Go Back   David Icke's Official Forums > Main Forums > Exposing Child Abuse

Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2013, 06:43 AM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)
Default Powerful and Disturbing - Child Abuse in 2013



" would have like to have created a first thread about a gentle and peaceful topic but unfortunately I am fully engaged in one aspect of my life purpose.

I am a Teacher in Australia and made two Mandatory Reports in 2011 and have had my life destroyed. I put the Children first and obeyed the law and adhered to my professional training.

I am currently engaged in legal battles and it was suggested to me that I share my journey via the worldwideweb - so here I am. I know you have a membership of people who will no doubt send me positive thoughts and prayers and stand with me - as I fight what could only be described as evil.

Who knew that protecting Children from abuse (particularly sexual) would require me to have my life destroyed on every level and to have to fight to have the evidence properly and thoroughly investigated. However I know that all the awakened and aware will know my story as soon as they read and view.

I won't waffle on -please know that you can view my two short youtube videos. The first is to alert people to the fact I made it to Federal Court - on my own and unrepresented the second is an update. Recently the first draft of my book/recount was uploaded to the web - it has been cleaned of all identities but you can still realise the enormity of my battle. The book is most certainly a first draft as I have complete chapters to add - when they have been written.

I would welcome any feedback and thoughts. Thank you for taking the time to read and learn about my current (epic) journey/ordeal.

Much Peace - Amanda
ktlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 03:47 AM   #2
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

Hi there Amanda and welcome.

There is strong support here on this site and from me on a personal level for you. I'm so glad that so many good people are stepping up. Its time to get this out in the open for the light to clear.

Well Done.
susannah1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 08:57 AM   #3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

Please do come on here and share your story.
susannah1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-2013, 10:17 AM   #4
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)

Hello - I have joined the website and want to convey my thanks for the support. I am currently trying to get information to the Judge presiding over my case and am being blocked.

I understand that administrative procedures are in place and are strict but what I am experiencing is troubling. I will state this very clearly - during the Directions Hearing the Judge asked me about my efforts to engage pro bono legal representation and I could not physically hand him my typed notes at the time.

At the airport I realised I did have my notes and thought as soon as I get home I will send the information to him. I have been blocked twice. I have sent the information twice by registered mail. It is information and in no way evidence and the registrar tells me it is evidence. My efforts to gain pro bono legal representation are in no way evidence and I do not understand why the registrar would behave in this manner.

Anyone care to weigh in with a reason for my inability to get information to the Judge. I know that when fighting any battle for Child Protection there is going to be one brick wall after another to break through but this is getting to be ridiculous.

I would appreciate any thoughts or ideas particularly form anyone with legal or administrative knowledge. I will try once more to get the information to the Judge. Please know that the Judge and my response will be recorded in the Federal Court transcripts. By the Judge actually being properly informed of my efforts - he may - connect me to the Federal Court pro bono barrister system - he may not but I just feel compelled to keep trying.

I will commence my paperwork - on my own this week . Please know that I will represent myself should that be necessary. I would appreciate a pro bono legal representative but I shall continue on alone regardless. I always put the Children first when making these decisions and I always know that I will find the strength and clarity of mind I need.

The current Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses into Child Sexual Abuse have answered my latest correspondence - I will be a witness but it may take several months for me to be interviewed in person. So that's a step in the right direction.

I have other matters that are coming up and will share that information when I have more energy.

Thank you for your support. The number of people who have viewed my videos is now in the thousands and at least 52 people have viewed my identity free first draft book/recount. These are promising numbers and I can only hope they increase on a daily basis.

Much Peace - stay with me as I stay with the Children - Amanda Gabriel

amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-12-2013, 08:45 AM   #5
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)
Default Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

To all the people who support me and who are following my journey - thank you. On Thursday 19th December 2013 I will reach the first of the three legal arenas for which I have fought.

The first legal arena is my WorkCover Hearing which is a battle about what was done to me in my workplace (an Australian secondary school), immediately after I made a Mandatory Report.

A Mandatory Report is the legal obligation of a Teacher to report any information that is relevant to Child Abuse. My life was destroyed on every level.

Thank you for the positive thoughts and prayers and meditations and kind words. I have had my spirit broken but I am back and stronger than I imagined I could ever be - ready for whatever is to be thrown at me.

Thank you again - mush peace - Amanda
amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-12-2013, 11:39 PM   #6
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)
Default Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

For those of you who are following my journey and for those who've just joined in - I attended a WorkCover Hearing/Conciliation on Thursday 19th December 2013. I consider what transpired as a win. Here are the highlights.

1. The Arbitrator had to maintain strict legal boundaries (even though an inaccurate section was applied to my matter) and the most compensation I could expect was $13,000. Consider that my life was destroyed on every level immediately after I made a Mandatory Report in 2011 and three years of my life have been taken from me - three years that I will never get back. I stated this was an insult.

2. Barrister of 27 years of practice was visibly rattled when I mentioned my Federal Human Rights Court Interlocutory Hearing. All she was concerned with was, "What's the remedy?" which is legal meta-language for how much money to make this go away? I replied with, "I am setting a precedent so I can change laws. I asked her whether she wanted to read my Statement of Claim which is the basis for the Federal Human Rights Court matter and she replied in the affirmative. She was pulling the sheets out of the plastic covers frantically searching for something. I responded at one stage with this remark; "Some things in life are about ethics and conscience - not everything is about money." Remember readers my journey is about being a voice for Child Abuse victims and survivors.

3. I quoted a section of the Legal Profession Act 2004 to the female barrister - Section 730A Duty to report suspected offences - she responded like a bullet out of a gun with; "I am not applying that" or words similar. So I made some notes and while everyone was waiting for me to complete my notes I looked up and stated I would be relaying her denial of the law to the current Royal Commission. Keep in mind it is a criminal offence to fail to protect the identity of a Mandatory Reporter - comes with huge fines and/or a custodial sentence.

4. The entire session was recorded and at no time was I informed that the session was confidential thus I share information freely.

5. The outcome of the day - I have withdrawn my matter and can return to it at any time and re-commence proceedings - however - I elected to transfer my matter to the Fraud Investigation Branch for a full investigation. As I have commenced communications with the Legal Services Commissioner - I relayed the barristers denial of the Legal Profession Act 2004 Section 730A Duty to report suspected offences and requested it be added to my current complaint.

NB: AT one stage I offered, during an attempt at negotiating a one off lump sum compensation payment for the pain and suffering I have endured and for the three years of my life that have been taken from me that I will never get back - that I would not complete my book/recount for sharing with the public. I stated I would finish the book/recount for the purpose of sharing information with the current Royal Commission. No attempt was made to negotiate a one off lump sum compensation payment in private - which does happen and is perfectly legal. Hmmmm...stay tuned.

Thank you for the continued support from people everywhere - you keep me going. Much Peace - Amanda
amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2013, 12:16 AM   #7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 6 (4 Posts)

Sending you positive vibrations, Amanda, in your fight to continue to stand in front of the children. Deepest respect and a hug x
sweetcheeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2013, 06:28 AM   #8
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

Best wishes Amanda. Thanks for sharing your story.

You have our prayers and support. I hope your neighbors can join together to make a lot of noise.

You live in a big country with some big corruption in the system. But nothing's too big to fail.

Especially ignorance. Words fail me when I read this.

Old Hansard

Date: WEDNESDAY, 27 October 1999
Member: Carpenter, Mr Alan
Barnett, Mr Colin
Page: 2730 / 2


396. Mr CARPENTER to the Minister for Education

As the Acting Director General of Education confirmed on commercial radio this morning that self-confessed paedophile "Emu" Nugent has recently been working as a storyteller in Western Australian schools, I ask in which schools has he been working and for what time was he engaged in those schools?

Mr BARNETT replied:

I thank the member for some notice of this question. First, Mr Nugent is not now, and has never been, an employee of the Education Department of Western Australia, nor has he been convicted of any charges relating to paedophilic behaviour. He has, however, been charged in both Victoria and New South Wales, but acquitted. He is a member of the Storytelling Guild of Western Australia, and has visited schools in that capacity. I stress that whenever a visitor goes to a school, that person is required to make a declaration and at all times the students are in the charge of a teacher. This person is not alone with the students in the school. Given some of his public comments, which have become recognised widely, and given that we have recognised that some schools have been employing him to make school visits - those decisions have been made at the school level - the acting director general, with my support, has issued an instruction to schools today that this person is not to enter Western Australian government schools under any circumstances. We have also provided information to both the Catholic education system and the Association of Independent Schools. He is not a suitable person to be on school grounds, and he will not be.

Dr Gallop: Which schools?

Mr BARNETT: I do not have available a list of schools. That information is not maintained centrally. Those decisions are made by individual schools. However, the clear instruction is that this individual will not go into government schools. If he has in the past, which he clearly has, it has always been with the teacher being involved at all times when children are present.

Mr Carpenter: Can we get a list of schools?


Mr Carpenter: Why?

Mr BARNETT: For a start, I do not have them, and I do not think it is appropriate -

Dr Gallop: You do not want the people of those areas to learn about your failure in administration.

Mr BARNETT: I have a responsibility to ensure the care of the children and to protect their privacy and the privacy of their parents and their school - and I will not back off that.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-12-2013, 11:23 PM   #9
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)
Default Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

sweetcheeks & troyhand - A huge thank you for your support as I really am feeling the positive thoughts, prayers, meditations and general attention people are giving my journey.

The transcript of the government communication - what can I say other than it does not surprise me, as I have been battling my way through various administration systems since 2011.

Thank you for standing with me - I imagine a sea of people standing in front of Children in an effort to protect them - on a global scale - that would be an absolute success. What is that beautiful adage - if you don't dream it or imagine it how can you make it happen? Let's keep the visuals positive and work towards a safer world for all Children. I know that it is possible...

Much Peace - Amanda

NB: troy I will print your post and keep it on file for when I attend the current Australian Royal Commission - it is a great example of how not to conduct public business. Thanks & please everyone share any documents and/or information that is relevant to the journey.
amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-12-2013, 01:21 AM   #10
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 39
Likes: 1 (1 Post)

I too am from Australia.

There is a disturbing reliance on hearsay in cases of this nature. Indeed, in many cases I find no evidence whatsoever and merely the presumption that enough negative must add up to the truth.

There is another problem. That is the redefinition of the word "abuse". In some cases, willingly compliant individuals can be "abused" simply because they are categorised as underage. In other cases, "victims" appear to capitalise on their abuse. Therefore the intelligent observer must conclude they were not abused prior to the perceived advantages of being so.

I am particularly concerned of the clandestine "pariah" relationship with law enforcement and intelligence agencies, where one "manufactures" abuse for the other to scoop up convicts.

