sandy Hook there are a few similarities.


KM hand looks a little odd?



http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t67...s-4th-may-2007


Look at MM foot strange shadow also shadow on Aunt?


Body look a tad large for a 3 yo?

Here are a few links below for those interested.

http://s574.photobucket.com/user/Thr...?sort=6&page=1

http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot...otos-last.html

http://s274.photobucket.com/user/cur...?sort=3&page=1

http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot...hotos-why.html
Fantastic. Absolutely Fantastic.

Madeleine McCann Never existed!
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-10-2013, 11:16 PM   #43
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Brilliant links.
This proves it 100% to me.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 12:48 PM   #44
jkick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 34 (12 Posts)
Default

Daily Mail
'Our friend Kate McCann, the perfect mum,' two of her closest friends speak out



A family photo of Kate McCann as a child. Kate is pictured (left) with her friend Nicky Gill outside a zoo.

KM hair looks a little odd, the center parting only goes halfway down her head?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...speak-out.html
jkick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 01:01 PM   #45
Dude111
Senior Member
 
Dude111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,800
Likes: 1,148 (729 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkick
Like I posted earlier, I`m not 100% on this, but it`s interesting how the Parker girls are called Emilie and Madeleine. The McCann girls are called Madeleine and Amelie.
Wow I didnt even realise that!!!!!
Dude111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 02:54 PM   #46
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkick View Post
Like I posted earlier, I`m not 100% on this, but it`s interesting how the Parker girls are called Emilie and Madeleine. The McCann girls are called Madeleine and Amelie.
GTFOOH! That is more than interesting! That is what is called giving the game away!!!!!!

Emilie and Amelie = Am A LIE or I'm A Lie.

Emilie parker never existed! Sandyhook is a proven hoax with no injuries or victims. And wasn't it made more obvious for us this time?

out of the parker girls, Madeleine is real (true) and Emilie is not.
and out of the McCann girls, Amelie is real (true) and Madeleine is not.

They are telling us Madeleine (made (en) Lie) Is A Lie.

She never existed. She is a computer generated rendering!
And they always wanted you to know! Eventually.

from the link you posted; http://thelostmarketingploy.blogspot...hotos-why.html
Quote:
Here is one result from an internet search. If you google :Madeleine McCann photographer , you will get lots more results. This early article below was raising the question: Is Paul Grover the same man as the one from the professional photos agency? I can assure you now that we were a lot of people to search on this, and the answer is: Yes!
So why is that? Why were all these 'dolled up' pics taken by this professional photographer? To which goal? And whoever good parent would want to have such a photo like this below taken?
Doesn't this seriously araise curiosity, if not severe suspicion, to the mind, when we know that all these pics were sold at top-wack price to the press - was this a whole pre-organised strategy 'just in case' this kid would go missing by any chance? Or is it pure coincidence?.... In any case , I think that NSY (The Met) should need to ask this child's parents about the need to pay a photographer, who usually SPECIALISES IN CELEBRITIES and other VIP's, (so imagine the BILL it must have reached... for people who needed to serve themselves out of their public fund to pay 2 months of mortgage, it's rather STRANGE, no?) - and possibly quizz this man too, Mr Paul Grover, and his agency. Collect statements and compare them - and I've just been told that the 'heavy blue eye-shadows' is also from the same photographer. Information to check upon, and I would welcome details about this, if true.
This is more conspiracy junk, all incorporated into the narrative to take us down pre-determined rabbit holes and away from the faked heart of matters. (although hints as to the photographic fakery are inserted in the narrative).
MM is a computer generated rendering.

and a comment left;
Quote:
Hi, I've searched, asked around and received this from a Friend: http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/200...ation-act.html
It's such an interesting, massive piece of information, I think I'll make a blog post out of it or share it anyway in the Home Page here.
I'm so greatful that you have posted this Comment, dear Anonymous, and then to my riend who has helped me out tonight towards it. TY to both of you! X
-it seems that you are really spot on, as there is a line in the 'table' (bit after the photo on Joana MORAIS's blog/web post, see link above) that stipulates as a 100% SURE, that the UK/GB MILITARY is involved in the McCann case!!!: " (CAAT v ICO & Ministry of Defence EA/2006/0040) " section 23 of the aforementioned table.