Checking this forum, I have found no actual evidence of child sex abuse, just lots of hearsay and prejudice. Though, child abuse clearly is a minor issue of past and current social order, it has been blown into a witch hunt far worse than any inquisition. Sadly, that mirrors your big government and justice (sic) strategy.

ozziethinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-12-2013, 01:36 AM   #11
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)
Default Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

ozziethinker - as my evidence is before the Federal Human Rights Court I am unable to discuss it publicly - please know this - I have collected and filed every document generated over 2011, 2012, 2013 and continuing - I have safety deposit and I have documents held in trust on most of the continents on the planet.

Should anything happen to me and I am unable to upload my documents and evidence - there is a global internet community who will ensure my journey is relayed to the public. I have one group of 100,000 IT computer professionals who are ready to act on my word - unbeknowst to me they have even designed a platform for my files.

With regard to heresay - as a former operational (worked the truck, made arrests, preferred charges and compiled my own briefs) Police officer I know the meaning of heresay - my files are not based on heresay. My aim at Federal Court is to set a precedent and I will change laws - at present I have the proof to show how predators in positions of authority are circumventing the current legislation and protecting paedophiles.

Stand with me - that is all you have to do to support me - I will do the rest.

Thank you for taking the time to share your observations.

Much Peace - Amanda
amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-12-2013, 08:43 PM   #12
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

@ozzie I think we can tell the difference between hearsay and witness testimony. When articles are posted here with testimony from witnesses or survivors, that's not hearsay, that's a record of witness testimony. If you're going to disregard the evidence, testimony, survivor stories, confessions, convictions, and total bullshit lies coming out of the establishment's mouth, then your statement of finding "no evidence whatsoever and merely the presumption that enough negative must add up to the truth" suggests you haven't read these threads with an open mind.

"I am particularly concerned of the clandestine "pariah" relationship with law enforcement and intelligence agencies, ... [You know about this "pariah" relationship? because I don't know what you mean by this] ... where one "manufactures" abuse for the other to scoop up convicts. [How do you manufacture child abuse without abusing children? The survivors' stories are made up? Is that what you're really saying?]

Do you have evidence that you read these threads? Because your blanket rejection of systemic organized child abuse without a logical counter-argument rings like the same old COINTELPRO tactic of misdirection and dissension.

If you're going to try to devalue Amanda's posts without even introducing yourself to her, then your belligerence to her thread seems very apparent. I don't think your link is worth clicking on. So I won't.

Aangirfan - Dec-23-2013
Land of Child Abusing Clergy, Politicians and Police

The United Protestant Association has been forced to apologise for the child sexual abuse at its Woodlands and Ellimatta homes over nearly 40 years.

(NEWSCASTLE, New South Whales) - In September 2013, it was reported that a pedophile ring, which included Christian clergy, sexually abused boys at the Woodlands Boys Home, in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

The home was run by the church.


According to one witness: "These men just came, got the boys, used them, and put them back."

According to another witness: "These men changed from week to week, suggesting a larger, organised ring.

"We are aware of a group of men who did come to the home in the 1970s for a number of years on a Sunday afternoon, ostensibly to conduct a children's Christian program, but who routinely took smaller boys into downstairs rooms in the building and abused them."

Anglican priest Peter Rushton, who was one of those who sexually abused the children

One witness reported: "If the boys reported what happened, they were flogged. My husband can still hear it, the screaming of the boys when they were taken downstairs and flogged for saying what had been done to them."

"Rushton went there all the time..."

The United Protestant Association has been forced to apologise for the child sexual abuse at its Woodlands and Ellimatta homes over nearly 40 years.


boys' home horror recalled.

The Salvation Army's BAYSWATER Boys' Home "was a paedophiles' paradise, with several unexplained deaths and missing boys, and others lent to outside paedophiles...

"Abuse by Salvation Army staff was so severe that in some cases boys were killed or allowed to die from their injuries...

"One victim, Rod Braybon, told police in 2009 of reports of two wards of state who died of beatings in the 1950s and were allegedly buried in the Sugarloaf Hill area of the home, while three other boys disappeared in mysterious circumstances...

''In the 1970s the Bayswater Boys' Home was staffed by a paedophile ring, and staff not only sexually abused the children in their care but also allowed other paedophiles free access to boys, who were removed from the home and sexually abused at will...

In 2006, the Salvation Army secretly paid more than $1.5 million in compensation to more than 50 victims who were beaten, raped and tortured from the 1950s to 1970s by Salvation Army officers at the Bayswater home, Box Hill Boys' Home and East Kew Girls' Home, all now closed."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/paedophile-ring-lent-out-boys-20121217-2bjej.html#ixzz2oHqcWDvR

Maltese children sent to 'child abuse' children's homes in Australia. (State Library of Western Australia, The Battye Library 005086D.)
(310 Maltese child migrants were sent to Australia?)

In Australia, as in North America and Europe, kids have been beaten and raped in children's homes.

The top people generally turn a blind eye.

In 1956, the UK government's John Ross led a fact-finding committee investigating Australian children's homes to which British children had been sent.

Ross found horrid conditions in the 26 institutions he visited and wanted some of them blacklisted.

The Australian Government asserted that the standards of care were OK.

It ignored the Ross Committee’s findings and continued to send vulnerable children to blacklisted institutions.

Rapes and beatings continued.

Box Hill Boys' Home

On 7 December 2010, we read about serious child abuse in Australian children's homes, run by the Salvation Army.

(Salvation Army abuse)

Brian Cherrie was repeatedly raped inside the Salvation Army's Box Hill Boys' Home.

"The children's home where I grew up is still owned by the Salvation Army ... and is worth tens of millions of dollars," he said.

"These churches and charities made a lot of money on the back of our misery and they need to cough up and pay redress to all forgotten Australians."

Alfred Stirling said of his time in Bayswater Boys' Homes: "I'd get the crap beaten out of me, and then raped ... it was hell."

The Salvation Army has now said sorry for the abuse of children in its care up to the 1990s.

David Campbell, former Police Minister.

In 2007 and 2008, David Campbell was Police Minister in New South Wales, in Australia. (David Campbell)

In May 2010 it was revealed that, while Transport Minister in New South Wales, the married David Campbell used a ministerial car to visit Ken's of Kensington, a gay sex club in Sydney.

(Australian MP resigns over sex scandal)

Ken's of Kensington has facilities for "sex on the premises, including private cubicles and specially-themed fantasy rooms."

There has been speculation that Campbell's personal life could have been used to blackmail him while he was Police Minister in 2007 and 2008.

In 2008 the former New South Wales Police Minister Matthew Brown was forced to resign after dancing semi-naked on a green leather sofa and simulating a sex act.

In 2008, the former New South Wales Aboriginal Affairs Minister Milton Orkopoulos was jailed for child sex.

In 1999, two journalists from Australia's Sun-Herald claimed to have seen evidence of the satanic ritual abuse of children.

They interviewed six mothers whose children had disclosed experiences of SRA and organised abuse in New South Wales.

The children's disclosures were corroborating, although they had never met one another, and they had been able to draw representations of "satanic" ritual sites which were similar to ritual sites uncovered by police on the central coast of New South Wales.

(List of satanic ritual abuse allegations.)

British children sent to Australia

In the late 1980s, a number of children at a daycare centre in the Mornington Peninsula, Victoria, Australia, began disclosing experiences of organised and ritualistic sexual abuse to their parents and the police.

Their disclosures included instances in which they were taken in a car from the creche to a nearby house, undressed by adults and sexually assaulted, video-taped and filmed while naked, and urinated and defecated upon by adults.

The children disclosed that some of the abusers wore police uniforms....

List of satanic ritual abuse allegations

In 2002, Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon referred complaints about the mishandling of the case by police to the Victorian Ombudsman.

An officer from the Ethical Standards Department was stood down a year later from the Ombudsman's investigation for "incompetence" after failing to pass on information from two key witnesses, and claiming that he never spoke to them when phone records proved that he had.

One of the witnesses referred to a tape of child pornography showing men in police uniforms sexually assaulting children from the daycare centre.

However, this lead was never followed up by the police.

British children sent to Australia

Another witness identified the house in which the children had been assaulted as being owned by a police officer.

The principal of a private college on the Mornington Peninsula repeatedly told the Department of Human Services that a 12-year-old boy disclosed ongoing sexual abuse by an organised group of men wearing police uniforms.

According to the principal, all records of the child's complaint vanished.

A Victoria Police spokesman said he was not aware that files had disappeared. The police declined to press charges, saying the boy had been "too well groomed" by the pedophiles and probably would not testify in court.

Sexual abuse was common at Bindoon Boys Town, in Australia.

The boys called their Catholic guardians the 'Christian Buggers'.

In 2001, an inquiry into Bindoon, by the Australian Senate (The sad truth behind Britain's lost children), was told about:

1. Rape.

2. Children scrambling for breadcrumbs on the floor.

3. A boy being forced to shoot and skin a horse he considered to be his only friend.

In the two decades after World War II, the UK government took around 10,000 children from UK Children's Homes and sent them to Australia.

Many of these children were to become a form of slave labour.

Bindoon Boys Town

Some of the children ended up at Bindoon Boys Town.

At Bindoon there were regular floggings and there was regular child sexual abuse.

Former Bindoon boy John Hennessy speaks with a stutter.

He recalls being stripped naked and publicly flogged at Bindoon.

Mick Snell, who was sent to the Methodists Dalmar House in Sydney, says: "A lot are starting to top themselves... I dream I'm back there and I'm locked up, being verbally abused and whacked. I wake up in a cold sweat."

(The sad truth behind Britain's lost children) Snell had to get up before 4am to milk the cows and had to work until dark.

"You had no one to turn to," says Snell.

Outsiders would take some boys out for the day.

"I know for a fact they were rock spiders (paedophiles). The kids that were involved, they didn't like talking about it," says Snell.

At Bindoon there was no teaching and several former inmates are illiterate.


Last edited by troyhand; 25-12-2013 at 09:12 PM.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2013, 12:25 AM   #13
amanda gabriel
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 198
Likes: 73 (32 Posts)
Default Powerful & Disturbing Child Abuse in 2013

Thank you to all the people who are keeping this thread alive by virtue of your views and responses. I want to share an article on the topic of Child Abuse that filled my heart with hope.

Perhaps it has already been posted - perhaps not - I will share it regardless. It is a short youtube clip that evinces the mighty effort a group of dedicated people have put into their battle to protect Children from abuse.


Please keep this thread alive with your views and responses - it is a mighty battle to defend Children from paedophiles and predators - every person and every effort that is contributed to this worthy battle will benefit a Child somewhere.

Much Peace - Amanda
amanda gabriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2013, 05:08 AM   #14
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

The Canberra Times - Thursday 12 December 1985
How a child-welfare report sank Sir Joh

THE QUEENSLAND Government's attempts to head off criticism of its handling of the State's economy were sunk by a little read report by the Director of the Children's Services Department, Mr G. J. Zerk.

In a year when the two big electoral losers for the Bjelke-Peterson Government were the State. Budget and child-pornography/deviant sex issues, Mr Zerk delivered a carefully worded but explosive annual report.
Queensland has the highest rate of illegimate births and the highest rate of violence to children of the States, yet the lowest spending on child welfare.

A report by Queensland's Director of Public Prosecutions, Mr Des Sturgess says that Queensland has a serious child-pornography problem and is the centre of Australia's small but growing paedophile population.

The Canberra Times - Saturday 10 December 1983
IN BRIEF 'No abuse of children'

MELBOURNE: A World Vision inquiry had found Filipino children
in its sponsorship program had not been sexually abused by sponsors
the organisation's director of donor services, Mr Bert O'Brien, said yesterday.

He said he had interviewed in the Philippines this week parents and the children
sponsored by two people under investigation for child pornography and sexual abuse.

He said police had said the two sponsors, who had since withdrawn their sponsorship,
had been members of the Paedophile Support Group.

The Canberra Times - Saturday 1 December 1984
Senators told of crackdown on child-exploiters

US fights pornography

WASHINGTON, Friday (Reuter). — The US had embarked on a sweeping
crackdown on increased traffic in imported child pornography from Europe,
Customs Commissioner William von Raab told yesterday the Senate Subcommittee
on Investigations, which is exploring US criminal activity.

The subcommittee also heard an allegation that members of an Australian
child-prostitution ring in Melbourne had posed as foster parents to obtain
young Filipino boys.

Earlier, an international organisation dedicated to protecting children testified
that as many as 170 million "street children" around the world were at risk
of being drawn into child prostitution, trafficking and pornography.

Mr Von Raab said his office had investigated mail deliveries from Holland,
Denmark and Sweden which accounted for about 85 per cent of all child
pornography imported into the US.

Customs agents, using ad dresses on imported pornography, had arrested
numerous child pornographers, recipients of child pornography, so-called
paedophiles who desired sex with pre-pubcscent children, and child molesters.

Several child-pornography recipients engaged in occupations which placed them
in close contact with children were being investigated by Customs officers.

New legislation had improved the ability of investigators to correctly classify models
in photo graphs as children, since the definition of a minor now included those up
to 18 years old, instead of up to 16 as before.

The US Supreme Court had allowed Customs officials wide powers to search
mail from overseas.

"We are stopping the illegal importation of obscene books, magazines, films,
videotapes, and other materials on a daily basis," he said. "More importantly,
we are putting criminals behind bars."

Mr Kenneth Herrmann, a member of the board of the American branch of
Defence for Children International, testified that among the examples of
child exploitation his organisation had investigated in the past two years was
a sex syndicate in Melbourne "deeply involved in a systematic program of child
pornography with young Filipino boys, [which] had actually taken some of the
boys to Australia for illicit sexual purposes under the banner of foreign
foster-parent support groups."

It was known as the Paedophile Support Group.

The Canberra Times - Wednesday 4 September 1985
Paedophile's death halts Crown appeal

MELBOURNE: A Crown appeal against the leniency of a sentence given
to a man who claimed to have had sex with 2,000 boys was withdrawn
yesterday after the Supreme Court was told-the man had taken his own life

Mr Peter McDermott said his client, Mr William Alexander Allen, fell from
the sixth, seventh or eighth floor of Gordon House, a hostel for men in
suburban South Melbourne on Monday night.

On Monday the court heard that Mr Allen, 64, of Kew, was a "dedicated
paedophile" who had shown no evidence that he was genuine about trying
to stop his deviant behaviour.

Mr Allen, a former music teacher, had said in an unpublished book,
"I fully accepted I was a boy-lover and would die a boy-lover. To me,
boys are as necessary as sleep."

Mr Allen was put on a $1,000 five-year good-behaviour bond in June after
he pleaded guilty to eight counts of sexual penetration of an 11-year-old
boy and two counts of procuring a minor for sexual penetration.

The Crown appealed against the leniency of the sentence, saying it
would not deter Mr Allen and others from similar offences.

Mr Justice Kaye said yesterday there was no purpose in pursuing the appeal.

He said Mr Allen was a responsible, gifted, articulate and intelligent man who
had had the potential to do tremendous good in life.

"Regrettably, however, the material before this court shows there were those
facets of his life which were criminal, corrupting and did nothing to enhance
the welfare of mankind," he said. "Indeed they were retro grade steps which
we would hope others who were minded to follow would abandon."

A note and documents left by Mr Allen in his Gordon House room were
produced in court.

The judge said they were "obviously very private" and should be given to
those to whom they were addressed..

Before being sentenced in June, Mr Allen asked to be chemically castrated
by being put on the libido-depressant drug Depro-Provera for life.

On Monday, Mr Richard Read, for the Crown, told the court Mr Allen apparently
had not taken the drug between when it was recommended and the trial.

He said there was no
evidence to support Mr Allen's unsworn claim to the court that he had reformed.

Mr Read said Mr Allen had promoted sex-with boys in Australian and
overseas articles and was at the first meeting of the Paedophile Support Group
at Clifton Hill in August, 1983

Last edited by troyhand; 29-12-2013 at 05:54 AM.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 09:18 AM   #15
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

Herald Sun - January 01, 2014
Pedophile priest Michael Charles Glennon dies in jail

Michael Glennon, a former Catholic priest and convicted child sex attacker

NOTORIOUS paedophile Catholic priest Michael Charles Glennon has died in jail.

Glennon, who was convicted of sex charges against children as young as seven, died today in the Hopkins Correctional Centre in Ararat.

By 2003 he had been convicted of abusing 15 children, but police believe there were many more victims.

He first went to jail in 1978, for molesting a 10-year-old girl in his car.

It was the only time he admitted guilt, forcing his many victims to endure long and traumatic criminal trials.

Glennon was still a priest after his release from jail for that crime, practising in a freelance capacity mainly to immigrant and Aboriginal communities.

Further charges were laid during the 1980s over "sleepovers" Glennon held with children at camps, and more followed throughout the next two decades.

Most of his victims were children in his care at the Karaglen camp near Lancefield.

Some of the victims were attacked while Glennon was on bail over other sex attacks.

But parents continued to trust the fiendish predator, who played guitar and charmed parishioners.

In one of his trials a woman gave evidence that she saw Glennon in a bed with a boy one night, but thought nothing of it because she trusted him.

``Well, of course I did. I'm a Catholic, aren't I?'' she told the jury. ``I mean, you go by the cloth. Who else do you trust in this world?''

Glennon didn't qualify for parole after being jailed for some of his crimes in 1991, because he refused to take part in a sex offenders program.

Broadcaster Derryn Hinch was jailed for contempt of court after exposing Glennon in a radio campaign.

Glennon died of natural causes, aged 69.


May, 1971: Michael Charles Glennon is ordained a Roman Catholic priest but resigns in '84

Nov., 1985: Police charge him with sexually interfering with children. Derryn Hinch starts broadcasting warnings about him on 3AW and is later found guilty of contempt of court

Oct., 1987: Hinch spends 12 days in Morwell Prison and is fined $15,000

June, 1991: County Court jury convicts Glennon of five charges and acquits him of another 12 relating to sexual assaults on three girls and a boy under 14. He is jailed with a seven-year minimum term

Dec., 1991: Glennon is freed when the Court of Appeal finds that publicity had made a fair trial impossible

May, 1992: Back behind bars after the High Court reinstates the convictions and sentence

March, 1994: Glennon wins a High Court appeal against a conviction for indecent assault that reduces his nine-year, one-month jail term by a month

April, 1999: 65 charges of sex offences against 15 complainants broken into three trials

May, 1999: Back in custody after a jury convicts him in the "first trial" of 24 counts relating to six boys between May 1974 and May 1978

Sept, 1999: Pleads not guilty in the "second trial" to 10 counts of sexual misconduct against five victims from January 1982 to December 1984. Trial aborted but a fresh jury convicts him of all but one count

Nov., 1999: Jury starts to hear evidence in a "third trial" but is discharged. Glennon jailed for a total of 14½ years with a 12½ year minimum for both trials

March, 2001: Court of Appeal dismisses his appeal in the "first trial" and his 8.5-year jail term remains. But the court upholds his appeal against conviction and sentence in the "second trial" after finding the judge failed to properly direct the jury

July, 2003: The "second trial" starts again with only one complainant. Glennon is found guilty of all three counts

Oct., 2003: In the "third trial", a County Court jury finds Glennon guilty of 23 charges of abuse on three boys from 1986 to 1991

Nov., 2005: Court of Appeal reduces his 15-year term by 5 years and orders a retrial on some charges.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2014, 08:13 AM   #16
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

Queensland Times - 2nd Jan 2014
Principal retains teaching job after pedophile inaction

TOOWOOMBA Catholic primary school principal who rehired a pedophile teacher in 2008 will be allowed to continue teaching unless further evidence arises of misconduct.

Former teacher Gerard Vincent Byrnes pleaded guilty in 2010 to committing 44 sexual offences against 13 girls while teaching Year 4 students at a Toowoomba school in 2007 and 2008.

The charges included 33 counts of indecent treatment of a child under 16 and 10 counts of rape.

Byrnes was sentenced to 10 years' prison.

The Queensland Civil and Administration Tribunal case against his principal at the time, who cannot be named to protect the identity of the children, has found he failed to take appropriate steps to protect children after allegations of abuse were made.

Fourteen of the 44 sexual offences committed by Byrnes took place after the principal was notified by a parent of his conduct.

The Tribunal also found the principal had rehired the pedophile, then 58, in a casual teaching role after Byrnes retired in July 2008.

Last edited by troyhand; 02-01-2014 at 08:13 AM.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2014, 01:13 AM   #17
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

The battle and harassment of Dr. Reina Michaelson


(The lady at the centre of this story is Dr Reina Michaelson)

GRAHAM KENNEDY, "The King of Comedy" / "The King of Television",
is the person referred to therein by the pseudonym "Gerald Oanasis".

("Sarah Connor" is NOT Nova Peris-Kneebone)

The following is a summary of events that detail the infiltration of a high-profile, powerful group of child sex offenders into my child abuse prevention organisation. What was uncovered as a result of this infiltration was the existence of an Illuminati-based child pornography and pedophile ring that is operating in Australia, under the protection of senior-ranking members of Victoria Police. The members of the network include senior management and executives from a major television network, media celebrities, high-ranking politicians, police officers in charge of pedophile and child pornography investigations, senior management representatives from the Department of Education, directors of "child-focused" service clubs, wealthy businessmen, and others. I have tried to keep the account as brief as possible while trying to include all relevant information. The description covers events from 1995 until present. Names have been changed.

Department of Education Protects Pedophile Teacher

In 1995 I started running Australia's first child sexual abuse prevention program in schools. This school-based program teaches children how to protect themselves from sexual abuse and what to do if someone tries to sexually abuse them. The program also teaches adults how they can best protect children under their care from sexual abuse. My assistant and I were at a particular high school in the northern region working with Year 9 boys. We received a note written anonymously by one of the boys asking "What do you do if you get raped by a teacher and no-one will believe you? What happens if you get raped and you enjoy it?". Later during that day we were asked exactly the same question by a boy who was flushed red with embarrassment. I replied "Talk to the Student Welfare Coordinator", to which he replied "What if he is the one who won't believe you?" I emphasizied that it is important to keep telling until someone believes you.