ICO (Information Commissioner Office) "v" (? I don't know what 'v' means in this context) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE !!!!! Now WHAT has the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Of a TERRITORIAL COUNTRY [GB] has to do with the Child Madeleine McCann case????
This is a military (industrial complex) psychological operation similar to 9/11. There are three stages to our learning...Fear (none of our children are safe), Anger(the big bad parents and government agencies) and Relief(Faked, All Faked!). There is no skipping stages (for most), on the road to awakening.

Last edited by upendedworld; 17-10-2013 at 02:55 PM.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 03:19 PM   #47
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkick View Post
Daily Mail
'Our friend Kate McCann, the perfect mum,' two of her closest friends speak out



A family photo of Kate McCann as a child. Kate is pictured (left) with her friend Nicky Gill outside a zoo.

KM hair looks a little odd, the center parting only goes halfway down her head?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...speak-out.html
Would you low and behold, Another photograph of MM with some
serious issues!

This is NOT the hand of a 3 year old (or younger)!



The nose is clearly pasted in.
The eyes are a terrible rendering
and the teeth and lower lip are of dreadful smudged quality.

They included a coloboma in her digital 'make-up' as a little joke
as you need a 'good eye' to sort out what's going on, and
'U' almost need to be 'A COLUMBO' to work it out!

Almost, but not quite, eh?

Last edited by upendedworld; 17-10-2013 at 05:57 PM.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 04:31 PM   #48
derekbuttery
Senior Member
 
derekbuttery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Masonic, Canada
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 1,794 (1,141 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upendedworld View Post
Would you low and behold, Another photograph of MM with some
serious issues!




The nose is clearly pasted in.
The eyes are a terrible rendering
and the teeth and lower lip are of dreadful smudged quality.

They included a coloboma in her digital 'make-up' as a little joke
as you need a 'good eye' to sort out what's going on, and
'U' almost need to be 'A COLUMBO' to work it out!

Almost, but not quite, eh?
Maybe, it's not a fictional detective but COLUMBIA ( shitty-pedia-link sorry! ) ? as for the eye, the all seeing eye? (columbia broadcasting service's logo too!)


just spit balling, and not saying MM never existed...
__________________
PEDOPHOBE AND PROUD
derekbuttery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 05:12 PM   #49
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekbuttery View Post
Maybe, it's not a fictional detective but COLUMBIA ( shitty-pedia-link sorry! ) ? as for the eye, the all seeing eye? (columbia broadcasting service's logo too!)


just spit balling, and not saying MM never existed...
I think these clues are always multi-layered, and what you post is certainly a possible, if not probable reference. (just be wide enough to separate the wheat from conspiracy chaff). The English language is coded in itself, and all those in the know have the keys.

Columbo (or angela Lansbury) would be very disappointed with most of us here (and elsewhere) - for falling hook line and sinker for deliberately doled out clues, and ending up exactly where they thought we would.

well, most of us anyway. Fresh eyes will see best.

This latest MM photo above is the icing on the cake for me.
Don't you think they could have done a much better job on all her photographs? of course they could!
But if you misconstrue the motivations behind this 'story', then you will misunderstand everything.
The motivations are ultimately (ultimately) benevolent.

And it won't be long now before we all know it.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 06:18 PM   #50
bashibozkedi
Senior Member
 
bashibozkedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 300
Likes: 6 (5 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkick View Post
Daily Mail
'Our friend Kate McCann, the perfect mum,' two of her closest friends speak out



A family photo of Kate McCann as a child. Kate is pictured (left) with her friend Nicky Gill outside a zoo.

KM hair looks a little odd, the center parting only goes halfway down her head?


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...speak-out.html
So maybe Kate is a computer graphic too,why stop there maybe Gerry and Clarence Mitchell don't exist either.,Neither does Gordon Brown or Richard Branson for that matter.

Let's keep it real folks.
__________________
OM TARE TUTTARE TURE MAMA SARVA RANDZA DUSHEN DRODA SHINDAM KURU SOHA.
Ancient Tibetan Mantra for protection against politicians (Seriously!)

"Some say there is existence. Some say there is nothing.
Rare is the man who believes in neither, he is beyond all illusion"
Ashtavakra Gita.
bashibozkedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 06:34 PM   #51
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bashibozkedi View Post
So maybe Kate is a computer graphic too,why stop there maybe Gerry and Clarence Mitchell don't exist either.,Neither does Gordon Brown or Richard Branson for that matter.