During the day my assistant and I noticed the strange behaviour of a particular teacher, called Dick Newman. Later that afternoon I learnt that the car I had been driving had been rammed in the school's car-park. Witnesses reported that the car had been rammed deliberately by a man who then drove off very quickly.

The local police were called and ran a licence check on the car and discovered that the number-plate was fake. They then took photos of the crime scene using the school's camera. Later, when it was revealed that a teacher was under suspicion of sexually abusing the children at the school and then organising the ramming of my car to intimidate me, the photos went "missing", and no further action was taken.

Dick Newman was the only person at the school who knew my car, as he had taken it upon himself to show me to my car to give me directions to the shops during a break in classes.

It was organised that the boys in Year 9 would be interviewed in order to find the victims and give them appropriate support. Three people (including myself, my assistant and a counsellor from a sexual assault centre) were responsible for conducting the interviews. At the completion of the interviews, there were concerns for approximately 12 of the boys. These concerns related specifically to sexual assault by a teacher at the school. However, by this stage (over a week had passed since the initial program) it was clear that the boys had been threatened. For example, when I interviewed the boy who had asked the questions about sexual abuse by a teacher and not being believed, he huddled into a foetal position, started crying, and said he could not tell me what happened. When I asked him why he couldn't tell me, he replied that he had been threatened with his life. His best friend told me he would never tell what had happened.

Some time after this, we organised a theatre company performance for the students (on the topic of sexual abuse). While the children were seated and waiting for the play to begin, Dick Newman made an unscheduled visit to the hall. He proceeded to stand in front of each of the boys we had identified as potential victims and stare them down. The boys, who had been happy and laughing in the excitement of waiting for the play to begin, went grey with fear. Finally, I stood in front of Dick Newman so that he could not intimidate the boys any further.

I was then told no further action would be taken as the boys had not named the offender.

Program Infiltrated by Pedophile Board of Management

I was the recipient of a very prestigious national award for Community Service. One of the judges was a well-connected government official (Ron Snide), and another was the General Manager (Bob Sisterly) of one of the major Australian television networks (Network X).

After winning this award, Bob Sisterly approached me and said that he had never heard of this terrible crime (child sexual abuse) before meeting me. He said wanted to help me get my program into every school in Victoria within five years and said he had the money and the connections to do this. He said he would raise half a million dollars in six-weeks and have it matched within 6-months. He said that he and Ron Snide would set my program up as an independent organisation and that they would establish a Board of Management consisting of all of their powerful and influential friends. Ron Snide would become President of the organisation and Bob Sisterly, Vice-President.

I agreed to Bob Sisterly's proposal as it sounded as if he would enable the program to receive substantial funding and therefore be able to reach many more children within Victoria, and across Australia. I did not consider for a second that Bob Sisterly and Ron Snide could have been deceiving me in order to get control of, and ultimately, to destroy the child sexual abuse prevention program that I had developed.

The Board members and supporters that they brought to the organisation were very powerful and from the highest echelons of society. These included the Editor-in Chief of a major Australian newspaper, the former head of a child-focussed service club, the head of the largest agricultural society in Victoria, the partner from a well-known law firm, an extremely wealthy businessman and former Network X board member, the head of a well-known accounting firm, the head of a successful advertising company, and others.

Despite having such wealth and powerful connections, in the two-year period that they served on the Board they organised only one donation of $25,000. The board members subsequently despised the donor and ostracised him from their community (which at the time I thought was incredibly ungrateful!). This is compared with over $200,000 my family and I raised doing the fundraising ourselves in the same time period!

Furthermore, my efforts to secure funding were being actively sabotaged. For example, after an interview on the Channel 9 'Today' show (not Network X), I was contacted by a well-known multi-national company who said that they would like to fund my program. This well-known company was located in Sydney, and as Bob Sisterly frequently went to Sydney, I asked if he would have a meeting with them on behalf of our organisation. He agreed. However, when he returned from the meeting, he said for me not to have much hope and not to contact them for six months while they sorted out a new tax issue. I found this very odd, as they had been so keen to fund the organisation when I had spoken to them. I phoned the woman whom I had spoken to, and she confirmed my suspicions. She had been at the meeting and Bob Sisterly had told the company not to bother funding us, as "the organisation won't be around in six months". Needless to say, we did not receive the funding.

During this time period, I was without any income for four months. Many other people would have quit and sought other employment, however, I believed passionately in my cause and did not give up, much to the chagrin of Bob Sisterly. On one occasion he said to me "You have given so much to this cause in your life, why don't you just give up? You have achieved more good in your short life than many do in a long life-time. Why don't you retire down in the country (I was 28 years old). Go on, just give up". When I replied that I would never give up, he stormed away! I was confused by this behaviour, but as I trusted him I did not think too much more about it at the time.

The Board members achieved one other "in-kind" donation. It was the use of a Honda CRV vehicle. I appreciated the use of the vehicle while I had it (approximately 18 months). However, I later discovered that the head of the company that donated it, a close friend of Ron Snide, had just been convicted of child sex offences. These offences included the production of child pornography.

Ron Snide organised a meeting with Tom Fatsky, the CEO of a major charitable trust and personal friend of his and to other members of the Board. At that meeting I was amazed when Tom asked me "Do you ever think that by preventing children from having sexual relationships with adults that you are actually HARMING them?" I replied by citing the research that strongly indicates adult-child sexual relationships are harmful to children, but he had switched his mind off to my argument. He then stated that in 100 years or so it will be revealed that such relationships are not harmful but that what I was doing was harmful to children. I was certainly taken aback and Ron said "Don't worry, Tom just thinks on a very high intellectual plane. High above yours". Needless to say, we didn't get funding from Ron Snide's very good friend afterall.

Meeting with VERY POWERFUL Pedophile Politician

After winning the award, I had a meeting with a very powerful state politician, Greg Neckett. At that time, Greg Neckett was the most powerful person in the state. As well as being politically powerful he also had key business interests, including in the media. When I was first introduced to him, he was staring at me quite sleazily. After he asked what work I do, and my response "child abuse prevention", he would not make eye contact at all and sought to exclude me from the meeting in a very bullying manner. It was well-known that Greg Neckett was a serious domestic violence offender, and that his wife was frequently being admitted to shelters in secret. However, given the power and status of Mr. Neckett, the issue was never raised in the mainstream media.

I was later to be informed by a very reliable and trusted source from the child welfare field that there is a file containing serious child sex offences (against boys) by Greg Neckett, but because of his enormous power in Victoria, the police would not act on it. I also discovered from a former sex worker that Greg Neckett frequently paid St. Kilda boy sex workers for sex, and that one of these boys "talked too much to the wrong people and ended up dead with an 'accidental' heroin overdose". It was also alleged that Greg Neckett intentionally abused the boys in unusual situations (for example, in a helicopter) so that if it ever got out, the boys' testimonies would seem unbelievable. This of-course, is exactly the same strategy used by offenders in the U.S child-care centre cases. Interestingly, Greg Neckett has recently commissioned a statue of himself - as a gargoyle.

Later I met with another politician (from the same political party) who told me that "Greg Neckett is REALLY into that (child sex abuse)". This same politician told me that in the late 1980's and early 1990's, the police were "getting too close to the truth, too close to people in high positions of power who are also pedophiles" and so the unit that had been established to investigate organised pedophilia was shut down. (Soon after a pedophile police officer was put in charge of investigating these offences to ensure that the truth never got out and that this high-ranking network of offenders would never get caught).

Network X Produces Pornography

One day I was working on a computer at Network X. As I was working, Bob Sisterly approached my computer and put a floppy disk in the machine. He said "Look at this" and proceeded to bring up images of pornography involving humans and Sesame Street characters. I was very embarrassed and did not know how to react. I asked "Where did you get that?" and he replied "Oh, someone put it together here", indicating that Network X was producing pornography. I was later to discover that Network X is also producing child pornography and is, in fact, an Illuminati-owned and run television station. I was also later to discover that Bob Sisterly is a passionate member of the Illuminati "religion".

Bob Sisterly introduces me to Mr. Television.

After winning the abovementioned award, I was invited to go on one of the morning television shows on Network X. (This was before my association with Bob Sisterly. Ironically, after my association with Bob Sisterly, Network X did not do any promotion of my work at all!) It is hosted by one of the most famous and longest serving television personalities in Australia, Ernie Old. I was asked to prepare a number of questions that Ernie would ask me. I prepared very straight-forward questions that focussed on the work, so I was quite shocked when he glared at me and said "Are you doing this because it happened to YOU?". I was also stunned when he refused to allow the phone number of my organisation to be presented on the air for donations.

When I later became closely associated with Network X Bob Sisterly would often say to me "You know, Ernie Old REALLY likes you. He REALLY likes you!" This surprised me because my experience of Ernie Old had been the exact opposite of that. (Interestingly, Bob Sisterly also frequently said to me "Greg Neckett (the very powerful politician) really likes me since I started helping you. He has me sit next to him at all of the formal functions we attend now". This was indeed true, Greg Neckett, Bob Sisterly and Ron Snide were all the best of friends.)

After my experience with Network X, I subsequently discovered that in the late 1980's Ernie Old was frozen out of the television industry due to allegations of his involvement in the production of child pornography. Although his alleged involvement in this activity was well-publicisized at the time, he was never charged and about a year later he joined Network X. Since then he has continued to play a significant role in the production of child pornography in Australia. One contact who works on the set of the morning program hosted by Ernie Old finds the work to be very distressing as other on-air talent are very open about their pedophilia. This contact is disgusted, as his sister is a victim of child sex offences, however he does not want to publicly disclose the information as he will lose his job.

In addition to the above, I am now in contact with a boy who was paid $2000 a night to have sex with Ernie Old, from the ages of 15 - 18 years.

Introduction to the Pedophile Police

There is a specialised police unit in Victoria that, since the early 1990's, is responsible for investigating all child sex offences involving multiple-victims, offences committed by teachers, as well as child pornography offences. I had a meeting with the head of this unit, Detective Senior Sergeant Nick Flanagan, and was very surprised when the first thing he said to me was "Does Greg Neckett know about your program? Greg Neckett should know about your program". I found this a very odd thing for him to say as an opening statement, and especially so, given the information known about Greg Neckett's alleged sexual abuse of boys. I thought it impossible for this police officer not to know of these things, given his specialist role.

Relationship between Nick Flanagan and Bob Sisterly

I subsequently became aware of the "unusual" relationship between Nick Flanagan (police) and Bob Sisterly (Network X). I invited Nick Flanagan to do a presentation for the board members. Ron Snide was "so impressed" by Nick Flanagan that he wanted to invite him onto the Board of Management (along with all the other pedophile members). I later discovered that Nick Flanagan and Bob Sisterly, although pretending not to know each other at the Board meeting, have a very cosy relationship indeed.

Specifically, a couple of years ago, a senior staff member at Network X was charged with procuring children for prostitution. At the time, the wife of a detective working in Nick Flanagan's unit (Jan Pummell) received a very sudden and significant promotion to become Bob Sisterly's Personal Assistant. It was a clear conflict of interest and deeply comprising to the investigation. Jan Pummell's husband should not have been involved in investigating Network X staff for their involvement in procuring children for prostitution or any other child sex offences connected to Network X. However, with the appointment of the detective's wife to Personal Assistant of the General Manager of Network X, it was guaranteed that no other information pertaining to Network X's illegal activities involving sex offences against children would be pursued by Nick Flanagan or his unit. And Jan Pummell enjoyed her unexpected and incredibly well-paid, new position at Network X.

Pedophile Police Called in to Investigate Pedophile Teacher and Other Offences

In 1999 fresh allegations were made against Pedophile Teacher, Dick Newman. This time, teenage girls reported that Dick Newman approaches students and asks them to meet him after school to meet 'Winston the Baseball Bat'. They indicated that 'Winston' was Dick Newman's penis. They reported that other students were very affected by this behaviour, and some had taken to writing warnings to each-other on the desks, such as "If Newman asks you to meet Winston, don't do it - its his dick!!".

At last, Newman had been named and the victims were prepared to come forward. Newman admitted to these offences and received 5 sessions of counselling. I then discovered that Newman had conveniently taken up a temporary position in a country school (like a priest being moved from parish to parish when things get too hot). The principal at the original school had not told the new school the circumstances surrounding his transfer and had instead said "Poor Dick, he's had a difficult time lately". I later discovered that this Principal was an expert liar and had gone over and above the call of duty in protecting this pedophile teacher.

At this new country school it was not long before further allegations of child abuse by Newman came out. Incidents of verbal abuse, such as calling students "f--king stupid" were revealed, as well as physical assaults, such as dragging students out of the classroom and throwing them on the floor. In another physical assault, Newman grabbed the 12-year-old boy by the neck and held him by his neck against a wall. Newman admitted to the latter assault, wrote a letter of apology and provided financial compensation for the loss of the necklace.

With Newman being named and various offences being admitted to, I reported his behaviour for criminal investigation to Nick Flanagan's unit. It also provided the opportunity for the 1995 offences to be re-investigated. However, Nick Flanagan interviewed only 2 of the 12 boys on the list from 1995, and reported to me that as the first two boys did not disclose anything, the others would not be interviewed. In relation to the offences against the teenage girls, Flanagan said that, at 15 years of age, the girls were "too young", and he did not want to distress the girls' families by bringing up the topic of child sexual abuse. Therefore, these offences by Newman would not be investigated either. I could not believe what I was hearing! Child sex offences are offences because they happen against children! And at 15, the victims were hardly at the young end of the age-spectrum! It was a completely nonsensical reason for not investigating Dick Newman.

As for the physical assaults, Flanagan said that he was not responsible for such investigations, so those cases would not be pursued either.. (Interestingly, Bob Sisterly also frequently said to me "Greg Neckett (very powerful politician) really likes me since I started helping you. He has me sit next to him at all of the formal functions we attend now".) He said "You do understand, don't you!" (it was not a question) and I replied that I did not. However, Nick Flanagan was not prepared to discuss the situation amicably and Dick Newman evaded investigation, by both the police in the unit established to investigate such offences, and by the Department of Education.

Further Dealings with the Pedophile Police

Whilst at the country school (Goldtown) disclosures of child sexual abuse by other offenders were made by many children. The disclosures centred on two offenders in the town. The specialised unit arrived to "investigate". However, the main victim of the sexual abuse, Sammy, a 12-year-old girl, did not attend school that day. She arrived after school on her bike and her face was visibly disfigured. I was told by her best friend that she had been bashed but her friend would not tell me who did this to Sammy. Her smashed-in face was warning enough for all of the children. The police later went to her house, where she fainted upon seeing them. She did not disclose any abuse at all. Despite the fact that her face was visibly disfigured and swollen from a recent assault, the police did not pursue the matter further.

The specialised police unit totally destroyed any chance of the truth being revealed and the victims receiving the justice they deserved. For example, they left children waiting all day to be interviewed and did not end up interviewing them, including witnesses to attempted child-rapes. They interviewed one 12-year-old victim (Lucy) and totally intimidated her. When the girl indicated that the police didn't believe her the first time she told them what had happened to her, one officer lent right over the top of her, pointed his finger directly in her face and hissed "Don't say that! You don't know that!". I was shaking, and I was an adult sitting next to the girl! As she walked out of the interview room, the officer said in voice loud enough for the girl to hear "We have serious concerns about the truth of what this girl is saying". It had the desired effect, Lucy burst into tears and said "The police don't believe me. I don't want to keep going". The Welfare Co-ordinator, who was also in the room during the interview, and who is also an experienced sexual assault counsellor and child protection officer, said to me "That wasn't an interview. That was designed to stop a child from talking".

The police did not pursue the case any further on the following grounds: No-one would believe Sammy if she disclosed the abuse in the future, as she hadn't disclosed the first time. (The fact that she had been bashed would not be seen as relevant to her hesitancy to disclose?!) Lucy had led all the children on (to make up "stories" of sexual abuse for fun, even though the children were visibly traumatised). In relation to the sexual abuse of a boy, "men try to touch other men's penises after football matches all the time" (!) so it was not worthy of pursuing. And finally, that there was not enough evidence - this is despite the fact that there were WITNESSES to the attempted rapes of the children, and the testimonies of many victims provided significant corroboration. Also, many adults reported having been sexually abused by the same offenders when they were children, but the police refused to interview these adults.

The Case is Stonewalled by the Pedophile Police

The police recommended that the Welfare Co-ordinator make reports to the Child Protection department as they stated it was a "protective issue, not a criminal one". The Welfare Co-ordinator did this, but weeks passed and the children were not interviewed, and she inquired as to why. She was informed that the Child Protection Department would not be taking any further action "on the advice of the police". So, after telling the Welfare Co-ordinator to take the case to Child Protection for investigation, the Police effectively stone-walled the investigation by advising Child Protection NOT to investigate.

Relationship between Bob Sisterly and Nick Flanagan

During the two-year association I had with Bob Sisterly, Don Snide and the Board of Management that they had established, I trusted them implicitly. Although incidents occurred that often left me confused, and often baffled, and of-course, frequently without funding, I continued to trust them. Bob Snide always said to me "I'm here to help". It was his favourite saying. I therefore reported all of the events that had occurred at the northern secondary school and the Goldtown school, to Bob Sisterly. Bob Sisterly then told me that he knows Detective Senior Sergeant Nick Flanagan (in contrast to his earlier pretence of not knowing him at all!). He stated that Nick Flanagan is a "really good bloke". However, when I spelt out the stonewalling of the Goldtown case, Bob Sisterly's face twitched and he became visibly uncomfortable. I had never seen Bob Sisterly react in this way.

It was soon after this that very strange events began to occur.

On one occasion Bob Sisterly was on the phone to his "boss" (of Network X). When his boss realized that I was present he began to speak aggressively, not knowing that I could hear him. He was saying "put her on the phone to me, I'll sort her out!". Of course, I found this all to be very strange as I had never even met this man before. However, when Bob Sisterly apologised on behalf of his boss, I accepted it and put it out of my mind - again, because at that time I trusted him.

I had recently purchased a very cheap country property that I planned to use as a retreat for abused children. I invited the board members to view the site. None attended, however Bob Sisterly said that he wanted to go - alone with me. He said he had set aside the whole day for it and was putting me under enormous pressure to go with him. I felt very uncomfortable about it as he had insisted on a number of details. First, it had to be a complete secret. I wasn't even allowed to tell my parents that I was going, let alone where I was going. Second, he had to drive. I wasn't even allowed to drive my car to the station and for us to drive together from there (my car had to stay at my unit car-park). And third, Bob Sisterly insisted on picking me up from my unit before day-break. This was unnecessary as the trip only takes two-hours. Of course, all of these bizarre "conditions" and the huge pressure that Bob Sisterly was putting me under made me feel extremely wary. With my parents' help I made up an excuse at the very last minute and did not go.

However, if I had done as Bob Sisterly had wanted and if anything had happened to me that day, I would have gone missing without a trace.

Sammy's relationship to Network X

Sammy, the 12-year-old-girl from Goldtown, was the main victim of the sexual abuse being perpetrated against children in the town. She referred to the offender (a man in his 60's) as her "boyfriend", and her close friends knew of the sexual activities between her and the man. The offender also happened to be the best friend of her father. I was asked to provide support to Sammy, and in one session it became apparent that Sammy's personality had been totally fragmented. In her words, she was like "a house with mirrors everywhere, smashed into broken bits". It was later that I learned about the Illuminati use of trauma-based mind control, sexual abuse and satanic ritual to force children to create "alter personalities". Other information from Sammy has led me to believe that she has been subjected to all these forms of abuse.

Sammy also told me that her relative takes her to Queensland (Australia) "whenever I want" and that she can get "whatever I want, too". It was only later that I learned of the immense significance of what Sammy was telling me. Sammy's relative is a Board member of Network X, who is based in Queensland. It is my belief that Sammy was being used in Network X's production of child pornography, both in Victoria and Queensland.

Here is another example of the police's failure to investigate a case with ominous connections to Network X. In particular, the police unit that has been established specifically and exclusively to investigate such cases well and truly ensured that this case would go NOWHERE.

After two sessions with Sammy I was told that the school had "received complaints" that I had "brainwashed the children" and the support sessions were terminated.

More Connections to the Illuminati - the Satanic Cult in Goldtown

I was to learn later that there is a Satanic cult operating in Goldtown. I learned this from two independent sources. One was from a Christian woman who was raised in the town and who since had moved elsewhere. The other was from an adult survivor of the cult, Mick.

The Satanic cult is very powerful within the town, and was headed up by the most powerful and influential families of the town. One of the members owned and operated the photographic studio in the town. Furthermore, Greg Neckett, the powerful politician mentioned previously, has significant "business operations" extremely close to Goldtown, and he was driven (by his driver) to this location every week.

Mick's Experiences

Mick was introduced to the satanic cult as a very young child by an extended relative. Mick informed me of many experiences he was subjected to as a child in this cult. From everything that I have been told by Mick, the cult appears to be the Order Templis Orientus (Illuminati), operating in Australia. Mick now suffers from MPD/DID but has survived his experiences remarkably well considering the traumas he has been through.