Let's keep it real folks.
I just used the MM photo from the link. any comment on that? I do believe kate to be a real person, acting out a role!
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 08:53 PM   #52
bashibozkedi
Senior Member
 
bashibozkedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 300
Likes: 6 (5 Posts)
Default

I have always thought that the child holding tennis balls looks completely different from all the other pictures of Madeleine. Looks like a different child.

Maybe it's just due to differences in clothing or facial expression.All the other pictures of Maddy are clearly of the same child. This one may perhaps not be.

Edited to add: Is that a bruise on her right wrist or maybe just a patch of dirt?
__________________
OM TARE TUTTARE TURE MAMA SARVA RANDZA DUSHEN DRODA SHINDAM KURU SOHA.
Ancient Tibetan Mantra for protection against politicians (Seriously!)

"Some say there is existence. Some say there is nothing.
Rare is the man who believes in neither, he is beyond all illusion"
Ashtavakra Gita.

Last edited by bashibozkedi; 17-10-2013 at 09:00 PM.
bashibozkedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 09:05 PM   #53
revlovejoy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 679
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upendedworld View Post
I just used the MM photo from the link. any comment on that? I do believe kate to be a real person, acting out a role!
I think your theory is as valid as those saying the Mccanns killed their own child. What i don't understand is the motivation to have hoax of this kind when whoever did the hoax, could have abducted and orchestrated the ensuing events, using a real child.

Why write a script when you can manipulate the script as events unfold?
revlovejoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 09:24 PM   #54
chaste
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 326
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revlovejoy View Post
I think your theory is as valid as those saying the Mccanns killed their own child. What i don't understand is the motivation to have hoax of this kind when whoever did the hoax, could have abducted and orchestrated the ensuing events, using a real child.

Why write a script when you can manipulate the script as events unfold?
Hi. Could you please quote anyone who has said that the McCanns killed their own child? Just to keep things clear.
chaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 09:47 PM   #55
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revlovejoy View Post
I think your theory is as valid as those saying the Mccanns killed their own child. What i don't understand is the motivation to have hoax of this kind when whoever did the hoax, could have abducted and orchestrated the ensuing events, using a real child.

Why write a script when you can manipulate the script as events unfold?
why didn't they kill 3,000 on 9/11, yet say they did?
same for Sandyhook?
same for Boston?
etc.
etc.
etc.

if you don't know that this is the case, there would be no point trying to explain further.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 10:24 PM   #56
orderoutofchaos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 51 (15 Posts)
Default

Are u people being serious.......mm never existed now? What planet are u living on. These are the sort of conspiracies that get quoted in the mainstream media and help to discredit real conspiracies. Can u not see it ?
orderoutofchaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 10:32 PM   #57
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orderoutofchaos View Post
Are u people being serious.......mm never existed now? What planet are u living on. These are the sort of conspiracies that get quoted in the mainstream media and help to discredit real conspiracies. Can u not see it ?
knee-jerk reaction based on preconceived notions and overdose on msm propaganda.

mind closed off to how news-reality has really worked.
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 11:13 PM   #58
orderoutofchaos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 51 (15 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upendedworld View Post
knee-jerk reaction based on preconceived notions and overdose on msm propaganda.

mind closed off to how news-reality has really worked.
There's having a open mind and questioning things, I'm all for that but this is complete lunacy in action .
orderoutofchaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 11:43 PM   #59
upendedworld
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derekbuttery View Post
Maybe, it's not a fictional detective but COLUMBIA ( shitty-pedia-link sorry! ) ? as for the eye, the all seeing eye? (columbia broadcasting service's logo too!)


just spit balling, and not saying MM never existed...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbi..._of_Journalism

The Columbia School of Journalism. Is this the production centre for many's a hoax? I have no doubt it is!
http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic...87791#p2387791
upendedworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2013, 11:51 PM   #60
retype
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 2 (2 Posts)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upendedworld View Post
Would you low and behold, Another photograph of MM with some
serious issues!

This is NOT the hand of a 3 year old (or younger)!



The nose is clearly pasted in.
The eyes are a terrible rendering
and the teeth and lower lip are of dreadful smudged quality.

They included a coloboma in her digital 'make-up' as a little joke
as you need a 'good eye' to sort out what's going on, and
'U' almost need to be 'A COLUMBO' to work it out!

Almost, but not quite, eh?
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here, I'm not saying it's not a very weird case, I'm saying after working in photoshop retouching for 20 years I don't see any things wrong about those pics
retype is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.