As a child Mick was forced to attend blood-rituals, where animals and small children were sacrificed and their blood and organs consumed. Mick was required to clean up the blood after these rituals. The children and babies were street children or were taken from orphanages, so that they could not be traced and no-one would know, or care, if they went missing. The rituals were spoken in Latin and were clearly satanic. The rituals took place at various locations, including Goldtown. Mick and other children would be driven to the rituals in the boots of cars.

The members of the cult were extremely powerful members of society. There were numerous politicians (mainly from the conservative party). These people would often speak of important events before they would actually occur. Mick was also sexually abused by Gerald Oanasis, the famous television personality and professional partner of Ernie Old.

Mick was one of the many children who were used to "host" parties of the cult members. At these parties the children acted as waiters and were naked. Many of the adults, but not all, would wear masks at these parties. After the food was served the adults would have sex with the children. Children who tried to escape were killed, often in front of the other children in order to control the children through fear. Once Mick and another child had tried to escape but were caught. The other child was murdered by having her head smashed open with a rock. Her body was then dumped in a nearby mineshaft. Mick was spared the same fate, as he was told that he was the "chosen one", selected to carry on the traditions of the group.

Mick was forced to participate in the production of child pornography, including movies as well as still photographs. This involved sexual activity with other children as well as adults. He would get paid a small amount for his sexual "services", while the relative who brought him to the events would get paid a large amount of money. As he got older, Mick was no longer used for sexual purposes by the group but was required to recruit new younger children. When he was old enough (in his 20's), Mick was able to escape the group but they continue to contact him with threats.

[to be continued]
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2014, 01:14 AM   #18
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)


Bob Sisterly's "Religion"

During my association with Bob Sisterly I got to know him (in some ways!) quite well. One day he informed me of his "religious" beliefs. These were the opposite of mine (as I am a Christian). I was also informed by one of his colleagues in the media industry that Bob's "religion" is "weird s--t". At the time I had not heard of the Illuminati and it is only now that I realise that Bob Sisterly is an active and dedicated member of the Australian Illuminati. The symbolism used in Network X promotional material is totally consistent with that of the Illuminati (Order Templis Orientus), such as the key colours - blue and gold, and key imagery involving flames.

Telephone Interference and Intimidation Begins

It was after reporting the events at Goldtown to Bob Sisterly that unusual events began to occur. My phone line began clicking, and the voice-mail service recorded the sounds of a tape clicking over (note, voice-mail does not use tapes for recording so the tape was from another source). Two of my organisations' staff members had their cars broken into on the same night. In one car, the book "The Clocks" by Agatha Christie was on the front seat. The book is the story of a series of murders where the only evidence left at each murder scene is a clock. On the front seat of the other staff member's car was a broken clock. Nothing was stolen from either car. On one occasion I purposely said over the phone that I kept all of my files in the backyard shed (this was not true, I just wanted to test the security of the telephone line). Soon after, the back shed was broken into.

Board Members Propose a Name-Change

At one board meeting, Harry Napkin, the head of the Agricultural Society, proposed to launch the organisation, despite the fact that it had been operating for nearly two years. He had three ideas. The first was that a rodeo would be organised, and whenever a rider fell from their horse or bull, money would be donated. Thus, it would be "money for every bruised butt". The second proposal was to organise a "beauty pageant" for 12-year-old girls. There would be an award given for "the prettiest girl on the shiniest pony". A photo of her on her horse would be used as a centre-page-spread in the leading newspaper (courtesy of the Editor-In-Chief contact). The third proposal was to have a photo of sexually abused children in an "animal birthing centre". This photo would also be published in the leading newspaper.

Harry Napkin also proposed a name-change. He proposed to change the name of the organisation to 'Shine'. I did not want to do this, and the members of the Board put me under incredible pressure to adopt this name-change.

It was only later that I learnt about the Illuminati connections and the significance of their symbolism and language. 'Shine' is a very significant Illuminati term.

Realisation Dawns

It was at this point that I realised that something was dreadfully wrong. I rejected all of the proposed ideas (very politely, but firmly). I also called for all outstanding Criminal Records Checks to be undertaken immediately. The Criminal Records Check had been designed only to identify whether a person had committed any sexual assaults against children or had any involvement in related offences, such as child pornography. Therefore, if a person had smoked marijuana in their university days, this would not be revealed in the Criminal Record Check.

This was a policy that I had insisted on right from the start (nearly two years ago), however Bob Sisterly had given numerous excuses every time I had requested his. He even went so far as to suggest that he would organise it "on the sly" using his "contacts in the force". I did not pursue that option and instead gave the Board members two weeks to complete their forms and submit them.

Bob Sisterly, while initially embracing the policy at the start, ultimately refused to submit a Criminal Records Check.

The Significance of Shine

I discovered that there is an Australian Internet-based group called 'Shine'. The site includes a membership section where members are able to exchange photos etc, including "S&M" and "hard-core Ernie Old style". It is a child pornography club that operates similar to the notorious Wonderland club.

I noted the code-names used by the operators of the Shine site, one of which was Natas (Satan backwards). I went to the Network X site and entered a secret section on the site (which members of the public would never know about). It asked for the password, so I typed in Natas, which took me to another level. It then asked for the next level password, which I didn't have. The computer then went beserk and was almost impossible to turn off. I managed to do so only by pulling out all of the connections. Soon after this, the Internet site for Network X was shut down and remained shut down for a number of months, which is rather unusual given that Network X is such a large company.

Later that year, the Department of Education put on a concert involving thousands of children. They chose to call it 'Shine'. This was an interesting choice of title, given my experience and other people's experiences of the Department of Education protecting pedophile teachers.

A further interesting connection was that Bob Sisterly and Ron Snide organised a meeting between us and the senior managers of the Department of Education. When we all met, the men acted as if they did not know each other and were meeting for the first time (exchanging business cards, etc). However, when the men thought I was gone (I was in fact standing just out of their sight), it was very clear that they not only knew each other, but that they knew each other extremely well. They were saying things such as "Great to see you again, mate!" and slapping each other on the back!

Escape from Bob Sisterly and the Pedophile Board

After I discovered what was going on (at least, I started to discover what was going on) I knew I had to break away from Bob Sisterly, Ron Snide and the people they had put on the Board of Management. The AGM was coming up and I organised for my family to attend. We did this secretly, as we knew that the phone lines were being monitored. On the night of the AGM, the board members were visibly shocked when they saw that members of my family were attending. It transpired that, rather than undertake a Criminal Records Check, the members of the Board had planned to resign on the spot. This served two purposes. One, they avoided having to undergo the Criminal Records Check. Two, the organisation would effectively fold as there would be no-one to take up the Board member positions. This is exactly what Bob Sisterly had wanted from the beginning, but especially since I had begun to uncover the corrupt pedophile police activities and the crimes in Goldtown.

However, as my family had attended the meeting, they were able to take up the positions on the Board, and the organisation did not fold. On the surface, the meeting was very amicable and civilized, Bob Sisterly tried to remain calm, but he ended up storming out of the meeting half-an-hour early.

Mother Receives Death Threat from Bob Sisterly

My family and I all waited for half-an-hour after the meeting had closed (to recover!) before leaving. We had all come in different cars, and my mother had parked her car in a nearby car park. She walked to her car by herself. We had not learnt to be security-conscious at that stage. As she approached her car she was surprised to see Bob Sisterly there (he had left the meeting half an hour early). He then approached her and said "You had better watch yourself. If you don't, someone might just run over you". He then drove off very suddenly and another board member followed in a different car.

My mother and father told me about this incident, which had left my mother very shaken. Soon after I received a message from Bob Sisterly saying "I only want to help". I was infuriated at the evil of this man, so I phoned his office and left a message with his Personal Assistant, Jan Pummell (I didn't know the significance of her husband's relationship with Bob Sisterly and Network X at this time) saying "Bob has said he just wants to help me. Could you please tell him that it would be helpful if he could undertake the Criminal Records Check that he has avoided for so long. After all, it is designed to only reveal if the person has committed sex offences against children or related offences, like the production of child pornography. Oh, could you also tell him it would be very helpful if he did not threaten members of my family. Death threats against my family really aren't helpful. If you could pass this message on, that would be great. Thanks".

Soon after leaving this message, my mother received a letter from Bob Sisterly. In the letter he stated that he was only joking when he told her to watch out or she'd end up being run over. Yeah, real funny joke.

Report to Department of Education - Complaints and Investigation Unit

After these experiences I made a complaint to the Complaints and Investigations Unit of the Department of Education. My complaint related to the conduct of teacher Dick Newman, which amounted to repeated acts of misconduct against students, and the police investigation at Goldtown.

Interestingly, the head of the Department of Education Complaints and Investigations Unit, Paul Gibbins, was at the very first meeting I had to outline my complaint. It was after this meeting that the material, which I had been assured by Peter Gibbins would remain strictly confidential, was given to Nick Flanagan and Edith Ireland (who subsequently paid a visit to the new President of the Board in an effort to pressure me to drop the complaint). Paul Gibbins then left that posting, but "coincidentally" was brought back to it to finish off the case involving Dick Newman.

Paul Gibbins wrote a letter to me exonerating Dick Newman on all counts "because the witnesses (which I had provided) cannot substantiate your claims". As you know, of the eight witnesses that I had provided to corroborate the case, only one had been contacted - and she RE-CONFIRMED the concerns about Dick Newman. In fact, she stated that she was amazed that it had taken so long for the matter to be investigated! She was shocked to discover that Dick Newman had been exonerated and that the Department of Education had LIED about her testimony!

After I did the telephone round of the witnesses I had listed and learnt that only one had been contacted, I phoned Paul Gibbins to ask how many of the witnesses had in fact been contacted. He said that he didn't know but that he would call me back "within 24 hours". Needless to say, I did not receive a return phonecall from pedophile-protecting Paul Gibbins.

I truly believe that if the parents of children attending Victorian schools new the extent to which pedophile-teachers are being protected by the Department of Education, they would boycott the education system altogether. And if they knew the suffering that some children and families have had to endure as a result of the pedophile-protecting actions of the Department of Education, they would boycott the system on those grounds too. I am convinced if the parents of children attending the northern region secondary college new of the monster teaching their children, and his shocking and extensive history of abusing students, there would not be a single child enrolled in that school in the future!

Leaked Document

After numerous meetings concerning the complaint (which I was told would be kept strictly confidential, particularly from Nick Flanagan and his unit), a document was leaked to me form within the Department of Education. This document revealed that the Department planned to absolve Dick Newman from all complaints. The investigation had been totally and completely corrupted in order to absolve Newman.

The grounds for this were that "no complaints of a sexual nature have been made against Dick Newman since 1995". This was unbelievable! So Newman's invitations for students to meet his penis after school were not considered to be sexual! Also, it was stated that as the schools had taken action in relation to each case, there was nothing more to be done. So, it was therefore acceptable for a teacher to commit repeated acts of serious misconduct, against multiple students, at different schools.

It was very clear that this teacher was being actively protected.

Theft of Department of Education Files

I left a message with the Minister for Education to inform her that I had received information to indicate that the investigation had been seriously corrupted. Soon after, the unit that I lived in was broken into and files containing information about the Department of Education's protection of pedophile teachers were stolen. This included a letter from a mother pleading for help as her son had been sexually assaulted by a teacher and was now suicidal. She wanted my help as the Department of Education was covering up for this pedophile teacher. Nothing else was stolen from the unit.

Visit to the New President of the Board

A new President was appointed to the Board, along with other new members. One day, the new President of the Board received a visit from one of the workers in the child protection field. This woman, Enid Ireland, approached the new President and told him that Detective Senior Sergeant Nick Flanagan knew about the complaint I had made to the Department of Education (indicating a significant breach of confidentiality). She told the new President to cease any association with me and my organisation "for the sake of your professional reputation". The incident spooked the new President enough for him to telephone me in an effort to get me to drop my complaint against Flanagan and his unit, which I refused to do. Thankfully, the new President had the integrity and courage to stick with our organisation despite the pressure he was being put under.

Anonymous reports to Crime Stoppers

Approximately 12 months had passed when I decided I would make an anonymous call to Crime Stoppers, a phone-in service where people can give anonymous tips to police about crimes. I telephoned Crime Stoppers from a public phone and informed the woman, Katie, of the pedophile network that was operating in Melbourne. She asked me to call back again with further information and I did so.

I told Katie that the network was operating under police protection and at that stage had not given her the police officers' names who were implicated. She then asked me to provide the names of the police officers who were involved. I told her that I was very nervous to do this, as my family and I had suffered very negative repercussions as a result of this group and I didn't want us to have to go through any more traumas. She spoke to her boss and he promised me that the information I provided would not go to the police officers of concern, and that the information would go straight to the Ethical Standards Division (ESD), which is the same as Internal Investigations. As she and her boss had promised that the information would go straight to ESD, I gave her the names of the officers.

When I called back again to find out how the case was proceeding I was shocked when Katie told me that her boss had forced her to send the information to Nick Flanagan's unit! The information had gone directly to Nick Flanagan!! Katie apologised and appeared to be genuinely distressed at what had happened. I asked to speak to her boss and I told him that he had promised that the material would go to ESD, and he exclaimed "Do you realise how serious your allegations are?" I replied that of-course I did - that's why I wanted the information to go to ESD, and not to the police officers of concern! He said "We don't pass on information to ESD". Katie then got back on the phone and was clearly very upset. She implored me to contact ESD and give them the information myself.

Intimidation & Harassment Begins Again

Soon after this, my family and I were subjected to harassment and surveillance. For example, nearly every day there would be a car out the front of my parent's home (where I had now moved to, for safety reasons), with two men just sitting there. The men often had large walkie-talkies. The cars often had large, thick aerials. Whenever a member of the family walked out of the house the people in the cars would speed off. However, sometimes we were followed by the people in the cars. The cars were usually very flashy, like large four-wheel-drives or dark shiny sedans. I was often followed by men in white shiny cars with the number plates beginning with VHA and was to later learn that these cars were often used as government vehicles. Sometimes I would come out of a location, say a friend's house, and there would be a man in one of the flashy vehicles just waiting there. It was very menacing and very stressful for my family and I. We also received unusual phone-calls at that time, clicking noises over the phone and sometimes the phone-calls were actively intercepted with heavy breathing or laughter or shuddering screams. My incoming mail was very clearly being interfered with.

Visits from the Mormons

One day my mother and I came out from my parent's house and there was a group of men waiting in a car out the front of our house again. They sped off when we came out, but this time I got in my car and followed them. As I drove towards them (they had turned their car around and were facing me) they flashed their lights at me. I drove around the cul-de-sac, and was shocked when I got to my parent's house again. The men were talking to my mother from in their car. I called for her to get away from the men and she replied "Its OK dear, they're Mormons". I did not believe they were Mormons and I held my hand on the car horn and chased them out of the street. A licence check on their car however, seemed to indicate that they really were Mormons, or were using a Mormon-registered car.

I did not think they would ever return (especially if they really were Mormons!). However, two weeks later I was getting into my car and saying goodbye to my mother. The same men approached my mother, not realising I was in the car. They asked if they could ask her a few questions about me. I then stuck my head out of the car window and said "If you've got any questions you can ask me!" They were very surprised that I was there and asked "Why did you chase us out of the street that day. We are just Mormons". I replied "Because some of your behaviour is most un-Mormon-like!" The man the said "Like what?" and I replied "Like flashing your lights at me". He then said "Oh, you mean when we were taking photos of you? You didn't like us taking photos of you?".

The 'Mormons' had just admitted to taking photos of me, without my knowledge or consent.

I told them to stay away from me and my family.

Soon after this I saw the same men in a different car. It was a dark, flashy sedan, similar to those that were often sitting in our street. I got the licence plate of this car and gave it to a trusted police office. He told me that the car was owned by a debt-collecting agency, or more likely, a surveillance company as they often used debt-collecting as a front. The owner of the car, however not one of the men who had been seen in the car, was a Mormon.

The Mormons were very clearly conducting surveillance on my family and me.

Reports to Deputy Ombudsman

After the problems with Crime Stoppers I decided to call the Ombudsman's office and pass on the information I had to them, including the incident with Crime Stoppers. The Deputy Ombudsman, Ian Softman, put me under a great deal of pressure to meet with him and hand over all of my information to him for investigation. I said that I wanted to meet with the new Chief Commissioner of Police, Angela Franklin, as she was dedicated to flushing out bent police. Ian Softman told me that he would try to arrange this. However, he reported that it was not possible and again put me under great pressure to give all of my information to him for investigation.

I finally did succeed in getting an appointment with the Chief Commissioner. Contrary to Ian Softman's claim that she could not meet with me, she had never been informed that I had tried to get a meeting with her through him. She was extremely annoyed when she had been left out of the loop in this way, and the incident just added to my suspicions about the motives of Softman.

Thefts of Evidence

While I was reporting information to Softman over the phone anonymously, two thefts of evidence occurred. On the first occasion, the file was stolen from the boot of the car. I had left it there for two hours while I attended to a matter at a school. When I returned I discovered that it had been taken. I rushed home to check that the copy left at my parent's house was still there. I discovered that my parent's house had been broken into, the dogs drugged, and the file stolen from a hiding place. Much was taken, including the letter of admission from Bob Sisterly (of the threat to my mother).

Luckily, I had kept a third copy with somebody else.

Fires at Network X Studio, Melbourne GPO and Celebrities Home

At this time a number of significant fires occurred. One was at a studio used by Network X. Interestingly, the copy of the network's recent multi-million dollar production had "coincidentally' been removed from the studio two days before the fire. All that survived the fire was a Sesame Street character, which took centre place in a photo of the scene in the leading newspaper's report. Within a week there was another fire, this time at the Melbourne General Post Office. All of the post offices boxes (and their contents) were destroyed, though little else was affected. Finally, again within a week, a suspicious house fire occurred in he home of a well-known television celebrity. This celebrity is a member of the same secret society as Ron Snide. All that was destroyed in the fire was a collection of videos and photographs. Interestingly, the comment of the celebrity was "It can all be put to bed now". A strange thing to say after your house has just gone up in smoke?

A further interesting incident occurred at Melbourne's largest brothel. An armed intruder stole a relatively small amount of cash from the brothel, but was led to the safe where videotapes of clients engaging in sexual activities were kept. Video tapes of clients were "stolen", including those of Greg Neckett, a frequent client of this establishment. A reliable contact informed me that the theft was actually an "inside job".

Within a two-week period, thousands of videos had gone up in smoke or destroyed.

These events occurred at the time of the reports being made to Ian Snow. It is also very interesting to note that at that time, the British section of Interpol was in Victoria conducting a "secret" investigation into child pornography.

Children Tortured or Die in Mysterious Circumstances

It was also around this time that a number of children connected to the child pornography industry were either killed in suspicious circumstances, or tortured. I was working with a young girl and was very concerned for her safety at this time. I told a trusted police officer of my concerns for this girl. A week later she had been rushed to hospital. An unregistered "tank" (her word, meaning a very solidly built car) had come out of nowhere and slammed into the car in which she was a passenger. Thankfully, she survived.

Fears for My Life

I had managed to arrange a meeting with the Chief Commissioner of Police (this was no small feat, as there had been many stumbling blocks and it appeared that there were people actively trying to prevent such a meeting). In the weeks leading up to the meeting I was in real fear for my life. On one occasion I came home late at night and saw two men sitting in a car just up from my parent's house. As no-one was home at my parent's house I drove to the top of the hill to stay with my friends. They did not hear the door-bell, and while I was standing in the street wondering where I would go, the men in the car drove up the hill very slowly, looking for me. I had all of the evidence with me (since the thefts I did not let it out of my sight) and had to quickly hide in the bushes. The men drove up and down the street no less than five times looking for me. I had to cut through the backs of homes in order to get to another friend's house, where I stayed the night. They also witnessed the men driving up and down the street looking for me.

The next evening I heard and saw the same car drive up the hill. As no-one was going to be home that evening I quickly got in my car and drove to another friend's house where I stayed the night. The next morning the friends discovered that their front light had been smashed in. No other houses in the street had been affected. However, the neighbours did report hearing strange cars driving up and down the quiet street late that night. It was after this that I wondered if I would live to be able to hand over all the information I had to the Chief Commissioner.

Meeting with the Chief Commissioner of Police

I attended the meeting with the Chief Commissioner of Police along with the trusted police officer who had investigated the house break in and thefts of the files. The Chief Commissioner believed me and was very concerned. She organised for the matter to be thoroughly investigated. The Chief Commissioner asked me if I wanted police protection for my family, which I declined (sometimes that results in more trouble). She told me I could contact her office whenever necessary.

Soon after this my unit was broken into and one of my collectable dolls had the eyes painted over. I phoned the Chief Commissioner's Personal Assistant and let her know that I would be sending the Chief a letter via registered mail. At the start of the conversation the line was clearly intercepted, which the Personal Assistant heard. She told me to call her back from a public phone. Interestingly, after letting her know that a letter was coming to her via registered mail, the Chief Commissioner did not receive it. I called some weeks later after having received no response, and was told that the letter had somehow been intercepted! All letters to the Chief are signed for, and the person who had signed for the registered letter I had sent was not known in the police force. However, after two days of the Chief Commissioner demanding to know where the letter went, it turned up with a post-it note attached 'Sorry, didn't know where to send this'. Well, to the person it is addressed to might be a start!

Ethical Standards Department Investigation gets off to a Questionable Start

I had a meeting to begin my statement to the Ethical Standards Department. It was clear that the officer appointed to the case did not believe what I had to report. While he went to have a smoke, he (accidentally) left me with the report that had been written by another police officer in response to my own report (that had been submitted to the Chief). I could see why the police officer I was dealing with was so dismissive of what I had to say. The report discredited everything that I had reported. It made a mockery of my claim that Ernie Old and other high-profile individuals were involved in pedophilia and stated that there was nothing to support my claims of intimidation and harassment. This was despite the fact that there were numerous witnesses to these events.

The author went on to say that an investigation must be seen to be conducted however, because if the information was to be made public there would be a public outcry. That is, make it look like it is being investigated, but don't do anything!

Even more disturbing was the specific recommendation that a Detective Alex Mock be appointed to conduct the investigation. Detective Mock was a close friend and colleague of Nick Flanagan's, and had in fact worked with him in his unit for many years. Indeed, Detective Mock had only left Nick Flanagan's unit three months ago to be transferred to ESD.

It was very interesting timing. At the same time Nick Flanagan receives information that someone is dobbing him in for misconduct, his close friend and colleague gets a transfer to ESD, and ends up with the job of investigating his best mate! How very convenient.

The Deputy Ombudsman Gets the Investigation

After this turn of events (I reported it all to the Chief Commissioner)., the Deputy Ombudsman, Ian Softman, was given the investigation.

Child Care Centre, Pedophile Network, Police Pedophiles and Network X

Ian Softman informed me briefly about a case in the early 1990's. I did my own research into this case and discovered that it involved a creche in the Mornington Peninsula region. A high-profile group of men were sexually abusing, torturing and hypnotising the children. The owner and his wife took the children out of the centre during the day to the homes of the rich and powerful, where the children would be sexually abused, tortured and filmed. The children were also subjected to satanic ritual abuse. This case was almost identical to those in the U.S (Little Rascals, McMartin and others).

The offenders were wealthy and powerful men in the community and included police officers.

Video copies of the children being abused were obtained by Network X (How interesting it is that Network X should be involved). However, when the story went public, the video tapes went "missing" and the police claimed that they never received them.

Ultimately, the police did not take any action against the owner of the creche, on the grounds that the children were too young to be viewed as credible witnesses. While there was conclusive evidence that four of the children had been raped or sexually abused while at the day care centre, the owner was never charged.

A concerned parent with links to the underworld offered the head of a bikie group $10,000 to inflict enough damage so as to ensure that the owner of the creche could never sexually abuse another child again. The head of the bikie group said that they knew about the owner of the creche, and what he was up to, however, they could not do the job. Much as they would like to, the owner had protection from the very highest levels. He was untouchable.

When the Mornington Peninsula child-care-centre case broke, an investigative journalist infiltrated an elite child-pornography and pedophile club based in Melbourne. Its members were all wealthy and elite members of Melbourne society. It was chaired by the CEO of a major Melbourne Charitable Trust. This article included information on their use of telephone monitoring, courtesy of the group's contacts within Telecom.

The children from the Mornington Peninsula child-care-centre reported being taken to a "pink" room with a spa and other significant decor. It was in a house where the children were sexually abused, tortured and filmed (amongst other locations). Three children independently identified the house that they had been taken to, to the investigators. Sure enough, the room had been painted a dusty-pink color, and it had a spa and the other decor items described by the children. However, as you now know, no further action was taken against the owner of the child-care-centre, nor others suspected of being involved in the ring. What is most significant however, is that the pink house WAS REGISTERED TO THE VICTORIA POLICE!!

I am now working with some of the young survivors of the child-care centre and their families. It is clear that a cover-up of the highest order occurred in 1992, and the children and their families are still suffering from it.

Present Days

All of this material is currently being investigated by the Deputy Ombudsman. However, the investigation has been marred by suspicious activity. Perhaps the most significant example is the conduct of the police officer Ian Soft appointed to head the investigation, Detective Jock Westland.

My colleague, a counsellor who worked on the 1992 Mornington Peninsula Creche case, provided Jock Westland with information pertaining to a video tape that depicted police actively involved in the satanic-ritual-sexual abuse of children from the creche. This is highly significant information. However, I discovered from one of the other investigators that Jock Westland had decided not to pass this information on for further investigation. In fact, his notes read "This witness (my colleague) has no information of significance".

In addition to this, Jock Westland refused to investigate my claims of intimidation and harassment on the grounds that I was "paranoid". This is despite the fact that there are many witnesses to certain events who can corroborate my claims, and indeed, several have provided Statutory Declarations to do so.

Jock Westland has been under "investigation" for these actions for two months now, and I am yet to find out whether he will continue to be involved in this investigation. If he remains on the case we can be sure that this so-called investigation is just another example of high-level white-wash and cover-up of organised pedophilia and child pornography in Australia.

A final note on the Department of Education investigation. I received a letter stating that Dick Newman had been cleared of all charges, as the witnesses could not substantiate my claims. However, of the pool of eight witnesses I had provided ONLY ONE HAD BEEN CONTACTED and she clearly re-affirmed the concerns about Dick Newman. Another cover-up of the highest order and complete protection given to one of the untouchable pedophile elite.

P.S. All the real names of these child abusers are kept at several locations with different people. Should anything happen to me or anyone associated with me or should I or my organisation be harassed in any way, the names will be revealed immediately from several sources.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2014, 09:51 AM   #19
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

News.com.au - January 14, 2014
UK child abuse inquiry to hear from 61 Australians

THE biggest public inquiry into child abuse ever held in the UK has opened with at least 60 Australians listed as witnesses.

Such has been the outpouring of complaints from former child migrants sent to Australia in the 1940s and 1950s, an investigative team from Northern Ireland will be dispatched to interview them personally later this year as the inquiry proceeds.

The $35 million Northern Ireland government-backed Historical Institutional Abuse (HIA) inquiry is looking at systemic failings in duty of care to children in institutional care in Northern Ireland between 1922 and 1995.

In his opening remarks, inquiry chairman retired High Court judge Sir Anthony Hart told Banbridge Courthouse in County Down in Northern Ireland, the inquiry would be conducted "without fear or favour" and would be hearing from 434 people in person or in writing many with harrowing claims of abuse.

"Not only will their evidence be vital to the Inquiry, but it is our hope that every applicant who gives evidence to the public hearings, or only speaks to the private and confidential part of the Inquiry, will have the satisfaction of knowing that their experiences are at last being listened to and investigated," he said.

"I say 'at last being listened to' because one of the things that we have heard again and again is that when complaints about abuse were made to people in authority, all too often their response was to ignore, or not to believe, what they were being told."

He said of the 434, 61 people from Australia would be giving evidence largely in written form already taken by an investigative team dispatched to Australia in the middle of last year. He said the high number may be a surprise to some but most were among the 120 children from Ireland and Northern Ireland sent to Australia as part of a migration program after World War II. Many of these were from 13 religious or state institutions currently being investigated.

"They were known as child migrants," Sir Anthony said.

"We are investigating how they were treated in institutions before they left Northern Ireland, and why and how they were sent to Australia. Last autumn we sent a team to Australia which spent some weeks interviewing applicants there. It was not possible to see every applicant in Australia during that visit, and I want to take this opportunity to reassure those applicants in Australia we have not yet seen that later this year we will be sending another team out to Australia to see the remaining applicants."

The majority of the Australian victims are from Western Australia.

One Australian victim has privately detailed in writing about how her abuse at the hands of nuns came on the voyage to Australia under the Catholic Episcopal Migrant Welfare program to be housed at Christian Brothers and Nazareth Sisters led homes.

Others were told they were orphans when they were not and had suffered years of identity loss before in later adult life finding out they did have family.

Among the Australian evidence are cases of sexual assault of the then children at the hands of their Australian foster families. The inquiry will hand evidence of criminal cases to relevant police.

Many of the Australian victims are aged in their 70s and 80s. Sir Anthony has revealed some of those wanting to given evidence have died since the inquiry was called in 2012.

Australian victims are likely to be among the first to give evidence with the hearings opening on historical activities of Nazareth House Children’s Home in Londonderry.

The investigation comes after a long-running public inquiry in the neighbouring Republic of Ireland uncovered endemic abuse in church-run children's homes dating back to the 1930s.

It also comes as Australia’s Royal Commission to investigate Institutional responses to Child Sexual Abuse marked its first anniversary this week after hearing from 1000 victims of child sex abuse since hearings began in April 2013.

That is inquiry is expected to report in 2015.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-01-2014, 10:59 AM   #20
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0 (0 Posts)

gulfnews - January 28, 2014
‘Shocking’ Salvation Army abuse claims in Australia

Graphic cases of abuse detailed to Australian inquiry

Sydney: Children were sodomised with a garden hose, locked in outdoor cages and savagely beaten by Salvation Army majors in graphic cases of abuse detailed on Tuesday to an Australian inquiry.

A Royal Commission into child sexual abuse in Australia began hearing evidence into allegations of abuse at four Salvation Army homes for children between 1966 and 1977, which counsel assisting the inquiry Simeon Beckett warned would be “shocking to many”.

“The abuse that is to be detailed before the Royal Commission in the course of this case study is likely to be disturbing and at the severe end of sexual abuse,” he said in his opening address.

The investigative commission was established by former prime minister Julia Gillard in response to a series of child sex abuse scandals involving paedophile priests, though she insisted the probe would be much broader than the Catholic Church.

It is examining allegations of child sexual abuse in places of worship, orphanages, community groups and schools.

Beckett said that at the homes run by the Christian Salvation Army, “boys were frequently punched by the officers with closed fists, thrown on the ground with force or up against a wall” or caned and whipped with straps until they bled.

“One boy had his shoulder dislocated by an officer during a punishment which involved hitting his testicles with a leather strap. Two boys were locked in cages on a veranda,” he said.

Beckett said corporal punishment and sexual abuse were frequent. One boy was punished after running away by having a “hose (inserted) into his anus” and “was placed in a cage on the home’s veranda for a week” after complaining that another boy was abusing him.

“When he was released from the cage he was forcibly sodomised by (a) major,” Beckett said.

Other boys were burnt with cigarettes, had detergent forcibly poured down their throats, and one was forcibly dragged from his bed at night and raped by Major Lawrence Wilson — described by colleagues as a “brutal and evil man”.

According to Beckett the Salvation Army has paid out Aus$1.2 million (Dh3.8 million or US$1.05 million) to date to Wilson’s victims. He died in 2008.

Wilson would conduct a daily “sick parade” in which he would single out boys to be physically inspected in private and sexually assault them.

Sexual abuse at one children’s home called Bexley was widespread, not only by Wilson but also among the boys who lived there, Beckett added.

“In addition other Salvation Army officers and staff abused residents, as did members of the public. These persons had access to the boys’ dormitories at night and would access the dormitories and sexually assault the boys,” Beckett said.

Kate Eastman, counsel for the Salvation Army at the Royal Commission, expressed the religious group’s “deep regret”.

“We acknowledge that it was a failure of the greatest magnitude,” she said, insisting that today’s Salvation Army had strong policies in place “so that children will never be placed in situations like this again”.
troyhand is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.